80 FR 13244 - Safety Zone; St. Patrick's Day Fireworks, Manitowoc River, Manitowoc, Wisconsin

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 49 (March 13, 2015)

Page Range		13244-13246
FR Document		2015-05814

The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone on the Manitowoc River in Manitowoc, Wisconsin. This safety zone is intended to restrict vessels from a portion of the Manitowoc River due to a fireworks display. This safety zone is necessary to protect the surrounding public and vessels from the hazards associated with the fireworks display.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 49 (Friday, March 13, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 49 (Friday, March 13, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13244-13246]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05814]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR PART 165

[Docket No. USCG-2015-0130]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; St. Patrick's Day Fireworks, Manitowoc River, 
Manitowoc, Wisconsin

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone on the Manitowoc 
River in Manitowoc, Wisconsin. This safety zone is intended to restrict 
vessels from a portion of the Manitowoc River due to a fireworks 
display. This safety zone is necessary to protect the surrounding 
public and vessels from the hazards associated with the fireworks 
display.

DATES: This rule is effective and will be enforced from 6 p.m. until 
8:30 p.m. on March 13, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket 
USCG-2015-0130. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the 
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also 
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground 
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
contact or email MST1 Joseph McCollum, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Lake 
Michigan, at 414-747-7148 or [email protected]. If you have 
questions on viewing the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, 
Docket Operations, telephone 1-800-647-5527.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

A. Regulatory History and Information

    On December 24, 2014, the Coast Guard published an NPRM in the 
Federal Register which listed safety zones corresponding to annual 
marine events in the Sector Lake Michigan zone (79 FR 77415). This NPRM 
included the safety zone for the St. Patrick's Day Fireworks in 
Manitowoc, WI (the subject of this TFR). After the 30 day comment 
period for the NPRM closed, the Coast Guard published a corresponding 
Final Rule on February 18, 2015 (80 FR 8536).
    Because the Manitowoc St. Patrick's Day Fireworks would occur 
within 30 days of the Final Rule's publication, the Coast Guard finds 
that good cause exists under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), for making this rule 
effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. 
Waiting for a 30 day notice period to run would be impracticable, 
unnecessary, and contrary to the public interest because it would 
inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to protect vessels from the hazards 
associated with the Manitowoc St. Patrick's Day Fireworks on March 13, 
2015, which are discussed further below.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for this rule is the Coast Guard's authority to 
establish safety zones: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 160.5; 
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
    On March 13, 2015, the City of Manitowoc is expected to hold its 
annual St. Patrick's Day fireworks display. This fireworks display will 
be launched from the shore of the Manitowoc River. The Captain of the 
Port Lake Michigan has determined that this fireworks display will pose 
a significant risk to public safety and property. Such hazards include 
falling and/or flaming debris.

C. Discussion of the Final Rule

    With the aforementioned hazards in mind, the Captain of the Port 
Lake Michigan has determined that this safety zone is necessary to 
ensure the safety of persons and vessels during the fireworks display 
on the shore of the Manitowoc River. This zone is effective and will be 
enforced from 6 p.m. until 8:30 p.m. on March 13, 2015. The safety zone 
will encompass all waters of the Manitowoc River within a 200 foot 
radius of an approximate launch position at 44[deg]05.492' N, 
087[deg]39.332' W (NAD 83).
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is 
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan 
or her designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or 
her designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 
16.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on these statutes and executive orders.

 1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as 
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and 
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential 
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or 
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and

[[Page 13245]]

Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. It is not 
``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of the 
Department of Homeland Security (DHS). We conclude that this rule is 
not a significant regulatory action because we anticipate that it will 
have minimal impact on the economy, will not interfere with other 
agencies, will not adversely alter the budget of any grant or loan 
recipients, and will not raise any novel legal or policy issues. The 
safety zone created by this rule will be relatively small and enforced 
for only one day. Under certain conditions, moreover, vessels may still 
transit through the safety zone when permitted by the Captain of the 
Port.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered the impact of this rule on small entities. The Coast Guard 
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might be 
small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to transit 
or anchor in the affected portion of the Manitowoc River on March 13, 
2015.
    This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities for the reasons cited in the 
Regulatory Planning and Review section. Additionally, before the 
enforcement of this zone, we would issue local Broadcast Notice to 
Mariners so vessel owners and operators can plan accordingly.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined 
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the ``For Further 
Information Contact'' section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive 
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect 
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined 
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not 
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human 
environment. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone and 
therefore it is categorically excluded from further review under 
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An 
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a 
Categorical Exclusion Determination for this zone have been previously 
completed and are available via http://www.regulations.gov under Docket 
Number USCG-2014-1001. We seek any comments or information that may 
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this 
rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record 
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.


[[Page 13246]]


    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR parts 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. 
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0130 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T09-0130  Safety Zone; St. Patrick's Day Fireworks, Manitowoc 
River, Manitowoc, Wisconsin.

    (a) Location. All waters of the Manitowoc River within a 200 foot 
radius of an approximate launch position at 44[deg]05.492' N, 
087[deg]39.332' W (NAD 83).
    (b) Effective and enforcement period. This zone is effective and 
will be enforced from 6 p.m. until 8:30 p.m. on March 13, 2015.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within 
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the 
Port Lake Michigan or her designated on-scene representative.
    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may 
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her designated 
on-scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port Lake 
Michigan is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who 
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan to act on 
her behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety 
zone must contact the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her on-scene 
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port 
Lake Michigan or her on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF 
Channel 16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in 
the safety zone must comply with all directions given to them by the 
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or her on-scene representative.

    Dated: March 2, 2015.
A.B. Cocanour,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2015-05814 Filed 3-12-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 49 / Friday, March 13, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 13245

Budget has not reviewed it under those employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– Children from Environmental Health
Orders. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
regulatory policies and procedures of Coast Guard will not retaliate against an economically significant rule and
the Department of Homeland Security small entities that question or complain does not create an environmental risk to
(DHS). We conclude that this rule is not about this rule or any policy or action health or risk to safety that may
a significant regulatory action because of the Coast Guard. disproportionately affect children.
we anticipate that it will have minimal
4. Collection of Information 11. Indian Tribal Governments
impact on the economy, will not
interfere with other agencies, will not This rule will not call for a new This rule does not have tribal
adversely alter the budget of any grant collection of information under the implications under Executive Order
or loan recipients, and will not raise any Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 13175, Consultation and Coordination
novel legal or policy issues. The safety U.S.C. 3501–3520). with Indian Tribal Governments,
zone created by this rule will be 5. Federalism because it does not have a substantial
relatively small and enforced for only direct effect on one or more Indian
one day. Under certain conditions, A rule has implications for federalism
tribes, on the relationship between the
moreover, vessels may still transit under Executive Order 13132,
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
through the safety zone when permitted Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
or on the distribution of power and
by the Captain of the Port. effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and responsibilities between the Federal
2. Impact on Small Entities the States, or on the distribution of Government and Indian tribes.
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act power and responsibilities among the 12. Energy Effects
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and This action is not a ‘‘significant
the impact of this rule on small entities.
determined that this rule does not have energy action’’ under Executive Order
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
implications for federalism. 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
605(b) that this rule will not have a
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
significant economic impact on a 6. Protest Activities Distribution, or Use.
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following The Coast Guard respects the First 13. Technical Standards
entities, some of which might be small Amendment rights of protesters.
entities: the owners or operators of Protesters are asked to contact the This rule does not use technical
vessels intending to transit or anchor in person listed in the ‘‘For Further standards. Therefore, we did not
the affected portion of the Manitowoc Information Contact’’ section to consider the use of voluntary consensus
River on March 13, 2015. coordinate protest activities so that your standards.
This safety zone will not have a message can be received without
14. Environment
significant economic impact on a jeopardizing the safety or security of
substantial number of small entities for people, places, or vessels. We have analyzed this rule under
the reasons cited in the Regulatory Department of Homeland Security
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Planning and Review section. Management Directive 023–01 and
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
Additionally, before the enforcement of of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
this zone, we would issue local which guide the Coast Guard in
Federal agencies to assess the effects of complying with the National
Broadcast Notice to Mariners so vessel their discretionary regulatory actions. In
owners and operators can plan Environmental Policy Act of 1969
particular, the Act addresses actions (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
accordingly. that may result in the expenditure by a have determined that this action is one
3. Assistance for Small Entities State, local, or tribal government, in the of a category of actions that do not
Under section 213(a) of the Small aggregate, or by the private sector of individually or cumulatively have a
Business Regulatory Enforcement $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or significant effect on the human
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), more in any one year. Though this rule environment. This rule involves the
we want to assist small entities in will not result in such an expenditure, establishment of a safety zone and
understanding this rule. If the rule we do discuss the effects of this rule therefore it is categorically excluded
elsewhere in this preamble. from further review under paragraph
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental 8. Taking of Private Property 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
jurisdiction and you have questions Instruction. An environmental analysis
This rule will not cause a taking of
concerning its provisions or options for checklist supporting this determination
private property or otherwise have
compliance, please contact the person taking implications under Executive and a Categorical Exclusion
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Determination for this zone have been
CONTACT section above. Interference with Constitutionally previously completed and are available
Small businesses may send comments Protected Property Rights. via http://www.regulations.gov under
on the actions of Federal employees Docket Number USCG–2014–1001. We
who enforce, or otherwise determine 9. Civil Justice Reform seek any comments or information that
compliance with, Federal regulations to This rule meets applicable standards may lead to the discovery of a
the Small Business and Agriculture in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive significant environmental impact from
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to this rule.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES

and the Regional Small Business minimize litigation, eliminate List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Ombudsman evaluates these actions Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
annually and rates each agency’s 10. Protection of Children (water), Reporting and record keeping
responsiveness to small business. If you We have analyzed this rule under requirements, Security measures,
wish to comment on actions by Executive Order 13045, Protection of Waterways.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:34 Mar 12, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\13MRR1.SGM 13MRR1

Document Created: 2015-12-18 11:41:46
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 11:41:46

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective and will be enforced from 6 p.m. until 8:30 p.m. on March 13, 2015.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, contact or email MST1 Joseph McCollum, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan, at 414-747-7148 or [email protected] If you have questions on viewing the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 1-800-647-5527.
FR Citation		80 FR 13244
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Record Keeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

80 FR 13244 - Safety Zone; St. Patrick's Day Fireworks, Manitowoc River, Manitowoc, Wisconsin

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 49 (March 13, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard