80 FR 10590 - Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Passaic River, Rutherford, NJ

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 39 (February 27, 2015)

Page Range		10590-10591
FR Document		2015-04152

The Coast Guard is removing the existing drawbridge operation regulation for the drawbridge across the Passaic River, mile 11.8, at Rutherford, New Jersey. The drawbridge was converted to a fixed bridge in October 2010, and the operating regulation is no longer applicable or necessary.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 39 (Friday, February 27, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 39 (Friday, February 27, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10590-10591]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04152]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2014-1070]
RIN 1625-AA09


Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Passaic River, Rutherford, NJ

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is removing the existing drawbridge operation 
regulation for the drawbridge across the Passaic River, mile 11.8, at 
Rutherford, New Jersey. The drawbridge was converted to a fixed bridge 
in October 2010, and the operating regulation is no longer applicable 
or necessary.

DATES: This rule is effective February 27, 2015.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this final rule, [USCG-2014-1070] is 
available at http://www.regulations.gov. Type the docket number in the 
``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the 
line associated with this final rule. You may also visit the Docket 
Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the 
Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Mr. Joe Arca, Project Officer, First Coast Guard District 
Bridge Program, telephone 212-514-4336, email [email protected]. If 
you have questions on viewing the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program 
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Regulatory History and Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this final rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the 
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision 
authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because the Route 3 Bridge, that once 
required draw operations in 33 CFR 117.739(n), was converted to a fixed 
bridge in October 2010. Therefore, the regulation is no longer 
applicable and shall be removed from publication. It is unnecessary to 
publish an NPRM because this regulatory action does not purport to 
place any restrictions on mariners but rather removes a restriction 
that has no further use or value.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective in less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register. The bridge has been a fixed bridge 
for 4 years and this rule merely requires an administrative change to 
the Federal Register, in order to omit a regulatory requirement that is 
no longer applicable or necessary.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The Route 3 Bridge across the Passaic River, mile 11.8, was 
converted to a fixed bridge in 2010. It has come to the attention of 
the Coast Guard that the governing regulation for this drawbridge was 
never removed subsequent to the conversion to a fixed bridge. The 
conversion of this drawbridge necessitates the removal of the 
drawbridge operation regulation, 33 CFR 117.739(n), pertaining to the 
former drawbridge.
    The purpose of this rule is to remove paragraph 33 CFR 117.739(n), 
that refers to the Route 3 Bridge at mile 11.8, from the Code of 
Federal Regulations since it governs a bridge that is no longer able to 
be opened.

C. Discussion of Rule

    The Coast Guard is changing the regulation in 33 CFR 117.739 by 
removing restrictions and the regulatory burden related to the draw 
operations for this bridge that is no longer a drawbridge. The change 
removes paragraph 117.739(n) of the regulation which governs the Route 
3 Bridge and redesignates (o) through (t) as (n) through (s). This 
Final Rule seeks to update the Code of Federal Regulations by removing 
language that governs the operation of the Route 3 Bridge, which in 
fact no longer is a drawbridge. This change does not affect waterway or 
land traffic. This change does not affect nor does it alter the 
operating schedules in 33 CFR 117.739 that govern the remaining active 
drawbridges on the Passaic River except to redesignate these bridges.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on these statutes or executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as 
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and 
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential 
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order 12866 or under 
section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget 
has not reviewed it under those Orders.
    The Coast Guard does not consider this rule to be ``significant'' 
under that Order because it is an administrative change and does not 
affect the way vessels operate on the waterway.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their

[[Page 10591]]

fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    This rule will have no effect on small entities since this 
drawbridge has been converted to a fixed bridge and the regulation 
governing draw operations for this bridge is no longer applicable. 
There is no new restriction or regulation being imposed by this rule; 
therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities.

3. Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

4. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it does not have implications for federalism.

5. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the ``For Further 
Information Contact'' section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

6. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

7. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

8. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

9. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might 
disproportionately affect children.

10. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

11. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive 
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect 
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

12. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

13. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded 
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not 
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human 
environment. This rule involves the removal of a drawbridge operation 
regulation that is no longer necessary. This rule is categorically 
excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction.
    Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an 
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion 
determination are not required for this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 Bridges.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland 
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

Sec.  117.739  [Amended]

0
2. In Sec.  117.739, remove paragraph (n) and redesignate paragraphs 
(o) through (t) as paragraphs (n) through (s).

    Dated: January 29, 2015.
L.L. Fagan,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2015-04152 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 10591

fields, and governmental jurisdictions Interference with Constitutionally exclusion determination are not
with populations of less than 50,000. Protected Property Rights. required for this rule.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
8. Civil Justice Reform List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
605(b) that this rule will not have a
Bridges.
significant economic impact on a This rule meets applicable standards
substantial number of small entities. in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive For the reasons discussed in the
This rule will have no effect on small Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
entities since this drawbridge has been minimize litigation, eliminate CFR part 117 as follows:
converted to a fixed bridge and the ambiguity, and reduce burden.
regulation governing draw operations PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
9. Protection of Children OPERATION REGULATIONS
for this bridge is no longer applicable.
There is no new restriction or regulation We have analyzed this rule under
■ 1. The authority citation for part 117
being imposed by this rule; therefore, Executive Order 13045, Protection of
continues to read as follows:
the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. Children from Environmental Health
605(b) that this final rule will not have Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
an economically significant rule and Department of Homeland Security Delegation
a significant economic impact on a
No. 0170.1.
substantial number of small entities. does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
3. Collection of Information disproportionately affect children. § 117.739 [Amended]
This rule calls for no new collection ■ 2. In § 117.739, remove paragraph (n)
10. Indian Tribal Governments
of information under the Paperwork and redesignate paragraphs (o) through
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– This rule does not have tribal (t) as paragraphs (n) through (s).
3520). implications under Executive Order Dated: January 29, 2015.
13175, Consultation and Coordination L.L. Fagan,
4. Federalism with Indian Tribal Governments, Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
A rule has implications for federalism because it does not have a substantial First Coast Guard District.
under Executive Order 13132, direct effect on one or more Indian [FR Doc. 2015–04152 Filed 2–26–15; 8:45 am]
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct tribes, on the relationship between the
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
effect on the States, on the relationship Federal Government and Indian tribes,
between the national government and or on the distribution of power and
the States, or on the distribution of responsibilities between the Federal
power and responsibilities among the Government and Indian tribes. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
various levels of government. We have AGENCY
11. Energy Effects
analyzed this rule under that Order and 40 CFR Part 52
have determined that it does not have This action is not a ‘‘significant
implications for federalism. energy action’’ under Executive Order [EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0888; EPA–R05–
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations OAR–2011–0969; EPA–R05–OAR–2012–
5. Protest Activities That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 0991; EPA–R05–OAR–2013–0435; FRL–
Distribution, or Use. 9923–48–Region 5]
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters. 12. Technical Standards Approval and Promulgation of Air
Protesters are asked to contact the Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio;
person listed in the ‘‘For Further This rule does not use technical PSD Infrastructure SIP Requirements
Information Contact’’ section to standards. Therefore, we did not for the 2008 Lead, 2008 Ozone, 2010
coordinate protest activities so that your consider the use of voluntary consensus NO2, and 2010 SO2 NAAQS
message can be received without standards.
jeopardizing the safety or security of AGENCY: Environmental Protection
13. Environment
people, places or vessels. Agency.
We have analyzed this rule under ACTION: Direct final rule.
6. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Department of Homeland Security
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Management Directive 023–01 and SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, Agency (EPA) is approving elements of
Federal agencies to assess the effects of which guides the Coast Guard in state implementation plan (SIP)
their discretionary regulatory actions. In complying with the National submissions from Ohio regarding the
particular, the Act addresses actions Environmental Policy Act of 1969 Prevention of Significant Deterioration
that may result in the expenditure by a (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and (PSD) infrastructure requirements of
State, local, or tribal government, in the have concluded that this action is one section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA)
aggregate, or by the private sector of of a category of actions that do not for the 2008 lead (Pb), 2008 ozone, 2010
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or individually or cumulatively have a nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and 2010 sulfur
more in any one year. Though this rule significant effect on the human dioxide (SO2) National Ambient Air
will not result in such an expenditure, environment. This rule involves the Quality Standards (NAAQS). The
we do discuss the effects of this rule removal of a drawbridge operation infrastructure requirements are designed
elsewhere in this preamble. regulation that is no longer necessary. to ensure that the structural components
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES

This rule is categorically excluded, of each state’s air quality management
7. Taking of Private Property under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of program are adequate to meet the state’s
This rule will not cause a taking of the Instruction. responsibilities under the CAA.
private property or otherwise have Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of DATES: This direct final rule will be
taking implications under Executive the Instruction, an environmental effective April 28, 2015, unless EPA
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and analysis checklist and a categorical receives adverse comments by March

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:12 Feb 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27FER1.SGM 27FER1

Document Created: 2015-12-18 13:14:30
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 13:14:30

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective February 27, 2015.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Mr. Joe Arca, Project Officer, First Coast Guard District Bridge Program, telephone 212-514-4336, email [email protected] If you have questions on viewing the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
FR Citation		80 FR 10590
RIN Number		1625-AA09

80 FR 10590 - Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Passaic River, Rutherford, NJ

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 39 (February 27, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard