80_FR_14212 80 FR 14160 - Certain Non-Volatile Memory Chips and Products Containing the Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement

80 FR 14160 - Certain Non-Volatile Memory Chips and Products Containing the Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 52 (March 18, 2015)

Page Range14160-14161
FR Document2015-06170

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 30) granting a joint motion to terminate the above- captioned investigation based on a settlement agreement.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 52 (Wednesday, March 18, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 52 (Wednesday, March 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14160-14161]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06170]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-916]


Certain Non-Volatile Memory Chips and Products Containing the 
Same; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination 
Terminating the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 30) granting a joint motion to terminate the above-
captioned investigation based on a settlement agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clark S. Cheney, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2661. Copies of all non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission

[[Page 14161]]

may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov/. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on the matter can 
be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on June 4, 2014, based on a complaint filed by Spansion LLC 
(``Spansion''). 79 FR 32312-13 (June 4, 2014). The complaint alleged 
violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 
U.S.C. 1337), in the importation into the United States, the sale for 
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of 
certain non-volatile memory chips and products containing the same by 
reason of infringement of four U.S. patents. The notice of 
investigation named as respondents Macronix International Co., Ltd.; 
Macronix Asia Limited; Macronix (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd.; Macronix 
America, Inc. (collectively, ``Macronix''); Acer Inc.; Acer America 
Corp.; ADT-Corp.; Amazon.com, Inc.; ASRock Inc.; ASRock America, Inc.; 
ASUSTeK Computer Inc.; Asus Computer International; Belkin 
International, Inc.; D-Link Corporation; D-Link Systems, Inc.; Leap 
Motion, Inc.; Lowe's Companies, Inc.; Lowe's Home Centers, LLC (f/k/a 
Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.); Microsoft Corp.; Nintendo Co., Ltd.; 
Nintendo of America, Inc.; Sercomm Corporation; Vonage Holdings Corp.; 
Vonage America Inc.; and Vonage Marketing LLC.
    On January 29, 2015, Spansion and all respondents filed an 
unopposed motion to terminate the investigation based on a settlement 
agreement between Spansion and Macronix. On the same day, Spansion and 
Macronix filed a joint motion to limit service of their settlement 
agreement pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21(b)(1). On February 9, 
2015, Commission investigative attorney Monisha Deka (``IA'') filed a 
response in support of both motions.
    On February 18, 2015, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting both 
motions and terminating the investigation. The ALJ noted the parties' 
assertion that the settlement agreement between Spansion and Macronix 
fully resolves the investigation with respect to all respondents and 
that there are no other agreements between the parties concerning the 
subject matter of this investigation. The ALJ further found no evidence 
that termination based on the settlement agreement would impose any 
undue burdens on public health and welfare, competitive conditions in 
the U.S. economy, the production of like or directly competitive 
articles in the United States, or U.S. consumers. To the contrary, the 
ALJ found that termination is in the public interest because it would 
avoid needless litigation and conserve public resources.
    The ALJ found that Spansion and Macronix filed a confidential and 
public version of the settlement agreement in compliance with 
Commission Rule 210.21(b). The ALJ additionally found that because the 
settlement agreement at issue is confidential between Spansion and 
Macronix, there was good cause to limit service of that agreement to 
Spansion, the Macronix respondents, and the IA. No petitions for review 
of the ID were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: March 12, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-06170 Filed 3-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P



                                                  14160                       Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 52 / Wednesday, March 18, 2015 / Notices

                                                  International Trade Commission, on                      covering the other issues of the                      notice of investigation. Extensions of
                                                  March 11, 2015, ordered that —                          investigation.                                        time for submitting responses to the
                                                     (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of                      (4) For the purpose of the                          complaint and the notice of
                                                  section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as               investigation so instituted, the following            investigation will not be granted unless
                                                  amended, an investigation be instituted                 are hereby named as parties upon which                good cause therefor is shown.
                                                  to determine whether there is a                         this notice of investigation shall be                    Failure of a respondent to file a timely
                                                  violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of                    served:                                               response to each allegation in the
                                                  section 337 in the importation into the                   (a) The complainant is:                             complaint and in this notice may be
                                                  United States, the sale for importation,                Andrea Electronics Corp., 65 Orville                  deemed to constitute a waiver of the
                                                  or the sale within the United States after                   Drive, Suite One, Bohemia, NY                    right to appear and contest the
                                                  importation of certain audio processing                      11716.                                           allegations of the complaint and this
                                                  hardware and software and products                        (b) The respondents are the following               notice, and to authorize the
                                                  containing same by reason of                            entities alleged to be in violation of                administrative law judge and the
                                                  infringement of one or more of claims                   section 337, and are the parties upon                 Commission, without further notice to
                                                  1–28 of the ’898 patent; claims 1–16 of                 which the complaint is to be served:                  the respondent, to find the facts to be as
                                                  the ’923 patent; claims 1–12 and 25–37                  Acer Inc., 8F, 88, Sec. 1, Xintai 5th Rd.             alleged in the complaint and this notice
                                                  of the ’607 patent; claims 1–25, 38–40,                      Xixhi, New Taipei City 221, Taiwan               and to enter an initial determination
                                                  and 42–47 of the ’345 patent; and claims                Acer America Corp., 333 West San                      and a final determination containing
                                                  1–14 of the ’637 patent, and whether an                      Carlos Street, Suite 1500, San Jose,             such findings, and may result in the
                                                  industry in the United States exists as                      CA 95110                                         issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
                                                  required by subsection (a)(2) of section                ASUSTeK Computer Inc., No. 15, Li-Te                  and desist order or both directed against
                                                  337;                                                         Rd., Beitou District, Taipei 112,                the respondent.
                                                     (2) Pursuant to Commission Rule                           Taiwan                                             By order of the Commission.
                                                                                                          ASUS Computer International, 800
                                                  210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the                                                                          Issued: March 12, 2015.
                                                                                                               Corporate Way, Fremont, CA 94539
                                                  presiding administrative law judge shall                                                                      Lisa R. Barton,
                                                                                                          Dell Inc., One Dell Way, Round Rock,
                                                  take evidence or other information and                                                                        Secretary to the Commission.
                                                                                                               TX 78682
                                                  hear arguments from the parties and
                                                                                                          Hewlett Packard Co., 3000 Hanover                     [FR Doc. 2015–06081 Filed 3–17–15; 8:45 am]
                                                  other interested persons with respect to
                                                                                                               Street, Palo Alto, CA 94304–1185                 BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
                                                  the public interest in this investigation,              Lenovo Group Ltd., Shangdi
                                                  as appropriate, and provide the                              Information Industry Base, No 6
                                                  Commission with findings of fact and a                       Chuang Ye Road, Haidan District,                 INTERNATIONAL TRADE
                                                  recommended determination on this                            100085 Beijing, China                            COMMISSION
                                                  issue, which shall be limited to the                    Lenovo Holding Co., Inc., 1009 Think
                                                  statutory public interest factors, 19                                                                         [Investigation No. 337–TA–916]
                                                                                                               Place, Morrisville, NC 27650
                                                  U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1);                      Lenovo (United States) Inc., 1009 Think               Certain Non-Volatile Memory Chips
                                                     (3) Notwithstanding any Commission                        Place, Morrisville, NC 27650                     and Products Containing the Same;
                                                  Rules that would otherwise apply, the                   Toshiba Corp., 1–1, Shibaura 1-chome,                 Commission Determination Not To
                                                  presiding Administrative Law Judge                           Toshiba Building, Minato-Ku,                     Review an Initial Determination
                                                  shall hold an early evidentiary hearing,                     Tokyo 105–8001, Japan                            Terminating the Investigation Based
                                                  find facts, and issue an early decision,                Toshiba America, Inc., 1251 Avenue of                 on a Settlement Agreement
                                                  as to whether the complainant has                            the Americas, Suite 4110, New
                                                  standing to assert each of the asserted                      York, NY 10020                                   AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
                                                  patents. Any such decision shall be in                  Toshiba America Information Systems,                  Commission.
                                                  the form of an initial determination (ID).                   Inc., 9740 Irvine Boulevard, Irvine,             ACTION: Notice.
                                                  Petitions for review of such an ID shall                     CA 92618
                                                  be due five calendar days after service                 Realtek Semiconductor Corp., No. 2,                   SUMMARY:   Notice is hereby given that
                                                  of the ID; any replies shall be due three                    Innovation Road II, Hsinchu                      the U.S. International Trade
                                                  business days after service of a petition.                   Science Park, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan                Commission has determined not to
                                                  The ID will become the Commission’s                       (c) The Office of Unfair Import                     review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
                                                  final determination 30 days after the                   Investigations, U.S. International Trade              (Order No. 30) granting a joint motion
                                                  date of service of the ID unless the                    Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite                   to terminate the above-captioned
                                                  Commission determines to review the                     401, Washington, DC 20436; and                        investigation based on a settlement
                                                  ID. Any such review will be conducted                     (5) For the investigation so instituted,            agreement.
                                                  in accordance with Commission Rules                     the Chief Administrative Law Judge,                   FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                  210.43, 210.44, and 210.45, 19 CFR                      U.S. International Trade Commission,                  Clark S. Cheney, Office of the General
                                                  210.43, 210.44, and 210.45. The                         shall designate the presiding                         Counsel, U.S. International Trade
                                                  Commission expects the issuance of an                   Administrative Law Judge.                             Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
                                                  early ID relating to the standing issues                  Responses to the complaint and the                  Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
                                                  within 100 days of institution, except                  notice of investigation must be                       205–2661. Copies of all non-confidential
                                                  that the presiding ALJ may grant a                      submitted by the named respondents in                 documents filed in connection with this
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  limited extension of the ID for good                    accordance with section 210.13 of the                 investigation are or will be available for
                                                  cause shown. The issuance of an early                   Commission’s Rules of Practice and                    inspection during official business
                                                  ID finding complainant does not have                    Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to                 hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
                                                  standing to assert the asserted patents                 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such                  Office of the Secretary, U.S.
                                                  shall stay the investigation unless the                 responses will be considered by the                   International Trade Commission, 500 E
                                                  Commission orders otherwise; any other                  Commission if received not later than 20              Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
                                                  decision shall not stay the investigation               days after the date of service by the                 telephone 202–205–2000. General
                                                  or delay the issuance of a final ID                     Commission of the complaint and the                   information concerning the Commission


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:00 Mar 17, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00091   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM   18MRN1


                                                                              Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 52 / Wednesday, March 18, 2015 / Notices                                              14161

                                                  may also be obtained by accessing its                   settlement agreement would impose any                 respondents. The ALJ rejected the
                                                  Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov).                 undue burdens on public health and                    respondents’ arguments that the public
                                                  The public record for this investigation                welfare, competitive conditions in the                interest stands in the way of relief for
                                                  may be viewed on the Commission’s                       U.S. economy, the production of like or               the complainants. This notice is
                                                  electronic docket (EDIS) at http://                     directly competitive articles in the                  soliciting public interest comments from
                                                  edis.usitc.gov/. Hearing-impaired                       United States, or U.S. consumers. To the              the public only. Parties are to file public
                                                  persons are advised that information on                 contrary, the ALJ found that termination              interest submissions pursuant to 19 CFR
                                                  the matter can be obtained by contacting                is in the public interest because it                  210.50(a)(4).
                                                  the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–                   would avoid needless litigation and                   FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                  205–1810.                                               conserve public resources.                            Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the
                                                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The                             The ALJ found that Spansion and                    General Counsel, U.S. International
                                                  Commission instituted this investigation                Macronix filed a confidential and public              Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
                                                  on June 4, 2014, based on a complaint                   version of the settlement agreement in                Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
                                                  filed by Spansion LLC (‘‘Spansion’’). 79                compliance with Commission Rule                       708–2532. Copies of non-confidential
                                                  FR 32312–13 (June 4, 2014). The                         210.21(b). The ALJ additionally found                 documents filed in connection with this
                                                  complaint alleged violations of section                 that because the settlement agreement at              investigation are or will be available for
                                                  337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as                       issue is confidential between Spansion                inspection during official business
                                                  amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the                        and Macronix, there was good cause to                 hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
                                                  importation into the United States, the                 limit service of that agreement to                    Office of the Secretary, U.S.
                                                  sale for importation, and the sale within               Spansion, the Macronix respondents,                   International Trade Commission, 500 E
                                                  the United States after importation of                  and the IA. No petitions for review of                Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
                                                  certain non-volatile memory chips and                   the ID were filed.                                    telephone (202) 205–2000. General
                                                  products containing the same by reason                     The Commission has determined not                  information concerning the Commission
                                                  of infringement of four U.S. patents. The               to review the ID.                                     may also be obtained by accessing its
                                                  notice of investigation named as                           The authority for the Commission’s                 Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov.
                                                  respondents Macronix International Co.,                 determination is contained in section                 The public record for this investigation
                                                  Ltd.; Macronix Asia Limited; Macronix                   337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as                     may be viewed on the Commission’s
                                                  (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd.; Macronix                         amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part                 electronic docket (EDIS) at http://
                                                  America, Inc. (collectively,                            210 of the Commission’s Rules of                      edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
                                                  ‘‘Macronix’’); Acer Inc.; Acer America                  Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part                   persons are advised that information on
                                                  Corp.; ADT-Corp.; Amazon.com, Inc.;                     210).                                                 this matter can be obtained by
                                                  ASRock Inc.; ASRock America, Inc.;                        By order of the Commission.                         contacting the Commission’s TDD
                                                  ASUSTeK Computer Inc.; Asus                               Issued: March 12, 2015.                             terminal on (202) 205–1810.
                                                  Computer International; Belkin                          Lisa R. Barton,                                       SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
                                                  International, Inc.; D-Link Corporation;                Secretary to the Commission.                          337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 provides
                                                  D-Link Systems, Inc.; Leap Motion, Inc.;                [FR Doc. 2015–06170 Filed 3–17–15; 8:45 am]           that if the Commission finds a violation
                                                  Lowe’s Companies, Inc.; Lowe’s Home                                                                           it shall exclude the articles concerned
                                                                                                          BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
                                                  Centers, LLC (f/k/a Lowe’s Home                                                                               from the United States:
                                                  Centers, Inc.); Microsoft Corp.; Nintendo                                                                     unless, after considering the effect of such
                                                  Co., Ltd.; Nintendo of America, Inc.;                   INTERNATIONAL TRADE                                   exclusion upon the public health and
                                                  Sercomm Corporation; Vonage Holdings                    COMMISSION                                            welfare, competitive conditions in the United
                                                  Corp.; Vonage America Inc.; and Vonage                                                                        States economy, the production of like or
                                                  Marketing LLC.                                          [Investigation No. 337–TA–910]                        directly competitive articles in the United
                                                     On January 29, 2015, Spansion and all                                                                      States, and United States consumers, it finds
                                                  respondents filed an unopposed motion                   Certain Television Sets, Television                   that such articles should not be excluded
                                                  to terminate the investigation based on                 Receivers, Television Tuners, and                     from entry.
                                                  a settlement agreement between                          Components Thereof, Capabilities and
                                                                                                                                                                19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1). A similar
                                                  Spansion and Macronix. On the same                      Components Thereof; Request for
                                                                                                                                                                provision applies to cease and desist
                                                  day, Spansion and Macronix filed a                      Statements on the Public Interest
                                                                                                                                                                orders. 19 U.S.C. 1337(f)(1).
                                                  joint motion to limit service of their                  AGENCY: U.S. International Trade                         The Commission is interested in
                                                  settlement agreement pursuant to                        Commission.                                           further development of the record on
                                                  Commission Rule 210.21(b)(1). On                        ACTION: Notice.                                       the public interest in these
                                                  February 9, 2015, Commission                                                                                  investigations. Accordingly, members of
                                                  investigative attorney Monisha Deka                     SUMMARY:   Notice is hereby given that                the public are invited to file
                                                  (‘‘IA’’) filed a response in support of                 the presiding administrative law judge                submissions of no more than five (5)
                                                  both motions.                                           has issued a Final Initial Determination              pages, inclusive of attachments,
                                                     On February 18, 2015, the ALJ issued                 on Violation of Section 337 and                       concerning the public interest in light of
                                                  the subject ID granting both motions and                Recommended Determination on                          the administrative law judge’s
                                                  terminating the investigation. The ALJ                  Remedy and Bond in the above-                         Recommended Determination on
                                                  noted the parties’ assertion that the                   captioned investigation. The                          Remedy and Bond issued in this
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  settlement agreement between Spansion                   Commission is soliciting comments                     investigation on February 27, 2015.
                                                  and Macronix fully resolves the                         from the public on public interest issues             Comments should address whether
                                                  investigation with respect to all                       raised by the recommended relief,                     issuance of a limited exclusion order
                                                  respondents and that there are no other                 specifically that if the Commission were              and/or cease and desist orders in this
                                                  agreements between the parties                          to find a violation of section 337, 19                investigation would affect the public
                                                  concerning the subject matter of this                   U.S.C. 1337, that the Commission issue                health and welfare in the United States,
                                                  investigation. The ALJ further found no                 limited exclusion orders and cease and                competitive conditions in the United
                                                  evidence that termination based on the                  desist orders directed to the                         States economy, the production of like


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:00 Mar 17, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00092   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM   18MRN1



Document Created: 2018-02-21 09:39:46
Document Modified: 2018-02-21 09:39:46
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
ContactClark S. Cheney, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2661. Copies of all non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov/. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on the matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205- 1810.
FR Citation80 FR 14160 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR