80 FR 17034 - Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 61 (March 31, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 61 (March 31, 2015)
| Page Range | 17034-17036 | |
| FR Document | 2015-07382 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 61 (Tuesday, March 31, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 17034-17036] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-07382] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-867] Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On September 24, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large power transformers from the Republic of Korea.\1\ The review covers five producers/exporters of the subject merchandise, Hyosung Corporation (Hyosung), Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (Hyundai), ILJIN, ILJIN Electric Co., Ltd. (ILJIN Electric), and LSIS Co., Ltd. (LSIS). ILJIN, ILJIN Electric, and LSIS, were not selected for individual examination. The period of review (POR) is February 16, 2012, through July 31, 2013. As a result of our analysis of the comments and information received, these final results differ from the Preliminary Results. For the final weighted-average dumping margins, see the ``Final Results of Review'' section below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012- 2013, 79 FR 57046 (September 24, 2014) (Preliminary Results). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective March 31, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Davis (Hyosung) or David Cordell (Hyundai), AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-7924 or (202) 482-0408, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On September 24, 2014, the Department published the Preliminary Results. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), we invited parties to comment on our Preliminary Results.\2\ On October 15, 2014, the Department issued a post-preliminary supplemental questionnaire, to which Hyundai [[Page 17035]] responded on November 3 and 12, 2014, and December 2, 2014. On December 19, 2014, Hyosung and ABB Inc. (Petitioner) timely submitted case briefs.\3\ Rebuttal briefs were also timely filed by Hyosung, Hyundai, and Petitioner, on January 9, 2015.\4\ On January 20, 2015, the Department issued a memorandum extending the time period for issuing the final results of this administrative review from January 22, 2015 to March 16, 2015. On March 6, 2015, the Department further extended the final results to March 23, 2015.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ The Department issued the briefing schedule in a Memorandum to the File, dated November 3, 2014. This briefing schedule was later extended at the request of interested parties to December 19, 2014 for briefs and January 9, 2015 for rebuttal briefs on all issues, except one. \3\ See Brief from Petitioner regarding Hyundai, (Petitioner Brief Hyundai), Brief from Petitioner regarding Hyosung (Petitioner Brief Hyosung) and Hyosung Brief, all dated December 19, 2014. \4\ See Hyosung Rebuttal Brief, Hyundai Rebuttal Brief and Petitioner Rebuttal Brief: All dated January 9, 2015. Petitioner requested an extension for rebuttal briefs to January 9, 2015 which the Department granted for all parties on December 8, 2014. See Letter to All Interested Parties dated December 8, 2014. Petitioner also requested a further extension for submission of the initial briefs, which the Department denied in its letter to all parties dated December 17, 2014, with the exception of one issue. \5\ See Memoranda to the file dated January 20, 2015 and March 6, 2015. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The scope of this order covers large liquid dielectric power transformers (LPTs) having a top power handling capacity greater than or equal to 60,000 kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), whether assembled or unassembled, complete or incomplete. The merchandise subject to the order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States at subheadings 8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080 and 8504.90.9540.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see the Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, titled ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea; 2012-2013'' (Issues and Decision Memorandum), which is issued concurrent with and hereby adopted by this notice, and dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\7\ A list of the issues that parties raised and to which we responded is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on-file electronically via ACCESS. ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.ita.doc.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we recalculated Hyosung's and Hyundai's weighted-average dumping margins for these final results. For Hyosung, we revised our margin program by adjusting Hyosung's reported U.S. duty expenses for certain sales transactions. We are also including U.S. freight expenses that were excluded in the Preliminary Results and including the entered value of a unit that entered the United States during the POR in our calculation of the assessment rates for entries of LPTs during the POR.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Memorandum from Brian Davis to the File, regarding ``Analysis of Data Submitted by Hyosung Corporation in the Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea; 2012-2013'' (Hyosung Final Analysis Memorandum), dated March 23, 2014, at section ``Changes from the Preliminary Results,'' for further information. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We made some changes to our calculation programs for Hyundai with respect to oil and certain other expenses. We also used the latest revised databases for U.S. sales and the Cost of Production based on post-preliminary questionnaires and responses.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Memorandum from David Cordell to the File, regarding ``Analysis of Data Submitted by Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. in the Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea; 2012-2013'' (Hyundai Final Analysis Memorandum), dated March 23, 2014, at section ``Changes from the Preliminary Results,'' for further information. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As a result of the aforementioned recalculations of Hyosung's and Hyundai's weighted-average dumping margins, the weighted-average dumping margin for the three non-selected companies also changed. Final Results of the Review As a result of this review, the Department determines the following weighted-average dumping margins \10\ for the period February 16, 2012, through July 31, 2013, are as follows: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ The rate applied to the non-selected companies (i.e., ILJIN, ILJIN Electric, and LSIS) is a weighted-average percentage margin calculated based on the publicly-ranged U.S. volumes of the two reviewed companies with an affirmative dumping margin, for the period February 16, 2012, through July 31, 2013. See Memorandum to the File titled, ``Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea: Final Dumping Margin for Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination,'' through Angelica Townshend, Program Manager, dated concurrently with this notice. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Manufacturer/exporter margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hyosung Corporation......................................... 6.43 Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd........................... 9.53 ILJIN Electric Co., Ltd..................................... 8.16 ILJIN....................................................... 8.16 LSIS Co., Ltd............................................... 8.16 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Duty Assessment The Department shall determine and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.\11\ For any individually examined respondents whose weighted- average dumping margin is above de minimis, we calculated importer- specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Upon issuance of the final results of this administrative review, if any importer-specific assessment rates calculated in the final results are above de minimis (i.e., at or above 0.5 percent), the Department will issue instructions directly to CBP to assess antidumping duties on appropriate entries. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ In these final results, the Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- To determine whether the duty assessment rates covering the period were de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), for each respondent we calculated importer (or customer)-specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the amount of dumping calculated for all U.S. sales to that importer or customer and dividing this amount by the total entered value of the sales to that importer (or customer). Where an importer (or customer)-specific ad valorem rate is greater than de minimis, and the respondent has reported reliable entered values, we apply the assessment rate to the entered value of the importer's/customer's entries during the review period. The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on [[Page 17036]] May 6, 2003.\12\ This clarification will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by the respondent for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. For a full discussion of this clarification, see the Automatic Assessment Clarification. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Automatic Assessment Clarification). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We intend to issue assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of this notice for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of these final results, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for respondents noted above will be the rate established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 29.93 percent, the all- others rate established in the antidumping investigation.\13\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: March 23, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. List of Issues III. Background IV. Discussion of Interested Party Comments A. General Issues Comment 1: Whether the Department Treats Installation Expenses as Further Manufacturing Costs B. Hyosung-Specific Issues Comment 2: Discrepancies Between Hyosung's Net U.S. Price (as Calculated by the Department) and Reported Entered Values Comment 3: Hyosung Has Overstated Its Reported U.S. Prices and Understated/Omitted U.S. Expenses and Whether To Apply Adverse Facts Available (AFA) Comment 4: U.S. Commission Expenses Comment 5: U.S. Ocean Freight Expenses Comment 6: Installation Expenses Comment 7: The Department Erred in Conducting the Differential Pricing Analysis Comment 8: Consideration of an Alternative Comparison Method in an Administrative Review Comment 9: Denial of Offsets for Non-Dumped U.S. Sales When Using the A-To-T Comparison Method In Administrative Reviews Comment 10: Harbor Maintenance Fees Comment 11: Oil Expenses Comment 12: Exclusion of Certain U.S. Freight Expenses for a Particular U.S. Sales Transaction Comment 13: Calculation of Importer-Specific Assessment Rate Comment 14: Incomplete Further Manufacturing Cost Data C. Hyundai-Specific Issues Comment 15: Hyundai's U.S. Sales Data are Not Reliable or Verifiable Because of Certain Submissions and Should Not Be Used in the Final Results Comment 16: AFA With Respect to Comment 15 (Above). Comment 17: ``Overlapping'' Sales Between Investigation and This Review Comment 18: Alleged Underreported U.S. Movement and Selling Expenses Comment 19: Hyundai's Reporting of Home Market Sales Comment 20: Indirect Selling Expenses Comment 21: Section E Response Was Not Complete Comment 22: Whether Total AFA is Warranted Based On the Totality of Hyundai's Responses V. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015-07382 Filed 3-30-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![17034 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 61 / Tuesday, March 31, 2015 / Notices
21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, Marine Sanctuary in the Northwestern DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Hawaiian Islands. Since that time, the
Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the area has been proclaimed a Marine International Trade Administration
‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the FTZ National Monument and the main [A–580–867]
Board’s Web site, which is accessible messages we are trying to share with the
via www.trade.gov/ftz. public have changed to better reflect the Large Power Transformers From the
For further information, contact Pierre new monument status, UNESCO World Republic of Korea: Final Results of
Duy at Pierre.Duy@trade.gov (202) 482– Heritage status and the joint Antidumping Duty Administrative
1378. management by the three co-trustees of Review; 2012–2013
Dated: March 24, 2015. the Monument. We therefore are seeking
to find out if people visiting our Center AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Andrew McGilvray, International Trade Administration,
are receiving our new messages by
Executive Secretary. Department of Commerce.
conducting an optional exit survey.
[FR Doc. 2015–07381 Filed 3–30–15; 8:45 am] SUMMARY: On September 24, 2014, the
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P II. Method of Collection Department of Commerce (the
Surveys will be conducted by in- Department) published the preliminary
person interview as people exit the results of the administrative review of
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Center. Interviewers will record the antidumping duty order on large
responses on paper, and later transfer power transformers from the Republic of
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Korea.1 The review covers five
Administration them to an electronic database.
producers/exporters of the subject
III. Data merchandise, Hyosung Corporation
Proposed Information Collection;
OMB Control Number: 0648–0582. (Hyosung), Hyundai Heavy Industries
Comment Request;
Form Number: None. Co., Ltd. (Hyundai), ILJIN, ILJIN Electric
Papahanaumokuakea Marine National
Type of Review: Regular submission Co., Ltd. (ILJIN Electric), and LSIS Co.,
Monument Mokupapapa Discovery
(extension of a currently approved Ltd. (LSIS). ILJIN, ILJIN Electric, and
Center Exhibit Evaluation
collection). LSIS, were not selected for individual
AGENCY: National Oceanic and Affected Public: Individuals or examination. The period of review
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), households. (POR) is February 16, 2012, through July
Commerce. Estimated Number of Respondents: 31, 2013. As a result of our analysis of
ACTION: Notice. 250. the comments and information received,
Estimated Time Per Response: 7 these final results differ from the
SUMMARY: The Department of minutes. Preliminary Results. For the final
Commerce, as part of its continuing Estimated Total Annual Burden weighted-average dumping margins, see
effort to reduce paperwork and Hours: 29. the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section
respondent burden, invites the general Estimated Total Annual Cost to below.
public and other Federal agencies to Public: $0 in recordkeeping/reporting DATES: Effective March 31, 2015.
take this opportunity to comment on costs. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
proposed and/or continuing information Brian Davis (Hyosung) or David Cordell
IV. Request for Comments
collections, as required by the (Hyundai), AD/CVD Operations, Office
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Comments are invited on: (a) whether VI, Enforcement and Compliance,
DATES: Written comments must be the proposed collection of information International Trade Administration,
submitted on or before June 1, 2015. is necessary for the proper performance U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
of the functions of the agency, including Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental whether the information shall have Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
Paperwork Clearance Officer, practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 482–7924 or (202) 482–0408,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616, agency’s estimate of the burden respectively.
14th and Constitution Avenue NW., (including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at JJessup@doc.gov). ways to enhance the quality, utility, and Background
clarity of the information to be
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: On September 24, 2014, the
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
Requests for additional information or burden of the collection of information Department published the Preliminary
copies of the information collection on respondents, including through the Results. In accordance with 19 CFR
instrument and instructions should be use of automated collection techniques 351.309(c)(1)(ii), we invited parties to
directed to Andy Collins, at (808) 694– or other forms of information comment on our Preliminary Results.2
3922 or Andy.Collins@noaa.gov. technology. On October 15, 2014, the Department
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments submitted in response to issued a post-preliminary supplemental
this notice will be summarized and/or questionnaire, to which Hyundai
I. Abstract
included in the request for OMB
This request is for extension of a 1 See Large Power Transformers From the
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
approval of this information collection; Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of
currently approved information they also will become a matter of public Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
collection. Mokupapapa Discovery record. 2013, 79 FR 57046 (September 24, 2014)
Center (Center) is an outreach arm of (Preliminary Results).
Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Dated: March 26, 2015. 2 The Department issued the briefing schedule in
Monument that reaches 60,000 people Sarah Brabson, a Memorandum to the File, dated November 3,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer. 2014. This briefing schedule was later extended at
each year in Hilo, Hawai‘i. The Center the request of interested parties to December 19,
was created eight years ago to help raise [FR Doc. 2015–07290 Filed 3–30–15; 8:45 am] 2014 for briefs and January 9, 2015 for rebuttal
support for the creation of a National BILLING CODE 3510–NK–P briefs on all issues, except one.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:32 Mar 30, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM 31MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_17095/page/1.svg)
![17036 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 61 / Tuesday, March 31, 2015 / Notices
May 6, 2003.12 This clarification will during the POR. Failure to comply with Comment 13: Calculation of Importer-
apply to entries of subject merchandise this requirement could result in the Specific Assessment Rate
during the POR produced by the Department’s presumption that Comment 14: Incomplete Further
Manufacturing Cost Data
respondent for which it did not know its reimbursement of antidumping and/or C. Hyundai-Specific Issues
merchandise was destined for the countervailing duties occurred and the Comment 15: Hyundai’s U.S. Sales Data are
United States. In such instances, we will subsequent assessment of doubled Not Reliable or Verifiable Because of
instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed antidumping duties. Certain Submissions and Should Not Be
entries at the all-others rate if there is no Used in the Final Results
rate for the intermediate company(ies) Administrative Protective Order Comment 16: AFA With Respect to
involved in the transaction. For a full This notice also serves as a reminder Comment 15 (Above).
discussion of this clarification, see the to parties subject to administrative Comment 17: ‘‘Overlapping’’ Sales
Automatic Assessment Clarification. protective orders (APO) of their Between Investigation and This Review
We intend to issue assessment responsibility concerning the return or Comment 18: Alleged Underreported U.S.
Movement and Selling Expenses
instructions directly to CBP 15 days destruction of proprietary information
Comment 19: Hyundai’s Reporting of
after publication of the final results of disclosed under APO in accordance Home Market Sales
this review. with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which Comment 20: Indirect Selling Expenses
continues to govern business Comment 21: Section E Response Was Not
Cash Deposit Requirements
proprietary information in this segment Complete
The following cash deposit of the proceeding. Timely written Comment 22: Whether Total AFA is
requirements will be effective upon notification of the return/destruction of Warranted Based On the Totality of
publication of this notice for all APO materials, or conversion to judicial Hyundai’s Responses
shipments of subject merchandise protective order, is hereby requested. V. Recommendation
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, Failure to comply with the regulations [FR Doc. 2015–07382 Filed 3–30–15; 8:45 am]
for consumption on or after the and the terms of an APO is a BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
publication of these final results, as sanctionable violation.
provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: We are issuing and publishing this
(1) The cash deposit rate for notice in accordance with sections COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
respondents noted above will be the rate 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 COMMISSION
established in the final results of this CFR 351.213(h).
administrative review; (2) for Agency Information Collection
Dated: March 23, 2015.
merchandise exported by manufacturers Activities Under OMB Review
Paul Piquado,
or exporters not covered in this
administrative review but covered in a Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading
Compliance. Commission.
prior segment of the proceeding, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the Appendix ACTION: Notice.
company specific rate published for the List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues SUMMARY: In compliance with the
most recently completed segment of this and Decision Memorandum Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a (PRA), this notice announces that the
I. Summary
firm covered in this review, a prior II. List of Issues Information Collection Request (ICR)
review, or the original investigation, but III. Background abstracted below has been forwarded to
the manufacturer is, the cash deposit IV. Discussion of Interested Party Comments the Office of Management and Budget
rate will be the rate established for the A. General Issues
(OMB) for review and comment. The
most recently completed segment of this Comment 1: Whether the Department
Treats Installation Expenses as Further ICR describes the nature of the
proceeding for the manufacturer of the information collection and its expected
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash Manufacturing Costs
B. Hyosung-Specific Issues costs and burden.
deposit rate for all other manufacturers Comment 2: Discrepancies Between DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or exporters will continue to be 29.93 Hyosung’s Net U.S. Price (as Calculated or before April 30, 2015.
percent, the all-others rate established by the Department) and Reported
in the antidumping investigation.13 ADDRESSES: Comments regarding the
Entered Values
These cash deposit requirements, when Comment 3: Hyosung Has Overstated Its burden estimated or any other aspect of
imposed, shall remain in effect until Reported U.S. Prices and Understated/ the information collection, including
further notice. Omitted U.S. Expenses and Whether To suggestions for reducing the burden,
Apply Adverse Facts Available (AFA) may be submitted directly to OMB
Notification to Importers Regarding the Comment 4: U.S. Commission Expenses within 30 days of the notice’s
Reimbursement of Duties Comment 5: U.S. Ocean Freight Expenses publication by email at
Comment 6: Installation Expenses OIRAsubmissions@omb.eop.gov. Please
This notice also serves as a final Comment 7: The Department Erred in
reminder to importers of their Conducting the Differential Pricing
identify the comments by OMB Control
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) Analysis No. 3038–0069. Please provide the
to file a certificate regarding the Comment 8: Consideration of an Commission with a copy of all
reimbursement of antidumping and/or Alternative Comparison Method in an submitted comments at the address
Administrative Review listed below. Please refer to OMB
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
countervailing duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries Comment 9: Denial of Offsets for Non- Reference No. 3038–0069, found on
Dumped U.S. Sales When Using the A- http://reginfo.gov. Comments may also
12 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
To-T Comparison Method In be mailed to the Office of Information
Administrative Reviews
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
Comment 10: Harbor Maintenance Fees
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Automatic Assessment Management and Budget, Attention:
Clarification). Comment 11: Oil Expenses
13 See Large Power Transformers From the Comment 12: Exclusion of Certain U.S. Desk Officer for the Commodity Futures
Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR Freight Expenses for a Particular U.S. Trading Commission, 725 17th Street
53177 (August 31, 2012). Sales Transaction NW., Washington, DC 20503, and to
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:32 Mar 30, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM 31MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_17095/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-18 11:48:37
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 11:48:37
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective March 31, 2015. | |
| Contact | Brian Davis (Hyosung) or David Cordell (Hyundai), AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-7924 or (202) 482-0408, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 17034 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR