80 FR 17000 - Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 61 (March 31, 2015)

Page Range		17000-17003
FR Document		2015-07172
We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Airbus Model A330-200, -200 Freighter, and -300 series airplanes; and all Airbus Model A340-200, -300, -500, and -600 series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of cracks at certain frames of the forward cargo door. This proposed AD would require a detailed inspection for cracking of certain forward cargo doors, and repair if necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct cracking at certain frames, which could result in the loss of structural integrity of the forward cargo door.
Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 61 (Tuesday, March 31, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 61 (Tuesday, March 31, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17000-17003]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07172]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2015-0675; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-213-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for 
certain Airbus Model A330-200, -200 Freighter, and -300 series 
airplanes; and all Airbus Model A340-200, -300, -500, and -600 series 
airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of cracks at 
certain frames of the forward cargo door. This proposed AD would 
require a detailed inspection for cracking of certain forward cargo 
doors, and repair if necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect and 
correct cracking at certain frames, which could result in the loss of 
structural integrity of the forward cargo door.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 15, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: 202-493-2251.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact 
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 
93 45 80; email [email protected]; Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the 
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. 
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 
425-227-1221.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
0675; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket 
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments 
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket 
Operations office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. 
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, 
International Branch, ANM-116,

[[Page 17001]]

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 
98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1138; fax 425-227-1149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or 
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address 
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2015-0675; 
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-213-AD'' at the beginning of your 
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, 
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We 
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend 
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We 
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we 
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical 
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA 
Airworthiness Directive 2014-0228, dated October 20, 2014 (referred to 
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or 
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for certain Airbus Model 
A330-200, -200 Freighter, and -300 series airplanes; and all Airbus 
Model A340-200, -300, -500, and -600 series airplanes. The MCAI states:

    An A330 aeroplane operator reported recently cases of crack 
findings on two different aeroplanes, at frame 20A and at frame 20B 
close to beam 3 of the forward cargo door. The first finding was 
detected during scheduled maintenance, while the second one was 
found during an inspection prompted by the first finding. Subsequent 
analyses of these cracks identified that the first crack initiated 
at frame 20B, which is the first primary load path, leading to 
excessive loads at frame 20A and consequent cracking. Nevertheless, 
on the other aeroplane, a crack was detected on frame 20A only. 
Rupture of both frames 20A and 20B could lead to frame 21 failure 
after a limited number of flight cycles (FC).
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, may potentially 
result in the loss of structural integrity of the forward cargo 
door, which could ultimately jeopardise the aeroplane's safe flight.
    Prompted by these findings, Airbus issued Alert Operators 
Transmission (AOT) A52L010-14 to provide instructions for a one-time 
inspection of frames 20A, 20B and 21 in the area of beam 3, until 
the half pitch between beam 2 and beam 3.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires 
identification of the Part Number (P/N) of the affected forward 
cargo doors, a one-time detailed inspection (DET) of each affected 
door and, depending on findings, accomplishment of applicable 
corrective action(s) [contacting Airbus].
    This [EASA] AD is considered to be an interim action and further 
AD action may follow.

    Required actions also include sending inspection results to Airbus. 
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
0675.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Airbus has issued Alert Operators Transmission (AOT) A52L010-14, 
dated September 30, 2014. The service information describes procedures 
for an inspection for cracking of certain forward cargo doors, and 
repair if necessary. The actions described in this AOT are intended to 
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI. This service 
information is reasonably available; see ADDRESSES for ways to access 
this service information.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another 
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant 
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have 
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service 
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we 
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition 
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of these 
same type designs.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 89 airplanes of U.S. 
registry.
    We also estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour per product 
to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average 
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost $0 per 
product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this proposed 
AD on U.S. operators to be $7,565, or $85 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would 
take about 32 work-hours and require parts costing $654,850, for a cost 
of $657,570 per product. We have no way of determining the number of 
aircraft that might need this action.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for 
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the 
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of 
information displays a current valid OMB control number. The control 
number for the collection of information required by this proposed AD 
is 2120-0056. The paperwork cost associated with this proposed AD has 
been detailed in the Costs of Compliance section of this document and 
includes time for reviewing instructions, as well as completing and 
reviewing the collection of information. Therefore, all reporting 
associated with this proposed AD is mandatory. Comments concerning the 
accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should 
be directed to the FAA at 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 
20591, ATTN: Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation 
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's 
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not 
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship 
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed 
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 
12866;

[[Page 17002]]

    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies 
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive (AD):

Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2015-0675; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-
213-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by May 15, 2015.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1) 
and (c)(2) of this AD, certificated in any category.
    (1) Airbus Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -223F, -243, -243F, 
-301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343 airplanes, 
all manufacturer serial numbers, except those on which Airbus 
Modification 202702 has been embodied in production.
    (2) Airbus Model A340-211, -212, -213, -311, -312, -313, -541, 
and -642 airplanes, all manufacturer serial numbers.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 52, Doors.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of cracks at certain frames of 
the forward cargo door. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct 
cracking at certain frames, which could result in the loss of 
structural integrity of the forward cargo door.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

(g) Inspection and Repair

    (1) Within 200 flight cycles after the effective date of this 
AD, do a detailed inspection for cracking of an affected forward 
cargo door, having a part number identified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) 
through (g)(1)(xii) of this AD, at frames 20A, 20B, and 21 areas 
located above beam 3, from outside and inside, in accordance with 
Airbus Alert Operators Transmission (AOT) A52L010-14, dated 
September 30, 2014.
    (i) F523-70500-000.
    (ii) F523-70550-004.
    (iii) F523-70500-006.
    (iv) F523-70500-008.
    (v) F523-70500-010.
    (vi) F523-70500-012.
    (vii) F523-70500-014.
    (viii) F523-70550-000.
    (ix) F523-70550-002.
    (x) F523-70500-004.
    (xi) F523-70550-008.
    (xii) F523-70550-050.
    (2) If any crack is found during the inspection required by 
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, before further flight, repair using a 
method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, 
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety 
Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA).

(h) Definition of Detailed Inspection

    For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is an 
intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or assembly 
to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is 
normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at an 
intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as a mirror, 
magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning and 
elaborate procedures may be required.

(i) Reporting Requirement

    Submit a report of the findings (both positive and negative) of 
the inspection required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD to Serge 
KIYMAZ, Structure Engineer, Structure Engineering--SEES1 CUSTOMER 
SERVICES, Phone: +33(0)5 82 05 10 33, Fax: +33(0)5 61 93 36 14, 
email: [email protected], at the applicable time specified in 
paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2) of this AD. The report must include the 
information identified in Airbus AOT A52L010-14, dated September 30, 
2014.
    (1) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of 
this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the inspection.
    (2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this 
AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the effective date of 
this AD.

(j) Parts Installation Limitation

    As of the effective date of this AD, installing a forward cargo 
door having any part number specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) 
through (g)(1)(xii) of this AD is permitted on any airplane, 
provided that prior to installation, the door is inspected and, 
depending on the findings, corrected, in accordance with Airbus AOT 
A52L010-14, dated September 30, 2014.

(k) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, 
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using 
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight 
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information 
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Vladimir 
Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, 
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 
WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1138; fax 425- 227-1149. 
Information may be emailed to: [email protected]. 
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal 
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the 
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district 
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this 
AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD 
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be 
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International 
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the EASA; 
or Airbus's EASA DOA. If approved by the DOA, the approval must 
include the DOA-authorized signature.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: A federal agency may not conduct or 
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a 
person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a 
collection of information subject to the requirements of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information 
displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number 
for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for 
this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 5 
minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, 
completing and reviewing the collection of information. All 
responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments 
concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing 
the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. 
SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance 
Officer, AES-200.

(l) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information 
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2014-0228, dated October 20, 
2014, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD 
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching 
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-0675.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact 
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice 
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; 
fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email [email protected]; 
Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may

[[Page 17003]]

view this service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane 
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on 
the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 19, 2015.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-07172 Filed 3-30-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
17000 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 61 / Tuesday, March 31, 2015 / Proposed Rules

some additional costs on handlers, the 2015, and the order requires that the and –600 series airplanes. This
costs are minimal and uniform on all rate of assessment for each fiscal period proposed AD was prompted by reports
handlers. Some of the additional costs apply to all assessable grapes handled of cracks at certain frames of the
may be passed on to producers. during such fiscal period; (2) the forward cargo door. This proposed AD
However, these costs would be offset by Committee needs to have sufficient would require a detailed inspection for
the benefits derived from the operation funds to pay its expenses, which are cracking of certain forward cargo doors,
of the marketing order. In addition, the incurred on a continuous basis; and (3) and repair if necessary. We are
Executive Subcommittee and the handlers are aware of this action, which proposing this AD to detect and correct
Committee’s meetings were widely was unanimously recommended by the cracking at certain frames, which could
publicized throughout the grape Committee at a public meeting and is result in the loss of structural integrity
production area and all interested similar to other assessment rate actions of the forward cargo door.
persons were invited to attend and issued in past years. DATES: We must receive comments on
participate in Committee deliberations this proposed AD by May 15, 2015.
on all issues. Like all Committee List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 925
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
meetings, the October 30, 2014, meeting Grapes, Marketing agreements, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
was a public meeting and all entities, Reporting and recordkeeping 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
both large and small, were able to requirements. methods:
express views on this issue. Finally, For the reasons set forth in the • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
interested persons are invited to submit preamble, 7 CFR part 925 is proposed to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
comments on this proposed rule, be amended as follows: instructions for submitting comments.
including the regulatory and • Fax: 202–493–2251.
informational impacts of this action on PART 925—GRAPES GROWN IN A • Mail: U.S. Department of
small businesses. DESIGNATED AREA OF Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
In accordance with the Paperwork SOUTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Chapter 35), the order’s information ■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
Washington, DC 20590.
collection requirements have been part 925 continues to read as follows:
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
previously approved by the Office of Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
Management and Budget (OMB) and
■ 2. Section 925.215 is revised to read 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189. No
changes in those requirements as a as follows: W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
result of this action are necessary. Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
§ 925.215 Assessment rate. p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Should any changes become necessary,
they would be submitted to OMB for On and after January 1, 2015, an Federal holidays.
approval. assessment rate of $0.0250 per 18-pound For service information identified in
This proposed rule would impose no lug is established for grapes grown in a this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS,
additional reporting or recordkeeping designated area of southeastern Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1 Rond
requirements on either small or large California. Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
California grape handlers. As with all Dated: March 26, 2015. Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
Federal marketing order programs, Rex A. Barnes,
96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
reports and forms are periodically airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com;
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
reviewed to reduce information Marketing Service.
Internet http://www.airbus.com. You
requirements and duplication by may view this referenced service
[FR Doc. 2015–07370 Filed 3–30–15; 8:45 am]
industry and public sector agencies. information at the FAA, Transport
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
AMS is committed to complying with Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
the E-Government Act, to promote the SW., Renton, WA. For information on
use of the internet and other the availability of this material at the
information technologies to provide DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAA, call 425–227–1221.
increased opportunities for citizen Federal Aviation Administration Examining the AD Docket
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes. You may examine the AD docket on
14 CFR Part 39 the Internet at http://
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or [Docket No. FAA–2015–0675; Directorate www.regulations.gov by searching for
conflict with this action. Identifier 2014–NM–213–AD] and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
A small business guide on complying 0675; or in person at the Docket
RIN 2120–AA64 Management Facility between 9 a.m.
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus except Federal holidays. The AD docket
be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/ Airplanes
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. contains this proposed AD, the
Any questions about the compliance AGENCY: Federal Aviation regulatory evaluation, any comments
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

guide should be sent to Jeffrey Smutny Administration (FAA), DOT. received, and other information. The
at the previously-mentioned address in ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
street address for the Docket Operations
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT (NPRM). office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
section. the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
A 15-day comment period is provided SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new be available in the AD docket shortly
to allow interested persons to respond airworthiness directive (AD) for certain after receipt.
to this proposed rule. Fifteen days is Airbus Model A330–200, –200 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
deemed appropriate because: (1) The Freighter, and –300 series airplanes; and Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
2015 fiscal period began on January 1, all Airbus Model A340–200, –300, –500, International Branch, ANM–116,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:18 Mar 30, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\31MRP1.SGM 31MRP1
17002 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 61 / Tuesday, March 31, 2015 / Proposed Rules

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the (g) Inspection and Repair (k) Other FAA AD Provisions
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (1) Within 200 flight cycles after the The following provisions also apply to this
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); effective date of this AD, do a detailed AD:
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in inspection for cracking of an affected forward (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
Alaska; and cargo door, having a part number identified (AMOCs): The Manager, International
4. Will not have a significant in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(xii) of Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
economic impact, positive or negative, this AD, at frames 20A, 20B, and 21 areas Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
located above beam 3, from outside and approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
on a substantial number of small entities using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
inside, in accordance with Airbus Alert
under the criteria of the Regulatory In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
Operators Transmission (AOT) A52L010–14,
Flexibility Act. dated September 30, 2014. request to your principal inspector or local
(i) F523–70500–000. Flight Standards District Office, as
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 appropriate. If sending information directly
(ii) F523–70550–004.
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation (iii) F523–70500–006. to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
safety, Incorporation by reference, (iv) F523–70500–008. Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
Safety. (v) F523–70500–010. International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
(vi) F523–70500–012. Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
The Proposed Amendment (vii) F523–70500–014. Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–1138; fax 425- 227–1149.
Accordingly, under the authority (viii) F523–70550–000.
Information may be emailed to: 9–ANM–116–
delegated to me by the Administrator, (ix) F523–70550–002.
AMOC–REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part (x) F523–70500–004.
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
39 as follows: (xi) F523–70550–008.
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
(xii) F523–70550–050.
inspector, the manager of the local flight
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS (2) If any crack is found during the
standards district office/certificate holding
DIRECTIVES inspection required by paragraph (g)(1) of district office. The AMOC approval letter
this AD, before further flight, repair using a must specifically reference this AD.
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 method approved by the Manager, (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
continues to read as follows: International Branch, ANM–116, Transport requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European actions from a manufacturer, the action must
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus’s be accomplished using a method approved
EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
§ 39.13 [Amended]
(h) Definition of Detailed Inspection 116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the EASA; or Airbus’s EASA DOA. If
the following new airworthiness For the purposes of this AD, a detailed approved by the DOA, the approval must
directive (AD): inspection is an intensive examination of a include the DOA-authorized signature.
specific item, installation, or assembly to (3) Reporting Requirements: A federal
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2015–0675; detect damage, failure, or irregularity.
Directorate Identifier 2014–NM–213–AD. agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
Available lighting is normally supplemented person is not required to respond to, nor
(a) Comments Due Date with a direct source of good lighting at an shall a person be subject to a penalty for
intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection failure to comply with a collection of
We must receive comments by May 15, aids such as a mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., information subject to the requirements of
2015. may be necessary. Surface cleaning and the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
(b) Affected ADs elaborate procedures may be required. collection of information displays a current
None. (i) Reporting Requirement valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information
(c) Applicability Submit a report of the findings (both collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for
positive and negative) of the inspection this collection of information is estimated to
This AD applies to the airplanes identified
required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD to be approximately 5 minutes per response,
in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD,
Serge KIYMAZ, Structure Engineer, Structure including the time for reviewing instructions,
certificated in any category.
Engineering—SEES1 CUSTOMER SERVICES, completing and reviewing the collection of
(1) Airbus Model A330–201, –202, –203,
Phone: +33(0)5 82 05 10 33, Fax: +33(0)5 61 information. All responses to this collection
–223, –223F, –243, –243F, –301, –302, –303,
93 36 14, email: serge.kiymaz@airbus.com, at of information are mandatory. Comments
–321, –322, –323, –341, –342, and –343
the applicable time specified in paragraph concerning the accuracy of this burden and
airplanes, all manufacturer serial numbers,
(i)(1) or (i)(2) of this AD. The report must suggestions for reducing the burden should
except those on which Airbus Modification
include the information identified in Airbus be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence
202702 has been embodied in production.
(2) Airbus Model A340–211, –212, –213, AOT A52L010–14, dated September 30, Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
–311, –312, –313, –541, and –642 airplanes, 2014. Information Collection Clearance Officer,
all manufacturer serial numbers. (1) If the inspection was done on or after AES–200.
the effective date of this AD: Submit the
(d) Subject report within 30 days after the inspection. (l) Related Information
Air Transport Association (ATA) of (2) If the inspection was done before the (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
America Code 52, Doors. effective date of this AD: Submit the report Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
within 30 days after the effective date of this Airworthiness Directive 2014–0228, dated
(e) Reason AD. October 20, 2014, for related information.
This AD was prompted by reports of cracks This MCAI may be found in the AD docket
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

(j) Parts Installation Limitation on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
at certain frames of the forward cargo door.
We are issuing this AD to detect and correct As of the effective date of this AD, by searching for and locating Docket No.
cracking at certain frames, which could result installing a forward cargo door having any FAA–2015–0675.
in the loss of structural integrity of the part number specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) (2) For service information identified in
forward cargo door. through (g)(1)(xii) of this AD is permitted on this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness
any airplane, provided that prior to Office—EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
(f) Compliance installation, the door is inspected and, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33
Comply with this AD within the depending on the findings, corrected, in 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
compliance times specified, unless already accordance with Airbus AOT A52L010–14, airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com;
done. dated September 30, 2014. Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:18 Mar 30, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\31MRP1.SGM 31MRP1
Document Created: 2015-12-18 11:48:00
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 11:48:00
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Dates		We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 15, 2015.
Contact		Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1138; fax 425-227-1149.
FR Citation		80 FR 17000
RIN Number		2120-AA64
CFR Associated		Air Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety
80 FR 17000 - Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONFederal Aviation Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 61 (March 31, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
