80 FR 14041 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Determination of Attainment of the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard for the Baltimore, Maryland Moderate Nonattainment Area
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 52 (March 18, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 52 (March 18, 2015)
| Page Range | 14041-14044 | |
| FR Document | 2015-06220 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 52 (Wednesday, March 18, 2015)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 14041-14044] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-06220] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R03-OAR-2014-0884; FRL-9924-55-Region 3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Determination of Attainment of the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard for the Baltimore, Maryland Moderate Nonattainment Area AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to make a determination that the Baltimore, Maryland Moderate Nonattainment Area (Baltimore Area) has attained the 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). This [[Page 14042]] proposed determination is based upon complete, quality-assured, and certified ambient air monitoring data that shows the Area has monitored attainment of the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the 2012-2014 monitoring period. If this proposal becomes final, the requirement for this Area to submit an attainment demonstration, reasonably available control measures (RACM), a reasonable further progress (RFP) plan, and contingency measures related to attainment of the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS shall be suspended for so long as the Area continues to attain the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. This action does not constitute a redesignation to attainment. The Baltimore Area will remain nonattainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS until such time as EPA determines that the Baltimore Area meets the Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for redesignation to attainment, including an approved maintenance plan. This action is being taken under the CAA. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before April 17, 2015. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA- R03-OAR-2014-0884 by one of the following methods: A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. B. Email: [email protected]. C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2014-0884, Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director, Office of Air Program Planning, Mailcode 3AP30, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR- 2014-0884. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change, and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Shandruk, (215) 814-2166, or by email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background On March 12, 2008, EPA revised both the primary and secondary NAAQS for ozone to a level of 0.075 parts per million (ppm) (annual fourth- highest daily maximum 8-hour average concentration, averaged over three years) to provide increased protection of public health and the environment. 73 FR 16436 (March 27, 2008).\1\ The 2008 ozone NAAQS retains the same general form and averaging time as the 0.08 ppm NAAQS set in 1997, but is set at a more protective level. On May 21, 2012 (77 FR 30088), effective July 20, 2012, EPA designated as nonattainment any area that was violating the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS based on the three most recent years (2008-2010) of air monitoring data. The Baltimore Area (specifically, Anne Arundel County, Baltimore City, Baltimore County, Carroll County, Harford County, and Howard County) was designated as a moderate ozone nonattainment area. See 40 CFR 81.321. Moderate areas are required to attain the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS by no later than six years after the effective date of designations, or July 20, 2018. See 40 CFR 51.903. Air quality monitoring data from the 2012- 2014 monitoring period indicate that the Baltimore Area is now attaining the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ For a detailed explanation of the calculation of the 3-year 8-hour average, see 40 CFR part 50, appendix I. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Under the provisions of EPA's ozone implementation rule (40 CFR 51.918), if EPA issues a determination that an area is attaining the relevant standard (through a rulemaking that includes public notice and comment), it will suspend the area's obligations to submit an attainment demonstration, RACM, RFP, contingency measures and other planning requirements related to attainment of the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for as long as the area continues to attain the standard. This suspension remains in effect until such time, if ever, that EPA (i) redesignates the area to attainment at which time those requirements no longer apply, or (ii) subsequently determines that the area has violated the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Although these requirements are suspended, EPA is not precluded from acting upon these elements at any time if submitted to EPA for review and approval. The determination of attainment is not equivalent to a redesignation under section 107(d)(3) of the CAA. The designation status of the Baltimore Area will remain nonattainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS until such time as EPA determines that the Area meets the CAA requirements for redesignation to attainment, including an approved maintenance plan. Additionally, the determination of attainment is separate from, and does not influence or otherwise affect, any future designation determination or requirements for the Baltimore Area based on any new or revised ozone NAAQS, and it remains in effect regardless of whether EPA designates this Area as a nonattainment area for purposes of any new or revised ozone NAAQS. II. EPA's Evaluation For ozone, an area may be considered to be attaining the 2008 8- hour ozone NAAQS if there are no violations, as determined in accordance with 40 CFR part 50, based on three complete, consecutive calendar years of quality-assured ambient air monitoring data. Under EPA regulations at 40 CFR part 50, the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS is attained when the 3-year average of the [[Page 14043]] annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentrations at an ozone monitor is less than or equal to 0.075 ppm. See 40 CFR part 50, appendix P. This 3-year average is referred to as the design value. When the design value is less than or equal to 0.075 ppm at each monitor within the area, then the area is attaining the NAAQS. Also, the data completeness requirement is met when the average percent of days with valid ambient monitoring data is greater than or equal to 90 percent (%), and no single year has less than 75% data completeness as determined in appendix P of 40 CFR part 50. The data must be collected and quality-assured in accordance with 40 CFR part 58, and recorded in the EPA Air Quality System (AQS). EPA has reviewed the complete, quality-assured and certified ozone ambient air monitoring data for the monitoring period for 2012-2014 for the Baltimore Area. The design values for each monitor for the years 2012-2014 are less than or equal to 0.075 ppm, and all monitors meet the data completeness requirements (see Table 1). Based on this 2012- 2014 data from the AQS database and consistent with the requirements contained in 40 CFR part 50, EPA has concluded that this Area attained the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Table 1--2012-2014 Baltimore Area 2008 8-Hour Ozone Design Values ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Average 2012-2014 Monitor ID percent data Design value completeness (ppm) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 24-003-0014............................. 97 0.074 24-005-1007............................. 95 0.072 24-005-3001............................. 99 0.072 24-013-0001............................. 99 0.069 24-025-1001............................. 98 0.075 24-025-9001............................. 96 0.073 24-510-0054............................. 90 0.064 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The data in Table 1 are available in EPA's AQS database. The AQS report with this data is available in the docket for this rulemaking under docket number EPA-R03-OAR-2014-0884 and available online at www.regulations.gov, docket number EPA-R03-OAR-2014-0884. III. Proposed Action EPA is proposing to make a determination that the Baltimore Area has attained the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. This proposed determination is based upon complete, quality-assured, and certified ambient air monitoring data that show the Baltimore Area has monitored attainment of the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the 2012-2014 monitoring period. Once this proposal is final, the requirement for this Area to submit an attainment demonstration, RACM, a RFP plan, contingency measures, and other planning requirements related to attainment of the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS shall be suspended for so long as the Baltimore Area continues to attain the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Although these requirements are suspended, EPA is not precluded from acting upon these elements at any time if submitted to EPA for review and approval. Finalizing this determination does not constitute a redesignation of the Baltimore Area to attainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS under CAA section 107(d)(3). This determination of attainment also does not involve approving any maintenance plan for the Baltimore Area and does not determine that the Baltimore Area has met all the requirements for redesignation under the CAA, including that the attainment be due to permanent and enforceable measures. Therefore, the designation status of the Baltimore Area will remain nonattainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS until such time as EPA takes final rulemaking action to determine that such Area meets the CAA requirements for redesignation to attainment. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this document. These comments will be considered before taking final action. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews This action proposes to make an attainment determination based on air quality data and would, if finalized, result in the suspension of certain Federal requirements and would not impose any additional requirements. For that reason, this proposed action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this proposed rule, concerning a determination of attainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS for the Baltimore Area, does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the State Implementation Plan (SIP) is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. [[Page 14044]] List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Incorporation by reference, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: March 6, 2015. William C. Early, Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. [FR Doc. 2015-06220 Filed 3-17-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 52 / Wednesday, March 18, 2015 / Proposed Rules 14041
paragraph (h)(5). This paragraph defines C of title I of the CAA. We note that this • is not a significant regulatory action
‘‘regulated NSR pollutant’’ for new action does not address the submitted subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
sources seeking minor permits under 18 revisions related to Alaska’s 28355, May 22, 2001);
AAC 50.502 by adopting by reference nonattainment NSR permitting program • is not subject to requirements of
the Federal definition of ‘‘regulated NSR because we approved those changes on Section 12(d) of the National
pollutant’’ at 40 CFR 52.21(b)(50). This January 7, 2015 (80 FR 832). Technology Transfer and Advancement
is not a substantive change to Alaska’s Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
IV. Incorporation by Reference
minor NSR program because this it does not involve technical standards;
definition was previously included in In this rule, the EPA is proposing to and
18 AAC 50.900. include in a final rule regulatory text • does not provide the EPA with the
that includes incorporation by discretionary authority to address, as
F. 18 AAC 50.990—Definitions reference. In accordance with appropriate, disproportionate human
The July 1, 2014, submittal revised requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is health or environmental effects, using
the definition of ‘‘fugitive emissions’’ at proposing to incorporate by reference practicable and legally permissible
18 AAC 50.990(40) to have the meaning the provisions described above in methods, under Executive Order 12898
given in 40 CFR 51.166(b)(20), as Section III. Proposed Action. The EPA (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
revised as of July 1, 2012. The October has made, and will continue to make, In addition, the SIP is not approved
24, 2014, submittal repealed the these documents generally available to apply on any Indian reservation land
definition of ‘‘regulated NSR pollutant’’ electronically through or in any other area where the EPA or
at 18 AAC 50.990(92). This action does www.regulations.gov and/or in hard an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
not address these changes because we copy at the appropriate EPA office (see tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
previously approved them on January 7, the ADDRESSES section of this preamble Indian country, the rule does not have
2015 (80 FR 832). for more information). tribal implications as specified by
The July 1, 2014, submittal also Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
updated the citation date for the V. Statutory and Executive Order
November 9, 2000), nor will it impose
incorporation by reference of the Reviews
substantial direct costs on tribal
Federal definition of ‘‘volatile organic Under the CAA, the Administrator is governments or preempt tribal law.
compound’’ (VOC). The submittal required to approve a SIP submission
revised 18 AAC 50.990(121) to define that complies with the provisions of the List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
‘‘VOC’’ as the meaning given in 40 CFR CAA and applicable Federal regulations. Environmental protection, Air
51,100(s) as of April 18, 2013. We note 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). pollution control, Incorporation by
that the Federal definition has been Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the reference, Intergovernmental relations,
revised since April 18, 2013. EPA’s role is to approve state choices, Particulate matter, Reporting and
Specifically, on October 22, 2013, the provided that they meet the criteria of recordkeeping requirements.
EPA removed constituents from the the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
definition of VOC (78 FR 62451). While action merely approves state law as
the definition in Alaska’s rule is not meeting Federal requirements and does Dated: March 6, 2015.
identical to the Federal definition, the not impose additional requirements Dennis J. McLerran,
Alaska definition is more stringent and beyond those imposed by state law. For Regional Administrator, Region 10.
therefore approvable. that reason, this proposed action: [FR Doc. 2015–06216 Filed 3–17–15; 8:45 am]
III. Proposed Action • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
action’’ subject to review by the Office
The EPA is proposing to approve and of Management and Budget under
incorporate by reference into the Alaska Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
SIP changes to the following provisions October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, AGENCY
submitted on July 1, 2014 and October January 21, 2011);
24, 2014: 40 CFR Part 52
• does not impose an information
• 18 AAC 50.015 ‘‘Air Quality collection burden under the provisions [EPA–R03–OAR–2014–0884; FRL–9924–55–
Designations, Classifications, and of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 Region 3]
Control Regions’’ (State effective 10/6/ U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
2013); Approval and Promulgation of Air
• 18 AAC 50.040 ‘‘Federal Standards • is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a Quality Implementation Plans;
Adopted by Reference’’ (State effective Maryland; Determination of Attainment
10/6/2013); substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 of the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National
• 18 AAC 50.225 ‘‘Owner-Requested Ambient Air Quality Standard for the
Limits’’ (State effective 10/6/2013); U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded Baltimore, Maryland Moderate
• 18 AAC 50.260 ‘‘Guidelines for Best Nonattainment Area
Available Retrofit Technology under the mandate or significantly or uniquely
Regional Haze Rule’’ (State effective 10/ affect small governments, as described AGENCY: Environmental Protection
6/2013); in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Agency (EPA).
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
• 18 AAC 50.502 ‘‘Minor Permits for of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); ACTION: Proposed rule.
Air Quality Protection’’ (State effective • does not have Federalism
11/9/2014); and implications as specified in Executive SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
• 18 AAC 50.990 ‘‘Definitions’’ (State Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, Agency (EPA) is proposing to make a
effective 11/9/2014). 1999); determination that the Baltimore,
We have made the preliminary • is not an economically significant Maryland Moderate Nonattainment Area
determination that the submitted SIP regulatory action based on health or (Baltimore Area) has attained the 2008
revisions are approvable because they safety risks subject to Executive Order 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air
are consistent with section 110 and part 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Quality Standard (NAAQS). This
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:03 Mar 17, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM 18MRP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_14093/page/1.svg)
![14044 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 52 / Wednesday, March 18, 2015 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 OAR–2015–0187, by one of the A. Which rules or statutory provisions did
following methods: the State submit?
Environmental protection, Air B. Are there previous versions of the
pollution control, Intergovernmental 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
statutory provisions or rules in the
relations, Incorporation by reference, www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
Arizona SIP?
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping instructions. C. What is the purpose of this proposed
requirements. 2. Email: R9airpermits@epa.gov. rule?
3. Mail or deliver: Gerardo Rios (Air- II. EPA’s Evaluation
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 3), U.S. Environmental Protection A. How is EPA evaluating the rules and
Dated: March 6, 2015. Agency, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, statutory provisions?
William C. Early, San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. Deliveries are only accepted during the for Minor New Source Review?
Regional Office’s normal hours of 1. Legally Enforceable Procedures
[FR Doc. 2015–06220 Filed 3–17–15; 8:45 am]
operation. 2. ADEQ’s Program Under 40 CFR
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 51.160(e)
Instructions: All comments will be
3. Public Availability of Information
included in the public docket without 4. Administrative Procedures
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION change and may be made available 5. Stack Height Procedures
AGENCY online at www.regulations.gov, C. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria
including any personal information for Prevention of Significant
40 CFR part 52 provided, unless the comment includes Deterioration (PSD)?
Confidential Business Information (CBI) 1. General PSD Program Requirements
[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0187; FRL–9924–48–
or other information whose disclosure is 2. Restrictions on Area Classifications
Region 9]
restricted by statute. Information that 3. Redesignations
Revisions to Air Plan; Arizona; 4. Impacts on Class I Areas
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
5. Public Participation
Stationary Sources; New Source should be clearly identified as such and 6. Plantwide Applicability Limits
Review should not be submitted through 7. Definitions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection www.regulations.gov or email. 8. PM2.5 Significant Monitoring
Agency (EPA). www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous Concentration
access’’ system, and EPA will not know 9. Definition for Basic Design Parameter
ACTION: Proposed rule. D. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of for Nonattainment New Source Review?
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
your comment. If you send email 1. General Nonattainment NSR Program
Agency (EPA) is proposing a limited Requirements
approval and limited disapproval of directly to EPA, your email address will
2. Plantwide Applicability Limits
revisions to the Arizona Department of be automatically captured and included 3. Definitions
Environmental Quality (ADEQ) portion as part of the public comment. If EPA 4. Definition for Basic Design Parameter
of the applicable state implementation cannot read your comment due to 5. Additional Provisions for Particulate
plan (SIP) for the State of Arizona. technical difficulties and cannot contact Matter Nonattainment Areas
These revisions are primarily intended you for clarification, EPA may not be E. Review of Non-NSR Related Rules and
to serve as a replacement of ADEQ’s able to consider your comment. Statutory Provisions
existing SIP-approved rules for the Electronic files should avoid the use of F. Review of Rules and Statutory
special characters, any form of Provisions Requested To Be Removed
issuance of New Source Review (NSR)
From the SIP
permits for stationary sources, including encryption, and be free of any defects or
G. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria
but not limited to review and permitting viruses. under Sections 110(l) and 193 of the Act?
of major sources and major Docket: Generally, documents in the H. Conclusion
modifications under the Clean Air Act docket for this action are available III. Public Comment and Proposed Action
(CAA or Act). After a lengthy electronically at www.regulations.gov IV. Incorporation by Reference
stakeholder process, the State of and in hard copy at EPA Region 9, 75 V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Arizona developed and submitted a Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
Definitions
NSR program for SIP approval that California. While all documents in the
satisfies most of the applicable Clean docket are listed at For the purpose of this document, we
Air Act and NSR regulatory www.regulations.gov, some information are giving meaning to certain words or
requirements, and will significantly may be publicly available only at the initials as follows:
update ADEQ’s existing SIP-approved hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted (i) The words or initials Act or CAA mean
NSR program. It also represents an material, large maps), and some may not or refer to the Clean Air Act, unless the
overall strengthening of ADEQ’s SIP- be publicly available in either location context indicates otherwise.
approved NSR program by clarifying (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy (ii) The initials ADEQ mean or refer to the
and enhancing the NSR permitting materials, please schedule an Arizona Department of Environmental
requirements for major and minor Quality.
appointment during normal business
(iii) The initials A.R.S. mean or refer to the
stationary sources. This proposed action hours with the contact listed in the FOR Arizona Revised Statutes.
will update the applicable plan and set FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. (iv) The initials BACT mean or refer to Best
the stage for remedying certain
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Available Control Technology.
deficiencies in these rules. We are Beckham, EPA Region 9, (415) 972– (v) The initials CFR mean or refer to Code
seeking comment on our proposed 3811, beckham.lisa@epa.gov. of Federal Regulations.
action and plan to follow with a final (vi) The initials CO means or refer to
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
action. carbon monoxide.
Throughout this document, the terms (vii) The words EPA, we, us or our mean
DATES: Any comments must arrive by ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. or refer to the United States Environmental
April 17, 2015. Protection Agency.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
Table of Contents
(viii) The initials FIP mean or refer to
identified by docket number EPA–R09– I. The State’s Submittals Federal Implementation Plan.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:03 Mar 17, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM 18MRP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_14093/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-21 09:39:53
Document Modified: 2018-02-21 09:39:53
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Written comments must be received on or before April 17, 2015. | |
| Contact | Irene Shandruk, (215) 814-2166, or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 14041 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Intergovernmental Relations; Incorporation by Reference; Ozone and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR