80 FR 15515 - Revocation of Significant New Uses of Metal Salts of Complex Inorganic Oxyacids

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 56 (March 24, 2015)

Page Range		15515-15517
FR Document		2015-06474

EPA is revoking the significant new use rule (SNUR) promulgated under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for two chemical substances that were identified generically as metal salts of complex inorganic oxyacids, which were the subject of premanufacture notices (PMNs) P-89-576 and P-89-577. EPA issued a SNUR based on a TSCA section 5(e) consent order designating certain activities as significant new uses. EPA has received test data for the chemical substances and is revoking the SNUR.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 56 (Tuesday, March 24, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 56 (Tuesday, March 24, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15515-15517]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06474]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 721

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2014-0702; FRL-9924-09]
RIN 2070-AB27


Revocation of Significant New Uses of Metal Salts of Complex 
Inorganic Oxyacids

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is revoking the significant new use rule (SNUR) 
promulgated under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act 
(TSCA) for two chemical substances that were identified generically as 
metal salts of complex inorganic oxyacids, which were the subject of 
premanufacture notices (PMNs) P-89-576 and P-89-577. EPA issued a SNUR 
based on a TSCA section 5(e) consent order designating certain 
activities as significant new uses. EPA has received test data for the 
chemical substances and is revoking the SNUR.

DATES: This final rule is effective May 26, 2015.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2014-0702, is available at 
http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pollution Prevention and 
Toxics Docket (OPPT Docket), Environmental Protection Agency Docket 
Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open 
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal 
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 
566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket is (202) 566-
0280. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information 
about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact: Jim 
Alwood, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and 
Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: 202 564-8974; email 
address: [email protected].
    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202) 
554-1404; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you manufacture 
(including import), process, or use the chemical substances contained 
in this rule. Potentially affected entities may include, but are not 
limited to:
     Manufacturers or processors of the chemical substances 
(NAICS codes 325 and 324110), e.g., chemical manufacturing and 
petroleum refineries.
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides 
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this 
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be 
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) 
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining 
whether this action might apply to certain entities. To determine 
whether you or your business may be affected by this action, you should 
carefully examine the applicability provisions in Sec.  721.5. If you 
have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a 
particular entity, consult the technical person listed under FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    This action may also affect certain entities through pre-existing 
import certification and export notification rules under TSCA. Chemical 
importers are subject to the TSCA section 13 (15 U.S.C. 2612) import 
certification requirements promulgated at 19 CFR 12.118 through 12.127 
and 19 CFR 127.28. Chemical importers must certify that the shipment of 
the chemical substance complies with all applicable rules and orders 
under TSCA. Importers of chemicals subject to a SNUR must certify their 
compliance with the SNUR requirements. The EPA policy in support of 
import certification appears at 40 CFR part 707, subpart B. Importers

[[Page 15516]]

of the chemical, the subject of this action, would no longer be 
required to certify compliance with the SNUR requirements if the 
revocation becomes effective. In addition, if this proposed SNUR 
revocation becomes effective, persons who export or intend to export 
the chemical that is the subject of this action would no longer be 
subject to the TSCA section 12(b)(15 U.S.C. 2611(b) export notification 
requirements at 40 CFR part 707, that are currently triggered by the 
SNUR.

II. Background

A. What action is the Agency taking?

    In the Federal Register of December 17, 2014 (79 FR 75111) (FRL-
9919-93), EPA proposed a revocation of the SNUR at 40 CFR 721.4680 for 
the chemical substances identified generically as metal salts of 
complex inorganic oxyacids (PMNs P-89-576 and P-89-577). This SNUR 
designated certain activities as significant new uses based on a TSCA 
section 5(e) consent order for the PMNs that was issued under TSCA 
sections 5(e)(1)(A)(i), and 5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(II) based on a finding that 
the substances may be produced in substantial quantities and there may 
be significant (or substantial) human exposure to the substances. 
Subsequently, a manufacturer of the PMN substances petitioned EPA to 
revoke the SNUR based on the results of the submitted acute dermal 
study, a 28-day oral toxicity study, and mutagenicity study for P-89-
576. Based on the results of the testing, EPA determined that both 
substances have inherently low toxicity. EPA received one comment to 
the proposed SNUR revocation supporting the finding that the PMN 
substances have low toxicity. EPA is now revoking the SNUR pursuant to 
40 CFR 721.185.

B. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?

    Upon conclusion of the review for P-89-576 and P-89-577 in 1990, 
EPA designated certain activities as significant new uses based on a 
TSCA section 5(e) consent order for the PMNs that was issued under TSCA 
sections 5(e)(1)(A)(i), and 5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(II) based on a finding that 
the substances may be produced in substantial quantities and there may 
be significant (or substantial) human exposure to the substances. Under 
Sec.  721.185, EPA may at any time revoke a SNUR for a chemical 
substance which has been added to subpart E of 40 CFR part 721 if EPA 
makes one of the determinations set forth in Sec.  721.185(a)(1) 
through (a)(6). Revocation may occur on EPA's initiative or in response 
to a written request. Under Sec.  721.185(b)(3), if EPA concludes that 
a SNUR should be revoked, the Agency will propose the changes in the 
Federal Register, briefly describe the grounds for the action, and 
provide interested parties an opportunity to comment.
    EPA has determined that the criteria set forth in Sec.  
721.185(a)(6) have been satisfied for the chemical substances, proposed 
the SNUR revocation, and received a public comment supporting the SNUR 
revocation; therefore, EPA is revoking the SNUR for these chemical 
substances. The significant new use notification and the recordkeeping 
requirements at 40 CFR 721.4680 will terminate when the SNUR revocation 
becomes effective. In addition, export notification under TSCA section 
12(b) and 40 CFR part 707, subpart D triggered by the SNUR will no 
longer be required.

 III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This rule will revoke or eliminate an existing regulatory 
requirement and does not contain any new or amended requirements. As 
such, the Agency has determined that this SNUR revocation would not 
have any adverse impacts, economic or otherwise.
    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types 
of regulatory actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled 
Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). This 
rule does not contain any information collections subject to approval 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), (44 U.S.C.3501 et seq.). Since 
this rule eliminates a reporting requirement, the Agency certifies 
pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), that this SNUR revocation will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    For the same reasons, this action does not require any action under 
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 
104-4). This rule has neither Federalism implications, because it will 
not have substantial direct effects on States, on the relationship 
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, 
as specified in Executive Order 13132 entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, 
August 10, 1999), nor Tribal implications, because it will not have 
substantial direct effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the 
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on 
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian Tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175 
entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments 
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 entitled 
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks 
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because this is not an economically 
significant regulatory action as defined under Executive Order 12866, 
and it does not address environmental health or safety risks 
disproportionately affecting children. This action is not subject to 
Executive Order 1311, entitled Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, 
May 22, 2001), because this action is not expected to affect energy 
supply, distribution, or use. Because this action does not involve any 
technical standards, section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer 
and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) 
(15 U.S.C. 272 note), does not apply to this action. This action does 
not involve special considerations of environmental justice related 
issues as required by Executive Order 12898 entitled Federal Actions to 
Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income 
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

IV. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), 
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required 
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and 
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of 
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' 
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721

    Environmental protection, Chemicals, Hazardous substances, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: March 12, 2015.
Maria J. Doa,
Director, Chemical Control Division.

    Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 721--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 721 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and 2625(c).

[[Page 15517]]

Sec.  721.4680  [Removed]

0
2. Remove Sec.  721.4680.

[FR Doc. 2015-06474 Filed 3-23-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

15516 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 56 / Tuesday, March 24, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

of the chemical, the subject of this initiative or in response to a written Government and Indian Tribes, or on
action, would no longer be required to request. Under § 721.185(b)(3), if EPA the distribution of power and
certify compliance with the SNUR concludes that a SNUR should be responsibilities between the Federal
requirements if the revocation becomes revoked, the Agency will propose the Government and Indian Tribes, as
effective. In addition, if this proposed changes in the Federal Register, briefly specified in Executive Order 13175
SNUR revocation becomes effective, describe the grounds for the action, and entitled Consultation and Coordination
persons who export or intend to export provide interested parties an with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
the chemical that is the subject of this opportunity to comment. 67249, November 9, 2000).
action would no longer be subject to the EPA has determined that the criteria This action is not subject to Executive
TSCA section 12(b)(15 U.S.C. 2611(b) set forth in § 721.185(a)(6) have been Order 13045 entitled Protection of
export notification requirements at 40 satisfied for the chemical substances, Children from Environmental Health
CFR part 707, that are currently proposed the SNUR revocation, and Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885,
triggered by the SNUR. received a public comment supporting April 23, 1997), because this is not an
the SNUR revocation; therefore, EPA is economically significant regulatory
II. Background revoking the SNUR for these chemical action as defined under Executive Order
A. What action is the Agency taking? substances. The significant new use 12866, and it does not address
notification and the recordkeeping environmental health or safety risks
In the Federal Register of December requirements at 40 CFR 721.4680 will
17, 2014 (79 FR 75111) (FRL-9919-93), disproportionately affecting children.
terminate when the SNUR revocation This action is not subject to Executive
EPA proposed a revocation of the SNUR becomes effective. In addition, export
at 40 CFR 721.4680 for the chemical Order 1311, entitled Actions Concerning
notification under TSCA section 12(b) Regulations That Significantly Affect
substances identified generically as and 40 CFR part 707, subpart D
metal salts of complex inorganic Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66
triggered by the SNUR will no longer be FR 28355, May 22, 2001), because this
oxyacids (PMNs P-89-576 and P-89- required.
577). This SNUR designated certain action is not expected to affect energy
activities as significant new uses based III. Statutory and Executive Order supply, distribution, or use. Because
on a TSCA section 5(e) consent order for Reviews this action does not involve any
the PMNs that was issued under TSCA technical standards, section 12(d) of the
This rule will revoke or eliminate an National Technology Transfer and
sections 5(e)(1)(A)(i), and existing regulatory requirement and
5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(II) based on a finding that Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA),
does not contain any new or amended Public Law 104–113, section 12(d) (15
the substances may be produced in requirements. As such, the Agency has
substantial quantities and there may be U.S.C. 272 note), does not apply to this
determined that this SNUR revocation
significant (or substantial) human action. This action does not involve
would not have any adverse impacts,
exposure to the substances. special considerations of environmental
economic or otherwise.
Subsequently, a manufacturer of the The Office of Management and Budget justice related issues as required by
PMN substances petitioned EPA to (OMB) has exempted these types of Executive Order 12898 entitled Federal
revoke the SNUR based on the results of regulatory actions from review under Actions to Address Environmental
the submitted acute dermal study, a 28- Executive Order 12866, entitled Justice in Minority Populations and
day oral toxicity study, and Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629,
mutagenicity study for P-89-576. Based 51735, October 4, 1993). This rule does February 16, 1994).
on the results of the testing, EPA not contain any information collections IV. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
determined that both substances have subject to approval under the Paperwork
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
inherently low toxicity. EPA received Reduction Act (PRA), (44 U.S.C.3501 et
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
one comment to the proposed SNUR seq.). Since this rule eliminates a
submit a report containing this rule and
revocation supporting the finding that reporting requirement, the Agency
other required information to the U.S.
the PMN substances have low toxicity. certifies pursuant to section 605(b) of
Senate, the U.S. House of
EPA is now revoking the SNUR the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
Representatives, and the Comptroller
pursuant to 40 CFR 721.185. U.S.C. 601 et seq.), that this SNUR
General of the United States prior to
revocation will not have a significant
B. What is the Agency’s authority for publication of the rule in the Federal
economic impact on a substantial
taking this action? Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
number of small entities.
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Upon conclusion of the review for For the same reasons, this action does
P-89-576 and P-89-577 in 1990, EPA not require any action under Title II of List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721
designated certain activities as the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of Environmental protection, Chemicals,
significant new uses based on a TSCA 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104–4). This rule Hazardous substances, Reporting and
section 5(e) consent order for the PMNs has neither Federalism implications, recordkeeping requirements.
that was issued under TSCA sections because it will not have substantial
5(e)(1)(A)(i), and 5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(II) based direct effects on States, on the Dated: March 12, 2015.
on a finding that the substances may be relationship between the national Maria J. Doa,
produced in substantial quantities and government and the States, or on the Director, Chemical Control Division.
there may be significant (or substantial) distribution of power and Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
human exposure to the substances. responsibilities among the various amended as follows:
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES

Under § 721.185, EPA may at any time levels of government, as specified in
revoke a SNUR for a chemical substance Executive Order 13132 entitled PART 721—[AMENDED]
which has been added to subpart E of Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
40 CFR part 721 if EPA makes one of the 1999), nor Tribal implications, because ■ 1. The authority citation for part 721
determinations set forth in it will not have substantial direct effects continues to read as follows:
§ 721.185(a)(1) through (a)(6). on one or more Indian Tribes, on the Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and
Revocation may occur on EPA’s relationship between the Federal 2625(c).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:15 Mar 23, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM 24MRR1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 56 / Tuesday, March 24, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 15517

§ 721.4680 [Removed] maintaining strong national security and ‘‘Work-for-Others’’ to ‘‘Strategic
■ 2. Remove § 721.4680. promoting economic competitiveness. Partnership Projects’’.
To better convey the importance of 14. Section 970.5232–6, is revised to
[FR Doc. 2015–06474 Filed 3–23–15; 8:45 am]
projects that the laboratories perform for change the term ‘‘Work for Others’’ to
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
other entities, DOE has decided to ‘‘Strategic Partnership Projects’’.
change the term ‘‘Work for Others 15. Section 970.5235–1, paragraph (c),
(WFO) to ‘‘Strategic Partnership Projects is revised to change the term ‘‘Work for
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (SPP)’’. The national laboratories/ Others’’ to ‘‘Strategic Partnership
plants/sites and DOE programs assisted Projects’’ and change the number and
48 CFR Part 970 title for DOE Order 481.1 in paragraph
in determining the new name. This
RIN 1991–AC07 change will take place immediately and (d).
will be implemented throughout DOE III. Procedural Requirements
Acquisition Regulation: Technical and and its contractor community in the
Administrative Changes to Department coming months. None of these changes A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
of Energy Acquisition Regulation are substantive or of a nature to cause and 13563
AGENCY:Department of Energy. any significant expense for DOE or its This regulatory action has been
contractors. determined not to be a ‘‘significant
Final rule; technical
ACTION:
amendment. II. Section-by-Section Analysis regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy DOE amends the DEAR as follows: Review,’’ 58 FR 51735 (October 4, 1993).
(DOE) is amending the Department of PART 970–DOE MANAGEMENT
Accordingly, this final rule is not
Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) AND OPERATING CONTRACTS
subject to review under that Executive
to make technical and administrative 1. Section 970.1707, is revised to
Order by the Office of Information and
changes to the DEAR by changing the change the term ‘‘Work for Others’’ to
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) of the Office
term ‘‘Work for Others’’ to ‘‘Strategic ‘‘Strategic Partnership Projects’’.
2. Section 970.1707–1, is revised to of Management and Budget (OMB).
Partnership Projects’’ and ‘‘WFO’’ to DOE has also reviewed this regulation
change the term ‘‘Work for Others’’ to
‘‘SPP’’ in every instance where it pursuant to Executive Order 13563,
‘‘Strategic Partnership Projects’’ and
appears in the DEAR. This final rule issued on January 18, 2011 (76 FR 3281
change the title for DOE Order 481.1C.
does not alter substantive rights or (Jan. 21, 2011)). Executive Order 13563
3. Section 970.1707–2, is revised to
obligations under current law. is supplemental to and explicitly
change the term ‘‘Work for Others’’ to
DATES: Effective date: April 23, 2015. ‘‘Strategic Partnership Projects’’. reaffirms the principles, structures, and
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 4. Section 970.1707–3, is revised to definitions governing regulatory review
Lawrence Butler, (202) 287–1945 or change the term ‘‘work for others’’ to established in Executive Order 12866.
lawrence.butler@hq.doe.gov. ‘‘Strategic Partnership Projects’’ in both To the extent permitted by law, agencies
the title and paragraph (a). are required by Executive Order 13563
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background 5. Section 970.1707–4, is revised to to: (1) Propose or adopt a regulation
II. Section-by-Section Analysis change the term ‘‘Work for Others’’ to only upon a reasoned determination
III. Procedural Requirements ‘‘Strategic Partnership Projects’’. that its benefits justify its costs
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866 6. Section 970.3270, paragraph (a)(6), (recognizing that some benefits and
and 13563. is revised to change the term ‘‘Work for costs are difficult to quantify); (2) tailor
B. Review Under Executive Order 12988. others’’ to ‘‘Strategic Partnership regulations to impose the least burden
C. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility on society, consistent with obtaining
Act.
Projects’’.
7. Section 970.3501–2, is revised to regulatory objectives, taking into
D. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction
change the number and title for DOE account, among other things, and to the
Act.
E. Review Under the National Order 481.1. extent practicable, the costs of
Environmental Policy Act. 8. Section 970.5217–1, is revised to cumulative regulations; (3) select, in
F. Review Under Executive Order 13132. change the clause title and date, and choosing among alternative regulatory
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates change the term ‘‘Work for Others’’ to approaches, those approaches that
Reform Act of 1995. ‘‘Strategic Partnership Projects’’ maximize net benefits (including
H. Review Under the Treasury and General throughout the clause. potential economic, environmental,
Government Appropriations Act, 1999. 9. Section 970.5227–1, paragraph public health and safety, and other
I. Review Under Executive Order 13211. advantages; distributive impacts; and
(b)(ii), is revised to change the term
J. Review Under the Treasury and General
‘‘Work for Others’’ to ‘‘Strategic equity); (4) to the extent feasible, specify
Government Appropriations Act, 2001.
K. Administrative Procedure Act Partnership Projects’’. performance objectives, rather than
L. Congressional Notification 10. Section 970.5227–2, paragraph specifying the behavior or manner of
M. Approval by the Office of the Secretary (b)(1)(ii), is revised to change the term compliance that regulated entities must
of Energy. ‘‘Work for Others’’ to ‘‘Strategic adopt; and (5) identify and assess
Partnership Projects’’. available alternatives to direct
I. Background regulation, including providing
11. Section 970.5227–3, is revised to
Since July 1991, DOE has officially change the term ‘‘Work for Others’’ to economic incentives to encourage the
used the term ‘‘Work for Others’’ to ‘‘Strategic Partnership Projects’’ and desired behavior, such as user fees or
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES

describe work performed by its national ‘‘WFO’’ to ‘‘SPP’’ throughout the clause. marketable permits, or providing
laboratories for non-DOE entities, 12. Section 970.5227–11, paragraph information upon which choices can be
including other Federal agencies, (c)(2)(viii), is revised to change the term made by the public.
universities, and the private sector. ‘‘Work-for-Others’’ to ‘‘Strategic DOE emphasizes as well that
Projects performed under the Work for Partnership Projects’’. Executive Order 13563 requires agencies
Others program provide solutions to 13. Section 970.5227–12, paragraph to use the best available techniques to
difficult technical challenges vital to (c)(1)(viii), is revised to change the term quantify anticipated present and future

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:15 Mar 23, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM 24MRR1

Document Created: 2015-12-18 11:44:36
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 11:44:36

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Final rule.
Dates		This final rule is effective May 26, 2015.
Contact		For technical information contact: Jim Alwood, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: 202 564-8974; email
FR Citation		80 FR 15515
RIN Number		2070-AB27