80_FR_25015 80 FR 24931 - Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review

80 FR 24931 - Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 84 (May 1, 2015)

Page Range24931-24932
FR Document2015-10183

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 84 (Friday, May 1, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 84 (Friday, May 1, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24931-24932]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10183]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[30Day-15-15IG]


Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has submitted 
the following information collection request to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The notice for the proposed 
information collection is published to obtain comments from the public 
and affected agencies.
    Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected 
agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are 
encouraged. Your comments should address any of the following: (a) 
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary 
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including 
whether the information will have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the 
accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed 
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology 
and assumptions used; (c) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of 
the information to be collected; (d) Minimize the burden of the 
collection of information on those who are to respond, including 
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or 
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses; and 
(e) Assess information collection costs.
    To request additional information on the proposed project or to 
obtain a copy of the information collection plan and instruments, call 
(404) 639-7570 or send an email to [email protected]. Written comments and/or 
suggestions regarding the items contained in this notice should be 
directed to the Attention: CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management and 
Budget, Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395-5806. Written 
comments should be received within 30 days of this notice.

Proposed Project

    Public Health Associate Program (PHAP) Alumni Assessment--New--
Office for State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial Support (OSTLTS)--
(proposed), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Background and Brief Description

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) works to 
protect America from health, safety and security threats, both foreign 
and in the U.S. CDC strives to fulfill this mission, in part, through a 
competent and capable public health workforce. One mechanism to 
developing the public health workforce is through training programs 
like the Public Health Associate Program (PHAP).
    The mission of PHAP is to train and provide experiential learning 
to early career professionals who contribute to the public health 
workforce. PHAP targets recent graduates with bachelors or masters 
degrees who are beginning a career in public health. Each year, a new 
cohort of up to 200 associates is enrolled in the program. Associates 
are CDC employees who complete two-year assignments in a host site 
(i.e., a state, tribal, local, or territorial health department or non-
profit organization). Host sites design their associates' assignments 
to meet their agency's unique needs while also providing on-the-job 
experience that prepares associates for future careers in public 
health. Associates also receive CDC-based training in core public 
health concepts and topics to provide the knowledge, skills, and 
abilities necessary to succeed in their assignments and provide a 
foundation for a career in public health. PHAP hosts an initial in-
person orientation and annual public health training at CDC and offers 
long-distance learning opportunities throughout the program. It is the 
goal of PHAP that following participation in the two-year program, 
alumni will seek employment within the public health system (i.e., 
federal,

[[Page 24932]]

state, tribal, local, or territorial health agencies, or non-
governmental organizations), focusing on public health or health/
healthcare.
    When PHAP originated in 2007, the program focused on increasing 
recruitment and enrollment; to date, there has been limited systematic 
assessment of the program. As a result, one current program priority is 
focused on documenting program outcomes to inform refinements to 
program processes and activities, demonstrate program impact, and 
inform decision making about future program direction. The purpose of 
this information collection request (ICR) is to gain approval to follow 
alumni career progression following participation in PHAP. The ICR will 
enable the program to demonstrate evidence of program outcomes, 
specifically to document how many alumni are retained as members of the 
public health workforce, where alumni are employed, what topical and 
functional public health areas alumni support (e.g., chronic disease, 
infectious disease, assessment, communications, etc.), to what extent 
alumni support the capabilities of public health agencies at the 
federal, state, territorial, local, tribal, and non-governmental 
organizational levels, and to what extent PHAP has influenced alumni 
career paths (if at all). Information will be used to answer key 
program assessment questions, specifically: ``Is PHAP a quality 
program?'', ``Is PHAP an effective program?'', and ``What is the impact 
of PHAP?''
    CDC will administer the PHAP Alumni Assessment at two different 
time points (1 year post-graduation, and 3 years post-graduation) to 
PHAP alumni. Assessment questions will remain consistent at each 
administration (i.e., 1 year, or 3 years post-PHAP graduation). The 
language, however, will be updated for each assessment administration 
to reflect the appropriate time period. It is estimated that there will 
be no more than 480 respondents (160 respondents annually) over the 
course of the three year approval period. Assessments will be 
administered electronically; each alumnus will receive an embedded link 
in an email invitation that is unique to that alumnus; each alumnus 
will only have access to his/her link to the assessment Web site. The 
total estimated burden is 8 minutes per respondent per assessment. The 
total annualized estimated burden is 21 hours.
    There are no costs to respondents except their time.

                                        Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                   Number of     Average  burden
         Type of respondent                  Form name            Number of      responses per    per  response
                                                                 respondents       respondent       (in hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHAP Alumni.........................  PHAP Alumni Assessment.             160                1             8/60
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific 
Integrity, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the 
Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2015-10183 Filed 4-30-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P



                                                                                    Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Notices                                            24931

                                                     4. Demonstrate how scientifically                    effect, a point of departure (POD), or the            responses; and (e) Assess information
                                                  credible IDLH values can be derived                     point on the dose–response curve from                 collection costs.
                                                  from available data resources                           which dose extrapolation is initiated                   To request additional information on
                                                     The IDLH methodology outlined in                     and for applying default uncertainty                  the proposed project or to obtain a copy
                                                  this CIB reflects the modern principles                 factors (UFs) to derive the IDLH value.               of the information collection plan and
                                                  and understanding in the fields of risk                 Conceptually, the derivation process for              instruments, call (404) 639–7570 or
                                                  assessment, toxicology, and                             IDLH values is similar to that used in                send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Written
                                                  occupational health and provides the                    other risk assessment applications,                   comments and/or suggestions regarding
                                                  scientific rationale for the derivation of              including these steps:                                the items contained in this notice
                                                  IDLH values based on contemporary risk                     1. Hazard characterization.                        should be directed to the Attention:
                                                  assessment practices. According to this                    2. Identification of critical adverse              CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management
                                                  protocol, IDLH values are based on                      effects.                                              and Budget, Washington, DC 20503 or
                                                  health effects considerations determined                   3. Identification of a POD.                        by fax to (202) 395–5806. Written
                                                  through a critical assessment of the                       4. Application of appropriate UFs,                 comments should be received within 30
                                                  toxicology and human health effects                     based on the study and POD.                           days of this notice.
                                                  data. This approach ensures that the                      Dated: April 24, 2015.
                                                                                                                                                                Proposed Project
                                                  IDLH values reflect an airborne                         John Howard,
                                                  concentration of a substance that                       Director, National Institute for Occupational
                                                                                                                                                                  Public Health Associate Program
                                                  represents a high-risk situation that may               Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control        (PHAP) Alumni Assessment—New—
                                                  endanger workers’ lives or health.                      and Prevention.                                       Office for State, Tribal, Local, and
                                                  Relevant airborne concentrations are                    [FR Doc. 2015–10295 Filed 4–30–15; 8:45 am]           Territorial Support (OSTLTS)—
                                                  typically addressed through the                         BILLING CODE 4163–19–P
                                                                                                                                                                (proposed), Centers for Disease Control
                                                  characterization of inhalation                                                                                and Prevention (CDC).
                                                  exposures; however, airborne chemicals                                                                        Background and Brief Description
                                                  can also contribute to toxicity through                 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
                                                  other exposure routes, such as the skin                 HUMAN SERVICES                                           The Centers for Disease Control and
                                                  and eyes. In this document, airborne                                                                          Prevention (CDC) works to protect
                                                  concentrations are referred to as acute                 Centers for Disease Control and                       America from health, safety and security
                                                  inhalation limits or guidelines to adhere               Prevention                                            threats, both foreign and in the U.S.
                                                  to commonly used nomenclature.                                                                                CDC strives to fulfill this mission, in
                                                                                                          [30Day–15–15IG]                                       part, through a competent and capable
                                                     The emphasis on health effects is
                                                  consistent with both the traditional use                                                                      public health workforce. One
                                                                                                          Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
                                                  of IDLH values as a component of the                                                                          mechanism to developing the public
                                                                                                          Reduction Act Review
                                                  respirator selection logic and the                                                                            health workforce is through training
                                                  growing applications of IDLH values in                     The Centers for Disease Control and                programs like the Public Health
                                                  Risk Management Plan (RMPs) for non-                    Prevention (CDC) has submitted the                    Associate Program (PHAP).
                                                  routine work practices governing                        following information collection request                 The mission of PHAP is to train and
                                                  operations in high-risk environments                    to the Office of Management and Budget                provide experiential learning to early
                                                  (e.g., confined spaces) and the                         (OMB) for review and approval in                      career professionals who contribute to
                                                  development of Emergency                                accordance with the Paperwork                         the public health workforce. PHAP
                                                  Preparedness Plans (EPPs). Incorporated                 Reduction Act of 1995. The notice for                 targets recent graduates with bachelors
                                                  in the IDLH methodology are the                         the proposed information collection is                or masters degrees who are beginning a
                                                  standing guidelines and procedures                      published to obtain comments from the                 career in public health. Each year, a new
                                                  used for the development of                             public and affected agencies.                         cohort of up to 200 associates is
                                                  community-based acute exposure limits                      Written comments and suggestions                   enrolled in the program. Associates are
                                                  called Acute Exposure Guideline Levels                  from the public and affected agencies                 CDC employees who complete two-year
                                                  (AEGLs). The inclusion of the AEGL                      concerning the proposed collection of                 assignments in a host site (i.e., a state,
                                                  methodology has helped ensure that the                  information are encouraged. Your                      tribal, local, or territorial health
                                                  health-based IDLH values derived with                   comments should address any of the                    department or non-profit organization).
                                                  use of the guidance provided in this                    following: (a) Evaluate whether the                   Host sites design their associates’
                                                  document are based on validated                         proposed collection of information is                 assignments to meet their agency’s
                                                  scientific rationale.                                   necessary for the proper performance of               unique needs while also providing on-
                                                     The IDLH methodology is based on a                   the functions of the agency, including                the-job experience that prepares
                                                  weight-of-evidence approach that                        whether the information will have                     associates for future careers in public
                                                  applies scientific judgment for critical                practical utility; (b) Evaluate the                   health. Associates also receive CDC-
                                                  evaluation of the quality and                           accuracy of the agencies estimate of the              based training in core public health
                                                  consistency of scientific data and in                   burden of the proposed collection of                  concepts and topics to provide the
                                                  extrapolation from the available data to                information, including the validity of                knowledge, skills, and abilities
                                                  the IDLH value. The weight-of-evidence                  the methodology and assumptions used;                 necessary to succeed in their
                                                  approach refers to critical examination                 (c) Enhance the quality, utility, and                 assignments and provide a foundation
                                                  of all available data from diverse lines                clarity of the information to be                      for a career in public health. PHAP
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  of evidence and the derivation of a                     collected; (d) Minimize the burden of                 hosts an initial in-person orientation
                                                  scientific interpretation on the basis of               the collection of information on those                and annual public health training at
                                                  the collective body of data, including its              who are to respond, including through                 CDC and offers long-distance learning
                                                  relevance, quality, and reported results.               the use of appropriate automated,                     opportunities throughout the program. It
                                                  This is in contrast to a purely                         electronic, mechanical, or other                      is the goal of PHAP that following
                                                  hierarchical or strength-of-evidence                    technological collection techniques or                participation in the two-year program,
                                                  approach, which relies on rigid decision                other forms of information technology,                alumni will seek employment within
                                                  criteria for selecting a critical adverse               e.g., permitting electronic submission of             the public health system (i.e., federal,


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:14 Apr 30, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00040   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM   01MYN1


                                                  24932                                    Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Notices

                                                  state, tribal, local, or territorial health                       the public health workforce, where                     administration (i.e., 1 year, or 3 years
                                                  agencies, or non-governmental                                     alumni are employed, what topical and                  post-PHAP graduation). The language,
                                                  organizations), focusing on public                                functional public health areas alumni                  however, will be updated for each
                                                  health or health/healthcare.                                      support (e.g., chronic disease, infectious             assessment administration to reflect the
                                                    When PHAP originated in 2007, the                               disease, assessment, communications,                   appropriate time period. It is estimated
                                                  program focused on increasing                                     etc.), to what extent alumni support the               that there will be no more than 480
                                                  recruitment and enrollment; to date,                              capabilities of public health agencies at              respondents (160 respondents annually)
                                                  there has been limited systematic                                 the federal, state, territorial, local, tribal,        over the course of the three year
                                                  assessment of the program. As a result,                           and non-governmental organizational                    approval period. Assessments will be
                                                  one current program priority is focused                           levels, and to what extent PHAP has
                                                                                                                                                                           administered electronically; each
                                                  on documenting program outcomes to                                influenced alumni career paths (if at
                                                  inform refinements to program                                                                                            alumnus will receive an embedded link
                                                                                                                    all). Information will be used to answer
                                                  processes and activities, demonstrate                             key program assessment questions,                      in an email invitation that is unique to
                                                  program impact, and inform decision                               specifically: ‘‘Is PHAP a quality                      that alumnus; each alumnus will only
                                                  making about future program direction.                            program?’’, ‘‘Is PHAP an effective                     have access to his/her link to the
                                                  The purpose of this information                                   program?’’, and ‘‘What is the impact of                assessment Web site. The total
                                                  collection request (ICR) is to gain                               PHAP?’’                                                estimated burden is 8 minutes per
                                                  approval to follow alumni career                                     CDC will administer the PHAP                        respondent per assessment. The total
                                                  progression following participation in                            Alumni Assessment at two different                     annualized estimated burden is 21
                                                  PHAP. The ICR will enable the program                             time points (1 year post-graduation, and               hours.
                                                  to demonstrate evidence of program                                3 years post-graduation) to PHAP                         There are no costs to respondents
                                                  outcomes, specifically to document how                            alumni. Assessment questions will                      except their time.
                                                  many alumni are retained as members of                            remain consistent at each

                                                                                                                   ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
                                                                                                                                                                                                              Average
                                                                                                                                                                                              Number of
                                                                                                                                                                           Number of                        burden per
                                                                   Type of respondent                                                 Form name                                             responses per
                                                                                                                                                                          respondents                        response
                                                                                                                                                                                              respondent     (in hours)

                                                  PHAP Alumni ..................................................   PHAP Alumni Assessment .............................      160                 1             8/60



                                                  Leroy A. Richardson,                                              skin notations and supporting technical                Office, 1150 Tusculum Avenue, Room
                                                  Chief, Information Collection Review Office,                      documents entitled, Skin Notations                     155, Cincinnati, OH 45226–1998.
                                                  Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the                     Profiles, for 19 chemicals. NIOSH is                   FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                  Associate Director for Science, Office of the                     requesting technical reviews of the draft              Naomi Hudson, NIOSH Robert A. Taft
                                                  Director, Centers for Disease Control and                         Skin Notation Profiles.
                                                  Prevention.
                                                                                                                                                                           Laboratories, MS–C32, 1190 Tusculum
                                                                                                                    DATES:Electronic or written comments                   Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45226. (513)533–
                                                  [FR Doc. 2015–10183 Filed 4–30–15; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                                    must be received by June 30, 2015.                     8388 (not a toll free number).
                                                  BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
                                                                                                                                                                           SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
                                                                                                                    ADDRESSES:   You may submit comments,
                                                                                                                    identified by CDC–2015–0021 and                        review follows the publication of 22
                                                  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND                                          docket number NIOSH 153–C, by any of                   Skin Notation Profiles, Docket Number
                                                  HUMAN SERVICES                                                    the following methods:                                 NIOSH 153–A http://www.cdc.gov/
                                                                                                                                                                           niosh/docket/archive/docket153A.html
                                                                                                                      • Federal eRulemaking Portal:                        and the external review of an additional
                                                  Centers for Disease Control and
                                                                                                                    www.regulations.gov. Follow the                        25 Skin Notation Profiles, Docket
                                                  Prevention
                                                                                                                    instructions for submitting comments.                  Number NIOSH 153–B http://
                                                  [Docket Number CDC–2015–0021, NIOSH                                 • Mail: National Institute for                       www.cdc.gov/niosh/docket/archive/
                                                  153–C]                                                            Occupational Safety and Health, NIOSH                  docket153B.html. To facilitate the
                                                                                                                    Docket Office, 1090 Tusculum Avenue,                   review of these documents, NIOSH
                                                  Request for the Technical Review of 19                            MS C–34, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226–1998.
                                                  Draft Skin Notation Assignments and                                                                                      requests that the following questions be
                                                                                                                      Instructions: All information received               taken into consideration for each Skin
                                                  Skin Notation Profiles
                                                                                                                    in response to this notice must include                Notation Profile:
                                                  AGENCY:  National Institute for                                   the agency name and docket number                         1. Does this document clearly outline
                                                  Occupational Safety and Health                                    [CDC–2015–0021; NIOSH 153–C]. All                      the systemic health hazards associated
                                                  (NIOSH) of the Centers for Disease                                relevant comments received will be                     with exposures of the skin to the
                                                  Control and Prevention (CDC),                                     posted without change to                               chemical? If not, what specific
                                                  Department of Health and Human                                    www.regulations.gov, including any                     information is missing from the
                                                  Services (HHS).                                                   personal information provided. All                     document?
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  ACTION: Request for information and                               electronic comments should be                             2. If the SYS or SYS (FATAL)
                                                  comment.                                                          formatted as Microsoft Word. For access                notations are assigned, are the rationale
                                                                                                                    to the docket to read background                       and logic behind the assignment clear?
                                                  SUMMARY:  The National Institute for                              documents or comments received, go to                  If not assigned, is the logic clear why it
                                                  Occupational Safety and Health                                    www.regulations.gov. All information                   was not (e.g., insufficient data, no
                                                  (NIOSH) of the Centers for Disease                                received in response to this notice will               identified health hazard)?
                                                  Control and Prevention (CDC) is                                   also be available for public examination                  3. Does this document clearly outline
                                                  conducting a public review of the draft                           and copying at the NIOSH Docket                        the direct (localized) health hazards


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014      18:14 Apr 30, 2015      Jkt 235001    PO 00000     Frm 00041   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM    01MYN1



Document Created: 2018-02-21 10:20:31
Document Modified: 2018-02-21 10:20:31
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation80 FR 24931 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR