80 FR 33241 - Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2012-2013
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 112 (June 11, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 112 (June 11, 2015)
| Page Range | 33241-33243 | |
| FR Document | 2015-14349 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 112 (Thursday, June 11, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 33241-33243] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-14349] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-924] Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2012- 2013 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On December 5, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the ``Department'') published its Preliminary Results in the 2012-2013 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip from the People's Republic of China (PRC).\1\ The period of review (``POR'') is November 1, 2012, through October 31, 2013. This review covers four companies: Shaoxing Xiangyu Green Packing Co. Ltd. (``Green Packing'') and Tianjin Wanhua Co., Ltd. (``Wanhua''), which were subject to individual examination, as well as Fuwei Films (Shandong) Co., Ltd. (``Fuwei Films'') and Sichuan Dongfang Insulating Material Co., Ltd., (``Dongfang'').\2\ Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made certain changes to our margin calculations for Wanhua. The final dumping margins for this review are listed in the ``Final Results'' section below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments and Partial Rescission of Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 72166 (December 5, 2014) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Department notes that Fuwei Films and Dongfang had no reviewable entries. \2\ The review of Huangshi Yucheng Trade Co., Ltd. was rescinded. See Preliminary Results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective Date: June 11, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Martin or Jonathan Hill, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 3936 or (202) 482-3518, respectively. Background On December 5, 2014, the Department published its Preliminary Results in this review. We received case briefs from Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc. and SKC, Inc. (collectively ``Petitioners''), Green Packing, and Wanhua on January 14, 2015.\3\ On January 26, 2015, Petitioners and Wanhua submitted rebuttal briefs.\4\ On March 23, 2015, Green Packing and Wanhua resubmitted case briefs and Petitioners resubmitted its rebuttal brief \5\ to redact certain untimely new factual information. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Letter from Petitioners to the Secretary of Commerce, ``Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from the People's Republic of China: Petitioners' Case Brief,'' dated January 14, 2015. Also, on January 14, 2015, the Department received a letter in lieu of a case brief from Terphane, Inc., in which Terphane, Inc. states that it supports the Department preliminary results and arguments made by Petitioners in Petitioners' case brief. See Wanhua's and Green Packing's resubmitted case briefs dated March 23, 2015. \4\ See Letter from Wanhua to the Secretary of Commerce, ``Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film from the People's Republic of China; A-570-924; Rebuttal Brief,'' dated January 26, 2015 (``Wanhua Rebuttal Brief''). Also, on January 26, 2015, the Department received a letter in lieu of a rebuttal brief from Terphane, Inc., in which Terphane, Inc. states that it supports all arguments made by Petitioners in Petitioners' case brief. See Petitioners resubmitted rebuttal brief dated March 23, 2015. \5\ See Letter from Green Packing to the Secretary of Commerce ``Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film from China,'' dated March 23, 2015; see also letter from Wanhua to the Secretary of Commerce, ``Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film from the People's Republic of China; A-570-924; Resubmission of Case Brief,'' dated March 23, 2015; see also letter from Petitioners to the Secretary of Commerce, ``Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from the People's Republic of China: Resubmission of Petitioners' Rebuttal Brief,'' dated March 23, 2015. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The products covered by the order are all gauges of raw, pre- treated, or primed PET film, whether extruded or co-extruded. PET film is classifiable under subheading 3920.62.00.90 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. For the full text of the scope of the order, see Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2012-2013 Administrative Review,'' (``Issues and Decision Memorandum''), dated concurrently with this notice. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the [[Page 33242]] issues that parties raised and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum follows as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The paper copy and electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we revised the margin calculations for Wanhua. Specifically, we corrected two errors in our calculations by deducting marine insurance expenses \6\ and value added taxes \7\ from Wanhua's U.S. sales prices, both of which we inadvertently failed to deduct in the Preliminary Results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 6. \7\ See Memorandum from Jonathan Hill, International Trade Compliance Analyst to Howard Smith, Program Manager, AD/CVD Operation, Office IV ``Analysis for the Final Results of the 2012- 2013 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip from the People's Republic of China: Tianjin Wanhua Co., Ltd.,'' dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Determination of No Shipments For these final results, the Department continues \8\ to find that Fuwei Films and Dongfang did not have any reviewable entries during the POR.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Preliminary Results and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at ``Preliminary Determination of No Shipments.'' \9\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the POR: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter dumping margin (percentage) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shaoxing Xiangyu Green Packing Co. Ltd.................. 35.10 Tianjin Wanhua Co., Ltd................................. 72.15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment Rates The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of these final results of this review. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we are calculating importer- (or customer-) specific assessment rates for the merchandise subject to this review. For any individually examined respondent whose weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), the Department will calculate importer- (or customer)-specific assessment rates for merchandise subject to this review. Where appropriate, we calculated a per-unit rate for each importer (or customer) by dividing the total dumping margins for reviewed sales to that party by the total sales quantity associated with those transactions. For duty-assessment rates calculated on this basis, we will direct CBP to assess the resulting per-unit rate against the entered quantity of the subject merchandise.\10\ We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer- specific assessment rate is above de minimis. Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted- Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales database submitted by an exporter individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate (i.e., 76.72 percent).\11\ Additionally, if the Department determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of this notice in the Federal Register, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporters listed above, the cash deposit rate will be the rate listed for each exporter in the table in the ``Final Results'' section of this notice; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate previously established for the PRC-wide entity; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these final results of review within five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties has occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order (``APO'') This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing these results of administrative review and publishing [[Page 33243]] notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: June 3, 2015. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--Issues and Decision Memorandum Summary Scope of the Order Discussion of the Issues I. General Issues Comment 1: Respondent Selection Comment 2: Surrogate Country Selection A. Whether South Africa is a Significant Producer of Comparable Merchandise B. Quality of the Indonesian and South African Surrogate Value Data C. Surrogate Financial Statements Comment 3: SV for Paper Core II. Company-Specific Issues Comment 4: Treatment of Green Packing's Reintroduced PET By- Product Comment 5: Value-Added Tax (``VAT'') Adjustment to Wanhua's U.S. Sales Price Comment 6: Deduction of Marine Insurance from Wanhua's U.S. Sales Prices Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015-14349 Filed 6-10-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 112 / Thursday, June 11, 2015 / Notices 33241
800–977–8339 and providing the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE SKC, Inc. (collectively ‘‘Petitioners’’),
operator with the conference call Green Packing, and Wanhua on January
number 1–888–510–1765 and International Trade Administration 14, 2015.3 On January 26, 2015,
conference call ID code 8558900#. Petitioners and Wanhua submitted
[A–570–924]
Members of the public are invited to rebuttal briefs.4 On March 23, 2015,
submit written comments; the Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Green Packing and Wanhua resubmitted
comments must be received in the Sheet, and Strip From the People’s case briefs and Petitioners resubmitted
regional office by Monday, July 27, Republic of China: Final Results of its rebuttal brief 5 to redact certain
2015. Written comments may be mailed Antidumping Duty Administrative untimely new factual information.
to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. Review and Final Determination of No Scope of the Order
Commission on Civil Rights, 1331 Shipments; 2012–2013 The products covered by the order are
Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 1150,
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, all gauges of raw, pre-treated, or primed
Washington, DC 20425, faxed to (202)
International Trade Administration, PET film, whether extruded or co-
376–7548, or emailed to Evelyn Bohor at
Department of Commerce. extruded. PET film is classifiable under
ero@usccr.gov. Persons who desire
SUMMARY: On December 5, 2014, the subheading 3920.62.00.90 of the
additional information may contact the
Department of Commerce (the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
Eastern Regional Office at (202) 376–
‘‘Department’’) published its United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the
7533.
Preliminary Results in the 2012–2013 HTSUS subheadings are provided for
Records and documents discussed convenience and customs purposes, our
during the meeting will be available for administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on written description of the scope of the
public viewing as they become available order is dispositive.
at http://facadatabase.gov/committee/ polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet,
and strip from the People’s Republic of For the full text of the scope of the
meetings.aspx?cid=2681 and clicking on order, see Memorandum to Ronald K.
the ‘‘Meeting Details’’ and ‘‘Documents’’ China (PRC).1 The period of review
Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary
links. Records generated from this (‘‘POR’’) is November 1, 2012, through
for Enforcement and Compliance from
meeting may also be inspected and October 31, 2013. This review covers
Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
reproduced at the Eastern Regional four companies: Shaoxing Xiangyu
Secretary for Antidumping and
Office, as they become available, both Green Packing Co. Ltd. (‘‘Green
Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Issues
before and after the meeting. Persons Packing’’) and Tianjin Wanhua Co., Ltd.
and Decision Memorandum for the
interested in the work of this advisory (‘‘Wanhua’’), which were subject to
Final Results of the 2012–2013
committee are advised to go to the individual examination, as well as
Administrative Review,’’ (‘‘Issues and
Commission’s Web site, www.usccr.gov, Fuwei Films (Shandong) Co., Ltd.
Decision Memorandum’’), dated
or to contact the Eastern Regional Office (‘‘Fuwei Films’’) and Sichuan Dongfang
concurrently with this notice.
at the above phone number, email or Insulating Material Co., Ltd.,
street address. (‘‘Dongfang’’).2 Based on our analysis of Analysis of Comments Received
the comments received, we made All issues raised in the case and
Agenda certain changes to our margin rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this
calculations for Wanhua. The final review are addressed in the Issues and
Welcome and Introductions
dumping margins for this review are Decision Memorandum, which is hereby
Tara Martinez, Vice Chair listed in the ‘‘Final Results’’ section adopted by this notice. A list of the
Discuss Plans for Future Briefing below.
Meeting DATES: Effective Date: June 11, 2015. 3 See Letter from Petitioners to the Secretary of
WV State Advisory Committee FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commerce, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip from the People’s Republic of
Administrative Matters Thomas Martin or Jonathan Hill, AD/ China: Petitioners’ Case Brief,’’ dated January 14,
Ivy L. Davis, DFO CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement 2015. Also, on January 14, 2015, the Department
and Compliance, International Trade received a letter in lieu of a case brief from
DATES: Friday, June 26, 2015 at 10:00 Administration, U.S. Department of Terphane, Inc., in which Terphane, Inc. states that
a.m. (EDT). Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
it supports the Department preliminary results and
arguments made by Petitioners in Petitioners’ case
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; brief. See Wanhua’s and Green Packing’s
via teleconference: telephone: (202) 482–3936 or (202) 482– resubmitted case briefs dated March 23, 2015.
4 See Letter from Wanhua to the Secretary of
Conference Call-in Number: 1–888– 3518, respectively.
Commerce, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film
510–1765; Conference Call ID code: Background from the People’s Republic of China; A–570–924;
8558900#. Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated January 26, 2015 (‘‘Wanhua
On December 5, 2014, the Department Rebuttal Brief’’). Also, on January 26, 2015, the
TDD: Dial Federal Relay Service 1–
published its Preliminary Results in this Department received a letter in lieu of a rebuttal
800–977–8339 and give the operator the brief from Terphane, Inc., in which Terphane, Inc.
review. We received case briefs from
above states that it supports all arguments made by
Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc. and Petitioners in Petitioners’ case brief. See Petitioners
Conference Call-in number and resubmitted rebuttal brief dated March 23, 2015.
Conference Call ID code. 1 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 5 See Letter from Green Packing to the Secretary
Strip from the People’s Republic of China: of Commerce ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivy Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Film from China,’’ dated March 23, 2015; see also
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
L. Davis at ero@usccr.gov, or 202–376– Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination letter from Wanhua to the Secretary of Commerce,
7533. of No Shipments and Partial Rescission of Review; ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film from the
2012–2013, 79 FR 72166 (December 5, 2014) People’s Republic of China; A–570–924;
Dated: Friday, June 5, 2015. (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Resubmission of Case Brief,’’ dated March 23, 2015;
David Mussatt, Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The see also letter from Petitioners to the Secretary of
Chief, Regional Programs Unit. Department notes that Fuwei Films and Dongfang Commerce, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
had no reviewable entries. Sheet, and Strip from the People’s Republic of
[FR Doc. 2015–14237 Filed 6–10–15; 8:45 am] 2 The review of Huangshi Yucheng Trade Co., China: Resubmission of Petitioners’ Rebuttal Brief,’’
BILLING CODE 6335–01–P Ltd. was rescinded. See Preliminary Results. dated March 23, 2015.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:06 Jun 10, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM 11JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_33353/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 112 / Thursday, June 11, 2015 / Notices 33243
notice in accordance with sections directed to Laurie Mease, Office of practice in considering textile safeguard
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. Textiles and Apparel, U.S. Department actions, CITA will consider an
Dated: June 3, 2015. of Commerce, Telephone: 202–482– interested party to be an entity (which
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
2043, Email: Laurie.Mease@trade.gov. may be a trade association, firm,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: certified or recognized union, or group
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
of workers) that is representative of
I. Abstract either: (A) A domestic producer or
Appendix—Issues and Decision Title III, Subtitle B, Section 321 producers of an article that is like or
Memorandum through Section 328 of the United directly competitive with the subject
Summary States-Colombia Trade Promotion Colombian textile or apparel article; or
Scope of the Order Agreement Implementation Act (the (B) a domestic producer or producers of
Discussion of the Issues ‘‘Act’’) [Pub. L. 112–42] implements the a component used in the production of
I. General Issues textile and apparel safeguard provisions, an article that is like or directly
Comment 1: Respondent Selection provided for in Article 3.1 of the United competitive with the subject Colombian
Comment 2: Surrogate Country Selection States-Colombia Trade Promotion textile or apparel article.
A. Whether South Africa is a Significant Agreement (the ‘‘Agreement’’). This In order for a request to be
Producer of Comparable Merchandise safeguard mechanism applies when, as considered, the requester must provide
B. Quality of the Indonesian and South the following information in support of
a result of the elimination of a customs
African Surrogate Value Data
C. Surrogate Financial Statements duty under the Agreement, a Colombian a claim that a textile or apparel article
Comment 3: SV for Paper Core textile or apparel article is being from Colombia is being imported into
II. Company-Specific Issues imported into the United States in such the United States in such increased
Comment 4: Treatment of Green Packing’s increased quantities, in absolute terms quantities, in absolute terms or relative
Reintroduced PET By-Product or relative to the domestic market for to the domestic market for that article,
Comment 5: Value-Added Tax (‘‘VAT’’) that article, and under such conditions and under such conditions as to cause
Adjustment to Wanhua’s U.S. Sales Price as to cause serious damage or actual serious damage or actual threat thereof,
Comment 6: Deduction of Marine threat thereof to a U.S. industry to a U.S. industry producing an article
Insurance from Wanhua’s U.S. Sales producing a like or directly competitive that is like, or directly competitive with,
Prices
article. In these circumstances, Article the imported article: (1) Name and
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015–14349 Filed 6–10–15; 8:45 am] 3.1 permits the United States to increase description of the imported article
duties on the imported article from concerned; (2) import data
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Colombia to a level that does not exceed demonstrating that imports of a
the lesser of the prevailing U.S. normal Colombian origin textile or apparel
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE trade relations (NTR)/most-favored- article that are like or directly
nation (MFN) duty rate for the article or competitive with the articles produced
International Trade Administration the U.S. NTR/MFN duty rate in effect on by the domestic industry concerned are
the day before the Agreement entered increasing in absolute terms or relative
Proposed Information Collection; into force. to the domestic market for that article;
Comment Request; Procedures for The Statement of Administrative (3) U.S. domestic production of the like
Considering Requests and Comments Action accompanying the Act provides or directly competitive articles of U.S.
From the Public for Textile and Apparel that the Committee for the origin indicating the nature and extent
Safeguard Actions on Imports From Implementation of Textile Agreements of the serious damage or actual threat
Colombia (CITA) will issue procedures for thereof, along with an affirmation that to
requesting such safeguard measures, for the best of the requester’s knowledge,
AGENCY: International Trade making its determinations under the data represent substantially all of
Administration (ITA), Commerce. Section 322(a) of the Act, and for the domestic production of the like or
ACTION: Notice. providing relief under section 322(b) of directly competitive article(s) of U.S.
SUMMARY: The Department of the Act. origin; (4) imports from Colombia as a
In Proclamation No. 8818 (77 FR percentage of the domestic market of the
Commerce, as part of its continuing
29519, May 18, 2012), the President like or directly competitive article; and
effort to reduce paperwork and
delegated to CITA his authority under (5) all data available to the requester
respondent burden, invites the general
Subtitle B of Title III of the Act with showing changes in productivity,
public and other Federal agencies to
respect to textile and apparel safeguard utilization of capacity, inventories,
take this opportunity to comment on
measures. exports, wages, employment, domestic
proposed and/or continuing information CITA must collect information in
collections, as required by the prices, profits, and investment, and any
order to determine whether a domestic other information, relating to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. textile or apparel industry is being existence of serious damage or actual
DATES: Written comments must be adversely impacted by imports of these threat thereof caused by imports from
submitted on or before August 10, 2015. products from Colombia, thereby Colombia to the industry producing the
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments allowing CITA to take corrective action like or directly competitive article that
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental to protect the viability of the domestic is the subject of the request. To the
Paperwork Clearance Officer, textile industry, subject to section extent that such information is not
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
322(b) of the Act. available, the requester should provide
14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Pursuant to Section 321(a) of the Act best estimates and the basis therefore.
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the and Section (9) of Presidential If CITA determines that the request
Internet at JJessup@doc.gov). Proclamation 8818, an interested party provides the information necessary for it
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: in the U.S. domestic textile and apparel to be considered, CITA will publish a
Requests for additional information or industry may file a request for a textile notice in the Federal Register seeking
copies of the information collection and apparel safeguard action with CITA. public comments regarding the request.
instrument and instructions should be Consistent with longstanding CITA The comment period shall be 30
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:06 Jun 10, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM 11JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_33353/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 15:07:26
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 15:07:26
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Thomas Martin or Jonathan Hill, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 3936 or (202) 482-3518, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 33241 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR