80 FR 27100 - Safety Zone; Monongahela River Mile 68.0-68.8; Rices Landing, PA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 91 (May 12, 2015)

Page Range		27100-27102
FR Document		2015-11442

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the Monongahela River mile 68.0 to mile 68.8. This safety zone is needed to protect vessels transiting the area and event spectators from the hazards associated with the Rices Landing Riverfest Fireworks Display. Entry into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Pittsburgh or a designated representative.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27100-27102]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11442]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2015-0284]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Monongahela River Mile 68.0-68.8; Rices Landing, PA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the 
Monongahela River mile 68.0 to mile 68.8. This safety zone is needed to 
protect vessels transiting the area and event spectators from the 
hazards associated with the Rices Landing Riverfest Fireworks Display. 
Entry into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by 
the Captain of the Port Pittsburgh or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 9:15 p.m. until 10:30 p.m. on June 
12, 2015 and June 13, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket 
USCG-2015-0284. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the 
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also 
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground 
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Jennifer Haggins, Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh, U.S. 
Coast Guard, at telephone 412-221-0807, email 
[email protected]. If you have questions on viewing or 
submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl F. Collins, Program 
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

A. Regulatory History and Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior 
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not using the NPRM process. The Coast Guard received 
notice on April 7, 2015 that this display would take place. After full 
review of the event information and location, the Coast Guard 
determined that a safety zone is necessary. Delaying this rule by 
completing the full NPRM process would unnecessarily delay the safety 
zone and be contrary to public interest because the safety zone is 
needed to protect transiting vessels, spectators, and the personnel 
involved in the display from the hazards associated with fireworks 
displays taking place near and over the waterway. The fireworks display 
has been advertised and the local community has prepared for the event. 
Completing the full NPRM process could also unnecessarily delay the 
planned event and possibly interfere with contractual obligations.
    For the same reasons, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard 
finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 
30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying this rule 
by providing a full 30 days notice would be contrary to public interest 
because immediate action is needed to protect persons and property in 
the area during the land-based fireworks display.

B. Basis and Purpose

    On June 12, 2015 and June 13, 2015, as a part of the Rices Landing 
Riverfest Fireworks Display, the Rices Landing Volunteer Fire 
Department will sponsor a land-based fireworks display. The display 
will take place in the vicinity of Old Lock 6 on the Monongahela River 
at mile 68.3. This event presents safety

[[Page 27101]]

hazards for spectators and vessels navigating in the area, and 
therefore a safety zone is needed to protect persons and property from 
the hazards associated with a fireworks display near and over the 
waterway.
    The legal basis and authorities for this rule are found in 33 
U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1; 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; 
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which 
collectively authorize the Coast Guard to establish and define 
regulatory safety zones.

C. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Final Rule

    The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone for all waters of the 
Monongahela River, from mile 68.0 to mile 68.8, extending the entire 
width of the river. Entry into this zone is prohibited to all vessels 
and persons except persons and vessels specifically authorized by the 
Captain of the Port Pittsburgh. This rule is effective on June 12, 2015 
and June 13, 2015 and will be enforced from 9:15 p.m. until 10:30 p.m.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as 
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and 
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential 
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or 
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and 
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. It is not 
``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of the 
Department of Homeland Security (DHS). This rule is limited in scope 
and will be in effect for a limited time period. Notifications to the 
marine community will be made through local notice to mariners and 
broadcast notice to mariners. Deviation from the rule may be requested 
and will be considered on a case-by-case basis by the Captain of the 
Port or a designated representative. The impacts on routine navigation 
are expected to be minimal.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which 
may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to 
transit the Monongahela River, mile 68.0 to 68.8 from 9:15 p.m. until 
10:30 p.m. on June 12, 2015 and June 13, 2015. This safety zone will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities because this rule is limited in scope and will be in effect 
for a limited time period notifications to the marine community will be 
made through local notice to mariners and broadcast notice to mariners. 
Deviation from the rule may be requested and will be considered on a 
case-by-case basis by the Captain of the Port or a designated 
representative.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, 
above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined 
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT, section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and

[[Page 27102]]

responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive 
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect 
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined 
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not 
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human 
environment. This rule establishes a safety zone for waters of the 
Monongahela River, from mile 68.0 to 68.8. This rule is categorically 
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of figure 2-1 of the 
Commandant Instruction an environmental analysis checklist supporting 
this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are 
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any 
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant 
environmental impact from this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1; 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
2. Temporary Sec.  165.T08-0284 is added to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T08-0284  Safety Zone, Monongahela River, Pittsburgh, PA.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of 
the Monongahela River, mile 68.0 to 68.8, extending the entire width of 
the waterway.
    (b) Effective date. This rule is effective, and will be enforced, 
from 9:15 p.m. until 10:30 p.m. on June 12, 2015 and June 13, 2015.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless 
authorized by the Captain of the Port Pittsburgh or a designated 
representative.
    (2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through the 
zone must request permission from the Captain of the Port Pittsburgh or 
a designated representative. The Captain of the Pittsburgh 
representative may be contacted at 412-221-0807.
    (3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of 
the Captain of the Port Pittsburgh or their designated representative. 
Designated Captain of the Port representatives include United States 
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, and petty officers.
    (d) Information broadcasts. The Captain of the Port Pittsburgh or a 
designated representative will inform the public through broadcast 
notices to mariners of the enforcement period for the safety zone as 
well as any changes in the planned schedule.

    Dated: April 27, 2015.
L.N. Weaver,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Pittsburgh.
[FR Doc. 2015-11442 Filed 5-11-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 91 / Tuesday, May 12, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 27101

hazards for spectators and vessels potential impact of regulations on small between the national government and
navigating in the area, and therefore a entities during rulemaking. the States, or on the distribution of
safety zone is needed to protect persons The Coast Guard certifies under 5 power and responsibilities among the
and property from the hazards U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have various levels of government. We have
associated with a fireworks display near a significant economic impact on a analyzed this rule under that Order and
and over the waterway. substantial number of small entities. determined that this rule does not have
The legal basis and authorities for this This rule will affect the following implications for federalism.
rule are found in 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 entities, some of which may be small
U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05–1; 6.04–1, entities: The owners or operators of 6. Protest Activities
6.04–6, and 160.5; Department of vessels intending to transit the The Coast Guard respects the First
Homeland Security Delegation No. Monongahela River, mile 68.0 to 68.8 Amendment rights of protesters.
0170.1, which collectively authorize the from 9:15 p.m. until 10:30 p.m. on June Protesters are asked to contact the
Coast Guard to establish and define 12, 2015 and June 13, 2015. This safety person listed in the FOR FURTHER
regulatory safety zones. zone will not have a significant INFORMATION CONTACT, section to
economic impact on a substantial coordinate protest activities so that your
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes message can be received without
number of small entities because this
and the Final Rule jeopardizing the safety or security of
rule is limited in scope and will be in
The Coast Guard is establishing a effect for a limited time period people, places or vessels.
safety zone for all waters of the notifications to the marine community
Monongahela River, from mile 68.0 to 7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
will be made through local notice to
mile 68.8, extending the entire width of mariners and broadcast notice to The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
the river. Entry into this zone is mariners. Deviation from the rule may of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
prohibited to all vessels and persons be requested and will be considered on Federal agencies to assess the effects of
except persons and vessels specifically a case-by-case basis by the Captain of their discretionary regulatory actions. In
authorized by the Captain of the Port the Port or a designated representative. particular, the Act addresses actions
Pittsburgh. This rule is effective on June that may result in the expenditure by a
12, 2015 and June 13, 2015 and will be 3. Assistance for Small Entities State, local, or tribal government, in the
enforced from 9:15 p.m. until 10:30 p.m. Under section 213(a) of the Small aggregate, or by the private sector of
Business Regulatory Enforcement $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
D. Regulatory Analyses Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), more in any one year. Though this rule
We developed this rule after we want to assist small entities in will not result in such an expenditure,
considering numerous statutes and understanding this rule. If the rule we do discuss the effects of this rule
executive orders related to rulemaking. would affect your small business, elsewhere in this preamble.
Below we summarize our analyses organization, or governmental
based on a number of these statutes or 8. Taking of Private Property
jurisdiction and you have questions
executive orders. concerning its provisions or options for This rule will not cause a taking of
compliance, please contact the person private property or otherwise have
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION taking implications under Executive
This rule is not a significant CONTACT, above. Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
regulatory action under section 3(f) of Small businesses may send comments Interference with Constitutionally
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory on the actions of Federal employees Protected Property Rights.
Planning and Review, as supplemented who enforce, or otherwise determine
by Executive Order 13563, Improving 9. Civil Justice Reform
compliance with, Federal regulations to
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and the Small Business and Agriculture This rule meets applicable standards
does not require an assessment of Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
potential costs and benefits under and the Regional Small Business Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 Regulatory Fairness Boards. The minimize litigation, eliminate
or under section 1 of Executive Order Ombudsman evaluates these actions ambiguity, and reduce burden.
13563. The Office of Management and annually and rates each agency’s
Budget has not reviewed it under those 10. Protection of Children
responsiveness to small business. If you
Orders. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the wish to comment on actions by We have analyzed this rule under
regulatory policies and procedures of employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– Executive Order 13045, Protection of
the Department of Homeland Security 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Children from Environmental Health
(DHS). This rule is limited in scope and Coast Guard will not retaliate against Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
will be in effect for a limited time small entities that question or complain an economically significant rule and
period. Notifications to the marine about this rule or any policy or action does not create an environmental risk to
community will be made through local of the Coast Guard. health or risk to safety that may
notice to mariners and broadcast notice disproportionately affect children.
to mariners. Deviation from the rule 4. Collection of Information
11. Indian Tribal Governments
may be requested and will be This rule will not call for a new
considered on a case-by-case basis by collection of information under the This rule does not have tribal
the Captain of the Port or a designated Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 implications under Executive Order
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

representative. The impacts on routine U.S.C. 3501–3520). 13175, Consultation and Coordination
navigation are expected to be minimal. with Indian Tribal Governments,
5. Federalism because it does not have a substantial
2. Impact on Small Entities A rule has implications for federalism direct effect on one or more Indian
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of under Executive Order 13132, tribes, on the relationship between the
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct Federal Government and Indian tribes,
requires federal agencies to consider the effect on the States, on the relationship or on the distribution of power and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:43 May 11, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM 12MYR1

27102 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 91 / Tuesday, May 12, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

responsibilities between the Federal § 165.T08–0284 Safety Zone, Monongahela from Washington demonstrating that the
Government and Indian tribes. River, Pittsburgh, PA. SIP meets the infrastructure
(a) Location. The following area is a requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA)
12. Energy Effects
safety zone: All waters of the for the National Ambient Air Quality
This action is not a ‘‘significant Monongahela River, mile 68.0 to 68.8, Standards (NAAQS) promulgated for
energy action’’ under Executive Order extending the entire width of the fine particulate matter (PM2.5) on July
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations waterway. 18, 1997, October 17, 2006, and
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, (b) Effective date. This rule is December 14, 2012 (collectively, the
Distribution, or Use. effective, and will be enforced, from PM2.5 NAAQS). The CAA requires that
9:15 p.m. until 10:30 p.m. on June 12, each state, after a new or revised
13. Technical Standards
2015 and June 13, 2015. NAAQS is promulgated, review its SIP
This rule does not use technical (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with to ensure that it meets the infrastructure
standards. Therefore, we did not the general regulations in § 165.23 of requirements necessary to implement
consider the use of voluntary consensus this part, entry into this zone is the new or revised NAAQS. On
standards. prohibited unless authorized by the September 22, 2014, Washington made
Captain of the Port Pittsburgh or a a SIP submission to establish that the
14. Environment
designated representative. Washington SIP meets the infrastructure
We have analyzed this rule under (2) Persons or vessels requiring entry requirements of the CAA for the PM2.5
Department of Homeland Security into or passage through the zone must NAAQS, except for certain elements
Management Directive 023–01 and request permission from the Captain of related to the Prevention of Significant
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, the Port Pittsburgh or a designated Deterioration (PSD) permitting program
which guide the Coast Guard in representative. The Captain of the currently addressed under a Federal
complying with the National Pittsburgh representative may be Implementation Plan (FIP), certain
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 contacted at 412–221–0807. elements of the regional haze program
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and (3) All persons and vessels shall currently addressed under a FIP, and
have determined that this action is one comply with the instructions of the specific requirements related to
of a category of actions that do not Captain of the Port Pittsburgh or their interstate transport which the State will
individually or cumulatively have a designated representative. Designated address in a separate submittal. The
significant effect on the human Captain of the Port representatives EPA has determined that Washington’s
environment. This rule establishes a include United States Coast Guard SIP is adequate for purposes of the
safety zone for waters of the commissioned, warrant, and petty infrastructure SIP requirements of the
Monongahela River, from mile 68.0 to officers. CAA for the PM2.5 NAAQS, with the
68.8. This rule is categorically excluded (d) Information broadcasts. The exceptions noted above. The SIP
from further review under paragraph Captain of the Port Pittsburgh or a deficiencies related to PSD permitting
34(g) of figure 2–1 of the Commandant designated representative will inform and regional haze, however, have
Instruction an environmental analysis the public through broadcast notices to already been adequately addressed by
checklist supporting this determination mariners of the enforcement period for the existing EPA FIPs and, therefore, no
and a Categorical Exclusion the safety zone as well as any changes further action is required by Washington
Determination are available in the in the planned schedule. or the EPA for those elements. The EPA
docket where indicated under will address the remaining interstate
Dated: April 27, 2015.
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or transport requirements in a separate
information that may lead to the L.N. Weaver, action.
discovery of a significant environmental Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port Pittsburgh. DATES: This final rule is effective June
impact from this rule. 11, 2015.
[FR Doc. 2015–11442 Filed 5–11–15; 8:45 am]
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
docket for this action under Docket ID
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
No. EPA–R10–OAR–2014–0744. All
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
documents in the docket are listed on
requirements, Security measures, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Waterways. AGENCY
Although listed in the index, some
For the reasons discussed in the information is not publicly available,
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 40 CFR Part 52
e.g., Confidential Business Information
CFR part 165 as follows: [EPA–R10–OAR–2014–0744; FRL–9927–45– (CBI) or other information the disclosure
Region 10] of which is restricted by statute. Certain
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION other material, such as copyrighted
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS Approval and Promulgation of
material, is not placed on the Internet
Implementation Plans; Washington:
■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 and will be publicly available only in
Infrastructure Requirements for the
continues to read as follows: hard copy form. Publicly available
Fine Particulate Matter National
docket materials are available either
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; Ambient Air Quality Standards
electronically through
33 CFR 1.05–1; 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
AGENCY: Environmental Protection www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1. Agency (EPA). the Air Programs Unit, Office of Air
ACTION: Final rule. Waste and Toxics, EPA Region 10, 1200
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101. The
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection EPA requests that if at all possible, you
Agency (EPA) is partially approving and contact the individual listed in the FOR
■ 2. Temporary § 165.T08–0284 is partially disapproving the State FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
added to read as follows: Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal view the hard copy of the docket. You

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:43 May 11, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM 12MYR1

Document Created: 2015-12-16 07:55:45
Document Modified: 2015-12-16 07:55:45

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective from 9:15 p.m. until 10:30 p.m. on June 12, 2015 and June 13, 2015.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Jennifer Haggins, Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh, U.S. Coast Guard, at telephone 412-221-0807, email [email protected] If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl F. Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
FR Citation		80 FR 27100
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

80 FR 27100 - Safety Zone; Monongahela River Mile 68.0-68.8; Rices Landing, PA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 91 (May 12, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard