80_FR_10751 80 FR 10712 - Central Valley Project Improvement Act Water Management Plans

80 FR 10712 - Central Valley Project Improvement Act Water Management Plans

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 39 (February 27, 2015)

Page Range10712-10713
FR Document2015-03950

The Bureau of Reclamation has made available to the public the Water Management Plans for 10 entities. For the purpose of this announcement, Water Management Plans (Plans) are considered the same as Water Conservation Plans. Reclamation is publishing this notice in order to allow the public an opportunity to review the Plans and comment on the preliminary determinations.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 39 (Friday, February 27, 2015) 
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 39 (Friday, February 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10712-10713]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03950]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation

[RR02054000, 15XR0687NA, RX.18527901.3000000]


Central Valley Project Improvement Act Water Management Plans

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation has made available to the public the 
Water Management Plans for 10 entities. For the purpose of this 
announcement, Water Management Plans (Plans) are considered the same as 
Water Conservation Plans. Reclamation is publishing this notice in 
order to allow the public an opportunity to review the Plans and 
comment on the preliminary determinations.

DATES: Submit written comments on the preliminary determinations on or 
before March 30, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Ms. Angela Anderson, Bureau of 
Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, MP-410, Sacramento, California 95825; or 
email at [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To be placed on a mailing list for any 
subsequent information, please contact Ms. Anderson at the email 
address above or 916-978-5215 (TDD 978-5608).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: To meet the requirements of the Central 
Valley Project Improvement Act of 1992 and the Reclamation Reform Act 
of 1982, the Bureau of Reclamation developed and published the Criteria 
for Evaluating Water Management Plans (Criteria). Each of the 10 
entities listed below has developed a Plan that has been evaluated and 
preliminarily determined to meet the requirements of these Criteria. 
The following Water Management Plans are available for review:

 City of Fairfield
 City of Vacaville
 City of Vallejo
 Glide Water District
 Kanawha Water District
 San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors: Consisting of Central 
California Irrigation District, Columbia Canal Company, Firebaugh Canal 
Water District, and San Luis Canal Company
 Solano County Water Agency
 Suisun-Solano Water Authority
 West Stanislaus Irrigation District
 City of West Sacramento

    We are inviting the public to comment on our preliminary (i.e., 
draft)

[[Page 10713]]

determination of Plan adequacy. Section 3405(e) of the Central Valley 
Project Improvement Act (Title 34 Pub. L. 102-575), requires the 
Secretary of the Interior to establish and administer an office on 
Central Valley Project water conservation best management practices 
that shall ``develop criteria for evaluating the adequacy of all water 
conservation plans developed by project contractors, including those 
plans required by Section 210 of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982.'' 
Also, according to Section 3405(e)(1), these criteria must be developed 
``with the purpose of promoting the highest level of water use 
efficiency reasonably achievable by project contractors using best 
available cost-effective technology and best management practices.'' 
These criteria state that all parties (Contractors) that contract with 
Reclamation for water supplies (municipal and industrial contracts over 
2,000 acre-feet and agricultural contracts over 2,000 irrigable acres) 
must prepare a Plan that contains the following information:
    1. Description of the District;
    2. Inventory of Water Resources;
    3. Best Management Practices (BMPs) for Agricultural Contractors;
    4. BMPs for Urban Contractors;
    5. Plan Implementation;
    6. Exemption Process;
    7. Regional Criteria; and
    8. Five-Year Revisions.
    Reclamation evaluates Plans based on these criteria. A copy of 
these Plans will be available for review at Reclamation's Mid-Pacific 
Regional Office, 2800 Cottage Way, MP-410, Sacramento, California 
95825. Our practice is to make comments, including names and home 
addresses of respondents, available for public review. If you wish to 
review a copy of these Plans, please contact Ms. Anderson.

Public Disclosure

    Before including your address, phone number, email address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

 Richard J. Woodley,
Regional Resources Manager, Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation.
[FR Doc. 2015-03950 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332-90-P

10712 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Notices Center, 15 Burnett Court, Durango, CO amendment. The decisions in the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 81301. Approved RMP will protect these areas FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gina from impairment of their identified Bureau of Reclamation Jones, Southwest District NEPA relevant and important values. [RR02054000, 15XR0687NA, Coordinator; telephone 970–240–5381; As a result of the Governor’s RX.18527901.3000000] address 2465 South Townsend Avenue, Consistency Review, the BLM modified Montrose, CO 81401; email gmjones@ Central Valley Project Improvement its direction to maintain minimum blm.gov. Persons who use a Act Water Management Plans instream flow levels for the benefit of telecommunications device for the deaf AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, fisheries from a standard to a guideline. (TDD) may call the Federal Information Interior. The BLM has also made minor editorial Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 modifications to the Approved RMP to ACTION: Notice of availability. to contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is provide further clarification of some of SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation available 24 hours a day, seven days a the decisions. has made available to the public the week, to leave a message or question The ROD also serves as the BLM’s Water Management Plans for 10 entities. with the above individual. You will decision to adopt the U.S. Forest Service For the purpose of this announcement, receive a reply during normal business oil and gas leasing decision for Federal Water Management Plans (Plans) are hours. mineral estate administered by the San considered the same as Water SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The RMP Juan National Forest. The U.S. Forest Conservation Plans. Reclamation is provides management for 503,589 acres Service outlined its decision in the San publishing this notice in order to allow of BLM land in southwest Colorado. The Juan National Forest’s September 2013 the public an opportunity to review the RMP describes the actions to meet Record of Decision, Oil and Gas Leasing Plans and comment on the preliminary desired resource conditions for upland Availability. The BLM concurs with the determinations. and riparian vegetation; fish and selection of Alternative B as described DATES: Submit written comments on the wildlife habitat; water resources; air in the U.S. Forest Service Record of preliminary determinations on or before quality; cultural, paleontological and Decision. In the Approved RMP, the March 30, 2015. visual resources; as well as livestock BLM also designates routes for ADDRESSES: Send written comments to grazing; mineral and alternative energy; mechanized travel in the Phil’s World Ms. Angela Anderson, Bureau of and recreation. and Mud Springs portion of the Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, MP– The BLM and the U.S. Forest Service 410, Sacramento, California 95825; or planning area that were analyzed in the initiated scoping for the RMP in 1999. email at aanderson@usbr.gov. 2008 Cortez-Mancos Travel The agencies sought public input via FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To meetings and interviews, including an Management Plan Environmental Assessment (CO–800–2006–090–EA). be placed on a mailing list for any intensive year of facilitated public subsequent information, please contact meetings in 2005, in order to develop These route designations are Ms. Anderson at the email address the Draft Land and Resource implementation decisions and are above or 916–978–5215 (TDD 978– Management Plan (LRMP)/ appealable under 43 CFR part 4. These 5608). Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). decisions are contained in Section 2.13 of the Approved RMP. Any party SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: To meet The Draft was published for a 90-day adversely affected by the proposed route the requirements of the Central Valley public comment period in December designations may appeal within 30 days Project Improvement Act of 1992 and 2007. Based on public comments, the of publication of this Notice of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982, the agencies identified the need to prepare Bureau of Reclamation developed and a Supplement to the Draft EIS to Availability pursuant to 43 CFR part 4, published the Criteria for Evaluating consider the Reasonable Foreseeable subpart E. The appeal should state the Water Management Plans (Criteria). Development potential of oil and gas in specific route(s), as identified in Each of the 10 entities listed below has the Gothic Shale Gas Play, which was Appendix A of the Approved RMP, for developed a Plan that has been published in August 2011. The which the decision is being appealed. evaluated and preliminarily determined preferred alternative for the Draft LRMP The appeal must be filed with the Tres to meet the requirements of these was carried forward into the Proposed Rios Field Manager at the above listed Criteria. The following Water LRMP/Final EIS, which was published address. Please consult the appropriate Management Plans are available for in September 2013, initiating the protest regulations (43 CFR part 4, subpart E) review: period and Governor’s Consistency for further appeal requirements. Review. During the protest period for • City of Fairfield Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR • City of Vacaville the Proposed LRMP, the BLM received • City of Vallejo 14 valid protest submissions. The BLM 1506.10. • Glide Water District granted one protest in part and Ruth Welch, • Kanawha Water District dismissed the remaining protests. The BLM Colorado State Director. • San Joaquin River Exchange BLM granted in part one protest Contractors: Consisting of Central [FR Doc. 2015–04075 Filed 2–26–15; 8:45 am] regarding 15 potential Areas of Critical California Irrigation District, Environmental Concern (ACEC) that BILLING CODE 4310–JB–P Columbia Canal Company, Firebaugh mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES BLM determined met both the relevance Canal Water District, and San Luis and importance criteria, but were not Canal Company analyzed in the range of alternatives in • Solano County Water Agency the Draft EIS due to a procedural error. • Suisun-Solano Water Authority The BLM will evaluate these areas, as • West Stanislaus Irrigation District well as the two existing ACECs that will • City of West Sacramento continue to be designated as ACECs in We are inviting the public to the Approved RMP, in a future plan comment on our preliminary (i.e., draft) VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Feb 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM 27FEN1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Notices 10713 determination of Plan adequacy. Section INTERNATIONAL TRADE ACTION: Notice. 3405(e) of the Central Valley Project COMMISSION Improvement Act (Title 34 Pub. L. 102– SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–458 and 731– the U.S. International Trade 575), requires the Secretary of the TA–1154 (Review)] Interior to establish and administer an Commission has determined not to office on Central Valley Project water Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving review: (1) An initial determination conservation best management practices and Racks From China: Determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 17) issued by the that shall ‘‘develop criteria for presiding administrative law judge evaluating the adequacy of all water On the basis of the record 1 developed (‘‘ALJ’’) on January 22, 2015, granting a conservation plans developed by project in the subject five-year reviews, the motion to terminate the investigation as contractors, including those plans United States International Trade to respondents Sinowell (Shanghai) Co. required by Section 210 of the Commission (‘‘Commission’’) Ltd. and Sinohydro Ltd. (collectively, Reclamation Reform Act of 1982.’’ Also, determines, pursuant to section 751(c) ‘‘Sinowell’’), based on a settlement according to Section 3405(e)(1), these of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. agreement; and (2) an ID (Order No. 18) criteria must be developed ‘‘with the 1675(c)), that revocation of the existing issued by the ALJ on January 27, 2015, purpose of promoting the highest level antidumping and countervailing duty granting a motion to terminate the of water use efficiency reasonably orders on certain kitchen appliance investigation as to the remaining achievable by project contractors using shelving and racks from China would be respondents based on withdrawal of the best available cost-effective technology likely to lead to continuation or amended complaint. and best management practices.’’ These recurrence of material injury to a U.S. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: criteria state that all parties industry producing refrigeration Cathy Chen, Office of the General (Contractors) that contract with shelving and a U.S. industry producing Counsel, U.S. International Trade Reclamation for water supplies oven racks within a reasonably Commission, 500 E Street SW., (municipal and industrial contracts over foreseeable time. Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 2,000 acre-feet and agricultural Background 205–2392. Copies of non-confidential contracts over 2,000 irrigable acres) documents filed in connection with this The Commission instituted these must prepare a Plan that contains the investigation are or will be available for reviews on August 1, 2014 (79 FR following information: inspection during official business 44862) and determined on November 4, 1. Description of the District; hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 2014 that it would conduct expedited 2. Inventory of Water Resources; Office of the Secretary, U.S. reviews (79 FR 69525, November 21, 3. Best Management Practices (BMPs) International Trade Commission, 500 E 2014). for Agricultural Contractors; The Commission completed and filed Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 4. BMPs for Urban Contractors; its determinations in these reviews on telephone (202) 205–2000. General 5. Plan Implementation; February 24, 2015. The views of the information concerning the Commission 6. Exemption Process; Commission are contained in USITC may also be obtained by accessing its 7. Regional Criteria; and Publication 4520 (February 2015), Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). 8. Five-Year Revisions. entitled Certain Kitchen Appliance The public record for this investigation Reclamation evaluates Plans based on Shelving and Racks from China: may be viewed on the Commission’s these criteria. A copy of these Plans will Investigation Nos. 701–TA–458 and electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// be available for review at Reclamation’s 731–TA–1154 (Review). edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired Mid-Pacific Regional Office, 2800 persons are advised that information on Issued: February 24, 2015. this matter can be obtained by Cottage Way, MP–410, Sacramento, By order of the Commission. California 95825. Our practice is to contacting the Commission’s TDD Lisa R. Barton, terminal on (202) 205–1810. make comments, including names and Secretary to the Commission. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The home addresses of respondents, available for public review. If you wish [FR Doc. 2015–04114 Filed 2–26–15; 8:45 am] Commission instituted this investigation to review a copy of these Plans, please BILLING CODE 7020–02–P on August 12, 2014, based on a contact Ms. Anderson. complaint filed on June 20, 2014, amended on July 11, 2014, and Public Disclosure INTERNATIONAL TRADE supplemented on July 18, 2014, on Before including your address, phone COMMISSION behalf of Sunlight Supply, Inc. of number, email address, or other [Investigation No. 337–TA–924] Vancouver, Washington and IP personal identifying information in your Holdings, LLC of Vancouver, comment, you should be aware that Certain Light Reflectors and Washington (collectively, ‘‘Sunlight’’). your entire comment—including your Components, Packaging, and Related 79 FR 47156 (Aug. 12, 2014). The personal identifying information—may Advertising Thereof; Notice of amended complaint alleged violations be made publicly available at any time. Commission Determination Not To of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, While you can ask us in your comment Review Initial Determinations Granting as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the sale to withhold your personal identifying Motions To Terminate the Investigation for importation, importation, and sale information from public review, we as to the Remaining Respondents; within the United States after mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES cannot guarantee that we will be able to Termination of the Investigation in Its importation of certain light reflectors do so. Entirety and components, packaging, and related advertising thereof by reason of Richard J. Woodley, AGENCY:U.S. International Trade infringement of certain claims of U.S. Regional Resources Manager, Mid-Pacific Commission. Patent Nos. 7,641,367; D634,469; Region, Bureau of Reclamation. D644,185; D545,485; and by reason of 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the [FR Doc. 2015–03950 Filed 2–26–15; 8:45 am] infringement of U.S. Trademark Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 BILLING CODE 4332–90–P CFR 207.2(f)). Registration Nos. 3,871,765; and VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Feb 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM 27FEN1


Document Created: 2015-12-18 13:14:29
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 13:14:29
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice of availability.
DatesSubmit written comments on the preliminary determinations on or before March 30, 2015.
ContactTo be placed on a mailing list for any subsequent information, please contact Ms. Anderson at the email
FR Citation80 FR 10712 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR