80_FR_29118 80 FR 29021 - Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision for the West Eugene Wetlands in Oregon and Approved Resource Management Plan

80 FR 29021 - Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision for the West Eugene Wetlands in Oregon and Approved Resource Management Plan

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 97 (May 20, 2015)

Page Range29021-29022
FR Document2015-12187

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announces the availability of the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Approved Resource Management Plan (RMP) for the West Eugene Wetlands planning area located in western Oregon. The Oregon/Washington State Director signed the ROD on April 17, 2015, which constitutes the final decision of the BLM and makes the Approved RMP effective immediately.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 97 (Wednesday, May 20, 2015) 
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 97 (Wednesday, May 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29021-29022]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12187]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLORE00000.L63500000.DR0000.LXSS021H0000.15XL1116AF HAG 15-0077]


Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision for the West 
Eugene Wetlands in Oregon and Approved Resource Management Plan

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announces the availability 
of the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Approved Resource Management 
Plan (RMP) for the West Eugene Wetlands planning area located in 
western Oregon. The Oregon/Washington State Director signed the ROD on 
April 17, 2015, which constitutes the final decision of the BLM and 
makes the Approved RMP effective immediately.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the ROD/Approved RMP are available upon request 
from the Eugene District Manager, Bureau of Land Management, 3106 
Pierce Parkway, Suite E, Springfield, OR 97477, or via the internet at: 
http://www.blm.gov/or/districts/eugene/plans/eugenermp.php. Copies of 
the ROD/Approved RMP are available for public inspection at the above-
listed address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panchita Paulete, Planning and 
Environmental Coordinator, telephone 541-683-6976; address 3106 Pierce 
Parkway, Suite E; Springfield, OR 97477; email BLM_OR_EU_Mail@blm.gov. 
Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call 
the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to 
contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is 
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question 
with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal 
business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Interaction with the public regarding this 
RMP began in 2011. The BLM worked with three cooperating agencies: the 
US Army Corps of Engineers, the City of Eugene Parks and Open Space 
Division, and The Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde. The RMP 
establishes direction for approximately 1,340 acres of BLM-administered 
lands in and near the city of Eugene in Lane County, Oregon; the 
planning area did not previously have an RMP. The planning area is made 
up of acquired lands and survey hiatuses. The Approved RMP describes 
the actions that will meet desired resource conditions for threatened 
and endangered species and habitat management, while providing other 
benefits. The Preferred Alternative, described in the October 2011 
Draft RMP/Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), was modified to 
increase acreage within the Prairie Restoration Area land use 
allocation for threatened and endangered species management, to provide 
increased opportunities for recreation, and to provide for coordinated 
management in traditional use plant collection and was carried forward 
as the Proposed RMP in the Final EIS (November 2014). No protests were 
received on the Proposed RMP/Final EIS.
    The Governor of Oregon was provided a formal, 60-day review period 
to determine if the Proposed RMP/Final EIS was consistent with existing 
state or local plans, programs, and policies. No inconsistencies were 
identified.
    There are two implementation decisions in the Approved RMP which 
are appealable under 43 CFR part 4: (a) designation of travel 
management networks, including identifying the specific roads and 
trails that are available for public use and the limitations on use of 
roads and trails and (b) continued application of the

[[Page 29022]]

Final Supplementary Rules for Public Land within the West Eugene 
Wetlands, Eugene District, Oregon, published in the Federal Register on 
July 28, 2005, and adoption of the application of these rules 
throughout the planning area on BLM-managed lands. Any party adversely 
affected may appeal within 30 days of publication of this Notice of 
Availability. The appeal should state the specific decision(s) being 
appealed. The appeal must be filed with the Eugene District Manager at 
the above-listed address.
    Please consult the appropriate regulations (43 CFR, part 4, subpart 
E) for further appeal requirements.

    Authority:  40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10, 43 CFR 1610.2.

Kathryn Stangl,
Eugene District Manager.
[FR Doc. 2015-12187 Filed 5-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Notices 29021 Overview of the Draft Phase IV ERP/EA Invitation to Comment available for public inspection at the The Draft Phase IV ERP/EA is being The Trustees seek public review and above-listed address. released in accordance with the Oil comment on the 10 proposed early FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pollution Act (OPA), the Natural restoration project and supporting Panchita Paulete, Planning and Resources Damage Assessment (NRDA) analysis included in the Draft Phase IV Environmental Coordinator, telephone regulations found in the Code of Federal ERP/EA. Before including your address, 541–683–6976; address 3106 Pierce Regulations (CFR) at 15 CFR 990, the phone number, email address, or other Parkway, Suite E; Springfield, OR National Environmental Policy Act (42 personal identifying information in your 97477; email BLM_OR_EU_Mail@ U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), and the Framework comment, you should be aware that blm.gov. Persons who use a for Early Restoration Addressing your entire comment, including your telecommunications device for the deaf Injuries Resulting from the Deepwater personal identifying information, may (TDD) may call the Federal Information Horizon Oil Spill. be made publicly available at any time. Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 The Trustees are considering 10 to contact the above individual during Administrative Record normal business hours. The FIRS is projects in the Draft Phase IV ERP/EA. The total estimated cost for proposed The documents comprising the available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, Phase IV projects is approximately $134 Administrative Record can be viewed to leave a message or question with the million. Details on the proposed electronically at the following location: above individual. You will receive a projects are provided in the Draft Phase http://www.doi.gov/deepwaterhorizon. reply during normal business hours. IV ERP/EA. The Draft Phase IV ERP/EA SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority also includes a notice of change and Interaction with the public regarding supporting analysis for one Phase III The authority of this action is the Oil this RMP began in 2011. The BLM Early Restoration Project, Pollution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2701 et worked with three cooperating agencies: ‘‘Enhancement of Franklin County Parks seq.) and the implementing Natural the US Army Corps of Engineers, the and Boat Ramps—Eastpoint Fishing Pier Resource Damage Assessment City of Eugene Parks and Open Space Improvements.’’ regulations found at 15 CFR 990. Division, and The Confederated Tribes The proposed restoration projects are Cynthia K. Dohner, of the Grand Ronde. The RMP intended to continue the process of establishes direction for approximately DOI Authorized Official. using early restoration funding to 1,340 acres of BLM-administered lands [FR Doc. 2015–11945 Filed 5–19–15; 8:45 am] restore natural resources, ecological in and near the city of Eugene in Lane BILLING CODE 4310–55–P County, Oregon; the planning area did services, and recreational use services injured or lost as a result of the not previously have an RMP. The Deepwater Horizon oil spill. The planning area is made up of acquired DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Trustees considered hundreds of lands and survey hiatuses. The projects leading to the identification of Bureau of Land Management Approved RMP describes the actions these 10 projects and considered both that will meet desired resource ecological and recreational use conditions for threatened and [LLORE00000.L63500000.DR0000. restoration projects to restore injuries LXSS021H0000.15XL1116AF HAG 15–0077] endangered species and habitat caused by the Deepwater Horizon oil management, while providing other spill, addressing both the physical and Notice of Availability of the Record of benefits. The Preferred Alternative, biological environment, as well as the Decision for the West Eugene described in the October 2011 Draft relationship people have with the Wetlands in Oregon and Approved RMP/Draft Environmental Impact environment. Resource Management Plan Statement (EIS), was modified to Early restoration actions are not increase acreage within the Prairie intended to provide the full extent of AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Restoration Area land use allocation for restoration needed to make the public Interior. threatened and endangered species and the environment whole. The ACTION: Notice of availability. management, to provide increased Trustees anticipate that additional early opportunities for recreation, and to restoration projects will be proposed in SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land provide for coordinated management in the future as the early restoration Management (BLM) announces the traditional use plant collection and was process continues. availability of the Record of Decision carried forward as the Proposed RMP in (ROD) for the Approved Resource the Final EIS (November 2014). No Next Steps Management Plan (RMP) for the West protests were received on the Proposed As described above, public meetings Eugene Wetlands planning area located RMP/Final EIS. are scheduled to facilitate the public in western Oregon. The Oregon/ The Governor of Oregon was provided review and comment process. After the Washington State Director signed the a formal, 60-day review period to public comment period ends, the ROD on April 17, 2015, which determine if the Proposed RMP/Final Trustees will consider and address the constitutes the final decision of the BLM EIS was consistent with existing state or comments received before issuing a and makes the Approved RMP effective local plans, programs, and policies. No Final Phase IV Early Restoration Plan immediately. inconsistencies were identified. and Environmental Assessments (Final ADDRESSES: Copies of the ROD/ There are two implementation mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Phase IV ERP/EA). After issuing a Final Approved RMP are available upon decisions in the Approved RMP which Phase IV ERP/EA, the Trustees will file request from the Eugene District are appealable under 43 CFR part 4: (a) negotiated stipulations for approved Manager, Bureau of Land Management, designation of travel management projects with the court. Approved 3106 Pierce Parkway, Suite E, networks, including identifying the projects will then proceed to Springfield, OR 97477, or via the specific roads and trails that are implementation, pending compliance internet at: http://www.blm.gov/or/ available for public use and the with all applicable State and Federal districts/eugene/plans/eugenermp.php. limitations on use of roads and trails laws. Copies of the ROD/Approved RMP are and (b) continued application of the VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:50 May 19, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM 20MYN1

29022 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Notices Final Supplementary Rules for Public This plat, in 3 sheets, representing the filled controlled substance prescriptions Land within the West Eugene Wetlands, dependent resurvey of a portion of the to a patient’s prescribing physician Eugene District, Oregon, published in south and west boundaries, a survey of rather than directly to the patient, the Federal Register on July 28, 2005, a portion of the subdivisional lines and violates federal law. See generally R.D.; and adoption of the application of these metes-and-bounds surveys of certain see also Mot. for Summ. Disp., at 5–6. rules throughout the planning area on boundary lines in sections 28, 29, 30 The Government takes exception to the BLM-managed lands. Any party and 31, Township 13 North, Range 27 ALJ’s failure to address the issue,1 adversely affected may appeal within 30 East, Mount Diablo Meridian, under arguing that the ALJ ‘‘should have also days of publication of this Notice of Group No. 941, was accepted May 14, reached the merits of this case and Availability. The appeal should state the 2015. This survey was executed at the granted summary disposition to the specific decision(s) being appealed. The request of the Bureau of Land Government on the additional basis that appeal must be filed with the Eugene Management, Carson City District Respondent intends to dispense District Manager at the above-listed Office, Nevada, to facilitate the controlled substances to non-ultimate address. conveyance of certain public lands to users in violation of the [CSA] and its Please consult the appropriate the Municipality of Yerington, Nevada, implementing regulations.’’ Gov. regulations (43 CFR, part 4, subpart E) as authorized in the National Defense Exceptions, at 1. for further appeal requirements. Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2015 As support for its contention, the (Pub. L. 113–291). Government argues that I should reach Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10, 43 CFR 1610.2. The survey listed above is now the the issue because it ‘‘was fully briefed basic record for describing the lands for by the parties,’’ ‘‘there is no dispute as Kathryn Stangl, all authorized purposes. These records to any material fact,’’ and ‘‘the issue is Eugene District Manager. have been placed in the open files in the likely to recur with the Respondent’’ [FR Doc. 2015–12187 Filed 5–19–15; 8:45 am] BLM Nevada State Office and are because its ‘‘owner has stated his intent BILLING CODE 4310–33–P available to the public as a matter of to reapply for a state license and pursue information. Copies of the survey and opening the pharmacy.’’ Id. at 2. Finally, related field notes may be furnished to the Government argues that ‘‘requiring DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR the public upon payment of the the parties to revisit this issue as part of appropriate fees. a future case would be a waste of Bureau of Land Management resources, given that this issue has been Dated: May 14, 2015. [LLNV952000 briefed and is now ripe for disposition.’’ Michael O. Harmening, Id. L14400000.BJ0000.LXSSF2210000.241A; 13–08807; MO #4500079470; TAS: 15X1109] Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Nevada. While Respondent agrees with the [FR Doc. 2015–12217 Filed 5–19–15; 8:45 am] Government,2 I reject the parties’ Filing of Plats of Survey; NV BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P 1 Following the issuance of the Recommended AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Decision, Respondent’s counsel filed a pleading Interior. entitled: ‘‘Notice of Appeal.’’ Therein, Respondent DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE requests that the record be prepared and forwarded ACTION: Notice. ‘‘to the appropriate Appeals Court.’’ Notice of SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is Drug Enforcement Administration Appeal, at 1. Respondent did not, however, file exceptions to the ALJ’s decision as provided for in to inform the public and interested State [Docket No. 14–25] the Agency’s regulations. See 21 CFR 1316.66. As and local government officials of the for its ‘‘Notice of Appeal,’’ the ALJ’s Recommended filing of Plats of Survey in Nevada. The Main Pharmacy; Decision and Decision is not a final decision of the Agency and thus, the filing of the record in ‘‘the appropriate’’ DATES: Effective Dates: Unless otherwise Order court, whatever that maybe, is premature. In the stated filing is effective at 10:00 a.m. on On October 7, 2014, Administrative event Respondent files a Petition for Review of this the dates indicated below. Decision and Order, which is the final decision of Law Judge (ALJ) Christopher B. McNeil the Agency, the Agency will comply with Rule 17 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: issued the attached Recommended of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Michael O. Harmening, Chief, Branch of Decision (hereinafter, R.D.). Therein, the 2 Respondent asserts that the issue of its proposed Geographic Sciences, Bureau of Land ALJ found it undisputed that business model is ripe for review because ‘‘[e]very Management, Nevada State Office, 1340 time [it] applies for a State license all [the Respondent no longer holds a Texas Government] has to do is to sit on the application Financial Blvd., Reno, NV 89502–7147, Pharmacy License and is thus not for a period of six months or more and Respondent phone: 775–861–6490. Persons who use authorized to dispense controlled will have to close [the] Pharmacy. [The a telecommunications device for the substances in the State in which it seeks Government] can then assert that Respondent has deaf (TDD) may call the Federal no State license and should be barred from going registration under the Controlled forward and hence evade review.’’ Resp. Answer to Information Relay Service (FIRS) at Substances Act (CSA). R.D. at 6. The Movant’s Mot. for Summ. Disp., at 3. 1–800–877–8339 to contact the above ALJ thus concluded that Respondent is Respondent’s position apparently stems from the individual during normal business not a ‘‘practitioner’’ within the meaning Texas Pharmacy Act and a regulation of the Texas hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a Board of Pharmacy which authorize disciplinary of the CSA and is therefore not entitled action against the holder of a pharmacy license if day, 7 days a week, to leave a message to be registered. R.D. at 7 (citing 21 the Board finds that the holder has ‘‘failed to engage or question with the above individual. U.S.C. 802(21) & 823(f)). Accordingly, in or ceased to engage in the business described in You will receive a reply during normal the ALJ granted the Government’s the application for a license.’’ Tex. Occ. Code business hours. § 565.002(7); see also 22 Tex. Admin. Code mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Motion for Summary Disposition and § 291.11(a)(1) (‘‘ ‘Failure to engage in the business SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: recommended that I deny its described in the application for a license’ means the 1. The Plat of Survey of the following application. holder of a pharmacy license has not commenced described lands will be officially filed at The ALJ did not, however, address the operating the pharmacy within six months of the the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Government’s further contention that it date of issuance of the license.’’). However, Respondent does not explain why it Nevada State Office, Reno, Nevada on was also entitled to summary could not have opened for business and dispensed the first business day after thirty (30) disposition because Respondent’s non-controlled drugs while it challenged the denial days from the publication of this notice: proposed business model of shipping of its application. VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:50 May 19, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM 20MYN1


Document Created: 2018-02-21 10:29:28
Document Modified: 2018-02-21 10:29:28
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice of availability.
ContactPanchita Paulete, Planning and
FR Citation80 FR 29021 
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR