80 FR 10704 - National Preparedness for Response Exercise Program (PREP) Guidelines
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 39 (February 27, 2015)
Coast Guard
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 39 (February 27, 2015)
| Page Range | 10704-10710 | |
| FR Document | 2015-04160 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 39 (Friday, February 27, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 10704-10710] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-04160] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard [USCG-2011-1178] National Preparedness for Response Exercise Program (PREP) Guidelines AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Notice and request for comment. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) announces that the updated draft PREP Guidelines are available for public comment. The USCG is publishing this notice on behalf of the National Scheduling Coordination Committee (NSCC), which is comprised of representatives from the USCG; Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) under the Department of Transportation (DOT); and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) under the Department of the Interior (DOI). DATES: Comments must reach USCG by April 28, 2015. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments and additional materials, identified by USCG docket number USCG-2011-1178, using any one of the following methods: (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. (2) Fax: 202-493-2251. (3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329. See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of these methods. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For USCG: Mr. Jonathan Smith, Office of Marine Environmental Response Policy, 202-372-2675. For BSEE: Mr. John Caplis, Oil Spill Preparedness Division, 703- 787-1364. [[Page 10705]] For EPA: Mr. Troy Swackhammer, Office of Emergency Management, Regulation and Implementation Division, 202-564-1966. For PHMSA: Mr. Eddie Murphy, Office of Pipeline Safety, 202-366- 4595. For questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket: Ms. Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, DOT Docket Operations, 202-366-9826. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Public Participation and Request for Comments We encourage you to participate in the revision of the PREP Guidelines by submitting comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any personal information you have provided. Submitting comments: If you submit a comment, please include the docket number (USCG-2011-1178), indicate the specific section of the PREP Guidelines to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but please use only one of these means. We recommend that you include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission. To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type ``USCG-2011-1178'' in the search box, and click ``Search.'' Then click ``Comment Now!'' on the appropriate line. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would like to know that they reached the DOT Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during the comment period. Viewing comments and documents: To view comments as well as documents mentioned in this notice as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type ``USCG-2011-1178'' and click ``Search.'' Then click the ``Open Docket Folder.'' Additional relevant comments are available in docket BSEE-2014-0003 and may be viewed online using the same procedure as for docket USCG-2011-1178. If you do not have access to the Internet, you may view the docket online by visiting the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an agreement with the DOT to use the Docket Management Facility. Privacy Act: Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act and system of records notice regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 3316). Public meeting: We do not currently plan to hold a public meeting, but you may request one using any of the methods listed under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that a public meeting would aid the revision of the PREP Guidelines, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register. II. Acronyms ACP Area Contingency Plan AMPD Average Most Probable Discharge APC Alternative Planning Criteria BSEE Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement CFR Code of Federal Regulations DOI Department of the Interior DOT Department of Transportation EPA Environmental Protection Agency FOSC Federal On-Scene Coordinator FPSO Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading FR Federal Register GIUE Government-Initiated Unannounced Exercise GRPs Geographic Response Plans GRS Geographic Response Strategies HSEEP Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program IMT Incident Management Team MFF Marine Firefighting MMPD Maximum Most Probable Discharge MOA Memorandum of Agreement MODU Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit MOU Memorandum of Understanding NRT National Response Team NSCC National Scheduling Coordination Committee NTV Nontank Vessels OPA 90 Oil Pollution Act of 1990 OSPD Oil Spill Preparedness Division OSRO Oil Spill Removal Organization OSRP Oil Spill Response Plan PHMSA Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PREP Preparedness for Response Exercise Program QI Qualified Individual SMFF Salvage and Marine Firefighting SMT Spill Management Team SONS Spill of National Significance TTX Tabletop Exercise USCG U.S. Coast Guard VRP Vessel Response Plan WCD Worst Case Discharge III. Background On February 22, 2012, the USCG, on behalf of the NSCC, invited comments and suggestions for updating the PREP Guidelines (77 FR 10542). The NSCC received public comments in docket number USCG-2011- 1178, and those comments can be viewed online as described in the ``Public Participation'' section earlier in this document. After considering those comments, the NSCC issued a draft update to the PREP Guidelines. The NSCC also issued a notice (79 FR 16363, March 24, 2014) that announced the availability of the draft update to the PREP Guidelines, invited comment on the draft, and provided responses to the comments received in docket USCG-2011-1178. That second notice (79 FR 16363) was published as a BSEE-issued document in docket BSEE-2014- 0003. The NSCC has considered the comments received in docket BSEE- 2014-0003, and today announces the availability of an updated draft, invites public comment on the updated draft, and responds to comments received in the BSEE docket in response to the March 24, 2014, notice. Although this document responds to comments received in the BSEE docket, all further comments should be directed to the docket USCG- 2011-1178.\1\ The NSCC does not plan to use other dockets for this revision of the PREP Guidelines. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ On July 16, 2014, BSEE published a notice indicating that an updated draft would be made available for public comment in the original USCG docket, USCG-2011-1178 (79 FR 41592). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Summary of Comments and Changes When BSEE, on behalf of the NSCC, requested public review of the first updated draft PREP Guidelines in its March 2014 notice, BSEE received 83 comments from government agencies, regulated communities, private industry, and non-governmental organizations. All of the comments received are posted on http://www.regulations.gov, under docket number BSEE-2014-0003. This document summarizes and responds to those comments that were within the scope of the proposed update. The NSCC has incorporated numerous changes to the draft PREP Guidelines document as a result of these public comments, and has also updated the document to reflect other new planning requirements such as the recent regulatory requirements relating to [[Page 10706]] nontank vessels (NTVs). In the following sections, we summarize the comments that the NSCC received and the changes it has made to the revised update of the PREP Guidelines. A. Summary of Changes Definitions and Terminology: The NSCC has changed certain exercise- related terms in order to harmonize PREP with other national-level exercise programs. In particular, the term ``Spill Management Team (SMT)'' has been replaced by the term ``Incident Management Team (IMT).'' The term ``Tabletop Exercise (TTX)'' has been removed from the PREP terminology and will now simply be referred to as an exercise. For example, an SMT TTX will now be called an IMT exercise. Salvage and Marine Firefighting (SMFF) Additions: The draft PREP Guidelines now include guidance for including SMFF providers and equipment into a plan holder's exercise program, in response to regulatory requirements at 33 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 155.4052. These updates appear throughout the Guidelines in applicable sections. NTV Additions: The PREP Guidelines now include guidance for exercises for NTV response plans, in response to regulatory requirements at 33 CFR 155.5060. Use of Alternative Worst Case Discharges (WCD) Scenarios during IMT Exercises: The draft Guidelines have been revised to allow for alternative WCD scenarios to be exercised. Some Facilities and Complex Facilities have more than one possible WCD, for example a storage tank and a pipeline section. Such plan holders are encouraged to consider adverse environmental impacts and to exercise more than just their largest volume WCD scenario. Exercise Frequency: The draft Guidelines have been updated to ensure consistency among NSCC agencies regarding the frequency of equipment deployment exercises. In particular, the frequency of deployment exercises for equipment that is owned by the facility, operated by Oil Spill Removal Organizations (OSROs), and listed in EPA- regulated plans has been changed from annually to semi-annually. This change will ensure the readiness of equipment that is not regularly used in actual spill response operations. Oil Spill Surveillance and Tracking Systems: USCG and BSEE regulations require plan holders to ensure available resources for oil spill surveillance and tracking. The PREP Guidelines establish a list of the types of equipment to be exercised during internal deployment exercises. This latest version of the Guidelines specifically identifies oil spill surveillance and tracking systems as a type of response equipment to be exercised during internal equipment deployment exercises in order to test the plan holders abilities to effectively support and direct other response activities and equipment, such as the use of dispersants, in-situ burning, mechanical recovery, shoreline protection, or wildlife recovery. Area-level Exercise Cycle: The exercise frequency for Area-level exercises has been changed from three to four years. This change applies only to the Area-level exercise cycle and does not change an industry plan holder's exercise cycle as recommended in the draft PREP Guidelines, nor does it change the frequency of any industry plan holder exercises required by any oil spill planning regulations. B. Summary of Comments and Responses General Comments Additional Time to Review the Guidelines: One commenter asked for an extended review period as they were not aware of the previous posting of the Guidelines in the Federal Register. Response: In addition to the comment in the docket, the NSCC has received numerous comments through other channels requesting additional time to review the Guidelines. This version of the Guidelines is being released today for public comment by the NSCC for a period of sixty days to accommodate the numerous requests. Aligning PREP Terminology and Processes with Other National Exercise Programs: Three commenters recommended aligning the PREP Guidelines with various elements of the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP). Response: The NSCC has decided to adopt certain terminology from HSEEP in order to better align the two programs, especially where HSEEP terms are more reflective of the lexicon used today within the National Incident Management System. As a result, the term ``SMT'' has been replaced by the term ``IMT.'' The term ``TTX'' has also been replaced with the term ``exercise.'' Recommendations for replacing other terms, such as changing deployment ``exercises'' to ``drills,'' were not adopted because the NSCC did not want to introduce confusion by changing established, recognized terms. The NSCC also did not believe it was within the scope of the existing PREP mandate under OPA90 to completely adopt the HSEEP exercise design and evaluation processes. While the NSCC would encourage plan holders to consider adopting various HSEEP best practices, HSEEP procedures are currently not required by any of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA90) implementing regulations established by the NSCC member agencies. Unified Command during PREP Exercises: One commenter stated that the definition of Unified Command in the PREP Guidelines was too broad and should be more constrained to agencies with primary jurisdiction in the incident. Response: The National Response Team (NRT) states in its Technical Assistance Document on Unified Command that for entities to be considered for inclusion within a Unified Command, they should have authority or functional responsibility for an area of responsibility that may be affected by an incident, as well as authority to command, coordinate, or manage a major aspect of the response. The NSCC has clarified the language within the definition to more closely align with the NRT guidance. Use of the Acronym ``OSRO'' in PREP Terminology: One commenter stated that the acronym ``OSRO'' was being used for two different terms and definitions, i.e., ``Oil Spill Removal Organization'' and ``Oil Spill Response Organization,'' which can create confusion. Response: The NSCC has removed the definition for Oil Spill Response Organization from the Guidelines. The acronym ``OSRO'' now only refers to an Oil Spill Removal Organization as defined in this latest version of the draft PREP Guidelines. Use of Electronic Messaging for Qualified Individual (QI) Notification Exercises (Section 2): One commenter requested that electronic messaging be allowed as a primary means for notifying QIs of a spill. Response: The NSCC has reviewed the language within the draft PREP Guidelines and has determined that the language will remain the same. The NSCC determined that voice should remain the primary means of communication because it quickly confirms that the notification has been received, and allows for immediate questions that may save time in emergencies; however, electronic messaging is an acceptable alternative if voice is unavailable. Confirmation of notification must be received with any communication method. Equipment Deployment Exercises and Lessons Learned Regarding Equipment Performance: One commenter noted a concern regarding the conditions under [[Page 10707]] which equipment deployment exercises are conducted, as well as the lack of mechanisms in place to capture field deployment information. This commenter recommended that the USCG and BSEE develop a standard system to evaluate the performance of spill response equipment under a range of environmental conditions and capture that information in a lessons learned database. Response: The primary purpose of the PREP Guidelines is to provide guidance to industry on oil spill response exercises as required by OPA 90. The collection of information concerning the performance of spill response equipment in a database is outside the scope of these Guidelines. Dispersant-Related Objectives during PREP Exercises: One commenter submitted an extensive set of recommendations regarding the need to incorporate more specific dispersant-related objectives in unannounced, deployment, IMT, and Area-level exercises. Response: Both BSEE and USCG regulations have requirements concerning dispersant capabilities for many of their plan holders. Most coastal Regional and Area Contingency Plans (ACPs) now have preauthorization agreements in place for the use of dispersants and in- situ burning. In order to ensure both government and industry preparedness to use all available response countermeasures, the NSCC incorporated additional recommended guidance regarding dispersants and in-situ burning into the various exercise objectives. In particular, the NSCC included in the draft Guidelines an exercise objective for industry IMT exercises to prepare and submit usage plans for Federal On-Scene Coordinator (FOSC) review and approval for each chemical, biological, or in-situ burning countermeasure that is cited as a response strategy within an Oil Spill Response Plan (OSRP) during the course of their exercise cycle. The NSCC has similarly incorporated a specific objective for Area-level IMT exercises to prepare usage plans and recommendations for FOSC review and approval for any chemical or biological countermeasures or in-situ burning that are identified as response strategies in the ACP. Finally, the NSCC has provided additional guidance necessary for properly conducting internal equipment deployment exercises of dispersant and in-situ burning equipment and procedures. Tidal Seal Boom Deployment: One commenter pointed out that under the previous Guidelines, only fifty feet of tidal seal boom need be deployed and that the revised version no longer included this information. Response: The statement ``Only 50 feet of this type of boom need be deployed'' has been included in this latest version of the draft Guidelines. Government-Initiated Unannounced Exercises (GIUEs): One commenter drew attention to the fact that guidelines for GIUEs are agency- specific and that the NSCC gave a timeframe for when it will conduct unannounced exercises in the area. Response: The timeframe has been removed to harmonize the Guidelines. Area-Level Exercise Goals: One commenter noted that Area-level exercise goals appear aggressive and that some Area-level exercises approach a Spill of National Significance (SONS) in scope and complexity, and recommended that the Guidelines limit exercises to a single day. Response: NSCC members have determined that the language in the PREP Guidelines will remain the same. The NSCC does not want to limit the flexibility of Area Committees in designing exercises that meet their needs. Testing Geographic Response Plans (GRPs) during PREP Exercises: One commenter noted that GRPs and Geographic Response Strategies (GRSs), which have been incorporated into many ACPs, should be incorporated into PREP, tested during deployment exercises, and the resultant data collected to be used to improve the GRPs/GRSs. Response: The NSCC agrees that the targeted testing of certain GRPs and GRSs is a desirable preparedness activity that could improve the quality of the strategies contained within an ACP. The PREP Guidelines cover the testing of response strategies at Section 2, Guiding Principles, Subpart J, Area Exercises. The NSCC encourages Area Committees and FOSCs to consider exercising and evaluating GRPs as part of the Area Exercise Cycle, subject to their discretion and available funding. Removal of PREP Documentation and Certification Forms from Appendix: One commenter raised concern about the removal of the forms from the PREP Guidelines for documentation for self-certification. Response: The forms were removed from the PREP Guidelines to avoid the appearance that any particular form of documentation was required. While the forms are no longer in the Guidelines, industry may choose to use those or any other form or template, at their own discretion, for their internal documentation. Multi-Agency Regulated Facility and Vessel Comments Complex Facilities Regulated by More Than One Federal Agency: One commenter raised concern that complex facilities are addressed by WCD amounts and not in average most probable discharge (AMPD) or maximum most probable discharge (MMPD). Response: The NSCC has updated the definitions for AMPD and MMPD with language about complex facilities similar to WCD for complex facilities regulated by more than one federal agency. Agency Jurisdiction for PREP with Respect to Mobile Offshore Drilling Units (MODU) and Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading (FPSO) Vessels: One commenter asked for clarification of agency jurisdiction for PREP with respect to MODUs and FPSO vessels. Response: MODUs and FPSO vessels may be properly characterized as both offshore facilities and vessels. Multi-function offshore units such as FPSOs and MODUs are regulated by both USCG and BSEE with respect to these different functions, and each agency will have its own separate jurisdiction and regulatory oversight of these functional areas. In addition, the USCG and BSEE have entered into a general Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), along with specific Memorandums of Agreement (MOAs), with respect to jurisdictional oversight. As such, it is up to each agency to provide guidance regarding the applicability of its regulations and PREP Guidelines. When MODUs and FPSO vessels are conducting operations as an offshore facility, the offshore facility PREP Guidelines overseen by BSEE apply. When MODUs and FPSO are operating as vessels, vessel PREP Guidelines overseen by USCG apply. BSEE and the USCG will work closely together to ensure a coordinated approach to PREP guidance and oversight with respect to these dual purpose entities whenever possible. USCG-Regulated Vessels and Marine Transportation-Related Facilities Comments Economic Analysis for SMFF Requirements: Multiple commenters requested that an economic analysis be conducted for the PREP Guidelines regarding the SMFF exercise requirements. Response: The PREP Guidelines are voluntary guidelines that only provide optional, recommended methods for complying with the existing regulatory requirements. As such, economic analyses are not required to be prepared [[Page 10708]] for the PREP Guidelines. The regulations themselves were subjected to an economic analysis prior to their promulgation.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ Economic analysis information is found in the preambles to the final rule for salvage and marine firefighting (73 FR 80618, December 31, 2008) and the final rule for nontank vessel response plans (78 FR 60099, September 30, 2013). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- To address the concern about the economic burden of new exercise requirements on vessel owners and operators, several modifications have been made to the PREP Guidelines as follows: 1. To comply with PREP Guidelines, vessels must conduct a Remote Assessment and Consultation Exercise for Vessels annually. PREP exercise requirements for Remote Assessment and Consultation Exercises have been more completely defined to improve the effectiveness of response planning for this service. 2. PREP exercises for SMFF emergency lightering and MFF services do not apply to NTVs with an oil capacity under 250 barrels. 3. Plan holders may claim credit for combined PREP exercises, incidents, and in the case of SMFF, they may claim PREP exercise credit for non-emergency equipment deployments during large-scale operations. NTV and SMFF Definitions: Multiple comments were received asking for clarification of the definitions related to new NTV and SMFF regulations. In addition, one commenter noted that the PREP Guidelines emphasize spill cleanup; however, the principle purpose of SMFF is spill prevention and the commenter requested that spill prevention language be included in the PREP Guidelines. Response: The following definitions have been reviewed and/or updated within the PREP Guidelines: Marine Firefighting (MFF) Organization, Plan Holder, Primary Resource Provider, Resource Provider, Salvage Organization, SMFF Provider, and SMFF Response Services. The USCG has replaced the words ``spill response'' with ``response, and ``spill management'' with ``incident management'' throughout the document to reflect that certain exercises may not include a spill, but rather the prevention of a potential spill. Remote Assessment and Consultation Exercises for Vessels--Value: Multiple commenters questioned the value of the remote assessment and consultation exercise. Others suggested that the exercise be applied to Vessel Response Plans (VRPs) instead of vessels. Response: These exercises ensure that professional remote assessment and consultation services can be effectively activated within one hour of the time anyone in the response organization receives notification of the spill or potential spill. The early initiation of a situational assessment by a competent SMFF professional may prevent potential spills from turning into spills, and prevent actual spills from escalating in size. Because of the short timeframe involved and the vessel-specific response required, this exercise must be conducted by each vessel covered under the response plan. Remote Assessment and Consultation Exercises for Vessels-- Participants: Several commenters expressed concern that the PREP Guidelines' remote assessment and consultation exercise description of participants did not reflect the process outlined in the VRP which involves initial notification via the QI. In contrast, one commenter said that since SMFF contractual agreements are directly between the owner/operator and SMFF provider, the remote assessment and consultation exercise participants should be the SMFF provider and vessel owner/operator, excluding the QI. Response: In response to these comments, the PREP Guidelines' new remote assessment and consultation exercise description reflects that participants should be consistent with the VRP for notification/ activation and provision of remote assessment and consultation services. Emergency Procedures Exercises for Vessels--Participating Elements and Applicability to SMFF Providers: One commenter asked for clarification about whether or not the emergency procedures exercise includes SMFF resource providers. Response: The PREP Guidelines' description of On-Board Emergency Procedures Exercise for vessels clearly indicates that the exercise applies to manned tank vessels and NTVs carrying oil as cargo or fuel, and that the participating elements are vessel personnel. Both the PREP On-Board Emergency Procedures Exercises and PREP's Remote Assessment and Consultation Exercises are based on scenarios found in the shipboard response chapter of the VRP. These exercises may be conducted separately. PREP allows exercises to be combined, and a vessel owner/ operator may choose to combine these two exercises to multiply the benefits obtained in terms of reinforcing the procedures to achieve quicker and more effective initial response to a spill or the threat of a spill. Incident Management Exercises for Vessels--Participating Elements: One commenter suggested that the plan holder be added to participating elements of the IMT exercise for vessels because plan holders should be aware of the IMT capabilities and their own requirements during an incident from one of their vessels. Response: The USCG agrees that the regulated party should be involved in the exercise, as reflected in the VRP. No change was necessary to reflect this. Shore-Based Salvage and Shore-Based MFF Exercises for Vessels-- Separate or Combined Exercises: Multiple commenters requested that the shore-based salvage and shore-based MFF exercises not be held separately from IMT exercises. Some suggested that the salvage and MFF exercises be combined with each other since the services for each will, in most cases, be provided by the same primary resource provider. Response: To comply with the PREP Guidelines, salvage and MFF components of the VRP must be exercised annually, either separately or combined. IMT, salvage, and MFF exercises may also be combined. It is a basic PREP tenet that plan holders may claim credit for exercises when conducted in conjunction with other exercises, and a proper record is generated. Credit should be claimed for an actual response when the objectives of the exercise(s) are met, the response is evaluated, and a proper record is generated. Third party salvage and MFF teams may provide documentation of their incidents and exercises to their clients, and their clients may claim credit for the portions of the exercise that are applicable to their VRPs. Shore-Based Salvage and Shore-Based MFF Exercises for Vessels-- Participating Elements: Several commenters requested that the vessel owner/operator be included as a participating element for the shore- based salvage and shore-based MFF exercises. Response: The management team, as established in a plan holder's VRP, must participate in PREP annual shore-based exercises for salvage and for MFF. The vessel owner/operator is not necessarily part of the management team established in the VRP, but the vessel owner/operator (or representative) may participate in the exercise. SMFF Equipment Deployment Exercises for Vessels--Participating Elements: Multiple commenters requested removal of the requirement that all SMFF equipment-operating personnel participate in an annual equipment deployment exercises [[Page 10709]] because their routine work involves the deployment of this equipment. Response: SMFF providers may claim PREP exercise credit for operational equipment deployments if exercise objectives are met and a proper record is documented. This would include claiming credit for participation of all SMFF personnel that were involved in the operational deployment of the equipment. SMFF Equipment Deployment Exercises for Vessels--Exercise Documentation: One commenter recommended that all vessel plan holders identifying a contracted SMFF provider in their response plans must be able to document completion of SMFF equipment deployment requirements. Response: It is the vessel plan holder's responsibility to ensure that the contracted SMFF provider completes PREP equipment deployment exercise requirements. All vessel plan holders identifying a contracted SMFF provider in their response plans may claim PREP credit for their SMFF provider's equipment deployment exercises following receipt of exercise documentation from the provider. Equipment Deployment Exercises for Vessels--Regional Exercises: Some commenters recommended a regional approach to SMFF equipment deployment exercises involving exercises in the Atlantic, Gulf, and Pacific regions, conducted on a rotational basis once every three years. Response: When an SMFF provider proposes to conduct regional large- scale equipment deployment exercises to meet equipment deployment exercise requirements for their clients, the provider should request Alternative Planning Criteria (APC) approval from the USCG for the proposed exercises as described in 33 CFR 155.1055 and 155.5067. All vessel plan holders identifying a contracted SMFF provider in their response plans may claim PREP credit for their SMFF provider's equipment deployment exercises following receipt of exercise documentation from the provider. GIUEs--SMFF Services: Multiple commenters recommended that GIUEs not apply to SMFF services. Response: SMFF GIUE requirements have been removed from this revision of the PREP Guidelines, and will not apply to SMFF services. BSEE-Regulated Offshore Facilities Comments Notification Exercises for BSEE-Regulated Facilities: Three commenters raised concerns over the Notification Exercises for offshore facilities. One comment indicated that requiring notifications within two weeks of beginning operations was too vague. Another comment raised a concern that this two-week requirement may conflict with provisions established by plan holders in their OSRP. A third commenter suggested that the elements of information listed as objectives that must be communicated during Notification Exercises greatly exceeds what is currently contained within OSRPs or is required in the regulations. Response: Due to the criticality of the spill notification process to an effective response, BSEE strongly recommends testing the plan holder's notification processes very early in their operational lifecycle, as well as preparing to gather and convey as much pertinent information as possible, in the early phase of an incident. BSEE has amended the language to clarify that for 24-hour manned production facilities, a Notification Exercise should be conducted within two weeks of beginning production operations. BSEE did not amend the language that pertains to mobile drilling units in this section, as BSEE believes that OSRPs should align, to the maximum extent possible, with the guidance recommended in the PREP Guidelines, which provide important additional detail concerning the implementation of the regulations. BSEE acknowledges that the elements of information now requested for a Notification Exercise is more detailed than the information that is currently required by the regulations. As a result, BSEE has amended the language in this section to indicate that a plan holder should, rather than must, communicate as many of the elements of information as possible during the Notification Exercise. Deployment Exercises for Source Control, Subsea Containment, and Supporting Equipment: Two commenters raised concerns about exercises involving source control and subsea containment equipment. One commenter stated that there are high risks and time burdens associated with unannounced exercises of this equipment, and questioned their utility to demonstrate real readiness. One commenter stated that the costs associated with conducting annual or biennial deployment exercises for this equipment is too burdensome, and that such exercises should only be conducted when there has been a material change to equipment design, provider, or means of deployment, or at a minimum frequency of five years. Response: When source control, subsea containment, and supporting equipment are listed in an OSRP as a means for regaining control of a well and securing a threatened or actual discharge of oil, the PREP Guidelines allow for Regional BSEE Oil Spill Preparedness Division (OSPD) representatives to direct an OSRP holder to conduct a deployment exercise of this equipment. As the scope and cost of such deployment exercises can be quite large, BSEE does not intend to require plan holders or providers of source control, subsea containment, and supporting equipment to conduct deployment exercises at the same semi- annual or annual frequency as required for other spill response equipment. BSEE also does not intend to routinely conduct GIUEs that include the deployment of source control, subsea containment, and supporting equipment as part of the scope of a GIUE; however, BSEE has the authority and retains the prerogative to require GIUEs that have the deployment of source control, subsea containment, and/or supporting equipment as an element of that exercise, or to require deployment exercises of this equipment that are coordinated in advance but have some elements and objectives that will remain undisclosed until the commencement of the exercise. As organizations that provide source control, subsea containment, and supporting equipment cover multiple plan holders, credit for any deployment exercise successfully conducted by such a service provider will be extended to all plan holders who contract with the provider for those services. This extension of credit does not extend to IMT exercises where the management and oversight of source control activities must be exercised to ensure proper integration with other surface response activities and the overall management of the incident. These IMT exercises must include interaction between officials from a plan holder's specific organization and its IMT, including those officials who would manage source control and subsea containment capabilities, and therefore should be conducted separately and singularly for each OSRP. GIUEs for BSEE-Regulated Facilities: One commenter requested clarification regarding whether there is an annual limit to the number of GIUEs that are conducted by BSEE. Response: The previous PREP Guidelines indicated that BSEE may exceed 50 GIUEs per year nationally. It is unlikely that BSEE would conceivably conduct 50 or more GIUEs in any given year. There is no specified limit to the number of GIUEs that BSEE may conduct in a calendar year. BSEE will use a number of factors that vary [[Page 10710]] from year to year in order to determine the need to conduct GIUEs, and will use risk-based decision-making tools whenever possible. The language in the revised Guidelines has been amended to indicate that the number of GIUEs conducted by BSEE will be determined by the BSEE OSPD Chief, and does not make any reference to a specific number that may be conducted in a given year. V. Request for Comments The NSCC members request public comments on the updated draft PREP Guidelines, which are available in docket USCG-2011-1178 as described in the ADDRESSES section of this notice. Dated: February 23, 2015. P.J. Brown, Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant Commandant for Response Policy. [FR Doc. 2015-04160 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
![10704 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Notices
Federal agencies with an annual collect information. It is common place Total Burden Hours: 285,852.
extramural research and development within many of DHS’s Components for
Carlene C. Ileto,
(R&D) budget exceeding $100 million submissions to be electronic as a result
Executive Director, Enterprise Business
are required to participate in the SBIR of implementation of e-Government
Management Office.
Program. Similarly, Federal agencies initiatives.
[FR Doc. 2015–04126 Filed 2–26–15; 8:45 am]
with an extramural R&D budget Information technology (i.e.,
BILLING CODE 9110–9B–P
exceeding $1 billion are required to electronic web portal) is used in the
participate in the STTR Program. collection of information to reduce the
Federal agencies who participate in data gathering and records management
the SBIR and STTR programs must DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
burden. DHS uses a secure Web site SECURITY
collect information from the public to: which the public can propose SBIR
(1) Meet their reporting requirements research topics and submit proposals in Coast Guard
under 15 U.S.C. 638(b)(7), (g)(8), (i), response to SBIR solicitations. In
(j)(1)(E), (j)(3)(C), (l), (o)(10), and (v); addition, DHS uses a web portal to [USCG–2011–1178]
(2) Meet the requirement to maintain review RFIs and register to submit a
both a publicly accessible database of National Preparedness for Response
white paper or proposal in response to Exercise Program (PREP) Guidelines
SBIR/STTR award information and a a specific BAA. The data collection
government database of SBIR/STTR forms standardize the collection of AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
award information for SBIR and STTR information that is necessary and ACTION: Notice and request for comment.
program evaluation under 15 U.S.C. sufficient for the DHS SBIR Program
638g(10), (k), (o)(9), and (o)(15); and Office to meet its requirements under 15 SUMMARY: The U.S. Coast Guard (USCG)
(3) Meet requirements for public announces that the updated draft PREP
U.S.C. 638.
outreach under 15 U.S.C. 638(j)(2)(F), Guidelines are available for public
There has been no change in the
(o)(14), and (s). comment. The USCG is publishing this
The prior information collect request information being collected. The
reduction in the total annual burden is notice on behalf of the National
for OMB No. 1600–0005 was approved Scheduling Coordination Committee
through February 28, 2015 by OMB in based on agency estimates. First, the
estimate is based on the number of (NSCC), which is comprised of
a Notice of OMB Action. representatives from the USCG;
The information being collected is expected contract awards requiring the
submission of information has been Environmental Protection Agency
used by the Government’s contracting (EPA); Pipeline and Hazardous
officers and other acquisition personnel, declining in the last three years.
Materials Safety Administration
including technical and legal staffs to The Office of Management and Budget
(PHMSA) under the Department of
determine adequacy of technical and is particularly interested in comments
Transportation (DOT); and the Bureau of
management approach, experience, which:
Safety and Environmental Enforcement
responsibility, responsiveness, expertise 1. Evaluate whether the proposed
(BSEE) under the Department of the
of the firms submitting offers, collection of information is necessary
Interior (DOI).
identification of members of the public for the proper performance of the
DATES: Comments must reach USCG by
(i.e., small businesses) who qualify for, functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have April 28, 2015.
and are interested in participating in, ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
the DHS SBIR Program, facilitate SBIR practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the and additional materials, identified by
outreach to the public, and provide the USCG docket number USCG–2011–
DHS SBIR Program Office necessary and agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, 1178, using any one of the following
sufficient information to determine that methods:
proposals submitted by the public to the including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
DHS SBIR Program meet criteria for http://www.regulations.gov.
consideration under the program. 3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
Failure to collect this information clarity of the information to be (3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
would adversely affect the quality of collected; and Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
products and services DHS receives 4. Minimize the burden of the Department of Transportation, West
from contractors. Potentially, contracts collection of information on those who Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
would be awarded to firms without are to respond, including through the 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
sufficient experience and expertise, use of appropriate automated, Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
thereby placing the Department’s electronic, mechanical, or other accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
operations in jeopardy. Defective and technological collection techniques or Monday through Friday, except Federal
inadequate contractor deliverables other forms of information technology, holidays. The telephone number is 202–
would adversely affect DHS’s e.g., permitting electronic submissions 366–9329.
fulfillment of the mission requirements of responses. See the ‘‘Public Participation and
in all areas. Additionally, the Analysis: Request for Comments’’ portion of the
Department would be unsuccessful in AGENCY: Office of the Chief SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
identifying small businesses with Procurement Officer, DHS. below for further instructions on
research and development (R&D) Title: Solicitation of Proposal submitting comments. To avoid
Information for Award of Public
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
capabilities, which would adversely duplication, please use only one of
affect the mission requirements in this Contracts. these methods.
area. OMB Number: 1600–0005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Many sources of the requested Frequency: Annually. For USCG: Mr. Jonathan Smith, Office
information use automated word Affected Public: Private Sector. of Marine Environmental Response
processing systems, databases, and web Number of Respondents: 13,612. Policy, 202–372–2675.
portal to facilitate preparation of Estimated Time per Respondent: 7 For BSEE: Mr. John Caplis, Oil Spill
material to be submitted and to post and hours. Preparedness Division, 703–787–1364.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:56 Feb 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM 27FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_10743/page/1.svg)
![10710 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Notices
from year to year in order to determine published in order to comply with the purpose for 20 days from the date of this
the need to conduct GIUEs, and will use December 12, 1988 Court Order in Notice. Homeless assistance providers
risk-based decision-making tools National Coalition for the Homeless v. interested in a review by HUD of the
whenever possible. The language in the Veterans Administration, No. 88–2503– determination of unsuitability should
revised Guidelines has been amended to OG (D.D.C.). call the toll free information line at 1–
indicate that the number of GIUEs Properties reviewed are listed in this 800–927–7588 for detailed instructions
conducted by BSEE will be determined Notice according to the following or write a letter to Ann Marie Oliva at
by the BSEE OSPD Chief, and does not categories: Suitable/available, suitable/ the address listed at the beginning of
make any reference to a specific number unavailable, and suitable/to be excess, this Notice. Included in the request for
that may be conducted in a given year. and unsuitable. The properties listed in review should be the property address
the three suitable categories have been (including zip code), the date of
V. Request for Comments reviewed by the landholding agencies, publication in the Federal Register, the
The NSCC members request public and each agency has transmitted to landholding agency, and the property
comments on the updated draft PREP HUD: (1) Its intention to make the
number.
Guidelines, which are available in property available for use to assist the
docket USCG–2011–1178 as described homeless, (2) its intention to declare the For more information regarding
in the ADDRESSES section of this notice. property excess to the agency’s needs, or particular properties identified in this
(3) a statement of the reasons that the Notice (i.e., acreage, floor plan, existing
Dated: February 23, 2015.
property cannot be declared excess or sanitary facilities, exact street address),
P.J. Brown,
made available for use as facilities to providers should contact the
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant appropriate landholding agencies at the
assist the homeless.
Commandant for Response Policy.
Properties listed as suitable/available following addresses: Agriculture: Ms.
[FR Doc. 2015–04160 Filed 2–26–15; 8:45 am]
will be available exclusively for Debra Kerr, Department of Agriculture,
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P homeless use for a period of 60 days Reporters Building, 300 7th Street SW.,
from the date of this Notice. Where Room 300, Washington, DC 20024,
property is described as for ‘‘off-site use (202)–720–8873; Air Force: Mr. Robert
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND only’’ recipients of the property will be E. Moriarty, P.E., AFCEC/CI, 2261
URBAN DEVELOPMENT required to relocate the building to their Hughes Avenue, Ste. 155, JBSA
[Docket No. FR–5828–N–09] own site at their own expense. Lackland, TX 78236–9853; NASA: Mr.
Homeless assistance providers Frank T. Bellinger, Facilities
Federal Property Suitable as Facilities interested in any such property should Engineering Division, National
To Assist the Homeless send a written expression of interest to Aeronautics & Space Administration,
HHS, addressed to: Ms. Theresa M. Code JX, Washington, DC 20546, (202)–
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Ritta, Chief Real Property Branch, the
Secretary for Community Planning and 358–1124; (These are not toll-free
Department of Health and Human numbers).
Development, HUD. Services, Room 5B–17, Parklawn
ACTION: Notice. Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Dated: February 19, 2015.
MD 20857, (301)-443–2265 (This is not Brian P. Fitzmaurice,
SUMMARY: This Notice identifies
a toll-free number.) HHS will mail to the Director, Division of Community Assistance,
unutilized, underutilized, excess, and
interested provider an application Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.
surplus Federal property reviewed by
packet, which will include instructions
HUD for suitability for use to assist the TITLE V, FEDERAL SURPLUS PROPERTY
for completing the application. In order
homeless. PROGRAM FEDERAL REGISTER REPORT
to maximize the opportunity to utilize a FOR 02/27/2015
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: suitable property, providers should
Juanita Perry, Department of Housing submit their written expressions of Suitable/Available Properties
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh interest as soon as possible. For
Street SW., Room 7266, Washington, DC Building
complete details concerning the
20410; telephone (202) 402–3970; TTY processing of applications, the reader is Wyoming
number for the hearing- and speech- encouraged to refer to the interim rule Jackson V.I.C.
impaired (202) 708–2565 (these governing this program, 24 CFR part 644 N. Cache St.
telephone numbers are not toll-free), or 581. Jackson WY 83001
call the toll-free Title V information line For properties listed as suitable/to be Landholding Agency: Agriculture
at 800–927–7588. excess, that property may, if Property Number: 15201510011
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In subsequently accepted as excess by Status: Excess
accordance with 24 CFR part 581 and GSA, be made available for use by the Directions: TN825007, RPUID–B1252.002791
section 501 of the Stewart B. McKinney homeless in accordance with applicable Comments: off-site removal only; 48+ yrs.
Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. law, subject to screening for other old; 1,472 sq. ft.; office; contamination ;
11411), as amended, HUD is publishing Federal use. At the appropriate time, wood stretchered; contact Agriculture for
this Notice to identify Federal buildings HUD will publish the property in a more inf.
and other real property that HUD has Notice showing it as either suitable/ Bridger-Teton Supervisor’s Office
reviewed for suitability for use to assist available or suitable/unavailable. 340 N Cache St.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the homeless. The properties were For properties listed as suitable/ Jackson WY 83001
reviewed using information provided to unavailable, the landholding agency has Landholding Agency: Agriculture
HUD by Federal landholding agencies decided that the property cannot be Property Number: 15201510012
regarding unutilized and underutilized declared excess or made available for Status: Excess
buildings and real property controlled use to assist the homeless, and the Comments: off-site removal only; 50+ yrs.
by such agencies or by GSA regarding property will not be available. old; 10,080 sq. ft.; office; contamination;
its inventory of excess or surplus Properties listed as unsuitable will wood stretchered; contact Agriculture for
Federal property. This Notice is also not be made available for any other more inf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Feb 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM 27FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_10743/page/7.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-18 13:14:23
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 13:14:23
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice and request for comment. | |
| Dates | Comments must reach USCG by April 28, 2015. | |
| Contact | For USCG: Mr. Jonathan Smith, Office of Marine Environmental Response Policy, 202-372-2675. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 10704 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR