80_FR_22627 80 FR 22550 - Notice Pursuant To The National Cooperative Research And Production Act Of 1993-Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium, Inc.

80 FR 22550 - Notice Pursuant To The National Cooperative Research And Production Act Of 1993-Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium, Inc.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 77 (April 22, 2015)

Page Range22550-22550
FR Document2015-09322

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 22550]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09322]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant To The National Cooperative Research And 
Production Act Of 1993--Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium, 
Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 25, 2015, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Network Centric Operations 
Industry Consortium, Inc. (``NCOIC'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Harry Raduege (individual member), 
Arlington, VA; Tata Power SED, Andheri, Mumbai, INDIA; and Vikram 
Chauhan (individual member), Great Falls, VA, have been added as 
parties to this venture.
    In addition, NJVC, LLC, Vienna, VA, Saab AB, Ostersund, SWEDEN; and 
The MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA, have withdrawn as parties to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and NCOIC intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 19, 2004, NCOIC filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on February 2, 2005 (70 FR 5486).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 27, 
2015. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on February 27, 2015 (80 FR 10716).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-09322 Filed 4-21-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-11-P



                                                    22550                        Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 77 / Wednesday, April 22, 2015 / Notices

                                                    Trade Secret Nos. 1, 6, 14, and 15. The                 cranes and components thereof that (a)                DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
                                                    ALJ further found no violation of                       infringe one or more of claims 23–26 of
                                                    section 337 with respect to claims 6, 10,               the ’928 patent and are manufactured                  Antitrust Division
                                                    and 11 of the ’928 patent, claim 1 of the               by, or on behalf of, or are imported by
                                                    ’158 patent, and Trade Secret Nos. 3 and                or on behalf of the Respondents or any                Notice Pursuant To The National
                                                    4.                                                      of their affiliated companies, parents,               Cooperative Research And Production
                                                       On July 28, 2014, OUII, Manitowoc,                   subsidiaries, agents, or other related                Act Of 1993—Network Centric
                                                    and Sany each filed a petition for                      business entities, or their successors or             Operations Industry Consortium, Inc.
                                                    review. On August 5, 2014, the parties
                                                                                                            assigns; and/or (b) are manufactured
                                                    replied to the respective petitions for                                                                          Notice is hereby given that, on March
                                                                                                            abroad by or on behalf of, or imported
                                                    review.                                                                                                       25, 2015, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
                                                       On September 19, 2014, the                           by or on behalf of, Respondents or any
                                                                                                                                                                  National Cooperative Research and
                                                    Commission determined to review the                     of their affiliated companies, parents,
                                                                                                                                                                  Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
                                                    final ID and solicited briefing from the                subsidiaries, or other related business
                                                                                                                                                                  et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Network Centric
                                                    parties on questions concerning                         entities, or their successors or assigns,
                                                                                                                                                                  Operations Industry Consortium, Inc.
                                                    violation, remedy, bonding, and the                     using any of Trade Secret Nos. 1, 3, 4,
                                                                                                                                                                  (‘‘NCOIC’’) has filed written
                                                    public interest. 79 Fed. Reg. 57566–68.                 6, 14, and 15, for a period of ten (10)
                                                                                                                                                                  notifications simultaneously with the
                                                    Specifically, the Commission                            years; and (2) a cease and desist order
                                                                                                                                                                  Attorney General and the Federal Trade
                                                    determined to review the ALJ’s findings                 prohibiting the domestic respondent
                                                    with respect to: (1) Importation of the                                                                       Commission disclosing changes in its
                                                                                                            from conducting any of the following
                                                    accused products; (2) infringement of                                                                         membership. The notifications were
                                                                                                            activities in the United States:
                                                    the asserted patents; (3) estoppel; (4) the                                                                   filed for the purpose of extending the
                                                                                                            Importing, selling, marketing,
                                                    technical prong of the domestic industry                                                                      Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
                                                                                                            advertising, distributing, transferring
                                                    requirement; and (5) the asserted trade                                                                       antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
                                                                                                            (except for exportation), and soliciting
                                                    secrets. The parties provided initial                                                                         under specified circumstances.
                                                                                                            United States, agents or distributors for,
                                                    submissions to the Commission’s                                                                               Specifically, Harry Raduege (individual
                                                                                                            certain crawler cranes and components
                                                    questions on October 1, 2014, and                                                                             member), Arlington, VA; Tata Power
                                                                                                            therefore manufactured using any of
                                                    responsive submissions on October 8,                                                                          SED, Andheri, Mumbai, INDIA; and
                                                                                                            Trade Secret Nos. 1, 3, 4, 6, 14, and 15.
                                                    2014.                                                                                                         Vikram Chauhan (individual member),
                                                       On December 3, 2014, the                                The Commission has also determined                 Great Falls, VA, have been added as
                                                    Commission determined to request                        that the public interest factors                      parties to this venture.
                                                    additional briefing. Notice (December 3,                enumerated in section 337(d) and (f) (19
                                                                                                                                                                     In addition, NJVC, LLC, Vienna, VA,
                                                    2014). On December 12, 2014, the                        U.S.C. 1337(d) and (f)) do not preclude
                                                    parties filed initial submissions in                                                                          Saab AB, Ostersund, SWEDEN; and The
                                                                                                            issuance of the limited exclusion order
                                                    response to the Commission’s notice                                                                           MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA, have
                                                                                                            or a cease and desist order. Finally, the
                                                    and filed response submissions on                                                                             withdrawn as parties to this venture.
                                                                                                            Commission has determined that a bond
                                                    December 19, 2014.                                      during the period of presidential review                 No other changes have been made in
                                                       After considering the final ID, written              (19 U.S.C. 1337(j)) shall be in the                   either the membership or planned
                                                    submissions, and the record in this                     amount of 100 percent (100%) of the                   activity of the group research project.
                                                    investigation, the Commission has                       entered value of the imported articles                Membership in this group research
                                                    determined to affirm-in-part and                                                                              project remains open, and NCOIC
                                                                                                            that are subject to the limited exclusion
                                                    reverse-in-part the final ID and to                                                                           intends to file additional written
                                                    terminate the investigation with a                      order or cease and desist order. The
                                                                                                            Commission’s orders and opinion were                  notifications disclosing all changes in
                                                    finding of violation of section 337.
                                                                                                            delivered to the President and to the                 membership.
                                                    Specifically, the Commission: (1) Finds
                                                    the asserted method claims of the ’928                  United States Trade Representative on                    On November 19, 2004, NCOIC filed
                                                    patent are not infringed; (2) finds the                 the day of their issuance.                            its original notification pursuant to
                                                    asserted method claim of the ’158 patent                   The authority for the Commission’s                 Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department
                                                    is not infringed; (3) finds that claims                 determination is contained in section                 of Justice published a notice in the
                                                    23–26 of the ’928 patent are infringed by               337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as                     Federal Register pursuant to Section
                                                    at least one product; (4) takes no                      amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part                 6(b) of the Act on February 2, 2005 (70
                                                    position on the ALJ’s estoppel findings;                210 of the Commission’s Rules of                      FR 5486).
                                                    (5) finds that the domestic industry                    Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part                      The last notification was filed with
                                                    requirement has been met; and (6) finds                 210).                                                 the Department on January 27, 2015. A
                                                    Trade Secret Nos. 1, 3, 4, 6, 14, and 15                                                                      notice was published in the Federal
                                                    are protectable and have been                             By order of the Commission.
                                                                                                              Issued: April 16, 2015.                             Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
                                                    misappropriated. The Commission has
                                                                                                                                                                  Act on February 27, 2015 (80 FR 10716).
                                                    issued its opinion setting forth the                    Lisa R. Barton,
                                                    reasons for its determination.                          Secretary to the Commission.                          Patricia A. Brink,
                                                    Commissioner Kieff concurs in the                       [FR Doc. 2015–09280 Filed 4–21–15; 8:45 am]           Director of Civil Enforcement Antitrust
                                                    outcome and has filed an opinion
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                            BILLING CODE 7020–02–P                                Division.
                                                    concurring in result and dissenting in                                                                        [FR Doc. 2015–09322 Filed 4–21–15; 8:45 am]
                                                    part.
                                                                                                                                                                  BILLING CODE 4410–11–P
                                                       Having found a violation of section
                                                    337 in this investigation, the
                                                    Commission has determined that the
                                                    appropriate form of relief is: (1) A
                                                    limited exclusion order prohibiting the
                                                    unlicensed entry of certain crawler


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:00 Apr 21, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00078   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 9990   E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM   22APN1



Document Created: 2015-12-16 08:27:58
Document Modified: 2015-12-16 08:27:58
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation80 FR 22550 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR