80 FR 23249 - Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Bluefish Fishery; 2015 Atlantic Bluefish Specifications
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 80 (April 27, 2015)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 80 (April 27, 2015)
| Page Range | 23249-23252 | |
| FR Document | 2015-09684 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 80 (Monday, April 27, 2015)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 23249-23252] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-09684] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 648 [Docket No. 150126074-5074-01] RIN 0648-XD742 Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Bluefish Fishery; 2015 Atlantic Bluefish Specifications AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Proposed specifications; request for comments. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: NMFS proposes specifications for the 2015 Atlantic bluefish fishery, including catch restrictions for commercial and recreational fisheries. This action is necessary to establish effective catch constraints for the fishing year consistent with regulatory and statutory requirements. The intent of this action is to establish the allowable 2015 harvest levels and other management measures to achieve the target fishing mortality rate, consistent with the Atlantic Bluefish Fishery Management Plan. DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 12, 2015. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2015-0048, by any one of the following methods:Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking portal. Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2015-0048, click the ``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments. Mail: Submit written comments to John Bullard, Regional Administrator, NMFS, Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office, 55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period, may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender will be publically accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous). Copies of the specifications document, including the Environmental Assessment and Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (EA/IRFA) and other supporting documents for the specifications, are available from Dr. Christopher M. Moore, Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, Suite 201, 800 N. State Street, Dover, DE 19901. The specifications document is also accessible via the Internet at: http://www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reid Lichwell, Fishery Management Specialist, (978) 281-9112. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Atlantic bluefish fishery is jointly managed by the Mid- Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) and the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (Commission). The management unit for bluefish specified in the Atlantic Bluefish Fishery Management Plan (FMP) is U.S. waters of the western Atlantic Ocean. Regulations implementing the FMP appear at 50 CFR part 648, subparts A and J. The regulations requiring annual specifications are found at Sec. 648.162. The annual specifications process requires that the Council's Bluefish Monitoring Committee and its Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) review the best available scientific information and make specification recommendations to the Council. These groups have reviewed the 2014 updated bluefish stock assessment, which is summarized in the Environmental Assessment and supporting documents. Based on the recommendations of the Monitoring Committee and SSC, the Council makes its specification recommendations to the NMFS Greater Atlantic Regional Administrator. Because this FMP is a joint plan, the Commission also meets during the annual specification process to adopt complementary measures. The Council's recommendations must include supporting documentation concerning the environmental, economic, and social impacts of the recommendations. NMFS is responsible for reviewing these recommendations to ensure that they achieve the FMP objectives and are consistent with applicable law. NMFS then conducts rulemaking through the Federal Register to propose measures, solicit public comment and publish final measures. [[Page 23250]] Proposed Specifications Updated Model Estimates Overfishing for bluefish is defined as fishing mortality that exceeds the fishing mortality rate that allows maximum sustainable yield (F MSY ), or when the maximum F threshold is exceeded. The stock is considered overfished if the biomass (B) falls below the minimum biomass threshold, defined as \1/2\ BMSY . Amendment 1 to the FMP established that the long-term target F is 90 percent of FMSY (FMSY = 0.19; therefore Ftarget = 90 percent of FMSY , or 0.17), and the long-term target biomass is BMSY = 324 million lb (147,052 mt). The stock assessment model was updated in July 2014 in order to estimate the current status of the bluefish stock (i.e., 2013 biomass and F estimates). This update was used by the Monitoring Committee and the SSC to recommend 2015 specifications. The results of the assessment update were as follows: (1) An estimated stock biomass for 2013, B2013 = 273 million lb (123,716 mt); and (2) an estimated fishing mortality rate for 2013, F2013 = 0.118. Based on the updated 2013 estimate of bluefish stock biomass, the bluefish stock is not considered overfished: B2013 is less than BMSY , but well above the minimum biomass threshold of 162 million lb (73,526 mt). The updated model results also conclude that the Atlantic bluefish stock is not experiencing overfishing; i.e., the most recent F (F2013 = 0.118) is less than the maximum F overfishing threshold (FMSY = 0.19). Bluefish was declared rebuilt in 2009. Proposed 2015 Catch Limits Based upon the results of the assessment update and the Council's risk policy, the SSC recommended an acceptable biological catch (ABC) of 21.544 million lb (9,772 mt) for 2015. The Council recommended no deductions to account for management uncertainty; therefore, ABC=ACL=ACT. The ACT is initially allocated between the recreational fishery (83 percent) and the commercial fishery (17 percent). After deducting an estimate of recreational discards (commercial discards are considered negligible), the recreational harvest limit (RHL) would be 13.073 million lb (5,930 mt) and the commercial quota would be 5.119 million lb (2,322 mt). The FMP specifies that if 17 percent of the TAL is less than 10.500 million lb (4,763 mt), and the recreational fishery is not projected to land its harvest limit for the upcoming year, the commercial fishery may be allocated up to 10.500 million lb (4,763 mt) as its quota, provided that the combination of the projected recreational landings and the commercial quota does not exceed the TAL. Under such a scenario, the RHL would then be adjusted so that the TAL remains unchanged. The Council projected an estimated 2015 annual recreational harvest of 13.073 million lb (5,930 mt). As such, it is expected that a transfer of up to 1.460 million lb (662 mt) from the recreational sector to the commercial sector could be approved. This option represents the preferred alternative recommended by the Council. We intend to evaluate final Marine Recreational Information Program data regarding the 2014 recreational harvest as they become available. The 2015 transfer amount may be changed for the final rule depending on our analysis of the final 2014 recreational landings data. If such a change occurs, we will provide additional data and explanation in the final rule. The Council is not recommending allocating research set-aside quota for 2015; therefore, no additional adjustments to commercial or recreational allocations are needed. The final proposed commercial quota for 2015 is 5.119 million lb (2,322 mt), which would be a 31- percent decrease from 2014 (7.458 million lb, 3,383 mt), and the proposed RHL is 13.073 million lb (5,930 mt), which would be a 3- percent decrease from the 2014 RHL (13.52 million lb, 6,133 mt). Proposed Recreational Possession Limit NMFS proposes not to change the current recreational possession limit, consistent with the recommendation by the Council. This would maintain a daily recreational possession limit of up to 15 fish per person for 2015. Proposed State Commercial Allocations The proposed state commercial allocations for the recommended 2015 commercial quota are shown in Table 1, based on the percentages specified in the FMP. There were no states that exceeded their quota in 2014; therefore, no accountability measures are expected to be implemented for the 2015 fishing year. Table 1--Proposed Bluefish Commercial State-by-State Allocations for 2015 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2015 Proposed 2015 Proposed State Percent share commercial commercial quota (lb) quota (kg) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ME........................................................... 0.6685 34,221 15,522 NH........................................................... 0.4145 21,218 9,624 MA........................................................... 6.7167 343,828 155,958 RI........................................................... 6.8081 348,507 158,080 CT........................................................... 1.2663 64,822 29,402 NY........................................................... 10.3851 531,613 241,136 NJ........................................................... 14.8162 758,441 344,023 DE........................................................... 1.8782 96,145 43,611 MD........................................................... 3.0018 153,662 69,700 VA........................................................... 11.8795 608,112 275,835 NC........................................................... 32.0608 1,641,192 744,432 SC........................................................... 0.0352 1,802 817 GA........................................................... 0.0095 486 220 FL........................................................... 10.0597 514,956 233,580 -------------------------------------------------- Total.................................................... 100.0001 5,119,134 2,322,000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 23251]] Classification Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is consistent with the Atlantic Bluefish FMP, other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law, subject to further consideration after public comment. These proposed specifications are exempt from review under Executive Order 12866. An IRFA was prepared, as required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), which describes the economic impact this proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. The IRFA is summarized here. Description of the Reasons Why Action by the Agency Is Being Considered A description of the action and why it is being considered are contained at the beginning of this preamble and in the SUMMARY. Statement of the Objective of, and Legal Basis for, This Proposed Rule The statement of the objective and the legal basis for this action are contained at the beginning of this preamble and in the SUMMARY. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which This Proposed Rule Would Apply The Small Business Administration (SBA) defines a small business in the commercial harvesting sector as a firm with receipts (gross revenues) of up to $5.5 million for shellfish and $20.5 million for finfish businesses. A small business in the recreational fishery is a firm with receipts of up to $7.5 million. According to the 2011-2013 Northeast affiliate ownership database, 1,009 fishing businesses or affiliated firms (vessels grouped together by a common owner) landed bluefish during the 2011-2013 period, with 1,001 of those businesses categorized as small business and 8 categorized as large business. However, the affiliate database used to identify small/large business firms that have recently participated in the bluefish fishery does not contain detailed ownership data for business entities in the South Atlantic Region. As such, the South Atlantic Trip Ticket reports were used to identify vessels participating in the bluefish fishery within the region. The South Atlantic Trip Ticket reports identified 790 vessels that landed bluefish in North Carolina and 1,338 vessels that landed bluefish on Florida's east coast in 2013.\1\ Bluefish landings in South Carolina and Georgia were near zero in 2013, representing a negligible proportion of the total bluefish landings along the Atlantic Coast. Therefore, this analysis assumed that no vessel activity for these two states took place in 2013. In recent years, approximately 2,000 party/ charter vessels have been active in the bluefish fishery and/or have caught bluefish. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Some of these vessels were also identified in the Northeast dealer data; therefore, double counting is possible. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Description of the Projected Reporting, Record-Keeping, and Other Compliance Requirements of This Proposed Rule There is no new reporting or recordkeeping requirements contained in any of the alternatives considered for this action. Federal Rule Which May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With This Proposed Rule NMFS is not aware of any relevant Federal rules that may duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule. Description of Significant Alternatives to the Proposed Action Which Accomplish the Stated Objectives of Applicable Statues and Which Minimize Any Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities The small entities that could be affected by this action include any business entity holding an active Federal permit for Atlantic bluefish, as well as owners of vessels that fish for Atlantic bluefish in state waters. There were 1,009 Northeast fishing businesses that landed bluefish from 2011-2013, 1,001 are considered small business entities; there would be no disproportionate impacts between large and small entities as a result of the proposed rule. There are 765 vessels in North Carolina that landed bluefish quota from 2011-2013; on average those vessels generated 10.8% of their ex-vessel revenue from bluefish landings. There are 1,227 vessels in on the east coast of Florida that landed bluefish quota from 2011-2013; on average those vessels generated 0.83% of their ex-vessel revenue from bluefish landings. The IRFA in the Draft EA for this action addressed two alternatives (including a no action/status quo alternative) for the 2015 Atlantic bluefish fishing year. Both quota alternatives considered in this analysis are based on various commercial harvest levels for bluefish. For analysis of impacts of the No Action Alternative, the current commercial quota of 7.458 million lb (3,383 mt) and RHL of 13.523 million lb (6,134 mt) for 2014 would be maintained. For analysis of impacts of the Preferred Action Alternative, the transfer of 1.457 million lb (661 mt) from the recreational sector to the commercial sector was used. The calculated TAL, commercial quota and the RHL for the Preferred Alternative (Council's preferred) and the No Action Alternative are shown in Table 2. Table 2--Proposed 2015 Atlantic Bluefish Specification Alternatives for TAL, Commercial Quota, and RHL -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TAL Commercial quota RHL Year Alternatives ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- million lb mt million lb mt million lb mt -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2015.............................. Preferred Action.... 18.192 8,252 5.119 2,322 13.073 5,930 2015.............................. No Action........... 21.081 9,888 7.458 3,383 13.523 6,134 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commercial Fishery Impacts To assess the impact of the alternatives on commercial fisheries, the Council conducted a threshold analysis and analysis of potential changes in ex-vessel gross revenue that would result from each alternative, using Northeast dealer reports and South Atlantic Trip Ticket reports. Under the No Action Alternative, the 2015 specifications would have no aggregate change in allowable [[Page 23252]] commercial landings or RHL relative to the 2014 limits. As such, it is expected that no change in revenues or fishing opportunities would occur. The No Action Alternative would likely result in quota constraints for vessels in New York and Massachusetts; however, these quota constraints would not have an economic impact due to the ability to transfer quota from state to state. Under the Preferred Alternative, 57 business entities were projected to incur revenue losses of 5 percent or more, 944 entities were projected to incur losses of less than 5 percent in 2015. Under Alternative 2 (non-preferred), 87 business entities were projected to incur revenue losses of 5 percent or more, 914 entities were projected to incur losses of less than 5 percent in 2015. For both alternatives, the majority of vessels with greater than 5 percent of revenue losses had total gross sales of $10,000 or less (average for all possible species combined not just bluefish in 2011-2013), which may indicate that the dependence on fishing for some of these vessels is small. The South Atlantic Trip Ticket Report data indicated that 765 vessels landed commercial bluefish quota in North Carolina from 2011- 2013. On average, these vessels generated 10.8% of their total ex- vessel revenue from bluefish landings. The commercial landings are projected to decrease as a consequence of the 2015 allocation when compared to the 2014 allocation by approximately 31.4% under the Preferred Alternative and 50.9% under Alternative 2. On average, reduction in revenues due to the potential decrease in landings associated with the 2015 quota compared to the 2014 quota are expected to be approximately 3.4% for the Preferred Alternative and 5.5% for Alternative 2, for fishermen that land bluefish in North Carolina. In Florida, 1,227 vessels landed bluefish from 2011-2013, and 0.83% of their total ex-vessel revenue was generated from bluefish landings. On average, reduction in revenues due to the potential decrease in landings associated with the 2015 quota compared to the 2014 quota are expected to be approximately 0.3% for the Preferred Alternative and 0.4% for Alternative 2, for fishermen that land bluefish in Florida. If commercial quota is transferred from a state or states that do not land their entire bluefish quota for 2015, as was done in frequently in previous years, the number of affected entities could change. Transfers could lessen the adverse economic impact on vessels landing in the state(s) receiving quota transfers for both alternatives. Such transfers cannot be predicted or projected, as each occurs on a case by case agreement between states. Recreational Fishery Impacts It is very difficult to calculate the economic value of recreational fisheries. However, the Preferred Action Alternative RHL (13.073 million lb, 5,930 mt) is approximately 15 percent below the recreational landings for 2013 (15.388 million lb, 6,980 mt). Under the No Action Alternative, the recommended RHL for the recreational sector (13.523 million lb, 6,134 mt) is approximately 13 percent below the recreational landings for 2013 (15.388 million lb, 6,980 mt), and the RHL for Alternative 2 (14.530 million lb, 6, 591 mt) is approximately 5.5 percent below the recreational landings for 2013. While the proposed recreational harvest limit under the Preferred Alternative for 2015 is lower than the limit implemented in 2014 (13.523 million lb) and 2013 recreational landings (15.388 million lb), the projected landings for 2015 are expected to be similar to the proposed limit under this alternative. Therefore, it is anticipated that the proposed RHL will not limit recreational catch or negatively impact recreational fishing revenue. It is not anticipated that this management measure will have any negative effects on recreational fishermen or affect the demand for party/charter boat trips. This alternative is not expected to significantly affect angler satisfaction nor expected to result in landings in excess of the recreational harvest limit. Overall, it is not expected that the final recreational management measures will significantly affect gross revenues of businesses providing goods and services to anglers participating in the party/charter boat, private/rental boat, and shore fisheries for bluefish. Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Dated: April 17, 2015. Eileen Sobeck, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2015-09684 Filed 4-24-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 80 / Monday, April 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules 23249
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
summary of the Bureau’s public notice, remain anonymous).
WC Docket No. 05–25, RM–10593, DA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Copies of the specifications
15–382, released March 27, 2015. This Administration document, including the Environmental
document does not contain information Assessment and Initial Regulatory
collection(s) subject to the Paperwork 50 CFR Part 648 Flexibility Analysis (EA/IRFA) and
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public other supporting documents for the
[Docket No. 150126074–5074–01]
Law 104–13. In addition, therefore, it specifications, are available from Dr.
does not contain any new or modified RIN 0648–XD742 Christopher M. Moore, Executive
‘‘information collection burden[s] for Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery
small business concerns with fewer than Fisheries of the Northeastern United Management Council, Suite 201, 800 N.
25 employees,’’ pursuant to the Small States; Atlantic Bluefish Fishery; 2015 State Street, Dover, DE 19901. The
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002. Atlantic Bluefish Specifications specifications document is also
The complete text of this document is accessible via the Internet at: http://
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov.
available for public inspection and Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
copying from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. ET Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reid
Monday through Thursday or from 8:00 Commerce. Lichwell, Fishery Management
a.m. to 11:30 a.m. ET on Fridays in the ACTION: Proposed specifications; request
Specialist, (978) 281–9112.
FCC Reference Information Center, 445 for comments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
12th Street SW., Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554. The complete SUMMARY: NMFS proposes specifications Background
text is also available on the for the 2015 Atlantic bluefish fishery, The Atlantic bluefish fishery is jointly
Commission’s Web site at http:// including catch restrictions for managed by the Mid-Atlantic Fishery
wireless.fcc.gov, or by using the search commercial and recreational fisheries. Management Council (Council) and the
function on the ECFS Web page at This action is necessary to establish Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. effective catch constraints for the fishing Commission (Commission). The
year consistent with regulatory and management unit for bluefish specified
SUMMARY: On March 27, 2015, the statutory requirements. The intent of in the Atlantic Bluefish Fishery
Commission released a public notice this action is to establish the allowable Management Plan (FMP) is U.S. waters
extending the deadlines for filing 2015 harvest levels and other of the western Atlantic Ocean.
comments and reply comments in management measures to achieve the Regulations implementing the FMP
response to Section IV.B of the Special target fishing mortality rate, consistent appear at 50 CFR part 648, subparts A
Access FNPRM in the Commission’s with the Atlantic Bluefish Fishery and J. The regulations requiring annual
special access rulemaking proceeding Management Plan. specifications are found at § 648.162.
until July 1, 2015 and July 22, 2015, DATES: Comments must be received on The annual specifications process
respectively. On December 11, 2012, the or before May 12, 2015. requires that the Council’s Bluefish
Commission adopted an order requiring ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, Monitoring Committee and its Scientific
providers and purchasers of special identified by NOAA–NMFS–2015–0048, and Statistical Committee (SSC) review
access and certain entities providing by any one of the following methods: the best available scientific information
‘‘best efforts’’ service to submit data and • Electronic Submissions: Submit all and make specification
information for a comprehensive electronic public comments via the recommendations to the Council. These
evaluation of the special access market Federal e-Rulemaking portal. Go to groups have reviewed the 2014 updated
and, in Section IV.B of the www.regulations.gov/ bluefish stock assessment, which is
accompanying Special Access FNPRM, #!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2015- summarized in the Environmental
sought comment on changes to its rules 0048, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, Assessment and supporting documents.
for special access services provided by complete the required fields, and enter Based on the recommendations of the
incumbent local exchange carriers in or attach your comments. Monitoring Committee and SSC, the
price cap areas. The process for • Mail: Submit written comments to Council makes its specification
facilitating public access to the data John Bullard, Regional Administrator, recommendations to the NMFS Greater
consistent with the protective order NMFS, Greater Atlantic Regional Atlantic Regional Administrator.
released on October 1, 2014 is ongoing Fisheries Office, 55 Great Republic Because this FMP is a joint plan, the
but the data is not yet available, and Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Commission also meets during the
there is insufficient time for the public Instructions: Comments sent by any annual specification process to adopt
other method, to any other address or complementary measures.
to access and review this information
before filing comment and reply individual, or received after the end of The Council’s recommendations must
the comment period, may not be include supporting documentation
comments. The Bureau therefore
considered by NMFS. All comments concerning the environmental,
extends the deadline for filing
received are a part of the public record economic, and social impacts of the
comments until July 1, 2015 and reply
and will generally be posted for public recommendations. NMFS is responsible
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
comments until July 22, 2015. viewing on www.regulations.gov for reviewing these recommendations to
Federal Communications Commission. without change. All personal identifying ensure that they achieve the FMP
Pamela Arluk, information (e.g., name, address, etc.), objectives and are consistent with
Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline confidential business information, or applicable law. NMFS then conducts
Competition Bureau. otherwise sensitive information rulemaking through the Federal
[FR Doc. 2015–09772 Filed 4–24–15; 8:45 am] submitted voluntarily by the sender will Register to propose measures, solicit
be publically accessible. NMFS will public comment and publish final
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/ measures.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:40 Apr 24, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM 27APP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_23329/page/1.svg)
![23252 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 80 / Monday, April 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules
commercial landings or RHL relative to associated with the 2015 quota approximately 13 percent below the
the 2014 limits. As such, it is expected compared to the 2014 quota are recreational landings for 2013 (15.388
that no change in revenues or fishing expected to be approximately 3.4% for million lb, 6,980 mt), and the RHL for
opportunities would occur. The No the Preferred Alternative and 5.5% for Alternative 2 (14.530 million lb, 6, 591
Action Alternative would likely result Alternative 2, for fishermen that land mt) is approximately 5.5 percent below
in quota constraints for vessels in New bluefish in North Carolina. the recreational landings for 2013.
York and Massachusetts; however, these In Florida, 1,227 vessels landed While the proposed recreational
quota constraints would not have an bluefish from 2011–2013, and 0.83% of harvest limit under the Preferred
economic impact due to the ability to their total ex-vessel revenue was Alternative for 2015 is lower than the
transfer quota from state to state. generated from bluefish landings. On limit implemented in 2014 (13.523
Under the Preferred Alternative, 57 average, reduction in revenues due to million lb) and 2013 recreational
business entities were projected to incur the potential decrease in landings landings (15.388 million lb), the
revenue losses of 5 percent or more, 944 associated with the 2015 quota projected landings for 2015 are expected
entities were projected to incur losses of compared to the 2014 quota are to be similar to the proposed limit under
less than 5 percent in 2015. Under expected to be approximately 0.3% for this alternative. Therefore, it is
Alternative 2 (non-preferred), 87 the Preferred Alternative and 0.4% for
business entities were projected to incur anticipated that the proposed RHL will
Alternative 2, for fishermen that land not limit recreational catch or negatively
revenue losses of 5 percent or more, 914 bluefish in Florida.
entities were projected to incur losses of impact recreational fishing revenue. It is
If commercial quota is transferred
less than 5 percent in 2015. For both not anticipated that this management
from a state or states that do not land
alternatives, the majority of vessels with measure will have any negative effects
their entire bluefish quota for 2015, as
greater than 5 percent of revenue losses on recreational fishermen or affect the
was done in frequently in previous
had total gross sales of $10,000 or less demand for party/charter boat trips.
years, the number of affected entities
(average for all possible species This alternative is not expected to
could change. Transfers could lessen the
combined not just bluefish in 2011– significantly affect angler satisfaction
adverse economic impact on vessels
2013), which may indicate that the nor expected to result in landings in
landing in the state(s) receiving quota
dependence on fishing for some of these excess of the recreational harvest limit.
transfers for both alternatives. Such
vessels is small. Overall, it is not expected that the final
transfers cannot be predicted or
The South Atlantic Trip Ticket Report recreational management measures will
projected, as each occurs on a case by
data indicated that 765 vessels landed significantly affect gross revenues of
case agreement between states.
commercial bluefish quota in North businesses providing goods and services
Carolina from 2011–2013. On average, Recreational Fishery Impacts to anglers participating in the party/
these vessels generated 10.8% of their It is very difficult to calculate the charter boat, private/rental boat, and
total ex-vessel revenue from bluefish economic value of recreational fisheries. shore fisheries for bluefish.
landings. The commercial landings are However, the Preferred Action Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
projected to decrease as a consequence Alternative RHL (13.073 million lb,
Dated: April 17, 2015.
of the 2015 allocation when compared 5,930 mt) is approximately 15 percent
to the 2014 allocation by approximately below the recreational landings for 2013 Eileen Sobeck,
31.4% under the Preferred Alternative (15.388 million lb, 6,980 mt). Under the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
and 50.9% under Alternative 2. On No Action Alternative, the National Marine Fisheries Service.
average, reduction in revenues due to recommended RHL for the recreational [FR Doc. 2015–09684 Filed 4–24–15; 8:45 am]
the potential decrease in landings sector (13.523 million lb, 6,134 mt) is BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:40 Apr 24, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM 27APP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_23329/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-16 08:29:27
Document Modified: 2015-12-16 08:29:27
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed specifications; request for comments. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before May 12, 2015. | |
| Contact | Reid Lichwell, Fishery Management Specialist, (978) 281-9112. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 23249 | |
| RIN Number | 0648-XD74 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR