80_FR_34484 80 FR 34369 - Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Pursuant to Settlement

80 FR 34369 - Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Pursuant to Settlement

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 115 (June 16, 2015)

Page Range34369-34370
FR Document2015-14769

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 2015) 
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34369-34370]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14769]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-891]


Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From the People's Republic 
of China: Notice of Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review Pursuant to Settlement

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: Effective Date: June 16, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Hoefke or Robert James, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4947 and (202) 482-0649, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On July 16, 2012, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the final results of its administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on hand trucks and certain parts thereof from 
People's Republic of China.\1\ The period of review (POR) is December 
1, 2009, through November 30, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof from the People's 
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 77 FR 41744 (July 16, 2012) (Final Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The administrative review covered New-Tec Integration (Xiamen) Co., 
Ltd. (New-Tec), an exporter of hand trucks and certain parts thereof 
from the People's Republic of China to the United States. In the Final 
Results, the Department assigned to New-Tec a weighted-average dumping 
margin of 41.49 percent for the 2009-2010 period of review.
    Following the publication of the Final Results, Gleason Industrial 
Products, Inc. and Precision Products, Inc. (collectively, Gleason), 
domestic interested parties, and Cosco Home and Office Products 
(Cosco), a U.S. importer, filed lawsuits with the United States Court 
of International Trade (CIT) challenging various aspects of the 
Department's final results of administrative review.
    The United States, Gleason, and Cosco have entered into an 
agreement to settle this dispute. Pursuant to the terms of settlement 
and the stipulation for entry of judgment, the amended final weighted-
average dumping margin for New-Tec is 20.89 percent. The Court issued 
its Order of Judgment by Stipulation on May 29, 2015.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Gleason Industrial Products, Inc. v. United States, 
Consol. Court No. 12-00234, Doc. No. 114 (May 29, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    The Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. The 
Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP within 15 
days after the date of publication of these amended final results of 
review in the Federal Register.
    We have calculated importer-specific per-unit antidumping duty 
assessment rates by aggregating the total amount of dumping calculated 
for the examined sales of each importer and dividing each of these 
amounts by the total entered quantity associated with those sales.\3\

[[Page 34370]]

We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries covered by this review where an importer-specific assessment 
rate is not zero or de minimis. We will instruct CBP to liquidate 
without regard to antidumping duties any entries for which the 
importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Memorandum to: The File ``Per-Unit Assessment 
Calculation for New-Tec Integration (Xiamen) Co., Ltd. (New-Tec) in 
the Amended Final Results of Admininstrative Review of the 
Antidumping Order on Hand Trucks and Parts Thereof from the People's 
Republic of China; 2009-2010'' dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    Since the Final Results, the Department completed a subsequent 
administrative review of, and established a new cash deposit rate for, 
New-Tec. Therefore, New-Tec's cash deposit rate does not need to be 
updated as a result of these amended final results. Rather, New-Tec's 
cash deposit rate will continue to be 0.00 percent, the rate 
established in that review.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From the People's 
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2011-2012, 79 FR 44008 (July 29, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred, and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    We are issuing this determination and publishing these amended 
final results and notice in accordance with 19 U.S.C. 1516(e).

     Dated: June 9, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-14769 Filed 6-15-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Notices 34369 People’s Republic of China meet the exclusion criteria for a finished Background good as the wall standards do not contain A–570–967 and C–570–968: Aluminum non-aluminum extruded components beyond On July 16, 2012, the Department of Extrusions From the People’s Republic of fasteners. Ford Atlantic’s folding tripod Commerce (the Department) published China display easels, consisting of aluminum the final results of its administrative Requestor: Camco Manufacturing, Inc. extrusions and non-extruded aluminum review of the antidumping duty order (‘‘Camco’’); Camco’s 20-foot telescoping flag components (i.e., various non-extruded on hand trucks and certain parts thereof poles, consisting of aluminum extrusion joints, connectors, and caps) which go from People’s Republic of China.1 The tubes, finials, carabiners, capping balls, beyond mere fasteners, are outside the scope locking buttons, tube stops and caps, and flag period of review (POR) is December 1, of the orders under the finished goods clips, are outside the scope of the order exclusion because they are finished goods 2009, through November 30, 2010. under the finished goods exclusion because containing aluminum extrusions as parts that The administrative review covered they are finished goods containing aluminum are fully and permanently assembled and New-Tec Integration (Xiamen) Co., Ltd. extrusions as parts that are fully and completed at the time of entry; March 4, (New-Tec), an exporter of hand trucks permanently assembled and completed at the 2015. and certain parts thereof from the time of entry; January 8, 2015. People’s Republic of China to the A–570–890: Wooden Bedroom From the A–570–967 and C–570–968: Aluminum People’s Republic of China United States. In the Final Results, the Extrusions From the People’s Republic of Department assigned to New-Tec a China Requestor: Bassett Mirror Company, Inc.; Borghese Lady’s Writing Desk is excluded weighted-average dumping margin of Requestor: Sign-Zone, Inc.; Sign-Zones from the scope of the antidumping duty order 41.49 percent for the 2009–2010 period ‘‘Premium Event Tent Frames’’ are outside because it is office furniture; March 26, 2015. of review. the scope of the orders because the tent Following the publication of the Final frames constitute ‘‘finished merchandise Interested parties are invited to Results, Gleason Industrial Products, containing aluminum extrusions as parts that comment on the completeness of this Inc. and Precision Products, Inc. are fully and permanently assembled and list of completed scope and completed at the time of entry;’’ January 23, (collectively, Gleason), domestic anticircumvention inquiries. Any interested parties, and Cosco Home and 2015. comments should be submitted to the Office Products (Cosco), a U.S. importer, A–570–967 and C–570–968: Aluminum Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD filed lawsuits with the United States Extrusions From the People’s Republic of Operations, Enforcement and Court of International Trade (CIT) China Compliance, International Trade challenging various aspects of the Requestor: 5 Diamond Promotions, Inc. (‘‘5 Administration, 14th Street and Department’s final results of Diamond’’); 5 Diamond’s aluminum flag pole Constitution Avenue NW., APO/Dockets administrative review. kits are within the scope of the orders Unit, Room 1870, Washington, DC because the aluminum flag pole kits do not The United States, Gleason, and 20230. Cosco have entered into an agreement to meet the exclusion criteria for a ‘‘finished This notice is published in goods kit,’’ as the aluminum flag pole kits settle this dispute. Pursuant to the terms solely contain aluminum extrusions and accordance with 19 CFR 351.225(o). of settlement and the stipulation for fasteners; February 5, 2015. Dated: June 5, 2015. entry of judgment, the amended final A–570–967 and C–570–968: Aluminum Christian Marsh, weighted-average dumping margin for Extrusions From the People’s Republic of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping New-Tec is 20.89 percent. The Court China and Countervailing Duty Operations. issued its Order of Judgment by Requestor: Unger Enterprises Inc. [FR Doc. 2015–14768 Filed 6–15–15; 8:45 am] Stipulation on May 29, 2015.2 (‘‘Unger’’); Unger’s telescoping poles, BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Assessment Rates consisting of aluminum extrusion tubes, polypropylene tube plugs, polypropylene The Department shall determine, and hand grips, and polypropylene locking DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on collars, are outside the scope of the orders all appropriate entries covered by this under the finished goods exclusion because International Trade Administration review. The Department intends to issue they are finished goods containing aluminum extrusions as parts that are fully and assessment instructions to CBP within [A–570–891] 15 days after the date of publication of permanently assembled and completed at the time of entry; February 19, 2015. these amended final results of review in Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof the Federal Register. A–570–967 and C–570–968: Aluminum From the People’s Republic of China: We have calculated importer-specific Extrusions From the People’s Republic of Notice of Amended Final Results of China per-unit antidumping duty assessment Antidumping Duty Administrative rates by aggregating the total amount of Requestor: Aqua EZ, Inc. (‘‘Aqua EZ’’); Review Pursuant to Settlement Aqua EZ’s side cam-lock telepoles and ribbed dumping calculated for the examined telescopic poles, consisting of aluminum AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, sales of each importer and dividing each extrusion tubes, white plastic locking International Trade Administration, of these amounts by the total entered mechanisms, and white plastic handles, are Department of Commerce. quantity associated with those sales.3 outside the scope of the orders under the DATES: Effective Date: June 16, 2015. finished goods exclusion because they are 1 See Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof finished goods containing aluminum FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results extrusions as parts that are fully and Scott Hoefke or Robert James, AD/CVD of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES permanently assembled and completed at the Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and 41744 (July 16, 2012) (Final Results). 2 See Gleason Industrial Products, Inc. v. United time of entry; March 2, 2015. Compliance, International Trade States, Consol. Court No. 12–00234, Doc. No. 114 A–570–967 and C–570–968: Aluminum Administration, U.S. Department of (May 29, 2015). Extrusions From the People’s Republic of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 3 See Memorandum to: The File ‘‘Per-Unit China Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; Assessment Calculation for New-Tec Integration telephone: (202) 482–4947 and (202) (Xiamen) Co., Ltd. (New-Tec) in the Amended Final Requestor: Ford Atlantic; Ford Atlantic’s Results of Admininstrative Review of the wall standards are within the scope of the 482–0649, respectively. Antidumping Order on Hand Trucks and Parts orders because the wall standards do not SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Continued VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:18 Jun 15, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM 16JNN1

34370 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 115 / Tuesday, June 16, 2015 / Notices We will instruct CBP to assess determination in the less-than-fair-value in Malaysian currency per kilogram. No antidumping duties on all appropriate investigation of certain steel nails from other party commented on this entries covered by this review where an Malaysia, to correct a ministerial error. allegation. We agree with Petitioner that importer-specific assessment rate is not DATES: Effective Date: June 16, 2015. we made a ministerial error within the zero or de minimis. We will instruct FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: meaning of 19 CFR 351.224(f) with CBP to liquidate without regard to Edythe Artman or Steve Bezirganian, respect to the recalculated U.S. warranty antidumping duties any entries for AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, expense field. Therefore, we are which the importer-specific assessment Enforcement and Compliance, amending the final determination in rate is zero or de minimis. International Trade Administration, accordance with section 751(h) of the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e). Cash Deposit Requirements Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Amended Final Determination Since the Final Results, the Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) Department completed a subsequent The Department determines that the 482–3931 or (202) 482–1131, following amended weighted-average administrative review of, and respectively. established a new cash deposit rate for, dumping margins exist for the period New-Tec. Therefore, New-Tec’s cash SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: April 1, 2013 through March 31, 2014, deposit rate does not need to be updated as discussed above: 4 Background as a result of these amended final results. Rather, New-Tec’s cash deposit On May 20, 2015, the Department Weighted- published the final determination of the average rate will continue to be 0.00 percent, the Exporter or producer dumping rate established in that review.4 less-than-fair-value investigation of margin certain steel nails from Malaysia.1 On (percent) Notification to Importers May 22, 2015, Mid Continent Steel & This notice also serves as a final Wire, Inc., (Petitioner), submitted a Region System Sdn. Bhd. and ministerial error allegation.2 No other Region International Co., Ltd .. 2.66 reminder to importers of their All Others .................................... 2.66 responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) party commented on this allegation. to file a certificate regarding the Based on our analysis of this allegation, we revised the margin Continuation of Suspension of reimbursement of antidumping duties calculation for Region System Sdn. Bhd. Liquidation prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. and Region International Co., Ltd. The following cash deposit Failure to comply with this requirement (collectively, Region), and assigned a requirements will be effective upon could result in the Secretary’s new All Others rate, as discussed publication of this notice for all presumption that reimbursement of below.3 shipments of subject merchandise antidumping duties occurred, and the entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, Scope of the Investigation subsequent assessment of double for consumption on or after the antidumping duties. The scope of the investigation appears publication of this amended final We are issuing this determination and in Appendix I of the Final determination, as provided by section publishing these amended final results Determination. 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit and notice in accordance with 19 U.S.C. Ministerial Error rate for Region will be the rate we 1516(e). determined in this amended final Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of determination (i.e., 2.66 percent); (2) the Dated: June 9, 2015. 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR cash deposit rates for Inmax and Tag Paul Piquado, 351.224(f) define a ‘‘ministerial error’’ as will continue to be those identified in Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and an error ‘‘in addition, subtraction, or the Final Determination (i.e., 39.35 Compliance. other arithmetic function, clerical error percent) (3) if the exporter is not a firm [FR Doc. 2015–14769 Filed 6–15–15; 8:45 am] resulting from inaccurate copying, identified in this investigation but the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P duplication, or the like, and any other producer is, the rate will be the rate similar type of unintentional error established for the producer of the which the Secretary considers subject merchandise; and (4) the rate for DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ministerial.’’ all other producers or exporters will be Petitioner noted that in the Final 2.66 percent, as indicated above. These International Trade Administration Determination, we recalculated the U.S. suspension of liquidation instructions [A–557–816] warranty expense field such that it was will remain in effect until further notice. denominated in U.S. dollars per kilogram, but then applied currency U.S. International Trade Commission Certain Steel Nails From Malaysia: exchange conversions to the U.S. Notification Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value warranty expenses in the U.S. margin In accordance with section 735(d) of calculation as if they were denominated the Act, we notified the U.S. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Commission (ITC) of International Trade Administration, 1 See Certain Steel Nails From Malaysia; Final the Final Determination and our Department of Commerce. Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 80 amended final determination. As the asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES FR 28969 (May 20, 2015) (Final Determination). Final Determination and our SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 2 See Letter from Petitioner to the Department, (the Department) is amending its final ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from Malaysia: Petitioner’s preliminary determination were both Ministerial Error Allegation,’’ dated May 22, 2015. affirmative, in accordance with section Thereof from the People’s Republic of China; 2009– 3 See also the memorandum entitled ‘‘Amended 2010’’ dated concurrently with this notice. Final Determination of the Less-Than-Fair-Value 4 Note that the weighted-average dumping 4 See Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof Investigation of Certain Steel Nails from Malaysia: margins of 39.35 percent identified in the Final From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results Allegation of Ministerial Error,’’ dated concurrently Determination for Inmax Sdn. Bhd. (‘‘Inmax’’) and of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011– with this determination and hereby adopted by this Tag Fasteners Sdn. Bhd. (‘‘Tag’’) remain unchanged. 2012, 79 FR 44008 (July 29, 2014). notice. See Final Determination at 28970. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:18 Jun 15, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM 16JNN1


Document Created: 2018-02-22 10:22:58
Document Modified: 2018-02-22 10:22:58
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesEffective Date: June 16, 2015.
ContactScott Hoefke or Robert James, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 4947 and (202) 482-0649, respectively.
FR Citation80 FR 34369 
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR