80_FR_15247 80 FR 15192 - Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Changed Circumstances Review of Lanling Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd.

80 FR 15192 - Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Changed Circumstances Review of Lanling Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd.

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 55 (March 23, 2015)

Page Range15192-15193
FR Document2015-06558

On October 23, 2014, the Department of Commerce (Department) initiated a changed circumstance review (CCR) of the antidumping duty (AD) order on fresh garlic from the People's Republic of China (PRC) in response to a request from Lanling Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd. (Qingshui), a producer/exporter of fresh and peeled garlic from the People's Republic of China (PRC).\1\ Pursuant to section 751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.216, the Department preliminarily determines that Qingshui is the successor-in- interest to Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd. (Cangshan Qingshui). We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 55 (Monday, March 23, 2015) 
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 55 (Monday, March 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15192-15193]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06558]



[[Page 15192]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-831]


Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary 
Results of the Changed Circumstances Review of Lanling Qingshui 
Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd.

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On October 23, 2014, the Department of Commerce (Department) 
initiated a changed circumstance review (CCR) of the antidumping duty 
(AD) order on fresh garlic from the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 
response to a request from Lanling Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd. 
(Qingshui), a producer/exporter of fresh and peeled garlic from the 
People's Republic of China (PRC).\1\ Pursuant to section 751(b) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.216, the 
Department preliminarily determines that Qingshui is the successor-in-
interest to Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd. (Cangshan 
Qingshui). We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary 
results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China: 
Initiation of Changed Circumstances Review, 79 FR 63381 (October 23, 
2014) (CCR Initiation Notice).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective March 23, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hilary E. Sadler, Esq., AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4340.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On November 16, 1994, the Department published the AD order on 
fresh garlic from the PRC in the Federal Register.\2\ On September 4, 
2014, Qingshui requested that the Department conduct a CCR pursuant to 
section 751(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216(b) to determine that it 
is the successor-in-interest to Cangshan Qingshui for purposes of the 
Order.\3\ We received comments from no other parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Antidumping Duty Order: Fresh Garlic from the People's 
Republic of China, 59 FR 59209 (November 16, 1994) (Order).
    \3\ See Letter from Qingshui to the Secretary of Commerce, 
``Request for Request for Expedited Changed Circumstances 
Determination--Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China 
(Case No. A-570-831),'' September 4, 2014 (Qingshui CCR Request).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on this information, the Department initiated this CCR on 
October 16, 2014, explaining that while there was sufficient evidence 
to initiate a changed circumstances review, the Department needed to 
request additional information for this review as provided by 19 CFR 
351.221(b)(2).\4\ On October 29, 2014, the Department issued its 
initial CCR questionnaire to Qingshui, and Qingshui timely responded to 
the Department's questionnaire.\5\ The Department did not receive 
comments from other interested parties concerning Qingshui's 
questionnaire response.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ CCR Initiation Notice.
    \5\ See Letter to Qingshui from Mark E. Hoadley, AD/CVD 
Operations, Program Manager, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, 
``Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China: Changed 
Circumstances Review--Lanling Qingshui/Cangshan Qingshui,'' October 
29, 2014 (Qingshui CCR Questionnaire); see also Letter from Qingshui 
to the Secretary of Commerce, ``Changed Circumstances 
Determination--Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China 
(Case No. A-570-831)--Response to Questionnaire,'' November 18, 2014 
(Qingshui CCR Questionnaire Response).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by this order is all grades of garlic, 
whether whole or separated into constituent cloves. The subject 
merchandise is currently classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 0703.20.0000, 
0703.20.0010, 0703.20.0020, 0703.20.0090, 0710.80.7060, 0710.80.9750, 
0711.90.6000, 0711.90.6500, 2005.90.9500, 2005.90.9700, 0703.20.0005, 
2005.99.9700 and 0703.20.0015. Although the HTSUS subheadings are 
provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product 
description is dispositive.
    A complete description of the scope of the order is contained in 
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\6\ The Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and ACCESS is available to 
all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main 
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance, ``Decision Memorandum for the 
Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances 
Review of Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China: Lanling 
Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd.,'' dated concurrently and hereby 
adopted in this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    In accordance with section 751(b)(1) of the Act, we are conducting 
this changed circumstances review based upon the information contained 
in Qingshui's submissions.\7\ In making a successor-in-interest 
determination, the Department typically examines several factors 
including, but not limited to, changes in: (1) Management; (2) 
production facilities; (3) supplier relationships; and (4) customer 
base.\8\ While no single factor or combination of factors will 
necessarily be dispositive, the Department generally will consider the 
new company to be the successor to the predecessor if the resulting 
operations of the successor are not materially dissimilar to that of 
its predecessor.\9\ Thus, if the record demonstrates that, with respect 
to the production and sale of the subject merchandise, the new company 
operates as the same business entity as the predecessor company, the 
Department may assign the new company the cash deposit rate of its 
predecessor.\10\ For a full description of the methodology underlying 
our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Qingshui CCR Request and Qingshui CCR Questionnaire 
Response.
    \8\ See, e.g., Certain Activated Carbon From the People's 
Republic of China: Notice of Initiation of Changed Circumstances 
Review, 74 FR 19934, 19935 (April 30, 2009).
    \9\ See, e.g., Notice of Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed 
Circumstances Review: Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges from 
India, 71 FR 327, 327 (January 4, 2006).
    \10\ See, e.g., Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon From Norway; 
Final Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, 64 FR 9979, 9980 (March 1, 1999).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of the Changed Circumstances Review

    Based on the evidence reviewed, we preliminarily determine that 
Qingshui is the successor-in-interest to Cangshan Qingshui. 
Specifically, we find that any changes that may have occurred after 
``Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd'' became ``Lanling 
Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd.'' did not constitute material 
changes to management, production facilities, supplier relationships, 
customer relationships, or ownership/legal

[[Page 15193]]

structure with respect to the production and sale of the subject 
merchandise. Thus, we preliminarily determine that Qingshui operates as 
the same business entity as Cangshan Qingshui with respect to the 
subject merchandise. A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum appears in the Appendix to this notice.
    If the Department upholds these preliminary results in the final 
results, Qingshui will be assigned the cash deposit rate currently 
assigned to Cangshan Qingshui with respect to the subject merchandise 
(i.e., the $3.06 per kilogram cash deposit rate currently assigned to 
Cangshan Qingshui).\11\ If these preliminary results are adopted in the 
final results of this changed circumstances review, we will instruct 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of entries of 
fresh garlic made and exported by Qingshui, effective on the 
publication date of the final results, at the cash deposit rate 
assigned to Cangshan Qingshui.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Fresh Garlic From the People's Republic of China: Final 
Results of the Semiannual Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of 
Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Co., Ltd. and Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable 
Foods Co., Ltd.; 2012-2013, 79 FR 62103, (October 16, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Public Comment

    Interested parties may submit written comments by no later than 30 
days after the date of publication of these preliminary results of 
review in the Federal Register.\12\ Rebuttals, limited to issues raised 
in the written comments, may be filed by no later than five days after 
the written comments are filed.\13\ Parties that submit written 
comments or rebuttals are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) 
A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) 
a table of authorities.\14\ All briefs are to be filed electronically 
using ACCESS.\15\ An electronically filed document must be received 
successfully in its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the 
day on which it is due.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
    \13\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1).
    \14\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) & (d)(2).
    \15\ See 19 CFR 351.303(b) and (f).
    \16\ See 19 CFR 351.303(b)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any interested party may request a hearing to the Assistant 
Secretary of Enforcement and Compliance using ACCESS within 30 days of 
publication of this notice in the Federal Register.\17\ Hearing 
requests should contain the following information: (1) The party's 
name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; 
and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed.\18\ Oral presentations 
will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a 
hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the 
hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
    \18\ See id.
    \19\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the Review

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.216(e), the Department intends to 
issue the final results of this changed circumstances review, not later 
than 270 days after the date on which the review is initiated.

Notification to Parties

    The Department issues and publishes these results in accordance 
with sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216 and 
351.221.

    Dated: March 17, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review
V. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2015-06558 Filed 3-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

15192 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 55 / Monday, March 23, 2015 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE received comments from no other Department of Commerce building. In parties. addition, a complete version of the International Trade Administration Based on this information, the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can Department initiated this CCR on be accessed directly at http:// [A–570–831] October 16, 2014, explaining that while enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. there was sufficient evidence to initiate The signed Preliminary Decision Fresh Garlic From the People’s a changed circumstances review, the Memorandum and the electronic Republic of China: Preliminary Results Department needed to request versions of the Preliminary Decision of the Changed Circumstances Review additional information for this review as Memorandum are identical in content. of Lanling Qingshui Vegetable Foods provided by 19 CFR 351.221(b)(2).4 On October 29, 2014, the Department issued Methodology Co., Ltd. its initial CCR questionnaire to In accordance with section 751(b)(1) AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Qingshui, and Qingshui timely of the Act, we are conducting this International Trade Administration, responded to the Department’s changed circumstances review based Department of Commerce. questionnaire.5 The Department did not upon the information contained in SUMMARY: On October 23, 2014, the receive comments from other interested Qingshui’s submissions.7 In making a Department of Commerce (Department) parties concerning Qingshui’s successor-in-interest determination, the initiated a changed circumstance review questionnaire response. Department typically examines several (CCR) of the antidumping duty (AD) factors including, but not limited to, Scope of the Order order on fresh garlic from the People’s changes in: (1) Management; (2) Republic of China (PRC) in response to The merchandise covered by this production facilities; (3) supplier a request from Lanling Qingshui order is all grades of garlic, whether relationships; and (4) customer base.8 Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd. (Qingshui), a whole or separated into constituent While no single factor or combination of producer/exporter of fresh and peeled cloves. The subject merchandise is factors will necessarily be dispositive, garlic from the People’s Republic of currently classifiable under the the Department generally will consider China (PRC).1 Pursuant to section 751(b) Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the the new company to be the successor to of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended United States (HTSUS) subheadings: the predecessor if the resulting (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.216, the 0703.20.0000, 0703.20.0010, operations of the successor are not Department preliminarily determines 0703.20.0020, 0703.20.0090, materially dissimilar to that of its that Qingshui is the successor-in- 0710.80.7060, 0710.80.9750, predecessor.9 Thus, if the record interest to Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable 0711.90.6000, 0711.90.6500, demonstrates that, with respect to the Foods Co., Ltd. (Cangshan Qingshui). 2005.90.9500, 2005.90.9700, production and sale of the subject We invite interested parties to comment 0703.20.0005, 2005.99.9700 and merchandise, the new company on these preliminary results. 0703.20.0015. Although the HTSUS operates as the same business entity as subheadings are provided for the predecessor company, the DATES: Effective March 23, 2015. convenience and customs purposes, the Department may assign the new FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: written product description is Hilary E. Sadler, Esq., AD/CVD company the cash deposit rate of its dispositive. predecessor.10 For a full description of Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and A complete description of the scope Compliance, International Trade the methodology underlying our of the order is contained in the Administration, U.S. Department of conclusions, see the Preliminary Preliminary Decision Memorandum.6 Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; is a public document and is on file Preliminary Results of the Changed telephone: (202) 482–4340. electronically via Enforcement and Circumstances Review SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Compliance’s Antidumping and Based on the evidence reviewed, we Countervailing Duty Centralized preliminarily determine that Qingshui is Background Electronic Service System (ACCESS). the successor-in-interest to Cangshan On November 16, 1994, the ACCESS is available to registered users Qingshui. Specifically, we find that any Department published the AD order on at http://access.trade.gov, and ACCESS changes that may have occurred after fresh garlic from the PRC in the Federal is available to all parties in the Central ‘‘Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Register.2 On September 4, 2014, Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Co., Ltd’’ became ‘‘Lanling Qingshui Qingshui requested that the Department Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd.’’ did not 4 CCR Initiation Notice. conduct a CCR pursuant to section constitute material changes to 5 See Letter to Qingshui from Mark E. Hoadley, 751(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR management, production facilities, AD/CVD Operations, Program Manager, Office VII, 351.216(b) to determine that it is the Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Fresh Garlic from supplier relationships, customer successor-in-interest to Cangshan the People’s Republic of China: Changed relationships, or ownership/legal Qingshui for purposes of the Order.3 We Circumstances Review—Lanling Qingshui/ Cangshan Qingshui,’’ October 29, 2014 (Qingshui 7 See Qingshui CCR Request and Qingshui CCR CCR Questionnaire); see also Letter from Qingshui 1 See Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of to the Secretary of Commerce, ‘‘Changed Questionnaire Response. China: Initiation of Changed Circumstances Review, Circumstances Determination—Fresh Garlic from 8 See, e.g., Certain Activated Carbon From the 79 FR 63381 (October 23, 2014) (CCR Initiation the People’s Republic of China (Case No. A–570– People’s Republic of China: Notice of Initiation of Notice). 831)—Response to Questionnaire,’’ November 18, Changed Circumstances Review, 74 FR 19934, mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 2 See Antidumping Duty Order: Fresh Garlic from 2014 (Qingshui CCR Questionnaire Response). 19935 (April 30, 2009). the People’s Republic of China, 59 FR 59209 6 See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant 9 See, e.g., Notice of Initiation of Antidumping (November 16, 1994) (Order). Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain 3 See Letter from Qingshui to the Secretary of ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results Forged Stainless Steel Flanges from India, 71 FR Commerce, ‘‘Request for Request for Expedited of the Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances 327, 327 (January 4, 2006). Changed Circumstances Determination—Fresh Review of Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic 10 See, e.g., Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon Garlic from the People’s Republic of China (Case of China: Lanling Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., From Norway; Final Results of Changed No. A–570–831),’’ September 4, 2014 (Qingshui Ltd.,’’ dated concurrently and hereby adopted in Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative CCR Request). this notice. Review, 64 FR 9979, 9980 (March 1, 1999). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Mar 20, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM 23MRN1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 55 / Monday, March 23, 2015 / Notices 15193 structure with respect to the production Oral presentations will be limited to days-at-sea program in support of and sale of the subject merchandise. issues raised in the briefs. If a request research conducted by the National Thus, we preliminarily determine that for a hearing is made, parties will be Fisheries Institute that is investigating Qingshui operates as the same business notified of the time and date for the scallop incidental mortality in the entity as Cangshan Qingshui with hearing to be held at the U.S. scallop dredge fishery. Additionally, the respect to the subject merchandise. A Department of Commerce, 1401 Exempted Fishing Permit would exempt list of topics discussed in the Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, participating vessels from the crew size Preliminary Decision Memorandum DC 20230.19 restriction; mesh size restrictions; appears in the Appendix to this notice. obstruction in gear restrictions; and If the Department upholds these Final Results of the Review possession limits and minimum size preliminary results in the final results, In accordance with 19 CFR requirements for sampling purposes Qingshui will be assigned the cash 351.216(e), the Department intends to only. deposit rate currently assigned to issue the final results of this changed Regulations under the Magnuson- Cangshan Qingshui with respect to the circumstances review, not later than 270 Stevens Fishery Conservation and subject merchandise (i.e., the $3.06 per days after the date on which the review Management Act require publication of kilogram cash deposit rate currently is initiated. this notification to provide interested assigned to Cangshan Qingshui).11 If parties the opportunity to comment on Notification to Parties these preliminary results are adopted in applications for proposed Exempted the final results of this changed The Department issues and publishes Fishing Permits. circumstances review, we will instruct these results in accordance with DATES: Comments must be received on U.S. Customs and Border Protection to sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the or before April 7, 2015. suspend liquidation of entries of fresh Act and 19 CFR 351.216 and 351.221. ADDRESSES: You may submit written garlic made and exported by Qingshui, Dated: March 17, 2015. comments by any of the following effective on the publication date of the Paul Piquado, methods: final results, at the cash deposit rate Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and • Email: nmfs.gar.efp@noaa.gov. assigned to Cangshan Qingshui. Compliance. Include in the subject line ‘‘Comments Public Comment on NFI 2014 Incidental Discard Appendix Mortality EFP.’’ Interested parties may submit written List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary • Mail: John K. Bullard, Regional comments by no later than 30 days after Decision Memorandum Administrator, NMFS, Greater Atlantic the date of publication of these preliminary results of review in the I. Summary Regional Fisheries Office, 55 Great Federal Register.12 Rebuttals, limited to II. Background Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. issues raised in the written comments, III. Scope of the Order Mark the outside of the envelope may be filed by no later than five days IV. Preliminary Results of Changed ‘‘Comments on NFI 2014 Incidental Circumstances Review Discard Mortality EFP.’’ after the written comments are filed.13 V. Recommendation • Fax: (978) 281–9135. Parties that submit written comments or rebuttals are encouraged to submit with [FR Doc. 2015–06558 Filed 3–20–15; 8:45 am] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: each argument: (1) A statement of the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Shannah Jaburek, Fisheries Management issue; (2) a brief summary of the Specialist, 978–282–8456. argument; and (3) a table of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NOAA authorities.14 All briefs are to be filed DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE awarded the National Fisheries Institute electronically using ACCESS.15 An (NFI) a grant through the 2014 Atlantic National Oceanic and Atmospheric electronically filed document must be sea scallop research set-aside program Administration received successfully in its entirety by in support of a project titled, ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on RIN 0648–XD844 ‘‘Determining Incidental Discard the day on which it is due.16 Mortality of Atlantic Sea Scallops, Any interested party may request a Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Placopecten magellanicus, in the hearing to the Assistant Secretary of General Provisions for Domestic Scallop Dredge Fishery in the Mid- Enforcement and Compliance using Fisheries; Application for Exempted Atlantic Bight.’’ NFI submitted a ACCESS within 30 days of publication Fishing Permits complete Exempted Fishing Permit of this notice in the Federal Register.17 AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries (EFP) application on May 13, 2014, but Hearing requests should contain the Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and delayed work on the project until spring following information: (1) The party’s Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), of 2015. NFI is requesting exemptions name, address, and telephone number; Commerce. that would allow one commercial (2) the number of participants; and (3) fishing vessel to fish outside of the ACTION: Notice; request for comments. a list of the issues to be discussed.18 limited access Atlantic sea scallop days- SUMMARY: The Assistant Regional at-sea (DAS) regulations found at 50 11 See Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of Administrator for Sustainable Fisheries, CFR 648.53(b); mesh size restrictions at China: Final Results of the Semiannual § 648.51(a)(2); obstruction in dredge Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Jinxiang Greater Atlantic Region, NMFS, has Merry Vegetable Co., Ltd. and Cangshan Qingshui made a preliminary determination that gear restrictions at § 648.51(b)(4)(iii); mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd.; 2012–2013, 79 FR 62103, an Exempted Fishing Permit application and the crew size regulations at (October 16, 2014). contains all of the required information § 648.51(c). In addition, the EFP would 12 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 13 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1). and warrants further consideration. This temporarily exempt the participating 14 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) & (d)(2). Exempted Fishing Permit would allow vessel from possession limits and 15 See 19 CFR 351.303(b) and (f). one commercial fishing vessel to fish minimum size requirements specified in 16 See 19 CFR 351.303(b) outside of the limited access scallop 50 CFR part 648, subsections B and D 17 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). through O, for sampling purposes only. 18 See id. 19 See 19 CFR 351.310(d). Any fishing activity conducted outside VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Mar 20, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM 23MRN1


Document Created: 2018-02-21 09:47:37
Document Modified: 2018-02-21 09:47:37
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesEffective March 23, 2015.
ContactHilary E. Sadler, Esq., AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 4340.
FR Citation80 FR 15192 
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR