80 FR 18279 - Decision That Nonconforming 2012 McLaren MP4-12C Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 64 (April 3, 2015)
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 64 (April 3, 2015)
| Page Range | 18279-18281 | |
| FR Document | 2015-07607 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 64 (Friday, April 3, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 18279-18281] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-07607] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [Docket No. NHTSA-2012-0004, Notice 2] Decision That Nonconforming 2012 McLaren MP4-12C Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Grant of petition. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This document announces a decision by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that certain 2012 McLaren MP4-12C passenger cars (PCs) that were not originally manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) are eligible for importation into the United States because they are substantially similar to vehicles originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States that were certified by their manufacturer as complying with the safety standards (the U.S. certified version of the 2012 McLaren MP4-12C PC), and they are capable of being readily altered to conform to the standards. DATES: This decision became effective on March 26, 2015. ADDRESSES: For further information contact George Stevens, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-5308). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Under 49 U.S.C 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not originally manufactured to conform to all applicable FMVSS shall be refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States, certified as required under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same model year as the model of the motor vehicle to be compared, and is capable of being readily altered to conform to all applicable FMVSS. Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in the Federal Register. J.K. Technologies, LLC, of Baltimore, Maryland (``JK'') (Registered Importer# RI-90-006), petitioned NHTSA to decide whether 2012 McLaren MP4-12C PCs are eligible for importation into the United States. NHTSA published a notice of the petition on March 3, 2014 (79 FR 11869) to afford an opportunity for public comment. The reader is referred to that notice for a thorough description of the petition. Comments On March 27, 2014, NHTSA received a request from McLaren Automotive Inc. (McLaren), the vehicle's original manufacturer, to extend the comment period by two weeks. NHTSA approved this request to allow McLaren additional time to respond to the issues presented in the petition. McLaren submitted its comments on April 15, 2014. In its comments, McLaren stated that while it agreed that the U.S. and the non-U.S. versions of the vehicle are ``substantially similar'' within the meaning of section 30141(a)(1)(A)(i), it strongly disputed JK's assertions that the non-U.S. version could be readily altered to comply with all applicable FMVSS. McLaren elaborated by presenting detailed reasons for its assertions with respect to specific FMVSS. On May 21, 2014, NHTSA forwarded McLaren's comments to JK and asked that it respond by June, 4, 2014. By letter dated June 10, 2014, JK requested a 45 day extension in order to gather engineering data to adequately address the concerns raised by McLaren. NHTSA approved JK's request for this extension and JK responded on July 29, 2014. A summary of McLaren's comments, JK's responses, and the conclusions that NHTSA has reached with regard to the issues raised by the parties is set forth below. Comments and Conclusions NHTSA has reviewed the petition, McLaren's comments and JK's responses to those comments, and has concluded that the vehicles covered by the petition are capable of being readily altered to comply with all applicable FMVSS. However, NHTSA has also decided that an RI who imports or modifies one of these vehicles must include in the statement of conformity and associated documents (referred to as a ``conformity package'') it submits to NHTSA under 49 CFR 592.6(d) specific proof to confirm that the vehicle was manufactured to conform to, or was successfully altered to conform to, each of the following standards: FMVSS No. 101, Controls and displays; McLaren commented that the necessary reprogramming to achieve conformity to the standard can only be performed with a tool available only to authorized McLaren dealers that can only be operated by an authorized McLaren entity using a recognized username and password. McLaren claimed that the tool is not offered for sale to non-McLaren affiliated entities. JK responded that the reprogramming equipment it used to modify the vehicle to the standard is available in Europe and that it validated the programs and encryption codes on a U.S. version of the vehicle. NHTSA has decided that a description of how the programming changes were completed and how compliance with the standard was verified must be included in each conformity package. Photographs, printouts, and/or screenshots, as practicable, must also be submitted as proof that the reprogramming was carried out. FMVSS No. 108, Lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment; McLaren commented that in addition to the modifications described in the petition, ``a completely new US vehicle [wiring] harness would be required.'' Moreover, as it contended with regard to FMVSS No. 101, McLaren asserted that reprogramming ``can only be performed using an approved McLaren tool'' which the manufacturer claimed is ``only available to authorized McLaren dealers'' and ``can only be used by an authorized McLaren entity with the use of a username and password.'' JK responded that it has ``a USA version vehicle for these programs and encryption codes,'' and that it will replace or add wiring harnesses as necessary. NHTSA has decided that a description of how the programming changes were completed and how [[Page 18280]] compliance was verified must accompany each conformity package. Photographs, printouts, and/or screenshots, as practicable, must also be submitted as proof that the reprogramming was carried out. FMVSS No. 111, Rearview mirrors; McLaren commented that in addition to the modifications noted in the petition, the driver's outside rearview mirror would need to be replaced with a compliant mirror. NHTSA has decided that proof, including photographs, must be submitted with each conformity package to show that the vehicle was either originally equipped with, or was altered through the addition of, a driver's side rearview mirror that allows the vehicle to meet the applicable requirements of FMVSS No. 111. FMVSS No. 114 Theft protection and rollaway prevention; As was the case with FMVSS Nos. 101 and 108, McLaren contended that reprogramming ``can only be performed using an approved McLaren tool'' which is ``only available to authorized McLaren dealers'' and ``can only be used by an authorized McLaren entity with the use of a username and password.'' JK responded that it has ``a USA version vehicle for these programs and encryption codes.'' NHTSA has decided that a description of how the programming changes were completed and how compliance was verified must accompany each conformity package. Additionally, photographs, printouts, and/or screenshots, as practicable, must be submitted as proof that the reprogramming was carried out. FMVSS No. 138, Tire pressure monitoring systems; McLaren contended that tire pressure monitoring systems (TPMS) are not standard equipment on all European 12C vehicles and that substantial work would be required to bring vehicles into compliance with the standard. McLaren asserted that because of the extent and complexity of the required changes, vehicles not originally equipped with TPMS cannot be ``readily altered'' in order to bring them into compliance with the standard. According to McLaren, even if the vehicle is already equipped with the TPMS hardware, ``a reconfiguration using an approved McLaren dealership tool would be required to bring the TPMS functionality into compliance with FMVSS No. 138.'' Mclaren reiterated that this tool is ``only available to authorized McLaren dealers'' and ``can only be used by an authorized McLaren entity with the use of a username and password''. JK responded that it has ``a USA version vehicle for these programs and encryption codes.'' NHTSA has decided that a description of how any applicable programming changes were completed and how compliance was verified must accompany each conformity package. Additionally, photographs, printouts, and/or screenshots, as practicable, must be submitted as proof that the reprogramming was carried out. FMVSS No. 205, Glazing materials; McLaren commented that contrary to the claim in the petition, non-U.S. vehicles do not comply with this standard because they are ``fitted with AS3 glass in the rear of the vehicle (behind the B-Pillar). Such AS3 glass does not comply with the light transmittance requirements of FMVSS No. 205. It would be difficult to replace that AS3 glass with the AS2 glass required by FMVSS No. 205; in some cases the entire engine would have to be removed to make the modification.'' JK responded that each vehicle will be inspected and that any non- compliant glass will be replaced. JK contended that the non-U.S. certified vehicle it inspected was already equipped with compliant glass. NHTSA has decided that photographic evidence of the required markings to demonstrate that the glazing complies with the standard must be submitted with each conformity package. FMVSS No. 208, Occupant Protection; McLaren challenged the petition's assertion that the non-U.S. certified vehicles are originally manufactured to meet all requirements of this standard, noting in particular that European model vehicles are not equipped with ``advanced air bags,'' as that term is used in the United States. McLaren contended that the occupant restraint software system used in U.S. vehicles is specific to those vehicles and that only vehicles with a designated U.S. vehicle identification number (VIN) can be programmed with that software. For that reason, McLaren claimed the necessary reconfiguration of the system would be impossible, since a European 12C vehicle's VIN would not be recognized, and the software upload would be prevented. JK responded that it ``will change and/or add all the US model systems to the European vehicles modified under this petition.'' JK noted that these parts include knee airbags, wiring harnesses, and sensors, and claimed that ``the programming of the ECU is a modification that JK is very familiar with.'' JK also stated that it has ``the necessary equipment to load the correct US McLaren MP4-12C advanced airbag programs into the European MP4-12C and retain the European VIN.'' NHTSA has decided that each conformity package must include a detailed description of the occupant protection system in place on the vehicle at the time was delivered to the RI, and a similarly detailed description of the occupant protection system in place after the vehicle is altered, including photographs of all required labeling. The description must also include parts assembly diagrams and associated part numbers for all components that were removed from or installed on the vehicle, a description of how the programming changes were completed, and a description of how compliance was verified. Additionally, photographs (e.g., monitor print screen captures) or report printouts, as practicable, must be submitted as proof that the reprogramming was carried out. FMVSS No. 225, Child restraint anchorage systems; McLaren disputed the petition's claim that U.S. and non-U.S.-certified vehicles are identical with regard to this standard. The manufacturer contended that European vehicles lack a top tether anchor plate and further observed that installation of the anchor plate requires drilling into the fuel cell bulkhead. JK responded that the upper anchorages will be added in the exact position designated by McLaren and that it has all of the engineering drawings for the U.S. model MP4-12C for these tethers. NHTSA has decided that a detailed description of the alterations made to achieve conformity with the standard must be included in each conformity package. The description must include sufficient information to validate how the alterations allowed the vehicle to meet the requirements of the standard. This information must include photographic evidence that the modification was carried out, as well as testing and/or engineering analysis reports documenting how the RI has verified that the alterations will allow the vehicle to meet all applicable requirements of the standard. FMVSS No. 401 Interior trunk release; McLaren commented that reprogramming can only be performed using an approved McLaren tool that is only available to authorized McLaren dealers and can only be used by an authorized McLaren entity with the use of a username and password. JK responded that it has the necessary equipment to load the correct US McLaren programs. NHTSA has decided that each conformity package must include a [[Page 18281]] description of how the programming changes were completed and how compliance was verified. Additionally, photographs, printouts, and/or screenshots, as practicable, must be submitted as proof that the reprogramming was carried out. 49 CFR part 581, Bumper Standard; McLaren commented that in addition to the modifications set out in the petition, the bumper foam would need to be replaced and a different rear bumper skin would need to be installed in the license plate area. JK responded that it is aware of all the parts necessary to bring these vehicles into compliance with this standard and it will change all parts of the system to U.S. parts to make the vehicle compliant. NHTSA has decided that each conformity package must include a detailed description of all modifications made to achieve conformity with the standard. This description must include part numbers for each part replaced and be supported with photographic evidence of the modifications made to achieve conformity. In addition to the information specified above, each conformity package must include evidence showing how the RI verified that the changes it made in loading or reprograming vehicle software to achieve conformity with each separate FMVSS, did not also cause the vehicle to fall out of compliance with any other applicable FMVSS. Decision Accordingly, on the basis of the foregoing, NHTSA hereby decides that MY 2012 McLaren MP4-12C passenger cars that were not originally manufactured to comply with all applicable FMVSS, are substantially similar to 2012 McLaren MP4-12C PCs manufactured for importation into and/or sale in the United States, and certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and are capable of being readily altered to conform to all applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. Vehicle Eligibility Number for Subject Vehicles The importer of a vehicle admissible under any final decision must indicate on the form HS-7 accompanying entry the appropriate vehicle eligibility number indicating that the vehicle is eligible for entry. VSP-569 is the vehicle eligibility number assigned to vehicles admissible under this notice of final decision. Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8. Jeffrey M. Giuseppe, Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance. [FR Doc. 2015-07607 Filed 4-2-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Notices 18279
collected. The Agency will summarize vehicle to be compared, and is capable Comments and Conclusions
or include your comments in the request of being readily altered to conform to all NHTSA has reviewed the petition,
for OMB’s clearance of this ICR. applicable FMVSS. McLaren’s comments and JK’s responses
Issued under the authority of 49 CFR 1.87 Petitions for eligibility decisions may to those comments, and has concluded
on: March 26, 2015. be submitted by either manufacturers or that the vehicles covered by the petition
G. Kelly Regal, importers who have registered with are capable of being readily altered to
Associate Administrator for Office of NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR part 592. As comply with all applicable FMVSS.
Research and Information Technology and specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA However, NHTSA has also decided that
Chief Information Officer. publishes notice in the Federal Register an RI who imports or modifies one of
[FR Doc. 2015–07675 Filed 4–2–15; 8:45 am] of each petition that it receives, and these vehicles must include in the
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
affords interested persons an statement of conformity and associated
opportunity to comment on the petition. documents (referred to as a ‘‘conformity
At the close of the comment period, package’’) it submits to NHTSA under
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NHTSA decides, on the basis of the 49 CFR 592.6(d) specific proof to
petition and any comments that it has confirm that the vehicle was
National Highway Traffic Safety received, whether the vehicle is eligible manufactured to conform to, or was
Administration for importation. The agency then successfully altered to conform to, each
[Docket No. NHTSA–2012–0004, Notice 2]
publishes this decision in the Federal of the following standards:
Register. FMVSS No. 101, Controls and
Decision That Nonconforming 2012 J.K. Technologies, LLC, of Baltimore, displays; McLaren commented that the
McLaren MP4–12C Passenger Cars Are Maryland (‘‘JK’’) (Registered Importer# necessary reprogramming to achieve
Eligible for Importation RI–90–006), petitioned NHTSA to conformity to the standard can only be
decide whether 2012 McLaren MP4–12C performed with a tool available only to
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic PCs are eligible for importation into the authorized McLaren dealers that can
Safety Administration (NHTSA), United States. NHTSA published a only be operated by an authorized
Department of Transportation (DOT). notice of the petition on March 3, 2014 McLaren entity using a recognized
ACTION: Grant of petition. (79 FR 11869) to afford an opportunity username and password. McLaren
for public comment. The reader is claimed that the tool is not offered for
SUMMARY: This document announces a referred to that notice for a thorough
decision by the National Highway sale to non-McLaren affiliated entities.
description of the petition. JK responded that the reprogramming
Traffic Safety Administration that
certain 2012 McLaren MP4–12C Comments equipment it used to modify the vehicle
passenger cars (PCs) that were not to the standard is available in Europe
On March 27, 2014, NHTSA received and that it validated the programs and
originally manufactured to comply with a request from McLaren Automotive Inc.
all applicable Federal Motor Vehicle encryption codes on a U.S. version of
(McLaren), the vehicle’s original the vehicle.
Safety Standards (FMVSS) are eligible manufacturer, to extend the comment
for importation into the United States NHTSA has decided that a
period by two weeks. NHTSA approved description of how the programming
because they are substantially similar to this request to allow McLaren additional
vehicles originally manufactured for changes were completed and how
time to respond to the issues presented compliance with the standard was
importation into and sale in the United in the petition.
States that were certified by their verified must be included in each
McLaren submitted its comments on conformity package. Photographs,
manufacturer as complying with the April 15, 2014. In its comments,
safety standards (the U.S. certified printouts, and/or screenshots, as
McLaren stated that while it agreed that practicable, must also be submitted as
version of the 2012 McLaren MP4–12C the U.S. and the non-U.S. versions of
PC), and they are capable of being proof that the reprogramming was
the vehicle are ‘‘substantially similar’’ carried out.
readily altered to conform to the within the meaning of section
standards. FMVSS No. 108, Lamps, reflective
30141(a)(1)(A)(i), it strongly disputed devices, and associated equipment;
DATES: This decision became effective JK’s assertions that the non-U.S. version McLaren commented that in addition to
on March 26, 2015. could be readily altered to comply with the modifications described in the
ADDRESSES: For further information all applicable FMVSS. McLaren petition, ‘‘a completely new US vehicle
contact George Stevens, Office of elaborated by presenting detailed [wiring] harness would be required.’’
Vehicle Safety Compliance, NHTSA reasons for its assertions with respect to Moreover, as it contended with regard to
(202–366–5308). specific FMVSS. FMVSS No. 101, McLaren asserted that
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 21, 2014, NHTSA forwarded reprogramming ‘‘can only be performed
McLaren’s comments to JK and asked using an approved McLaren tool’’ which
Background that it respond by June, 4, 2014. By the manufacturer claimed is ‘‘only
Under 49 U.S.C 30141(a)(1)(A), a letter dated June 10, 2014, JK requested available to authorized McLaren
motor vehicle that was not originally a 45 day extension in order to gather dealers’’ and ‘‘can only be used by an
manufactured to conform to all engineering data to adequately address authorized McLaren entity with the use
applicable FMVSS shall be refused the concerns raised by McLaren. of a username and password.’’
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
admission into the United States unless NHTSA approved JK’s request for this JK responded that it has ‘‘a USA
NHTSA has decided that the motor extension and JK responded on July 29, version vehicle for these programs and
vehicle is substantially similar to a 2014. encryption codes,’’ and that it will
motor vehicle originally manufactured A summary of McLaren’s comments, replace or add wiring harnesses as
for importation into and sale in the JK’s responses, and the conclusions that necessary.
United States, certified as required NHTSA has reached with regard to the NHTSA has decided that a
under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same issues raised by the parties is set forth description of how the programming
model year as the model of the motor below. changes were completed and how
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:49 Apr 02, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM 03APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_18343/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Notices 18281
description of how the programming Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: Frequency: One time per respondent.
changes were completed and how delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and Total Burden Hours (annually
compliance was verified. Additionally, 501.8. including all respondents): Less than 0.4
photographs, printouts, and/or Jeffrey M. Giuseppe, hours.
screenshots, as practicable, must be Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
Total ‘‘Non-hour Burden’’ Cost: No
submitted as proof that the ‘‘non-hour cost’’ burdens associated
[FR Doc. 2015–07607 Filed 4–2–15; 8:45 am]
reprogramming was carried out. with this collection have been
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
identified.
49 CFR part 581, Bumper Standard;
Needs and Uses: The Board is, by
McLaren commented that in addition to
statute, responsible for the economic
the modifications set out in the petition, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
regulation of freight rail carriers and
the bumper foam would need to be certain other carriers operating in
replaced and a different rear bumper Surface Transportation Board
interstate commerce. The Application to
skin would need to be installed in the Open a Billing Account is a form used
Notice and Request for Comments
license plate area. by persons doing business before the
JK responded that it is aware of all the AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, Board who wish to open an account
parts necessary to bring these vehicles DOT. with the Board to facilitate their
into compliance with this standard and ACTION: 30-day notice and request for payment of filing fees; fees for the
it will change all parts of the system to comments: Application to Open a search, review, copying, and
U.S. parts to make the vehicle Billing Account. certification of records; and fees for
compliant. other services rendered by the Board.
SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort An account holder is billed on a
NHTSA has decided that each to streamline the process to seek
conformity package must include a monthly basis for payment of
feedback from the public on agency accumulated fees. Data provided is also
detailed description of all modifications service delivery, and as required by the
made to achieve conformity with the used for debt collection activities. The
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 application form requests information as
standard. This description must include U.S.C. 3501–3519 (PRA), the Surface
part numbers for each part replaced and required by OMB and U.S. Department
Transportation Board (STB or Board) of Treasury regulations for the
be supported with photographic gives notice that it is requesting from
evidence of the modifications made to collection of fees. This information is
the Office of Management and Budget not duplicated by any other agency. In
achieve conformity. (OMB) approval of the collection, accordance with the Privacy Act, 5
In addition to the information Application to Open a Billing Account. U.S.C. 552a, all taxpayer identification
specified above, each conformity The Board previously published a
and social security numbers are secured
package must include evidence showing notice about this collection in the
and used only for credit management
how the RI verified that the changes it Federal Register on January 28, 2015, at
and debt collection activities.
made in loading or reprograming 80 FR 4634. That notice allowed for a Retention Period: The STB retains this
vehicle software to achieve conformity 60-day public review and comment information until respondent asks to
with each separate FMVSS, did not also period. No comments were received. close account and outstanding debts, if
cause the vehicle to fall out of Comments may now be submitted to any, are paid in full.
compliance with any other applicable OMB concerning: (1) The accuracy of
DATES: Written comments are due on
FMVSS. the Board’s burden estimates; (2) ways
to enhance the quality, utility, and June 1, 2015.
Decision clarity of the information collected; (3) ADDRESSES: Written comments should
ways to minimize the burden of the be identified as ‘‘Paperwork Reduction
Accordingly, on the basis of the Act Comments, Application to Open an
collection of information on the
foregoing, NHTSA hereby decides that Account for Billing Purposes, OMB
respondents, including the use of
MY 2012 McLaren MP4–12C passenger Number 2140–0006.’’ These comments
automated collection techniques or
cars that were not originally should be directed to the Office of
other forms of information technology,
manufactured to comply with all Management and Budget, Office of
when appropriate; and (4) whether this
applicable FMVSS, are substantially Information and Regulatory Affairs,
collection of information is necessary
similar to 2012 McLaren MP4–12C PCs Attention: Chandana Achanta, Surface
for the proper performance of the
manufactured for importation into and/ Transportation Board Desk Officer, by
functions of the Board, including
or sale in the United States, and email at OIRA_SUBMISSION@
whether the collection has practical
certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and are OMB.EOP.GOV; by fax at (202) 395–
utility.
capable of being readily altered to 6974; or by mail to Room 10235, 725
conform to all applicable Federal Motor Description of Collection 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503.
Vehicle Safety Standards. Title: Application to Open a Billing For Further Information or To Obtain
Vehicle Eligibility Number for Subject Account. a Copy of the STB Form, Contact:
Vehicles OMB Control Number: 2140–0006. Marcin Skomial, (202) 245–0346.
STB Form Number: STB Form 1032. [Federal Information Relay Service
The importer of a vehicle admissible Type of Review: Extension of a (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: (800)
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
under any final decision must indicate currently approved collection. 877–8339.]
on the form HS–7 accompanying entry Respondents: Rail carriers, shippers, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
the appropriate vehicle eligibility and others doing business before the PRA, a Federal agency conducting or
number indicating that the vehicle is STB. sponsoring a collection of information
eligible for entry. VSP–569 is the Number of Respondents: 5. must display a currently valid OMB
vehicle eligibility number assigned to Estimated Time per Response: Less control number. A collection of
vehicles admissible under this notice of than .08 hours, based on actual survey information, which is defined in 44
final decision. of respondents. U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c),
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:49 Apr 02, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM 03APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_18343/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-18 15:29:14
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 15:29:14
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Grant of petition. | |
| Dates | This decision became effective on March 26, 2015. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 18279 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR