80 FR 11101 - Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 40 (March 2, 2015)
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 40 (March 2, 2015)
| Page Range | 11101-11106 | |
| FR Document | 2015-02676 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 40 (Monday, March 2, 2015)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 11101-11106] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-02676] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2014-0189; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-181-AD; Amendment 39-18099; AD 2015-03-03] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Airbus Model A300 series airplanes, Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4- 600R series airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes (collectively called Model A300-600 series airplanes). This AD was prompted by a report of chafing found on the overflow sensor harness of the surge tank, and subsequent contact between the electrical wiring and fuel tank structure. This AD requires a one-time inspection for chafing of the overflow sensor harness, and repair if necessary. This AD also requires modification of the sensor harness. We are issuing this AD to prevent chafing of the harness and subsequent contact between the electrical wiring and fuel tank structure, which could result in electrical arcing and a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane. DATES: This AD becomes effective April 6, 2015. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of April 6, 2015. ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0189 or in person at the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC. For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email [email protected]; Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. [[Page 11102]] For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014- 0189. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-227-2125; fax: 425-227-1149. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all Airbus Model A300 series airplanes, Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-600R series airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes (collectively called Model A300-600 series airplanes). The NPRM published in the Federal Register on April 8, 2014 (79 FR 19296). The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness Directive 2013-0193, dated August 23, 2013 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for all Airbus Model A300 series airplanes, Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-600R series airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes (collectively called Model A300-600 series airplanes). The MCAI states: During a scheduled maintenance check on an A300 aeroplane, chafing was found on the surge tank overflow sensor harness. The harness was found to contact the Magnetic Fuel Level Indicator (MFLI) canister. Prompted by these findings, DGAC [Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile] France issued [(http://ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/easa_ad_1999_404_293.pdf/AD_1999-404-293)] to require modification of the harness routing in accordance with the instructions of Airbus SB [service bulletin] A300-28-0058 or SB A300-28-6020, as applicable to aeroplane model. Since that [DGAC] AD was issued, maintenance work on modified A300-600 aeroplanes revealed some chafing of the harness, creating a potential contact between the electrical wire and fuel tank structure. Investigations have shown that although measures were taken to prevent contact of the harness with the MFLI (through modification 04489), the installation can be subject to human error. As the MFLI is integral to the access panel in this location, any potential contact with the harness (as a result of incorrect installation) is hidden. This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to electrical arcing, possibly resulting in a fuel tank explosion and loss of the aeroplane. To address this potential unsafe condition, Airbus issued SB A300-28-0091 for A300 aeroplanes, SB A300-28-6109 for A300-600 aeroplanes, and A300-28-9022 for A300-600ST aeroplanes. For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires a one- time inspection of the harness and, depending on findings, corrective actions, as well as replacement of angle brackets by error-proof harness brackets. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0189-0002. Comments We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM (79 FR 19296, April 8, 2014) and the FAA's response to each comment. Request To Remove AD Reference in Repair Approvals United Parcel Service (UPS) asked that we remove the requirement to include the AD reference in repair approvals, as specified in paragraph (g)(1) of the proposed AD (79 FR 19296, April 8, 2014), which states ``For a repair to be approved, the repair must specifically refer to this AD.'' UPS stated the following: ``The proposed wording, being specific to repairs, eliminates the interpretation that Airbus messages are acceptable for approving minor deviations (corrective actions) needed during accomplishment of a mandated Airbus service bulletin.'' UPS added that this will result in an increase in alternative method of compliance (AMOC) requests. We agree with the commenter's request to remove the requirement that repair approvals specifically refer to this AD, from this AD. Since late 2006, we have included a standard paragraph titled ``Airworthy Product'' in all MCAI ADs in which the FAA develops an AD based on a foreign authority's AD. The MCAI or referenced service information in an FAA AD often directs the owner/operator to contact the manufacturer for corrective actions, such as a repair. Briefly, the Airworthy Product paragraph allowed owners/operators to use corrective actions provided by the manufacturer if those actions were FAA- approved. In addition, the paragraph stated that any actions approved by the State of Design Authority (or its delegated agent) are considered to be FAA-approved. In the NPRM (79 FR 19296, April 8, 2014), we proposed to prevent the use of repairs that were not specifically developed to correct the unsafe condition, by requiring that the repair approval provided by the State of Design Authority or its delegated agent specifically refer to this FAA AD. This change was intended to clarify the method of compliance and to provide operators with better visibility of repairs that are specifically developed and approved to correct the unsafe condition. In addition, we proposed to change the phrase ``its delegated agent'' to include ``the Design Approval Holder (DAH) with a State of Design Authority's design organization approval (DOA)'' to refer to a DAH authorized to approve required repairs for the AD. As stated previously, UPS commented that: ``The proposed wording, being specific to repairs, eliminates the interpretation that Airbus messages are acceptable for approving minor deviations (corrective actions) needed during accomplishment of an AD mandated Airbus service bulletin.'' This comment has made the FAA aware that some operators have misunderstood or misinterpreted the Airworthy Product paragraph to allow the owner/operator to use messages provided by the manufacturer as approval of deviations during the accomplishment of an AD-mandated action. The Airworthy Product paragraph does not approve messages or other information provided by the manufacturer for deviations to the requirements of the AD-mandated actions. The Airworthy Product paragraph only addresses the requirement to contact the manufacturer for corrective actions for the identified unsafe condition and does not cover deviations from other AD requirements. However, deviations to AD- required actions are addressed in 14 CFR 39.17, and anyone may request the approval for an alternative method of compliance to the AD-required actions using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. To address this misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the Airworthy Product paragraph, we have changed that paragraph and retitled it ``Contacting the Manufacturer.'' This paragraph now clarifies that for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the actions must be accomplished using a method approved by the FAA, EASA, or Airbus's EASA DOA. The Contacting the Manufacturer paragraph also clarifies that, if approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature. The DOA signature indicates that the data and information contained in the document are EASA-approved, which is also FAA- approved. Messages and other information provided by the [[Page 11103]] manufacturer, that do not contain the DOA-authorized signature approval are not EASA-approved, unless EASA directly approves the manufacturer's message or other information. This clarification does not remove flexibility previously afforded by the Airworthy Product paragraph. Consistent with long-standing FAA policy, such flexibility was never intended for required actions. This is also consistent with the recommendation of the Airworthiness Directive Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee to increase flexibility in complying with ADs by identifying those actions in manufacturers' service instructions that are ``Required for Compliance'' with ADs. We continue to work with manufacturers to implement this recommendation. But once we determine that an action is required, any deviation from the requirement must be approved as an AMOC. Commenters to an NPRM having Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-101-AD (78 FR 78285, December 26, 2013) pointed out that in many cases the foreign manufacturer's service bulletin and the foreign authority's MCAI may have been issued some time before the FAA AD. Therefore, the DOA may have provided U.S. operators with an approved repair, developed with full awareness of the unsafe condition, before the FAA AD is issued. Under these circumstances, to comply with the FAA AD, the operator would be required to go back to the manufacturer's DOA and obtain a new approval document, adding time and expense to the compliance process with no safety benefit. Based on these comments, we removed the requirement from this AD that the DAH-provided repair specifically refer to this AD. Before adopting such a requirement in the future, the FAA will coordinate with affected DAHs and verify they are prepared to implement means to ensure that their repair approvals consider the unsafe condition addressed in an AD. Any such requirements will be adopted through the normal AD rulemaking process, including notice-and-comment procedures, when appropriate. We also have decided not to include a generic reference to either the ``delegated agent'' or the ``DAH with State of Design Authority design organization approval,'' but instead we have provided the specific delegation approval granted by the State of Design Authority for the DAH. Request To Extend the Compliance Time UPS asked that we extend the compliance time specified in paragraph (g) of the proposed AD (79 FR 19296, April 8, 2014) from 30 to 36 months. UPS stated that it expects to accomplish the inspection during its existing C-check interval, which is 30 months. UPS added that in order to perform the inspection and repair at its major maintenance facility during C-checks, it requires an additional 6 months to allow for planning, preparation, and prototyping of the service information. UPS noted that this additional time is for the prototyping effort necessary when a project is initiated; UPS has determined that service information is often revised during accomplishment of the required actions, which makes it difficult to maintain regular maintenance schedules. Therefore, UPS must schedule special visit check lines for accomplishing the actions. We do not agree with the commenter's request to extend the compliance time. In developing an appropriate compliance time for this action, we considered the safety implications, parts availability, and normal maintenance schedules for the timely accomplishment of the inspection and subsequent modification. In consideration of these items, as well as the possibility of chafing of the overflow sensor harness, we have determined that a 30-month compliance time will ensure an acceptable level of safety and allow the modification to be done during scheduled maintenance intervals for most affected operators. However, under the provisions of paragraph (j)(1) of this AD, we will consider requests for approval of an extension of the compliance time if sufficient data are submitted to substantiate that the new compliance time would provide an acceptable level of safety. We have not changed this AD in this regard. Request To Include Another Source of Service Information FedEx Express asked that we allow the use of UTC Aerospace Systems Service Bulletin V-1577 for accomplishing the actions in the NPRM (79 FR 19296, April 8, 2014). FedEx Express stated that it operates 71 Airbus Model A300-600 series airplanes, and 65 of those airplanes have had the in-tank fuel quantity system modified by a certain supplemental type certificate (STC), which means Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28- 6109, Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013 (referred to as the appropriate source of service information for accomplishing the actions), cannot be used to accomplish the proposed actions. However, FedEx Express noted that six of its airplanes have the production in- tank fuel quantity system installed, and the referenced service information can be used for those airplanes. FedEx Express stated that the UTC Aerospace Systems service bulletin has not been issued yet; however, after issuance it should be included in the NPRM as a source of service information for accomplishing the proposed actions in order to mitigate the unsafe condition. We partially agree with the commenter. We agree that airplanes that have had the in-tank fuel quantity system modified by STC ST00092BO (http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/D41C5AE8E46B4901862574900069E004?OpenDocument&Highlight=st00092bo) cannot accomplish the actions proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 19296, April 8, 2014) by using Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6109, Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013. Since the issuance of the NPRM, UTC Aerospace Systems has issued service bulletin 300723-28-03 (V-1577), dated October 10, 2014, to address the unsafe condition for airplanes that have been modified by supplemental type certificate ST00092BO. We do not agree to revise this AD to require UTC Aerospace Systems Service Bulletin 300723-28-03 (V-1577), dated October 10, 2014. Instead, we are considering separate rulemaking to require the procedures and compliance time specified in UTC Aerospace Systems Service Bulletin 300723-28-03 (V-1577), dated October 10, 2014, for airplanes modified by STC ST00092BO. Therefore, we have revised paragraph (c) of this AD by removing airplanes modified by STC ST00092BO from the applicability of this AD. Request To Include Revised Service Information FedEx Express asked that Revision 02 of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6109 be included for accomplishing the actions in the NPRM (79 FR 19296, April 8, 2014) before the final rule is issued. FedEx Express stated that it reviewed Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6109, Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013, and submitted its findings to Airbus for incorporation into upcoming Revision 02 before issuance. FedEx Express added that its intent in doing so was to prevent future requests for AMOCs to the FAA. We disagree with the commenter's request to include Revision 02 of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6109. We are aware that Airbus is considering [[Page 11104]] revising Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6109, Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013, to incorporate feedback received from FedEx Express in the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin. We will consider approving Revision 02 of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6109 as an AMOC to the actions specified in paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, once this service bulletin is released. However, we find that delaying this AD action would be inappropriate in light of the urgency of the identified unsafe condition. Therefore, no change has been made to this AD in this regard. Request To Clarify the ``Required for Compliance'' Instructions FedEx Express asked for clarification as to whether the Required for Compliance (RC) note identified in the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6109, Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013, is applicable to the actions specified in the NPRM (79 FR 19296, April 8, 2014) and EASA Airworthiness Directive 2013-0193, dated August 23, 2013. We acknowledge the commenter's concern and provide the following clarification: The FAA worked in conjunction with industry, under the Airworthiness Directives Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC), to enhance the AD system. One enhancement is a new process for annotating which steps in the service information are ``required for compliance'' with an AD. Differentiating these steps from other tasks in the service information is expected to improve an owner's and operator's understanding of AD requirements and help provide consistent judgment in AD compliance. In response to the AD Implementation ARC, the FAA released AC 20-176, Revision A, dated June 16, 2014, (http:// rgl.avs.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/ 0/a78cc91a47b192278625796b0075f419/$FILE/AC%2020-176.pdf); and Order 8110.117 (http://rgl.avs.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/ rgOrders.nsf/0/984bb9eb07cdd86986257a7f0070744c/$FILE/ Order%208110.117.pdf), which include the concept of RC. The FAA has begun implementing this concept in ADs when we receive service information containing RC steps. Therefore, the RC note does apply to the actions required by this AD when using Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6109, Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013, to accomplish the required actions. We do not have information concerning how EASA implements the RC concept in its ADs. We split paragraph (j)(1) and redesignated the content as paragraphs (j)(1) and (j)(1)(i) of this AD, and added paragraph (j)(1)(ii) to this AD to reflect information concerning the RC concept and to explain when it is necessary to request approval of an AMOC. Clarification of Inspection Type Paragraph (g) of this AD has been revised to clarify the inspection type as a one-time general visual inspection. Conclusion We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial changes. We have determined that these changes:Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 19296, April 8, 2014) for correcting the unsafe condition; and Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 19296, April 8, 2014). We also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD. Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 We reviewed Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletins A300-28-0091, dated March 5, 2013; and A300-28-6109, Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013. This service information describes procedures for a one-time inspection for chafing of the overflow sensor harness, and contacting the manufacturer for repair instructions. This service information also describes modification of the sensor harness. This service information is reasonably available; see ADDRESSES for ways to access this service information. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this AD affects 123 airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it takes about 3 work-hours per product to comply with the inspection required by this AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this inspection on U.S. operators to be $31,365, or $255 per product. We estimate that it takes about 12 work-hours per product to comply with the modification requirements of this AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts cost about $500 per product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this modification on U.S. operators to be $186,960, or $1,520 per product. We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide cost estimates for the on-condition repairs specified in this AD. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: 1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and 4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0189; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The [[Page 11105]] street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone 800-647- 5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 0 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Sec. 39.13 [Amended] 0 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): 2015-03-03 Airbus: Amendment 39-18099. Docket No. FAA-2014-0189; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-181-AD. (a) Effective Date This AD becomes effective April 6, 2015. (b) Affected ADs None. (c) Applicability This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes specified in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), (c)(3), (c)(4), and (c)(5) of this AD, certificated in any category, all manufacturer serial numbers; except for airplanes modified by supplemental type certificate ST00092BO (http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/D41C5AE8E46B4901862574900069E004?OpenDocument&Highlight=st00092bo). (1) Model A300 B2-1A, B2-1C, B2K-3C, B2-203, B4-2C, B4-103, and B4-203 airplanes. (2) Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, and B4-622 airplanes. (3) Model A300 B4-605R and B4-622R airplanes. (4) Model A300 F4-605R and F4-622R airplanes. (5) Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes. (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28, Fuel. (e) Reason This AD was prompted by a report of chafing found on the overflow sensor harness of the surge tank, and subsequent contact between the electrical wiring and fuel tank structure. We are issuing this AD to prevent chafing of the harness and subsequent contact between the electrical wiring and fuel tank structure, which could result in electrical arcing and a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. (g) One-Time Inspection and Repair Within 30 months after the effective date of this AD: Perform a one-time general visual inspection for chafing of the outer tank sensor harness between ribs 26 and 27, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-0091, dated March 5, 2013 (for Model A300 series airplanes); or Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6109, Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013 (for Model A300-600 series airplanes); (1) If any previous repairs are identified, or if braid and wire insulation is found damaged with the conductor exposed during the inspection required by the introductory text of paragraph (g) of this AD: Before further flight, repair using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). (2) If the braid and wire insulation is found damaged without the conductor exposed during the inspection required by the introductory text of paragraph (g) of this AD: Before further flight, repair, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-0091, dated March 5, 2013 (for Model A300 series airplanes); or Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28- 6109, Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013 (for Model A300-600 series airplanes). (h) Modification (1) For airplanes on which no damage was found during the inspection required by the introductory text of paragraph (g) of this AD: Before further flight, install modified and error-proof angle brackets to stringer 15 between ribs 26 and 27 of the outer tank sensor harness, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-0091, dated March 5, 2013 (for Model A300 series airplanes); or Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6109, Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013 (for Model A300- 600 series airplanes). (2) For airplanes on which any damage was found during the inspection required by the introductory text of paragraph (g) of this AD, and the applicable repair required by paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD has been done: Before further flight, install modified and error-proof angle brackets to stringer 15 between ribs 26 and 27 of the outer tank sensor harness, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-0091, dated March 5, 2013 (for Model A300 series airplanes); or Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6109, Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013 (for Model A300-600 series airplanes). (i) Credit for Previous Actions This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD using Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6109, dated March 5, 2013, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD. (j) Other FAA AD Provisions The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057- 3356; phone: 425-227-2125; fax: 425-227-1149. Information may be emailed to: [email protected]. (i) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD. (ii) Except as required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD: If the service information contains procedures or tests that are identified as RC (Required for Compliance), those procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any procedures and tests that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in a serviceable condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC require approval of an AMOC. (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA. If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature. (k) Related Information (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2013-0193, dated August 23, 2013, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0189-0002. (2) Service information identified in this AD that is not incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in paragraphs (l)(3) and (l)(4) of this AD. (l) Material Incorporated by Reference (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this [[Page 11106]] paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-0091, dated March 5, 2013. (ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6109, Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013. (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email [email protected]; Internet http://www.airbus.com. (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html. Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 2, 2015. Jeffrey E. Duven, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2015-02676 Filed 2-27-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 11101
(l) Credit for Previous Actions be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(1) This paragraph provides credit for Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
actions required by paragraph (i)(1) of this Information Collection Clearance Officer, Federal Aviation Administration
AD, if those actions were performed before AES–200.
the effective date of this AD using Airbus 14 CFR Part 39
Service Bulletin A320–53–1195, Revision 03, (n) Related Information
dated November 8, 2011; or Airbus Service (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing [Docket No. FAA–2014–0189; Directorate
Bulletin A320–53–1195, Revision 04, dated Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA Identifier 2013–NM–181–AD; Amendment
August 22, 2012; which are not incorporated 39–18099; AD 2015–03–03]
Airworthiness Directive 2012–0118, dated
by reference in this AD. July 4, 2012, for related information. You RIN 2120–AA64
(2) This paragraph provides credit for
may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on
actions required by paragraph (i)(2) of this Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
AD, if those actions were performed before the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/
the effective date of this AD using Airbus #!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0139-0002. Airplanes
Service Bulletin A320–53–1196, Revision 02, (2) Service information identified in this
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
dated November 8, 2011; or Airbus Service AD that is not incorporated by reference in
this AD is available at the addresses specified
Administration (FAA), Department of
Bulletin A320–53–1196, Revision 03, dated
August 22, 2012; which are not incorporated in paragraphs (o)(5) and (o)(6) of this AD.
Transportation (DOT).
by reference in this AD. ACTION: Final rule.
(o) Material Incorporated by Reference
(m) Other FAA AD Provisions SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
The following provisions also apply to this approved the incorporation by reference airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
AD: Airbus Model A300 series airplanes,
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance Model A300 B4–600, B4–600R, and F4–
(AMOCs): The Manager, International paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51. 600R series airplanes, and Model A300
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to (2) You must use this service information C4–605R Variant F airplanes
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested as applicable to do the actions required by (collectively called Model A300–600
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. series airplanes). This AD was prompted
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your (3) The following service information was by a report of chafing found on the
request to your principal inspector or local approved for IBR on April 6, 2015. overflow sensor harness of the surge
Flight Standards District Office, as (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–53–1195, tank, and subsequent contact between
appropriate. If sending information directly Revision 05, dated November 22, 2013. the electrical wiring and fuel tank
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: structure. This AD requires a one-time
(ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–53–1196,
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Revision 04, dated November 22, 2013. inspection for chafing of the overflow
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind (4) The following service information was sensor harness, and repair if necessary.
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; approved for IBR on November 3, 2009 (74 This AD also requires modification of
telephone 425–227–1405; fax 425–227–1149. FR 49795, September 29, 2009). the sensor harness. We are issuing this
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116- (i) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin AD to prevent chafing of the harness
AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using A320–53–1195, Revision 02, including and subsequent contact between the
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate Appendix 01, dated April 5, 2007. electrical wiring and fuel tank structure,
principal inspector, or lacking a principal (ii) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin which could result in electrical arcing
inspector, the manager of the local flight A320–53–1196, Revision 01, including
standards district office/certificate holding
and a fuel tank explosion and
Appendix 01, dated November 29, 2006. consequent loss of the airplane.
district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD. (5) For service information identified in DATES: This AD becomes effective April
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness 6, 2015.
effective date of this AD, for any requirement Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice The Director of the Federal Register
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; approved the incorporation by reference
a manufacturer, the action must be telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
of certain publications listed in this AD
accomplished using a method approved by 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@
as of April 6, 2015.
the Manager, International Branch, ANM– airbus.com; Internet http://www.airbus.com.
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or (6) You may view this service information ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
EASA; or Airbus’s EASA DOA. If approved at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, docket on the Internet at http://
by the DOA, the approval must include the 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For www.regulations.gov/
DOA-authorized signature. #!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0189 or in
information on the availability of this
(3) Reporting Requirements: A federal person at the Docket Management
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a Facility, U.S. Department of
person is not required to respond to, nor (7) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
shall a person be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of National Archives and Records 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
information subject to the requirements of Administration (NARA). For information on W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that the availability of this material at NARA, call Washington, DC.
collection of information displays a current 202–741–6030, or go to: http:// For service information identified in
valid OMB Control Number. The OMB www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr- this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness
Control Number for this information locations.html. Office—EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice
collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
this collection of information is estimated to Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
be approximately 5 minutes per response, 4, 2015.
61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-
including the time for reviewing instructions, Dionne Palermo,
completing and reviewing the collection of eas@airbus.com; Internet http://
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane www.airbus.com. You may view this
information. All responses to this collection
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. referenced service information at the
of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and [FR Doc. 2015–02692 Filed 2–27–15; 8:45 am] FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
suggestions for reducing the burden should BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:17 Feb 27, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM 02MRR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_11141/page/1.svg)
![11102 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
For information on the availability of possibly resulting in a fuel tank explosion condition, by requiring that the repair
this material at the FAA, call 425–227– and loss of the aeroplane. To address this approval provided by the State of
1221. It is also available on the Internet potential unsafe condition, Airbus issued SB Design Authority or its delegated agent
A300–28–0091 for A300 aeroplanes, SB
at http://www.regulations.gov by A300–28–6109 for A300–600 aeroplanes, and
specifically refer to this FAA AD. This
searching for and locating Docket No. A300–28–9022 for A300–600ST aeroplanes. change was intended to clarify the
FAA–2014–0189. For the reasons described above, this method of compliance and to provide
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan [EASA] AD requires a one-time inspection of operators with better visibility of repairs
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, the harness and, depending on findings, that are specifically developed and
International Branch, ANM–116, corrective actions, as well as replacement of approved to correct the unsafe
angle brackets by error-proof harness condition. In addition, we proposed to
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, brackets.
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA change the phrase ‘‘its delegated agent’’
98057–3356; phone: 425–227–2125; fax: You may examine the MCAI in the to include ‘‘the Design Approval Holder
425–227–1149. AD docket on the Internet at http:// (DAH) with a State of Design
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: www.regulations.gov/#!document Authority’s design organization
Detail;D=FAA-2014-0189-0002. approval (DOA)’’ to refer to a DAH
Discussion authorized to approve required repairs
Comments
We issued a notice of proposed for the AD.
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR We gave the public the opportunity to As stated previously, UPS commented
part 39 by adding an AD that would participate in developing this AD. The that: ‘‘The proposed wording, being
apply to all Airbus Model A300 series following presents the comments specific to repairs, eliminates the
airplanes, Model A300 B4–600, B4– received on the NPRM (79 FR 19296, interpretation that Airbus messages are
600R, and F4–600R series airplanes, and April 8, 2014) and the FAA’s response acceptable for approving minor
Model A300 C4–605R Variant F to each comment. deviations (corrective actions) needed
airplanes (collectively called Model Request To Remove AD Reference in during accomplishment of an AD
A300–600 series airplanes). The NPRM Repair Approvals mandated Airbus service bulletin.’’ This
published in the Federal Register on comment has made the FAA aware that
United Parcel Service (UPS) asked some operators have misunderstood or
April 8, 2014 (79 FR 19296). that we remove the requirement to
The European Aviation Safety Agency misinterpreted the Airworthy Product
include the AD reference in repair paragraph to allow the owner/operator
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
approvals, as specified in paragraph to use messages provided by the
for the Member States of the European
(g)(1) of the proposed AD (79 FR 19296, manufacturer as approval of deviations
Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness
April 8, 2014), which states ‘‘For a during the accomplishment of an AD-
Directive 2013–0193, dated August 23,
repair to be approved, the repair must mandated action. The Airworthy
2013 (referred to after this as the
specifically refer to this AD.’’ UPS Product paragraph does not approve
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
stated the following: ‘‘The proposed messages or other information provided
Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
wording, being specific to repairs, by the manufacturer for deviations to
an unsafe condition for all Airbus
eliminates the interpretation that Airbus the requirements of the AD-mandated
Model A300 series airplanes, Model
messages are acceptable for approving actions. The Airworthy Product
A300 B4–600, B4–600R, and F4–600R
minor deviations (corrective actions) paragraph only addresses the
series airplanes, and Model A300 C4–
needed during accomplishment of a requirement to contact the manufacturer
605R Variant F airplanes (collectively
mandated Airbus service bulletin.’’ UPS for corrective actions for the identified
called Model A300–600 series
added that this will result in an increase unsafe condition and does not cover
airplanes). The MCAI states:
in alternative method of compliance deviations from other AD requirements.
During a scheduled maintenance check on (AMOC) requests. However, deviations to AD-required
an A300 aeroplane, chafing was found on the We agree with the commenter’s actions are addressed in 14 CFR 39.17,
surge tank overflow sensor harness. The request to remove the requirement that and anyone may request the approval
harness was found to contact the Magnetic
repair approvals specifically refer to this for an alternative method of compliance
Fuel Level Indicator (MFLI) canister.
Prompted by these findings, DGAC AD, from this AD. to the AD-required actions using the
[Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile] Since late 2006, we have included a procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
France issued [(http://ad.easa.europa.eu/ standard paragraph titled ‘‘Airworthy To address this misunderstanding and
blob/easa_ad_1999_404_293.pdf/AD_1999- Product’’ in all MCAI ADs in which the misinterpretation of the Airworthy
404-293)] to require modification of the FAA develops an AD based on a foreign Product paragraph, we have changed
harness routing in accordance with the authority’s AD. The MCAI or referenced that paragraph and retitled it
instructions of Airbus SB [service bulletin] service information in an FAA AD often ‘‘Contacting the Manufacturer.’’ This
A300–28–0058 or SB A300–28–6020, as directs the owner/operator to contact paragraph now clarifies that for any
applicable to aeroplane model.
Since that [DGAC] AD was issued,
the manufacturer for corrective actions, requirement in this AD to obtain
maintenance work on modified A300–600 such as a repair. Briefly, the Airworthy corrective actions from a manufacturer,
aeroplanes revealed some chafing of the Product paragraph allowed owners/ the actions must be accomplished using
harness, creating a potential contact between operators to use corrective actions a method approved by the FAA, EASA,
the electrical wire and fuel tank structure. provided by the manufacturer if those or Airbus’s EASA DOA.
Investigations have shown that although actions were FAA-approved. In The Contacting the Manufacturer
measures were taken to prevent contact of the paragraph also clarifies that, if approved
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
addition, the paragraph stated that any
harness with the MFLI (through modification actions approved by the State of Design by the DOA, the approval must include
04489), the installation can be subject to the DOA-authorized signature. The DOA
human error. As the MFLI is integral to the
Authority (or its delegated agent) are
access panel in this location, any potential considered to be FAA-approved. signature indicates that the data and
contact with the harness (as a result of In the NPRM (79 FR 19296, April 8, information contained in the document
incorrect installation) is hidden. 2014), we proposed to prevent the use are EASA-approved, which is also FAA-
This condition, if not detected and of repairs that were not specifically approved. Messages and other
corrected, could lead to electrical arcing, developed to correct the unsafe information provided by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:17 Feb 27, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM 02MRR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_11141/page/2.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 11105
street address for the Docket Operations (f) Compliance 2013, which is not incorporated by reference
office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in Comply with this AD within the in this AD.
the ADDRESSES section. compliance times specified, unless already (j) Other FAA AD Provisions
done.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 The following provisions also apply to this
(g) One-Time Inspection and Repair AD:
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
safety, Incorporation by reference, Within 30 months after the effective date
of this AD: Perform a one-time general visual (AMOCs): The Manager, International
Safety. inspection for chafing of the outer tank Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Adoption of the Amendment sensor harness between ribs 26 and 27, in Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
accordance with the Accomplishment approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
Accordingly, under the authority Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300– using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
delegated to me by the Administrator, 28–0091, dated March 5, 2013 (for Model In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as A300 series airplanes); or Airbus Service request to your principal inspector or local
follows: Bulletin A300–28–6109, Revision 01, dated Flight Standards District Office, as
December 20, 2013 (for Model A300–600 appropriate. If sending information directly
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS series airplanes); to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
DIRECTIVES (1) If any previous repairs are identified, or Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
if braid and wire insulation is found International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 damaged with the conductor exposed during Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
continues to read as follows: the inspection required by the introductory Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
text of paragraph (g) of this AD: Before phone: 425–227–2125; fax: 425–227–1149.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. further flight, repair using a method Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-
approved by the Manager, International AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
§ 39.13 [Amended]
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane (i) Before using any approved AMOC,
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation notify your appropriate principal inspector,
the following new airworthiness Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus’s EASA or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
directive (AD): Design Organization Approval (DOA). of the local flight standards district office/
2015–03–03 Airbus: Amendment 39–18099. (2) If the braid and wire insulation is found certificate holding district office. The AMOC
Docket No. FAA–2014–0189; Directorate damaged without the conductor exposed approval letter must specifically reference
Identifier 2013–NM–181–AD. during the inspection required by the this AD.
introductory text of paragraph (g) of this AD: (ii) Except as required by paragraph (g)(1)
(a) Effective Date Before further flight, repair, in accordance of this AD: If the service information contains
This AD becomes effective April 6, 2015. with the Accomplishment Instructions of procedures or tests that are identified as RC
Airbus Service Bulletin A300–28–0091, (Required for Compliance), those procedures
(b) Affected ADs dated March 5, 2013 (for Model A300 series and tests must be done to comply with this
None. airplanes); or Airbus Service Bulletin A300– AD; any procedures and tests that are not
28–6109, Revision 01, dated December 20, identified as RC are recommended. Those
(c) Applicability 2013 (for Model A300–600 series airplanes). procedures and tests that are not identified
This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes as RC may be deviated from using accepted
(h) Modification methods in accordance with the operator’s
specified in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), (c)(3),
(c)(4), and (c)(5) of this AD, certificated in (1) For airplanes on which no damage was maintenance or inspection program without
any category, all manufacturer serial found during the inspection required by the obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
numbers; except for airplanes modified by introductory text of paragraph (g) of this AD: the procedures and tests identified as RC can
supplemental type certificate ST00092BO Before further flight, install modified and be done and the airplane can be put back in
(http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_ error-proof angle brackets to stringer 15 a serviceable condition. Any substitutions or
Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/ between ribs 26 and 27 of the outer tank changes to procedures or tests identified as
D41C5AE8E46B4901862574900069E sensor harness, in accordance with the RC require approval of an AMOC.
004?OpenDocument&Highlight=st00092bo). Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
(1) Model A300 B2–1A, B2–1C, B2K–3C, Service Bulletin A300–28–0091, dated March requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
B2–203, B4–2C, B4–103, and B4–203 5, 2013 (for Model A300 series airplanes); or actions from a manufacturer, the action must
airplanes. Airbus Service Bulletin A300–28–6109, be accomplished using a method approved
(2) Model A300 B4–601, B4–603, B4–620, Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013 (for by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
and B4–622 airplanes. Model A300–600 series airplanes). 116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
(3) Model A300 B4–605R and B4–622R (2) For airplanes on which any damage was the EASA; or Airbus’s EASA DOA. If
airplanes. found during the inspection required by the approved by the DOA, the approval must
(4) Model A300 F4–605R and F4–622R introductory text of paragraph (g) of this AD, include the DOA-authorized signature.
airplanes. and the applicable repair required by
paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD has been (k) Related Information
(5) Model A300 C4–605R Variant F
airplanes. done: Before further flight, install modified (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
and error-proof angle brackets to stringer 15 Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
(d) Subject between ribs 26 and 27 of the outer tank Airworthiness Directive 2013–0193, dated
Air Transport Association (ATA) of sensor harness, in accordance with the August 23, 2013, for related information.
America Code 28, Fuel. Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus This MCAI may be found in the AD docket
Service Bulletin A300–28–0091, dated March on the Internet at http://
(e) Reason 5, 2013 (for Model A300 series airplanes); or www.regulations.gov/
This AD was prompted by a report of Airbus Service Bulletin A300–28–6109, #!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0189-0002.
chafing found on the overflow sensor harness Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013 (for (2) Service information identified in this
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
of the surge tank, and subsequent contact Model A300–600 series airplanes). AD that is not incorporated by reference is
between the electrical wiring and fuel tank available at the addresses specified in
structure. We are issuing this AD to prevent (i) Credit for Previous Actions paragraphs (l)(3) and (l)(4) of this AD.
chafing of the harness and subsequent This paragraph provides credit for actions
contact between the electrical wiring and fuel required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, (l) Material Incorporated by Reference
tank structure, which could result in if those actions were performed before the (1) The Director of the Federal Register
electrical arcing and a fuel tank explosion effective date of this AD using Airbus Service approved the incorporation by reference
and consequent loss of the airplane. Bulletin A300–28–6109, dated March 5, (IBR) of the service information listed in this
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:17 Feb 27, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM 02MRR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_11141/page/5.svg)
![11106 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Background it returns restricted airspace that is no
part 51. longer needed for its designated purpose
(2) You must use this service information Restricted area R–2936, West Palm
Beach, FL, was established to contain to the NAS in the West Palm Beach, FL
as applicable to do the actions required by area.
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. test firings of components for the main
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–28–0091, engines of the Space Shuttle (55 FR Environmental Review
dated March 5, 2013. 5981) May 3, 1990. During test firings,
(ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–28–6109,
The FAA has determined that this
hydrogen gas was released through an action qualifies for categorical exclusion
Revision 01, dated December 20, 2013. exhaust stack generating significant
(3) For service information identified in under the National Environmental
turbulence and high air temperatures Policy Act in accordance with FAA
this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness
Office—EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice
that could be hazardous to aircraft up to Order 1050.1E, Environmental Impacts:
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; 10,000 feet. The restricted area using Policies and Procedures, paragraph
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 agency informed the FAA there are no 311c. This action returns restricted
93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@ plans for further hazardous testing in airspace to the National Airspace
airbus.com; Internet http://www.airbus.com. the area. Therefore, the FAA is taking System. It is not expected to cause any
(4) You may view this service information this action to remove restricted area R–
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
potentially significant environmental
2936. impacts, and no extraordinary
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this The Rule circumstances exist that warrant
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. preparation of an environmental
This action amends Title 14 Code of
(5) You may view this service information assessment.
that is incorporated by reference at the
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 73 by
National Archives and Records removing restricted area R–2936, West List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 73
Administration (NARA). For information on Palm Beach, FL. The using agency Airspace, Prohibited areas, Restricted
the availability of this material at NARA, call notified the FAA that they no longer areas.
202–741–6030, or go to: http:// require the restricted area for hazardous
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr- activities. Adoption of the Amendment
locations.html. Because this action removes restricted In consideration of the foregoing, the
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February airspace no longer needed, and returns Federal Aviation Administration
2, 2015. the airspace to the NAS, I find that amends 14 CFR part 73, as follows:
Jeffrey E. Duven, notice and public procedure under 5
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, U.S.C. 553(b) is unnecessary. PART 73—SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE
Aircraft Certification Service. The FAA has determined that this
action only involves an established ■ 1. The authority citation for part 73
[FR Doc. 2015–02676 Filed 2–27–15; 8:45 am]
body of technical regulations for which continues to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
frequent and routine amendments are Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
necessary to keep them operationally 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is 1963 Comp., p. 389.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ § 73.29 [Amended]
Federal Aviation Administration under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT ■ 2. Section 73.29 is amended as
14 CFR Part 73 Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 follows:
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) * * * * *
[Docket No. FAA–2015–0264; Airspace
does not warrant preparation of a R–2936 West Palm Beach, FL
Docket No. 15–ASO–1]
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated [Removed]
RIN 2120–AA66 impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that only affects air traffic Issued in Washington, DC, on February 19,
Revocation of Restricted Area R–2936, procedures and air navigation, it is 2015.
West Palm Beach, FL certified that this rule, when Gary A. Norek,
promulgated, does not have a significant Manager, Airspace Policy and Regulations
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
economic impact on a substantial Group.
Administration (FAA), DOT.
number of small entities under the [FR Doc. 2015–04296 Filed 2–27–15; 8:45 am]
ACTION: Final rule. criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
SUMMARY: This action removes restricted The FAA’s authority to issue rules
area R–2936, West Palm Beach, FL. The regarding aviation safety is found in
using agency informed the FAA they no Title 49 of the United States Code. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
longer have a requirement for this area; Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Federal Aviation Administration
therefore, the airspace is being returned
to the National Airspace System (NAS). Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the 14 CFR Part 73
DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC, April
agency’s authority. [Docket No. FAA–2015–0265; Airspace
30, 2015. This rulemaking is promulgated Docket No. 14–ASW–11]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul under the authority described in
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Gallant, Airspace Policy and Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section RIN 2120–AA66
Regulations Group, Office of Airspace 40103. Under that section, the FAA is
Services, Federal Aviation Amendment of Restricted Areas R–
charged with prescribing regulations to
Administration, 800 Independence 3801A, R–3801B, and R–3801C; Camp
assign the use of the airspace necessary
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; Claiborne, LA
to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
telephone: (202) 267–8783. efficient use of airspace. This regulation AGENCY:Federal Aviation
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: is within the scope of that authority as Administration (FAA), DOT.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:17 Feb 27, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\02MRR1.SGM 02MRR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_11141/page/6.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-18 12:07:26
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 12:07:26
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This AD becomes effective April 6, 2015. | |
| Contact | Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-227-2125; fax: 425-227-1149. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 11101 | |
| RIN Number | 2120-AA64 | |
| CFR Associated | Air Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR