80 FR 25943 - Defensin Proteins (SoD2 and SoD7) Derived From Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) in Citrus Plants; Temporary Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 87 (May 6, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 87 (May 6, 2015)
| Page Range | 25943-25946 | |
| FR Document | 2015-10486 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 6, 2015)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 25943-25946] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-10486] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 174 [EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0834; FRL-9926-99] Defensin Proteins (SoD2 and SoD7) Derived From Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) in Citrus Plants; Temporary Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a temporary exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of SoD2 and SoD7, two defensin proteins derived from spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.), in or on citrus when used as plant-incorporated protectants (PIPs) in accordance with the terms of Experimental Use Permit (EUP) No. 88232-EUP-1. Southern Gardens Citrus submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting the temporary tolerance exemption. This regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level for residues of SoD2 and SoD7 in or on citrus. The temporary tolerance exemption expires on April 18, 2018. DATES: This regulation is effective May 6, 2015. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before July 6, 2015, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0834, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert McNally, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 [[Page 25944]] Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. The following list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include:Crop production (NAICS code 111). Animal production (NAICS code 112). Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311). Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532). B. How can I get electronic access to other related information? You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the Government Publishing Office's e-CFR site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl. C. How can I file an objection or hearing request? Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0834 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before July 6, 2015. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b). In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0834, by one of the following methods: Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. II. Background and Statutory Framework In the Federal Register of January 28, 2015 (80 FR 4525) (FRL-9921- 55), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance petition (PP 4F8289) by Southern Gardens Citrus, 1820 Country Road 833, Clewiston, FL 33440. The petition requested that 40 CFR part 174 be amended by establishing a temporary exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of spinach defensin (SoD2 and SoD7) proteins in or on citrus. That document referenced a summary of the petition prepared by the petitioner Southern Gardens Citrus, which is available in the docket, http://www.regulations.gov. A comment was received on the notice of filing. EPA's response to this comment is discussed in Unit VII.C. Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe '' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure. Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set forth in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . .'' Additionally, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D) requires that the Agency consider ``available information concerning the cumulative effects of a particular pesticide's residues'' and ``other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.'' EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. First, EPA determines the toxicity of pesticides. Second, EPA examines exposure to the pesticide through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as a result of pesticide use in residential settings. III. Toxicological Profile Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and other relevant information in support of this action and considered its validity, completeness and reliability, and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA has also considered available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and children. Diverse defensin proteins are expressed by most eukaryotic species to combat various bacterial and fungal organisms. Homologous proteins have also diverged in evolution to provide functions related to plant stresses such as heat and drought. There is a long history of mammalian consumption of the entire spinach plant (both raw and cooked) as food, without causing any known deleterious human health effects or any evidence of toxicity. Spinach plant leaves have long been part of the human diet and there have been no findings that indicate toxicity or allergenicity of spinach proteins. Spinach is commonly regarded as a ``super food'' that serves as an excellent source of vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants. Recent U.S. consumption statistics indicate that, on average, 2 lbs. of spinach are consumed per person per year in the United States. ``Spinach Profile,'' Agricultural Marketing Resource Center (June 2013) (http://www.agmrc.org/commodities_products/vegetables/spinach-profile/ ). Similarly, citrus whole fruits and juices have been an important part of the [[Page 25945]] American and international diets for centuries. ``History of Citrus,'' All Foods Natural (2013) (available online at: http://www.allfoodnatural.com/article/history-of-citrus.html). Available studies demonstrate that spinach defensin 2 (SoD2) and spinach defensin 7 (SoD7) proteins have very low oral toxicity. In an acute oral toxicity study conducted with a single dose of 5,000 milligram/kilogram (mg/kg) of microbial-produced SoD2 protein, no evidence of toxic or adverse effects was observed. Due to the high similarity between SoD2 and SoD7, the toxicity assessment is applicable to both proteins. In an in vitro study, microbial-produced SoD2 and SoD7 proteins were rapidly and extensively hydrolyzed in stimulated gastric and intestinal conditions in the presence of pepsin (at pH 1.2) and pancreatin, respectively. Both microbial-produced SoD2 and SoD7 proteins demonstrated half-lives of approximately five minutes when subjected to pepsin digest, and both proteins were completely proteolyzed to amino acids and small peptide fragments in less than one minute in the presence of 0.15 milligram/liter (mg/ml) pancreatin. These results indicate that both the SoD2 and SoD7 proteins are highly susceptible to degradation in conditions similar to the human digestive tract. A literature search was performed to identify any published studies that might implicate these spinach proteins as allergens. No scientific references were found to suggest possible allergenicity associated with these spinach proteins. Sequence comparisons were made between the novel proteins from spinach, SoD2 and SoD7, against those of known and putative allergens using FASTA3 to search the AllergenOnline.org database using full-length matches, sliding window of 80 amino acids and finally 8-mer identity searches. In addition, the sequences were searched against the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Protein database without keyword limits to identify highly related proteins and with the keyword limit of allergen, to find any high scoring identity matches to proteins annotated as allergens, as a check on the AllergenOnline.org data. No significant sequence matches were found between either SoD2 or SoD7 and any allergens. Thus there are no potential safety concerns related to allergenicity that would require further testing. IV. Aggregate Exposures In examining aggregate exposure, FFDCA section 408 directs EPA to consider available information concerning exposures from the pesticide residue in food and all other non-occupational exposures, including drinking water from ground water or surface water and exposure through pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or buildings (residential and other indoor uses). The Agency has considered available information on the aggregate exposure levels of consumers (and major identifiable subgroups of consumers) to the pesticide chemical residue and to other related substances. These considerations include dietary exposure under the tolerance exemption and all other tolerances or exemptions in effect for the plant-incorporated protectant chemical residue, and exposure from non-occupational sources. The Agency anticipates that there may be dietary exposure to the pesticide from the consumption of citrus products. In addition, people have a long history of consumption of spinach and will continue to be exposed to defensin proteins through consumption of spinach. Since the PIP is integrated into the plants genome, the Agency has concluded, based upon previous science reviews, that residues in drinking water will be extremely low or non-existent. Non-occupational exposure via the skin or inhalation is not likely since the plant-incorporated protectant is contained within plant cells, which essentially eliminates these exposure routes or reduces these exposure routes to negligible. In any event, there are no non- dietary non-occupational uses of SoD2 and SoD7 as it is only used in agricultural settings. V. Cumulative Effects From Substances With a Common Mechanism of Toxicity Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.'' Since SoD2 and SoD7 proteins do not act through a toxic mode of action nor do the SoD2 and SoD7 proteins appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances, the proteins do not have a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances; therefore, the requirements of section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) do not apply. VI. Determination of Safety for U.S. Population, Infants and Children FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) provides that, in considering the establishment of a tolerance or tolerance exemption for a pesticide chemical residue, EPA shall assess the available information about consumption patterns among infants and children, special susceptibility of infants and children to pesticide chemical residues, and the cumulative effects on infants and children of the residues and other substances with a common mechanism of toxicity. In addition, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) provides that EPA shall apply an additional tenfold (10X) margin of exposure (safety) for infants and children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity and exposure unless EPA determines that a different margin of exposure (safety) will be safe for infants and children. This additional margin of exposure (safety) is commonly referred to as the Food Quality Protection Act Safety Factor (FQPA SF). In applying this provision, EPA either retains the default value of 10X or uses a different additional safety factor when reliable data available to EPA support the choice of a different factor. Based on the information discussed in Unit III., EPA concludes that there are no threshold effects of concern to infants, children, or adults from exposure to the spinach defensin proteins SoD2 and SoD7. As a result, EPA concludes that no additional margin of exposure (safety) is necessary to protect infants and children and that not adding any additional margin of exposure (safety) will be safe for infants and children. Therefore, based on the discussion in Units III and IV, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the U.S. population, including infants and children, from aggregate exposure to the residues of spinach defensin proteins SoD2 and SoD7 in citrus, when it is used as a plant-incorporated protectant. Such exposure includes all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information. The Agency has arrived at this conclusion based on a lack of toxicity and allergenicity of the SoD2 and SoD7 proteins. VII. Other Considerations A. Endocrine Disruptors The pesticidal active ingredient is a protein, derived from a source that is not known to exert an influence on the endocrine system. Therefore, the Agency is not requiring information on the endocrine effects of the plant-incorporated protectant at this time. [[Page 25946]] B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology A standard operating procedure for an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection and quantification of spinach defensin proteins SoD2 and SoD7 in citrus plant tissue has been judged useful for its intended purpose. C. Response to Comments EPA received one comment relevant to this petition. The comment supports this tolerance exemption and therefore warrants no response. VIII. Conclusion The Agency concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the U.S. population, including infants and children, from aggregate exposure residues of spinach defensin SoD2 and SoD7 proteins in or on citrus. This includes all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information. The Agency has arrived at this conclusion because, as discussed previously no toxicity to mammals has been observed, nor is there any indication of allergenicity potential for the plant- incorporated protectant. Therefore, an exemption is established for residues of spinach defensin SoD2 and SoD7 proteins in or on citrus when the protein is used as a PIP in citrus plants. IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews This action establishes a temporary exemption from the requirement of a tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the exemption in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not apply. This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this action alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). This action does not involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). X. Congressional Review Act Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 174 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: April 28, 2015. Robert McNally, Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows: PART 174--[AMENDED] 0 1. The authority citation for part 174 continues to read as follows: Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 0 2. Add Sec. 174.535 to subpart W to read as follows: Sec. 174.535 Spinach Defensin proteins; temporary exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. (a) Residues of the defensin protein SoD2 derived from spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) in or on citrus food commodities are temporarily exempt from the requirement of a tolerance when used as a plant- incorporated protectant in citrus plants in accordance with the terms of Experimental Use Permit No. 88232-EUP-1. This temporary exemption from the requirement of a tolerance expires on April 18, 2018. (b) Residues of the defensin protein SoD7 derived from spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) in or on citrus food commodities are temporarily exempt from the requirement of a tolerance when used as a plant- incorporated protectant in citrus plants in accordance with the terms of Experimental Use Permit No. 88232-EUP-1. This temporary exemption from the requirement of a tolerance expires on April 18, 2018. [FR Doc. 2015-10486 Filed 5-5-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 87 / Wednesday, May 6, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 25943
(including delivery by courier), by effected through the electronic filing ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
electronic delivery in accordance with system; AGENCY
§ 4.4(e), or by first-class mail to the lead (ii) Each such party thereby agrees
complaint counsel, with a copy to the 40 CFR Part 174
that, for any document served through
Administrative Law Judge.
(ii) Upon a party other than the electronic filing system, [EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0834; FRL–9926–99]
complaint counsel or upon a third transmission of the notice of electronic
filing provided by the electronic filing Defensin Proteins (SoD2 and SoD7)
party. A copy may be served by personal Derived From Spinach (Spinacia
delivery (including delivery by courier), system shall satisfy the service
oleracea L.) in Citrus Plants;
by electronic delivery in accordance obligations of the serving party; and
Temporary Exemption From the
with § 4.4(e), or by first-class mail, with (iii) A document served via the Requirement of a Tolerance
a copy to the Administrative Law Judge. electronic filing system shall be deemed
If the party is an individual or served on the date the notice of AGENCY: Environmental Protection
partnership, delivery shall be to such electronic filing is transmitted, unless Agency (EPA).
individual or a member of the the serving party learns that the notice ACTION: Final rule.
partnership; if a corporation or of electronic filing did not reach the
unincorporated association, to an officer SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a
person to be served. temporary exemption from the
or agent authorized to accept service of
process therefor. Personal delivery (2) Service by other methods of requirement of a tolerance for residues
includes handing the document to be electronic delivery. (i) In the following of SoD2 and SoD7, two defensin
served to the individual, partner, officer, circumstances, service by other methods proteins derived from spinach (Spinacia
or agent; leaving it at his or her office of electronic delivery (including service oleracea L.), in or on citrus when used
with a person in charge thereof; or, if by email) may be effected as the as plant-incorporated protectants (PIPs)
there is no one in charge or if the office Administrative Law Judge and the in accordance with the terms of
is closed or if the party has no office, Secretary may direct: Experimental Use Permit (EUP) No.
leaving it at his or her dwelling house 88232–EUP–1. Southern Gardens Citrus
(A) The document to be served is
or usual place of abode with some submitted a petition to EPA under the
labeled ‘‘In Camera’’ or ‘‘Confidential’’ Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
person of suitable age and discretion
pursuant to § 4.2(b); (FFDCA), requesting the temporary
then residing therein.
(2) Unless otherwise specified in (B) The party to be served has not tolerance exemption. This regulation
§ 4.4(e), documents served in elected to be served via the electronic eliminates the need to establish a
adjudicative proceedings under part 3 filing system; maximum permissible level for residues
shall be deemed served on the day of (C) The document is to be served of SoD2 and SoD7 in or on citrus. The
personal delivery (including delivery by upon a third party; or temporary tolerance exemption expires
courier), the day of electronic delivery, on April 18, 2018.
or the day of mailing. (D) Service under paragraph (e)(1) of
DATES: This regulation is effective May
(c) Service upon counsel. When this section is unavailable for technical 6, 2015. Objections and requests for
counsel has appeared in a proceeding reasons. hearings must be received on or before
on behalf of a party, service upon such (ii) If documents labeled ‘‘In Camera’’ July 6, 2015, and must be filed in
counsel of any document, other than a or ‘‘Confidential’’ are being served accordance with the instructions
complaint, shall be deemed service under this paragraph (e)(2), the provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
upon the party. However, service of documents must be encrypted prior to Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
those documents specified in paragraph transit or must be transferred through a INFORMATION).
(a)(1) of this section shall be in secure file transfer protocol. Service of
accordance with paragraphs (a)(1)(i), ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
a document under this paragraph (e)(2) identified by docket identification (ID)
(ii), and (iii) of this section. shall be complete upon transmission by
(d) Proof of service. In an adjudicative number EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0834, is
proceeding under part 3, documents the serving party, unless the serving available at http://www.regulations.gov
presented for filing shall contain proof party learns that the document did not or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
of service in the form of a statement of reach the person to be served. Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
the date and manner of service and of (f) Service of process upon the in the Environmental Protection Agency
the names of the persons served, Commission. Documents served upon Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
certified by the person who made the Commission may be served by Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
service. Proof of service must appear on personal delivery (including delivery by Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
or be affixed to the documents filed. courier) or by first-class mail to the 20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
(e) Service by electronic delivery in an is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Office of the Secretary of the
adjudicative proceeding under part 3 of Monday through Friday, excluding legal
Commission.
this chapter—(1) Service through the holidays. The telephone number for the
electronic filing system. A party may By direction of the Commission. Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
elect, for documents labeled ‘‘Public’’ Donald S. Clark, and the telephone number for the OPP
pursuant to § 4.2(b), to be served via the Secretary. Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
electronic filing system provided by the [FR Doc. 2015–10517 Filed 5–5–15; 8:45 am]
the visitor instructions and additional
Office of the Secretary. The electronic information about the docket available
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
filing system cannot be used to serve at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
third parties. For parties that have FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
elected to be served via the electronic Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
filing system: Pollution Prevention Division (7511P),
(i) Service of documents labeled Office of Pesticide Programs,
‘‘Public’’ pursuant to § 4.2(b) may be Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:11 May 05, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\06MYR1.SGM 06MYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_26030/page/1.svg)
![25946 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 87 / Wednesday, May 6, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, Dated: April 28, 2015.
A standard operating procedure for an 1994). Robert McNally,
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Since tolerances and exemptions that Director, Biopesticides and Pollution
are established on the basis of a petition Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide
the detection and quantification of Programs.
spinach defensin proteins SoD2 and under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
SoD7 in citrus plant tissue has been the exemption in this final rule, do not Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
judged useful for its intended purpose. require the issuance of a proposed rule, amended as follows:
the requirements of the Regulatory
C. Response to Comments PART 174—[AMENDED]
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
EPA received one comment relevant seq.), do not apply. ■ 1. The authority citation for part 174
to this petition. The comment supports continues to read as follows:
This action directly regulates growers,
this tolerance exemption and therefore
food processors, food handlers, and food Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
warrants no response.
retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or ■ 2. Add § 174.535 to subpart W to read
VIII. Conclusion
as follows:
The Agency concludes that there is a distribution of power and
reasonable certainty that no harm will responsibilities established by Congress § 174.535 Spinach Defensin proteins;
result to the U.S. population, including in the preemption provisions of FFDCA temporary exemption from the requirement
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency of a tolerance.
infants and children, from aggregate
exposure residues of spinach defensin has determined that this action will not (a) Residues of the defensin protein
SoD2 and SoD7 proteins in or on citrus. have a substantial direct effect on States SoD2 derived from spinach (Spinacia
This includes all anticipated dietary or tribal governments, on the oleracea L.) in or on citrus food
exposures and all other exposures for relationship between the national commodities are temporarily exempt
which there is reliable information. The government and the States or tribal from the requirement of a tolerance
Agency has arrived at this conclusion governments, or on the distribution of when used as a plant-incorporated
because, as discussed previously no power and responsibilities among the protectant in citrus plants in accordance
toxicity to mammals has been observed, various levels of government or between with the terms of Experimental Use
nor is there any indication of the Federal Government and Indian Permit No. 88232–EUP–1. This
allergenicity potential for the plant- tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined temporary exemption from the
incorporated protectant. that Executive Order 13132, entitled requirement of a tolerance expires on
Therefore, an exemption is ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10, April 18, 2018.
1999) and Executive Order 13175, (b) Residues of the defensin protein
established for residues of spinach
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination SoD7 derived from spinach (Spinacia
defensin SoD2 and SoD7 proteins in or
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR oleracea L.) in or on citrus food
on citrus when the protein is used as a
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply commodities are temporarily exempt
PIP in citrus plants.
to this action. In addition, this action from the requirement of a tolerance
IX. Statutory and Executive Order does not impose any enforceable duty or when used as a plant-incorporated
Reviews contain any unfunded mandate as protectant in citrus plants in accordance
This action establishes a temporary described under Title II of the Unfunded with the terms of Experimental Use
exemption from the requirement of a Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. Permit No. 88232–EUP–1. This
tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) 1501 et seq.). temporary exemption from the
in response to a petition submitted to requirement of a tolerance expires on
This action does not involve any April 18, 2018.
the Agency. The Office of Management technical standards that would require
and Budget (OMB) has exempted these [FR Doc. 2015–10486 Filed 5–5–15; 8:45 am]
Agency consideration of voluntary
types of actions from review under consensus standards pursuant to section BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Executive Order 12866, entitled 12(d) of the National Technology
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ (58 Transfer and Advancement Act
FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). AGENCY
this action has been exempted from
review under Executive Order 12866, X. Congressional Review Act
40 CFR Part 174
this action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, entitled ‘‘Actions Pursuant to the Congressional Review [EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0454; FRL–9926–23]
Concerning Regulations That Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, submit a report containing this rule and Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A.105
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May other required information to the U.S. Protein in Soybean; Exemption From
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, Senate, the U.S. House of the Requirement of a Tolerance
entitled ‘‘Protection of Children from Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Agency (EPA).
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major ACTION: Final rule.
This action does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an
approval under the Paperwork List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 174 exemption from the requirement of a
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et tolerance for residues of the Bacillus
seq.), nor does it require any special Environmental protection, thuringiensis (B.t.) Cry1A.105 protein in
considerations under Executive Order Administrative practice and procedure, or on soybean when the protein is used
12898, entitled ‘‘Federal Actions to Agricultural commodities, Pesticides as a plant-incorporated protectant (PIP)
Address Environmental Justice in and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping in soybean. Monsanto Company
Minority Populations and Low-Income requirements. submitted a petition to EPA under the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:11 May 05, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\06MYR1.SGM 06MYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_26030/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-16 07:41:09
Document Modified: 2015-12-16 07:41:09
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This regulation is effective May 6, 2015. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before July 6, 2015, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). | |
| Contact | Robert McNally, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 25943 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Administrative Practice and Procedure; Agricultural Commodities; Pesticides and Pests and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR