80_FR_19141 80 FR 19073 - Certain Cased Pencils From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review

80 FR 19073 - Certain Cased Pencils From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 68 (April 9, 2015)

Page Range19073-19074
FR Document2015-08221

On February 26, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the notice of initiation and the preliminary results of the changed circumstances review (CCR) of the antidumping duty order on certain cased pencils (pencils) from the People's Republic of China (PRC), in which the Department preliminarily determined that Beijing FILA Dixon Stationery Co., Ltd.\1\ (Beijing Dixon), as currently structured under its new business license, is the successor-in-interest to Beijing Dixon.\2\ For these final results, the Department continues to find that Beijing Dixon is the successor-in- interest to Beijing Dixon as that entity existed at the time the Department revoked the order \3\ with respect to Beijing Dixon.\4\ Accordingly, the Revocation of the antidumping duty Order with respect to Beijing Dixon continues to apply to Beijing Dixon as currenly structured. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 68 (Thursday, April 9, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 68 (Thursday, April 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19073-19074]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08221]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-827]


Certain Cased Pencils From the People's Republic of China: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Commerce.
SUMMARY: On February 26, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) published the notice of initiation and the preliminary 
results of the changed circumstances review (CCR) of the antidumping 
duty order on certain cased pencils (pencils) from the People's 
Republic of China (PRC), in which the Department preliminarily 
determined that Beijing FILA Dixon Stationery Co., Ltd.\1\ (Beijing 
Dixon), as currently structured under its new business license, is the 
successor-in-interest to Beijing Dixon.\2\ For these final results, the 
Department continues to find that Beijing Dixon is the successor-in-
interest to Beijing Dixon as that entity existed at the time the 
Department revoked the order \3\ with respect to Beijing Dixon.\4\ 
Accordingly, the Revocation of the antidumping duty Order with respect 
to Beijing Dixon continues to apply to Beijing Dixon as currenly 
structured.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ A/k/a Beijing Dixon Ticonderoga Stationery Company, Ltd., 
and Beijing Dixon Stationery Company.
    \2\ See Certain Cased Pencils from the People's Republic of 
China: Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping 
Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 80 FR 10457 (February 26, 2015) 
(Preliminary Results) and accompanying memorandum, ``Antidumping 
Duty Order on Certain Cased Pencils from the People's Republic of 
China: Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping 
Duty Changed Circumstances Review Requested by the Dixon Ticonderoga 
Companies'' dated February 18, 2015 (Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum).
    \3\ See Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Cased Pencils from the 
People's Republic of China, 59 FR 66909 (December 28, 1994) (Order).
    \4\ See Certain Cased Pencils From the People's Republic of 
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 
Determination To Revoke Order In Part; 2010-2011, 78 FR 42932 (July 
18, 2013) (Revocation) and accompanying issues and decision 
memorandum (IDM).

DATES: Effective: April 9, 2015.

[[Page 19074]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sergio Balbontin, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6478.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On December 28, 1994, the Department published the Order on pencils 
from the PRC.\5\ On July 18, 2013, the Department revoked the Order on 
pencils from the PRC with respect to pencils exported by Beijing 
Dixon.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Order.
    \6\ See Revocation and accompanying IDM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On November 27, 2014, Beijing Dixon requsted that the Department 
conduct a CCR pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 
as amended (the Act), 19 CFR 351.216(b), and 19 CFR 351.221, to 
determine whether it is the successor-in-interest to Beijing Dixon for 
purposes of the Order.\7\ On February 26, 2015, the Department 
concurrently initiated and published the Preliminary Results of the CCR 
of the antidumping duty Order on pencils exported by Beijing Dixon.\8\ 
We invited comments from interested parties, but no party commented on 
the Preliminary Results or requested a hearing. This CCR is being 
conducted in accordance with section pursuant to section 751(b) of the 
Act, 19 CFR 351.216, and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See letter from Beijing Dixon to the Department dated 
November 27, 2014, ``Request for Changed Circumstances Review 
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.216 on behalf of Dixon Ticonderoga Company.''
    \8\ See Prelilminary Results and Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the order includes pencils from the PRC. 
Pencils are currently classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States (HTSUS) subheading 9609.1010. Although the HTSUS 
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the 
written product description is dispositive.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review

    Because no interested parties submitted comments on the 
Department's Preliminary Results, and because there is no other 
information or evidence on the record that calls into question the 
Preliminary Results, the Department adopts the reasoning and findings 
of fact outlined in the Prelilminary Results and Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum, and determines that Beijing Dixon is the successor-in-
interest to Beijing Dixon at the time of the Revocation.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Preliminary Results, 80 FR at 10457.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Application of the Revocation of the Order

    As explained in the Preliminary Resuts and the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum, the Revocation of the antidumping duty Order with respect 
to Beijing Dixon, as that entity existed at the time of Revocation, 
continues to apply to Beijing Dixon as currenly structured.

Instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection

    As a result of this determination, the Department finds that 
entries of subject merchandise exported by Beijing Dixon as currently 
structured should receive the same antidumping duty treatment with 
respect to cased pencils as its predecessor-in-interest. Accordingly, 
the Department will continue to instruct U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection to liquidate entries for Beijing Dixon without regard to 
antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to an 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the 
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of 
APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. See 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply with the 
regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. See 19 
CFR part 354.
    These final results of administrative review are issued and 
published in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i) of the Act 
and 19 CFR 351.216(e).

     Dated: April 3, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-08221 Filed 4-8-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                                                              Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 68 / Thursday, April 9, 2015 / Notices                                                  19073

                                               written briefs, within 120 days after the               in this review but covered in a prior                   Cost of Production Analysis
                                               date of publication of this notice, unless              segment of the proceeding, the cash                     Level of Trade Analysis
                                               extended, pursuant to section                           deposit rate will continue to be the                    CEP Offset
                                                                                                                                                               Calculation of Normal Value Based on
                                               751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.                                company-specific rate published for the                   Constructed Value
                                                                                                       most recent period in which the                         Currency Conversion
                                               Assessment Rates
                                                                                                       manufacturer or exporter participated;                Conclusion
                                                  Upon completion of the                               (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered             [FR Doc. 2015–08210 Filed 4–8–15; 8:45 am]
                                               administrative review, the Department                   in this review, a prior review, or the
                                               shall determine and U.S. Customs and                                                                          BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
                                                                                                       original less-than-fair-value
                                               Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,                   investigation but the manufacturer is,
                                               antidumping duties on all appropriate                   the cash deposit rate will be the rate                DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                               entries. If CP Kelco’s weighted-average                 established for the most recent period
                                               dumping margin is above de minimis in                   for the manufacturer of the                           International Trade Administration
                                               the final results of this review, we will               merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
                                               calculate an importer-specific                                                                                [A–570–827]
                                                                                                       rate for all other manufacturers or
                                               assessment rate on the basis of the ratio               exporters will continue to be 6.65
                                               of the total amount of antidumping                                                                            Certain Cased Pencils From the
                                                                                                       percent, the all-others rate established              People’s Republic of China: Final
                                               duties calculated for the importer’s                    in the less-than-fair-value
                                               examined sales and the total entered                                                                          Results of Antidumping Duty Changed
                                                                                                       investigation.9 These cash deposit                    Circumstances Review
                                               value of such sales in accordance with                  requirements, when imposed, shall
                                               19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If CP Kelco’s                     remain in effect until further notice.                AGENCY:   Enforcement and Compliance,
                                               weighted-average dumping margin is                                                                            International Trade Administration,
                                               zero or de minimis in the final results                 Notification to Importers                             Commerce.
                                               of review, or an importer-specific rate is                This notice also serves as a                        SUMMARY: On February 26, 2015, the
                                               zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP                preliminary reminder to importers of                  Department of Commerce (the
                                               to liquidate the appropriate entries                    their responsibility under 19 CFR                     Department) published the notice of
                                               without regard to dumping margins.7                     351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate                   initiation and the preliminary results of
                                                  The Department clarified its                         regarding the reimbursement of                        the changed circumstances review
                                               ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on                  antidumping duties prior to liquidation               (CCR) of the antidumping duty order on
                                               May 6, 2003.8 This clarification will                   of the relevant entries during this                   certain cased pencils (pencils) from the
                                               apply to entries of subject merchandise                 review period. Failure to comply with                 People’s Republic of China (PRC), in
                                               during the POR produced by CP Kelco                     this requirement could result in the                  which the Department preliminarily
                                               for which it did not know its                           Department’s presumption that                         determined that Beijing FILA Dixon
                                               merchandise was destined for the                        reimbursement of antidumping duties                   Stationery Co., Ltd.1 (Beijing Dixon), as
                                               United States. In such instances, we will               occurred and the subsequent assessment                currently structured under its new
                                               instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed                   of double antidumping duties.                         business license, is the successor-in-
                                               entries at the all-others rate if there is no             We are issuing and publishing these                 interest to Beijing Dixon.2 For these
                                               rate for the intermediate company(ies)                  results in accordance with sections                   final results, the Department continues
                                               involved in the transaction.                            751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.                   to find that Beijing Dixon is the
                                                  We intend to issue instructions to                                                                         successor-in-interest to Beijing Dixon as
                                               CBP 15 days after publication of the                      Dated: April 2, 2015.
                                                                                                                                                             that entity existed at the time the
                                               final results of this review.                           Paul Piquado,
                                                                                                                                                             Department revoked the order 3 with
                                                                                                       Assistant Secretary for Enforcement &                 respect to Beijing Dixon.4 Accordingly,
                                               Cash Deposit Requirements                               Compliance.                                           the Revocation of the antidumping duty
                                                  The following deposit requirements                                                                         Order with respect to Beijing Dixon
                                                                                                       Appendix I
                                               will be effective upon publication of the                                                                     continues to apply to Beijing Dixon as
                                               notice of final results of administrative               List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
                                                                                                       Decision Memorandum                                   currenly structured.
                                               review for all shipments of subject
                                                                                                                                                             DATES: Effective: April 9, 2015.
                                               merchandise entered, or withdrawn                       Summary
                                               from warehouse, for consumption on or                   Background
                                                                                                                                                               1 A/k/a Beijing Dixon Ticonderoga Stationery
                                               after the date of publication as provided               Scope of The Order
                                                                                                       Methodology                                           Company, Ltd., and Beijing Dixon Stationery
                                               by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The                                                                      Company.
                                                                                                         Fair Value Comparisons
                                               cash deposit rate for CP Kelco Oy will                    Product Comparisons
                                                                                                                                                               2 See Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s

                                               be the rate established in the final                                                                          Republic of China: Notice of Initiation and
                                                                                                         Determination of Comparison Margins                 Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed
                                               results of this administrative review                     Results of Differential Pricing Analysis            Circumstances Review, 80 FR 10457 (February 26,
                                               except if the rate is de minimis within                   Date of Sale                                        2015) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying
                                               the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in                   U.S. Price                                          memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty Order on
                                               which case the cash deposit rate will be                  Export Price                                        Certain Cased Pencils from the People’s Republic of
                                                                                                         Constructed Export Price                            China: Decision Memorandum for Preliminary
                                               zero; (2) for merchandise exported by                                                                         Results of Antidumping Duty Changed
                                               manufacturers or exporters not covered                    U.S. Sample Sales
                                                                                                         Normal Value                                        Circumstances Review Requested by the Dixon
                                                                                                         Home Market Viability as Comparison                 Ticonderoga Companies’’ dated February 18, 2015
                                                 7 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of                                                               (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
                                                                                                            Market
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                               the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and                                                                         3 See Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Cased
                                                                                                         Calculation of NV Based On Comparison
                                               Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping                                                                        Pencils from the People’s Republic of China, 59 FR
                                               Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102            Market Prices                                    66909 (December 28, 1994) (Order).
                                               (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for               Home Market Sample Sales                              4 See Certain Cased Pencils From the People’s
                                               Reviews).                                                                                                     Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping
                                                 8 For a full discussion of this clarification, see       9 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders:           Duty Administrative Review and Determination To
                                               Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:        Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland,         Revoke Order In Part; 2010–2011, 78 FR 42932 (July
                                               Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954           Mexico, the Netherlands and Sweden, 70 FR 39734       18, 2013) (Revocation) and accompanying issues
                                               (May 6, 2003).                                          (July 11, 2005).                                      and decision memorandum (IDM).



                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:13 Apr 08, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00015   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM   09APN1


                                               19074                          Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 68 / Thursday, April 9, 2015 / Notices

                                               FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        Prelilminary Results and Preliminary                   DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                               Sergio Balbontin, AD/CVD Operations,                    Decision Memorandum, and determines
                                               Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,                   that Beijing Dixon is the successor-in-                National Oceanic and Atmospheric
                                               International Trade Administration,                     interest to Beijing Dixon at the time of               Administration
                                               Department of Commerce, 14th Street                     the Revocation.10
                                               and Constitution Avenue NW.,                                                                                   Proposed Information Collection;
                                               Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)                  Application of the Revocation of the                   Comment Request; Pacific Islands
                                               482–6478.                                               Order                                                  Region Coral Reef Ecosystems Permit
                                                                                                                                                              Form
                                               SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                                 As explained in the Preliminary
                                               Background                                              Resuts and the Preliminary Decision                    AGENCY: National Oceanic and
                                                                                                       Memorandum, the Revocation of the                      Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
                                                 On December 28, 1994, the                                                                                    Commerce.
                                               Department published the Order on                       antidumping duty Order with respect to
                                                                                                       Beijing Dixon, as that entity existed at               ACTION: Notice.
                                               pencils from the PRC.5 On July 18, 2013,
                                               the Department revoked the Order on                     the time of Revocation, continues to                   SUMMARY:    The Department of
                                               pencils from the PRC with respect to                    apply to Beijing Dixon as currenly                     Commerce, as part of its continuing
                                               pencils exported by Beijing Dixon.6                     structured.                                            effort to reduce paperwork and
                                                 On November 27, 2014, Beijing Dixon                   Instructions to U.S. Customs and                       respondent burden, invites the general
                                               requsted that the Department conduct a                                                                         public and other Federal agencies to
                                                                                                       Border Protection
                                               CCR pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the                                                                       take this opportunity to comment on
                                               Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),                  As a result of this determination, the              proposed and/or continuing information
                                               19 CFR 351.216(b), and 19 CFR 351.221,                  Department finds that entries of subject               collections, as required by the
                                               to determine whether it is the successor-               merchandise exported by Beijing Dixon                  Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
                                               in-interest to Beijing Dixon for purposes               as currently structured should receive                 DATES: Written comments must be
                                               of the Order.7 On February 26, 2015, the                the same antidumping duty treatment                    submitted on or before June 8, 2015.
                                               Department concurrently initiated and                   with respect to cased pencils as its                   ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
                                               published the Preliminary Results of the                predecessor-in-interest. Accordingly,                  to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
                                               CCR of the antidumping duty Order on                                                                           Paperwork Clearance Officer,
                                                                                                       the Department will continue to instruct
                                               pencils exported by Beijing Dixon.8 We                                                                         Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
                                                                                                       U.S. Customs and Border Protection to
                                               invited comments from interested                                                                               14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
                                                                                                       liquidate entries for Beijing Dixon
                                               parties, but no party commented on the                                                                         Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
                                               Preliminary Results or requested a                      without regard to antidumping duties.
                                                                                                                                                              Internet at JJessup@doc.gov).
                                               hearing. This CCR is being conducted in                 Administrative Protective Order                        FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                               accordance with section pursuant to                                                                            Requests for additional information or
                                               section 751(b) of the Act, 19 CFR                         This notice also serves as a reminder
                                                                                                                                                              copies of the information collection
                                               351.216, and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3).                      to parties subject to an administrative
                                                                                                                                                              instrument and instructions should be
                                                                                                       protective order (APO) of their                        directed to Walter Ikehara, (808) 725–
                                               Scope of the Order
                                                                                                       responsibility concerning the return or                5175 or Walter.Ikehara@noaa.gov.
                                                 The merchandise subject to the order                  destruction of proprietary information
                                               includes pencils from the PRC. Pencils                                                                         SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                                                                       disclosed under APO in accordance
                                               are currently classifiable under                        with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues                   I. Abstract
                                               Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the                       to govern business proprietary                            This request is for extension of a
                                               United States (HTSUS) subheading                        information in this segment of the                     current information collection.
                                               9609.1010. Although the HTSUS                           proceeding. Timely written notification                   National Marine Fisheries Service
                                               subheadings are provided for                            of the return or destruction of APO                    (NMFS) requires, as codified under 50
                                               convenience and customs purposes, the                                                                          CFR part 665, any person (1) fishing for,
                                                                                                       materials, or conversion to judicial
                                               written product description is                                                                                 taking, retaining, or using a vessel to
                                                                                                       protective order, is hereby requested.
                                               dispositive.9                                                                                                  fish for Western Pacific coral reef
                                                                                                       See 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to
                                               Final Results of Changed                                comply with the regulations and the                    ecosystem management unit species in
                                               Circumstances Review                                    terms of an APO is a sanctionable                      the designated low-use Marine
                                                                                                       violation. See 19 CFR part 354.                        Protected Areas, (2) fishing for any of
                                                  Because no interested parties
                                                                                                                                                              these species using gear not specifically
                                               submitted comments on the                                 These final results of administrative                allowed in the regulations, or (3) fishing
                                               Department’s Preliminary Results, and                   review are issued and published in                     for, taking, or retaining any Potentially
                                               because there is no other information or                accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and                 Harvested Coral Reef Taxa in the coral
                                               evidence on the record that calls into                  777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216(e).               reef ecosystem regulatory area, to obtain
                                               question the Preliminary Results, the
                                                                                                         Dated: April 3, 2015.                                and carry a permit. A receiving vessel
                                               Department adopts the reasoning and
                                                                                                       Paul Piquado,                                          owner must also have a transshipment
                                               findings of fact outlined in the
                                                                                                       Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
                                                                                                                                                              permit for at-sea transshipment of coral
                                                 5 See Order.                                          Compliance.                                            reef ecosystem management unit
                                                                                                                                                              species. The permit application form
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                 6 See Revocation and accompanying IDM.                [FR Doc. 2015–08221 Filed 4–8–15; 8:45 am]
                                                 7 See letter from Beijing Dixon to the Department                                                            provides basic information about the
                                                                                                       BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
                                               dated November 27, 2014, ‘‘Request for Changed                                                                 permit applicant, vessel, fishing gear
                                               Circumstances Review pursuant to 19 CFR 351.216                                                                and method, target species, projected
                                               on behalf of Dixon Ticonderoga Company.’’
                                                 8 See Prelilminary Results and Preliminary
                                                                                                                                                              fishing effort, etc., for use by NMFS and
                                               Decision Memorandum.                                                                                           the Western Pacific Fishery
                                                 9 For a complete description of the scope of the                                                             Management Council in determining
                                               Order, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4.          10 See   Preliminary Results, 80 FR at 10457.        eligibility for permit issuance. The


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   15:13 Apr 08, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00016    Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM   09APN1



Document Created: 2015-12-18 11:23:49
Document Modified: 2015-12-18 11:23:49
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesEffective: April 9, 2015.
ContactSergio Balbontin, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6478.
FR Citation80 FR 19073 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR