80_FR_18439 80 FR 18374 - Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

80 FR 18374 - Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 65 (April 6, 2015)

Page Range18374-18375
FR Document2015-07862

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 65 (Monday, April 6, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 65 (Monday, April 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18374-18375]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07862]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Census Bureau


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. chapter 35).
    Agency: U.S. Census Bureau.
    Title: American Community Survey (ACS) Methods Panel Envelope 
Mandatory Messaging Test.
    OMB Control Number: 0607-0936.
    Form Number(s): ACS-1, ACS-1 (Spanish), ACS CATI, ACS CAPI, ACS 
Internet.
    Type of Request: Emergency review.
    Number of Respondents: 24,000.
    Average Hours Per Response: 40 minutes.
    Burden Hours: 16,000.
    Needs and Uses:
    The American Community Survey collects detailed socioeconomic data 
from about 3.5 million households in the United States and 36,000 in 
Puerto Rico each year. The ACS also collects detailed socioeconomic 
data from about 195,000 residents living in Group Quarter (GQ) 
facilities. An ongoing data collection effort with an annual sample of 
this magnitude requires that the ACS continue research, testing and 
evaluations aimed at improving data quality, achieving survey cost 
efficiencies, and improving ACS questionnaire content and related data 
collection materials. The ACS Methods Panel is a research program that 
is designed to address and respond to issues and survey needs. One of 
those issues relates to respondent concerns about the tone of the 
mandatory message on the ACS mail materials.
    The outside of the envelopes that contain the instructions to 
respond online and the paper ACS questionnaire display the bold 
message, ``YOUR RESPONSE IS REQUIRED BY LAW.'' The prominent references 
to the mandatory participation in the ACS are concerning to many 
respondents. The Census Bureau developed the current presentation of 
the mandatory nature of participation based on previous research that 
identified a significant positive impact of these messages in 
encouraging high self-response rates and reducing the need for follow-
up by phone or personal visits by Census Bureau interviewers. In order 
to be responsive to respondent concern with the prominence of the 
mandatory message on the envelopes, we are conducting the Envelope 
Mandatory Messaging Test.
    This test will measure the impact of removing the phrase ``YOUR 
RESPONSE IS REQUIRED BY LAW'' from the envelopes (Attachment C) used to 
mail the initial package (second mailing) as well as the replacement 
package (fourth mailing). This phrase

[[Page 18375]]

does not appear on other envelopes. We will continue to examine other 
possible revisions to the presentation of the mandatory nature of 
participation in the ACS, and will make future recommendations for 
additional testing.
    We have divided the monthly production sample of 295,000 addresses 
in 24 nationally representative groups of approximately 12,000 
addresses each. For this test, planned for the May 2015 ACS panel, we 
will use two randomly assigned groups for the experimental treatment 
group. The total sample size for the experimental treatment group is 
approximately 24,000 addresses. The remaining cases in the May 2015 
panel will comprise the control and receive all standard ACS mailings 
(envelopes with the mandatory language still included). As we are using 
production cases for the test, the test will run through the complete 
three-month data collection period.
    Our primary evaluation measure for this test is the self-response 
rate. Comparing the self-response rates between the two treatments 
allows us to detect at least a 1.0 percentage point difference with 80% 
power and [alpha]=0.1; this calculation assumes a 50% self-response 
rate. Additional metrics of interest include total response rate, cost 
analysis and the impact on ACS estimates.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households,
    Frequency: One-time test as part of the monthly American Community 
Survey,
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    Legal Authority: Title 13, United States Code, Sections 141, 193, 
and 221.
    This information collection request may be viewed at 
www.reginfo.gov. Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce 
collections currently under review by OMB.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 16 days of publication of this notice 
to [email protected] or fax to (202) 395-5806.

    Dated: April 1, 2015.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer, submitting for Census.
[FR Doc. 2015-07862 Filed 4-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P



                                              18374                           Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 65 / Monday, April 6, 2015 / Notices

                                              this changed circumstances review are                   India. Consequently, the Department                   Budget (OMB) for clearance the
                                              addressed in the Issues and Decision                    will instruct U.S. Customs and Border                 following proposal for collection of
                                              Memorandum, which is hereby adopted                     Protection to collect estimated                       information under the provisions of the
                                              by this notice. A list of the issues which              antidumping duties for all shipments of               Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
                                              parties have raised, and to which we                    subject merchandise exported by                       chapter 35).
                                              have responded in the Issues and                        Kokuyo and entered, or withdrawn from                    Agency: U.S. Census Bureau.
                                              Decision Memorandum, is attached to                     warehouse, for consumption on or after                   Title: American Community Survey
                                              this notice as an Appendix.                             the publication date of this notice in the            (ACS) Methods Panel Envelope
                                                 The Issues and Decision                              Federal Register at the current cash                  Mandatory Messaging Test.
                                              Memorandum is a public document and                     deposit rate for Riddhi, which is de                     OMB Control Number: 0607–0936.
                                              is on file electronically via Enforcement               minimis.12 This cash deposit                             Form Number(s): ACS–1, ACS–1
                                              and Compliance’s Antidumping and                        requirement shall remain in effect until              (Spanish), ACS CATI, ACS CAPI, ACS
                                              Countervailing Duty Centralized                         further notice.                                       Internet.
                                              Electronic Service System                                                                                        Type of Request: Emergency review.
                                              (‘‘ACCESS’’).11 ACCESS is available to                  Notification                                             Number of Respondents: 24,000.
                                              registered users at http://                               This notice serves as a reminder to                    Average Hours Per Response: 40
                                              access.trade.gov and is available to all                parties subject to administrative                     minutes.
                                              parties in the Central Records Unit,                    protective order (APO) of their                          Burden Hours: 16,000.
                                              room 7046 of the main Department of                     responsibility concerning the                            Needs and Uses:
                                              Commerce building. In addition, a                                                                                The American Community Survey
                                                                                                      disposition of proprietary information
                                              complete version of the Issues and                                                                            collects detailed socioeconomic data
                                                                                                      disclosed under APO in accordance
                                              Decision Memorandum can be accessed                                                                           from about 3.5 million households in
                                                                                                      with 19 CFR 351.306. Timely written
                                              directly at http://                                                                                           the United States and 36,000 in Puerto
                                                                                                      notification of the return/destruction of
                                              enforcement.ita.doc.gov/frn/index.html.                                                                       Rico each year. The ACS also collects
                                                                                                      APO materials or conversion to judicial
                                              The signed and electronic version of the                                                                      detailed socioeconomic data from about
                                                                                                      protective order is hereby requested.
                                              Issues and Decision Memorandum are                                                                            195,000 residents living in Group
                                                                                                      Failure to comply with the regulations
                                              identical in content.                                                                                         Quarter (GQ) facilities. An ongoing data
                                                                                                      and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
                                                                                                                                                            collection effort with an annual sample
                                              Final Results of Changed                                violation.
                                                                                                        This notice is published in                         of this magnitude requires that the ACS
                                              Circumstances Review                                                                                          continue research, testing and
                                                                                                      accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and
                                                 For the Preliminary Results, the                     777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as                  evaluations aimed at improving data
                                              Department found that Kokuyo was the                    amended, and 19 CFR 351.216(e).                       quality, achieving survey cost
                                              successor-in-interest to Riddhi based on                                                                      efficiencies, and improving ACS
                                                                                                        Dated: March 30, 2015.                              questionnaire content and related data
                                              evidence on the record. For these final
                                              results, the Department continues to                    Paul Piquado,                                         collection materials. The ACS Methods
                                              find that the business transfer from                    Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and               Panel is a research program that is
                                              Riddhi to Kokuyo resulted in no                         Compliance.                                           designed to address and respond to
                                              significant changes to management,                      Appendix                                              issues and survey needs. One of those
                                              production facilities, supplier                                                                               issues relates to respondent concerns
                                              relationships, and customers with                       I. Summary                                            about the tone of the mandatory
                                                                                                      II. Background
                                              respect to the production and sale of the               III. Scope of the Order
                                                                                                                                                            message on the ACS mail materials.
                                              subject merchandise. Thus, we                           IV. Discussion of Interested Party Comments              The outside of the envelopes that
                                              determine that Kokuyo operates as                       Comment 1: Time Periods Analyzed When                 contain the instructions to respond
                                              essentially the same business entity as                       Conducting a Successor-in-Interest CCR          online and the paper ACS questionnaire
                                              Riddhi with respect to the subject                            Analysis                                        display the bold message, ‘‘YOUR
                                              merchandise.                                            Comment 2: Whether Kokuyo’s Management                RESPONSE IS REQUIRED BY LAW.’’
                                                 Accordingly, the Department                                Structure Is Similar to That of Riddhi          The prominent references to the
                                              determines that Kokuyo is the                           Comment 3: Whether Kokuyo’s Production                mandatory participation in the ACS are
                                              successor-in-interest to Riddhi for the                       Facilities Are Similar to Those of Riddhi       concerning to many respondents. The
                                                                                                      Comment 4: Whether Kokuyo’s Customer
                                              purpose of determining antidumping                            Base Is the Same as Riddhi’s
                                                                                                                                                            Census Bureau developed the current
                                              duty liability.                                         Comment 5: Whether Kokuyo’s Supplier Base             presentation of the mandatory nature of
                                                                                                            Is the Same as Riddhi’s                         participation based on previous research
                                              Instructions to U.S. Customs and
                                                                                                      V. Recommendation                                     that identified a significant positive
                                              Border Protection
                                                                                                      [FR Doc. 2015–07826 Filed 4–3–15; 8:45 am]            impact of these messages in encouraging
                                                 As a result of this determination, we                                                                      high self-response rates and reducing
                                                                                                      BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
                                              find that Kokuyo should receive the                                                                           the need for follow-up by phone or
                                              cash deposit rate previously assigned to                                                                      personal visits by Census Bureau
                                              Riddhi in the most recently completed                                                                         interviewers. In order to be responsive
                                                                                                      DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                              review of the antidumping duty order                                                                          to respondent concern with the
                                              on certain lined paper products from                    Census Bureau                                         prominence of the mandatory message
                                                                                                                                                            on the envelopes, we are conducting the
                                                11 On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and
                                                                                                      Submission for OMB Review;                            Envelope Mandatory Messaging Test.
                                              Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and
tkelley on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                      Comment Request                                          This test will measure the impact of
                                              Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic
                                              Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD                                                                  removing the phrase ‘‘YOUR
                                                                                                        The Department of Commerce will
                                              Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).                                                           RESPONSE IS REQUIRED BY LAW’’
                                              The Web site location was changed from http://          submit to the Office of Management and
                                                                                                                                                            from the envelopes (Attachment C) used
                                              iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The
                                              Final Rule changing the references to the                 12 See Certain Lined Paper Products From India:     to mail the initial package (second
                                              Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046                 Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative      mailing) as well as the replacement
                                              (November 20, 2014).                                    Review; 2010–2011, 78 FR 22232 (April 15, 2013).      package (fourth mailing). This phrase


                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:14 Apr 03, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00023   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM   06APN1


                                                                              Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 65 / Monday, April 6, 2015 / Notices                                                     18375

                                              does not appear on other envelopes. We                  DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                with any exporter or producer who
                                              will continue to examine other possible                                                                       exported subject merchandise to the
                                              revisions to the presentation of the                    International Trade Administration                    United States during the POI, including
                                              mandatory nature of participation in the                [C–580–837]                                           those respondents not individually
                                              ACS, and will make future                                                                                     examined during the POI.5
                                              recommendations for additional testing.                 Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality                     In addition to the certifications
                                                                                                      Steel Plate From the Republic of                      described above, pursuant to 19 CFR
                                                 We have divided the monthly                                                                                351.214(b)(2)(iv), Hyundai submitted
                                              production sample of 295,000 addresses                  Korea: Initiation of Countervailing Duty
                                                                                                      New Shipper Review                                    documentation establishing the
                                              in 24 nationally representative groups of                                                                     following: (1) The date on which it first
                                              approximately 12,000 addresses each.                    AGENCY:   Enforcement and Compliance,                 shipped subject merchandise for export
                                              For this test, planned for the May 2015                 International Trade Administration,                   to the United States; (2) the volume of
                                              ACS panel, we will use two randomly                     Department of Commerce.                               its first shipment; and (3) the date of its
                                              assigned groups for the experimental                    DATES: Effective Date: April 6, 2015.                 first sale to an unaffiliated customer in
                                              treatment group. The total sample size                  SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce                   the United States.6 Finally, pursuant to
                                              for the experimental treatment group is                 (the Department) received a timely                    19 CFE 351.214(b)(2)(v), Hyundai
                                              approximately 24,000 addresses. The                     request for a new shipper review of the               submitted a certification that it
                                              remaining cases in the May 2015 panel                   countervailing duty order on certain                  informed the government of the
                                              will comprise the control and receive all               cut-to-length carbon-quality steel plate              Republic of Korea that it will be
                                              standard ACS mailings (envelopes with                   from the Republic of Korea. The                       required to provide a full response to
                                              the mandatory language still included).                 Department has determined that the                    the Department’s questionnaire.7
                                              As we are using production cases for the                request meets the statutory and
                                                                                                      regulatory requirements for initiation.               Period of Review
                                              test, the test will run through the
                                              complete three-month data collection                    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric                   In accordance with 19 CFR
                                              period.                                                 Greynolds, AD/CVD Operations Office                   351.214(g)(2), in countervailing duty
                                                                                                      III, Enforcement and Compliance,                      proceedings, the period of review (POR)
                                                 Our primary evaluation measure for                                                                         for new shipper reviews initiated in the
                                                                                                      International Trade Administration,
                                              this test is the self-response rate.                                                                          month immediately following the
                                                                                                      U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
                                              Comparing the self-response rates                                                                             anniversary month will be the most
                                                                                                      Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
                                              between the two treatments allows us to                 Washington, DC 20230; Telephone:                      recently completed calendar year.
                                              detect at least a 1.0 percentage point                  (202) 482–6071.                                       Therefore, the POR is January 1, 2014,
                                              difference with 80% power and a=0.1;                                                                          through December 31, 2014.
                                                                                                      SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                              this calculation assumes a 50% self-
                                                                                                      Background                                            Initiation of New Shipper Review
                                              response rate. Additional metrics of
                                              interest include total response rate, cost                                                                       Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the
                                                                                                         The countervailing duty order on
                                              analysis and the impact on ACS                                                                                Act and 19 CFR 351.214(d)(1), the
                                                                                                      certain cut-to-length carbon-quality steel
                                              estimates.                                                                                                    Department finds that the request from
                                                                                                      plate from the Republic of Korea
                                                                                                                                                            Hyundai meets the threshold
                                                 Affected Public: Individuals or                      published in the Federal Register on
                                                                                                                                                            requirements for initiation of a new
                                              households,                                             February 10, 2000.1 Pursuant to section
                                                                                                                                                            shipper review for shipments of certain
                                                 Frequency: One-time test as part of                  751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
                                                                                                                                                            cut-to-length carbon-quality steel plate
                                                                                                      as amended (the Act), we received a
                                              the monthly American Community                                                                                from the Republic of Korea produced
                                                                                                      timely request for a new shipper review
                                              Survey,                                                                                                       and exported by Hyundai.8
                                                                                                      of the order from Hyundai Steel Co.,
                                                 Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.                                                                           The Department intends to issue the
                                                                                                      Ltd. (Hyundai).2 Hyundai certified that
                                                                                                                                                            preliminary results of this new shipper
                                                 Legal Authority: Title 13, United                    it is both the producer and exporter of
                                                                                                                                                            review no later than 180 days from the
                                              States Code, Sections 141, 193, and 221.                the subject merchandise upon which the
                                                                                                                                                            date of initiation and final results of the
                                                                                                      request was based.3
                                                 This information collection request                                                                        review no later than 90 days after the
                                                                                                         Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of
                                              may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov.                                                                             date the preliminary results are issued.9
                                                                                                      the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(i),
                                              Follow the instructions to view                                                                                  We will instruct U.S. Customs and
                                                                                                      Hyundai certified that it did not export
                                              Department of Commerce collections                                                                            Border Protection to allow, at the option
                                                                                                      subject merchandise to the United
                                              currently under review by OMB.                                                                                of the importer, the posting, until the
                                                                                                      States during the period of investigation
                                                                                                                                                            completion of the review, of a bond or
                                                 Written comments and                                 (POI).4 In addition, pursuant to section
                                                                                                                                                            security in lieu of a cash deposit for
                                              recommendations for the proposed                        751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Act and 19 CFR
                                                                                                                                                            each entry of the subject merchandise
                                              information collection should be sent                   351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), Hyundai certified
                                                                                                                                                            from Hyundai in accordance with
                                              within 16 days of publication of this                   that, since the initiation of the
                                                                                                                                                            section 751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act and
                                              notice to OIRA_Submission@                              investigation, it has never been affiliated
                                                                                                                                                            19 CFR 351.214(e). Because Hyundai
                                              omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806.                                                                         certified that it produced and exported
                                                                                                        1 See Notice of Amendment of Final
                                                Dated: April 1, 2015.                                 Determinations: Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-
                                                                                                                                                              5 Id.
                                              Sarah Brabson,                                          Quality Steel Plate From India and the Republic of
                                                                                                      Korea; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders:        6 Id., at Exhibits 2, and 3.
tkelley on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                              NOAA PRA Clearance Officer, submitting for              Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate        7 Id., at Exhibit 1.
                                              Census.                                                 From France, India, Indonesia, Italy, and the            8 See the memorandum to the file entitled

                                              [FR Doc. 2015–07862 Filed 4–3–15; 8:45 am]              Republic of Korea, 65 FR 6587 (February 10, 2000)     ‘‘Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate
                                                                                                      (Order).                                              from the Republic of Korea: Initiation Checklist for
                                              BILLING CODE 3510–07–P                                    2 See Hyundai’s new shipper request dated
                                                                                                                                                            Countervailing Duty New Shipper Review of
                                                                                                      February 27, 2015.                                    Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd.’’ dated concurrently with
                                                                                                        3 Id., at Exhibit 1.                                this notice.
                                                                                                        4 Id.                                                  9 See section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act.




                                         VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:14 Apr 03, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00024   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM     06APN1



Document Created: 2015-12-18 11:18:22
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 11:18:22
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation80 FR 18374 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR