80 FR 18295 - Agency Information Collection Activities; New Information Collection Request: Electronic Logging Device (ELD) Registration
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 64 (April 3, 2015)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 64 (April 3, 2015)
| Page Range | 18295-18298 | |
| FR Document | 2015-07669 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 64 (Friday, April 3, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 18295-18298] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-07669] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration [Docket No. FMCSA-2014-0377] Agency Information Collection Activities; New Information Collection Request: Electronic Logging Device (ELD) Registration AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FMCSA announces its plan to submit the Information Collection Request (ICR) described below to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for its review and approval and invites public comment on the approval of a new (ICR) entitled, Electronic Logging Device Registration. This ICR will be used to enable providers to register their ELDs with FMCSA. DATES: Please send your comments by May 4, 2015. OMB must receive your comments by this date in order to act on the ICR. ADDRESSES: All comments should reference Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Docket Number FMCSA-2014-0377. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. Comments should be addressed to the attention of the Desk Officer, Department of Transportation/Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, and sent via electronic mail to [email protected], or faxed to (202) 395-6974, or mailed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Brian Routhier, Transportation Specialist, Technology Division, Office of Analysis, Research and Technology, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Department of Transportation, West Building 6th Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Telephone: 202-366-1225; email [email protected]. Office hours are from 9:00 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title: Electronic Logging Device (ELD) Registration. OMB Control Number: 2126-00XX. Type of Request: New Collection. Respondents: ELD providers. Estimated Number of Respondents: 22. FMCSA estimates that there will be 22 respondents, 20 U.S. and 2 foreign ELD providers, and that each provider will register an average of 4 devices. The total of 88 devices (4 devices x 22 providers) exceeds the number of devices that FMCSA is currently aware of, but the Agency has opted to use a conservatively high count in order to avoid under-estimating the burden for this ICR. Estimated Time per Response: 15 minutes first year and 7.5 minutes in subsequent years. Each provider will take an estimated 15 minutes of preparation time plus 15 minutes per device to complete the initial registration, for a total of 75 minutes per provider in the first year (15 minutes of preparation time + (4 devices per provider x 15 minutes per device) = 75 minutes). In subsequent years, it is estimated that registration updates will take half the initial time, for a total of 37.5 minutes per provider (7.5 minutes of preparation time + (4 devices per provider x 7.5 minutes per device) = 37.5 minutes). Expiration Date: N/A. This is a new ICR. Frequency of Response: On occasion. Estimated Total Annual Burden: 18 hours [((22 respondents x 75 minutes in year 1) + (22 respondents x 37.5 minutes [[Page 18296]] in year 2) + (22 respondents x 37.5 minutes in year 3)) = 3,300 minutes / 60 minutes per hour = 55 / 3 year approval period = 18.33 hours, rounded to 18 hours]. Background On March 28, 2014, FMCSA published a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) entitled, ``Electronic Logging Devices and Hours of Service Supporting Documents,'' (79 FR 17656). Specifically, the SNPRM proposed: (1) New technical specifications for ELDs that address statutory requirements; and (2) to require the use of ELDs by those within the motor carrier industry who are currently subject to Records of Duty Status (RODS) preparation requirements. To ensure consistency among manufacturers and devices, functional specifications were published with the SNPRM. The SNPRM would require providers to certify their compliance with these functional specifications. Providers would also be required to register their compliant devices with FMCSA. The ELD providers will be asked to certify and register their devices with FMCSA online via an application Form MCSA-5893, ``Electronic Logging Device (ELD) Registration and Certification.'' FMCSA expects 100 percent of respondents to submit their information electronically. Once the registration is completed, FMCSA will issue the provider a unique identification number that the provider will embed in its device(s). The FMCSA will maintain a list on its Web site of the current ELD providers and devices that have been certified (by the providers) to meet the technical specifications. The information will be necessary for fleets and drivers to easily find a compliant ELD to use in meeting the FMCSA regulation requiring the use of ELDs. Comments From the Public General Summary FMCSA published a notice in the Federal Register with a 60-day public comment period to announce this proposed ICR on October 28, 2014 (79 FR 64248). The Agency requested comments concerning the necessity of the proposed information collection, the accuracy of the estimated burden, how the quality of collected information could be enhanced and ways in which the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of the collected information. The Agency received 19 comments. Of these comments, nine were outside the scope of this notice. Some of these comments actually responded to elements of the ELD SNPRM, rather than the registration process. Guidance on Registration Process Several commenters stated that there was a need for additional guidance for ELD registration. Garmin also wanted guidance on registration when an ELD sub-function may be implemented across multiple software and hardware components provided by one or more providers. Two commenters asked who is responsible for registration and supplying the certification of conformity to the ELD functional requirements. Verigo suggested that FMCSA clarify what supporting documentation would be necessary to complete the software certification. One commenter wrote that, according to the SNPRM, only device manufacturers can register. FMCSA Response Registration of ELDs is the responsibility of the ELD provider. An ELD provider is the entity who manufactures the ELD, manufactures or assembles the ELD technology, certifies that the ELD complies with the functional specifications for ELDs set forth in the proposed subpart B of part 395 (including the proposed Appendix to subpart B of Part 395), and registers it on the FMCSA Web site. Definition of Device and Other Systems With ELD Functionality A commenter wanted clarification of what FMCSA means by device. A commenter suggested that FMCSA allow the certification and registration of individual devices or subsystems (e.g., Bluetooth device, mobile smartphone or tablet, etc.) as meeting a subset of the technical specifications. These components could be combined into compliant ELD systems. A commenter asked how a software-based Transportation Management System would be registered. FMCSA Response Electronic Logging Device (ELD) means a device or technology that meets the requirements of proposed subpart B of part 395 including the proposed Appendix to subpart B of part 395--Functional Specifications for All Electronic Logging Devices (ELDs). In proposed Sec. 395.2 it is defined as a device or technology that automatically records a driver's driving time and facilitates the accurate recording of the driver's hours of service, and that meets the requirements of subpart B of this part. Where the combination of sub-components is needed to meet this definition, the provider must register all of the components together as the ELD device. Software Version Control Commenters asked how software version updates would be accommodated. Vnomics recommended that the software version that is displayed be the current base or main version. Vnomics also asked FMCSA to verify that the software version required by proposed section 5.2.1(3) refers to the ELD software version that is part of a larger telematics solution. FMCSA Response The ELD registration process will allow providers to update and maintain their device information to accommodate software version revisions. Providers will be able to update device information and software revisions on the registration site when they deem it necessary to do so, and will continue to certify that the updated device(s) continue to meet the regulation's requirements. See SNPRM Section 5.1.2: 5.1.2. Keeping Information Current The ELD provider must keep the information in section 5.1.1 (b) and 5.2.1 current through FMCSA's Web site. Time To Register/Registration Information Saucon reminded the Agency that the content of the form would affect the estimates of the time registration would take annually. Saucon could not concur with the time estimate to complete the registration process. The commenter wrote that the time estimate depends on several undefined factors, including the level of detail in Form MCSA-5893. Saucon suggested that a simple checklist of key technical points that must be met by the provider might be sufficient for the form. Saucon also asked FMCSA to clarify that certification is required at the product level, and not the individual device level. Until all the technical specification issues in the SNPRM have been resolved and Form MCSA-5893 has been created to require the provision of substantive information demonstrating compliance, OOIDA believed that the ICR proceeding is premature. OOIDA believed the certification, with such specific information, should be updated as the rule evolves, otherwise a provider could remain on the approved list without additional verification of continued compliance. [[Page 18297]] A commenter asked how devices can be registered as compliant before the details of compliancy are published. Saucon noted that the form was not available for comment. While the registration process itself did not impose an undue burden, Verigo was concerned that there was no estimate of the time required to complete the software certification or what would be required to be submitted to substantiate that certification. Verigo commented that the certification process is a significant undertaking and volunteered to provide its estimate to FMCSA. FMCSA Response As proposed in the SNPRM, the registration of ELDs requires 15 pieces of information from the providers outlined in section 5.1.1, Registering Online, and section 5.1.2, Online Certification. FMCSA conducted time trials to determine the average amount of time required to complete a simulated form with the 15 items required to register an ELD. 5.1.1 Registering Online (a) An ELD provider developing an ELD technology must register online at a secure FMCSA Web site where the ELD provider can securely certify that its ELD is compliant with this appendix. (b) Provider's registration must include the following information: (1) Company name of the technology provider/manufacturer. (2) Name of an individual authorized by the provider to verify that the ELD is compliant with this appendix and to certify it under section 5.2 of this appendix. (3) Address of the registrant. (4) Email address of the registrant. (5) Telephone number of the registrant. 5.2.1. Online Certification (a) An ELD provider registered online as described in section 5.1.1 must disclose the information in paragraph (b) of this section about each ELD model and version and certify that the particular ELD is compliant with the requirements of this appendix. (b) The online process will only allow a provider to complete certification if the provider successfully discloses all of the following required information: (1) Name of the product. (2) Model number of the product. (3) Software version of the product. (4) An ELD identifier, uniquely identifying the certified model and version of the ELD, assigned by the ELD provider in accordance with 7.1.15. (5) Picture and/or screen shot of the product. (6) User's manual describing how to operate the ELD. (7) Description of the supported and certified data transfer mechanisms and step-by-step instructions for a driver to produce and transfer the ELD records to an authorized safety official. (8) Summary description of ELD malfunctions. (9) Procedure to validate an ELD authentication value as described in section 7.1.14. (10) Certifying statement describing how the product was tested to comply with FMCSA regulations. Registration will be at the model level of the ELD, not at the individual device level. See 5.2.1(b)(2) above. FMCSA will include procedures for provider registration of an ELD on the registration Web site. FMCSA will also provide guidance on the Web site to the provider that will contain the tools the provider will need to ensure that its ELD meets the technical specifications in part 395. This guidance will contain all requirements and procedures related to RODS data compliance. However, it will be the responsibility of each provider to ensure that its products comply with the RODS file data definitions that FMCSA provides. If the regulation evolves, the changes to the technical specification and the certification process will be updated through the notice and comment process. In response to Verigo comments regarding the time necessary to determine whether the software meets the certification requirements, we note that the certification process is outside the scope of the current ICR, which is limited to the time required to fill out the certification information in 5.1.1 and 5.2.1 of the Appendix to 395. ID/Authentication Under proposed section 5.1.3, FMCSA will provide a unique ELD registration ID number that the provider will embed on the device. Saucon asked FMCSA to provide an example of the ID number, and to clarify its purpose, including when the ID number needs to be provided and displayed. It asked if the ID number could be used as evidence during inspections that a device is ELD-certified and if Saucon would receive a certificate that it could present at inspections. FMCSA Response The unique ELD registration ID format is outside the scope of this ICR. But, in section 7.17 of the Appendix to Subpart B of Part 395-- Functional Specifications for All Electronic Logging Devices (ELDs), FMCSA defined the ELD Registration ID and proposed that the registration ID be available on the ELD during inspections. The Agency does not plan to issue certificates for certified ELDs. Updating Existing Devices Saucon asked how that ID number could be added to register existing, already installed AOBRDs that, through software updates, may become compliant ELDs. These AOBRDs are not easily accessible to either the manufacturer or the motor carrier. FMCSA Response Software updates, although outside the scope of this ICR, would most likely be provided through the connectivity of AOBRDs via their cellular connection or available online to AOBRD owners. These software updates can include the Registration ID for the newly compliant devices. Existing device providers will be able to notify owners of existing AOBRDs if their devices are capable of being updated to meet ELD requirement through software updates. These devices in turn will be able to be registered and certified by the providers on the FMCSA ELD registration Web site. FMCSA Certified ELD List Saucon provided a list of information that it suggested be included on any Web site storing information on ELD-certified providers. The list included the company name and contact information, a link to the provider's Web site, a descriptor noting in which industry the provider mainly works (i.e., motorcoach, trucking, etc.), and a section for comments on what the provider provides. Saucon also suggested that the provider have a username and password to access and edit the information on the Web site. During roadside inspections and Safety Audits and Compliance Reviews, CVSA wrote that it would be critical for inspectors to accurately and quickly verify compliance. Therefore, the Agency must consider what documentation needs to be maintained as evidence of certification. FMCSA Response The FMCSA list of registered devices will include only the minimal information on the certified devices. The Agency outlined this in the SNPRM in Section 5.3: 5.3. Publicly Available Information Except for the information listed under section 5.1.1 (b)(2), (4), and (5) and section 5.2.1 (b)(9), FMCSA will make the information in sections 5.1.1 and 5.2.1 for each certified ELD publicly [[Page 18298]] available on a Web site to allow motor carriers to determine which products have been properly registered and certified as ELDs compliant with this appendix. FMCSA will not provide or require ``certification documents'' that would be carried with the device. The ELD Registration ID will be verified through eRODS only. De-Registration Verigo was concerned with the ELD de-registration process and requested more information. FMCSA Response FMCSA will provide information regarding the de-registration process in the Final Rule. Self-Certification OOIDA commented that the information required of ELD manufacturers who wish to be on FMCSA's approved list of providers must be more substantive than a general self-certification of compliance with the technical specifications of the rule. FMCSA Response The registration of ELDs requires 15 pieces of information from the providers, as outlined in proposed section 5, ELD Registration and Certification, Section 5.1.1, Registering Online, and section 5.1.2, Online Certification. Specifically, proposed section 5.2.1(b)(10) would require a ``Certifying statement describing how the product was tested to comply with FMCSA regulations.'' The Agency requires this self- certification just as NHTSA requires self-certification of vehicle and parts manufacturers. Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any of the following aspects of this information collection: (1) Whether the proposed collection is necessary for the FMCSA to perform its functions; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) ways for the FMCSA to enhance the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the collected information; and (4) ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of the collected information. Issued under the authority of 49 CFR 1.87 on: March 26, 2015. G. Kelly Regal, Associate Administrator, Office of Research and Information Technology and Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2015-07669 Filed 4-2-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Notices 18295
sidewalls, the vehicle’s Owner’s Manual 30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to to the Office of Information and
which contains information pertaining file petitions for a determination of Regulatory Affairs, Office of
to the various tire sizes and tire pressure inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to Management and Budget. Comments
for use on the affected vehicles, and exempt manufacturers only from the should be addressed to the attention of
BMW’s Roadside AssistanceTM program duties found in sections 30118 and the Desk Officer, Department of
which is available 24 hours/day and 30120, respectively, to notify owners, Transportation/Federal Motor Carrier
provides representatives who have purchasers, and dealers of a defect or Safety Administration, and sent via
information on all available tire sizes noncompliance and to remedy the electronic mail to oira_submission@
and specifications for a given model and defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any omb.eop.gov, or faxed to (202) 395–
model year of BMW. BMW states its decision on this petition only applies to 6974, or mailed to the Office of
belief that all of the above listed sources the subject vehicles that BMW no longer Information and Regulatory Affairs,
would lead the driver to obtaining the controlled at the time it determined that Office of Management and Budget,
correct recommended cold inflation the noncompliance existed. However, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th
pressure when attempting to inflate the any decision on this petition does not Street NW., Washington, DC 20503.
tires mounted on their vehicle. relieve vehicle distributors and dealers FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
For the subject vehicles containing of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for Brian Routhier, Transportation
both incorrect 49 CFR part 567 sale, or introduction or delivery for Specialist, Technology Division, Office
certification labels and incorrect FMVSS introduction into interstate commerce of of Analysis, Research and Technology,
No. 110 tire information labels BMW the noncompliant vehicles under their Federal Motor Carrier Safety
states that the driver can use the control after BMW notified them that Administration, Department of
labeling on the sidewall of the installed the subject noncompliance existed. Transportation, West Building 6th
tires, the vehicle’s owner’s manual, and
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
BMW Roadside AssistanceTM to
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and Washington, DC 20590. Telephone:
determine the recommended cold 501.8. 202–366–1225; email brian.routhier@
inflation pressure for the tires installed
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe, dot.gov. Office hours are from 9:00 a.m.
on their vehicle.
BMW also maintains that if a driver to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
were to use the cold inflation pressure except Federal holidays.
[FR Doc. 2015–07608 Filed 4–2–15; 8:45 am]
shown on the incorrect labels for the for SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
18-inch tires when inflating the 19-inch Title: Electronic Logging Device (ELD)
tires, that pressure would be sufficient Registration.
to support vehicle loading. Their DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OMB Control Number: 2126–00XX.
calculations using the MY 2015 X5 Type of Request: New Collection.
xDrive35i for example show that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Respondents: ELD providers.
determined load rating for two 19-inch Administration Estimated Number of Respondents:
tires inflated to the pressure meant for 22. FMCSA estimates that there will be
[Docket No. FMCSA–2014–0377] 22 respondents, 20 U.S. and 2 foreign
18-inch tires is 1,572 kg. Because the
front gross axle weight rating (GAWR) is Agency Information Collection ELD providers, and that each provider
1,279 kg, BMW concludes that the 19- Activities; New Information Collection will register an average of 4 devices. The
inch tires would be adequately inflated. Request: Electronic Logging Device total of 88 devices (4 devices × 22
BMW also included calculations to (ELD) Registration providers) exceeds the number of
demonstrate that the information on the devices that FMCSA is currently aware
certification labels is correct for the 18- AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety of, but the Agency has opted to use a
inch tires mounted on the subject Administration (FMCSA), DOT. conservatively high count in order to
vehicles. ACTION: Notice and request for avoid under-estimating the burden for
BMW states that BMW Customer comments. this ICR.
Relations have not received any contact Estimated Time per Response: 15
SUMMARY: In accordance with the minutes first year and 7.5 minutes in
from vehicle owners regarding this issue
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, subsequent years. Each provider will
and, therefore, are unaware that any
FMCSA announces its plan to submit take an estimated 15 minutes of
vehicle owner has encountered this
the Information Collection Request (ICR) preparation time plus 15 minutes per
issue in the field. They state that they
described below to the Office of device to complete the initial
are also unaware of any accident or
Management and Budget (OMB) for its registration, for a total of 75 minutes per
injuries that have occurred as a result of
review and approval and invites public provider in the first year (15 minutes of
this noncompliance.
BMW has additionally informed comment on the approval of a new (ICR) preparation time + (4 devices per
NHTSA that it has corrected the subject entitled, Electronic Logging Device provider × 15 minutes per device) = 75
noncompliance. Registration. This ICR will be used to minutes). In subsequent years, it is
In summation, BMW believes that the enable providers to register their ELDs estimated that registration updates will
described noncompliance of the subject with FMCSA. take half the initial time, for a total of
vehicles is inconsequential to motor DATES: Please send your comments by 37.5 minutes per provider (7.5 minutes
vehicle safety, and that its petition, to May 4, 2015. OMB must receive your of preparation time + (4 devices per
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
exempt BMW from providing recall comments by this date in order to act on provider x 7.5 minutes per device) =
notification of noncompliance as the ICR. 37.5 minutes).
required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and ADDRESSES: All comments should Expiration Date: N/A. This is a new
remedying the recall noncompliance as reference Federal Docket Management ICR.
required by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be System (FDMS) Docket Number Frequency of Response: On occasion.
granted. FMCSA–2014–0377. Interested persons Estimated Total Annual Burden: 18
NHTSA notes that the statutory are invited to submit written comments hours [((22 respondents × 75 minutes in
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and on the proposed information collection year 1) + (22 respondents × 37.5 minutes
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:49 Apr 02, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00108 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM 03APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_18359/page/1.svg)
![18296 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Notices
in year 2) + (22 respondents × 37.5 Some of these comments actually components is needed to meet this
minutes in year 3)) = 3,300 minutes ÷ 60 responded to elements of the ELD definition, the provider must register all
minutes per hour = 55 ÷ 3 year approval SNPRM, rather than the registration of the components together as the ELD
period = 18.33 hours, rounded to 18 process. device.
hours].
Guidance on Registration Process Software Version Control
Background Several commenters stated that there Commenters asked how software
On March 28, 2014, FMCSA was a need for additional guidance for version updates would be
published a supplemental notice of ELD registration. Garmin also wanted accommodated. Vnomics recommended
proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) entitled, guidance on registration when an ELD that the software version that is
‘‘Electronic Logging Devices and Hours sub-function may be implemented displayed be the current base or main
of Service Supporting Documents,’’ (79 across multiple software and hardware version. Vnomics also asked FMCSA to
FR 17656). Specifically, the SNPRM components provided by one or more verify that the software version required
proposed: (1) New technical providers. by proposed section 5.2.1(3) refers to the
specifications for ELDs that address Two commenters asked who is ELD software version that is part of a
statutory requirements; and (2) to responsible for registration and larger telematics solution.
require the use of ELDs by those within supplying the certification of conformity
to the ELD functional requirements. FMCSA Response
the motor carrier industry who are
currently subject to Records of Duty Verigo suggested that FMCSA clarify The ELD registration process will
Status (RODS) preparation what supporting documentation would allow providers to update and maintain
requirements. To ensure consistency be necessary to complete the software their device information to
among manufacturers and devices, certification. One commenter wrote that, accommodate software version
functional specifications were according to the SNPRM, only device revisions. Providers will be able to
published with the SNPRM. The manufacturers can register. update device information and software
SNPRM would require providers to revisions on the registration site when
FMCSA Response they deem it necessary to do so, and
certify their compliance with these
functional specifications. Providers Registration of ELDs is the will continue to certify that the updated
would also be required to register their responsibility of the ELD provider. An device(s) continue to meet the
compliant devices with FMCSA. ELD provider is the entity who regulation’s requirements. See SNPRM
The ELD providers will be asked to manufactures the ELD, manufactures or Section 5.1.2:
certify and register their devices with assembles the ELD technology, certifies
5.1.2. Keeping Information Current
FMCSA online via an application Form that the ELD complies with the
MCSA–5893, ‘‘Electronic Logging functional specifications for ELDs set The ELD provider must keep the
Device (ELD) Registration and forth in the proposed subpart B of part information in section 5.1.1 (b) and
Certification.’’ FMCSA expects 100 395 (including the proposed Appendix 5.2.1 current through FMCSA’s Web
percent of respondents to submit their to subpart B of Part 395), and registers site.
information electronically. Once the it on the FMCSA Web site. Time To Register/Registration
registration is completed, FMCSA will Definition of Device and Other Systems Information
issue the provider a unique With ELD Functionality Saucon reminded the Agency that the
identification number that the provider content of the form would affect the
A commenter wanted clarification of
will embed in its device(s). estimates of the time registration would
what FMCSA means by device. A
The FMCSA will maintain a list on its take annually. Saucon could not concur
commenter suggested that FMCSA allow
Web site of the current ELD providers with the time estimate to complete the
the certification and registration of
and devices that have been certified (by registration process. The commenter
individual devices or subsystems (e.g.,
the providers) to meet the technical wrote that the time estimate depends on
Bluetooth device, mobile smartphone or
specifications. The information will be several undefined factors, including the
tablet, etc.) as meeting a subset of the
necessary for fleets and drivers to easily level of detail in Form MCSA–5893.
technical specifications. These
find a compliant ELD to use in meeting Saucon suggested that a simple
components could be combined into
the FMCSA regulation requiring the use checklist of key technical points that
compliant ELD systems.
of ELDs. must be met by the provider might be
A commenter asked how a software-
Comments From the Public based Transportation Management sufficient for the form. Saucon also
System would be registered. asked FMCSA to clarify that
General Summary
certification is required at the product
FMCSA published a notice in the FMCSA Response level, and not the individual device
Federal Register with a 60-day public Electronic Logging Device (ELD) level.
comment period to announce this means a device or technology that meets Until all the technical specification
proposed ICR on October 28, 2014 (79 the requirements of proposed subpart B issues in the SNPRM have been resolved
FR 64248). The Agency requested of part 395 including the proposed and Form MCSA–5893 has been created
comments concerning the necessity of Appendix to subpart B of part 395— to require the provision of substantive
the proposed information collection, the Functional Specifications for All information demonstrating compliance,
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
accuracy of the estimated burden, how Electronic Logging Devices (ELDs). In OOIDA believed that the ICR proceeding
the quality of collected information proposed § 395.2 it is defined as a is premature. OOIDA believed the
could be enhanced and ways in which device or technology that automatically certification, with such specific
the burden could be minimized without records a driver’s driving time and information, should be updated as the
reducing the quality of the collected facilitates the accurate recording of the rule evolves, otherwise a provider could
information. The Agency received 19 driver’s hours of service, and that meets remain on the approved list without
comments. Of these comments, nine the requirements of subpart B of this additional verification of continued
were outside the scope of this notice. part. Where the combination of sub- compliance.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:49 Apr 02, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00109 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM 03APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_18359/page/2.svg)
![18298 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Notices
available on a Web site to allow motor manufacturers who wish to be on following aspects of this information
carriers to determine which products FMCSA’s approved list of providers collection: (1) Whether the proposed
have been properly registered and must be more substantive than a general collection is necessary for the FMCSA to
certified as ELDs compliant with this self-certification of compliance with the perform its functions; (2) the accuracy of
appendix. technical specifications of the rule. the estimated burden; (3) ways for the
FMCSA will not provide or require FMCSA to enhance the quality,
‘‘certification documents’’ that would be FMCSA Response
usefulness, and clarity of the collected
carried with the device. The ELD The registration of ELDs requires 15 information; and (4) ways that the
Registration ID will be verified through pieces of information from the burden could be minimized without
eRODS only. providers, as outlined in proposed reducing the quality of the collected
De-Registration section 5, ELD Registration and information.
Certification, Section 5.1.1, Registering
Verigo was concerned with the ELD Online, and section 5.1.2, Online Issued under the authority of 49 CFR 1.87
de-registration process and requested Certification. Specifically, proposed on: March 26, 2015.
more information. section 5.2.1(b)(10) would require a G. Kelly Regal,
FMCSA Response ‘‘Certifying statement describing how Associate Administrator, Office of Research
FMCSA will provide information the product was tested to comply with and Information Technology and Chief
FMCSA regulations.’’ The Agency Information Officer.
regarding the de-registration process in
the Final Rule. requires this self-certification just as [FR Doc. 2015–07669 Filed 4–2–15; 8:45 am]
NHTSA requires self-certification of BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
Self-Certification vehicle and parts manufacturers.
OOIDA commented that the Public Comments Invited: You are
information required of ELD asked to comment on any of the
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:49 Apr 02, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00111 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM 03APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_18359/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-18 15:28:43
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 15:28:43
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice and request for comments. | |
| Dates | Please send your comments by May 4, 2015. OMB must receive your comments by this date in order to act on the ICR. | |
| Contact | Mr. Brian Routhier, Transportation Specialist, Technology Division, Office of Analysis, Research and Technology, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Department of Transportation, West Building 6th Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Telephone: 202-366-1225; email [email protected] Office hours are from 9:00 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 18295 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR