80 FR 26227 - Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 88 (May 7, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 88 (May 7, 2015)
| Page Range | 26227-26229 | |
| FR Document | 2015-11083 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 88 (Thursday, May 7, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 26227-26229] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-11083] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-983] Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2014 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. [[Page 26228]] SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on drawn stainless steel sinks (drawn sinks) from the People's Republic of China (PRC). The administrative review covers 11 exporters, of which the Department selected two as mandatory respondents for individual examination (i.e., Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Co., Ltd. (Dongyuan) and Guangdong Yingao Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd. (Yingao)). The period of review (POR) is October 4, 2012, through March 31, 2014. The Department preliminarily finds that Dongyuan and Yingao both made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the POR. If these preliminary results are adopted in the final results of this review, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective Date: May 7, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian C. Smith or Brandon Custard, AD/ CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1766 and (202) 482-1823, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The products covered by the order include drawn stainless steel sinks. Imports of subject merchandise are currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 7324.10.0000 and 7324.10.0010. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ For a complete description of the Scope of the Order, see ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated April 30, 2015 (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), issued concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export prices have been calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Because the PRC is a non-market economy (NME) within the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, NV has been calculated in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov; the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is also available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Enforcement and Compliance's Web site at http://www.trade.gov/enforcement/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as the Appendix to this notice. Preliminary Results of Review Because Feidong Import & Export Co., Ltd., Shunde Native Produce Import & Export Co, Ltd. of Guangdong, and Zhongshan Silk Import & Export Group Co., Ltd. of Guangdong did not demonstrate they were entitled to a separate rate, the Department preliminarily finds these companies to be part of the PRC-wide entity.\2\ The rate previously established for the PRC-wide entity is 76.53 percent.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Pursuant to the Department's change in practice, the Department no longer considers the NME entity as an exporter conditionally subject to administrative reviews. See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65970 (November 4, 2013). Under this practice, the NME entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or the Department self-initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party requested a review of the entity, the entity is not under review and the entity's rate is not subject to change. \3\ The PRC-wide rate determined in the investigation was 76.53 percent. See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 78 FR 21592 (April 11, 2013). This rate was adjusted for export subsidies and estimated domestic subsidy pass through to determine the cash deposit rate (76.45 percent) collected for companies in the PRC-wide entity. See explanation in Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China: Investigation, Final Determination, 78 FR 13019 (February 26, 2013). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department preliminarily determines that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period October 4, 2012, through March 31, 2014: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporters dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Foshan Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd.*........................ 2.14 Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Co., Ltd...... 0.81 Guangdong New Shichu Import & Export Company Limited *.. 2.14 Guangdong Yingao Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd.............. 5.55 Yuyao Afa Kitchenware Co., Ltd.*........................ 2.14 Zhongshan Newecan Enterprise Development Corporation 2.14 Limited *.............................................. Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd.*................ 2.14 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * This company demonstrated that it qualified for a separate rate in this administrative review. The rate for this company is the average of the weighted-average dumping margins assigned to Dongyuan and Yingao. See the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Disclosure and Public Comment The Department intends to disclose to the parties the calculations performed for these preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results of review.\4\ Rebuttals to case briefs may be filed no later than five days after the written comments are filed and all rebuttal comments must be limited to comments raised in the case briefs.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c). \5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of publication of this notice.\6\ Hearing requests should contain the following information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral presentations will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 [[Page 26229]] Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \7\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unless otherwise extended, the Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised in the case briefs, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\8\ The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication of the final results of this review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For each individually-examined respondent in this review (i.e., Dongyuan and Yingao) which has a weighted-average dumping margin which is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), we will calculate importer- (or customer-) specific per-unit duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's (or customer's) examined sales to the total sales quantity associated with those sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\9\ Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer- (or customer-) specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ In these preliminary results, the Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the respondents which were not selected for individual examination in this administrative review and which qualified for a separate rate, the assessment rate will be equal to the average of the weighted-average dumping margins assigned to Dongyuan and Yingao in the final results of this review. For the final results, if we continue to treat the three companies identified above as part of the PRC-wide entity, we will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 76.45 percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR which were produced and/or exported by those companies. The Department announced a refinement to its assessment practice in NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by companies individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. In addition, if the Department determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (NME Antidumping Proceedings). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed above that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that rate established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then a cash deposit rate of zero will be established for that company); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC-wide entity, which is 76.45 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these results of reviews in accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and 777(i)(l) of the Act. Dated: April 30, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of the Methodology A. Non-Market Economy Country B. Separate Rates Determination C. The PRC-Wide Entity D. Surrogate Country 1. Economic Comparability 2. Significant Producer of Comparable Merchandise 3. Data Availability E. Date of Sale F. Fair Value Comparisons 1. Determination of Comparison Method 2. Export Price 3. Value-Added Tax 4. Normal Value G. Factor Valuation Methodology H. Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of the Act I. Currency Conversion V. Conclusion [FR Doc. 2015-11083 Filed 5-6-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 88 / Thursday, May 7, 2015 / Notices 26227
have any reviewable entries during the notice.9 Requests should contain the Cash Deposit Requirements
POR. Absent any evidence of shipments party’s name, address, and telephone Also in accordance with section
being placed on the record, pursuant to number, the number of participants, and 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the Department
19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), in the final a list of the issues to be discussed. If a intends to instruct CBP to collect cash
results, we intend to rescind the request for a hearing is made, the deposits of estimated countervailing
administrative review of this company. Department intends to hold the hearing duties in the amount shown above for
For additional information regarding at the U.S. Department of Commerce, Dongyuan, on shipments of subject
this determination, see the Preliminary 14th Street and Constitution Avenue merchandise entered, or withdrawn
Decision Memorandum. NW., Washington, DC 20230, on a date from warehouse, for consumption on or
Preliminary Results of the Review and at a time and location to be after the date of publication of the final
determined. Parties should confirm by results of this review. For all non-
In accordance with 19 CFR telephone the date, time, and location of
351.221(b)(4)(i), we calculated an reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to
the hearing two days before the continue to collect cash deposits at the
individual subsidy rate for Dongyuan scheduled date.
for the period August 6, 2012, through most-recent company-specific or all-
December 31, 2013. We calculated a rate All submissions, with limited others rate applicable to the company,
for 2012, which will be applicable to exceptions, must be filed electronically as appropriate. These cash deposit
entries made during the period August using ACCESS.10 An electronically filed requirements, when imposed, shall
6, 2012, through December 31, 2012, documents must be received remain in effect until further notice.
and a rate for 2013, which will be successfully in their entirety by the These preliminary results are issued
applicable to entries during the period Department’s electronic records system, and published in accordance with
January 1, 2013, through December 31, ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act
2013. We preliminarily find that the net on the due date. Documents excepted and 19 CFR 351.213 and 351.221(b)(4).
subsidy rates for Dongyuan are as from the electronic submission
Dated: April 30, 2015.
follows: requirements must be filed manually
Paul Piquado,
(i.e. in paper form) with the APO/
Dockets Unit in Room 18022 and Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Subsidy Subsidy Compliance.
Company rate rate stamped with the date and time of
(percent) (percent) receipt by 5 p.m. ET on the due date.11 Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in
2013 2012
Unless the deadline is extended the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
Guangdong pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 1. Summary
Dongyuan Kitch- Act, the Department will issue the final 2. Background
enware Industrial results of this administrative review, 3. Scope of the Order
Co., Ltd ............. 9.83 3.91 including our analysis of and responses 4. Partial Rescission of the Administrative
to issues raised by the parties in their Review
Disclosure and Public Comment comments, within 120 days after issuing 5. Intent to Rescind, in Part, the
these preliminary results. Administrative Review
The Department intends to disclose 6. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and
calculations performed for these Assessment Rates Adverse Inferences
preliminary results to the parties within 7. Subsidy Valuation Information
five days of the date of publication of In accordance with 19 CFR 8. Analysis of Programs
this notice.5 Interested parties may 351.221(b)(4)(i), we assigned a subsidy 9. Recommendation
submit case briefs no later than 30 days rate for the producer/exporter subject to
Appendix II—Companies for Which the
after the day on which these this administrative review. Upon
Review Is Rescinded
preliminary results are published in the issuance of the final results, the
Federal Register.6 Rebuttal briefs, Department shall determine, and CBP 1. Foshan Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd.
which must be limited to issues raised shall assess, countervailing duties on all 2. Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co.,
in case briefs, may be submitted by no appropriate entries covered by this Ltd.
later than five days after the deadline for review. We intend to issue instructions 3. Zhongshan Silk Imp. & Exp. Group Co.,
Ltd. of Guangdong
case briefs.7 Parties who submit case to CBP 15 days after publication of the 4. Zhongshan Newecan Enterprise
briefs or rebuttal briefs in this final results of this review. Development Corporation Limited
proceeding should submit with each For the rescinded companies, [FR Doc. 2015–11088 Filed 5–6–15; 8:45 am]
argument: (1) A statement of the issue; countervailing duties shall be assessed BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
(2) a brief summary of the argument; at rates equal to the cash deposit of
and (3) a table of authorities.8 The estimated countervailing duties required
summary of the argument should be at the time of entry, or withdrawal from DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
limited to five pages total, including warehouse, for consumption, during the
footnotes. period August 6, 2012, through International Trade Administration
Interested parties who wish to request December 31, 2013, in accordance with
a hearing, or to participate if one is 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department [A–570–983]
requested, must submit a written intends to issue appropriate assessment
request to the Assistant Secretary for instructions directly to CBP 15 days Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. after publication of this notice. People’s Republic of China:
Department of Commerce within 30 Preliminary Results of the
days after the date of publication of this Antidumping Duty Administrative
9 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
10 See generally 19 CFR 351.303. Review; 2012–2014
5 See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 11 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
6 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
7 See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
Administrative Protective Order Procedure, 76 FR International Trade Administration,
8 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 39263 (July 6, 2011). Department of Commerce.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:07 May 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM 07MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_26315/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 88 / Thursday, May 7, 2015 / Notices 26229
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, The Department announced a Secretary’s presumption that
DC 20230.7 refinement to its assessment practice in reimbursement of antidumping duties
Unless otherwise extended, the NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement occurred and the subsequent assessment
Department intends to issue the final in practice, for entries that were not of double antidumping duties.
results of this administrative review, reported in the U.S. sales databases We are issuing and publishing these
which will include the results of its submitted by companies individually results of reviews in accordance with
analysis of issues raised in the case examined during this review, the sections 751(a)(l) and 777(i)(l) of the
briefs, within 120 days of publication of Department will instruct CBP to Act.
these preliminary results, pursuant to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide Dated: April 30, 2015.
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. rate. In addition, if the Department
Paul Piquado,
determines that an exporter under
Assessment Rates review had no shipments of the subject Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Upon issuance of the final results, the merchandise, any suspended entries
Department will determine, and CBP that entered under that exporter’s case Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
shall assess, antidumping duties on all number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
appropriate entries covered by this be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.10
I. Summary
review.8 The Department intends to II. Background
Cash Deposit Requirements
issue appropriate assessment III. Scope of the Order
instructions to CBP 15 days after the The following cash deposit IV. Discussion of the Methodology
publication of the final results of this requirements will be effective upon A. Non-Market Economy Country
review. publication of the final results of this B. Separate Rates Determination
For each individually-examined administrative review for all shipments C. The PRC-Wide Entity
respondent in this review (i.e., of the subject merchandise from the PRC D. Surrogate Country
Dongyuan and Yingao) which has a entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 1. Economic Comparability
weighted-average dumping margin for consumption on or after the 2. Significant Producer of Comparable
publication date, as provided for by Merchandise
which is not zero or de minimis (i.e.,
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 3. Data Availability
less than 0.5 percent), we will calculate E. Date of Sale
importer- (or customer-) specific per- the companies listed above that have a F. Fair Value Comparisons
unit duty assessment rates based on the separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 1. Determination of Comparison Method
ratio of the total amount of dumping be that rate established in the final 2. Export Price
calculated for the importer’s (or results of this review (except, if the rate 3. Value-Added Tax
customer’s) examined sales to the total is zero or de minimis, then a cash 4. Normal Value
sales quantity associated with those deposit rate of zero will be established G. Factor Valuation Methodology
sales, in accordance with 19 CFR for that company); (2) for previously H. Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of
investigated or reviewed PRC and non- the Act
351.212(b)(1).9 Where either the
PRC exporters that received a separate I. Currency Conversion
respondent’s weighted-average dumping V. Conclusion
margin is zero or de minimis, or an rate in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will [FR Doc. 2015–11083 Filed 5–6–15; 8:45 am]
importer- (or customer-) specific
assessment rate is zero or de minimis, continue to be the existing exporter- BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
we will instruct CBP to liquidate the specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of
appropriate entries without regard to subject merchandise that have not been
found to be entitled to a separate rate, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
antidumping duties.
For the respondents which were not the cash deposit rate will be the rate for
the PRC-wide entity, which is 76.45 International Trade Administration
selected for individual examination in
this administrative review and which percent; and (4) for all non-PRC [A–520–803]
qualified for a separate rate, the exporters of subject merchandise which
assessment rate will be equal to the have not received their own rate, the Preliminary Negative Determination of
average of the weighted-average cash deposit rate will be the rate Circumvention of the Antidumping
dumping margins assigned to Dongyuan applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate
and Yingao in the final results of this supplied that non-PRC exporter. These Film, Sheet, and Strip From the United
review. deposit requirements, when imposed, Arab Emirates
For the final results, if we continue to shall remain in effect until further
notice. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
treat the three companies identified International Trade Administration,
above as part of the PRC-wide entity, we Notification to Importers Commerce.
will instruct CBP to apply an ad
This notice also serves as a SUMMARY: On July 29, 2014, pursuant to
valorem assessment rate of 76.45
preliminary reminder to importers of allegations by Polyplex USA LLC and
percent to all entries of subject their responsibility under 19 CFR
merchandise during the POR which Flex USA Inc., the Department of
351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding Commerce (the Department) initiated an
were produced and/or exported by those the reimbursement of antidumping
companies. anti-circumvention inquiry to determine
duties prior to liquidation of the whether imports of polyethylene
relevant entries during this review
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
7 See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET
8 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
period. Failure to comply with this Film) from the Kingdom of Bahrain
9 In these preliminary results, the Department requirement could result in the (Bahrain) produced by JBF Bahrain
applied the assessment rate calculation method S.P.C. (JBF Bahrain) are circumventing
adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation 10 For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-
the antidumping order on PET Film
of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
from the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (October 24, 2011) (NME Antidumping We preliminarily determine that PET
(February 14, 2012). Proceedings). Film produced by JBF Bahrain in
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:57 May 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM 07MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_26315/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-16 07:49:51
Document Modified: 2015-12-16 07:49:51
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Brian C. Smith or Brandon Custard, AD/ CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1766 and (202) 482-1823, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 26227 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR