80 FR 35936 - Certain Pasta from Italy: Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 120 (June 23, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 120 (June 23, 2015)
| Page Range | 35936-35938 | |
| FR Document | 2015-15471 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 120 (Tuesday, June 23, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 35936-35938] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-15471] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-475-818] Certain Pasta from Italy: Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On August 12, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the Department) initiated a changed circumstances review of the antidumping duty order on certain pasta from Italy in order to determine whether La Molisana S.p.A. (La Molisana) is the successor-in-interest to La Molisana Industrie Alimentari, S.p.A. (LMI), a respondent in the investigation and several administrative reviews.\1\ We preliminarily determine that La Molisana is not the successor-in-interest to LMI. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Certain Pasta from Italy: Initiation of Changed Circumstances Review, 79 FR 47090 (August 12, 2014) (Initiation Notice). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective date June 23, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Moore, Office III, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3962. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On July 24, 1996, the Department published in the Federal Register the antidumping duty order on pasta from Italy.\2\ The most recently completed administrative review for LMI was for the July 1, 1998 to June 30, 1999 period.\3\ Pursuant to Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, the Department recalculated the cash deposit rate for LMI and assigned it a de minimis margin.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order and Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Pasta From Italy, 61 FR 38547 (July 24, 1996); see also Notice of Second Amendment to the Final Determination and Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Pasta From Italy; 61 FR 42231 (August 14, 1996). \3\ See Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 65 FR 77852 (December 13, 2000). \4\ See Notice of Implementation of Determination Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From Belgium, Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars From Latvia, Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From Finland, Certain Pasta From Italy, Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From the Netherlands, Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Spain, Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From Italy, Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils From Japan, 77 FR 36257 (June 18, 2012) (Notice of Section 129 Implementation). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On June 23, 2014, La Molisana requested a changed circumstances review. On August 12, 2014, the Department initiated this review.\5\ On October 20, 2014, New World Pasta Company and Dakota Growers Pasta Company (hereinafter referred to as Petitioners) submitted comments on La Molisana's request for a changed circumstance review. On December 3, 2014, the Department requested additional information from La Molisana, which was submitted, in part, on January 9, 2015, and after an extension was granted, the remainder was submitted on January 28, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the Supplemental Response). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Initiation Notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On February 6, 2015, Petitioners submitted comments on La Molisana's Supplemental Response. On February 11, 2015, La Molisana objected to Petitioners' February 6, 2015, submission and requested that the Department reject it because it contained untimely filed, uncertified, new factual information. On February 20, 2015, the Department decided not to reject Petitioners' February 6, 2015 submission.\6\ La Molisana filed comments on February 27, 2015, regarding the Department's decision. On March 4, 2015, the Department requested additional information from La Molisana, which was provided on March 24, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as Second Supplemental Response). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See letter from Eric B. Greynolds, Program Manager, Office III, AD/CVD Operations, dated February 20, 2015. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On April 27, 2015, we extended the time period for issuing the final results of this changed circumstance review by 90 days.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Letter from Melissa G. Skinner, Director Office III, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to La Molisana, dated April 7, 2015. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order Imports covered by this order are shipments of certain non-egg dry pasta [[Page 35937]] in packages of five pounds four ounces or less, whether or not enriched or fortified or containing milk or other optional ingredients such as chopped vegetables, vegetable purees, milk, gluten, diastasis, vitamins, coloring and flavorings, and up to two percent egg white. The pasta covered by this scope is typically sold in the retail market, in fiberboard or cardboard cartons, or polyethylene or polypropylene bags of varying dimensions. For a full description of the scope, see the Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review Regarding Successor-In-Interest Analysis: Certain Pasta from Italy memorandum dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice.\8\ The Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review memorandum is a business proprietary document of which the public version is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046, of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, titled ``Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review Regarding Successor-In-Interest Analysis: Certain Pasta from Italy'' dated concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review In this changed circumstances review, pursuant to section 751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department conducted a successor-in-interest analysis. In making such a successor-in- interest determination, the Department examines several factors including, but not limited to, changes in: (1) Management; (2) production facilities; (3) supplier relationships; and (4) customer base.\9\ While no one or combination of these factors will necessarily provide a dispositive indication, the Department will generally consider the new company to be the successor to the previous company if its resulting operation is not materially dissimilar to that of its predecessor.\10\ Thus, if the evidence demonstrates that, with respect to the production and sale of the subject merchandise, the new company operates as the same business entity as the former company, the Department will assign the new company the cash deposit rate of its predecessor.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See, e.g., Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape from Italy: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 75 FR 8925 (February 26, 2010), unchanged in Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 75 FR 27706 (May 18, 2010); and Brake Rotors From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 70 FR 69941 (November 18, 2005) (Brake Rotors), citing Brass Sheet and Strip from Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 57 FR 20460 (May 13, 1992), and Certain Pasta From Italy: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 79 FR 56339 (September 19, 2014) (Delverde). \10\ See, e.g., Brake Rotors. See also Delverde. \11\ Id.; see also, e.g., Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From India, 77 FR 64953 (October 24, 2012), unchanged in Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From India, 77 FR 73619 (December 11, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Based on the totality of the record evidence and on comments from interested parties, we preliminarily determine that La Molisana is materially dissimilar to LMI in terms of management, production facilities, and supplier relationships. Therefore, we preliminarily find that La Molisana is not the successor-in-interest to LMI.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See Preliminary Results in Changed Circumstances Review memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Consequently, we preliminarily determine that La Molisana should not be given the same antidumping duty treatment as LMI. This determination will apply to all entries of the subject merchandise entered or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this changed circumstances review.\13\ If we reach the same conclusion in the final results, then the cash deposit for La Molisana will continue to be 15.45 percent, the all-others rate established in the antidumping duty investigation, as modified by the section 129 determination.\14\ This cash deposit requirement will remain in effect until a company-specific rate is calculated for La Molisana.\15\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin from Italy: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review, 68 FR 25327 (May 12, 2003). See also Delverde. \14\ See Notice of Implementation of Section 129. \15\ La Molisana is currently being reviewed in an administrative review covering the period July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 51548 (August 29, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public Comment Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit cases briefs not later than 10 days after the date of publication of this notice via ACCESS. ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046, of the main Department of Commerce building. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs. Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by ACCESS, no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 10 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in case briefs. Consistent with 19 CFR 351.216(e), we will issue the final results of this changed circumstances review no later than 270 days after the date on which this review was initiated, or within 45 days after the publication of the preliminary results if all parties in this review agree to our preliminary results. We are issuing and publishing this determination and notice in accordance with sections 751(b) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216 and 351.221. Dated: June 10, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Changed Circumstances Review Decision Memorandum I. Summary [[Page 35938]] II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of Methodology V. Analysis 1. Management 2. Production Facilities 3. Supplier Relationship 4. Customer Base [FR Doc. 2015-15471 Filed 6-22-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![35936 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 120 / Tuesday, June 23, 2015 / Notices
Rescission of Review regulations and terms of an APO is a period.3 Pursuant to Section 129 of the
violation which is subject to sanction. Uruguay Round Agreements Act, the
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the This notice is issued and published in Department recalculated the cash
Department will rescind an accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and deposit rate for LMI and assigned it a de
administrative review, in whole or in 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as minimis margin.4
part, if the party that requested the amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). On June 23, 2014, La Molisana
review withdraws its request within 90 requested a changed circumstances
Dated: June 17, 2015.
days of the publication of the notice of review. On August 12, 2014, the
initiation of the requested review. In Christian Marsh,
Department initiated this review.5 On
this case, Petitioner and Domestic Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
October 20, 2014, New World Pasta
Processors timely withdrew their Company and Dakota Growers Pasta
request by the 90-day deadline, and no [FR Doc. 2015–15468 Filed 6–22–15; 8:45 am]
Company (hereinafter referred to as
other party requested an administrative BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Petitioners) submitted comments on La
review of the antidumping duty order. Molisana’s request for a changed
As a result, pursuant to 19 CFR circumstance review. On December 3,
351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
2014, the Department requested
administrative review of shrimp from International Trade Administration additional information from La
the PRC for the period February 1, 2014, Molisana, which was submitted, in part,
through January 31, 2015, in its entirety. [A–475–818] on January 9, 2015, and after an
Assessment extension was granted, the remainder
Certain Pasta from Italy: Notice of was submitted on January 28, 2015
Preliminary Results of Antidumping (hereinafter referred to as the
The Department will instruct U.S.
Duty Changed Circumstances Review Supplemental Response).
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
to assess antidumping duties on all AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, On February 6, 2015, Petitioners
appropriate entries. Because the International Trade Administration, submitted comments on La Molisana’s
Department is rescinding this Department of Commerce. Supplemental Response. On February
administrative review in its entirety, the SUMMARY: On August 12, 2014, the 11, 2015, La Molisana objected to
entries to which this administrative Department of Commerce (the Petitioners’ February 6, 2015,
review pertained shall be assessed Department) initiated a changed submission and requested that the
antidumping duties at rates equal to the circumstances review of the Department reject it because it
cash deposit of estimated antidumping antidumping duty order on certain pasta contained untimely filed, uncertified,
duties required at the time of entry, or from Italy in order to determine whether new factual information. On February
withdrawal from warehouse, for La Molisana S.p.A. (La Molisana) is the 20, 2015, the Department decided not to
consumption, in accordance with 19 successor-in-interest to La Molisana reject Petitioners’ February 6, 2015
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department Industrie Alimentari, S.p.A. (LMI), a submission.6 La Molisana filed
intends to issue appropriate assessment respondent in the investigation and comments on February 27, 2015,
instructions to CBP 15 days after the several administrative reviews.1 We regarding the Department’s decision. On
publication of this notice in the Federal preliminarily determine that La March 4, 2015, the Department
Register, if appropriate. Molisana is not the successor-in-interest requested additional information from
to LMI. We invite interested parties to La Molisana, which was provided on
Notifications March 24, 2015 (hereinafter referred to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Effective date June 23, 2015.
as Second Supplemental Response).
This notice serves as a final reminder On April 27, 2015, we extended the
to importers of their responsibility FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: time period for issuing the final results
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a Stephanie Moore, Office III, AD/CVD of this changed circumstance review by
certificate regarding the reimbursement Operations, Enforcement and 90 days.7
of antidumping duties prior to Compliance, International Trade
liquidation of the relevant entries Administration, U.S. Department of Scope of the Order
during this review period. Failure to Commerce, 14th and Constitution Imports covered by this order are
comply with this requirement could Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; shipments of certain non-egg dry pasta
result in the Department’s presumption telephone: (202) 482–3962.
that reimbursement of the antidumping SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 3 See Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of
duties occurred and the subsequent Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 65 FR
assessment of doubled antidumping Background 77852 (December 13, 2000).
4 See Notice of Implementation of Determination
duties. On July 24, 1996, the Department Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round
This notice also serves as a final published in the Federal Register the Agreements Act: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From
reminder to parties subject to antidumping duty order on pasta from Belgium, Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars From
Italy.2 The most recently completed Latvia, Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From
administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) Finland, Certain Pasta From Italy, Purified
of their responsibility concerning the administrative review for LMI was for Carboxymethylcellulose From the Netherlands,
return or destruction of proprietary the July 1, 1998 to June 30, 1999 Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Spain, Granular
information disclosed under APO in Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From Italy, Stainless
1 See Certain Pasta from Italy: Initiation of Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils From Japan, 77 FR
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), 36257 (June 18, 2012) (Notice of Section 129
Changed Circumstances Review, 79 FR 47090
which continues to govern business (August 12, 2014) (Initiation Notice). Implementation).
proprietary information in this segment 2 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order and 5 See Initiation Notice.
of the proceeding. Timely written Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 6 See letter from Eric B. Greynolds, Program
notification of the return or destruction Than Fair Value: Certain Pasta From Italy, 61 FR Manager, Office III, AD/CVD Operations, dated
38547 (July 24, 1996); see also Notice of Second February 20, 2015.
of APO materials, or conversion to Amendment to the Final Determination and 7 See Letter from Melissa G. Skinner, Director
judicial protective order, is hereby Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Pasta From Italy; Office III, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
requested. Failure to comply with the 61 FR 42231 (August 14, 1996). Operations to La Molisana, dated April 7, 2015.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:39 Jun 22, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM 23JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_36056/page/1.svg)
![35938 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 120 / Tuesday, June 23, 2015 / Notices
II. Background • Mail: Christopher Kirkpatrick, There are no capital costs or operating
III. Scope of the Order Secretary of the Commission, and maintenance costs associated with
IV. Discussion of Methodology Commodity Futures Trading this collection.
V. Analysis Commission, Three Lafayette Centre,
1. Management Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
2. Production Facilities
1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC
20581. Dated: June 17, 2015.
3. Supplier Relationship
4. Customer Base • Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as Robert N. Sidman,
Mail above. Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–15471 Filed 6–22–15; 8:45 am]
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// [FR Doc. 2015–15344 Filed 6–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P www.regulations.gov/. Follow the BILLING CODE 6351–01–P
instructions for submitting comments
through the Portal.
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING A copy of the supporting statements CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION for the collection of information COMMISSION
discussed above may be obtained by
Agency Information Collection visiting RegInfo.gov. All comments must [Docket No. CPSC– 2014–0033]
Activities Under OMB Review be submitted in English, or if not,
accompanied by an English translation. Notice of Availability: Estimated
AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Phthalate Exposure and Risk to
Commission. Comments will be posted as received to
http://www.cftc.gov. Pregnant Women and Women of
ACTION: Notice. Reproductive Age as Assessed Using
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hannah Ropp, Surveillance Analyst, Four NHANES Biomonitoring Data Sets
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Division of Market Oversight; (2005/2006, 2007/2008, 2009/2010, 2011/
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Commodity Futures Trading 2012)
(‘‘PRA’’), this notice announces that the
Information Collection Request (‘‘ICR’’) Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, AGENCY: U.S. Consumer Product Safety
abstracted below has been forwarded to 1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC Commission.
the Office of Management and Budget 20581; phone: (202) 418–5228; fax: (202) ACTION: Notice of availability.
(‘‘OMB’’) for review and comment. The 418–5507; email: hropp@cftc.gov, and
ICR describes the nature of the refer to OMB Control No. 3038–0013. SUMMARY: The Consumer Product Safety
information collection and its expected SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Commission (‘‘Commission,’’ or
costs and burden. Title: ‘‘Exemptions from Speculative ‘‘CPSC’’) is announcing the availability
DATES: Comments must be submitted on Limits (OMB Control No. 3038–0013).’’ of a document titled, ‘‘Estimated
or before July 23, 2015. This is a request for extension of a Phthalate Exposure and Risk to Pregnant
currently approved information Women and Women of Reproductive
ADDRESSES: Comments regarding the
collection. Age as Assessed Using Four NHANES
burden estimated or any other aspect of Abstract: Section 4a(a) of the
the information collection, including Biomonitoring Data Sets (2005/2006,
Commodity Exchange Act (‘‘Act’’) 2007/2008, 2009/2010, 2011/2012).’’
suggestions for reducing the burden, allows the Commission to set
may be submitted directly to the Office DATES: Submit comments by August 7,
speculative limits in any commodity for 2015.
of Information and Regulatory Affairs in future delivery in order to prevent
OMB, within 30 days of the notice’s ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
excessive speculation. Certain sections
publication, by email at of the Act and the Commission’s identified by Docket No. CPSC- 2014–
OIRAsubmissions@omb.eop.gov. Please Regulations allow exemptions from the 0033, by any of the following methods:
identify the comments by OMB Control speculative limits for persons using the Electronic Submissions: Submit
No. 3038–0013. Please provide the market for hedging and, under certain electronic comments to the Federal
Commodity Futures Trading circumstances, for commodity pool eRulemaking Portal at: http://
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) with a operators and similar traders. This www.regulations.gov. Follow the
copy of all submitted comments at the information collection contains the instructions for submitting comments.
address listed below. Please refer to recordkeeping and reporting The Commission does not accept
OMB Reference No. 3038–0013, found requirements needed to ensure comments submitted by electronic mail
on http://reginfo.gov. Comments may regulatory compliance with Commission (email), except through
also be mailed to the Office of rules relating to this issue. www.regulations.gov. The Commission
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Burden Statement: The respondent encourages you to submit electronic
Office of Management and Budget, burden for this collection is estimated to comments by using the Federal
Attention: Desk Officer for the be 3 hours per response. These eRulemaking Portal, as described above.
Commodity Futures Trading estimates include the time to locate the Written Submissions: Submit written
Commission, 725 17th Street NW., information related to the exemptions submissions by mail/hand delivery/
Washington, DC 20503, and Hannah and to file necessary exemption courier to: Office of the Secretary,
Ropp, Surveillance Analyst, Division of paperwork. Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Market Oversight, Commodity Futures Respondents/Affected Entities: Swap Room 820, 4330 East West Highway,
Trading Commission, 1155 21st Street Dealers, Large Traders, and other Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301)
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
NW., Washington, DC 20581. entities affected by Rules 1.47 and 1.48 504–7923.
Comments may also be submitted by and Part 150 of the Commission’s Instructions: All submissions received
any of the following methods: regulations. must include the agency name and
• The Agency’s Web site, via its Estimated number of respondents: 9. docket number for this notice. All
Comments Online process: http:// Estimated total annual burden on comments received may be posted
comments.cftc.gov. Follow the respondents: 48 hours. without change, including any personal
instructions for submitting comments Frequency of collection: 1–2 reports identifiers, contact information, or other
through the Web site. annually. personal information provided, to:
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:39 Jun 22, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM 23JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_36056/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-22 11:15:22
Document Modified: 2018-02-22 11:15:22
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective date June 23, 2015. | |
| Contact | Stephanie Moore, Office III, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3962. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 35936 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR