80_FR_19140 80 FR 19072 - Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From Finland; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014

80 FR 19072 - Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From Finland; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 68 (April 9, 2015)

Page Range19072-19073
FR Document2015-08210

In response to a request from Ashland Specialty Ingredients, a division of Hercules Inc., (Petitioner), and CP Kelco Oy (CP Kelco), the Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on purified carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) from Finland. The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2014. The review covers one respondent, CP Kelco. We preliminarily find that sales of the subject merchandise by CP Kelco have not been made at prices below normal value (NV) during the POR. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 68 (Thursday, April 9, 2015) 
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 68 (Thursday, April 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19072-19073]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08210]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-405-803]


Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From Finland; Preliminary Results 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to a request from Ashland Specialty Ingredients, a 
division of Hercules Inc., (Petitioner), and CP Kelco Oy (CP Kelco), 
the Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on purified 
carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) from Finland. The period of review (POR) 
is July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2014. The review covers one 
respondent, CP Kelco. We preliminarily find that sales of the subject 
merchandise by CP Kelco have not been made at prices below normal value 
(NV) during the POR. We invite interested parties to comment on these 
preliminary results.

DATES: Effective Date: April 9, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Heaney or Robert James, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4475 or (202) 482-0649, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the order is all purified CMC, sometimes 
also referred to as purified sodium CMC, polyanionic cellulose, or 
cellulose gum, which is a white to off-white, non-toxic, odorless, 
biodegradable powder, comprising sodium CMC that has been refined and 
purified to a minimum assay of 90 percent. The merchandise subject to 
the order is classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States at subheading 3912.31.00.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see the 
memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary 
Enforcement & Compliance, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement & Compliance, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Purified 
Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland'' (Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum), which is dated concurrently with this notice, and is 
hereby incorporated by reference. A list of the topics discussed in 
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum appears in Appendix I of this 
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price 
and constructed export price are calculated in accordance with section 
772 of the Act. NV is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the 
Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically 
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all 
parties in the Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main Department 
of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the 
Internet at http://www.enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

Preliminary Results of the Review

    As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine the 
following weighted-average dumping margin for the period July 1, 2013, 
through June 30, 2014.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Margin
                    Exporter/manufacturer                      (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CP Kelco Oy.................................................       0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

    The Department intends to disclose to interested parties the 
calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results 
within five days of the date of publication of this notice.\2\ Pursuant 
to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit cases briefs no 
later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. 
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be 
filed no later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\3\ 
Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding 
are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the 
issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of 
authorities.\4\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using 
ACCESS.\5\ An electronically filed document must be received 
successfully in its entirety by ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the 
date the document is due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
    \3\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
    \4\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
    \5\ See 19 CFR 351.303.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a 
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 
Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS. An electronically filed 
document must be received successfully in its entirety by the 
Departments electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern 
Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\6\ 
Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone 
number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be 
discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised 
in the respective case briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, 
parties will be notified of the date and time for the hearing to be 
held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department intends to issue the final results of this 
administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the 
issues raised in any

[[Page 19073]]

written briefs, within 120 days after the date of publication of this 
notice, unless extended, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.

Assessment Rates

    Upon completion of the administrative review, the Department shall 
determine and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If CP Kelco's weighted-
average dumping margin is above de minimis in the final results of this 
review, we will calculate an importer-specific assessment rate on the 
basis of the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated 
for the importer's examined sales and the total entered value of such 
sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If CP Kelco's weighted-
average dumping margin is zero or de minimis in the final results of 
review, or an importer-specific rate is zero or de minimis, we will 
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to 
dumping margins.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 
2012) (Final Modification for Reviews).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on 
May 6, 2003.\8\ This clarification will apply to entries of subject 
merchandise during the POR produced by CP Kelco for which it did not 
know its merchandise was destined for the United States. In such 
instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed entries at the 
all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) 
involved in the transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping 
Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of 
the final results of this review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for 
all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication as 
provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for 
CP Kelco Oy will be the rate established in the final results of this 
administrative review except if the rate is de minimis within the 
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate 
will be zero; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or 
exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of 
the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recent period in which the 
manufacturer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not a 
firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original less-than-
fair-value investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 
will be the rate established for the most recent period for the 
manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all 
other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 6.65 percent, the 
all-others rate established in the less-than-fair-value 
investigation.\9\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Purified 
Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland, Mexico, the Netherlands and 
Sweden, 70 FR 39734 (July 11, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of 
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: April 2, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement & Compliance.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

Summary
Background
Scope of The Order
Methodology
    Fair Value Comparisons
    Product Comparisons
    Determination of Comparison Margins
    Results of Differential Pricing Analysis
    Date of Sale
    U.S. Price
    Export Price
    Constructed Export Price
    U.S. Sample Sales
    Normal Value
    Home Market Viability as Comparison Market
    Calculation of NV Based On Comparison Market Prices
    Home Market Sample Sales
    Cost of Production Analysis
    Level of Trade Analysis
    CEP Offset
    Calculation of Normal Value Based on Constructed Value
    Currency Conversion
Conclusion

[FR Doc. 2015-08210 Filed 4-8-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

19072 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 68 / Thursday, April 9, 2015 / Notices destruction of APO materials or Administration, U.S. Department of weighted-average dumping margin for conversion to judicial protective order is Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution the period July 1, 2013, through June 30, hereby requested. Failure to comply Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 2014. with the regulations and terms of an telephone: (202) 482–4475 or (202) 482– APO is a sanctionable violation. 0649, respectively. Margin Exporter/manufacturer This notice is issued and published in (percent) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and Scope of the Order CP Kelco Oy ................................. 0.00 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.216 and The merchandise covered by the order Disclosure and Public Comment 351.221(c)(3). is all purified CMC, sometimes also Dated: April 1, 2015. referred to as purified sodium CMC, The Department intends to disclose to polyanionic cellulose, or cellulose gum, interested parties the calculations Paul Piquado, which is a white to off-white, non-toxic, performed in connection with these Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and preliminary results within five days of Compliance. odorless, biodegradable powder, comprising sodium CMC that has been the date of publication of this notice.2 Appendix I refined and purified to a minimum Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), assay of 90 percent. The merchandise interested parties may submit cases List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum subject to the order is classified in the briefs no later than 30 days after the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the date of publication of this notice. Summary United States at subheading Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised Background Scope of the Order 3912.31.00.1 in the case briefs, may be filed no later Discussion of the Issues than five days after the date for filing 1. The Time Period Examined Methodology case briefs.3 Parties who submit case 2. Whether the Department Should The Department is conducting this briefs or rebuttal briefs in this Distinguish Between Incremental vs. review in accordance with section proceeding are encouraged to submit Rapid Changes 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as with each argument: (1) A statement of 3. Changes to the Four Factors Considered amended (the Act). Export price and the issue; (2) a brief summary of the in Successor-in-Interest Determinations constructed export price are calculated argument; and (3) a table of authorities.4 Recommendation in accordance with section 772 of the Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed [FR Doc. 2015–08222 Filed 4–8–15; 8:45 am] Act. NV is calculated in accordance using ACCESS.5 An electronically filed BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P with section 773 of the Act. For a full document must be received successfully description of the methodology in its entirety by ACCESS, by 5 p.m. underlying our conclusions, see the Eastern Time on the date the document DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Preliminary Decision Memorandum. is due. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), International Trade Administration interested parties who wish to request a is a public document and is on file [A–405–803] electronically via Enforcement and hearing, or to participate if one is Compliance’s Antidumping and requested, must submit a written Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From Countervailing Duty Centralized request to the Assistant Secretary for Finland; Preliminary Results of Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Enforcement and Compliance, filed Antidumping Duty Administrative ACCESS is available to registered users electronically via ACCESS. An Review; 2013–2014 at http://access.trade.gov and is electronically filed document must be AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, available to all parties in the Central received successfully in its entirety by International Trade Administration, Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main the Departments electronic records Department of Commerce. Department of Commerce building. In system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern SUMMARY: In response to a request from addition, a complete version of the Time within 30 days after the date of Ashland Specialty Ingredients, a Preliminary Decision Memorandum can publication of this notice.6 Requests division of Hercules Inc., (Petitioner), be accessed directly on the Internet at should contain: (1) The party’s name, and CP Kelco Oy (CP Kelco), the http://www.enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. address, and telephone number; (2) the Department of Commerce (the The signed Preliminary Decision number of participants; and (3) a list of Department) is conducting an Memorandum and the electronic issues to be discussed. Issues raised in administrative review of the versions of the Preliminary Decision the hearing will be limited to those antidumping duty order on purified Memorandum are identical in content. raised in the respective case briefs. If a carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) from request for a hearing is made, parties Preliminary Results of the Review will be notified of the date and time for Finland. The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2014. The As a result of this review, we the hearing to be held at the U.S. review covers one respondent, CP preliminarily determine the following Department of Commerce, 1401 Kelco. We preliminarily find that sales Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, of the subject merchandise by CP Kelco 1 For a full description of the scope of the order, DC 20230. see the memorandum from Gary Taverman, The Department intends to issue the have not been made at prices below Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary Enforcement normal value (NV) during the POR. We & Compliance, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary final results of this administrative Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES invite interested parties to comment on for Enforcement & Compliance, ‘‘Decision review, including the results of its these preliminary results. Memorandum for Preliminary Results of analysis of the issues raised in any Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Purified DATES: Effective Date: April 9, 2015. Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland’’ 2 See 19 CFR 351.224(b). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), which is 3 See dated concurrently with this notice, and is hereby 19 CFR 351.309(d). Michael J. Heaney or Robert James, AD/ incorporated by reference. A list of the topics 4 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement discussed in the Preliminary Decision 5 See 19 CFR 351.303. and Compliance, International Trade Memorandum appears in Appendix I of this notice. 6 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:13 Apr 08, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM 09APN1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 68 / Thursday, April 9, 2015 / Notices 19073 written briefs, within 120 days after the in this review but covered in a prior Cost of Production Analysis date of publication of this notice, unless segment of the proceeding, the cash Level of Trade Analysis extended, pursuant to section deposit rate will continue to be the CEP Offset Calculation of Normal Value Based on 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. company-specific rate published for the Constructed Value most recent period in which the Currency Conversion Assessment Rates manufacturer or exporter participated; Conclusion Upon completion of the (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered [FR Doc. 2015–08210 Filed 4–8–15; 8:45 am] administrative review, the Department in this review, a prior review, or the shall determine and U.S. Customs and BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P original less-than-fair-value Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, investigation but the manufacturer is, antidumping duties on all appropriate the cash deposit rate will be the rate DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE entries. If CP Kelco’s weighted-average established for the most recent period dumping margin is above de minimis in for the manufacturer of the International Trade Administration the final results of this review, we will merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit calculate an importer-specific [A–570–827] rate for all other manufacturers or assessment rate on the basis of the ratio exporters will continue to be 6.65 of the total amount of antidumping Certain Cased Pencils From the percent, the all-others rate established People’s Republic of China: Final duties calculated for the importer’s in the less-than-fair-value examined sales and the total entered Results of Antidumping Duty Changed investigation.9 These cash deposit Circumstances Review value of such sales in accordance with requirements, when imposed, shall 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If CP Kelco’s remain in effect until further notice. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, weighted-average dumping margin is International Trade Administration, zero or de minimis in the final results Notification to Importers Commerce. of review, or an importer-specific rate is This notice also serves as a SUMMARY: On February 26, 2015, the zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP preliminary reminder to importers of Department of Commerce (the to liquidate the appropriate entries their responsibility under 19 CFR Department) published the notice of without regard to dumping margins.7 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate initiation and the preliminary results of The Department clarified its regarding the reimbursement of the changed circumstances review ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on antidumping duties prior to liquidation (CCR) of the antidumping duty order on May 6, 2003.8 This clarification will of the relevant entries during this certain cased pencils (pencils) from the apply to entries of subject merchandise review period. Failure to comply with People’s Republic of China (PRC), in during the POR produced by CP Kelco this requirement could result in the which the Department preliminarily for which it did not know its Department’s presumption that determined that Beijing FILA Dixon merchandise was destined for the reimbursement of antidumping duties Stationery Co., Ltd.1 (Beijing Dixon), as United States. In such instances, we will occurred and the subsequent assessment currently structured under its new instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed of double antidumping duties. business license, is the successor-in- entries at the all-others rate if there is no We are issuing and publishing these interest to Beijing Dixon.2 For these rate for the intermediate company(ies) results in accordance with sections final results, the Department continues involved in the transaction. 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. to find that Beijing Dixon is the We intend to issue instructions to successor-in-interest to Beijing Dixon as CBP 15 days after publication of the Dated: April 2, 2015. that entity existed at the time the final results of this review. Paul Piquado, Department revoked the order 3 with Assistant Secretary for Enforcement & respect to Beijing Dixon.4 Accordingly, Cash Deposit Requirements Compliance. the Revocation of the antidumping duty The following deposit requirements Order with respect to Beijing Dixon Appendix I will be effective upon publication of the continues to apply to Beijing Dixon as notice of final results of administrative List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum currenly structured. review for all shipments of subject DATES: Effective: April 9, 2015. merchandise entered, or withdrawn Summary from warehouse, for consumption on or Background 1 A/k/a Beijing Dixon Ticonderoga Stationery after the date of publication as provided Scope of The Order Methodology Company, Ltd., and Beijing Dixon Stationery by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The Company. Fair Value Comparisons cash deposit rate for CP Kelco Oy will Product Comparisons 2 See Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s be the rate established in the final Republic of China: Notice of Initiation and Determination of Comparison Margins Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed results of this administrative review Results of Differential Pricing Analysis Circumstances Review, 80 FR 10457 (February 26, except if the rate is de minimis within Date of Sale 2015) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in U.S. Price memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty Order on which case the cash deposit rate will be Export Price Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s Republic of Constructed Export Price China: Decision Memorandum for Preliminary zero; (2) for merchandise exported by Results of Antidumping Duty Changed manufacturers or exporters not covered U.S. Sample Sales Normal Value Circumstances Review Requested by the Dixon Home Market Viability as Comparison Ticonderoga Companies’’ dated February 18, 2015 7 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). Market Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 3 See Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Cased Calculation of NV Based On Comparison Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Pencils from the People’s Republic of China, 59 FR Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 Market Prices 66909 (December 28, 1994) (Order). (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Home Market Sample Sales 4 See Certain Cased Pencils From the People’s Reviews). Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping 8 For a full discussion of this clarification, see 9 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Duty Administrative Review and Determination To Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland, Revoke Order In Part; 2010–2011, 78 FR 42932 (July Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 Mexico, the Netherlands and Sweden, 70 FR 39734 18, 2013) (Revocation) and accompanying issues (May 6, 2003). (July 11, 2005). and decision memorandum (IDM). VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:13 Apr 08, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM 09APN1


Document Created: 2015-12-18 11:23:32
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 11:23:32
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ContactMichael J. Heaney or Robert James, AD/ CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 4475 or (202) 482-0649, respectively.
FR Citation80 FR 19072 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR