80 FR 13833 - Helical Spring Lock Washers From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 51 (March 17, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 51 (March 17, 2015)
| Page Range | 13833-13835 | |
| FR Document | 2015-05957 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 51 (Tuesday, March 17, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 13833-13835] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-05957] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-822] Helical Spring Lock Washers From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On November 7, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain helical spring lock washers (HSLW) [[Page 13834]] from the People's Republic of China (PRC).\1\ The period of review (POR) is October 1, 2012, through September 30, 2013. For the final results, we continue to find that Jiangsu RC Import & Export Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu RC) made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. We also continue to find that Suzhou Guoxin Group Wang Shun Imp. and Exp. Co., Ltd. (Guoxin) is not eligible for a separate rate and remains part of the PRC-wide entity. Finally, we are not rescinding the review with respect to Winnsen Industry Co., Ltd. (Winnsen). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Helical Spring Lock Washers From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 66356 (November 7, 2014) (Preliminary Results). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective Date: March 17, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Kolberg or Sergio Balbontin, AD/ CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 1785, (202) 482-6478, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On November 7, 2014, the Department published the Preliminary Results. We received case and rebuttal briefs with respect to the Preliminary Results. We conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order are HSLWs. The product is currently classified under subheading 7318.21.0000, 7318.21.0030, and 7318.21.0090 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description is dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Memorandum ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Helical Spring Lock Washers From the People's Republic of China; 2012-2013'' dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as an appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).\3\ ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is also available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and Compliance's AD and CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS) to AD and CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). The Web site location was changed from http://iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The Final Rule changing the references to the regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of comments received, we made revisions that have changed the results for Jiangsu RC. These changes include changes to the valuation of certain factors of production and calculation programming changes. For further details on the changes we made for these final results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. PRC-Wide Rate and PRC-Wide Entity For the Preliminary Results, the Department assigned to the PRC- wide entity the rate of 128.63 percent, the rate determined for the PRC-wide entity in this proceeding.\4\ Based on comments from interested parties in this administrative review, as discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we have calculated a final margin for Jiangsu RC of 192.88 percent, which is also the new rate for the PRC- wide entity.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Helical Spring Lock Washers From the People's Republic of China, 58 FR 53914 (October 19, 1993) and Amended Final Determination and Amended Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Helical Spring Lock Washers From the People's Republic of China, 58 FR 61859 (November 23, 1993). \5\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the Preliminary Results, the Department determined that Guoxin, which ceased participating in this review, did not demonstrate its eligibility for a separate rate and, therefore, Guoxin is part of the PRC-wide entity. No party commented on this finding. For the final results, we have continued to treat Guoxin as part of the PRC-wide entity. In the Preliminary Results we also determined that, while the request for review had been timely withdrawn for Winnsen, Winnsen did not have a separate rate prior to the Preliminary Results. Accordingly, the Department did not rescind the review with respect to Winnsen and it remained part of the PRC-wide entity, which remained under review.\6\ No party commented on this finding. For the final results, we continue to treat Winnsen as part of the PRC-wide entity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See, e.g., Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR 47363, 47365 (August 8, 2012), unchanged in Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010-2011, 78 FR 10130 (February 13, 2013). As noted in the Preliminary Results, a change in practice with respect to the conditional review of the PRC-wide entity is not applicable to this administrative review. See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65964, 65969-70 (November 4, 2013). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results of the Review As a result of this administrative review, we determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jiangsu RC Import & Export Co., Ltd........................ 192.88 PRC-wide Rate.............................................. 192.88 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. For customers or importers of Jiangsu RC for which we do not have entered value, we calculated customer-/importer- specific antidumping duty assessment amounts based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping duties calculated for the examined sales of subject merchandise to the total sales quantity of those same sales.\7\ For customers or importers of Jiangsu RC for which we received entered- value [[Page 13835]] information, we have calculated customer/importer-specific antidumping duty assessment rates based on customer/importer-specific ad valorem rates in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department announced a refinement to its assessment practice in NME cases.\8\ Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by companies individually examined during this review, including, in this case, Guoxin and Winnsen, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the revised PRC-wide rate of 192.88 percent. In addition, for companies for which the Department determined that the exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of these final results of review for all shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject merchandise exported by the companies listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in these final results of review for each exporter as listed above; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity; (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. These final results of review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: March 9, 2015. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Scope of the Order 4. Separate Rate/PRC-Wide Entity 5. Surrogate Country 6. Discussion of the Issues Surrogate Values Comment 1: Whether the Department Used the Correct Surrogate Value and/or Time Period for Hot-Rolled Circular Silico-Manganese Steel Bar Comment 2: Whether the Department's SAS Program Included a Value for Plywood Comment 3: Whether the Department's SAS Program Properly Calculated TOTCOM Financial Statements/Ratios Comment 4: Whether the Department Should Use the Financial Statements of System 3 Comment 5: Whether the Department Should Use the Financial Statements of Mahajak Autoparts, and Hitech Fasteners Comment 6: Whether the Department Should Adjust the Financial Ratio Calculations Based on the Financial Statements of Siam Anchor, System 3, and Bangkok Fastenings Value-Added Taxes Comment 7: Whether the Department Should Continue to Deduct from U.S. Price Irrecoverable Value-Added Tax 7. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015-05957 Filed 3-16-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 17, 2015 / Notices 13833
evidence other than factual information considered untimely for submissions appearance as discussed in 19 CFR
described in (i)–(iv). The final rule which are due from multiple parties 351.103(d)).
requires any party, when submitting simultaneously. In such a case, the This notice is issued and published
factual information, to specify under Department will inform parties in a pursuant to section 777(i) of the Act and
which subsection of 19 CFR letter or memorandum setting forth the 19 CFR 351.203(c).
351.102(b)(21) the information is being deadline (including a specified time) by Dated: March 11, 2015.
submitted and, if the information is which extension requests must be filed Christian Marsh
submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct to be considered timely. This Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
factual information already on the modification also requires that an and Countervailing Duty Operations.
record, to provide an explanation extension request be made in a separate,
identifying the information already on stand-alone submission, and clarifies Appendix I
the record that the factual information the circumstances under which the Scope of the Investigation
seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The Department will grant untimely-filed The scope of this investigation covers all
final rule also modified 19 CFR 351.301 requests for the extension of time limits. forms, sizes and compositions of
so that, rather than providing general These modifications are effective for all silicomanganese, except low-carbon
time limits, there are specific time limits segments initiated on or after October silicomanganese, including silicomanganese
based on the type of factual information 21, 2013, and thus are applicable to this briquettes, fines, and slag. Silicomanganese is
being submitted. These modifications investigation. Interested parties should a ferroalloy composed principally of
are effective for all proceeding segments review Extension of Time Limits; Final manganese, silicon, and iron, and normally
initiated on or after May 10, 2013, and Rule, available at http://www.gpo.gov/ contains much smaller proportions of minor
thus are applicable to this investigation. fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013- elements, such as carbon, phosphorus, and
Interested parties should review the sulfur. Silicomanganese is sometimes
22853.htm, prior to submitting requests referred to as ferrosilicon manganese.
final rule, available at http:// to extend time limits in this Silicomanganese generally contains by
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/ investigation. weight not less than 4 percent iron, more
1304frn/2013-08227.txt prior to than 30 percent manganese, more than 8
submitting factual information in this Certification Requirements
percent silicon and not more than 0.2 percent
investigation. phosphorus. Silicomanganese is properly
Any party submitting factual
Revised Extension of Time Limits information in an AD or CVD classifiable under subheading 7202.30.0000
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
Regulation proceeding must certify to the accuracy United States (‘‘HTSUS’’).
On September 20, 2013, the and completeness of that information.47 Low-carbon silicomanganese is excluded
Department modified its regulation Parties are hereby reminded that revised from the scope of this investigation. It is
concerning the extension of time limits certification requirements are in effect sometimes referred to as ferromanganese-
for submissions in AD and CVD for company/government officials, as silicon. The low-carbon silicomanganese
proceedings.46 The modification well as their representatives. excluded from this investigation is a
Investigations initiated on the basis of ferroalloy with the following chemical
clarifies that parties may request an
petitions filed on or after August 16, specifications by weight: minimum 55
extension of time limits before a time percent manganese, minimum 27 percent
limit established under 19 CFR part 351 2013, and other segments of any AD or
silicon, minimum 4 percent iron, maximum
expires, or as otherwise specified by the CVD proceedings initiated on or after 0.10 percent phosphorus, maximum 0.10
Secretary. In general, an extension August 16, 2013, should use the formats percent carbon, and maximum 0.05 percent
request will be considered untimely if it for the revised certifications provided at sulfur. Low-carbon silicomanganese is
is filed after the time limit established the end of the Final Rule.48 The classifiable under HTSUS subheading
under Part 351 expires. For submissions Department intends to reject factual 7202.30.0000.
which are due from multiple parties submissions if the submitting party does The HTSUS subheadings are provided for
not comply with the applicable revised convenience and customs purposes. The
simultaneously, an extension request
certification requirements. written description of the scope is
will be considered untimely if it is filed dispositive.
after 10:00 a.m. on the due date. Notification to Interested Parties [FR Doc. 2015–06142 Filed 3–16–15; 8:45 am]
Examples include but are not limited to: BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
(1) Case and rebuttal briefs, filed Interested parties must submit
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; (2) factual applications for disclosure under
information to value factors under 19 administrative protective orders DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
CFR 351.408(c), or to measure the (‘‘APO’’) in accordance with 19 CFR
adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.305. On January 22, 2008, the International Trade Administration
351.511(a)(2) filed pursuant to 19 CFR Department published Antidumping
[A–570–822]
351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, clarification and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
and correction information filed Documents Submission Procedures; Helical Spring Lock Washers From the
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January People’s Republic of China: Final
comments concerning the selection of a 22, 2008). Parties wishing to participate Results of Antidumping Duty
surrogate country and surrogate values in this investigation should ensure that Administrative Review; 2012–2013
and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning they meet the requirements of these
U.S. Customs and Border Protection procedures (e.g., the filing of letters of AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
data; and (5) quantity and value International Trade Administration,
questionnaires. Under certain 47 See section 782(b) of the Act. Department of Commerce.
circumstances, the Department may 48 See Certification of Factual Information To SUMMARY: On November 7, 2014, the
elect to specify a different time limit by Import Administration During Antidumping and Department of Commerce (the
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July Department) published the preliminary
which extension requests will be 17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also frequently asked
questions regarding the Final Rule, available at
results of the administrative review of
46 See Extension of Time Limits; Final Rule, 78 FR http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_ the antidumping duty order on certain
57790 (September 20, 2013). info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. helical spring lock washers (HSLW)
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:09 Mar 16, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM 17MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_13884/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 17, 2015 / Notices 13835
information, we have calculated Notification Comment 7: Whether the Department
customer/importer-specific Should Continue to Deduct from U.S.
This notice serves as a final reminder Price Irrecoverable Value-Added Tax
antidumping duty assessment rates
to importers of their responsibility 7. Recommendation
based on customer/importer-specific ad
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a [FR Doc. 2015–05957 Filed 3–16–15; 8:45 am]
valorem rates in accordance with 19
certificate regarding the reimbursement
CFR 351.212(b)(1). BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
of antidumping duties prior to
The Department announced a liquidation of the relevant entries
refinement to its assessment practice in during this review period. Failure to DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
NME cases.8 Pursuant to this refinement comply with this requirement could
in practice, for entries that were not result in the Secretary’s presumption Economic Development Administration
reported in the U.S. sales databases that reimbursement of the antidumping
submitted by companies individually duties occurred and the subsequent Proposed Information Collection;
examined during this review, including, assessment of double antidumping Comment Request; Comprehensive
in this case, Guoxin and Winnsen, the duties. Economic Development Strategy
Department will instruct CBP to This notice also serves as the only
liquidate such entries at the revised AGENCY: Economic Development
reminder to parties subject to Administration (EDA), Department of
PRC-wide rate of 192.88 percent. In administrative protective order (APO) of
addition, for companies for which the Commerce.
their responsibility concerning the ACTION: Notice.
Department determined that the return or destruction of proprietary
exporter under review had no information disclosed under APO in SUMMARY: The Department of
shipments of the subject merchandise, accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Commerce, as part of its continuing
any suspended entries that entered Timely written notification of the return effort to reduce paperwork and
under that exporter’s case number (i.e., or destruction of APO materials or respondent burden, invites the general
at that exporter’s rate) will be liquidated conversion to judicial protective order is public and other Federal agencies to
at the PRC-wide rate. hereby requested. Failure to comply take this opportunity to comment on
We intend to issue assessment with the regulations and terms of an proposed and/or continuing information
instructions to CBP 15 days after the APO is a sanctionable violation. collections, as required by the
date of publication of the final results of These final results of review are Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
review. issued and published in accordance DATES: Written comments must be
Cash Deposit Requirements with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the submitted on or before May 18, 2015.
Act. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
The following cash deposit Dated: March 9, 2015. to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
requirements will be effective upon Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
publication of these final results of Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
review for all shipments of the subject Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance. 14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
merchandise from the PRC entered, or Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
withdrawn from warehouse, for Appendix I Internet at JJessup@doc.gov).
consumption on or after the publication List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
date as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) Decision Memorandum Requests for additional information or
of the Act: (1) For subject merchandise
1. Summary copies of the information collection
exported by the companies listed above 2. Background instrument and instructions should be
that have separate rates, the cash 3. Scope of the Order directed to David Ives, Senior Program
deposit rate will be the rate established 4. Separate Rate/PRC-Wide Entity Analyst, Performance and National
in these final results of review for each 5. Surrogate Country Programs Division, Room 71030,
exporter as listed above; (2) for 6. Discussion of the Issues
Surrogate Values
Economic Development Administration,
previously investigated or reviewed PRC
Comment 1: Whether the Department Used 14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
and non-PRC exporters not listed above
the Correct Surrogate Value and/or Time Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
that received a separate rate in a prior
Period for Hot-Rolled Circular Silico- Internet at dives@eda.gov).
segment of this proceeding, the cash
Manganese Steel Bar SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
deposit rate will continue to be the Comment 2: Whether the Department’s
exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC SAS Program Included a Value for I. Abstract
exporters of subject merchandise that Plywood The mission of the Economic
have not been found to be entitled to a Comment 3: Whether the Department’s
Development Administration (EDA) is
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will SAS Program Properly Calculated
TOTCOM to lead the federal economic
be that for the PRC-wide entity; (4) for
Financial Statements/Ratios development agenda by promoting
all non-PRC exporters of subject
Comment 4: Whether the Department innovation and competitiveness,
merchandise which have not received
Should Use the Financial Statements of preparing American regions for growth
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
System 3 and success in the worldwide economy.
be the rate applicable to the PRC Comment 5: Whether the Department In order to effectively administer and
exporter that supplied that non-PRC Should Use the Financial Statements of
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
monitor its economic development
exporter. These deposit requirements Mahajak Autoparts, and Hitech Fasteners assistance programs, EDA collects
shall remain in effect until further Comment 6: Whether the Department certain information from applications
notice. Should Adjust the Financial Ratio
Calculations Based on the Financial
for, and recipients of, EDA investment
8 For a full discussion of this practice, see Non- Statements of Siam Anchor, System 3, assistance. This 60-day Federal Register
Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: and Bangkok Notice covers: Comprehensive
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 Fastenings Economic Development Strategy
(October 24, 2011). Value-Added Taxes (CEDS). The collection of this
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:09 Mar 16, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM 17MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_13884/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-18 12:01:13
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 12:01:13
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Mary Kolberg or Sergio Balbontin, AD/ CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 1785, (202) 482-6478, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 13833 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR