80 FR 12456 - Large Residential Washers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 45 (March 9, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 45 (March 9, 2015)
| Page Range | 12456-12458 | |
| FR Document | 2015-05473 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 45 (Monday, March 9, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 12456-12458] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-05473] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-868] Large Residential Washers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2014 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large residential washers from the Republic of Korea. The period of review (POR) is August 3, 2012, through January 31, 2014. The review covers three producers and exporters of the subject merchandise, Daewoo Electronics Corporation (Daewoo), LG Electronics, Inc. (LGE), and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Samsung). We preliminarily determine that sales of subject merchandise have been made at prices below normal value. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective Date: March 9, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Goldberger or Reza Karamloo, AD/ CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-4136 or (202) 482-4470, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The products covered by the order are all large residential washers and certain subassemblies thereof from Korea. The products are currently classifiable under subheadings 8450.20.0040 and 8450.20.0080 of the Harmonized Tariff System of the United States (HTSUS). Products subject to this order may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 8450.11.0040, 8450.11.0080, 8450.90.2000, and 8450.90.6000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the [[Page 12457]] merchandise subject to this scope is dispositive.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ``Large Residential Washers from Korea: Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2014,'' dated concurrently with and adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). The HTSUS numbers are revised from the numbers previously stated in the scope. See Memorandum to the File entitled ``Changes to the HTS Numbers to the ACE Case Reference Files for the Antidumping Duty Orders,'' dated January 6, 2015. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department conducted this review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price and constructed export price are calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. Because mandatory respondents Daewoo and Samsung failed to respond to the Department's questionnaire, we preliminarily find it appropriate to use adverse facts available (AFA) in determining their weighted-average dumping margins, in accordance with sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.308. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).\2\ ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and Compliance's AD and CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (``IA ACCESS'') to AD and CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). The Web site location was changed from http://iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The Final Rule changing the references to the Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of the Review As a result of this review, the Department preliminarily determines that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period August 3, 2012, through January 31, 2014. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Manufacturer/exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Daewoo Electronics Corporation.............................. 82.41 LG Electronics, Inc......................................... 1.57 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd................................ 82.41 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure and Public Comment We will disclose the calculations performed to parties in this segment of the proceeding within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Interested parties may submit case briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\3\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\4\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c). \4\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce. All documents must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed request must be received successfully in its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\5\ Requests should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and date to be determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, unless the deadline is extended.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, the Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\7\ If we continue to rely on adverse facts available to establish Daewoo's and Samsung's weighted-average dumping margins, we will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 82.41 percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR which were produced and/or exported by Daewoo and Samsung. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For those sales where LG reported the entered value of its U.S. sales, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of the examined sales to that importer. For those sales where the respondent did not report the entered value of its U.S. sales, we calculated importer-specific or customer-specific per-unit duty assessment rates by aggregating the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales and dividing this amount by the total quantity of those sales. To determine whether this duty assessment rate is de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will calculate an importer-specific ad valorem ratio based on the estimated entered value. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is above de minimis. Where either the exporter's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or the importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted- Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012); 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on May 6, 2003. This clarification will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by LGE for [[Page 12458]] which the reviewed company did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Daewoo, LG, and Samsung will be the rate established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not participating in this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 11.80 percent, the all-others rate established in the less-than-fair-value investigation.\9\ These requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Large Residential Washers From Mexico and the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 78 FR 11148 (February 15, 2013). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: March 2, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of the Methodology A. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences 1. Application of AFA: Daewoo and Samsung 2. Selection of the AFA Rate 3. Corroboration of Secondary Information B. NV Comparisons 1. Determination of Comparison Method 2. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis C. Product Comparisons D. EP and CEP E. NV 1. Home Market Viability and Selection of Comparison Market 2. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm's-Length Test 3. Level of Trade (LOT) F. Cost of Production (COP) Analysis 1. Calculation of COP 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices 3. Results of the COP Test G. Calculation of NV Based on Comparison-Market Prices H. Calculation of NV Based on CV I. Currency Conversion V. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015-05473 Filed 3-6-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![12456 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 45 / Monday, March 9, 2015 / Notices
Administrative and National Policy Notwithstanding any other provision been prepared for this notice, 5 U.S.C.
Requirements of the law, no person is required to 601 et seq.
Uniform Administrative respond to, nor shall any person be
Kevin Kimball,
Requirements, Cost Principles and subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject Chief of Staff.
Audit Requirements: Through 2 CFR [FR Doc. 2015–05297 Filed 3–6–15; 8:45 am]
1327.101, the Department of Commerce to the requirements of the Paperwork
adopted the Uniform Administrative Reduction Act, unless that collection of BILLING CODE 3510–13–P
Requirements, Cost Principles, and information displays a currently valid
Audit Requirements for Federal Awards OMB Control Number.
Certifications Regarding Federal DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
at 2 CFR part 200, which apply to
Felony and Federal Criminal Tax
awards made pursuant to this FFO. International Trade Administration
Convictions, Unpaid Federal Tax
Refer to http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/
Assessments and Delinquent Federal [A–580–868]
text-idx?SID=bd58a13de66200ce25c4fa Tax Returns. In accordance with Federal
5f6fdbf197&node=pt2.1.200&rgn=div5 appropriations law, an authorized Large Residential Washers From the
and http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text- representative of the selected Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results
idx?SID=bd58a13de66200ce25c4fa applicant(s) may be required to provide of the Antidumping Duty
5f6fdbf197&node=pt2.1.1327&rgn=div5. certain pre-award certifications Administrative Review; 2012–2014
The Department of Commerce Pre- regarding federal felony and federal
Award Notification Requirements: The criminal tax convictions, unpaid federal AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Department of Commerce Pre-Award tax assessments, and delinquent federal International Trade Administration,
Notification Requirements for Grants tax returns. Department of Commerce.
and Cooperative Agreements, 79 FR Funding Availability and Limitation SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
78390 (December 30, 2014), are of Liability: Funding for the program (the Department) is conducting an
applicable to this notice and the listed in this notice and the administrative review of the
corresponding FFO and are available at corresponding FFO is contingent upon antidumping duty order on large
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014- the availability of appropriations. In no residential washers from the Republic of
12-30/pdf/2014-30297.pdf. event will NIST or DoC be responsible Korea. The period of review (POR) is
Unique Entity Identifier and System for application preparation costs if this August 3, 2012, through January 31,
for Award Management (SAM): program fails to receive funding or is 2014. The review covers three producers
Pursuant to 2 CFR part 25, applicants cancelled because of agency priorities. and exporters of the subject
and recipients (as the case may be) are Publication of this notice and the merchandise, Daewoo Electronics
required to: (i) Be registered in SAM corresponding FFO does not oblige Corporation (Daewoo), LG Electronics,
before submitting its application; (ii) NIST or DoC to award any specific Inc. (LGE), and Samsung Electronics
provide a valid unique entity identifier project or to obligate any available Co., Ltd. (Samsung). We preliminarily
in its application; and (iii) continue to funds. determine that sales of subject
maintain an active SAM registration Other Administrative and National merchandise have been made at prices
with current information at all times Policy Requirements: Additional below normal value. Interested parties
during which it has an active Federal administrative and national policy are invited to comment on these
award or an application or plan under requirements are set forth in Section preliminary results.
consideration by a Federal awarding VI.2. of the corresponding FFO. DATES: Effective Date: March 9, 2015.
agency, unless otherwise excepted from Executive Order 12866: This funding
these requirements pursuant to 2 CFR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
notice was determined to be not
25.110. NIST will not make a Federal David Goldberger or Reza Karamloo,
significant for purposes of Executive
award to an applicant until the AD/CVD Operations, Office II,
Order 12866.
applicant has complied with all Enforcement and Compliance,
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism):
applicable unique entity identifier and International Trade Administration,
It has been determined that this notice
SAM requirements and, if an applicant U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
does not contain policies with
has not fully complied with the Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
federalism implications as that term is
requirements by the time that NIST is Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202)
defined in Executive Order 13132.
ready to make a Federal award pursuant Executive Order 12372: Proposals 482–4136 or (202) 482–4470,
to this notice and the corresponding under this program are not subject to respectively.
FFO, NIST may determine that the Executive Order 12372, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
applicant is not qualified to receive a ‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Federal award and use that Scope of the Order
Programs.’’
determination as a basis for making a Administrative Procedure Act/ The products covered by the order are
Federal award to another applicant. Regulatory Flexibility Act: Notice and all large residential washers and certain
Paperwork Reduction Act: The comment are not required under the subassemblies thereof from Korea. The
standard forms in the application kit Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. products are currently classifiable under
involve a collection of information 553) or any other law, for matters subheadings 8450.20.0040 and
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act. relating to public property, loans, 8450.20.0080 of the Harmonized Tariff
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The use of Standard Forms 424, 424A, grants, benefits or contracts (5 U.S.C. System of the United States (HTSUS).
424B, SF–LLL, and CD–346 have been 553(a)). Moreover, because notice and Products subject to this order may also
approved by OMB under the respective comment are not required under 5 enter under HTSUS subheadings
Control Numbers 0348–0043, 0348– U.S.C. 553, or any other law, for matters 8450.11.0040, 8450.11.0080,
0044, 0348–0040, 0348–0046, and 0605– relating to public property, loans, 8450.90.2000, and 8450.90.6000.
0001. MEP program-specific application grants, benefits or contracts (5 U.S.C. Although the HTSUS subheadings are
requirements have been approved by 553(a)), a Regulatory Flexibility provided for convenience and customs
OMB under Control Number 0693–0056. Analysis is not required and has not purposes, the written description of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:04 Mar 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM 09MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_12501/page/1.svg)
![12458 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 45 / Monday, March 9, 2015 / Notices
which the reviewed company did not occurred and the subsequent assessment International Trade Administration,
know its merchandise was destined for of double antidumping duties. U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
the United States. In such instances, we We are issuing and publishing these Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
will instruct CBP to liquidate results in accordance with sections Washington, DC 20230; telephone
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 202.482.0413.
if there is no rate for the intermediate CFR 351.221(b)(4).
company(ies) involved in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: March 2, 2015.
transaction. For a full discussion of this Paul Piquado, Background
clarification, see Antidumping and Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Compliance.
On February 4, 2015, based on a
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 timely request for review by
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in Petitioners,1 the Department published
We intend to issue instructions to the Preliminary Decision Memorandum in the Federal Register a notice of
CBP 15 days after the publication date I. Summary initiation of an administrative review of
of the final results of this review. II. Background the antidumping duty order on steel
III. Scope of the Order wire garment hangers for 30 companies,
Cash Deposit Requirements
IV. Discussion of the Methodology covering the period December 1, 2013,
The following cash deposit A. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and through November 30, 2014.2 On
requirements will be effective for all Adverse Inferences February 19, 2015, Petitioners withdrew
shipments of the subject merchandise 1. Application of AFA: Daewoo and their request for an administrative
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, Samsung review of these companies.3
for consumption on or after the 2. Selection of the AFA Rate
publication date of the final results of
3. Corroboration of Secondary Information Rescission of Review
B. NV Comparisons
this administrative review, as provided 1. Determination of Comparison Method Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 2. Results of the Differential Pricing Department will rescind an
The cash deposit rate for Daewoo, LG, Analysis administrative review if the party that
and Samsung will be the rate C. Product Comparisons requested the review withdraws its
established in the final results of this D. EP and CEP request within 90 days of the
review, except if the rate is less than E. NV
1. Home Market Viability and Selection of
publication of the notice of initiation of
0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis the requested review. Petitioners
within the meaning of 19 CFR Comparison Market
2. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm’s- withdrew their request within the 90-
351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash Length Test day deadline. No other party requested
deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 3. Level of Trade (LOT) an administrative review of the
previously reviewed or investigated F. Cost of Production (COP) Analysis antidumping duty order. As a result, we
companies not participating in this 1. Calculation of COP are rescinding the administrative review
review, the cash deposit rate will 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices of steel wire garment hangers from
continue to be the company-specific rate 3. Results of the COP Test Taiwan for the POR.
published for the most recent period; (3) G. Calculation of NV Based on
if the exporter is not a firm covered in Comparison-Market Prices Assessment
this review, a prior review, or the H. Calculation of NV Based on CV
I. Currency Conversion The Department will instruct U.S.
original investigation, but the V. Recommendation Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
[FR Doc. 2015–05473 Filed 3–6–15; 8:45 am] to assess antidumping duties on all
will be the rate established for the most
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P appropriate entries. Because the
recent period for the manufacturer of
Department is rescinding this
the merchandise; and (4) the cash
administrative review in its entirety, the
deposit rate for all other manufacturers
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE entries to which this administrative
or exporters will continue to be 11.80
review pertained shall be assessed
percent, the all-others rate established International Trade Administration antidumping duties at rates equal to the
in the less-than-fair-value
[A–583–849] cash deposit of estimated antidumping
investigation.9 These requirements,
duties required at the time of entry, or
when imposed, shall remain in effect
Steel Wire Garment Hangers From withdrawal from warehouse, for
until further notice.
Taiwan: Rescission of Antidumping consumption, in accordance with 19
Notification to Importers Duty Administrative Review CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
This notice also serves as a intends to issue appropriate assessment
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, instructions to CBP 15 days after the
preliminary reminder to importers of International Trade Administration,
their responsibility under 19 CFR publication of this notice.
Department of Commerce.
351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
DATES: Effective Date: March 9, 2015. 1 M&B Metal Products Company, Inc., Innovative
the reimbursement of antidumping SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Fabrication LLC/Indy Hanger and US Hanger
duties prior to liquidation of the (the ‘‘Department’’) is rescinding the Company, LLC (collectively ‘‘Petitioners’’).
relevant entries during this review administrative review of the 2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
period. Failure to comply with this antidumping duty order on steel wire Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR
requirement could result in the 6041 (February 4, 2015) (‘‘Initiation’’). One
garment hangers from Taiwan for the company, Golden Sources Enterprise Co., Ltd.,
Secretary’s presumption that period of review (‘‘POR’’), December 1, which was inadvertently listed in the Initiation,
reimbursement of antidumping duties 2013, through November 30, 2014. was not requested for review by Petitioners.
3 See letter from Petitioners, ‘‘Re: Second
9 See Large Residential Washers From Mexico and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Administrative Review of Steel Wire Garment
the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, Walker, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Hangers from Taiwan—Petitioners’ Withdrawal of
78 FR 11148 (February 15, 2013). Enforcement and Compliance, Review Request,’’ dated February 19, 2015.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:04 Mar 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM 09MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_12501/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-18 12:05:47
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 12:05:47
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | David Goldberger or Reza Karamloo, AD/ CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-4136 or (202) 482-4470, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 12456 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR