80 FR 14392 - Office of Direct Service and Contracting Tribes; Tribal Management Grant Program
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Indian Health Service Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 53 (March 19, 2015)
Indian Health Service
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 53 (March 19, 2015)
| Page Range | 14392-14401 | |
| FR Document | 2015-06353 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 53 (Thursday, March 19, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 14392-14401] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-06353] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Indian Health Service Office of Direct Service and Contracting Tribes; Tribal Management Grant Program Announcement Type: New and Competing Continuation. Funding Announcement Number: HHS-2015-IHS-TMD-0001. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 93.228. Key Dates Application Deadline Date: June 3, 2015. Review Date: June 22-26, 2015. Earliest Anticipated Start Date: September 1, 2015. Signed Tribal Resolutions Due Date: June 19, 2015. Proof of Non-Profit Status Due Date: June 3, 2015. I. Funding Opportunity Description Statutory Authority The Indian Health Service (IHS) is accepting competitive grant applications for the Tribal Management Grant (TMG) program. This program is authorized under 25 U.S.C. 450h(b)(2) and 25 U.S.C. 450h(e) of the Indian Health Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA), Public Law (Pub. L.) 93-638, as amended. This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) under 93.228. [[Page 14393]] Background The TMG Program is a competitive grant program that is capacity building and developmental in nature and has been available for Federally-recognized Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations (T/TO) since shortly after the passage of the ISDEAA in 1975. It was established to assist T/TO to assume all or part of existing IHS programs, functions, services, and activities (PFSA) and further develop and improve their health management capability. The TMG Program provides competitive grants to T/TO to establish goals and performance measures for current health programs; assess current management capacity to determine if new components are appropriate; analyze programs to determine if T/TO management is practicable; and develop infrastructure systems to manage or organize PFSA. Purpose The purpose of this IHS grant announcement is to announce the availability of the TMG Program to enhance and develop health management infrastructure and assist T/TO in assuming all or part of existing IHS PSFA through a Title I contract and assist established Title I contractors and Title V compactors to further develop and improve their management capability. In addition, TMGs are available to T/TO under the authority of 25 U.S.C. 450h(e) for: (1) Obtaining technical assistance from providers designated by the T/TO (including T/TO that operate mature contracts) for the purposes of program planning and evaluation, including the development of any management systems necessary for contract management and the development of cost allocation plans for indirect cost rates; and (2) planning, designing, monitoring, and evaluation of Federal programs serving the T/TO, including Federal administrative functions. II. Award Information Type of Award Grant. Estimated Funds Available The total amount of funding identified for the current fiscal year (FY) 2015 is approximately $2,412,000. Individual award amounts are anticipated to be between $50,000 and $100,000. The amount of funding available for competing and continuation awards issued under this announcement is subject to the availability of appropriations and budgetary priorities of the Agency. The IHS is under no obligation to make awards that are selected for funding under this announcement. Anticipated Number of Awards Approximately 16-18 awards will be issued under this program announcement. Project Period The project periods vary based on the project type selected. Project periods could run from one, two, or three years and will run consecutively from the earliest anticipated start date of September 1, 2015 through August 31, 2016 for one year projects; September 1, 2015 through August 31, 2017 for two year projects; and September 1, 2015 through August 31, 2018 for three year projects. Please refer to ``Eligible TMG Project Types, Maximum Funding Levels and Project Periods'' below for additional details. State the number of years for the project period and include the exact dates. III. Eligibility Information 1. Eligibility Eligible Applicants: ``Indian Tribes'' and ``Tribal organizations'' (T/TO) as defined by the ISDEAA are eligible to apply for the TMG Program. The definitions for each entity type are outlined below. Only one application per T/TO is allowed. Definitions: ``Indian Tribe'' means any Indian tribe, band, nation, or other organized group or community, including any Alaska Native village or regional or village corporation as defined in or established pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (85 Stat. 688) [43 U.S.C. Sec. 1601 et seq.], which is recognized as eligible for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians. 25 U.S.C. Sec. 450b(e). ``Tribal organization'' means the recognized governing body of any Indian tribe; any legally established organization of Indians which is controlled, sanctioned, or chartered by such governing body or which is democratically elected by the adult members of the Indian community to be served by such organization and which includes the maximum participation of Indians in all phases of its activities. 25 U.S.C. Sec. 450b(l). Tribal organizations must provide proof of non-profit status. Eligible TMG Project Types, Maximum Funding Levels and Project Periods: The TMG Program consists of four project types: (1) Feasibility study; (2) planning; (3) evaluation study; and (4) health management structure. Applicants may submit applications for one project type only. Applicants must state the project type selected. Applications that address more than one project type will be considered ineligible. The maximum funding levels noted include both direct and indirect costs. Applicant budgets may not exceed the maximum funding level or project period identified for a project type. Applicants whose budget or project period exceed the maximum funding level or project period will be deemed ineligible and will not be reviewed. Please refer to Section IV.5, ``Funding Restrictions'' for further information regarding ineligible project activities. 1. FEASIBILITY STUDY (Maximum funding/project period: $70,000/12 months) The Feasibility Study must include a study of a specific IHS program or segment of a program to determine if Tribal management of the program is possible. The study shall present the planned approach, training, and resources required to assume Tribal management of the program. The study must include the following four components:Health needs and health care services assessments that identify existing health care services and delivery systems, program divisibility issues, health status indicators, unmet needs, volume projections, and demand analysis. Management analysis of existing management structures, proposed management structures, implementation plans and requirements, and personnel staffing requirements and recruitment barriers. Financial analysis of historical trends data, financial projections and new resource requirements for program management costs and analysis of potential revenues from Federal/non-Federal sources. Decision statement/report that incorporates findings, conclusions and recommendations; the presentation of the study and recommendations to the Tribal governing body for determination regarding whether Tribal assumption of program(s) is desirable or warranted. 2. PLANNING (Maximum funding/project period: $50,000/12 months) Planning projects entail a collection of data to establish goals and performance measures for the operation of current health programs or anticipated PFSA under a Title I contract. Planning projects will specify the design of health programs and the management systems (including appropriate policies and procedures) to accomplish the health [[Page 14394]] priorities of the T/TO. For example, planning projects could include the development of a Tribal Specific Health Plan or a Strategic Health Plan, etc. Please note that updated Healthy People information and Healthy People 2020 objectives are available in electronic format at the following Web site: http://www.health.gov/healthypeople/publications. The Public Health Service (PHS) encourages applicants submitting strategic health plans to address specific objectives of Healthy People 2020. 3. EVALUATION STUDY (Maximum funding/project period: $50,000/12 months) The Evaluation Study must include a systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of data for the purpose of determining the value of a program. The extent of the evaluation study could relate to the goals and objectives, policies and procedures, or programs regarding targeted groups. The evaluation study could also be used to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of a Tribal program operation (i.e., direct services, financial management, personnel, data collection and analysis, third-party billing, etc.), as well as to determine the appropriateness of new components of a Tribal program operation that will assist Tribal efforts to improve their health care delivery systems. 4. HEALTH MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE (Average funding/project period: $100,000/12 months; maximum funding/project period: $300,000/36 months) The first year maximum funding level is limited to $150,000 for multi-year projects. The Health Management Structure component allows for implementation of systems to manage or organize PFSA. Management structures include health department organizations, health boards, and financial management systems, including systems for accounting, personnel, third-party billing, medical records, management information systems, etc. This includes the design, improvement, and correction of management systems that address weaknesses identified through quality control measures, internal control reviews, and audit report findings under required financial audits and ISDEAA requirements. For the minimum standards for the management systems used by Indian T/TO when carrying out self-determination contracts, please see 25 CFR part 900, Contracts Under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, Subpart F--``Standards for Tribal or Tribal Organization Management Systems,'' Sec. Sec. 900.35-900.60. For operational provisions applicable to carrying out Self-Governance compacts, please see 42 CFR part 137, Tribal Self-Governance, Subpart I,--``Operational Provisions'' Sec. Sec. 137.160-137.220. Please see Section IV ``Application and Submission Information'' for information on how to obtain a copy of the TMG application package. To be eligible for this ``New/Competing Continuation Announcement,'' an applicant must be one of the following as defined by 25 U.S.C. 450b: i. An Indian Tribe, as defined by 25 U.S.C. 450b(e); or ii. A Tribal organization, as defined by 25 U.S.C. 450b(l). Note: Please refer to Section IV.2 (Application and Submission Information/Subsection 2, Content and Form of Application Submission) for additional proof of applicant status documents required such as Tribal resolutions, proof of non-profit status, etc. 2. Cost Sharing or Matching The IHS does not require matching funds or cost sharing for grants or cooperative agreements. 3. Other Requirements If application budgets exceed the highest dollar amount outlined under the ``Estimated Funds Available'' section within this funding announcement, the application will be considered ineligible and will not be reviewed for further consideration. If deemed ineligible, IHS will not return the application. The applicant will be notified by email by the Division of Grants Management (DGM) of this decision. The following documentation is required: Tribal Resolution A. Signed Tribal Resolution--A signed Tribal resolution of the Indian Tribes served by the project must accompany the electronic application submission. An Indian Tribe or Tribal organization that is proposing a project affecting another Indian Tribe must include resolutions from all affected Tribes to be served. Applications by Tribal organizations will not require a specific Tribal resolution if the current Tribal resolution(s) under which they operate would encompass the proposed grant activities. Draft Tribal resolutions are acceptable in lieu of an official signed resolution and must be submitted along with the electronic application submission prior to the official application deadline date or prior to the start of the Objective Review Committee (ORC) date. However, an official signed Tribal resolution must be received by the DGM prior to the beginning of the Objective Review. If an official signed resolution is not received by the Review Date listed under the Key Dates section on page one of this announcement, the application will be considered incomplete and ineligible. B. The official signed resolution can be mailed to the DGM, Attn: Mr. Pallop Chareonvootitam, Grants Management Specialist (GMS), 801 Thompson Avenue, TMP Suite 360, Rockville, MD 20852. Applicants submitting Tribal resolutions after or aside from the required online electronic application submission must ensure that the information is received by the IHS/DGM. It is highly recommended that the documentation be sent by a delivery method that includes delivery confirmation and tracking. Please contact Mr. Pallop Chareonvootitam, GMS, by telephone at (301) 443-5204 prior to the review date regarding submission questions. C. Tribal organizations applying for technical assistance and/or training grants must submit documentation that the Tribal organization is applying upon the request of the Indian Tribe/Tribes it intends to serve. D. Documentation for Priority I participation requires a copy of the Federal Register notice or letter from the Bureau of Indian Affairs verifying establishment of Federally-recognized Tribal status within the last five years. The date on the documentation must reflect that Federal recognition was received during or after March 2010. E. Documentation for Priority II participation requires a copy of the most current transmittal letter and Attachment A from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of Inspector General (OIG), National External Audit Review Center (NEAR). See ``FUNDING PRIORITIES'' below for more information. If an applicant is unable to locate a copy of the most recent transmittal letter or needs assistance with audit issues, information or technical assistance may be obtained by contacting the IHS, Office of Finance and Accounting, Division of Audit at (301) 443-1270, or the NEAR help line at (800) 732-0679 or (816) 426-7720. Federally-recognized Indian Tribes or Tribal organizations not subject to Single Audit Act requirements must provide a financial statement identifying the Federal dollars in the footnotes. The financial statement must also identify specific weaknesses/recommendations that will be addressed in the TMG proposal and that are [[Page 14395]] related to 25 CFR part 900, subpart F--``Standards for Tribal and Tribal Organization Management Systems.'' F. Documentation of Consortium participation--If an Indian Tribe submitting an application is a member of an eligible intertribal consortium, the Tribe must: --Identify the consortium. --Indicate if the consortium intends to submit a TMG application. --Demonstrate that the Tribe's application does not duplicate or overlap any objectives of the consortium's application. --Identify all consortium member Tribes. --Identify if any of the member Tribes intend to submit a TMG application of their own. --Demonstrate that the consortium's application does not duplicate or overlap any objectives of the other consortium members who may be submitting their own TMG application. FUNDING PRIORITIES: The IHS has established the following funding priorities for TMG awards: PRIORITY I--Any Indian Tribe that has received Federal recognition (including restored, funded, or unfunded) within the past five years, specifically received during or after March 2009, will be considered Priority I. PRIORITY II--Federally-recognized Indian Tribes or Tribal organizations submitting a competing continuation application or a new application for the sole purpose of addressing audit material weaknesses will be considered Priority II. Priority II participation is only applicable to the Health Management Structure project type. For more information, see ``Eligible TMG Project Types, Maximum Funding Levels and Project Periods'' in Section II. PRIORITY III--Eligible Direct Service and Title I Federally-recognized Indian Tribes or Tribal organizations submitting a competing continuation application or a new application will be considered Priority III. PRIORITY IV--Eligible Title V Self Governance Federally- recognized Indian Tribes or Tribal organizations submitting a competing continuation or a new application will be considered Priority IV. The funding of approved Priority I applicants will occur before the funding of approved Priority II applicants. Priority II applicants will be funded before approved Priority III applicants. Priority III applicants will be funded before Priority IV applicants. Funds will be distributed until depleted. The following definitions are applicable to the PRIORITY II category: Audit finding means deficiencies which the auditor is required by 45 CFR 75.516, to report in the schedule of findings and questioned costs. Material weakness--``Statements on Auditing Standards 115'' defines material weakness as a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. Significant deficiency--Statements on Auditing Standards 115 defines significant deficiency as a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. The audit findings are identified in Attachment A of the transmittal letter received from the HHS/OIG/NEAR. Please identify the material weaknesses to be addressed by underlining the item(s) listed on the Attachment A. Federally-recognized Indian Tribes or Tribal organizations not subject to Single Audit Act requirements must provide a financial statement identifying the Federal dollars received in the footnotes. The financial statement should also identify specific weaknesses/ recommendations that will be addressed in the TMG proposal and that are related to 25 CFR part 900, subpart F--``Standards for Tribal and Tribal Organization Management Systems.'' Proof of Non-Profit Status Organizations claiming non-profit status must submit proof. A copy of the 501(c)(3) Certificate must be received with the application submission by the Application Deadline Date listed under the Key Dates section on page one of this announcement. An applicant submitting any of the above additional documentation after the initial application submission due date is required to ensure the information was received by the IHS by obtaining documentation confirming delivery (i.e. FedEx tracking, postal return receipt, etc.). IV. Application and Submission Information 1. Obtaining Application Materials The application package and detailed instructions for this announcement can be found at http://www.Grants.gov or https://www.ihs.gov/dgm/index.cfm?module=dsp_dgm_funding Questions regarding the electronic application process may be directed to Mr. Paul Gettys at (301) 443-2114. 2. Content and Form Application Submission The applicant must include the project narrative as an attachment to the application package. Mandatory documents for all applicants include: Table of contents. Abstract (one page) summarizing the project. Application forms: [cir] SF-424, Application for Federal Assistance. [cir] SF-424A, Budget Information--Non-Construction Programs. [cir] SF-424B, Assurances--Non-Construction Programs. Budget Justification and Narrative (must be single spaced and not exceed five pages). Project Narrative (must be single spaced and not exceed 15 pages). [cir] Background information on the organization. [cir] Proposed scope of work, objectives, and activities that provide a description of what will be accomplished, including a one- page Timeframe Chart. Tribal Resolution. (Submission of either a final signed resolution or a draft resolution with the initial application is mandatory. If submitting a draft resolution, it is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the final signed resolution is submitted prior to the objective review of applications date.) 501(c)(3) Certificate (if applicable). Position Descriptions for Key Personnel. Contractor/Consultant resumes or qualifications and scope of work. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL). Certification Regarding Lobbying (GG-Lobbying Form). Copy of current Negotiated Indirect Cost rate (IDC) agreement (required) in order to receive IDC. Organizational Chart (optional). Documentation of current required Financial Audit (if applicable). Acceptable forms of documentation include: [cir] Email confirmation from Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) that audits were submitted; or [cir] Face sheets from audit reports. These can be found on the FAC Web site: http://harvester.census.gov/sac/dissem/accessoptions.html?submit=Go+To+Database. Public Policy Requirements All Federal-wide public policies apply to IHS grants and cooperative [[Page 14396]] agreements with exception of the Discrimination policy. Requirements for Project and Budget Narratives A. Project Narrative: This narrative should be a separate Word document that is no longer than 15 pages and must: be single-spaced, be type written, have consecutively numbered pages, use black type not smaller than 12 characters per one inch, and be printed on one side only of standard size 8\1/2\'' x 11'' paper. Be sure to succinctly address and answer all questions listed under the narrative and place them under the evaluation criteria (refer to Section V.1, Evaluation criteria in this announcement) and place all responses and required information in the correct section (noted below), or they shall not be considered or scored. These narratives will assist the ORC in becoming familiar with the applicant's activities and accomplishments prior to this grant award. If the narrative exceeds the page limit, only the first 15 pages will be reviewed. The 15-page limit for the narrative does not include the work plan, standard forms, Tribal resolutions, table of contents, budget, budget justifications, narratives, and/or other appendix items. There are three parts to the narrative: Part A--Program Information; Part B--Program Planning and Evaluation; and Part C-- Program Report. See below for additional details about what must be included in the narrative. Part A: Program Information (2 page limitation) Section 1: Needs Describe how the T/TO has determined the need to either enhance or develop its management capability to either assume PFSAs or not in the interest of self-determination. Note the progression of previous TMG projects/awards if applicable. Part B: Program Planning and Evaluation (11 page limitation) Section 1: Program Plans Describe fully and clearly the direction the T/TO plans to take with the selected TMG project type in addressing their health management infrastructure including how the T/TO plans to demonstrate improved health and services to the community or communities it serves. Include proposed timelines. Section 2: Program Evaluation Describe fully and clearly the improvements that will be made by the T/TO that will impact their management capability or prepare them for future improvements to their organization that will allow them to manage their health care system and identify the anticipated or expected benefits for the Tribe. Part C: Program Report (2 page limitation) Section 1: Describe major accomplishments over the last 24 months. Please identify and describe significant program achievements associated with the delivery of quality health services. Provide a comparison of the actual accomplishments to the goals established for the project period, or if applicable, provide justification for the lack of progress. Section 2: Describe major activities over the last 24 months. Please identify and summarize recent major health related project activities of the work done during the project period. B. Budget Narrative: This narrative must include a line item budget with a narrative justification for all expenditures identifying reasonable and allowable costs necessary to accomplish the goals and objectives as outlined in the project narrative. Budget should match the scope of work described in the project narrative. The page limitation should not exceed five pages. 3. Submission Dates and Times Applications must be submitted electronically through Grants.gov by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST) on the Application Deadline Date listed in the Key Dates section on page one of this announcement. Any application received after the application deadline will not be accepted for processing, nor will it be given further consideration for funding. Grants.gov will notify the applicant via email if the application is rejected. If technical challenges arise and assistance is required with the electronic application process, contact Grants.gov Customer Support via email to [email protected] or at (800) 518-4726. Customer Support is available to address questions 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (except on Federal holidays). If problems persist, contact Mr. Paul Gettys, DGM ([email protected]) at (301) 443-2114. Please be sure to contact Mr. Gettys at least ten days prior to the application deadline. Please do not contact the DGM until you have received a Grants.gov tracking number. In the event you are not able to obtain a tracking number, call the DGM as soon as possible. If the applicant needs to submit a paper application instead of submitting electronically through Grants.gov, a waiver must be requested. Prior approval must be requested and obtained from Ms. Tammy Bagley, Acting Director of DGM, (see Section IV.6 below for additional information). The waiver must: (1) Be documented in writing (emails are acceptable), before submitting a paper application, and (2) include clear justification for the need to deviate from the required electronic grants submission process. A written waiver request must be sent to [email protected] with a copy to [email protected]. Once the waiver request has been approved, the applicant will receive a confirmation of approval email containing submission instructions and the mailing address to submit the application. A copy of the written approval must be submitted along with the hardcopy of the application that is mailed to DGM. Paper applications that are submitted without a copy of the signed waiver from the Acting Director of the DGM will not be reviewed or considered for funding. The applicant will be notified via email of this decision by the Grants Management Officer of the DGM. Paper applications must be received by the DGM no later than 5:00 p.m., EST, on the Application Deadline Date listed in the Key Dates section on page one of this announcement. Late applications will not be accepted for processing or considered for funding. 4. Intergovernmental Review Executive Order 12372 requiring intergovernmental review is not applicable to this program. 5. Funding Restrictions Pre-award costs are not allowable. The available funds are inclusive of direct and appropriate indirect costs. Only one grant will be awarded per applicant. IHS will not acknowledge receipt of applications. The TMG may not be used to support recurring operational programs or to replace existing public and private resources. Funding received under a recurring Public Law 93-638 contract cannot be totally supplanted or totally replaced. Exception is allowed to charge a portion or percentage of salaries of existing staff positions involved in implementing the TMG grant, if applicable. However, this percentage of TMG funding must reflect supplementation of funding for the project and not supplantation of existing ISDEAA contract funds. Supplementation is ``adding to a program'' whereas supplantation is ``taking the place of'' funds. An entity cannot use the TMG funds to supplant [[Page 14397]] the ISDEAA contract or recurring funding. Ineligible Project Activities--The inclusion of the following projects or activities in an application will render the application ineligible. [cir] Planning and negotiating activities associated with the intent of a Tribe to enter the IHS Self-Governance Project. A separate grant program is administered by the IHS for this purpose. Prospective applicants interested in this program should contact Mr. Jeremy Marshall, Policy Analyst, Office of Tribal Self-Governance, Indian Health Service, Reyes Building, 801 Thompson Avenue, Suite 240, Rockville, Maryland 20852, (301) 443-7821, and request information concerning the ``Tribal Self-Governance Program Planning Cooperative Agreement Announcement'' or the ``Negotiation Cooperative Agreement Announcement.'' [cir] Projects related to water, sanitation, and waste management. [cir] Projects that include direct patient care and/or equipment to provide those medical services to be used to establish or augment or continue direct patient clinical care. Medical equipment that is allowable under the Special Diabetes Grant Program is not allowable under the TMG Program. [cir] Projects that include recruitment efforts for direct patient care services. [cir] Projects that include long-term care or provision of any direct services. [cir] Projects that include tuition, fees, or stipends for certification or training of staff to provide direct services. [cir] Projects that include pre-planning, design, and planning of construction for facilities, including activities relating to program justification documents. [cir] Projects that propose more than one project type. Refer to Section II, ``Award Information,'' specifically ``Eligible TMG Project Types, Maximum Funding Levels and Project Periods'' for more information. An example of a proposal with more than one project type that would be considered ineligible may include the creation of a strategic health plan (defined by TMG as a planning project type) and improving third-party billing structures (defined by TMG as a health management structure project type). Multi-year applications that include in the first year planning, evaluation, or feasibility activities with the remainder of the project years addressing management structure are also deemed ineligible. [cir] Any Alaska Native Village that is neither a Title I nor a Title V organization and does not have the legal authority to contract services under 450(b) of the ISDEAA as it is affiliated with one of the Alaska Health Corporations as a consortium member and has all of its IHS funding for the Village administered through an Alaska Health Corporation, a Title V compactor, is not eligible for consideration under the TMG program. Moreover, Congress has reenacted its moratorium in Alaska on new contracting under the ISDEAA with Alaska Native Tribes that do not already have contracts or compacts with the IHS under this Act. See the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 (Jan. 17, 2014), Public Law 113- 76, 128 Stat. 5, 343-44: SEC. 424. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law and until October 1, 2018, the Indian Health Service may not disburse funds for the provision of health care services pursuant to Public Law 93-638 (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.) to any Alaska Native village or Alaska Native village corporation that is located within the area served by an Alaska Native regional health entity. Consequently, Alaska Native Villages will not have any opportunity to enter into an ISDEAA contract with the IHS until this law lapses on October 1, 2018. Other Limitations--A current TMG recipient cannot be awarded a new, renewal, or competing continuation grant for any of the following reasons: [cir] The grantee will be administering two TMGs at the same time or have overlapping project/budget periods; [cir] The current project is not progressing in a satisfactory manner; [cir] The current project is not in compliance with program and financial reporting requirements; or [cir] The applicant has an outstanding delinquent Federal debt. No award shall be made until either: [ssquf] The delinquent account is paid in full; or [ssquf] A negotiated repayment schedule is established and at least one payment is received. 6. Electronic Submission Requirements All applications must be submitted electronically. Please use the http://www.Grants.gov Web site to submit an application electronically and select the ``Find Grant Opportunities'' link on the homepage. Download a copy of the application package, complete it offline, and then upload and submit the completed application via the http://www.Grants.gov Web site. Electronic copies of the application may not be submitted as attachments to email messages addressed to IHS employees or offices. If the applicant receives a waiver to submit paper application documents, they must follow the rules and timelines that are noted below. The applicant must seek assistance at least ten days prior to the Application Deadline Date listed in the Key Dates section on page one of this announcement. Applicants that do not adhere to the timelines for System for Award Management (SAM) and/or http://www.Grants.gov registration or that fail to request timely assistance with technical issues will not be considered for a waiver to submit a paper application. Please be aware of the following: Please search for the application package in http://www.Grants.gov by entering the CFDA number or the Funding Opportunity Number. Both numbers are located in the header of this announcement. If you experience technical challenges while submitting your application electronically, please contact Grants.gov Support directly at: [email protected] or (800) 518-4726. Customer Support is available to address questions 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (except on Federal holidays). Upon contacting Grants.gov, obtain a tracking number as proof of contact. The tracking number is helpful if there are technical issues that cannot be resolved and a waiver from the agency must be obtained. If it is determined that a waiver is needed, the applicant must submit a request in writing (emails are acceptable) to [email protected] with a copy to [email protected]. Please include a clear justification for the need to deviate from the standard electronic submission process. If the waiver is approved, the application should be sent directly to the DGM by the Application Deadline Date listed in the Key Dates section on page one of this announcement. Applicants are strongly encouraged not to wait until the deadline date to begin the application process through Grants.gov as the registration process for SAM and Grants.gov could take up to fifteen working days. Please use the optional attachment feature in Grants.gov to attach additional documentation that may be requested by the DGM. All applicants must comply with any page limitation requirements described in this Funding Announcement. After electronically submitting the application, the applicant will receive an automatic acknowledgment from Grants.gov that contains a Grants.gov tracking number. The DGM will download the application from Grants.gov and provide necessary copies to the appropriate agency officials. Neither the DGM nor the Office of Direct [[Page 14398]] Service and Contracting Tribes will notify the applicant that the application has been received. Email applications will not be accepted under this announcement. Universal Entity Identifier (UEI) Numbering System All IHS applicants and grantee organizations are required to obtain a UEI number and maintain an active registration in the SAM database. The UEI number is a unique 9-digit identification number which uniquely identifies each entity. The UEI number is site specific; therefore, each distinct performance site may be assigned a UEI number. Obtaining a UEI number is easy, and there is no charge. To obtain a UEI number, please contact Mr. Paul Gettys on (301) 443-2114. All HHS recipients are required by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006, as amended (``Transparency Act''), to report information on subawards. Accordingly, all IHS grantees must notify potential first-tier subrecipients that no entity may receive a first-tier subaward unless the entity has provided its UEI number to the prime grantee organization. This requirement ensures the use of a universal identifier to enhance the quality of information available to the public pursuant to the Transparency Act. System for Award Management (SAM) Organizations that were not registered with Central Contractor Registration and have not registered with SAM will need to obtain a UEI number first and then access the SAM online registration through the SAM home page at https://www.sam.gov (U.S. organizations will also need to provide an Employer Identification Number from the Internal Revenue Service that may take an additional 2-5 weeks to become active). Completing and submitting the registration takes approximately one hour to complete and SAM registration will take 3-5 business days to process. Registration with the SAM is free of charge. Applicants may register online at https://www.sam.gov. Additional information on implementing the Transparency Act, including the specific requirements for UEI and SAM, can be found on the IHS Grants Management, Grants Policy Web site: https://www.ihs.gov/dgm/index.cfm?module=dsp_dgm_policy_topics. V. Application Review Information The instructions for preparing the application narrative also constitute the evaluation criteria for reviewing and scoring the application. Weights assigned to each section are noted in parentheses. The 15-page narrative should include only the first year of activities; information for multi-year projects should be included as an appendix. See ``Multi-year Project Requirements'' at the end of this section for more information. The narrative section should be written in a manner that is clear to outside reviewers unfamiliar with prior related activities of the applicant. It should be well organized, succinct, and contain all information necessary for reviewers to understand the project fully. Points will be assigned to each evaluation criteria adding up to a total of 100 points. A minimum score of 60 points is required for funding. Points are assigned as follows: 1. Criteria A. Introduction and Need for Assistance (20 points) (1) Describe the T/TO's current health operation. Include what programs and services are currently provided (i.e., Federally-funded, State-funded, etc.), information regarding technologies currently used (i.e., hardware, software, services, etc.), and identify the source(s) of technical support for those technologies (i.e., Tribal staff, Area Office, vendor, etc.). Include information regarding whether the T/TO has a health department and/or health board and how long it has been operating. (2) Describe the population to be served by the proposed project. Include the number of eligible IHS beneficiaries who currently use the services. (3) Describe the geographic location of the proposed project including any geographic barriers to the health care users in the area to be served. (4) Identify all TMGs received since FY 2010, dates of funding and a summary of project accomplishments. State how previous TMG funds facilitated the progression of health development relative to the current proposed project. (Copies of reports will not be accepted.) (5) Identify the eligible project type and priority group of the applicant. (6) Explain the need/reason for the proposed project by identifying specific gaps or weaknesses in services or infrastructure that will be addressed by the proposed project. Explain how these gaps/weaknesses have been assessed. (7) If the proposed project includes information technology (i.e., hardware, software, etc.), provide further information regarding measures taken or to be taken that ensure the proposed project will not create other gaps in services or infrastructure (i.e., negatively affect or impact IHS interface capability, Government Performance and Results Act reporting requirements, contract reporting requirements, Information Technology (IT) compatibility, etc.) if applicable. (8) Describe the effect of the proposed project on current programs (i.e., Federally-funded, State-funded, etc.) and, if applicable, on current equipment (i.e., hardware, software, services, etc.). Include the effect of the proposed project on planned/anticipated programs and/ or equipment. (9) Address how the proposed project relates to the purpose of the TMG Program by addressing the appropriate description that follows: Identify if the T/TO is an IHS Title I contractor. Address if the self-determination contract is a master contract of several programs or if individual contracts are used for each program. Include information regarding whether or not the Tribe participates in a consortium contract (i.e., more than one Tribe participating in a contract). Address what programs are currently provided through those contracts and how the proposed project will enhance the organization's capacity to manage the contracts currently in place. Identify if the T/TO is not a Title I organization. Address how the proposed project will enhance the organization's management capabilities, what programs and services the organization is currently seeking to contract and an anticipated date for contract. Identify if the T/TO is an IHS Title V compactor. Address when the T/TO entered into the compact and how the proposed project will further enhance the organization's management capabilities. B. Project Objective(s), Work Plan and Approach (40 points) (1) Identify the proposed project objective(s) addressing the following: Objectives must be measureable and (if applicable) quantifiable. Objectives must be results oriented. Objectives must be time-limited. Example: By installing new third-party billing software, the Tribe will increase the number of bills processed by 15 percent at the end of 12 months. (2) Address how the proposed project will result in change or improvement in program operations or processes for each proposed project objective. Also address what tangible products are expected from the project (i.e., policies and procedures manual, health plan, etc.). [[Page 14399]] (3) Address the extent to which the proposed project will build local capacity to provide, improve, or expand services that address the need(s) of the target population. (4) Submit a work plan in the Appendix which includes the following information: Provide the action steps on a timeline for accomplishing the proposed project objective(s). Identify who will perform the action steps. Identify who will supervise the action steps taken. Identify what tangible products will be produced during and at the end of the proposed project. Identify who will accept and/or approve work products during the duration of the proposed project and at the end of the proposed project. Include any training that will take place during the proposed project and who will be providing and attending the training. Include evaluation activities planned in the work plans. (5) If consultants or contractors will be used during the proposed project, please include the following information in their scope of work (or note if consultants/contractors will not be used): Educational requirements. Desired qualifications and work experience. Expected work products to be delivered on a timeline. If a potential consultant/contractor has already been identified, please include a resume in the Appendix. (6) Describe what updates (i.e., revision of policies/procedures, upgrades, technical support, etc.) will be required for the continued success of the proposed project. Include when these updates are anticipated and where funds will come from to conduct the update and/or maintenance. C. Program Evaluation (20 points) Each proposed objective requires an evaluation component to assess its progression and ensure its completion. Also, include the evaluation activities in the work plan. Describe the proposed plan to evaluate both outcomes and processes. Outcome evaluation relates to the results identified in the objectives, and process evaluation relates to the work plan and activities of the project. (1) For outcome evaluation, describe: What will the criteria be for determining success of each objective? What data will be collected to determine whether the objective was met? At what intervals will data be collected? Who will collect the data and their qualifications? How will the data be analyzed? How will the results be used? (2) For process evaluation, describe: How will the project be monitored and assessed for potential problems and needed quality improvements? Who will be responsible for monitoring and managing project improvements based on results of ongoing process improvements and their qualifications? How will ongoing monitoring be used to improve the project? Describe any products, such as manuals or policies, that might be developed and how they might lend themselves to replication by others. How will the organization document what is learned throughout the project period? (3) Describe any evaluation efforts planned after the grant period has ended. (4) Describe the ultimate benefit to the Tribe that is expected to result from this project. An example of this might be the ability of the Tribe to expand preventive health services because of increased billing and third party payments. D. Organizational Capabilities, Key Personnel and Qualifications (15 points) This section outlines the broader capacity of the organization to complete the project outlined in the work plan. It includes the identification of personnel responsible for completing tasks and the chain of responsibility for successful completion of the projects outlined in the work plan. (1) Describe the organizational structure of the T/TO beyond health care activities, if applicable. (2) Provide information regarding plans to obtain management systems if the T/TO does not have an established management system currently in place that complies with 25 CFR part 900, subpart F, ``Standards for Tribal or Tribal Organization Management Systems.'' State if management systems are already in place and how long the systems have been in place. (3) Describe the ability of the organization to manage the proposed project. Include information regarding similarly sized projects in scope and financial assistance as well as other grants and projects successfully completed. (4) Describe what equipment (i.e., fax machine, phone, computer, etc.) and facility space (i.e., office space) will be available for use during the proposed project. Include information about any equipment not currently available that will be purchased through the grant. (5) List key personnel who will work on the project. Include all titles of key personnel in the work plan. In the Appendix, include position descriptions and resumes for all key personnel. Position descriptions should clearly describe each position and duties, indicating desired qualifications and experience requirements related to the proposed project. Resumes must indicate that the proposed staff member is qualified to carry out the proposed project activities. If a position is to be filled, indicate that information on the proposed position description. (6) Address how the T/TO will sustain the position(s) after the grant expires if the project requires additional personnel (i.e., IT support, etc.). State if there is no need for additional personnel. (7) If the personnel are to be only partially funded by this grant, indicate the percentage of time to be allocated to the project and identify the resources used to fund the remainder of the individual's salary. E. Categorical Budget and Budget Justification (5 points) (1) Provide a categorical budget for each of the 12-month budget periods requested. (2) If indirect costs are claimed, indicate and apply the current negotiated rate to the budget. Include a copy of the rate agreement in the Appendix. (3) Provide a narrative justification explaining why each categorical budget line item is necessary and relevant to the proposed project. Include sufficient cost and other details to facilitate the determination of cost allowability (i.e., equipment specifications, etc.). Multi-Year Project Requirements (if applicable) For projects requiring a second and/or third year, include only Year 2 and/or Year 3 narrative sections (objectives, evaluation components and work plan) that differ from those in Year 1. For every project year, include a full budget justification and a detailed, itemized categorical budget showing calculation methodologies for each item. The same weights and criteria which are used to evaluate a one- year project or the first year of a multi-year project will be applied when evaluating the second and third years of a multi-year application. A weak second and/or third year submission could negatively impact the overall score of an application and result in elimination of the proposed second and/or third years with a [[Page 14400]] recommendation for only a one-year award. Appendix Items Work plan, logic model and/or time line for proposed objectives. Position descriptions for key staff. Resumes of key staff that reflect current duties. Consultant or contractor proposed scope of work and letter of commitment (if applicable). Current Indirect Cost Agreement. Organizational chart. Additional documents to support narrative (i.e., data tables, key news articles, etc.). 2. Review and Selection Each application will be prescreened by the DGM staff for eligibility and completeness as outlined in the funding announcement. Applications that meet the eligibility criteria shall be reviewed for merit by the ORC based on evaluation criteria in this funding announcement. The ORC could be composed of both Tribal and Federal reviewers appointed by the IHS program to review and make recommendations on these applications. The technical review process ensures selection of quality projects in a national competition for limited funding. Incomplete applications and applications that are non- responsive to the eligibility criteria will not be referred to the ORC. The applicant will be notified via email of this decision by the Grants Management Officer of the DGM. Applicants will be notified by DGM, via email, to outline minor missing components (i.e., budget narratives, audit documentation, key contact form) needed for an otherwise complete application. All missing documents must be sent to DGM on or before the due date listed in the email of notification of missing documents required. To obtain a minimum score for funding by the ORC, applicants must address all program requirements and provide all required documentation. VI. Award Administration Information 1. Award Notices The Notice of Award (NoA) is a legally binding document signed by the Grants Management Officer and serves as the official notification of the grant award. The NoA will be initiated by the DGM in our grant system, GrantSolutions (https://www.grantsolutions.gov). Each entity that is approved for funding under this announcement will need to request or have a user account in GrantSolutions in order to retrieve their NoA. The NoA is the authorizing document for which funds are dispersed to the approved entities and reflects the amount of Federal funds awarded, the purpose of the grant, the terms and conditions of the award, the effective date of the award, and the budget/project period. Disapproved Applicants Applicants who received a score less than the recommended funding level for approval (60 points required) and were deemed to be disapproved by the ORC, will receive an Executive Summary Statement from the Office of Direct Service and Contracting Tribes (ODSCT) within 30 days of the conclusion of the ORC outlining the strengths and weaknesses of their application submitted. The ODSCT will also provide additional contact information as needed to address questions and concerns as well as provide technical assistance if desired. Approved but Unfunded Applicants Approved but unfunded applicants that met the minimum scoring range and were deemed by the ORC to be ``Approved,'' but were not funded due to lack of funding, will have their applications held by DGM for a period of one year. If additional funding becomes available during the course of FY 2015 the approved but unfunded application may be re- considered by the awarding program office for possible funding. The applicant will also receive an Executive Summary Statement from the IHS program office within 30 days of the conclusion of the ORC. Note: Any correspondence other than the official NoA signed by an IHS Grants Management Official announcing to the Project Director that an award has been made to their organization is not an authorization to implement their program on behalf of IHS. 2. Administrative Requirements Grants are administered in accordance with the following regulations, policies, and OMB cost principles: A. The criteria as outlined in this Program Announcement. B. Administrative Regulations for Grants: Uniform Administrative Requirements for Federal Awards located at 45 CFR part 75. C. Grants Policy: HHS Grants Policy Statement, Revised 01/07. D. Cost Principles: Uniform Administrative Requirements for Federal Awards, ``Cost Principles,'' located at 45 CFR part 75, subpart E. E. Audit Requirements: Uniform Administrative Requirements for Federal Awards, ``Audit Requirements,'' located at 45 CFR part 75, subpart F. 3. Indirect Costs This section applies to all grant recipients that request reimbursement of indirect costs (IDC) in their grant application. In accordance with HHS Grants Policy Statement, Part II-27, IHS requires applicants to obtain a current IDC rate agreement prior to award. The rate agreement must be prepared in accordance with the applicable cost principles and guidance as provided by the cognizant agency or office. A current rate covers the applicable grant activities under the current award's budget period. If the current rate is not on file with the DGM at the time of award, the IDC portion of the budget will be restricted. The restrictions remain in place until the current rate is provided to the DGM. Generally, IDC rates for IHS grantees are negotiated with the Division of Cost Allocation (DCA) https://rates.psc.gov/ and the Department of Interior (Interior Business Center) http://www.doi.gov/ibc/services/Indirect_Cost_Services/index.cfm. For questions regarding the indirect cost policy, please call the Grants Management Specialist listed under ``Agency Contacts'' or the main DGM office at (301) 443- 5204. 4. Reporting Requirements The grantee must submit required reports consistent with the applicable deadlines. Failure to submit required reports within the time allowed may result in suspension or termination of an active grant, withholding of additional awards for the project, or other enforcement actions such as withholding of payments or converting to the reimbursement method of payment. Continued failure to submit required reports may result in one or both of the following: (1) The imposition of special award provisions; and (2) the non-funding or non- award of other eligible projects or activities. This requirement applies whether the delinquency is attributable to the failure of the grantee organization or the individual responsible for preparation of the reports. Reports must be submitted electronically via GrantSolutions. Personnel responsible for submitting reports will be required to obtain a login and password for GrantSolutions. Please see the Agency Contacts list in section VII for the systems contact information. The reporting requirements for this program are noted below. [[Page 14401]] A. Progress Reports Program progress reports are required semi-annually within 30 days after the budget period ends. These reports must include a brief comparison of actual accomplishments to the goals established for the period, or, if applicable, provide sound justification for the lack of progress, and other pertinent information as required. A final report must be submitted within 90 days of expiration of the budget/project period. B. Financial Reports Federal Financial Report FFR (SF-425), Cash Transaction Reports are due 30 days after the close of every calendar quarter to the Payment Management Services, HHS at: http://www.dpm.psc.gov. It is recommended that the applicant also send a copy of the FFR (SF-425) report to the Grants Management Specialist. Failure to submit timely reports may cause a disruption in timely payments to the organization. Grantees are responsible and accountable for accurate information being reported on all required reports: The Progress Reports and Federal Financial Report. C. Federal Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) This award may be subject to the Transparency Act subaward and executive compensation reporting requirements of 2 CFR part 170. The Transparency Act requires the OMB to establish a single searchable database, accessible to the public, with information on financial assistance awards made by Federal agencies. The Transparency Act also includes a requirement for recipients of Federal grants to report information about first-tier subawards and executive compensation under Federal assistance awards. IHS has implemented a Term of Award into all IHS Standard Terms and Conditions, NoAs and funding announcements regarding the FSRS reporting requirement. This IHS Term of Award is applicable to all IHS grant and cooperative agreements issued on or after October 1, 2010, with a $25,000 subaward obligation dollar threshold met for any specific reporting period. Additionally, all new (discretionary) IHS awards (where the project period is made up of more than one budget period) and where: 1) the project period start date was October 1, 2010 or after and 2) the primary awardee will have a $25,000 subaward obligation dollar threshold during any specific reporting period will be required to address the FSRS reporting. For the full IHS award term implementing this requirement and additional award applicability information, visit the DGM Grants Policy Web site at: https://www.ihs.gov/dgm/index.cfm?module=dsp_dgm_policy_topics. Telecommunication for the hearing impaired is available at: TTY (301) 443-6394. VII. Agency Contacts 1. Questions on the programmatic issues may be directed to: Ms. Patricia Spotted Horse, Program Analyst, Office of Direct Service and Contracting Tribes, Indian Health Service, 801 Thompson Avenue, Suite 220, Rockville, MD 20852-1609, Telephone: (301) 443-1104, Email: [email protected]. 2. Questions on grants management and fiscal matters may be directed to: Mr. Pallop Chareonvootitam, Grants Management Specialist, Office of Management Services, Division of Grants Management, 801 Thompson Avenue, TMP Suite 360, Rockville, MD 20852-1609, Telephone: (301) 443-5204, Fax: (301) 443-9602, Email: [email protected]. 3. Questions on systems matters may be directed to: Mr. Paul Gettys, Grant Systems Coordinator, Office of Management Services, Division of Grants Management, 801 Thompson Avenue, TMP Suite 360, Rockville, MD 20852, Phone: (301) 443-2114; or the DGM main line (301) 443-5204, Fax: (301) 443-9602, Email: [email protected]. VIII. Other Information The PHS strongly encourages all cooperative agreement and contract recipients to provide a smoke-free workplace and promote the non-use of all tobacco products. In addition, Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in certain facilities (or in some cases, any portion of the facility) in which regular or routine education, library, day care, health care, or early childhood development services are provided to children. This is consistent with the HHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of the American people. Dated: March 12, 2015. Robert G. McSwain, Acting Director, Indian Health Service. [FR Doc. 2015-06353 Filed 3-18-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4165-16-P
![14392 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Notices
evidence that the illness, disability, 8. James Kois, Latham, New York, Court of Court of Federal Claims No: 15–0167V
injury, condition, or death described in Federal Claims No: 15–0109V 38. Mamotabo Matshela, Chicago, Illinois,
the petition is due to factors unrelated 9. Michael Perkins, Elgin, Illinois, Court of Court of Federal Claims No: 15–0168V
Federal Claims No: 15–0112V 39. Jennifer L. Check, Memphis, Tennessee,
to the administration of the vaccine
10. Shanelle Mattus-Lang on behalf of D.J.W., Court of Federal Claims No: 15–0169V
described in the petition,’’ and Santa Clara, California, Court of Federal 40. Thaddee Michaud, Rochester, New York,
2. Any allegation in a petition that the Claims No: 15–0113V Court of Federal Claims No: 15–0170V
petitioner either: 11. Michael D. Hudson, Huntsville, Texas, 41. Tyler Steen, Cedar Falls, Iowa, Court of
a. ‘‘Sustained, or had significantly Court of Federal Claims No: 15–0114V Federal Claims No: 15–0176V
aggravated, any illness, disability, 12. Adele Phillips, Syracuse, New York, 42. Britany Greek on behalf of C.T.G., Lake
injury, or condition not set forth in the Court of Federal Claims No: 15–0115V City, Florida, Court of Federal Claims
Vaccine Injury Table but which was 13. Amanda Seiders and Adam Seiders on No: 15–0178V
caused by’’ one of the vaccines referred behalf of H.S., Cypress, Texas, Court of 43. Francisco Tamez and Luz Tamez on
to in the Table, or Federal Claims No: 15–0117V behalf of E.T., Las Cruces, New Mexico,
14. Carrie M. Broschart on behalf of Amelia Court of Federal Claims No: 15–0181V
b. ‘‘Sustained, or had significantly
F. Beaver, Danville, Pennsylvania, Court 44. Victor Fullerton, Cadillac, Michigan,
aggravated, any illness, disability, of Federal Claims No: 15–0118V Court of Federal Claims No: 15–0182V
injury, or condition set forth in the 15. Terra Schaller, Portland, Oregon, Court of 45. Lynette Brayboy on behalf of L.B.,
Vaccine Injury Table the first symptom Federal Claims No: 15–0120V Baraboo, Wisconsin, Court of Federal
or manifestation of the onset or 16. Christine Torres on behalf of L.T., Claims No: 15–0183V
significant aggravation of which did not Rochester, New York, Court of Federal 46. Mary E. Forde, Columbus, Ohio, Court of
occur within the time period set forth in Claims No: 15–0124V Federal Claims No: 15–0185V
the Table but which was caused by a 17. Kristie Roby, Sumter, Florida, Court of 47. Jered R. Anderson, Faribault, Minnesota,
vaccine’’ referred to in the Table. Federal Claims No: 15–0125V Court of Federal Claims No: 15–0187V
In accordance with Section 18. Joanne Jennings, Covington, Louisiana,
[FR Doc. 2015–06279 Filed 3–18–15; 8:45 am]
Court of Federal Claims No: 15–0131V
2112(b)(2), all interested persons may 19. Madeline Moorman, Overland Park, BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
submit written information relevant to Kansas, Court of Federal Claims No: 15–
the issues described above in the case of 0132V
the petitions listed below. Any person 20. Amy Lyn Vakalis, Baraboo, Wisconsin, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
choosing to do so should file an original Court of Federal Claims No: 15–0134V HUMAN SERVICES
and three (3) copies of the information 21. Judith Jetson, Weaverville, North
with the Clerk of the U.S. Court of Carolina, Court of Federal Claims No: Indian Health Service
Federal Claims at the address listed 15–0138V
above (under the heading ‘‘For Further 22. Julie Reiling on behalf of G.R., Phoenix, Office of Direct Service and
Arizona, Court of Federal Claims No: 15– Contracting Tribes; Tribal Management
Information Contact’’), with a copy to 0139V
HRSA addressed to Director, Division of Grant Program
23. Virginia Ives, Portland, Oregon, Court of
Injury Compensation Programs, Federal Claims No: 15–0140V Announcement Type: New and
Healthcare Systems Bureau, 5600 24 Bridgette Wiley, Conyers, Georgia, Court Competing Continuation.
Fishers Lane, Room 11C–26, Rockville, of Federal Claims No: 15–0141V
MD 20857. The Court’s caption 25. Paulette Cummins, Beverly Hills, Funding Announcement Number:
(Petitioner’s Name v. Secretary of Health California, Court of Federal Claims No: HHS–2015–IHS–TMD–0001.
and Human Services) and the docket 15–0142V Catalog of Federal Domestic
number assigned to the petition should 26. Katelyn Garner, Baraboo, Wisconsin, Assistance Number: 93.228.
Court of Federal Claims No: 15–0143V
be used as the caption for the written 27. Timothy F. Grieb, Seattle, Washington, Key Dates
submission. Chapter 35 of title 44, Court of Federal Claims No: 15–0144V
United States Code, related to 28. Kimberly Norwood and Clifford Norwood Application Deadline Date: June 3,
paperwork reduction, does not apply to on behalf of Cassidi Norwood, Atlanta, 2015.
information required for purposes of Georgia, Court of Federal Claims No: 15– Review Date: June 22–26, 2015.
carrying out the Program. 0145V
29. Dorothy Gray, Phoenix, Arizona, Court of Earliest Anticipated Start Date:
Dated: March 13, 2015. September 1, 2015.
Federal Claims No: 15–0146V
Mary K. Wakefield, 30. Francine Mack, Cheyenne, Wyoming, Signed Tribal Resolutions Due Date:
Administrator. Court of Federal Claims No: 15–0149V June 19, 2015.
31. Ronald Watkins, Philadelphia,
List of Petitions Filed Pennsylvania, Court of Federal Claims Proof of Non-Profit Status Due Date:
1. Melissa Kirdzik on behalf of John Henry No: 15–0150V June 3, 2015.
Watts, IV, Newport, Rhode Island, Court 32. Danielle Groom, Fairview Heights, I. Funding Opportunity Description
of Federal Claims No: 15–0098V Illinois, Court of Federal Claims No: 15–
2. Maria Echevarria on behalf of D.E., 0157V Statutory Authority
Deceased, Piermont, New York, Court of 33. Hailey Davis and Chad Davis on behalf
Federal Claims No: 15–0100V of R.D., Cordele, Georgia, Court of The Indian Health Service (IHS) is
3. Susan Marshall on behalf of Antron Jarvar Federal Claims No: 15–0159V accepting competitive grant applications
Thompson, Decatur, Georgia, Court of 34. Adan Gomez and Raquel Ayon on behalf for the Tribal Management Grant (TMG)
Federal Claims No: 15–0102V of Joel Gomez, Deceased, Rosemead, program. This program is authorized
4. James Riley and Brandy Riley on behalf of California, Court of Federal Claims No: under 25 U.S.C. 450h(b)(2) and 25
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
E.R., Huntington, West Virginia, Court of 15–0160V U.S.C. 450h(e) of the Indian Health Self-
Federal Claims No: 15–0104V 35. Demarco Johnson and Lateasha Johnson
Determination and Education
5. Shannon Apodaca, Alamosa, Colorado, on behalf of D.J., Hendersonville,
Court of Federal Claims No: 15–0106V Tennessee, Court of Federal Claims No: Assistance Act (ISDEAA), Public Law
6. Aaron Prior, Lincoln, Nebraska, Court of 15–0164V (Pub. L.) 93–638, as amended. This
Federal Claims No: 15–0107V 36. Jessica Crefasi, Mandeville, Louisiana, program is described in the Catalog of
7. David Thomas, Brookfield, Wisconsin, Court of Federal Claims No: 15–0166V Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA)
Court of Federal Claims No: 15–0108V 37. Ova Franklin Kelly, Orlando, Florida, under 93.228.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:18 Mar 18, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM 19MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_14445/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Notices 14393
Background IHS is under no obligation to make (4) health management structure.
The TMG Program is a competitive awards that are selected for funding Applicants may submit applications for
grant program that is capacity building under this announcement. one project type only. Applicants must
and developmental in nature and has state the project type selected.
Anticipated Number of Awards
been available for Federally-recognized Applications that address more than one
Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations Approximately 16–18 awards will be project type will be considered
(T/TO) since shortly after the passage of issued under this program ineligible. The maximum funding levels
the ISDEAA in 1975. It was established announcement. noted include both direct and indirect
to assist T/TO to assume all or part of costs. Applicant budgets may not
Project Period
existing IHS programs, functions, exceed the maximum funding level or
The project periods vary based on the project period identified for a project
services, and activities (PFSA) and
project type selected. Project periods type. Applicants whose budget or
further develop and improve their
could run from one, two, or three years project period exceed the maximum
health management capability. The
and will run consecutively from the funding level or project period will be
TMG Program provides competitive
earliest anticipated start date of deemed ineligible and will not be
grants to T/TO to establish goals and
September 1, 2015 through August 31, reviewed. Please refer to Section IV.5,
performance measures for current health
2016 for one year projects; September 1, ‘‘Funding Restrictions’’ for further
programs; assess current management
2015 through August 31, 2017 for two information regarding ineligible project
capacity to determine if new
year projects; and September 1, 2015 activities.
components are appropriate; analyze 1. FEASIBILITY STUDY (Maximum
through August 31, 2018 for three year
programs to determine if T/TO funding/project period: $70,000/12
projects. Please refer to ‘‘Eligible TMG
management is practicable; and develop months)
Project Types, Maximum Funding
infrastructure systems to manage or The Feasibility Study must include a
Levels and Project Periods’’ below for
organize PFSA. study of a specific IHS program or
additional details. State the number of
Purpose years for the project period and include segment of a program to determine if
The purpose of this IHS grant the exact dates. Tribal management of the program is
announcement is to announce the possible. The study shall present the
III. Eligibility Information planned approach, training, and
availability of the TMG Program to
enhance and develop health 1. Eligibility resources required to assume Tribal
management infrastructure and assist T/ management of the program. The study
Eligible Applicants: ‘‘Indian Tribes’’
TO in assuming all or part of existing must include the following four
and ‘‘Tribal organizations’’ (T/TO) as
IHS PSFA through a Title I contract and components:
defined by the ISDEAA are eligible to • Health needs and health care
assist established Title I contractors and apply for the TMG Program. The services assessments that identify
Title V compactors to further develop definitions for each entity type are existing health care services and
and improve their management outlined below. Only one application delivery systems, program divisibility
capability. In addition, TMGs are per T/TO is allowed. issues, health status indicators, unmet
available to T/TO under the authority of Definitions: ‘‘Indian Tribe’’ means any needs, volume projections, and demand
25 U.S.C. 450h(e) for: (1) Obtaining Indian tribe, band, nation, or other analysis.
technical assistance from providers organized group or community, • Management analysis of existing
designated by the T/TO (including T/TO including any Alaska Native village or management structures, proposed
that operate mature contracts) for the regional or village corporation as management structures, implementation
purposes of program planning and defined in or established pursuant to the plans and requirements, and personnel
evaluation, including the development Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (85 staffing requirements and recruitment
of any management systems necessary Stat. 688) [43 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq.], barriers.
for contract management and the which is recognized as eligible for the • Financial analysis of historical
development of cost allocation plans for special programs and services provided trends data, financial projections and
indirect cost rates; and (2) planning, by the United States to Indians because new resource requirements for program
designing, monitoring, and evaluation of of their status as Indians. 25 U.S.C. management costs and analysis of
Federal programs serving the T/TO, § 450b(e). potential revenues from Federal/non-
including Federal administrative ‘‘Tribal organization’’ means the Federal sources.
functions. recognized governing body of any • Decision statement/report that
II. Award Information Indian tribe; any legally established incorporates findings, conclusions and
organization of Indians which is recommendations; the presentation of
Type of Award controlled, sanctioned, or chartered by the study and recommendations to the
Grant. such governing body or which is Tribal governing body for determination
democratically elected by the adult regarding whether Tribal assumption of
Estimated Funds Available members of the Indian community to be program(s) is desirable or warranted.
The total amount of funding served by such organization and which 2. PLANNING (Maximum funding/
identified for the current fiscal year (FY) includes the maximum participation of project period: $50,000/12 months)
2015 is approximately $2,412,000. Indians in all phases of its activities. 25 Planning projects entail a collection of
Individual award amounts are U.S.C. § 450b(l). data to establish goals and performance
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
anticipated to be between $50,000 and Tribal organizations must provide measures for the operation of current
$100,000. The amount of funding proof of non-profit status. health programs or anticipated PFSA
available for competing and Eligible TMG Project Types, under a Title I contract. Planning
continuation awards issued under this Maximum Funding Levels and Project projects will specify the design of health
announcement is subject to the Periods: The TMG Program consists of programs and the management systems
availability of appropriations and four project types: (1) Feasibility study; (including appropriate policies and
budgetary priorities of the Agency. The (2) planning; (3) evaluation study; and procedures) to accomplish the health
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:18 Mar 18, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM 19MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_14445/page/2.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Notices 14401
A. Progress Reports period will be required to address the DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
Program progress reports are required FSRS reporting. For the full IHS award HUMAN SERVICES
semi-annually within 30 days after the term implementing this requirement
and additional award applicability National Institutes of Health
budget period ends. These reports must
include a brief comparison of actual information, visit the DGM Grants
Policy Web site at: https://www.ihs.gov/ Center for Scientific Review Notice of
accomplishments to the goals Closed Meetings
established for the period, or, if dgm/index.cfm?module=dsp_dgm_
applicable, provide sound justification policy_topics. Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
for the lack of progress, and other Telecommunication for the hearing Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
pertinent information as required. A impaired is available at: TTY (301) 443– amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is
final report must be submitted within 90 6394. hereby given of the following meetings.
days of expiration of the budget/project The meetings will be closed to the
period. VII. Agency Contacts public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
B. Financial Reports 1. Questions on the programmatic 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
issues may be directed to: Ms. Patricia as amended. The grant applications and
Federal Financial Report FFR (SF–
Spotted Horse, Program Analyst, Office the discussions could disclose
425), Cash Transaction Reports are due
30 days after the close of every calendar of Direct Service and Contracting Tribes, confidential trade secrets or commercial
quarter to the Payment Management Indian Health Service, 801 Thompson property such as patentable material,
Services, HHS at: http:// Avenue, Suite 220, Rockville, MD and personal information concerning
www.dpm.psc.gov. It is recommended 20852–1609, Telephone: (301) 443– individuals associated with the grant
that the applicant also send a copy of 1104, Email: Patricia.SpottedHorse@ applications, the disclosure of which
the FFR (SF–425) report to the Grants ihs.gov. would constitute a clearly unwarranted
Management Specialist. Failure to 2. Questions on grants management invasion of personal privacy.
submit timely reports may cause a and fiscal matters may be directed to: Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
disruption in timely payments to the Mr. Pallop Chareonvootitam, Grants Review Special Emphasis Panel; Member
organization. Management Specialist, Office of Conflict: Eye Disease Mechanisms and
Grantees are responsible and Management Services, Division of Models.
accountable for accurate information Grants Management, 801 Thompson Date: April 14, 2015.
being reported on all required reports: Avenue, TMP Suite 360, Rockville, MD Time: 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
The Progress Reports and Federal 20852–1609, Telephone: (301) 443– Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Financial Report. 5204, Fax: (301) 443–9602, Email: Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701
Pallop.Chareonvootitam@ihs.gov. Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892,
C. Federal Subaward Reporting System
(FSRS) 3. Questions on systems matters may (Virtual Meeting).
be directed to: Mr. Paul Gettys, Grant Contact Person: Alessandra C Rovescalli,
This award may be subject to the Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National
Systems Coordinator, Office of
Transparency Act subaward and Institutes of Health, Center for Scientific
Management Services, Division of Review, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Rm. 5205
executive compensation reporting
Grants Management, 801 Thompson MSC7846, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435–
requirements of 2 CFR part 170.
Avenue, TMP Suite 360, Rockville, MD 1021, rovescaa@mail.nih.gov.
The Transparency Act requires the
20852, Phone: (301) 443–2114; or the Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
OMB to establish a single searchable
DGM main line (301) 443–5204, Fax: Review Special Emphasis Panel; Myalgic
database, accessible to the public, with
(301) 443–9602, Email: Paul.Gettys@ Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue
information on financial assistance
ihs.gov. Syndrome.
awards made by Federal agencies. The Date: April 14, 2015.
Transparency Act also includes a VIII. Other Information Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
requirement for recipients of Federal Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
grants to report information about first- The PHS strongly encourages all applications.
tier subawards and executive cooperative agreement and contract Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701
compensation under Federal assistance recipients to provide a smoke-free Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892,
awards. workplace and promote the non-use of (Virtual Meeting).
IHS has implemented a Term of all tobacco products. In addition, Public Contact Person: Lynn E Luethke, Ph.D.,
Award into all IHS Standard Terms and Law 103–227, the Pro-Children Act of Scientific Review Officer, Center for
1994, prohibits smoking in certain Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Conditions, NoAs and funding Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5166,
announcements regarding the FSRS facilities (or in some cases, any portion MSC 7844, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 806–
reporting requirement. This IHS Term of of the facility) in which regular or 3323, luethkel@csr.nih.gov.
Award is applicable to all IHS grant and routine education, library, day care, Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
cooperative agreements issued on or health care, or early childhood Review Special Emphasis Panel; SEP: 4D
after October 1, 2010, with a $25,000 development services are provided to Nucleome Network Organizational Hub.
subaward obligation dollar threshold children. This is consistent with the Date: April 15, 2015.
met for any specific reporting period. HHS mission to protect and advance the Time: 1:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
Additionally, all new (discretionary) physical and mental health of the Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IHS awards (where the project period is American people. applications.
made up of more than one budget Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701
Dated: March 12, 2015. Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892,
period) and where: 1) the project period (Virtual Meeting).
Robert G. McSwain,
start date was October 1, 2010 or after Contact Person: Allen Richon, Ph.D.,
and 2) the primary awardee will have a Acting Director, Indian Health Service.
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
$25,000 subaward obligation dollar [FR Doc. 2015–06353 Filed 3–18–15; 8:45 am] Scientific Review, National Institutes of
threshold during any specific reporting BILLING CODE 4165–16–P Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6184,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:18 Mar 18, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM 19MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_14445/page/10.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-21 09:42:22
Document Modified: 2018-02-21 09:42:22
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | June 3, 2015. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 14392 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR