80 FR 35571 - Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Columbia River, Cathlamet, WA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 119 (June 22, 2015)

Page Range		35571-35573
FR Document		2015-15323

The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone in Cathlamet, WA. This safety zone is necessary to help ensure the safety of the maritime public during a fireworks display and will do so by prohibiting unauthorized persons and vessels from entering the safety zones unless authorized by the Sector Columbia River Captain of the Port or his designated representatives.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 119 (Monday, June 22, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35571-35573]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15323]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2015-0358]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Columbia River, Cathlamet, WA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone in Cathlamet, 
WA. This safety zone is necessary to help ensure the safety of the 
maritime public during a fireworks display and will do so by 
prohibiting unauthorized persons and vessels from entering the safety 
zones unless authorized by the Sector Columbia River Captain of the 
Port or his designated representatives.

DATES: This rule is effective on July 18, 2015 from 10:00 p.m. to 11:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket 
[USCG-2015-0358]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the 
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also 
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground 
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Ken Lawrenson, Waterways Management Division, Marine 
Safety Unit Portland, Coast Guard; telephone 503-240-9319, email 
msupdxwwm@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting 
material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket 
Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule

A. Regulatory History and Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior 
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553, the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with 
respect to this rule. Waiting for a 30 day notice period to run would 
be impracticable. The Coast Guard did not receive the necessary 
information in time for this regulation to undertake both an NPRM and a 
30 day delayed effective date. Additionally, waiting for a 30 day 
notice period to run would be impracticable as delayed promulgation may 
result in injury or damage to persons and vessels from the hazards 
associated with fireworks displays.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register due to the late notification of 
this event and because the event will have occurred before comments 
could have been taken.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for this proposed rule is: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 
U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of 
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; which collectively authorize 
the Coast Guard to establish regulatory safety zones for safety and 
environmental purposes.
    Fireworks displays create hazardous conditions for the maritime 
public because of the large number of vessels that congregate near the 
displays, as well as the noise, falling debris, and explosions that 
occur during the event. Due to the presence of a fireworks show, a 
safety zone is necessary in order to reduce vessel traffic congestion 
in the proximity of fireworks discharge sites and to prevent vessel 
traffic within the fallout zone of the fireworks.

C. Discussion of the Temporary Final Rule

    This rule establishes one safety zone in the Sector Columbia River 
Captain of the Port Zone.
    The safety zone will encompass the waters included within a 500 
foot radius at the following approximate location: 46[deg]12'14'' N; 
123[deg]23'17'' W, along the Columbia River, in Cathlamet, WA. This 
safety zone will be effective on Saturday July 18, 2015 from 10:00 p.m. 
to 11:00 p.m.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on these statutes and executive orders.

 1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as 
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and 
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of

[[Page 35572]]

potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 
12866 or under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of 
Management and Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. The Coast 
Guard has made this determination based on the fact that the safety 
zone created by this rule will not significantly affect the maritime 
public because vessels may still coordinate their transit with the 
Coast Guard in the vicinity of the safety zone.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    (1) This rule may affect the following entities, some of which may 
be small entities: The owners and operators of vessels intending to 
operate in the area covered by the safety zone. The rule will not have 
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
because the safety zones will only be in effect for a limited period of 
time. Additionally, vessels can still transit through the zone with the 
permission of the Captain of the Port. Before the effective period, we 
will publish advisories in the Local Notice to Mariners available to 
users of the river. Maritime traffic will be able to schedule their 
transits around the safety zone.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, 
above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined 
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

 6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

 7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such expenditure, we do not discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

 11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

 12. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive 
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect 
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined 
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not 
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human 
environment. This rule involves the creation of one safety zone during 
fireworks displays to protect maritime public. This rule is 
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of 
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis 
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion 
Determination are

[[Page 35573]]

available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any 
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant 
environmental impact from this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is 
amending 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T13-0358 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T13-0358  Safety Zone; Cathlamet Bald Eagle Days Firework 
Display, Cathlamet, WA.

    (a) Safety Zones. The following area is a designated safety zone:
    (1) Location. All waters along the Columbia River, Cathlamet, WA, 
within a 500 foot radius at the approximate position of 46[deg]12'14'' 
N; 123[deg]23'17'' W.
    (2) Enforcement Period. This event will be held on July 18, 2015 
from 10:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.
    (b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33 
CFR part 165, subpart C, no person may enter or remain in the safety 
zone created in this section or bring, cause to be brought, or allow to 
remain in the safety zone created in this section any vehicle, vessel, 
or object unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his 
designated representative. The Captain of the Port may be assisted by 
other Federal, State, or local agencies with the enforcement of the 
safety zone.
    (c) Authorization. All vessel operators who desire to enter the 
safety zone must obtain permission from the Captain of the Port or 
Designated Representative by contacting either the on-scene patrol 
craft on VHF Ch 13 or Ch 16 or the Coast Guard Sector Columbia River 
Command Center via telephone at (503) 861-6211.

    Dated: May 19, 2015.
D.J. Travers,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2015-15323 Filed 6-19-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

35572 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 119 / Monday, June 22, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

potential costs and benefits under Small businesses may send comments Interference with Constitutionally
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 on the actions of Federal employees Protected Property Rights.
or under section 1 of Executive Order who enforce, or otherwise determine
9. Civil Justice Reform
13563. The Office of Management and compliance with, Federal regulations to
Budget has not reviewed it under those the Small Business and Agriculture This rule meets applicable standards
Orders. The Coast Guard has made this Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
determination based on the fact that the and the Regional Small Business Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
safety zone created by this rule will not Regulatory Fairness Boards. The minimize litigation, eliminate
significantly affect the maritime public Ombudsman evaluates these actions ambiguity, and reduce burden.
because vessels may still coordinate annually and rates each agency’s 10. Protection of Children
their transit with the Coast Guard in the responsiveness to small business. If you
vicinity of the safety zone. wish to comment on actions by We have analyzed this rule under
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– Executive Order 13045, Protection of
2. Impact on Small Entities Children from Environmental Health
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 Coast Guard will not retaliate against Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, small entities that question or complain an economically significant rule and
requires federal agencies to consider the about this rule or any policy or action does not create an environmental risk to
potential impact of regulations on small of the Coast Guard. health or risk to safety that may
entities during rulemaking. The term disproportionately affect children.
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small 4. Collection of Information
businesses, not-for-profit organizations 11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule will not call for a new
that are independently owned and collection of information under the This rule does not have tribal
operated and are not dominant in their Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 implications under Executive Order
fields, and governmental jurisdictions U.S.C. 3501–3520). 13175, Consultation and Coordination
with populations of less than 50,000. with Indian Tribal Governments,
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 5. Federalism because it does not have a substantial
605(b) that this rule will not have a A rule has implications for federalism direct effect on one or more Indian
significant economic impact on a under Executive Order 13132, tribes, on the relationship between the
substantial number of small entities. Federalism, if it has a substantial direct Federal Government and Indian tribes,
(1) This rule may affect the following effect on the States, on the relationship or on the distribution of power and
entities, some of which may be small between the national government and responsibilities between the Federal
entities: The owners and operators of the States, or on the distribution of Government and Indian tribes.
vessels intending to operate in the area power and responsibilities among the
covered by the safety zone. The rule will 12. Energy Effects
various levels of government. We have
not have a significant economic impact analyzed this rule under that Order and This action is not a ‘‘significant
on a substantial number of small entities determined that this rule does not have energy action’’ under Executive Order
because the safety zones will only be in implications for federalism. 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
effect for a limited period of time. That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Additionally, vessels can still transit 6. Protest Activities Distribution, or Use.
through the zone with the permission of The Coast Guard respects the First 13. Technical Standards
the Captain of the Port. Before the Amendment rights of protesters.
effective period, we will publish Protesters are asked to contact the This rule does not use technical
advisories in the Local Notice to person listed in the FOR FURTHER standards. Therefore, we did not
Mariners available to users of the river. INFORMATION CONTACT section to consider the use of voluntary consensus
Maritime traffic will be able to schedule coordinate protest activities so that your standards.
their transits around the safety zone. message can be received without 14. Environment
If you think that your business, jeopardizing the safety or security of
organization, or governmental people, places or vessels. We have analyzed this rule under
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity Department of Homeland Security
and that this rule would have a 7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Management Directive 023–01 and
significant economic impact on it, The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
please submit a comment (see of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires which guide the Coast Guard in
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it Federal agencies to assess the effects of complying with the National
qualifies and how and to what degree their discretionary regulatory actions. In Environmental Policy Act of 1969
this rule would economically affect it. particular, the Act addresses actions (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
that may result in the expenditure by a have determined that this action is one
3. Assistance for Small Entities of a category of actions that do not
State, local, or tribal government, in the
Under section 213(a) of the Small aggregate, or by the private sector of individually or cumulatively have a
Business Regulatory Enforcement $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or significant effect on the human
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104– more in any one year. Though this rule environment. This rule involves the
121), we want to assist small entities in will not result in such expenditure, we creation of one safety zone during
understanding this rule. If the rule do not discuss the effects of this rule fireworks displays to protect maritime
would affect your small business, elsewhere in this preamble. public. This rule is categorically
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES

organization, or governmental excluded from further review under
jurisdiction and you have questions 8. Taking of Private Property paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
concerning its provisions or options for This rule will not cause a taking of Commandant Instruction. An
compliance, please contact the person private property or otherwise have environmental analysis checklist
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION taking implications under Executive supporting this determination and a
CONTACT, above. Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Categorical Exclusion Determination are

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:04 Jun 19, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM 22JNR1

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 119 / Monday, June 22, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 35573

available in the docket where indicated POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION MCS changes that were more significant
under ADDRESSES. We seek any than minor corrections to the MCS but
comments or information that may lead 39 CFR Part 3020 did not rise to the level of a product list
to the discovery of a significant [Docket No. RM2015–6; Order No. 2543] modification. The proposed rules
environmental impact from this rule. distinguished between material changes
Changes or Corrections to Mail and minor corrections to the descriptive
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 content in the MCS and proposed
Classification Schedule
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation procedures for the initiation and review
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. of each type of change. The notice of
requirements, Security measures, ACTION: Final rule. proposed rulemaking was also
Waterways. published in the Federal Register. 79 FR
SUMMARY: The Commission is issuing a 69781 (November 24, 2014).
For the reasons discussed in the set of final rules addressing changes and The Postal Service and the Public
preamble, the Coast Guard is amending corrections to the Mail Classification Representative submitted initial
33 CFR part 165 as follows: Schedule (MCS). The final rules comments suggesting changes to the
establish procedures for material rules proposed in Order No. 2250.3 The
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
changes in services offered in Postal Service also submitted reply
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
connection with products and comments.4 After consideration of the
■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 corrections to product descriptions. comments submitted, the Commission
continues to read as follows: Relative to the proposed rules, all adopts the proposed rules, modified as
changes are minor and non-substantive. described below.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
DATES: Effective July 22, 2015.
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; III. Section-by-Section Analysis
Department of Homeland Security Delegation FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
No. 0170.1. David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at In general, the Postal Service and
202–789–6820. Public Representative offered positive
■ 2. Add § 165.T13–0358 to read as comments with respect to the
follows: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Commission’s proposed rules. See, e.g.,
Regulatory History Postal Service Comments at 1, PR
§ 165.T13–0358 Safety Zone; Cathlamet
Comments at 3. Both commenters also
Bald Eagle Days Firework Display, 72 FR 63662, November 9, 2007
Cathlamet, WA. offered suggestions that they assert
79 FR 69781, November 24, 2014
would improve or clarify the proposed
(a) Safety Zones. The following area is Table of Contents rules. The comments primarily focused
a designated safety zone: on two issues: The contents of the
(1) Location. All waters along the I. Introduction supporting justification for a material
Columbia River, Cathlamet, WA, within II. Background change to a MCS product description
a 500 foot radius at the approximate III. Summary of Comments Received and
and the provisions concerning the
position of 46°12′14″ N; 123°23′17″ W. Explanation of Revisions
IV. Ordering Paragraphs Commission’s review of requests to
(2) Enforcement Period. This event make either a material change or minor
will be held on July 18, 2015 from 10:00 correction to the MCS. The
I. Introduction
p.m. to 11:00 p.m. Commission’s analysis of the comments
(b) Regulations. In accordance with In this Order, the Commission adopts received is discussed below.
the general regulations in 33 CFR part final rules regarding requests to change
165, subpart C, no person may enter or or correct the Mail Classification A. Section 3020.81 (Supporting
remain in the safety zone created in this Schedule (MCS). Justification for Changes to Product
section or bring, cause to be brought, or Descriptions)
II. Background
allow to remain in the safety zone Section 3020.81 of the proposed rules
created in this section any vehicle, The Commission is charged with lists the supporting justification that
vessel, or object unless authorized by maintaining accurate product lists. See must be filed by the Postal Service when
the Captain of the Port or his designated 39 U.S.C. 3642. In Docket No. RM2007– it proposes a material change to a
representative. The Captain of the Port 1, the Commission promulgated rules product description in the MCS. As
may be assisted by other Federal, State, establishing the MCS as the vehicle for proposed, paragraph (c) required the
or local agencies with the enforcement presenting the product lists with Postal Service to describe the impact
of the safety zone. necessary descriptive content.1 Those that the proposed material changes will
(c) Authorization. All vessel operators rules are codified at 39 CFR part 3020, have on users of the product and on
who desire to enter the safety zone must subparts A–F. competitors as part of its supporting
obtain permission from the Captain of On November 14, 2014, the justification for its request to make a
the Port or Designated Representative by Commission issued a notice of proposed material change to a product
contacting either the on-scene patrol rulemaking and requested comments on description.
craft on VHF Ch 13 or Ch 16 or the proposed rules regarding requests to The Postal Service comments that the
Coast Guard Sector Columbia River change or correct the MCS (specifically, requirement in proposed section
Command Center via telephone at (503) replacing 39 CFR part 3020, subpart E).2 3020.81(c) is more strenuous than the
861–6211. Order No. 2250 described how the requirement that currently applies to
regulations did not satisfactorily address
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES

Dated: May 19, 2015. 3 Initial Comments of the United States Postal
D.J. Travers, 1 Docket No. RM2007–1, Order No. 26, Order Service, December 24, 2014 (Postal Service
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Proposing Regulations to Establish a System of Comments); Public Representative Comments,
Port, Sector Columbia River. Ratemaking, August 15, 2007, at 85. December 24, 2014 (PR Comments).
2 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Changes and 4 Reply Comments of the United State Postal
[FR Doc. 2015–15323 Filed 6–19–15; 8:45 am] Corrections to the Mail Classification Schedule, Service, January 8, 2015 (Postal Service Reply
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P November 14, 2014 (Order No. 2250). Comments).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:04 Jun 19, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\22JNR1.SGM 22JNR1

Document Created: 2018-02-22 11:13:40
Document Modified: 2018-02-22 11:13:40

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective on July 18, 2015 from 10:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Ken Lawrenson, Waterways Management Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland, Coast Guard; telephone 503-240-9319, email [email protected] If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
FR Citation		80 FR 35571
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

80 FR 35571 - Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Columbia River, Cathlamet, WA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 119 (June 22, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard