80 FR 22251 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fees Schedule
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 76 (April 21, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 76 (April 21, 2015)
| Page Range | 22251-22254 | |
| FR Document | 2015-09069 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 22251-22254] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-09069] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-74733; File No. SR-C2-2015-007] Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fees Schedule April 15, 2015. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that on April 10, 2015, C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (the ``Exchange'' or ``C2'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the [[Page 22252]] Exchange's Web site (http://www.c2exchange.com/Legal/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule.\3\ Specifically, the Exchange proposes to amend its fees for the Russell 2000 Index (``RUT''). As of April 1, 2015, RUT is listed exclusively on C2 and Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (``CBOE''). As such, the Exchange proposes to make conforming changes to its Fees Schedule. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ C2 initially filed the proposed fee change on March 31, 2015 (SR-C2-2015-004). On April 10, 2015, C2 withdrew that filing and submitted this filing. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Currently the Exchange assesses different fees and rebates for simple and complex RUT orders. Specifically, for simple, non-complex RUT orders, the Exchange assesses the following per-contract fees structure (rebates in parentheses): ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Maker Taker fee ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Public Customer................................... * ($.75) $.80 C2 Market-Maker................................... .00 .80 All Other Origins (Professional Customer, Firm, .50 .80 Broker/Dealer, non-C2 Market-Maker, JBO, etc.)... Trades on the Open................................ .00 .00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ For complex orders in RUT, the Exchange currently assesses the following per-contract fees structure (rebates in parentheses): ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Maker fee/ Taker fee/ (rebate) (rebate) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Public Customer................................... * ($.75) * ($.75) C2 Market-Maker................................... .85 .85 All Other Origins (Professional Customer, Firm, .85 .85 Broker/Dealer, non-C2 Market-Maker, JBO, etc.)... Trades on the Open................................ .00 .00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Exchange notes that for both simple and complex RUT orders, rebates do not apply to orders that trade with Public Customer complex orders. In such circumstances, there is no fee or rebate. In light of the new licensing arrangement for RUT, the Exchange seeks to amend its RUT fees structure. Specifically, the Exchange seeks to eliminate the Maker-Taker fee structure for RUT and instead adopt standard transaction fees. The Exchange also proposes to eliminate the Public Customer rebates for RUT, as well as change the current fee amounts assessed. The Exchange notes that Trades on the Open will continue to not be assessed a fee or rebate. For both simple and non-complex RUT orders, the Exchange proposes to assess the following per-contract fees: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ RUT ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Public Customer.............................................. $.15 C2 Market-Maker.............................................. .35 All Other Origins (Professional Customer, Firm, Broker/ .55 Dealer, non-C2 Market-Maker, JBO, etc.)..................... Trades on the Open........................................... .00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Additionally, the Exchange notes that it currently assesses an Index License Surcharge for RUT (``RUT Surcharge'') of $0.30 per contract for all non-Public Customer orders. The Exchange now proposes to increase the RUT Surcharge from $0.30 to 0.45 per contract in order to recoup the increased costs associated with the RUT license. The Exchange will still be subsidizing the costs of the RUT license. Finally, the Exchange proposes to delete sections (B) and (D) from Section 1 of the Fees Schedule. The Exchange notes that as of January 2015, the fees for simple, non-complex orders in equities, multiply- listed index, ETF, and ETN options classes are the same and the fees for complex orders in equities, multiply-listed index, ETF, and ETN options classes are the same (i.e., there is no longer a distinction between fees and rebates for equities options class and multiply-listed index, ETF, and ETN options classes). As such, the Exchange proposes to consolidate its Fees Schedule and add ``equities'' to Section 1A and the current Section 1C (which will now be renumbered as ``B''). The Exchange believes the proposed rule change will make the Fees Schedule easier to read and alleviate potential confusion. The Exchange notes that no substantive changes are being made by this change. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\4\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \5\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\6\ which requires that Exchange rules provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its Trading Permit Holders and other persons using its facilities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange believes it is reasonable to charge different fee amounts to different user types in the manner proposed because the proposed fees are consistent with the price differentiation that exists today at other options exchanges (for example, the proposed fees are comparable with fees for other index option products, traded on CBOE - including RUT \7\). Additionally, while the Exchange notes that the fee structure for RUT is changing from a Maker-Taker structure to a standard transaction fees structure, the Exchange believes the proposed fee amounts for RUT orders are reasonable because the proposed fee amounts are within the range of standard transaction fee amounts [[Page 22253]] charged for RUT at another exchange (i.e., CBOE).\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See CBOE Fees Schedule, Specified Proprietary Index Options Rate Table. \8\ See CBOE Fees Schedule, Specified Proprietary Index Options Rate Table, which shows that standard transaction fees for RUT orders range from $0.18 per contract to $0.65 per contract. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange believes it is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to eliminate the rebates for Public Customers for RUT transactions because the Exchange devotes a lot of resources to developing and maintain an exclusively-listed product and therefore does not desire to offer a rebate associated with exclusively-listed products. The Exchange notes that this proposed change will apply to all Public Customers for all RUT transactions. The Exchange also believes that it is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to assess lower fees to Public Customers as compared to other market participants because Public Customer order flow enhances liquidity on the Exchange for the benefit of all market participants. Specifically, Public Customer liquidity benefits all market participants by providing more trading opportunities, which attracts Market-Makers. An increase in the activity of these market participants in turn facilitates tighter spreads, which may cause an additional corresponding increase in order flow from other market participants. Moreover, the options industry has a long history of providing preferential pricing to Public Customers, and the Exchange's current Fees Schedule currently does so in many places, as do the fees structures of many other exchanges. Finally, all fee amounts listed as applying to Public Customers will be applied equally to all Public Customers (meaning that all Public Customers will be assessed the same amount). The Exchange believes that it is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to, assess lower fees to Market-Makers as compared to other market participants other than Public Customers because Market- Makers, unlike other market participants, take on a number of obligations, including quoting obligations, that other market participants do not have. Further, these lower fees offered to Market- Makers are intended to incent Market-Makers to quote and trade more on C2, thereby providing more trading opportunities for all market participants. Finally, all fee amounts listed as applying to Market- Makers will be applied equally to all Market-Makers (meaning that all Market-Makers will be assessed the same amount). Similarly, the Exchange notes that the RUT fee amounts for each separate type of other market participants will be assessed equally to all such market participants (i.e. all Broker-Dealer orders will be assessed the same amount, all Joint Back-Office orders will be assessed the same amount, etc.). The Exchange believes increasing the RUT Surcharge is reasonable because the Exchange still pays more for the RUT license than the amount of the proposed RUT Surcharge (meaning that the Exchange is, and will still be, subsidizing the costs of the RUT license). This increase is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the increased amount will be assessed to all market participants to whom the RUT Surcharge applies. Not applying the RUT Index License Surcharge Fee to Public Customer orders is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because this is designed to attract Public Customer RUT orders, which increases liquidity and provides greater trading opportunities to all market participants. The Exchange believes that the proposed new fee structure for simple and complex RUT options is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the structure and fee amounts are identical for both simple and complex RUT orders. Finally, the Exchange believes that eliminating sections B and D of Section 1 of the Fees Schedule and consolidating it with current sections A and C, respectively, maintains clarity in the Fees Schedule and promotes just and equitable principles of trade by eliminating potential confusion and removing impediments to and perfecting the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition C2 does not believe that the proposed rule changes will impose any burden on competition that are not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because, while different fees are assessed to different market participants in some circumstances, these different market participants have different obligations and different circumstances as discussed above. For example, Market-Makers have quoting obligations that other market participants do not have. Further, the proposed fees structure for RUT is intended to encourage more trading of RUT, which brings liquidity to the Exchange and benefits all market participants. The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because RUT will now be exclusively listed on C2 (and CBOE). To the extent that the proposed changes make C2 a more attractive marketplace for market participants at other exchanges, such market participants are welcome to become C2 market participants. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \10\ thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-C2-2015-007 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. [[Page 22254]] All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2015-007. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2015-007 and should be submitted on or before May 12, 2015. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brent J. Fields, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015-09069 Filed 4-20-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 76 / Tuesday, April 21, 2015 / Notices 22251
information by its employees.21 The rules and applicable federal securities (10) A minimum of 100,000 Shares
Exchange states that the Adviser is not laws. will be outstanding at the
a broker-dealer, and is not affiliated (3) The Exchange has appropriate commencement of trading on the
with any broker-dealer. In addition, the rules to facilitate transactions in the Exchange.
Exchange states that in the event (a) the Shares during all trading sessions. This approval order is based on all of
Adviser becomes affiliated with a (4) Prior to the commencement of the Exchange’s representations,
broker-dealer or registers as a broker- trading, the Exchange will inform its including those set forth above and in
dealer, or (b) any new adviser or sub- members in an Information Circular of the Notice. For the foregoing reasons,
adviser is a registered broker-dealer or the special characteristics and risks the Commission finds that the proposed
becomes affiliated with a broker-dealer, associated with trading the Shares. rule change is consistent with section
it will implement a fire wall with Specifically, the Information Circular 6(b)(5) of the Act 25 and the rules and
respect to its relevant personnel and/or will discuss the following: (a) The regulations thereunder applicable to a
such broker-dealer affiliate, as procedures for purchases and national securities exchange.
applicable, regarding access to redemptions of Shares in Creation Units
(and that Shares are not individually IV. Conclusion
information concerning the composition
and/or changes to the portfolio and will redeemable); (b) Nasdaq Rule 2111A, It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
be subject to procedures designed to which imposes suitability obligations on section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,26
prevent the use and dissemination of Nasdaq members with respect to that the proposed rule change (SR–
material nonpublic information recommending transactions in the NASDAQ–2015–013) be, and it hereby
regarding such portfolio.22 Shares to customers; (c) the is, approved.
dissemination of information regarding For the Commission, by the Division of
FINRA, on behalf of the Exchange,
the Intraday Indicative Value through Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
will communicate as needed regarding
major index service providers such as authority.27
trading in the Shares and other
NASDAQ OMX proprietary index data Brent J. Fields,
exchange-traded securities with other
services or other major market Secretary.
markets and other entities that are ISG
proprietary index services; (d) the risks
members, and FINRA, on behalf of the [FR Doc. 2015–09064 Filed 4–20–15; 8:45 am]
involved in trading the Shares during
Exchange, may obtain trading BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
the Pre-Market and Post-Market
information regarding trading in the
Sessions when an updated Intraday
Shares and other exchange-traded
Indicative Value will not be calculated SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
securities from such markets and other
or publicly disseminated; (e) the COMMISSION
entities. In addition, the Exchange may
requirement that members deliver a
obtain information regarding trading in [Release No. 34–74733; File No. SR–C2–
prospectus to investors purchasing
the Shares and other exchange-traded 2015–007]
newly issued Shares prior to or
securities from markets and other
concurrently with the confirmation of a
entities that are members of ISG or with Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2
transaction; (f) trading information; and
which the Exchange has in place a Options Exchange, Incorporated;
(g) the dissemination of the Disclosed
comprehensive surveillance sharing Notice of Filing and Immediate
Portfolio through the Fund’s Web site.
agreement.23 (5) For initial and/or continued Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
The Commission notes that the Fund listing, the Fund must be in compliance Change To Amend the Fees Schedule
and the Shares must comply with the with Rule 10A–3 24 under the Act. April 15, 2015.
requirements of Nasdaq Rule 5735 to be (6) The Fund may invest up to 30%
listed and traded on the Exchange. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
of its net assets in foreign equity Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Nasdaq deems the Shares to be equity securities of small cap companies traded
securities, thus rendering trading in the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
on a U.S. exchange as ADRs, which may notice is hereby given that on April 10,
Shares subject to Nasdaq’s existing rules include companies in emerging markets.
governing the trading of equity 2015, C2 Options Exchange,
(7) The Fund may hold up to an Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘C2’’)
securities. In support of this proposal, aggregate amount of 15% of its net
the Exchange represented that: filed with the Securities and Exchange
assets in illiquid securities or other Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
(1) The Shares will be subject to illiquid assets (calculated at the time of proposed rule change as described in
Nasdaq Rule 5735, which sets forth the investment). Items I, II, and III below, which Items
initial and continued listing criteria (8) The Fund may not invest more
have been prepared by the Exchange.
applicable to Managed Fund Shares. than 25% of the value of its total assets
The Commission is publishing this
(2) Trading in the Shares will be in securities of issuers in any one
notice to solicit comments on the
subject to the existing trading industry or group of industries. This
proposed rule change from interested
surveillances administered by both restriction does not apply to obligations
persons.
Nasdaq and FINRA on behalf of the issued or guaranteed by the U.S.
Exchange, which are designed to detect government, its agencies or I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
violations of Exchange rules and instrumentalities, or securities of other Statement of the Terms of Substance of
applicable federal securities laws, and registered investment companies. the Proposed Rule Change
these procedures are adequate to (9) Not more than 10% of the net The Exchange proposes to amend its
properly monitor Exchange trading of assets of the Fund, in the aggregate, will Fees Schedule. The text of the proposed
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the Shares in all trading sessions and to be invested in unlisted equity securities rule change is available on the
deter and detect violations of Exchange or equity securities not listed on an
exchange that is a member of the ISG or 25 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
21 Seeid. at 11508. a party to a comprehensive surveillance 26 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
22 See supra note 7. sharing agreement with the Exchange. 27 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
23 For a list of the current members of ISG, see 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
www.isgportal.org. 24 See 17 CFR 240.10A–3. 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:07 Apr 20, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM 21APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_22327/page/1.svg)
![22254 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 76 / Tuesday, April 21, 2015 / Notices
All submissions should refer to File certified that, in her opinion, one or Analyst, 202–205–7030, curtis.rich@
Number SR–C2–2015–007. This file more of the exemptions set forth in 5 sba.gov.
number should be included on the U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
subject line if email is used. To help the and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) All 8(a) participants are required to
Commission process and review your and (10), permit consideration of the provide semiannual information on any
comments more efficiently, please use scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting. agents, representatives, attorneys, and
only one method. The Commission will Commissioner Piwowar, as duty accounts receiving compensation to
post all comments on the Commission’s officer, voted to consider the items assist in obtaining a Federal contract for
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ listed for the Closed Meeting in closed the participant. The information
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the session, and determined that no earlier addresses the amount of compensation
submission, all subsequent notice thereof was possible. received and description of the
amendments, all written statements The subject matter of the Closed activities performed in return for such
with respect to the proposed rule Meeting will be: compensation. The information is used
change that are filed with the Institution and settlement of to ensure that participants do not engage
Commission, and all written injunctive actions; in any improper or illegal activity in
communications relating to the Institution and settlement of connection with obtaining a contract.
proposed rule change between the administrative proceedings; and
Commission and any person, other than Other matters relating to enforcement Solicitation of Public Comments
those that may be withheld from the proceedings. SBA is requesting comments on (a)
public in accordance with the At times, changes in Commission Whether the collection of information is
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be priorities require alterations in the necessary for the agency to properly
available for Web site viewing and scheduling of meeting items. perform its functions; (b) whether the
printing in the Commission’s Public For further information and to burden estimates are accurate; (c)
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., ascertain what, if any, matters have been whether there are ways to minimize the
Washington, DC 20549 on official added, deleted or postponed, please burden, including through the use of
business days between the hours of contact the Office of the Secretary at automated techniques or other forms of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the (202) 551–5400. information technology; and (d) whether
filing also will be available for Dated: April 16, 2015. there are ways to enhance the quality,
inspection and copying at the principal Brent J. Fields, utility, and clarity of the information.
office of the Exchange. All comments Secretary.
received will be posted without change; Summary of Information Collection
[FR Doc. 2015–09320 Filed 4–17–15; 11:15 am]
the Commission does not edit personal Title: Representatives Used and
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
identifying information from Compensation Paid for Services in
submissions. You should submit only Connection with Obtaining Federal
information that you wish to make Contracts.
available publicly. All submissions SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Description of Respondents: 8(a)
should refer to File Number SR–C2– Program Participants.
Data Collection Available for Public Form Number: SBA Form 1790.
2015–007 and should be submitted on Comments
or before May 12, 2015. Total Estimated Annual Responses:
15,628.
For the Commission, by the Division of 60-day notice and request for
ACTION:
Total Estimated Annual Hour Burden:
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated comments. 3,907.
authority.11
Brent J. Fields, SUMMARY: The Small Business Curtis B. Rich,
Secretary.
Administration (SBA) intends to request Management Analyst.
approval, from the Office of [FR Doc. 2015–09205 Filed 4–20–15; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. 2015–09069 Filed 4–20–15; 8:45 am]
Management and Budget (OMB) for the
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
collection of information described
below. The Paperwork Reduction Act
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
COMMISSION requires federal agencies to publish a
notice in the Federal Register [Disaster Declaration #14276 and #14277]
Sunshine Act Meeting concerning each proposed collection of
Rhode Island Disaster #RI–00014
information before submission to OMB,
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to and to allow 60 days for public AGENCY: U.S. Small Business
the provisions of the Government in the comment in response to the notice. This Administration.
Sunshine Act, Public Law 94–409, that notice complies with that requirement. ACTION: Notice.
the Securities and Exchange
DATES: Submit comments on or before
Commission will hold a Closed Meeting SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the
June 22, 2015.
on Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 2 p.m. Presidential declaration of a major
Commissioners, Counsel to the ADDRESSES: Send all comments to
disaster for Public Assistance Only for
Commissioners, the Secretary to the Melinda Edwards, Program Analyst,
the State of Rhode Island (FEMA–4212–
Commission, and recording secretaries Office of Business Development, Small
DR), dated 04/03/2015.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Incident: Severe Winter Storm and
staff members who have an interest in 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20416. Snowstorm.
the matters also may be present. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Incident Period: 01/26/2015 through
The General Counsel of the Melinda Edwards, Program Analyst, 01/28/2015
Commission, or her designee, has Business Development, Effective Date: 04/03/2015.
Melinda.edwards@sba.gov 202–619– Physical Loan Application Deadline
11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 1843, or Curtis B. Rich, Management Date: 06/02/2015.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:07 Apr 20, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM 21APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_22327/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-16 08:33:12
Document Modified: 2015-12-16 08:33:12
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 22251 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR