80 FR 29106 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Schedule of Fees To Introduce a New “Retail” Designation for Priority Customer Orders
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 97 (May 20, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 97 (May 20, 2015)
| Page Range | 29106-29108 | |
| FR Document | 2015-12149 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 97 (Wednesday, May 20, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 29106-29108] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-12149] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-74970; File No. SR-ISE-2015-14] Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Schedule of Fees To Introduce a New ``Retail'' Designation for Priority Customer Orders May 14, 2015. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that on April 29, 2015, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (the ``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the proposed rule change, as described in Items I, II, and III below, which items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The ISE proposes to amend the Schedule of Fees to introduce a new ``Retail'' designation for Priority Customer orders. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.ise.com), at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend the Schedule of Fees to introduce a new ``Retail'' designation for Priority Customer orders. A ``Priority Customer'' is a person or entity that is not a broker/dealer in securities, and does not place more than 390 orders in listed options per day on average during a calendar month for its own beneficial account(s), as defined in Rule 100(a)(37A). This market participant type is one of six currently recognized for purposes of determining applicable fees and rebates, along with: Market Maker,\3\ Non-ISE Market Maker,\4\ Firm Proprietary,\5\ Broker-Dealer,\6\ and Professional Customer.\7\ The Priority Customer designation was adopted by the Exchange to provide competitive pricing and market structure advantages to retail investors, and to level the playing field between retail investors and market professionals. As such, Priority Customer orders executed on the Exchange are generally afforded more favorable fees and rebates than other market participants, including Professional Customers. The Exchange now believes that it is appropriate to introduce a further distinction between [[Page 29107]] market participants that fall within the definition of Priority Customer. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ The term ``Market Makers'' refers to ``Competitive Market Makers'' and ``Primary Market Makers'' collectively. See Rule 100(a)(25). \4\ A ``Non-ISE Market Maker'' is a market maker as defined in Section 3(a)(38) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, registered in the same options class on another options exchange. See Schedule of Fees, Preface. \5\ A ``Firm Proprietary'' order is an order submitted by a member for its own proprietary account. See Schedule of Fees, Preface. \6\ A ``Broker-Dealer'' order is an order submitted by a member for a broker-dealer account that is not its own proprietary account. See Schedule of Fees, Preface. \7\ A ``Professional Customer'' is a person or entity that is not a broker/dealer and is not a Priority Customer. See Schedule of Fees, Preface. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In particular, the Exchange proposes to introduce a new ``Retail'' designation for Priority Customer orders for the purpose of determining applicable fees and rebates. As proposed, a Retail order is a Priority Customer order that originates from a natural person, provided that no change is made to the terms of the order with respect to price or side of market and the order does not originate from a trading algorithm or any other computerized methodology. The proposed definition of a Retail order is designed to mirror a similar concept introduced by the New York Stock Exchange (``NYSE''), NYSE Amex (``Amex''), and other equities exchanges to promote price improvement for orders submitted by retail investors.\8\ The proposed rule change, however, is intended to provide benefits to retail options investors in the form of more favorable pricing rather than market structure changes.\9\ While the Exchange is not amending fees and rebates applicable to Priority Customer orders that are designated Retail at this time, the Exchange intends to introduce special fees and rebates for Retail orders at a later date, such that Retail orders will potentially be entitled to the most favorable fees and rebates available on the Exchange. Until such time, Retail orders will be charged the same fees and provided the same rebates as other Priority Customer orders. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67347 (July 3, 2012), 77 FR 40673 (July 10, 2012) (SR-NYSE-2011-55; SR-NYSEAmex- 2011-84) (Approval Order). See also NYSE and Amex Rule 107C(a)(3). NYSE and Amex define a ``Retail Order'' as an agency order or a riskless principal order that meets the criteria of FINRA Rule 5320.03 that originates from a natural person and is submitted to the Exchange by a Retail Member Organization, provided that no change is made to the terms of the order with respect to price or side of market and the order does not originate from a trading algorithm or any other computerized methodology. \9\ In addition, the Exchange notes that unlike the related equities programs, all members will be eligible to mark orders as Retail provided that the orders meet the requirements discussed above. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\10\ In particular, the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\11\ because is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Specifically, the proposed rule change will allow the Exchange to potentially offer more favorable fees and rebates to Retail orders that originate from natural persons. Currently, the Exchange distinguishes between orders executed for two categories of Public Customer: \12\ Priority and Professional Customers. Priority Customers are distinguished from Professional Customers by the requirement that they not place more than 390 orders in listed options per day on average during a calendar month for its own beneficial account(s). Because of this limitation, Priority Customer orders are generally afforded more favorable fees and rebates than market professionals, including Professional Customers. The Exchange now believes that it is appropriate to distinguish further between orders that originate from a natural person (i.e., Retail orders) and other Priority Customer orders. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ A ``Public Customer'' is a person or entity that is not a broker or dealer in securities. See Rule 100(a)(38). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The equities markets already provide benefits to order flow that originates from a natural person and not a trading algorithm or any other computerized methodology. The Exchange believes that the proposed definition of a Retail order is appropriate as it is substantially similar to the definition already used in the equities context, and is therefore already familiar to market participants. The Exchange notes, however, that unlike equities exchanges such as NYSE and Amex, it is not proposing any market structure changes at this time to accompany the introduction of a Retail designation for Priority Customer orders. All Priority Customer orders will continue to benefit from the current market structure benefits that they receive on the Exchange. In addition, Priority Customer orders other than Retail orders will continue to benefit from pricing that is generally more favorable than pricing adopted for Professional Customer and non-Customer orders. By adopting a definition of Retail order, the Exchange hopes to be able to offer potentially more favorable fees and rebates to retail investors. The Exchange believes that this will advance the goals identified when the Exchange first introduced the Priority Customer designation, by providing genuine retail investors with the best prices available on the Exchange. In this regard, the Exchange notes that the fees and rebates for Retail orders will initially be the same as fees and rebates for other Priority Customer orders; however, the Exchange will introduce additional pricing advantages for Retail orders at a later date pursuant to a proposed rule change filed with the Commission. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\13\ the Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on intermarket or intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. To the contrary, the Exchange believes the proposed Retail designation is an innovative change that evidences strong competition between options markets. In particular, the proposed rule change is designed to allow the Exchange to potentially offer the most favorable fees and rebates available to Retail orders that originate from natural persons. The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily direct their order flow to competing venues. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually review, and consider adjusting, its fees and rebates to remain competitive with other exchanges. For the reasons described above, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes reflect this competitive environment. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit, comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested parties. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The Exchange believes that the foregoing proposed rule change may take effect upon filing with the Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) \14\ of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder \15\ because the foregoing proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest, (ii) impose any significant burden on competition, and (iii) become operative for 30 days after its filing date, or such [[Page 29108]] shorter time as the Commission may designate. The Exchange provided the Commission with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing the proposed rule change. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an Email to [email protected]. Please include File No. SR-ISE-2015-14 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-ISE-2015-14. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule changes between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the ISE. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-ISE-2015-14 and should be submitted on or before June 10, 2015. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\16\ Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015-12149 Filed 5-19-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![29106 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Notices
• Fax: (202) 456–6027, Attn: advantage of harnessing the II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Elizabeth Stulberg. microbiome’s potential? Statement of the Purpose of, and
• Mail: Attn: Elizabeth Stulberg, • What fields of microbiome research Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Office of Science and Technology are currently underfunded or Change
Policy, Eisenhower Executive Office underrepresented? In its filing with the Commission, the
Building, 1650 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., • What specific steps could be taken self-regulatory organization included
Washington, DC 20504. by the federal government, research statements concerning the purpose of,
Instructions: Electronic responses institutes, universities, and and basis for, the proposed rule change
must be provided as attachments to an philanthropies to encourage multi- and discussed any comments it received
email. It is recommended that disciplinary microbiome research? on the proposed rule change. The text
attachments with file sizes exceeding • Is there any additional information, of these statements may be examined at
25MB be compressed (i.e., zipped) to not requested above, that you believe the places specified in Item IV below.
ensure message delivery. Please identify OSTP should consider in identifying The self-regulatory organization has
your answers by responding to a crucial areas of microbiome research? prepared summaries, set forth in
specific question or topic if possible. sections A, B and C below, of the most
Ted Wackler,
Respondents may answer as many or as significant aspects of such statements.
few questions as they wish. Comments Deputy Chief of Staff and Assistant Director.
of up to two pages or fewer (1,000 [FR Doc. 2015–12191 Filed 5–19–15; 8:45 am] A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
words) are requested; longer responses BILLING CODE 3270–F5–P Statement of the Purpose of, and
will not be considered. Any information Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
obtained as a result of this RFI is Change
intended to be used by the Government 1. Purpose
on a non-attribution basis for planning SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION The Exchange proposes to amend the
and strategy development. OSTP will
Schedule of Fees to introduce a new
not respond to individual submissions.
‘‘Retail’’ designation for Priority
A response to this RFI will not be [Release No. 34–74970; File No. SR–ISE–
2015–14]
Customer orders. A ‘‘Priority Customer’’
viewed as a binding commitment to
is a person or entity that is not a broker/
develop or pursue the project or ideas dealer in securities, and does not place
discussed. OSTP will not pay for Self-Regulatory Organizations;
International Securities Exchange, more than 390 orders in listed options
information provided under this RFI. per day on average during a calendar
This RFI is not accepting applications LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule month for its own beneficial account(s),
for financial assistance or financial as defined in Rule 100(a)(37A). This
incentives. OSTP requests that no Change To Amend the Schedule of
Fees To Introduce a New ‘‘Retail’’ market participant type is one of six
proprietary information, copyrighted currently recognized for purposes of
information, or personally identifiable Designation for Priority Customer
Orders determining applicable fees and rebates,
information be submitted in response to along with: Market Maker,3 Non-ISE
this RFI. May 14, 2015. Market Maker,4 Firm Proprietary,5
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Broker-Dealer,6 and Professional
Elizabeth Stulberg at MicrobiomeRFI@ Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Customer.7 The Priority Customer
ostp.eop.gov, (202) 456–4444. ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 designation was adopted by the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice is hereby given that on April 29, Exchange to provide competitive pricing
purpose of this RFI is to solicit feedback 2015, the International Securities and market structure advantages to
from industry, academia, research Exchange, LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or the retail investors, and to level the playing
laboratories, and other stakeholder ‘‘ISE’’) filed with the Securities and field between retail investors and
groups on both the overarching Exchange Commission the proposed market professionals. As such, Priority
questions that unite all microbiome rule change, as described in Items I, II, Customer orders executed on the
research and the tools, technologies, and and III below, which items have been Exchange are generally afforded more
training that are needed to answer these prepared by the self-regulatory favorable fees and rebates than other
questions. OSTP is specifically organization. The Commission is market participants, including
interested in information that publishing this notice to solicit Professional Customers. The Exchange
corresponds to the mission statements comments on the proposed rule change now believes that it is appropriate to
of multiple Federal agencies, private from interested persons. introduce a further distinction between
sector interests, and current White
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
House Policy Initiatives. In particular, 3 The term ‘‘Market Makers’’ refers to
Statement of the Terms of Substance of ‘‘Competitive Market Makers’’ and ‘‘Primary Market
respondents may wish to address the
the Proposed Rule Change Makers’’ collectively. See Rule 100(a)(25).
following topics: 4 A ‘‘Non-ISE Market Maker’’ is a market maker
• What are the most pressing, The ISE proposes to amend the as defined in Section 3(a)(38) of the Securities
fundamental questions in microbiome Schedule of Fees to introduce a new Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, registered in the
research, common to most or all fields? ‘‘Retail’’ designation for Priority same options class on another options exchange.
• Over the next ten years, what are Customer orders. The text of the See Schedule of Fees, Preface.
5 A ‘‘Firm Proprietary’’ order is an order
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the most important research gaps that proposed rule change is available on the submitted by a member for its own proprietary
must be addressed to advance this field? Exchange’s Web site (http:// account. See Schedule of Fees, Preface.
• What tools, platform technologies, www.ise.com), at the principal office of 6 A ‘‘Broker-Dealer’’ order is an order submitted
or technological advances would propel the Exchange, and at the Commission’s by a member for a broker-dealer account that is not
microbiome research from correlative to Public Reference Room. its own proprietary account. See Schedule of Fees,
Preface.
predictive? 7 A ‘‘Professional Customer’’ is a person or entity
• What crucial types of scientific and 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). that is not a broker/dealer and is not a Priority
technical training will be needed to take 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. Customer. See Schedule of Fees, Preface.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:50 May 19, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00178 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM 20MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_29203/page/1.svg)
![29108 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Notices
shorter time as the Commission may business days between the hours of added, deleted or postponed, please
designate. The Exchange provided the 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the contact the Office of the Secretary at
Commission with written notice of its filing also will be available for (202) 551–5400.
intent to file the proposed rule change, inspection and copying at the principal Dated: May 18, 2015.
along with a brief description and text office of the ISE. All comments received Jill M. Peterson,
of the proposed rule change, at least five will be posted without change; the
Assistant Secretary.
business days prior to the date of filing Commission does not edit personal
the proposed rule change. [FR Doc. 2015–12380 Filed 5–18–15; 4:15 pm]
identifying information from
At any time within 60 days of the submissions. You should submit only BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
filing of the proposed rule change, the information that you wish to make
Commission summarily may available publicly. All submissions
temporarily suspend such rule change if SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
should refer to File No. SR–ISE–2015–
it appears to the Commission that such COMMISSION
14 and should be submitted on or before
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in June 10, 2015. Submission for OMB Review;
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
For the Commission, by the Division of Comment Request
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. authority.16 Upon Written Request, Copies Available
If the Commission takes such action, the Robert W. Errett, From: Securities and Exchange
Commission shall institute proceedings Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
Deputy Secretary.
to determine whether the proposed rule 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
[FR Doc. 2015–12149 Filed 5–19–15; 8:45 am]
should be approved or disapproved. 20549–2736.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
IV. Solicitation of Comments Extension:
Rule 17a–6; SEC File No. 270–433, OMB
Interested persons are invited to Control No. 3235–0489.
submit written data, views, and SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
arguments concerning the foregoing, COMMISSION Notice is hereby given that pursuant
including whether the proposal is to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
consistent with the Act. Comments may Sunshine Act Meeting (‘‘PRA’’) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the
be submitted by any of the following Notice is hereby given, pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission
methods: the provisions of the Government in the (‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Sunshine Act, Public Law 94–409, that Office of Management and Budget
Electronic Comments (‘‘OMB’’) a request for extension of the
the Securities and Exchange
• Use the Commission’s Internet Commission will hold a Closed Meeting previously approved collection of
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ on Tuesday, May 19, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. information provided for in Rule 17a–6
rules/sro.shtml); or Commissioners, Counsel to the (17 CFR 240.17a–6) under the Securities
• Send an Email to rule-comments@ Commissioners, the Secretary to the Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et
sec.gov. Please include File No. SR–ISE– Commission, and recording secretaries seq.).
2015–14 on the subject line. will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain Rule 17a–6 permits national securities
staff members who have an interest in exchanges, national securities
Paper Comments
the matters also may be present. associations, registered clearing
• Send paper comments in triplicate agencies, and the Municipal Securities
The General Counsel of the
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Rulemaking Board (‘‘MSRB’’)
Commission, or her designee, has
Commission, 100 F Street NE., (collectively, ‘‘SROs’’) to destroy or
certified that, in her opinion, one or
Washington, DC 20549. convert to microfilm or other recording
more of the exemptions set forth in 5
All submissions should refer to File No. U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) media records maintained under Rule
SR–ISE–2015–14. This file number and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) 17a–1, if they have filed a record
should be included on the subject line and (10), permit consideration of the destruction plan with the Commission
if email is used. To help the scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting. and the Commission has declared such
Commission process and review your Commissioner Stein, as duty officer, plan effective.
comments more efficiently, please use voted to consider the items listed for the There are currently 29 SROs: 18
only one method. The Commission will Closed Meeting in closed session, and national securities exchanges, 1 national
post all comments on the Commission’s determined that Commission business securities association, the MSRB, and 9
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ required consideration earlier than one registered clearing agencies. Of the 29
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the week from today. No earlier notice of SROs, only 2 SRO respondents have
submission, all subsequent this Meeting was practicable. filed a record destruction plan with the
amendments, all written statements The subject matter of the Closed Commission. The staff calculates that
with respect to the proposed rule Meeting will be: the preparation and filing of a new
change that are filed with the Institution of injunctive actions; record destruction plan should take 160
Commission, and all written Institution and settlement of hours. Further, any existing SRO record
communications relating to the administrative proceedings; and destruction plans may require revision,
proposed rule changes between the Other matters relating to enforcement over time, in response to, for example,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Commission and any person, other than proceedings. changes in document retention
those that may be withheld from the At times, changes in Commission technology, which the Commission
public in accordance with the priorities require alterations in the estimates will take much less than the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be scheduling of meeting items. 160 hours estimated for a new plan. The
available for Web site viewing and For further information and to Commission estimates that each SRO
printing in the Commission’s Public ascertain what, if any, matters have been that has filed a destruction plan will
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., spend approximately 30 hours per year
Washington, DC 20549 on official 16 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). making required revisions. Thus, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:50 May 19, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00180 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM 20MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_29203/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-21 10:30:02
Document Modified: 2018-02-21 10:30:02
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 29106 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR