80_FR_34831 80 FR 34715 - Temporary Emergency Committee of the Board of Governors; Sunshine Act Meeting

80 FR 34715 - Temporary Emergency Committee of the Board of Governors; Sunshine Act Meeting

POSTAL SERVICE

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 116 (June 17, 2015)

Page Range34715-34715
FR Document2015-14949

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 2015) 
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 116 (Wednesday, June 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 34715]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14949]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Temporary Emergency Committee of the Board of Governors; Sunshine 
Act Meeting

DATES AND TIMES: June 10, 2015, at 1:30 p.m.

PLACE: Washington, DC, via Teleconference.

STATUS: Committee Votes to Close June 10, 2015, Meeting: By telephone 
vote on June 10, 2015, members of the Temporary Emergency Committee of 
the Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service met and 
voted unanimously to close to public observation its meeting held in 
Washington, DC, via teleconference. The Committee determined that no 
earlier public notice was possible.

MATTERS CONSIDERED: 

Wednesday, June 10, 2015, at 1:30 p.m.

    1. Strategic Issues.
    2. Pricing.

GENERAL COUNSEL CERTIFICATION: The General Counsel of the United States 
Postal Service has certified that the meeting was properly closed under 
the Government in the Sunshine Act.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000, telephone (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,
Secretary, Board of Governors.
[FR Doc. 2015-14949 Filed 6-16-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 116 / Wednesday, June 17, 2015 / Notices 34715 four. Water supplies world-wide are • Can the challenge be achieved in SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE vulnerable to threats such as the next decade? If not, how long will COMMISSION contaminants, changes in land use, it take? shifting and increasing population, • Why is this challenge worth [Release No. 34–75149; File No. SR–EDGX– climate change, and extreme weather. pursuing now? What recent advances, 2015–26] And one in nine people (750 million trends, or research point to this worldwide) lack access to clean challenge being solvable in the Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX drinking water. Although sea water is proposed time frame? Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and widely available, it currently costs Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed approximately $2,000 to desalinate an • What opportunities are there for partnerships between the Federal Rule Change Related to Fees for Use acre foot of water (or about $6 per 1000 government, State and regional of EDGX Exchange, Inc. gallons)—about twice the rate a typical homeowner pays for tap water. governments, foundations, industry, and June 11, 2015. Advances in nanotechnology, such as academia to support the solution of the nanoporous materials for separation challenge? Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the membranes and nanoparticles that • Why do you expect this challenge Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the remove contaminants, offer the to capture the public’s imagination? ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 possibility of much faster, cheaper, and notice is hereby given that on June 9, Ted Wackler, 2015, EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the more environmentally-friendly methods for desalination and other treatment Deputy Chief of Staff and Assistant Director. ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with the applications that could dramatically [FR Doc. 2015–14914 Filed 6–16–15; 8:45 am] Securities and Exchange Commission improve the global supply of drinkable BILLING CODE 3270–F5–P (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule water. change as described in Items I, II and III 6. Determine the environmental, below, which Items have been prepared health, and safety characteristics of a by the Exchange.3 The Exchange has nanomaterial in a month. The need to POSTAL SERVICE designated the proposed rule change as more quickly and accurately determine one establishing or changing a member whether engineered nanomaterials may Temporary Emergency Committee of due, fee, or other charge imposed by the pose a risk to the public and the the Board of Governors; Sunshine Act Meeting Exchange under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) environment continues to be a major of the Act 4 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) challenge to the commercialization of thereunder,5 which renders the nanotechnology for societal and public DATES AND TIMES: June 10, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. proposed rule change effective upon benefit. Much more efficient methods, filing with the Commission. The including high-throughput toxicity PLACE:Washington, DC, via Commission is publishing this notice to measurements, sensors to detect Teleconference. solicit comments on the proposed rule nanomaterials in the environment, and change from interested persons. accurate, predictive models for risk STATUS: Committee Votes to Close June assessment, are needed to ensure that 10, 2015, Meeting: By telephone vote on I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s the safety of each product containing June 10, 2015, members of the Statement of the Terms of Substance of engineered nanomaterials is understood Temporary Emergency Committee of the the Proposed Rule Change throughout its lifecycle, enabling new Board of Governors of the United States products to be quickly and confidently Postal Service met and voted The Exchange filed a proposal to made available to the public. unanimously to close to public amend its fees and rebates applicable to observation its meeting held in Members 6 of the Exchange pursuant to Questions Washington, DC, via teleconference. The EDGX Rule 15.1(a) and (c) (‘‘Fee Respondents are asked to address the Committee determined that no earlier Schedule’’) to increase the fee for orders following general questions for each public notice was possible. yielding fee code K, which routes to grand challenge proposed, including for MATTERS CONSIDERED: NASDAQ OMX PSX (‘‘PSX’’) using any of the grand challenge concepts ROUC or ROUE routing strategy. listed above (or proposed variations): Wednesday, June 10, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. The text of the proposed rule change • What is the audacious yet achievable goal proposed? 1. Strategic Issues. is available at the Exchange’s Web site • Why is it important for the Federal 2. Pricing. at www.batstrading.com, at the government and others to invest in principal office of the Exchange, and at GENERAL COUNSEL CERTIFICATION: The the Commission’s Public Reference solving this challenge? • What would success look like? How General Counsel of the United States Room. would you know the challenge has been Postal Service has certified that the met? For the examples provided, are the meeting was properly closed under the 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). proposed end points appropriate and Government in the Sunshine Act. 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 3 The Commission notes that a previous version ambitious yet achievable? CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: • What would be potential of the proposal was filed as SR–EDGX–2015–25. asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the Board, The proposal was withdrawn on June 9, 2015. nanotechnology solutions to the U.S. Postal Service, 475 L’Enfant Plaza 4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). challenge and what intermediate steps SW., Washington, DC 20260–1000, 5 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). and activities are necessary to develop telephone (202) 268–4800. 6 The term ‘‘Member’’ is defined as ‘‘any those solutions? registered broker or dealer, or any person associated • What potential metrics and Julie S. Moore, with a registered broker or dealer, that has been Secretary, Board of Governors. admitted to membership in the Exchange. A milestones could be used to measure Member will have the status of a ‘‘member’’ of the intermediate progress towards solving [FR Doc. 2015–14949 Filed 6–16–15; 8:45 am] Exchange as that term is defined in Section 3(a)(3) the challenge? BILLING CODE 7710–12–P of the Act.’’ See Exchange Rule 1.5(n). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:47 Jun 16, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00110 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM 17JNN1


Document Created: 2015-12-15 14:22:32
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 14:22:32
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation80 FR 34715 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR