80 FR 30186 - Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 101 (May 27, 2015)

Page Range		30186-30187
FR Document		2015-12622

The Department of the Interior is requesting public input on selected regulations as part of its plan to review significant regulations in response to the President's Executive Order on Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 101 (Wednesday, May 27, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 27, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30186-30187]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12622]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary

25 CFR Chapters I, II, III, V, VI, and VII

[156D0102DM DS6CS00000 DLSN00000.000000 DX6CS25]


Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Interior.

ACTION: Request for public input.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Interior is requesting public input on 
selected regulations as part of its plan to review significant 
regulations in response to the President's Executive Order on Improving 
Regulation and Regulatory Review.

DATES: Please submit any comments on or before July 13, 2015 for 
immediate consideration.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments only by one of the following methods:
    Email: RegsReview@ios.doi.gov.
    Mail: Regulatory Review, Office of the Executive Secretariat and 
Regulatory Affairs, Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW., Mail 
Stop 7328, Washington, DC 20240.
    Hand Delivery or Courier: Regulatory Review, Office of the 
Executive Secretariat and Regulatory Affairs, Department of the 
Interior, Room 7311, 1849 C Street NW., Washington, DC 20240.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Lawyer, Office of the Secretary, 
202-208-3181, Mark_Lawyer@ios.doi.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of the Interior (DOI) 
published a notice on February 25, 2011 (76 FR 10526), asking the 
public for ideas and information as it prepared a preliminary plan for 
retrospective regulatory review to comply with President Obama's 
Executive Order 13563 dated January 18, 2011, ``Improving Regulation 
and Regulatory Review.'' We received helpful

[[Page 30187]]

information in response to this request, which we considered in 
preparing our plan for retrospective regulatory review. The plan is 
available on DOI's Open Government Web site at: http://www.doi.gov/open/regsreview/. This Web site provides links to the plan, the 
Department's regulations, and an email in-box at RegsReview@ios.doi.gov 
that interested parties may use to suggest, on an ongoing basis, 
improvements to DOI's regulations.
    We continue to invite comment on all of our regulations but are 
specifically asking for public comment on the following regulations or 
policy documents at this time:

25 CFR part 169--Rights-of-Way on Indian Land (1076-AF20)
25 CFR part 23--Indian Child Welfare Act (1076-AF25)
25 CFR part 256--Housing Improvement Program (1076-AF22)
Expanding Incentives for Voluntary Conservation Actions Under the 
Endangered Species Act (1018-AY29)

Ongoing Public Engagement

    DOI views retrospective regulatory review as a continuing process. 
Public engagement is an essential element, and the public may submit 
feedback at any time via email at RegsReview@ios.doi.gov.
    At this time, we are asking for comments related to the following 
questions:
    (1) Are there any specific changes we could make to these 
regulations that would make them more effective or less burdensome in 
achieving their regulatory objectives?
    (2) DOI has proposed specific rules to review over the next two 
years. Are there other rules that could benefit from retrospective 
review in the near future? If so, please identify the rules by their 
CFR citation (e.g., 25 CFR part 39) or by their subject matter (e.g., 
forestry rules) and give us detailed ideas on how we can streamline, 
consolidate, or make these regulations more efficient. Please suggest 
specific language that would make these rules or guidance more 
efficient and less burdensome where possible.
    (3) Are there ways DOI can better scale its regulations to lessen 
the burdens imposed on small entities within the existing statutory 
requirements? Please suggest specific things we could do to exempt 
small entities or provide more flexible or less-burdensome requirements 
while still satisfying the requirements of the law.
    (4) Are DOI regulations and guidance written in language that is 
clear and easy to understand? Please suggest which regulations and 
guidance are good candidates for a rewriting in plain language.
    (5) How can we ensure that our regulations promote our mission in 
ways that are most efficient and least burdensome to the public?
    The Department is issuing this request solely to seek useful 
information as part of its ongoing public engagement process. Responses 
to this request do not bind DOI to any further actions related to the 
response.
    Before including your address, or other personal identifying 
information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire 
comment--including your personal identifying information--may be made 
publicly available at any time pursuant to the Freedom of Information 
Act. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal 
identifying information from the public review, we would seek to honor 
your request to the extent allowable under the law but we cannot 
guarantee that we will be able to do so.

    Authority:  E.O. 13653, 76 FR 3821, Jan. 21, 2011; E.O. 12866, 
58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993.

    Dated: May 20, 2015.
Michael L. Connor,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-12622 Filed 5-22-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4334-34-P

30186 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules

Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed The FAA’s authority to issue rules each side of the 073° bearing from the airport
Rulemaking Distribution System, which regarding aviation safety is found in extending from the 4-mile radius to 8 miles
describes the application procedure. Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, northeast of the airport, and within 1.8 miles
Section 106, describes the authority for each side of the 256° bearing from the airport
Availability and Summary of extending from the 4-mile radius to 7 miles
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, southwest of the airport.
Documents Proposed for Incorporation
Aviation Programs, describes in more
by Reference Issued in Seattle, Washington, on May 12,
detail the scope of the agency’s
authority. This rulemaking is 2015.
This document proposes to amend
FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace promulgated under the authority Christopher Ramirez,
Designations and Reporting Points, described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
dated August 6, 2014, and effective Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that Western Service Center.
September 15, 2014. FAA Order section, the FAA is charged with [FR Doc. 2015–12569 Filed 5–26–15; 8:45 am]
7400.9Y is publicly available as listed in prescribing regulations to assign the use BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
the ADDRESSES section of this proposed of the airspace necessary to ensure the
rule. FAA Order 7400.9Y lists Class A, safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic airspace. This regulation is within the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
service routes, and reporting points. scope of that authority as it would
amend controlled airspace at Ed Carlson Office of the Secretary
The Proposal
Memorial-South Lewis County Airport,
The FAA is proposing an amendment Toledo, WA. 25 CFR Chapters I, II, III, V, VI, and VII
to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations [156D0102DM DS6CS00000
Environmental Review
(14 CFR) Part 71 by modifying Class E DLSN00000.000000 DX6CS25]
airspace extending upward from 700 This proposal will be subject to an
feet above the surface at Ed Carlson environmental analysis in accordance Reducing Regulatory Burden;
Memorial Field-South Lewis County with FAA Order 1050.1E, Retrospective Review
Airport, Toledo, WA. After a review of ‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Interior.
the airspace, the FAA found
modification of the airspace necessary regulatory action. ACTION: Request for public input.
for the safety and management of IFR List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 SUMMARY: The Department of the
operations for SIAPs at the airport. The Interior is requesting public input on
Class E airspace area would be modified Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air). selected regulations as part of its plan to
to a 4-mile radius of the Ed Carlson review significant regulations in
Memorial-South Lewis County Airport, The Proposed Amendment response to the President’s Executive
with segments extending from the 4- Accordingly, pursuant to the Order on Improving Regulation and
mile radius to 8 miles northeast of the authority delegated to me, the Federal Regulatory Review.
airport, and 7 miles southwest of the Aviation Administration proposes to DATES: Please submit any comments on
airport. amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows: or before July 13, 2015 for immediate
Class E airspace designations are consideration.
published in paragraph 6005 of FAA PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
ADDRESSES: Submit comments only by
Order 7400.9Y, dated August 6, 2014, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
and effective September 15, 2014, which one of the following methods:
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND Email: RegsReview@ios.doi.gov.
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR REPORTING POINTS Mail: Regulatory Review, Office of the
71.1. The Class E airspace designations
■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR Executive Secretariat and Regulatory
listed in this document will be
part 71 continues to read as follows: Affairs, Department of the Interior, 1849
published subsequently in the Order.
C Street NW., Mail Stop 7328,
The FAA has determined this Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, Washington, DC 20240.
proposed regulation only involves an 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
Hand Delivery or Courier: Regulatory
established body of technical 1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
Review, Office of the Executive
regulations for which frequent and § 71.1 [Amended] Secretariat and Regulatory Affairs,
routine amendments are necessary to Department of the Interior, Room 7311,
■ 2. The incorporation by reference in
keep them operationally current. 1849 C Street NW., Washington, DC
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Y,
Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) 20240.
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
Points, dated August 6, 2014, and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
effective September 15, 2014, is Mark Lawyer, Office of the Secretary,
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
amended as follows: 202–208–3181, Mark_Lawyer@
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace areas ios.doi.gov.
does not warrant preparation of a extending upward from 700 feet or more SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated above the surface of the earth. Department of the Interior (DOI)
impact is so minimal. Since this is a * * * * * published a notice on February 25, 2011
Lhorne on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

routine matter that will only affect air ANM WA E5 Toledo, WA [Modified] (76 FR 10526), asking the public for
traffic procedures and air navigation, it ideas and information as it prepared a
Ed Carlson Memorial Field-South Lewis
is certified this proposed rule, when County Airport, WA preliminary plan for retrospective
promulgated, would not have a (Lat. 46°28′38″ N., long. 122°48′23″ W.) regulatory review to comply with
significant economic impact on a That airspace extending upward from 700 President Obama’s Executive Order
substantial number of small entities feet above the surface within a 4-mile radius 13563 dated January 18, 2011,
under the criteria of the Regulatory of the Ed Carlson Memorial Field-South ‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Flexibility Act. Lewis County Airport, and within 1.2 miles Review.’’ We received helpful

VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:31 May 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\27MYP1.SGM 27MYP1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules 30187

information in response to this request, good candidates for a rewriting in plain Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
which we considered in preparing our language. www.regulations.gov.
plan for retrospective regulatory review. (5) How can we ensure that our Email: DNI-FederalRegister@dni.gov.
The plan is available on DOI’s Open regulations promote our mission in Mail: Information Management
Government Web site at: http:// ways that are most efficient and least Division, Office of the Director of
www.doi.gov/open/regsreview/. This burdensome to the public? National Intelligence, Washington, DC
Web site provides links to the plan, the The Department is issuing this request 20511.
Department’s regulations, and an email solely to seek useful information as part
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
in-box at RegsReview@ios.doi.gov that of its ongoing public engagement
process. Responses to this request do Jennifer L. Hudson, Director,
interested parties may use to suggest, on Information Management Division,
an ongoing basis, improvements to not bind DOI to any further actions
related to the response. Office of the Chief Information Officer,
DOI’s regulations. Office of the Director of National
We continue to invite comment on all Before including your address, or
other personal identifying information Intelligence, Washington, DC 20511;
of our regulations but are specifically 703–874–8085.
asking for public comment on the in your comment, you should be aware
that your entire comment—including SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
following regulations or policy
documents at this time: your personal identifying information— compliance with the Privacy Act, 5
may be made publicly available at any U.S.C. 552a(e)(4), the ODNI describes in
25 CFR part 169—Rights-of-Way on
time pursuant to the Freedom of the notice section of this Federal
Indian Land (1076–AF20)
25 CFR part 23—Indian Child Welfare Information Act. While you can ask us Register the following two new systems
Act (1076–AF25) in your comment to withhold your of records: Counterintelligence Trends
25 CFR part 256—Housing Improvement personal identifying information from Analyses Records (ODNI/NCSC–002)
Program (1076–AF22) the public review, we would seek to and Insider Threat Program Records
Expanding Incentives for Voluntary honor your request to the extent (ODNI–22). As permitted by the Privacy
Conservation Actions Under the allowable under the law but we cannot Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(k), pursuant to this
Endangered Species Act (1018–AY29) guarantee that we will be able to do so. rulemaking, the Director of National
Authority: E.O. 13653, 76 FR 3821, Jan. Intelligence (DNI) is invoking
Ongoing Public Engagement 21, 2011; E.O. 12866, 58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, exemption of records in these systems
DOI views retrospective regulatory 1993. from the requirements of certain
review as a continuing process. Public Dated: May 20, 2015. provisions of the Privacy Act, as
engagement is an essential element, and Michael L. Connor,
described herein. In addition, the DNI is
the public may submit feedback at any invoking subsection 552a(k)(2) as a
Deputy Secretary.
time via email at RegsReview@ further basis of exemption for records
[FR Doc. 2015–12622 Filed 5–22–15; 8:45 am]
ios.doi.gov. contained in the existing system entitled
BILLING CODE 4334–34–P
At this time, we are asking for Information Technology Systems
comments related to the following Activity and Access Records (ODNI–19).
questions:
(1) Are there any specific changes we OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF Regulatory Flexibility Act
could make to these regulations that NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE This proposed rule affects the manner
would make them more effective or less in which the ODNI collects and
burdensome in achieving their 32 CFR Part 1701 maintains information about
regulatory objectives? Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation individuals. The ODNI certifies that this
(2) DOI has proposed specific rules to rulemaking will not have a significant
review over the next two years. Are AGENCY: Office of the Director of economic impact on a substantial
there other rules that could benefit from National Intelligence. number of small entities. Accordingly,
retrospective review in the near future? ACTION: Proposed rule. pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
If so, please identify the rules by their Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, no regulatory
CFR citation (e.g., 25 CFR part 39) or by SUMMARY: The Office of the Director of flexibility analysis is required for this
their subject matter (e.g., forestry rules) National Intelligence (ODNI) proposes rule.
and give us detailed ideas on how we to exempt two new systems of records
can streamline, consolidate, or make from subsections (c)(3); (d)(1),(2),(3),(4); Small Entity Inquiries
these regulations more efficient. Please (e)(1) and (e)(4)(G),(H),(I); and (f) of the The Small Business Regulatory
suggest specific language that would Privacy Act. With respect to the existing Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) of
make these rules or guidance more system of records named ODNI 1996 requires the ODNI to comply with
efficient and less burdensome where Information Technology Systems small entity requests for information
possible. Activity and Access Records (ODNI–19), and advice about compliance with
(3) Are there ways DOI can better the ODNI proposes to invoke subsection statutes and regulations within the
scale its regulations to lessen the (k)(2) as an additional rationale for ODNI’s jurisdiction. Any small entity
burdens imposed on small entities exempting records from these that has a question regarding this
within the existing statutory provisions of the Privacy Act. The ODNI document may address it to the
requirements? Please suggest specific has previously established a rule, information contact listed above.
published on March 28, 2008, that will
Lhorne on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

things we could do to exempt small Further information regarding SBREFA
entities or provide more flexible or less- preserve the exempt status of records it is available on the Small Business
burdensome requirements while still receives when the reason for the Administration’s Web page at http://
satisfying the requirements of the law. exemption remains valid. www.sga.gov/advo/law/law_lib.html.
(4) Are DOI regulations and guidance DATES: Submit comments on or before
written in language that is clear and July 6, 2015. Paperwork Reduction Act
easy to understand? Please suggest ADDRESSES: You may submit comments The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
which regulations and guidance are by any of the following methods: (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires that the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:31 May 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\27MYP1.SGM 27MYP1

Document Created: 2015-12-15 15:35:28
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 15:35:28

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Request for public input.
Dates		Please submit any comments on or before July 13, 2015 for immediate consideration.
Contact		Mark Lawyer, Office of the Secretary, 202-208-3181, [email protected]
FR Citation		80 FR 30186

80 FR 30186 - Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOROffice of the Secretary

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 101 (May 27, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary