80 FR 29152 - Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 97 (May 20, 2015)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 97 (May 20, 2015)
| Page Range | 29152-29154 | |
| FR Document | 2015-12198 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 97 (Wednesday, May 20, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 29152-29154] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-12198] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration [Docket No. FMCSA-2014-0302] Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of final disposition. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to exempt 27 individuals from the vision requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs). They are unable to meet the vision requirement in one eye for various reasons. The exemptions will enable these individuals to operate commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce without meeting the prescribed vision requirement in one eye. The Agency has concluded that granting these exemptions will provide a level of safety that is equivalent to or greater than the level of safety maintained without the exemptions for these CMV drivers. DATES: The exemptions were granted April 7, 2015. The exemptions expire on April 7, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles A. Horan, III, Director, Carrier, Driver and Vehicle Safety Standards, (202) 366-4001, [email protected], FMCSA, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W64-224, Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact Docket Services, telephone (202) 366- 9826. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Electronic Access You may see all the comments online through the Federal Document Management System (FDMS) at http://www.regulations.gov. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments, go to http://www.regulations.gov and/or Room W12-140 on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy. II. Background On March 6, 2015, FMCSA published a notice of receipt of exemption applications from certain individuals, and requested comments from the public (80 FR 12248). That notice listed 27 applicants' case histories. The 27 individuals applied for exemptions from the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), for drivers who operate CMVs in interstate commerce. Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2-year period if it finds ``such exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to or greater than the level that would be achieved absent such exemption.'' The statute also [[Page 29153]] allows the Agency to renew exemptions at the end of the 2-year period. Accordingly, FMCSA has evaluated the 27 applications on their merits and made a determination to grant exemptions to each of them. III. Vision and Driving Experience of the Applicants The vision requirement in the FMCSRs provides: A person is physically qualified to drive a commercial motor vehicle if that person has distant visual acuity of at least 20/40 (Snellen) in each eye without corrective lenses or visual acuity separately corrected to 20/40 (Snellen) or better with corrective lenses, distant binocular acuity of a least 20/40 (Snellen) in both eyes with or without corrective lenses, field of vision of at least 70[deg] in the horizontal meridian in each eye, and the ability to recognize the colors of traffic signals and devices showing red, green, and amber (49 CFR 391.41(b)(10)). FMCSA recognizes that some drivers do not meet the vision requirement but have adapted their driving to accommodate their vision limitation and demonstrated their ability to drive safely. The 27 exemption applicants listed in this notice are in this category. They are unable to meet the vision requirement in one eye for various reasons, including macular scar, globe laceration, retinal detachment, amblyopia, enucleation, cancerous choroid, Coats' Disease, macular degeneration, alternating esotropia, optic nerve atrophy, esotropia, degenerated optic nerve, refractive amblyopia, retinal scarring, full- thickness macular hole, Behcet's panuveities, primary open angle glaucoma, keratopathy, keratectomy, optic nerve compression, complete loss of vision, and retinal vascular occlusion. In most cases, their eye conditions were not recently developed. Fifteen of the applicants were either born with their vision impairments or have had them since childhood. The twelve individuals that sustained their vision conditions as adults have had it for a range of five to 19 years. Although each applicant has one eye which does not meet the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), each has at least 20/40 corrected vision in the other eye, and in a doctor's opinion, has sufficient vision to perform all the tasks necessary to operate a CMV. Doctors' opinions are supported by the applicants' possession of valid commercial driver's licenses (CDLs) or non-CDLs to operate CMVs. Before issuing CDLs, States subject drivers to knowledge and skills tests designed to evaluate their qualifications to operate a CMV. All of these applicants satisfied the testing requirements for their State of residence. By meeting State licensing requirements, the applicants demonstrated their ability to operate a CMV, with their limited vision, to the satisfaction of the State. While possessing a valid CDL or non-CDL, these 27 drivers have been authorized to drive a CMV in intrastate commerce, even though their vision disqualified them from driving in interstate commerce. They have driven CMVs with their limited vision in careers ranging from four to 50 years. In the past three years, one of drivers was involved in a crash and one was convicted of a moving violation in a CMV. The qualifications, experience, and medical condition of each applicant were stated and discussed in detail in the March 6, 2015 notice (80 FR 12248). IV. Basis for Exemption Determination Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption from the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) if the exemption is likely to achieve an equivalent or greater level of safety than would be achieved without the exemption. Without the exemption, applicants will continue to be restricted to intrastate driving. With the exemption, applicants can drive in interstate commerce. Thus, our analysis focuses on whether an equal or greater level of safety is likely to be achieved by permitting each of these drivers to drive in interstate commerce as opposed to restricting him or her to driving in intrastate commerce. To evaluate the effect of these exemptions on safety, FMCSA considered the medical reports about the applicants' vision as well as their driving records and experience with the vision deficiency. To qualify for an exemption from the vision requirement, FMCSA requires a person to present verifiable evidence that he/she has driven a commercial vehicle safely with the vision deficiency for the past 3 years. Recent driving performance is especially important in evaluating future safety, according to several research studies designed to correlate past and future driving performance. Results of these studies support the principle that the best predictor of future performance by a driver is his/her past record of crashes and traffic violations. Copies of the studies may be found at Docket Number FMCSA-1998-3637. FMCSA believes it can properly apply the principle to monocular drivers, because data from the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) former waiver study program clearly demonstrate the driving performance of experienced monocular drivers in the program is better than that of all CMV drivers collectively (See 61 FR 13338, 13345, March 26, 1996). The fact that experienced monocular drivers demonstrated safe driving records in the waiver program supports a conclusion that other monocular drivers, meeting the same qualifying conditions as those required by the waiver program, are also likely to have adapted to their vision deficiency and will continue to operate safely. The first major research correlating past and future performance was done in England by Greenwood and Yule in 1920. Subsequent studies, building on that model, concluded that crash rates for the same individual exposed to certain risks for two different time periods vary only slightly (See Bates and Neyman, University of California Publications in Statistics, April 1952). Other studies demonstrated theories of predicting crash proneness from crash history coupled with other factors. These factors--such as age, sex, geographic location, mileage driven and conviction history--are used every day by insurance companies and motor vehicle bureaus to predict the probability of an individual experiencing future crashes (See Weber, Donald C., ``Accident Rate Potential: An Application of Multiple Regression Analysis of a Poisson Process,'' Journal of American Statistical Association, June 1971). A 1964 California Driver Record Study prepared by the California Department of Motor Vehicles concluded that the best overall crash predictor for both concurrent and nonconcurrent events is the number of single convictions. This study used 3 consecutive years of data, comparing the experiences of drivers in the first 2 years with their experiences in the final year. Applying principles from these studies to the past 3-year record of the 27 applicants, one driver was involved in a crash, and one was convicted of a moving violation in a CMV. All the applicants achieved a record of safety while driving with their vision impairment, demonstrating the likelihood that they have adapted their driving skills to accommodate their condition. As the applicants' ample driving histories with their vision deficiencies are good predictors of future performance, FMCSA concludes their ability to drive safely can be projected into the future. We believe that the applicants' intrastate driving experience and history [[Page 29154]] provide an adequate basis for predicting their ability to drive safely in interstate commerce. Intrastate driving, like interstate operations, involves substantial driving on highways on the interstate system and on other roads built to interstate standards. Moreover, driving in congested urban areas exposes the driver to more pedestrian and vehicular traffic than exists on interstate highways. Faster reaction to traffic and traffic signals is generally required because distances between them are more compact. These conditions tax visual capacity and driver response just as intensely as interstate driving conditions. The veteran drivers in this proceeding have operated CMVs safely under those conditions for at least 3 years, most for much longer. Their experience and driving records lead us to believe that each applicant is capable of operating in interstate commerce as safely as he/she has been performing in intrastate commerce. Consequently, FMCSA finds that exempting these applicants from the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) is likely to achieve a level of safety equal to that existing without the exemption. For this reason, the Agency is granting the exemptions for the 2-year period allowed by 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 to the 27 applicants listed in the notice of March 6, 2015 (80 FR 12248). We recognize that the vision of an applicant may change and affect his/her ability to operate a CMV as safely as in the past. As a condition of the exemption, therefore, FMCSA will impose requirements on the 27 individuals consistent with the grandfathering provisions applied to drivers who participated in the Agency's vision waiver program. Those requirements are found at 49 CFR 391.64(b) and include the following: (1) That each individual be physically examined every year (a) by an ophthalmologist or optometrist who attests that the vision in the better eye continues to meet the requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) and (b) by a medical examiner who attests that the individual is otherwise physically qualified under 49 CFR 391.41; (2) that each individual provide a copy of the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's report to the medical examiner at the time of the annual medical examination; and (3) that each individual provide a copy of the annual medical certification to the employer for retention in the driver's qualification file, or keep a copy in his/her driver's qualification file if he/she is self-employed. The driver must have a copy of the certification when driving, for presentation to a duly authorized Federal, State, or local enforcement official. V. Discussion of Comments FMCSA received no comments in this proceeding. IV. Conclusion Based upon its evaluation of the 27 exemption applications, FMCSA exempts the following drivers from the vision requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), subject to the requirements cited above (49 CFR 391.64(b)): Joel C. Bailey (FL) Mackfie Bradley, Jr. (NC) Justin C. Bruchman (WI) Bradley J. Compton (ID) Anthony C. Curtis (WA) Douglas S. Dalling (PA) Lloyd A. Dornbusch (PA) Randall R. Drake (CA) Paul E. Emmons (RI) Thomas P. Fitzsimmons Jr. (NC) Steve L. Frisby (CA) Daryl G. Gibson (FL) Mark J. Goodrich (PA) Ramon L. Green (LA) Carl E. Hess (PA) Mark E. Jeans (OK) Chad Kauffman (PA) Scottie W. Lewis (GA) David S. Mayo (VA) Ross E. McCleary (NE) Alex D. McCrady (NH) Stacy L. Michael (OH) Charles A. Morgan (NC) Paul C. Swanson (IL) Terrance W. Temple (OH) Rick A. Tucker (MO) Jason R. White (OH) In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, each exemption will be valid for 2 years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked if: (1) The person fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has resulted in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was granted; or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315. If the exemption is still effective at the end of the 2-year period, the person may apply to FMCSA for a renewal under procedures in effect at that time. Issued on: May 11, 2015. Larry W. Minor, Associate Administrator for Policy. [FR Doc. 2015-12198 Filed 5-19-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
![29152 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Notices
Comments These motor carriers must ensure that the prescribed vision requirement in
FMCSA published a notice of the the DASs are mounted within and/or one eye. The Agency has concluded that
exemption application in the Federal below 3 inches of the bottom of the granting these exemptions will provide
Register on February 18, 2015, and driver side windshield wiper sweep, a level of safety that is equivalent to or
asked for public comment (80 FR 8750). and out of the driver’s sightlines to the greater than the level of safety
No comments were received. road and highway signs and signals as maintained without the exemptions for
much as practicable. these CMV drivers.
FMCSA Decision The exemption is valid for two years DATES: The exemptions were granted
The FMCSA has evaluated the VTTI unless rescinded earlier by FMCSA. The April 7, 2015. The exemptions expire on
exemption application. The Agency exemption will be rescinded if (1) motor April 7, 2017.
believes that granting the temporary carriers and/or commercial motor
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
exemption to allow the placement of the vehicles fail to comply with the terms
Charles A. Horan, III, Director, Carrier,
DASs and necessary mounting brackets and conditions of the exemption; (2) the
Driver and Vehicle Safety Standards,
at the bottom of the windshield, within exemption has resulted in a lower level
of safety than was maintained before it (202) 366–4001, fmcsamedical@dot.gov,
and/or below 3 inches of the bottom of FMCSA, Department of Transportation,
the windshield wiper sweep, will was granted; or (3) continuation of the
exemption would not be consistent with 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
provide a level of safety that is W64–224, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
equivalent to, or greater than the level the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315(b). Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5
of safety achieved without the p.m., Monday through Friday, except
exemption. FMCSA does not believe Interested parties possessing
information that would demonstrate Federal holidays. If you have questions
there will be any degradation in the on viewing or submitting material to the
safety performance of motor carriers that motor carriers using the DASs are
not achieving the requisite statutory docket, contact Docket Services,
utilizing the exemption during the 2- telephone (202) 366–9826.
year exemption period because (1) there level of safety should immediately
notify FMCSA. The Agency will SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
is nothing in available technical
information to indicate that the DASs evaluate any such information and, if I. Electronic Access
would obstruct drivers’ views of the safety is being compromised or if the
continuation of the exemption is not You may see all the comments online
roadway, highway signs and through the Federal Document
surrounding traffic; (2) generally, trucks consistent with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315(b), will take immediate steps to Management System (FDMS) at http://
and buses have an elevated seating www.regulations.gov.
position which greatly improves the revoke the exemption.
Docket: For access to the docket to
forward visual field of the driver, Preemption read background documents or
making any impairment of available comments, go to http://
During the period the exemption is in
sight lines minimal; and (3) the location www.regulations.gov and/or Room
effect, no State shall enforce any law or
three inches or less above the bottom of W12–140 on the ground level of the
regulation that conflicts with or is
the driver’s-side windshield wiper West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
inconsistent with this exemption with
sweep, and out of the driver’s sightline, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m.
respect to a person operating under the
is reasonable and enforceable at and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
exemption.
roadside. Without the exemption, except Federal holidays.
NHTSA would be unable to test this Issued on: May 5, 2015.
Privacy Act: In accordance with 5
innovative onboard safety monitoring T.F. Scott Darling, III,
U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
system. Chief Counsel. from the public to better inform its
[FR Doc. 2015–12199 Filed 5–19–15; 8:45 am] rulemaking process. DOT posts these
Terms and Conditions for the
Exemption BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P comments, without edit, including any
The Agency hereby grants the personal information the commenter
exemption for a two-year period, provides, to www.regulations.gov, as
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION described in the system of records
beginning May 20, 2015 and ending May
20, 2017. During the temporary Federal Motor Carrier Safety notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can
exemption period, up to 150 DASs may Administration be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy.
be installed in CMVs operated by the [Docket No. FMCSA–2014–0302] II. Background
motor carriers listed below. These are
On March 6, 2015, FMCSA published
the same carriers that have operated Qualification of Drivers; Exemption a notice of receipt of exemption
under the waiver: Applications; Vision applications from certain individuals,
1. USDOT #32052 Crosby Trucking
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety and requested comments from the
Service Inc. in Mount Sydney. VA.
2. USDOT #369138 Rush Trucking Administration (FMCSA), DOT. public (80 FR 12248). That notice listed
Corporation in Wayne, MI. ACTION: Notice of final disposition. 27 applicants’ case histories. The 27
3. USDOT #1977980 Kuperus individuals applied for exemptions from
Trucking Inc. in Jenison, MI. SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its the vision requirement in 49 CFR
4. USDOT #282628 Stagecoach decision to exempt 27 individuals from 391.41(b)(10), for drivers who operate
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Cartage and Distribution, LP in El Paso, the vision requirement in the Federal CMVs in interstate commerce.
TX. Motor Carrier Safety Regulations Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
5. USDOT #184405 J & M Tank (FMCSRs). They are unable to meet the FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2-
Lines Inc. in Birmingham, AL. vision requirement in one eye for year period if it finds ‘‘such exemption
6. USDOT #1243338 P&S various reasons. The exemptions will would likely achieve a level of safety
Transportation LLC in Ensley, AL. enable these individuals to operate that is equivalent to or greater than the
7. USDOT #75827 Modular commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in level that would be achieved absent
Transport Company in Wyoming, MI. interstate commerce without meeting such exemption.’’ The statute also
VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:50 May 19, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00224 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM 20MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_29249/page/1.svg)
![29154 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Notices
provide an adequate basis for predicting Federal, State, or local enforcement DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
their ability to drive safely in interstate official.
commerce. Intrastate driving, like Federal Motor Carrier Safety
V. Discussion of Comments Administration
interstate operations, involves
substantial driving on highways on the FMCSA received no comments in this [Docket No. FMCSA–2003–14504; FMCSA–
interstate system and on other roads proceeding. 2005–20560; FMCSA–2007–27515]
built to interstate standards. Moreover,
driving in congested urban areas IV. Conclusion
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
exposes the driver to more pedestrian Based upon its evaluation of the 27 Applications; Vision
and vehicular traffic than exists on exemption applications, FMCSA
interstate highways. Faster reaction to exempts the following drivers from the AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety
traffic and traffic signals is generally vision requirement in 49 CFR Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
required because distances between 391.41(b)(10), subject to the ACTION: Notice of renewal of
them are more compact. These requirements cited above (49 CFR exemptions; request for comments.
conditions tax visual capacity and 391.64(b)):
driver response just as intensely as SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its
interstate driving conditions. The Joel C. Bailey (FL) decision to renew the exemptions from
veteran drivers in this proceeding have Mackfie Bradley, Jr. (NC) the vision requirement in the Federal
operated CMVs safely under those Justin C. Bruchman (WI) Motor Carrier Safety Regulations for 15
conditions for at least 3 years, most for Bradley J. Compton (ID) individuals. FMCSA has statutory
much longer. Their experience and Anthony C. Curtis (WA) authority to exempt individuals from
driving records lead us to believe that the vision requirement if the
Douglas S. Dalling (PA) exemptions granted will not
each applicant is capable of operating in
interstate commerce as safely as he/she Lloyd A. Dornbusch (PA) compromise safety. The Agency has
has been performing in intrastate Randall R. Drake (CA) concluded that granting these
commerce. Consequently, FMCSA finds Paul E. Emmons (RI) exemption renewals will provide a level
that exempting these applicants from Thomas P. Fitzsimmons Jr. (NC) of safety that is equivalent to or greater
the vision requirement in 49 CFR Steve L. Frisby (CA) than the level of safety maintained
391.41(b)(10) is likely to achieve a level without the exemptions for these
Daryl G. Gibson (FL)
of safety equal to that existing without commercial motor vehicle (CMV)
the exemption. For this reason, the Mark J. Goodrich (PA) drivers.
Agency is granting the exemptions for Ramon L. Green (LA)
DATES: This decision is effective June
the 2-year period allowed by 49 U.S.C. Carl E. Hess (PA)
13, 2015. Comments must be received
31136(e) and 31315 to the 27 applicants Mark E. Jeans (OK) on or before June 19, 2015.
listed in the notice of March 6, 2015 (80 Chad Kauffman (PA) ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
FR 12248). Scottie W. Lewis (GA)
We recognize that the vision of an bearing the Federal Docket Management
David S. Mayo (VA) System (FDMS) numbers: Docket No.
applicant may change and affect his/her
ability to operate a CMV as safely as in Ross E. McCleary (NE) [Docket No. FMCSA–2003–14504;
the past. As a condition of the Alex D. McCrady (NH) FMCSA–2005–20560; FMCSA–2007–
exemption, therefore, FMCSA will Stacy L. Michael (OH) 27515], using any of the following
impose requirements on the 27 methods:
Charles A. Morgan (NC)
individuals consistent with the • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
Paul C. Swanson (IL) http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
grandfathering provisions applied to Terrance W. Temple (OH)
drivers who participated in the on-line instructions for submitting
Agency’s vision waiver program. Rick A. Tucker (MO) comments.
Those requirements are found at 49 Jason R. White (OH) • Mail: Docket Management Facility;
CFR 391.64(b) and include the In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
following: (1) That each individual be and 31315, each exemption will be valid New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
physically examined every year (a) by for 2 years unless revoked earlier by Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
an ophthalmologist or optometrist who FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked Washington, DC 20590–0001.
attests that the vision in the better eye if: (1) The person fails to comply with • Hand Delivery or Courier: West
continues to meet the requirement in 49 the terms and conditions of the Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
CFR 391.41(b)(10) and (b) by a medical exemption; (2) the exemption has 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
examiner who attests that the individual resulted in a lower level of safety than Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
is otherwise physically qualified under was maintained before it was granted; or p.m., Monday through Friday, except
49 CFR 391.41; (2) that each individual (3) continuation of the exemption would Federal Holidays.
provide a copy of the ophthalmologist’s not be consistent with the goals and • Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
or optometrist’s report to the medical objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315. Instructions: Each submission must
examiner at the time of the annual If the exemption is still effective at the include the Agency name and the
medical examination; and (3) that each end of the 2-year period, the person may docket number for this notice. Note that
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
individual provide a copy of the annual apply to FMCSA for a renewal under DOT posts all comments received
medical certification to the employer for procedures in effect at that time. without change to http://
retention in the driver’s qualification www.regulations.gov, including any
Issued on: May 11, 2015. personal information included in a
file, or keep a copy in his/her driver’s
qualification file if he/she is self- Larry W. Minor, comment. Please see the Privacy Act
employed. The driver must have a copy Associate Administrator for Policy. heading below.
of the certification when driving, for [FR Doc. 2015–12198 Filed 5–19–15; 8:45 am] Docket: For access to the docket to
presentation to a duly authorized BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P read background documents or
VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:50 May 19, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00226 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM 20MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_29249/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-21 10:29:34
Document Modified: 2018-02-21 10:29:34
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice of final disposition. | |
| Dates | The exemptions were granted April 7, 2015. The exemptions expire on April 7, 2017. | |
| Contact | Charles A. Horan, III, Director, Carrier, Driver and Vehicle Safety Standards, (202) 366-4001, [email protected], FMCSA, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W64-224, Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact Docket Services, telephone (202) 366- 9826. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 29152 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR