80_FR_22240 80 FR 22164 - Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Rescission of 2013-2014 Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review

80 FR 22164 - Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Rescission of 2013-2014 Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 76 (April 21, 2015)

Page Range22164-22165
FR Document2015-09206

The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') is conducting a new shipper review (``NSR'') of the antidumping duty order on crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules (solar cells), from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''). The NSR covers one exporter and producer of subject merchandise, Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd. (``DMEGC''). The period of review (``POR'') is December 1, 2013, through May 31, 2014. The Department preliminarily determines that DMEGC's sale to the United States was not bona fide; therefore, we are preliminarily rescinding this NSR. Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary results of this review.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 2015) 
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22164-22165]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09206]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-979]


Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled 
Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary 
Rescission of 2013--2014 Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') is conducting 
a new shipper review (``NSR'') of the antidumping duty order on 
crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into 
modules (solar cells), from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''). 
The NSR covers one exporter and producer of subject merchandise, 
Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd. (``DMEGC''). The period of 
review (``POR'') is December 1, 2013, through May 31, 2014. The 
Department preliminarily determines that DMEGC's sale to the United 
States was not bona fide; therefore, we are preliminarily rescinding 
this NSR. Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary 
results of this review.

DATES: Effective: April 21, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2769.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 28, 2014, the Department published a notice of initiation 
of a new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on solar cells 
from the PRC.\1\ The Department subsequently issued an antidumping duty 
questionnaire, and supplemental questionnaires, to DMEGC and received 
timely responses thereto. Also, interested parties submitted comments 
on surrogate country and surrogate value selection. The Department 
extended the deadline for issuing the preliminary results of this 
review until April 7, 2015.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not 
Assembled into Modules, from the People's Republic of China: 
Initiation of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 79 FR 43710 (July 
28, 2014).
    \2\ See the memoranda to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, from 
Jeff Pedersen, International Trade Analyst, Office IV, Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled, ``Extension of 
Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper 
Review'' dated January 13, 2015 and February 11, 2015 and the 
memorandum to Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary 
for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, from Valerie 
Ellis, International Trade Analyst, Office IV, Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled, ``Extension of Deadline 
for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review'' 
dated March 16, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the order is crystalline silicon 
photovoltaic cells, and modules, laminates, and panels, consisting of 
crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not partially or 
fully assembled into other products, including, but not limited to, 
modules, laminates, panels and building integrated materials.\3\ 
Merchandise covered by this review is classifiable under subheadings 
8501.61.0000, 8507.20.80, 8541.40.6020, 8541.40.6030, and 8501.31.8000 
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). 
Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes, our written description of the scope of the order is 
dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see 
Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Antidumping and Countervailing Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, 
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, 
entititled ``Preliminary Rescission of the 2013-2014 Antidumping 
Duty New Shipper Review: Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 
Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the People's Republic of 
China'' issued concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice 
(``Preliminary Decision Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'') and 19 
CFR 351.214. For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically 
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available 
to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central 
Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In 
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed directly on the internet at http://www.trade.gov/enforcement/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the 
electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are 
identical in content.

Preliminary Rescission of the Antidumping New Shipper Review of DMEGC

    As discussed in the Bona Fide Sales Analysis Memorandum,\4\ the 
Department preliminarily finds that the sale made by DMEGC to the 
United States is not a bona fide sale. The Department reached this 
conclusion based on the totality of circumstances surrounding the 
reported sale, including, among other things, the price and quantity of 
the sale and DMEGC's

[[Page 22165]]

failure to provide evidence that the subject merchandise was resold at 
a profit. Because the non-bona fide sale was the only reported sale of 
subject merchandise during the POR, and thus there are no reviewable 
transactions on this record, we are preliminarily rescinding the 
instant administrative review. See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). Because much 
of the factual information used in our analysis of DMEGC's sale 
involves business proprietary information, a full discussion of the 
basis for our preliminary determination is set forth in the Memorandum 
to Howard Smith, Acting Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, 
``Preliminary Bona Fide Sales Analysis for Hengdian Group DMEGC 
Magnetics Co., Ltd.,'' dated April 7, 2015, which is on the record of 
this proceeding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Memorandum from Jeffrey Pedersen, International Trade 
Analyst, Office IV AD/CVD Operations, to Howard Smith, Acting 
Director, Office IV, AD/CVD Operations entitled ``2013-2014 
Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Crystalline Silicon 
Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the 
People's Republic of China: Preliminary Bona Fide Sales Analysis for 
Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd.'' dated concurrently with 
and hereby adopted by this notice (``Bona Fide Sales Analysis 
Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Public Comment

    Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days 
after the date of publication of the preliminary results of review.\5\ 
Rebuttals to case briefs may be filed no later than five days after the 
briefs are filed. All rebuttal comments must be limited to comments 
raised in the case briefs.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c).
    \6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a 
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement & 
Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days after the date 
of publication of this notice.\7\ Requests should contain the party's 
name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, and a 
list of the issues to be discussed. Oral argument presentations will be 
limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is 
made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department 
of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20230, at a date and time to be determined.\8\ Parties should confirm 
by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days 
before the scheduled date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
    \8\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    All submissions, with limited exceptions, must be filed 
electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be 
received successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic 
records system, ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time (``ET'') on the due 
date. Documents excepted from the electronic submission requirements 
must be filed manually (i.e., in paper form) with the APO/Dockets Unit 
in Room 18022, and stamped with the date and time of receipt by 5 p.m. 
ET on the due date.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order 
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department intends to issue the final results of this NSR, 
which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised in any 
briefs received, no later than 90 days after the date these preliminary 
results of review are issued pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of 
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ``Act'').

Assessment Rates

    If the Department proceeds to a final rescission of DMEGC's NSR, 
the assessment rate to which DMEGC's shipments will be subject will not 
be affected by this review. However, the Department initiated an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on solar cells from 
the PRC covering numerous exporters, including DMEGC, and the period 
December 1, 2013 through November 30, 2014, which encompasses the POR 
of this NSR.\10\ Thus, if the Department proceeds to a final 
rescission, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 
to continue to suspend entries during the period December 1, 2013 
through November 30, 2014 of subject merchandise exported by DMEGC 
until CBP receives instructions relating to the administrative review 
of this order covering the period December 1, 2013 through November 30, 
2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 6041, 6042 (February 4, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If the Department does not proceed to a final rescission of this 
new shipper review, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we will calculate 
importer-specific (or customer) assessment rates based on the final 
results of this review. However, pursuant to the Department's 
refinement to its assessment practice in NME cases, for entries that 
were not reported in the U.S. sales database submitted by DMEGC, the 
Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide 
rate.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market 
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    Effective upon publication of the final rescission or the final 
results of this NSR, pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act 
and 19 CFR 351.214(e), the Department will instruct CBP to discontinue 
the option of posting a bond or security in lieu of a cash deposit for 
entries of subject merchandise by DMEGC. If the Department proceeds to 
a final rescission of this new shipper review, the cash deposit rate 
will continue to be the PRC-wide rate for DMEGC because the Department 
will not have determined an individual margin of dumping for DMEGC. If 
the Department issues final results for this new shipper review, the 
Department will instruct CBP to collect cash deposits, effective upon 
the publication of the final results, at the rates established therein.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of 
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

     Dated: April 7, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

1. Scope
2. Bona Fide Sales Analysis

[FR Doc. 2015-09206 Filed 4-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

22164 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 76 / Tuesday, April 21, 2015 / Notices Affected Public: Business or other for- period of review (‘‘POR’’) is December 1, covered by this review is classifiable profit organizations. 2013, through May 31, 2014. The under subheadings 8501.61.0000, Estimated Number of Respondents: Department preliminarily determines 8507.20.80, 8541.40.6020, 8541.40.6030, 1,821,891. that DMEGC’s sale to the United States and 8501.31.8000 of the Harmonized Estimated Time per Response: 5 was not bona fide; therefore, we are Tariff Schedule of the United States seconds to 2 hours per response. preliminarily rescinding this NSR. (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS Estimated Total Annual Burden Interested parties are invited to subheadings are provided for Hours: 78,576 hours. comment on the preliminary results of convenience and customs purposes, our Estimated Total Annual Cost to this review. written description of the scope of the Public: $0. order is dispositive. DATES: Effective: April 21, 2015. IV. Request for Comments FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Methodology Comments are invited on: (a) Whether Jeffrey Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, The Department is conducting this the proposed collection of information Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, review in accordance with section is necessary for the proper performance International Trade Administration, 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as of the functions of the agency, including Department of Commerce, 1401 amended (‘‘the Act’’) and 19 CFR whether the information shall have Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 351.214. For a full description of the practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2769. methodology underlying our agency’s estimate of the burden SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: conclusions, see the Preliminary (including hours and cost) of the Decision Memorandum. The proposed collection of information; (c) Background Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a ways to enhance the quality, utility, and On July 28, 2014, the Department public document and is on file clarity of the information to be published a notice of initiation of a new electronically via Enforcement and collected; and (d) ways to minimize the shipper review of the antidumping duty Compliance’s Antidumping and burden of the collection of information order on solar cells from the PRC.1 The Countervailing Duty Centralized on respondents, including through the Department subsequently issued an Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). use of automated collection techniques antidumping duty questionnaire, and ACCESS is available to registered users or other forms of information supplemental questionnaires, to DMEGC at http://access.trade.gov and in the technology. and received timely responses thereto. Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the Comments submitted in response to Also, interested parties submitted main Department of Commerce this notice will be summarized and/or comments on surrogate country and building. In addition, a complete included in the request for OMB surrogate value selection. The version of the Preliminary Decision approval of this information collection; Department extended the deadline for Memorandum can be accessed directly they also will become a matter of public issuing the preliminary results of this on the internet at http://www.trade.gov/ record. review until April 7, 2015.2 enforcement/. The signed Preliminary Dated: April 16, 2015. Scope of the Order Decision Memorandum and the Mickelson, electronic versions of the Preliminary The merchandise covered by the order Decision Memorandum are identical in Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. is crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, content. and modules, laminates, and panels, [FR Doc. 2015–09095 Filed 4–20–15; 8:45 am] consisting of crystalline silicon Preliminary Rescission of the BILLING CODE 3510–33–P photovoltaic cells, whether or not Antidumping New Shipper Review of partially or fully assembled into other DMEGC DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE products, including, but not limited to, As discussed in the Bona Fide Sales modules, laminates, panels and building Analysis Memorandum,4 the International Trade Administration integrated materials.3 Merchandise Department preliminarily finds that the [A–570–979] sale made by DMEGC to the United 1 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the States is not a bona fide sale. The Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Department reached this conclusion Whether or Not Assembled Into Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 79 FR based on the totality of circumstances 43710 (July 28, 2014). surrounding the reported sale, Modules, From the People’s Republic 2 See the memoranda to Christian Marsh, Deputy of China: Preliminary Rescission of including, among other things, the price Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 2013—2014 Antidumping Duty New Countervailing Duty Operations, from Jeff Pedersen, and quantity of the sale and DMEGC’s Shipper Review International Trade Analyst, Office IV, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, the 2013–2014 Antidumping Duty New Shipper AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, entitled, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Review: Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, International Trade Administration, Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the Review’’ dated January 13, 2015 and February 11, People’s Republic of China’’ issued concurrently Commerce. 2015 and the memorandum to Gary Taverman, with and hereby adopted by this notice SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for (‘‘Preliminary Decision Memorandum’’). (‘‘the Department’’) is conducting a new Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 4 See Memorandum from Jeffrey Pedersen, shipper review (‘‘NSR’’) of the from Valerie Ellis, International Trade Analyst, International Trade Analyst, Office IV AD/CVD antidumping duty order on crystalline Office IV, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Howard Smith, Acting Director, Operations, entitled, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for Office IV, AD/CVD Operations entitled ‘‘2013–2014 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of not assembled into modules (solar Shipper Review’’ dated March 16, 2015. Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or cells), from the People’s Republic of 3 For a complete description of the scope of the Not Assembled into Modules, from the People’s China (‘‘PRC’’). The NSR covers one order, see Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Republic of China: Preliminary Bona Fide Sales Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Analysis for Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics exporter and producer of subject Countervailing Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Co., Ltd.’’ dated concurrently with and hereby merchandise, Hengdian Group DMEGC Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and adopted by this notice (‘‘Bona Fide Sales Analysis Magnetics Co., Ltd. (‘‘DMEGC’’). The Compliance, entititled ‘‘Preliminary Rescission of Memorandum’’). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:07 Apr 20, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM 21APN1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 76 / Tuesday, April 21, 2015 / Notices 22165 failure to provide evidence that the and time of receipt by 5 p.m. ET on the deposit for entries of subject subject merchandise was resold at a due date.9 merchandise by DMEGC. If the profit. Because the non-bona fide sale The Department intends to issue the Department proceeds to a final was the only reported sale of subject final results of this NSR, which will rescission of this new shipper review, merchandise during the POR, and thus include the results of its analysis of the cash deposit rate will continue to be there are no reviewable transactions on issues raised in any briefs received, no the PRC-wide rate for DMEGC because this record, we are preliminarily later than 90 days after the date these the Department will not have rescinding the instant administrative preliminary results of review are issued determined an individual margin of review. See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of dumping for DMEGC. If the Department Because much of the factual information the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the issues final results for this new shipper used in our analysis of DMEGC’s sale ‘‘Act’’). review, the Department will instruct involves business proprietary Assessment Rates CBP to collect cash deposits, effective information, a full discussion of the upon the publication of the final results, basis for our preliminary determination If the Department proceeds to a final at the rates established therein. is set forth in the Memorandum to rescission of DMEGC’s NSR, the Howard Smith, Acting Director, AD/ assessment rate to which DMEGC’s Notification to Importers CVD Operations, Office IV, ‘‘Preliminary shipments will be subject will not be This notice also serves as a Bona Fide Sales Analysis for Hengdian affected by this review. However, the preliminary reminder to importers of Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd.,’’ Department initiated an administrative their responsibility under 19 CFR dated April 7, 2015, which is on the review of the antidumping duty order 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate record of this proceeding. on solar cells from the PRC covering regarding the reimbursement of numerous exporters, including DMEGC, antidumping duties prior to liquidation Public Comment and the period December 1, 2013 of the relevant entries during this Interested parties may submit case through November 30, 2014, which review period. Failure to comply with briefs no later than 30 days after the encompasses the POR of this NSR.10 this requirement could result in the date of publication of the preliminary Thus, if the Department proceeds to a Department’s presumption that results of review.5 Rebuttals to case final rescission, we will instruct U.S. reimbursement of antidumping duties briefs may be filed no later than five Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to occurred and the subsequent assessment days after the briefs are filed. All continue to suspend entries during the of double antidumping duties. rebuttal comments must be limited to period December 1, 2013 through We are issuing and publishing these comments raised in the case briefs.6 November 30, 2014 of subject results in accordance with sections Interested parties who wish to request merchandise exported by DMEGC until 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. a hearing must submit a written request CBP receives instructions relating to the administrative review of this order Dated: April 7, 2015. to the Assistant Secretary for covering the period December 1, 2013 Ronald K. Lorentzen, Enforcement & Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 through November 30, 2014. Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement If the Department does not proceed to and Compliance. days after the date of publication of this notice.7 Requests should contain the a final rescission of this new shipper Appendix I party’s name, address, and telephone review, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we will calculate List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary number, the number of participants, and Decision Memorandum a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral importer-specific (or customer) argument presentations will be limited assessment rates based on the final 1. Scope to issues raised in the briefs. If a request results of this review. However, 2. Bona Fide Sales Analysis for a hearing is made, the Department pursuant to the Department’s refinement [FR Doc. 2015–09206 Filed 4–20–15; 8:45 am] intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. to its assessment practice in NME cases, BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Department of Commerce, 14th Street for entries that were not reported in the and Constitution Avenue NW., U.S. sales database submitted by Washington, DC 20230, at a date and DMEGC, the Department will instruct DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE time to be determined.8 Parties should CBP to liquidate such entries at the confirm by telephone the date, time, and PRC-wide rate.11 International Trade Administration location of the hearing two days before Cash Deposit Requirements [A–570–916] the scheduled date. Effective upon publication of the final All submissions, with limited Laminated Woven Sacks From the rescission or the final results of this exceptions, must be filed electronically People’s Republic of China: Final NSR, pursuant to section using ACCESS. An electronically filed Results of Antidumping Duty 751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act and 19 CFR document must be received successfully Administrative Review; 2013–2014 351.214(e), the Department will instruct in its entirety by the Department’s CBP to discontinue the option of posting AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, electronic records system, ACCESS, by a bond or security in lieu of a cash International Trade Administration, 5 p.m. Eastern Time (‘‘ET’’) on the due date. Documents excepted from the Commerce. 9 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty SUMMARY: On January 28, 2015, the electronic submission requirements Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; must be filed manually (i.e., in paper Department of Commerce (the Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES form) with the APO/Dockets Unit in 39263 (July 6, 2011). ‘‘Department’’) published the Room 18022, and stamped with the date 10 See Initiation of Antidumping and Preliminary Results 1 of the 2013–2014 Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 6041, 6042 (February 4, 2015). 1 See Laminated Woven Sacks from the People’s 5 See 19 CFR 351.309(c). 11 For a full discussion of this practice, see Non- Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 6 See 19 CFR 351.309(d). Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013– 7 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 2014, 80 FR 4537 (January 28, 2015) (‘‘Preliminary 8 See 19 CFR 351.310(d). (October 24, 2011). Continued VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:07 Apr 20, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM 21APN1


Document Created: 2015-12-16 08:33:44
Document Modified: 2015-12-16 08:33:44
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesEffective: April 21, 2015.
ContactJeffrey Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2769.
FR Citation80 FR 22164 
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR