80 FR 10066 - Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Seabird Research Activities in Central California, 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 37 (February 25, 2015)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 37 (February 25, 2015)
| Page Range | 10066-10071 | |
| FR Document | 2015-03849 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 37 (Wednesday, February 25, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 10066-10071] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-03849] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648-XD660 Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Seabird Research Activities in Central California, 2015-2016 AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental harassment authorization. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) regulations, we hereby give notification that the National Marine Fisheries Service has issued an Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA) to Point Blue Conservation Science (Point Blue), to take marine mammals, by Level B harassment, incidental to conducting seabird and pinniped research activities in central California, January 2015 through January 2016. DATES: Effective January 31, 2015, through January 30, 2016. ADDRESSES: The public may obtain an electronic copy of the Point Blue's application, supporting documentation, the authorization, and a list of the references cited in this document by visiting: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental/research.htm. In the case of problems accessing these documents, please call the contact listed here (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). The Environmental Assessment and associated Finding of No Significant Impact, prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, are also available at the same site. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeannine Cody, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS (301) 427-8401. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1361 [[Page 10067]] et seq.) directs the Secretary of Commerce to authorize, upon request, the incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine mammals of a species or population stock, by United States citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if: (1) We make certain findings; (2) the taking is limited to harassment; and (3) we provide a notice of a proposed authorization to the public for review. We shall grant an authorization for the incidental taking of small numbers of marine mammals if we find that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or stock(s), and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses (where relevant). Also, the authorization must set forth the permissible methods of taking and requirements pertaining to the monitoring and reporting of such takings. We have defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as ``an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival.'' Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the MMPA defines ``harassment'' as: Any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering [Level B harassment]. Summary of Request We received an application on July 30, 2014, from Point Blue requesting the taking by harassment of small numbers of marine mammals incidental to conducting seabird and pinniped research activities on Southeast Farallon Island, A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island, Point Reyes National Seashore, San Francisco Bay, and the Russian River in central California. We determined the application complete and adequate on December 7, 2014. Point Blue, along with partners Oikonos Ecosystem Knowledge, Point Reyes National Seashore with the National Park Service, and the Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary would conduct this research under cooperative agreements with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in consultation with the Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary. The proposed research activities would occur for one year, January 31, 2015, through January 30, 2016, and would involve annual monitoring and censusing of seabird colonies; seabird nesting habitat observations; nesting burrows restoration; breeding elephant seals observations; and the periodic resupply of a field station. These proposed activities would occur in the vicinity of pinniped haul out sites and could likely result in the incidental take of marine mammals. We anticipate take, by Level B Harassment only, of individuals of either California sea lions (Zalophus californianus), Pacific harbor seals (Phoca vitulina), northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris), or Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) to result from the specified activity. This is the organization's sixth request for an Authorization. To date, we have issued an Incidental Harassment Authorization (Authorization) to Point Blue (formerly known as PRBO Conservation Science) for the conduct of similar activities from 2007 to 2013 (72 FR 71121, December 14, 2007; 73 FR 77011, December 18, 2008; 75 FR 8677, February 19, 2010; 77 FR 73989, December 7, 2012, 78 FR 66686, November 6, 2013). Description of the Specified Activity Overview Point Blue proposes to monitor and census seabird colonies; observe seabird nesting habitat; restore nesting burrows; observe breeding elephant and harbor seals; and resupply a field station annually in central California (i.e., Southeast Farallon Island, West End Island, A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island, Point Reyes National Seashore, San Francisco Bay, and the Russian River in Sonoma County). The purpose of the seabird research is to continue a 30-year monitoring program of the region's seabird populations. Point Blue's long-term pinniped research program monitors pinniped colonies to understand elephant and harbor seal population dynamics and to contribute to the conservation of both species. Dates and Duration The Authorization would be effective from January 31, 2015 through January 30, 2016. Following is a brief summary of the dates and duration of the activities. Seabird Research on Southeast Farallon Island: Daily observations of seabird colonies would occur at a maximum frequency of three 15- minute visits. Daily observations of breeding common murre (Uria aalge) colonies would occur at a maximum frequency of a single five-hour visit. These activities usually involve one or two observers conducting daily censuses of seabirds or conducting mark/recapture studies of breeding seabirds on the island. Field Station Resupply on Southeast Farallon Island: Resupply of the field station would occur once every two weeks at a maximum frequency of 26 visits annually. Resupply activities involve personnel approaching either the North Landing or East Landing by motorboat to offload supplies. Pinniped Research in Central California: Surveys of breeding northern elephant seals on Southeast Farallon and A[ntilde]o Nuevo Islands, the coastline of Point Reyes Peninsula, San Francisco Bay, and the Russian River, would occur in early December and late February, annually. At least three researchers would visit the sites at a maximum frequency of five times per year. Seabird Research and Field Supply on A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island: Researchers would monitor seabird burrow nesting habitat quality, conduct habitat restoration, and resupply the field station from April through August at a maximum frequency of 20 visits annually. Occasionally, researchers would also conduct intermittent visits to the island throughout the year. These activities involve two to three researchers accessing the island by motorboat. Seabird Research on Point Reyes National Seashore: The National Park Service in collaboration with Point Blue monitors seabird breeding and roosting colonies; conducts habitat restoration; removes non-native plants; monitors intertidal areas; and maintains coastal dune habitat. Seabird monitoring usually involves one or two observers conducting the survey by small boats along the shoreline. Researchers would visit the site at a maximum frequency of 20 times per year. Specified Geographic Region Point Blue will conduct their research activities within the vicinity of pinniped haul out sites in the following locations: South Farallones Islands: The South Farallon Islands consist of Southeast Farallon Island located at 37[deg]41'54.32'' N; 123[deg] 0'8.33'' W and West End Island. The South Farallon Islands have a land area of approximately 120 acres (0.49 square kilometers (km)) and are part of the Farallon National Wildlife Refuge. The islands are located near the edge of the continental shelf 28 miles (mi) (45.1 km) west of San Francisco, CA, and lie [[Page 10068]] within the waters of the Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary. A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island: A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island located at 37[deg] 6'29.25'' N; 122[deg]20'12.20'' W is one-quarter mile (402 meters (m)) offshore of A[ntilde]o Nuevo Point in San Mateo County, CA. The island lies within the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary and the A[ntilde]o Nuevo State Marine Conservation Area. Point Reyes National Seashore: Point Reyes National Seashore is approximately 40 miles (64.3 km) north of San Francisco Bay and also lies within the Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary. San Francisco Bay: The main part of San Francisco Bay measures approximately 3 to 12 miles (5 to 20 km) wide east-to-west and between 48 miles (77 km) and 60 miles (97 km) north-to-south. Russian River: The Russian River coastline stretches for approximately 55 miles just south of San Francisco. Starting at Lake Mendocino, the Russian River flows south through valleys in Mendocino and Sonoma County, and empties into the Pacific Ocean at Jenner, California. Detailed Description of Activities We outlined the purpose of Point Blue's activities in a previous notice for the proposed authorization (79 FR 76975, December 23, 2014). The proposed activities have not changed between the proposed authorization notice and this final notice announcing the issuance of the Authorization. For a more detailed description of the authorized action, we refer the reader to the notice for the proposed authorization (79 FR 76975, December 23, 2014). Comments and Responses We published a notice of receipt of Point Blue's application and proposed Authorization in the Federal Register on December 23, 2014 (79 FR 76975). During the 30-day comment period, we received one comment from the Marine Mammal Commission (Commission) which recommended that we issue the requested Authorization, provided that Point Blue carries out the required monitoring and mitigation measures as described in the notice of the proposed authorization (79 FR 76975, December 23, 2014) and the application. We have included all measures proposed in the notice of the proposed authorization (79 FR 76975, December 23, 2014) in the Authorization. Description of the Marine Mammals in the Area of the Proposed Specified Activity The marine mammals most likely to be harassed incidental to conducting seabird and pinniped research at the proposed research areas are primarily California sea lions, northern elephant seals, Pacific harbor seals, and to a lesser extent the eastern distinct population segment (DPS) of the Steller sea lion, which NMFS has removed from the list of threatened species under the U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), effective November 2013. The ESA does not categorize California sea lions, northern elephant seals, Pacific harbor seals as threatened or endangered and the MMPA categorizes these species as not depleted. On the other hand, despite the delisting of Steller sea lions as endangered under the ESA, NMFS still categorizes the species as a strategic stock and depleted species under the MMPA. The agency will consider designating the eastern stock of Steller sea lions as non-strategic and not depleted under the MMPA following review by the Alaska Scientific Review Group in 2014. We refer the public to Carretta et al., (2014) for general information on these species which we presented in the notice of the proposed authorization (79 FR 76975, December 23, 2014). The publication is available at: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/pdf/po2012.pdf. Other Marine Mammals in the Proposed Action Area California (southern) sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis), listed as threatened under the ESA and categorized as depleted under the MMPA, usually range in coastal waters within 1.24 miles (2 km) of the shoreline. Point Blue has not encountered California sea otters during the course of their seabird or pinniped research activities over the past five years. This species is managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and we do not consider it further in this notice of issuance of an Authorization. Potential Effects on Marine Mammals Acoustic and visual stimuli generated by: (1) Noise generated by motorboat approaches and departures; (2) noise generated during restoration activities and loading operations while resupplying the field station; and (3) human presence during seabird and pinniped research activities, have the potential to cause California sea lions, Pacific harbor seals, northern elephant seals, and Steller sea lions hauled out in areas within Southeast Farallon Island, West End Island, A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island, Point Reyes National Seashore, San Francisco Bay, and the Russian River to flush into the surrounding water or to cause a short-term behavioral disturbance for marine mammals. We expect that acoustic and visual stimuli resulting from the proposed motorboat operations and human presence has the potential to harass marine mammals. We also expect that these disturbances would be temporary and result, at worst, in a temporary modification in behavior and/or low-level physiological effects (Level B harassment) of certain species of marine mammals. We included a summary and discussion of the ways that the types of stressors associated with Point Blue's specified activities (i.e., visual and acoustic disturbance) have the potential to impact marine mammals in a previous notice for the proposed authorization (79 FR 76975, December 23, 2014). Vessel Strike: The potential for striking marine mammals is a concern with vessel traffic. However, it is highly unlikely that the use of small, slow-moving boats to access the research areas would result in injury, serious injury, or mortality to any marine mammal. Typically, the reasons for vessel strikes are fast transit speeds, lack of maneuverability, or not seeing the animal because the boat is so large. Point Blue's researchers will access areas at slow transit speeds in easily maneuverable boats negating any chance of an accidental strike. Rookeries: No research activities would occur on pinniped rookeries and breeding animals are concentrated in areas where researchers would not visit. Therefore, we do not expect mother and pup separation or crushing of pups during flushing. The potential effects to marine mammals described in the notice for the proposed authorization (79 FR 76975, December 23, 2014) did not take into consideration the proposed monitoring and mitigation measures described later in this document (see the ``Proposed Mitigation'' and ``Proposed Monitoring and Reporting'' sections). Anticipated Effects on Habitat We considered these impacts in detail in the notice for the proposed authorization (79 FR 76975, December 23, 2014). Briefly, we do not anticipate that the proposed research activities would result in any significant or long-term effects on the habitats used by the marine mammals in the proposed area, [[Page 10069]] including the food sources they use (i.e., fish and invertebrates). While we anticipate that the specified activity could potentially result in marine mammals avoiding certain areas due to temporary ensonification and human presence, this impact to habitat is temporary and reversible. We do not consider behavioral modification to cause significant or long-term consequences for individual marine mammals or their populations. Mitigation In order to issue an incidental take authorization under section 101(a)(5)(D) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act, we must set forth the permissible methods of taking pursuant to such activity, and other means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact on such species or stock and its habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar significance, and the availability of such species or stock for taking for certain subsistence uses. Point Blue has based the mitigation measures which they will implement during the proposed research, on the following: (1) Protocols used during previous Point Blue seabird research activities as required by our previous authorizations for these activities; and (2) recommended best practices in Richardson et al. (1995). To reduce the potential for disturbance from acoustic and visual stimuli associated with the activities Point Blue and/or its designees has proposed to implement the following mitigation measures for marine mammals: (1) Postpone beach landings on A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island until pinnipeds that may be present on the beach have slowly entered the water. (2) Select a pathway of approach to research sites that minimizes the number of marine mammals harassed. (3) Avoid visits to sites used by pinnipeds for pupping. (4) Monitor for offshore predators and do not approach hauled out pinnipeds if great white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) or killer whales (Orcinas orca) are present. If Point Blue and/or its designees see predators in the area, they must not disturb the animals until the area is free of predators. (5) Keep voices hushed and bodies low to the ground in the visual presence of pinnipeds. (6) Conduct seabird observations at North Landing on Southeast Farallon Island in an observation blind, shielded from the view of hauled out pinnipeds. (7) Crawl slowly to access seabird nest boxes on A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island if pinnipeds are within view. (8) Coordinate research visits to intertidal areas of Southeast Farallon Island (to reduce potential take) and coordinate research goals for A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island to minimize the number of trips to the island. (9) Coordinate monitoring schedules on A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island, so that areas near any pinnipeds would be accessed only once per visit. (10) Have the lead biologist serve as an observer to evaluate incidental take. Mitigation Conclusions NMFS has carefully evaluated the applicant's proposed mitigation measures and have considered a range of other measures in the context of ensuring that we have prescribed the means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact on the affected marine mammal species and stocks and their habitat. NMFS' evaluation of potential measures included consideration of the following factors in relation to one another: (1) The manner in which, and the degree to which, we expect that the successful implementation of the measure would minimize adverse impacts to marine mammals; (2) The proven or likely efficacy of the specific measure to minimize adverse impacts as planned; and (3) The practicability of the measure for applicant implementation. Any mitigation measure(s) prescribed by NMFS should be able to accomplish, have a reasonable likelihood of accomplishing (based on current science), or contribute to the accomplishment of one or more of the general goals listed below: 1. Avoidance or minimization of injury or death of marine mammals wherever possible (goals 2, 3, and 4 may contribute to this goal). 2. A reduction in the numbers of marine mammals (total number or number at biologically important time or location) exposed to activities expected to result in the take of marine mammals (this goal may contribute to 1, above, or to reducing harassment takes only). 3. A reduction in the number of times (total number or number at biologically important time or location) individuals would be exposed to activities expected to result in the take of marine mammals (this goal may contribute to 1, above, or to reducing harassment takes only). 4. A reduction in the intensity of exposures (either total number or number at biologically important time or location) to activities expected to result in the take of marine mammals (this goal may contribute to 1, above, or to reducing the severity of harassment takes only). 5. Avoidance or minimization of adverse effects to marine mammal habitat, paying special attention to the food base, activities that block or limit passage to or from biologically important areas, permanent destruction of habitat, or temporary destruction/disturbance of habitat during a biologically important time. 6. For monitoring directly related to mitigation--an increase in the probability of detecting marine mammals, thus allowing for more effective implementation of the mitigation. Based on our evaluation of Point Blue's proposed measures, we have determined that the mitigation measures provide the means of effecting the least practicable impact on marine mammal species or stocks and their habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar significance. Proposed Monitoring In order to issue an incidental take authorization for an activity, section 101(a)(5)(D) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act states that we must set forth ``requirements pertaining to the monitoring and reporting of such taking.'' The Act's implementing regulations at 50 CFR 216.104(a)(13) indicate that requests for an incidental take authorization must include the suggested means of accomplishing the necessary monitoring and reporting that will result in increased knowledge of the species and our expectations of the level of taking or impacts on populations of marine mammals present in the action area. Monitoring measures prescribed by NMFS should accomplish one or more of the following general goals: 1. An increase in the probability of detecting marine mammals, both within the mitigation zone (thus allowing for more effective implementation of the mitigation) and in general to generate more data to contribute to the analyses mentioned later; 2. An increase in our understanding of how many marine mammals are likely to be exposed to levels of potential stressor(s) associated with the action (e.g., sound or visual stimuli) that we associate with specific adverse effects, such as behavioral harassment, TTS, or PTS; 3. An increase in our understanding of how marine mammals respond to stimuli expected to result in take and how anticipated adverse effects on [[Page 10070]] individuals (in different ways and to varying degrees) may impact the population, species, or stock (specifically through effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival) through any of the following methods:Behavioral observations in the presence of stimuli compared to observations in the absence of stimuli (need to be able to accurately predict received level, distance from source, and other pertinent information); Physiological measurements in the presence of stimuli compared to observations in the absence of stimuli (need to be able to accurately predict received level, distance from source, and other pertinent information); Distribution and/or abundance comparisons in times or areas with concentrated stimuli versus times or areas without stimuli; 4. An increased knowledge of the affected species; and 5. An increase in our understanding of the effectiveness of certain mitigation and monitoring measures. As part of its 2015-2016 application, Point Blue proposes to sponsor marine mammal monitoring during the present project, in order to implement the mitigation measures that require real-time monitoring, and to satisfy the monitoring requirements of the incidental harassment authorization. The Point Blue researchers will monitor the area for pinnipeds during all research activities. Monitoring activities will consist of conducting and recording observations on pinnipeds within the vicinity of the proposed research areas. The monitoring notes would provide dates, location, species, the researcher's activity, behavioral state, numbers of animals that were alert or moved greater than one meter, and numbers of pinnipeds that flushed into the water. Point Blue has complied with the monitoring requirements under the previous authorizations for the 2007 through 2014 seasons. The results from previous Point Blue's monitoring reports support our findings that the proposed mitigation measures, which we also required under the 2007-2014 Authorizations provide the means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact on the species or stock. Point Blue will submit a monitoring report on the January 31, 2014 through January 30, 2015 research period by April 2015. Upon receipt and review, we will post this annual report on our Web site at http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental/research.htm. Proposed Reporting Point Blue must submit a draft final report to NMFS' Office of Protected Resources within 60 days after the conclusion of the 2016 field season. The report will include a summary of the information gathered pursuant to the monitoring requirements set forth in the Authorization. Point Blue will submit a final report to the Chief, Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, within 30 days after receiving comments from NMFS on the draft final report. If Point Blue does not receive any comments from NMFS on the draft report, NMFS and Point Blue will consider the draft final report to be the final report. Estimated Take by Incidental Harassment Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the Marine Mammal Protection Act defines ``harassment'' as: Any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering [Level B harassment]. NMFS proposes to authorize take by Level B harassment only for the proposed seabird research activities on Southeast Farallon Island, A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island, and Point Reyes National Seashore. Acoustic (i.e., increased sound) and visual stimuli generated during these proposed activities may have the potential to cause marine mammals in the harbor area to experience temporary, short-term changes in behavior. Based on Point Blue's previous research experiences, with the same activities conducted in the proposed research area, and on marine mammal research activities in these areas, we estimate that approximately 9,871 California sea lions, 343 harbor seals, 196 northern elephant seals, and 106 Steller sea lions could be affected by Level B behavioral harassment over the course of the effective period of the proposed Authorization. The authorized take differs from Point Blue's original request for California sea lions (10,092), northern elephant seals (261), harbor seals (526) and Steller sea lions (185). NMFS bases these new estimates on historical data from previous monitoring reports and anecdotal data for the same activities conducted in the proposed research area. In brief, for each species, we created a statistical model to derive an estimate of the average annual increase of reported take based on a best fit regression analysis (i.e., linear or polynomial regression) of reported take from 2007 to 2013. Next, we added the predicted annual increase in take to a baseline of take reported for 2013-2014 season to project the estimated take for each species for the 2015-2016 Authorization. We carried through the same predicted annual increase in take for future Authorizations (2014-2017) to obtain a mean projected take for each species. Last, we analyzed the reported take for each activity by calculating the upper bound of the 99 percent confidence interval of the mean reported take (2007-2013) and mean projected take (2014-2017) for each species. Our use of the upper confidence interval represents the best available information that supports our precautionary deliberation of how much take could occur annually. There is no evidence that Point Blue's planned activities could result in injury, serious injury or mortality within the action area. Moreover, the required mitigation and monitoring measures will minimize further any potential risk for injury, serious injury, or mortality. Thus, we do not authorize any injury, serious injury or mortality. We expect all potential takes to fall under the category of Level B harassment only. Encouraging and Coordinating Research Point Blue will continue to coordinate monitoring of pinnipeds during the research activities occurring on Southeast Farallon Island, A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island, and Point Reyes National Seashore. Point Blue conducts bone fide research on marine mammals, the results of which may contribute to the basic knowledge of marine mammal biology or ecology, or are likely to identify, evaluate, or resolve conservation problems. Negligible impact is ``an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival.'' The lack of likely adverse effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival (i.e., population level effects) forms the basis of a negligible impact finding. In addition to considering estimates of the number of marine mammals that might be ``taken'' through behavioral harassment, NMFS must consider other factors, such as the likely nature of any responses (their intensity, duration, etc.), the context of any responses (critical reproductive time or location, feeding, migration, etc.), as well as the number and nature of estimated Level A [[Page 10071]] harassment takes, the number of estimated mortalities, effects on habitat, and the status of the species. In making a negligible impact determination, we consider: (1) The number of anticipated injuries, serious injuries, or mortalities; (2) The number, nature, and intensity, and duration of Level B harassment; (3) The context in which the takes occur (e.g., impacts to areas of significance, impacts to local populations, and cumulative impacts when taking into account successive/contemporaneous actions when added to baseline data); (4) The status of stock or species of marine mammals (i.e., depleted, not depleted, decreasing, increasing, stable, impact relative to the size of the population); (5) Impacts on habitat affecting rates of recruitment/survival; and (6) The effectiveness of monitoring and mitigation measures. For reasons stated previously in this document and based on the following factors, NMFS does not expect Point Blue's specified activities to cause long-term behavioral disturbance, abandonment of the haulout area, injury, serious injury, or mortality: (1) The effects of the pinniped and seabird research activities would be limited to short-term startle responses and localized behavioral changes due to the short and sporadic duration of the research activities. Minor and brief responses, such as short-duration startle or alert reactions, are not likely to constitute disruption of behavioral patterns, such as migration, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering. (2) The availability of alternate areas for pinnipeds to avoid the resultant acoustic and visual disturbances from the research operations. Results from previous monitoring reports also show that the pinnipeds returned to the various sites and did not permanently abandon haul-out sites after Point Blue conducted their pinniped and research activities. (3) There is no potential for large-scale movements leading to injury, serious injury, or mortality because the researchers must delay ingress into the landing areas until after the pinnipeds present have slowly entered the water. (4) The limited access of Point Blue's researchers to Southeast Farallon Island, A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island, and Point Reyes National Seashore during the pupping season. We do not anticipate that any injuries, serious injuries, or mortalities would occur as a result of Point Blue's proposed activities, and we do not authorize injury, serious injury or mortality. These species may exhibit behavioral modifications, including temporarily vacating the area during the proposed seabird and pinniped research activities to avoid the resultant acoustic and visual disturbances. Further, these proposed activities would not take place in areas of significance for marine mammal feeding, resting, breeding, or calving and would not adversely impact marine mammal habitat. Due to the nature, degree, and context of the behavioral harassment anticipated, the activities are not expected to impact annual rates of recruitment or survival. NMFS does not expect pinnipeds to permanently abandon any area that is surveyed by researchers, as is evidenced by continued presence of pinnipeds at the sites during annual monitoring counts. Based on the analysis contained herein of the likely effects of the specified activity on marine mammals and their habitat, and taking into consideration the implementation of the proposed mitigation and monitoring measures, NMFS finds that the total marine mammal take from Point Blue's seabird research activities will not adversely affect annual rates of recruitment or survival and therefore will have a negligible impact on the affected species or stocks. Small Numbers As mentioned previously, NMFS estimates that four species of marine mammals could be potentially affected by Level B harassment over the course of the proposed Authorization. Because these are maximum estimates, actual take numbers are likely to be lower, as some animals may select other haulout sites the day the researchers are present. For each species, these numbers are small numbers (each, less than or equal to two percent) relative to the population size. These incidental harassment numbers represent approximately 3.33 percent of the U.S. stock of California sea lion, 1.74 percent of the California stock of Pacific harbor seal, 0.16 percent of the California breeding stock of northern elephant seal, and 0.17 percent of the eastern distinct population segment of Steller sea lion. Impact on Availability of Affected Species or Stock for Taking for Subsistence Uses Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA also requires us to determine that the taking will not have an unmitigable adverse effect on the availability of marine mammal species or stocks for subsistence use. There are no relevant subsistence uses of marine mammals implicated by this action. Thus, NMFS has determined that the total taking of affected species or stocks would not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of such species or stocks for taking for subsistence purposes. Endangered Species Act On October 23, 2013 NMFS announced the removal of the eastern distinct population segment of Steller sea lions from the list of threatened species under the ESA. No marine mammal species listed under the ESA are anticipated to occur in the action area. Therefore, NMFS has determined that a section 7 consultation under the ESA is not required. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) In 2014, we prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) analyzing the potential effects to the human environment from NMFS' issuance of a proposed Authorization to Point Blue for their seabird research activities. In January 2014, NMFS issued a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) on the issuance of an Authorization for Point Blue's research activities in accordance with section 6.01 of the NOAA Administrative Order 216-6 (Environmental Review Procedures for Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act, May 20, 1999). Point Blue's proposed activities and impacts for 2015-2016 are within the scope of the 2014 EA and FONSI. NMFS has reviewed the 2014 EA and determined that there are no new direct, indirect, or cumulative impacts to the human and natural environment associated with the Authorization requiring evaluation in a supplemental EA and NMFS, therefore, reaffirms the 2014 FONSI. Authorization As a result of these determinations, we have issued an Authorization to Point Blue for the take of marine mammals incidental to proposed seabird and pinniped research activities, provided they incorporate the previously mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and reporting requirements. Dated: February 3, 2015. Donna S. Wieting, Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2015-03849 Filed 2-24-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
![10066 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 37 / Wednesday, February 25, 2015 / Notices
removal of 35 existing concrete piles Small Number incidental to its waterfront repair
and installation of a total of 61 steel Based on analyses provided above, it project at Station Monterey in
piles ranging from 18 inches to 30 is estimated that approximately 260 California, provided the previously
inches in diameter and 24 plastic piles California sea lions and 260 Pacific mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and
of 18-inch diameter. The duration for harbor seals could be exposed to reporting requirements are incorporated.
pile removal is expected to be fewer received noise levels that could cause Dated: February 19, 2015.
than three days and the duration for pile Level B behavioral harassment from the Donna S. Wieting,
driving is expected to be fewer than 10 proposed construction work at the Director, Office of Protected Resources,
days, for a total of 13 days of activity. WETA Central Bay Operations and National Marine Fisheries Service.
The duration for removing each pile Maintenance Facility in Alameda, CA. [FR Doc. 2015–03850 Filed 2–24–15; 8:45 am]
would be about 30 minutes, and the These numbers represent approximately
duration for driving each pile would be BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
0.06% and 0.86% of the stocks and
about 10 to 30 minutes for impact steel populations of these species that could
pile driving and about 10 to 20 minutes be affected by Level B behavioral
for plastic vibratory pile driving. These DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
harassment, respectively (see Table 4
low-intensity, localized, and short-term above), which are small percentages National Oceanic and Atmospheric
noise exposures may cause brief startle relative to the total populations of the Administration
reactions or short-term behavioral affected species or stocks.
modification by the animals. These RIN 0648–XD660
Based on the analysis contained
reactions and behavioral changes are herein of the likely effects of the
expected to subside quickly when the Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to
specified activity on marine mammals Specified Activities; Seabird Research
exposures cease. Moreover, the and their habitat, and taking into
proposed mitigation and monitoring Activities in Central California, 2015–
consideration the implementation of the 2016
measures are expected to reduce mitigation and monitoring measures,
potential exposures and behavioral which are expected to reduce the AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
modifications even further. number of marine mammals potentially Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Additionally, no important feeding and/ affected by the proposed action, NMFS Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
or reproductive areas for marine finds that small numbers of marine Commerce.
mammals are known to be near the mammals will be taken relative to the ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental
proposed action area. Therefore, the populations of the affected species or harassment authorization.
take resulting from the proposed Central stocks.
Bay Operations and Maintenance SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Project is not reasonably expected to, Impact on Availability of Affected Marine Mammal Protection Act
and is not reasonably likely to, Species for Taking for Subsistence Uses (MMPA) regulations, we hereby give
adversely affect the marine mammal There are no subsistence uses of notification that the National Marine
species or stocks through effects on marine mammals in the proposed Fisheries Service has issued an
annual rates of recruitment or survival. project area, and thus no subsistence Incidental Harassment Authorization
The Project also is not expected to uses impacted by this action. Therefore, (IHA) to Point Blue Conservation
have significant adverse effects on NMFS has determined that the total Science (Point Blue), to take marine
affected marine mammals’ habitat, as taking of affected species or stocks mammals, by Level B harassment,
analyzed in detail in the ‘‘Anticipated would not have an unmitigable adverse incidental to conducting seabird and
Effects on Marine Mammal Habitat’’ impact on the availability of such pinniped research activities in central
section in the Federal Register notice species or stocks for taking for California, January 2015 through
(79 FR 55479; September 17, 2014). The subsistence purposes. January 2016.
project activities would not modify DATES: Effective January 31, 2015,
existing marine mammal habitat. The Endangered Species Act (ESA)
through January 30, 2016.
activities may cause some fish to leave No species listed under the ESA are ADDRESSES: The public may obtain an
the area of disturbance, thus temporarily expected to be affected by these
impacting marine mammals’ foraging electronic copy of the Point Blue’s
activities. Therefore, NMFS has application, supporting documentation,
opportunities in a limited portion of the determined that a section 7 consultation
foraging range, but because of the short the authorization, and a list of the
under the ESA is not required. references cited in this document by
duration of the activities and the
relatively small area of the habitat that National Environmental Policy Act visiting: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
may be affected, the impacts to marine (NEPA) permits/incidental/research.htm. In the
mammal habitat are not expected to NMFS prepared an Environmental case of problems accessing these
cause significant or long-term negative Assessment (EA) and analyzed the documents, please call the contact listed
consequences. potential impacts to marine mammals here (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
Based on the analysis contained CONTACT).
that would result from WETA’s Central
herein of the likely effects of the The Environmental Assessment and
Bay Operations and Maintenance
specified activity on marine mammals associated Finding of No Significant
Facility project in Alameda, California.
and their habitat, and taking into Impact, prepared pursuant to the
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Therefore, A Finding of No Significant
consideration the implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act of
Impact (FONSI) was issued for this
proposed monitoring and mitigation 1969, are also available at the same site.
action. A copy of the EA and FONSI is
measures, NMFS finds that the total available upon request. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
marine mammal take from WETA’s Jeannine Cody, Office of Protected
Central Bay Operations and Authorization Resources, NMFS (301) 427–8401.
Maintenance Facility Project will have a NMFS has issued an IHA to USCG for SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
negligible impact on the affected marine the potential harassment of small 101(a)(5)(D) of the Marine Mammal
mammal species or stocks. numbers of marine mammal species Protection Act (MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1361
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Feb 24, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM 25FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_10103/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 37 / Wednesday, February 25, 2015 / Notices 10067
et seq.) directs the Secretary of consultation with the Gulf of the maximum frequency of three 15-minute
Commerce to authorize, upon request, Farallones National Marine Sanctuary. visits. Daily observations of breeding
the incidental, but not intentional, The proposed research activities common murre (Uria aalge) colonies
taking of small numbers of marine would occur for one year, January 31, would occur at a maximum frequency of
mammals of a species or population 2015, through January 30, 2016, and a single five-hour visit. These activities
stock, by United States citizens who would involve annual monitoring and usually involve one or two observers
engage in a specified activity (other than censusing of seabird colonies; seabird conducting daily censuses of seabirds or
commercial fishing) within a specified nesting habitat observations; nesting conducting mark/recapture studies of
geographical region if: (1) We make burrows restoration; breeding elephant breeding seabirds on the island.
certain findings; (2) the taking is limited seals observations; and the periodic Field Station Resupply on Southeast
to harassment; and (3) we provide a resupply of a field station. Farallon Island: Resupply of the field
notice of a proposed authorization to the These proposed activities would station would occur once every two
public for review. occur in the vicinity of pinniped haul weeks at a maximum frequency of 26
We shall grant an authorization for out sites and could likely result in the visits annually. Resupply activities
the incidental taking of small numbers incidental take of marine mammals. We involve personnel approaching either
of marine mammals if we find that the anticipate take, by Level B Harassment the North Landing or East Landing by
taking will have a negligible impact on only, of individuals of either California motorboat to offload supplies.
the species or stock(s), and will not have sea lions (Zalophus californianus), Pinniped Research in Central
an unmitigable adverse impact on the Pacific harbor seals (Phoca vitulina), California: Surveys of breeding northern
availability of the species or stock(s) for northern elephant seals (Mirounga elephant seals on Southeast Farallon
subsistence uses (where relevant). Also, angustirostris), or Steller sea lions and Año Nuevo Islands, the coastline of
the authorization must set forth the (Eumetopias jubatus) to result from the Point Reyes Peninsula, San Francisco
permissible methods of taking and specified activity. Bay, and the Russian River, would occur
requirements pertaining to the This is the organization’s sixth in early December and late February,
monitoring and reporting of such request for an Authorization. To date, annually. At least three researchers
takings. We have defined ‘‘negligible we have issued an Incidental would visit the sites at a maximum
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as ‘‘an Harassment Authorization frequency of five times per year.
impact resulting from the specified (Authorization) to Point Blue (formerly Seabird Research and Field Supply on
activity that cannot be reasonably known as PRBO Conservation Science) Año Nuevo Island: Researchers would
expected to, and is not reasonably likely for the conduct of similar activities from monitor seabird burrow nesting habitat
to, adversely affect the species or stock 2007 to 2013 (72 FR 71121, December quality, conduct habitat restoration, and
through effects on annual rates of 14, 2007; 73 FR 77011, December 18, resupply the field station from April
recruitment or survival.’’ 2008; 75 FR 8677, February 19, 2010; 77 through August at a maximum
Except with respect to certain FR 73989, December 7, 2012, 78 FR frequency of 20 visits annually.
activities not pertinent here, the MMPA 66686, November 6, 2013). Occasionally, researchers would also
defines ‘‘harassment’’ as: Any act of conduct intermittent visits to the island
pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) Description of the Specified Activity throughout the year. These activities
has the potential to injure a marine Overview involve two to three researchers
mammal or marine mammal stock in the accessing the island by motorboat.
wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has Point Blue proposes to monitor and Seabird Research on Point Reyes
the potential to disturb a marine census seabird colonies; observe seabird National Seashore: The National Park
mammal or marine mammal stock in the nesting habitat; restore nesting burrows; Service in collaboration with Point Blue
wild by causing disruption of behavioral observe breeding elephant and harbor monitors seabird breeding and roosting
patterns, including, but not limited to, seals; and resupply a field station colonies; conducts habitat restoration;
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, annually in central California (i.e., removes non-native plants; monitors
feeding, or sheltering [Level B Southeast Farallon Island, West End intertidal areas; and maintains coastal
harassment]. Island, Año Nuevo Island, Point Reyes dune habitat. Seabird monitoring
National Seashore, San Francisco Bay, usually involves one or two observers
Summary of Request and the Russian River in Sonoma conducting the survey by small boats
We received an application on July County). along the shoreline. Researchers would
30, 2014, from Point Blue requesting the The purpose of the seabird research is visit the site at a maximum frequency of
taking by harassment of small numbers to continue a 30-year monitoring 20 times per year.
of marine mammals incidental to program of the region’s seabird
conducting seabird and pinniped populations. Point Blue’s long-term Specified Geographic Region
research activities on Southeast Farallon pinniped research program monitors Point Blue will conduct their research
Island, Año Nuevo Island, Point Reyes pinniped colonies to understand activities within the vicinity of
National Seashore, San Francisco Bay, elephant and harbor seal population pinniped haul out sites in the following
and the Russian River in central dynamics and to contribute to the locations:
California. We determined the conservation of both species. South Farallones Islands: The South
application complete and adequate on Farallon Islands consist of Southeast
Dates and Duration Farallon Island located at 37°41′54.32″
December 7, 2014.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Point Blue, along with partners The Authorization would be effective N; 123° 0′8.33″ W and West End Island.
Oikonos Ecosystem Knowledge, Point from January 31, 2015 through January The South Farallon Islands have a land
Reyes National Seashore with the 30, 2016. Following is a brief summary area of approximately 120 acres (0.49
National Park Service, and the Gulf of of the dates and duration of the square kilometers (km)) and are part of
the Farallones National Marine activities. the Farallon National Wildlife Refuge.
Sanctuary would conduct this research Seabird Research on Southeast The islands are located near the edge of
under cooperative agreements with the Farallon Island: Daily observations of the continental shelf 28 miles (mi) (45.1
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in seabird colonies would occur at a km) west of San Francisco, CA, and lie
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Feb 24, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM 25FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_10103/page/2.svg)
![10070 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 37 / Wednesday, February 25, 2015 / Notices
individuals (in different ways and to Resources within 60 days after the of reported take based on a best fit
varying degrees) may impact the conclusion of the 2016 field season. The regression analysis (i.e., linear or
population, species, or stock report will include a summary of the polynomial regression) of reported take
(specifically through effects on annual information gathered pursuant to the from 2007 to 2013. Next, we added the
rates of recruitment or survival) through monitoring requirements set forth in the predicted annual increase in take to a
any of the following methods: Authorization. baseline of take reported for 2013–2014
• Behavioral observations in the Point Blue will submit a final report season to project the estimated take for
presence of stimuli compared to to the Chief, Permits and Conservation each species for the 2015–2016
observations in the absence of stimuli Division, Office of Protected Resources, Authorization. We carried through the
(need to be able to accurately predict within 30 days after receiving comments same predicted annual increase in take
received level, distance from source, from NMFS on the draft final report. If for future Authorizations (2014–2017) to
and other pertinent information); Point Blue does not receive any obtain a mean projected take for each
• Physiological measurements in the comments from NMFS on the draft species. Last, we analyzed the reported
presence of stimuli compared to report, NMFS and Point Blue will take for each activity by calculating the
observations in the absence of stimuli consider the draft final report to be the upper bound of the 99 percent
(need to be able to accurately predict final report. confidence interval of the mean
received level, distance from source, Estimated Take by Incidental reported take (2007–2013) and mean
and other pertinent information); Harassment projected take (2014–2017) for each
• Distribution and/or abundance species. Our use of the upper
comparisons in times or areas with Except with respect to certain confidence interval represents the best
concentrated stimuli versus times or activities not pertinent here, the Marine available information that supports our
areas without stimuli; Mammal Protection Act defines precautionary deliberation of how much
4. An increased knowledge of the ‘‘harassment’’ as: Any act of pursuit, take could occur annually.
affected species; and torment, or annoyance which (i) has the There is no evidence that Point Blue’s
5. An increase in our understanding potential to injure a marine mammal or planned activities could result in injury,
of the effectiveness of certain mitigation marine mammal stock in the wild [Level serious injury or mortality within the
and monitoring measures. A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential action area. Moreover, the required
As part of its 2015–2016 application, to disturb a marine mammal or marine mitigation and monitoring measures
Point Blue proposes to sponsor marine mammal stock in the wild by causing will minimize further any potential risk
mammal monitoring during the present disruption of behavioral patterns, for injury, serious injury, or mortality.
project, in order to implement the including, but not limited to, migration, Thus, we do not authorize any injury,
mitigation measures that require real- breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or serious injury or mortality. We expect
time monitoring, and to satisfy the sheltering [Level B harassment]. all potential takes to fall under the
monitoring requirements of the NMFS proposes to authorize take by category of Level B harassment only.
incidental harassment authorization. Level B harassment only for the
The Point Blue researchers will monitor proposed seabird research activities on Encouraging and Coordinating
Southeast Farallon Island, Año Nuevo Research
the area for pinnipeds during all
research activities. Monitoring activities Island, and Point Reyes National Point Blue will continue to coordinate
will consist of conducting and recording Seashore. Acoustic (i.e., increased monitoring of pinnipeds during the
observations on pinnipeds within the sound) and visual stimuli generated research activities occurring on
vicinity of the proposed research areas. during these proposed activities may Southeast Farallon Island, Año Nuevo
The monitoring notes would provide have the potential to cause marine Island, and Point Reyes National
dates, location, species, the researcher’s mammals in the harbor area to Seashore. Point Blue conducts bone fide
activity, behavioral state, numbers of experience temporary, short-term research on marine mammals, the
animals that were alert or moved greater changes in behavior. results of which may contribute to the
than one meter, and numbers of Based on Point Blue’s previous basic knowledge of marine mammal
pinnipeds that flushed into the water. research experiences, with the same biology or ecology, or are likely to
Point Blue has complied with the activities conducted in the proposed identify, evaluate, or resolve
monitoring requirements under the research area, and on marine mammal conservation problems.
previous authorizations for the 2007 research activities in these areas, we Negligible impact is ‘‘an impact
through 2014 seasons. The results from estimate that approximately 9,871 resulting from the specified activity that
previous Point Blue’s monitoring California sea lions, 343 harbor seals, cannot be reasonably expected to, and is
reports support our findings that the 196 northern elephant seals, and 106 not reasonably likely to, adversely affect
proposed mitigation measures, which Steller sea lions could be affected by the species or stock through effects on
we also required under the 2007–2014 Level B behavioral harassment over the annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
Authorizations provide the means of course of the effective period of the The lack of likely adverse effects on
effecting the least practicable adverse proposed Authorization. annual rates of recruitment or survival
impact on the species or stock. The authorized take differs from Point (i.e., population level effects) forms the
Point Blue will submit a monitoring Blue’s original request for California sea basis of a negligible impact finding.
report on the January 31, 2014 through lions (10,092), northern elephant seals In addition to considering estimates of
(261), harbor seals (526) and Steller sea the number of marine mammals that
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
January 30, 2015 research period by
April 2015. Upon receipt and review, lions (185). NMFS bases these new might be ‘‘taken’’ through behavioral
we will post this annual report on our estimates on historical data from harassment, NMFS must consider other
Web site at http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/ previous monitoring reports and factors, such as the likely nature of any
pr/permits/incidental/research.htm. anecdotal data for the same activities responses (their intensity, duration,
conducted in the proposed research etc.), the context of any responses
Proposed Reporting area. In brief, for each species, we (critical reproductive time or location,
Point Blue must submit a draft final created a statistical model to derive an feeding, migration, etc.), as well as the
report to NMFS’ Office of Protected estimate of the average annual increase number and nature of estimated Level A
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Feb 24, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM 25FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_10103/page/5.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 37 / Wednesday, February 25, 2015 / Notices 10071
harassment takes, the number of mortality. These species may exhibit has determined that the total taking of
estimated mortalities, effects on habitat, behavioral modifications, including affected species or stocks would not
and the status of the species. temporarily vacating the area during the have an unmitigable adverse impact on
In making a negligible impact proposed seabird and pinniped research the availability of such species or stocks
determination, we consider: activities to avoid the resultant acoustic for taking for subsistence purposes.
(1) The number of anticipated and visual disturbances. Further, these
injuries, serious injuries, or mortalities; proposed activities would not take place Endangered Species Act
(2) The number, nature, and intensity, in areas of significance for marine
and duration of Level B harassment; On October 23, 2013 NMFS
mammal feeding, resting, breeding, or
(3) The context in which the takes calving and would not adversely impact announced the removal of the eastern
occur (e.g., impacts to areas of marine mammal habitat. Due to the distinct population segment of Steller
significance, impacts to local nature, degree, and context of the sea lions from the list of threatened
populations, and cumulative impacts behavioral harassment anticipated, the species under the ESA. No marine
when taking into account successive/ activities are not expected to impact mammal species listed under the ESA
contemporaneous actions when added annual rates of recruitment or survival. are anticipated to occur in the action
to baseline data); NMFS does not expect pinnipeds to area. Therefore, NMFS has determined
(4) The status of stock or species of permanently abandon any area that is that a section 7 consultation under the
marine mammals (i.e., depleted, not surveyed by researchers, as is evidenced ESA is not required.
depleted, decreasing, increasing, stable, by continued presence of pinnipeds at
impact relative to the size of the the sites during annual monitoring National Environmental Policy Act
population); counts. Based on the analysis contained (NEPA)
(5) Impacts on habitat affecting rates herein of the likely effects of the In 2014, we prepared an
of recruitment/survival; and specified activity on marine mammals
(6) The effectiveness of monitoring Environmental Assessment (EA)
and their habitat, and taking into
and mitigation measures. analyzing the potential effects to the
consideration the implementation of the
For reasons stated previously in this proposed mitigation and monitoring human environment from NMFS’
document and based on the following measures, NMFS finds that the total issuance of a proposed Authorization to
factors, NMFS does not expect Point marine mammal take from Point Blue’s Point Blue for their seabird research
Blue’s specified activities to cause long- seabird research activities will not activities. In January 2014, NMFS issued
term behavioral disturbance, adversely affect annual rates of a Finding of No Significant Impact
abandonment of the haulout area, recruitment or survival and therefore (FONSI) on the issuance of an
injury, serious injury, or mortality: will have a negligible impact on the Authorization for Point Blue’s research
(1) The effects of the pinniped and affected species or stocks. activities in accordance with section
seabird research activities would be 6.01 of the NOAA Administrative Order
limited to short-term startle responses Small Numbers
216–6 (Environmental Review
and localized behavioral changes due to As mentioned previously, NMFS Procedures for Implementing the
the short and sporadic duration of the estimates that four species of marine National Environmental Policy Act, May
research activities. Minor and brief mammals could be potentially affected 20, 1999). Point Blue’s proposed
responses, such as short-duration startle by Level B harassment over the course activities and impacts for 2015–2016 are
or alert reactions, are not likely to of the proposed Authorization. Because within the scope of the 2014 EA and
constitute disruption of behavioral these are maximum estimates, actual
FONSI. NMFS has reviewed the 2014
patterns, such as migration, nursing, take numbers are likely to be lower, as
EA and determined that there are no
breeding, feeding, or sheltering. some animals may select other haulout
(2) The availability of alternate areas sites the day the researchers are present. new direct, indirect, or cumulative
for pinnipeds to avoid the resultant For each species, these numbers are impacts to the human and natural
acoustic and visual disturbances from small numbers (each, less than or equal environment associated with the
the research operations. Results from to two percent) relative to the Authorization requiring evaluation in a
previous monitoring reports also show population size. These incidental supplemental EA and NMFS, therefore,
that the pinnipeds returned to the harassment numbers represent reaffirms the 2014 FONSI.
various sites and did not permanently approximately 3.33 percent of the U.S. Authorization
abandon haul-out sites after Point Blue stock of California sea lion, 1.74 percent
conducted their pinniped and research of the California stock of Pacific harbor As a result of these determinations,
activities. seal, 0.16 percent of the California we have issued an Authorization to
(3) There is no potential for large- breeding stock of northern elephant Point Blue for the take of marine
scale movements leading to injury, seal, and 0.17 percent of the eastern mammals incidental to proposed
serious injury, or mortality because the distinct population segment of Steller seabird and pinniped research activities,
researchers must delay ingress into the sea lion. provided they incorporate the
landing areas until after the pinnipeds previously mentioned mitigation,
present have slowly entered the water. Impact on Availability of Affected
Species or Stock for Taking for monitoring, and reporting requirements.
(4) The limited access of Point Blue’s
researchers to Southeast Farallon Island, Subsistence Uses Dated: February 3, 2015.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Año Nuevo Island, and Point Reyes Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA Donna S. Wieting,
National Seashore during the pupping also requires us to determine that the Director, Office of Protected Resources,
season. taking will not have an unmitigable National Marine Fisheries Service.
We do not anticipate that any injuries, adverse effect on the availability of [FR Doc. 2015–03849 Filed 2–24–15; 8:45 am]
serious injuries, or mortalities would marine mammal species or stocks for
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
occur as a result of Point Blue’s subsistence use. There are no relevant
proposed activities, and we do not subsistence uses of marine mammals
authorize injury, serious injury or implicated by this action. Thus, NMFS
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Feb 24, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM 25FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_10103/page/6.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-18 13:09:26
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 13:09:26
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice; issuance of an incidental harassment authorization. | |
| Dates | Effective January 31, 2015, through January 30, 2016. | |
| Contact | Jeannine Cody, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS (301) 427-8401. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 10066 | |
| RIN Number | 0648-XD66 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR