80 FR 36922 - Safety Zone for Fireworks Display, Chesapeake Bay, Prospect Bay; Queen Anne's County, MD

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 124 (June 29, 2015)

Page Range		36922-36924
FR Document		2015-15759

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone encompassing certain waters of Prospect Bay. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during a fireworks display launched from a barge located between Hog Island and Kent Island in Queen Anne's County, MD on July 4, 2015. This safety zone is intended to protect the maritime public in a portion of Prospect Bay.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 124 (Monday, June 29, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36922-36924]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15759]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2015-0279]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone for Fireworks Display, Chesapeake Bay, Prospect Bay; 
Queen Anne's County, MD

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone 
encompassing certain waters of Prospect Bay. This action is necessary 
to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during a 
fireworks display launched from a barge located between Hog Island and 
Kent Island in Queen Anne's County, MD on July 4, 2015. This safety 
zone is intended to protect the maritime public in a portion of 
Prospect Bay.

DATES: This rule is effective from 8:30 p.m. on July 4, 2015 through 10 
p.m. on July 5, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket 
[USCG-2015-0279]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the 
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also 
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground 
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Mr. Ronald Houck, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, MD; 
telephone 410-576-2674, email [email protected]. If you have 
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl 
Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

A. Regulatory History and Information

    On May 5, 2015, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
entitled ``Safety Zone for Fireworks Display, Chesapeake Bay, Prospect 
Bay; Queen Anne's County, MD'' in the Federal Register (80 FR 25634). 
We received no comments on the proposed rule. No public meeting was 
requested, and none was held. The permanent safety zones listed in the 
Table to 33 CFR 165.506 do not apply to this event.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register. Due to the need for immediate 
action, the restriction of vessel traffic is necessary to protect life, 
property and the environment; therefore, to allow 30 days after 
publication notice is impracticable. Delaying the effective date would 
be contrary to the safety zone's intended objectives of protecting 
persons and vessels, and enhancing public and maritime safety.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis and authorities for this rule are found in 33 
U.S.C. 1231; 33 CFR 1.05-1 and 160.5; and Department of Homeland 
Security Delegation No. 0170.1., which collectively authorize the Coast 
Guard to propose, establish, and define regulatory safety zones. 
Fireworks displays are frequently held from locations on or near the 
navigable waters of the United States. The potential hazards associated 
with fireworks displays are a safety concern during such events. The 
purpose of this rule is to promote public and maritime safety during a 
fireworks display, and to protect mariners transiting the area from the 
potential hazards associated with a fireworks display, such as the 
accidental discharge of fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and falling 
hot embers or other debris. This rule is needed to ensure safety on the 
waterway before, during and after the scheduled event.

C. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Final Rule

    The Coast Guard received no comments in response to the NPRM. No 
public meeting was requested and none was held. Accordingly, the 
regulatory text mirrors the proposed text published in the NPRM.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on these statutes and executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as 
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and 
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential 
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or 
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and 
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
    Although this regulation would restrict access to this area, the 
effect of this proposed rule will not be significant because: (i) The 
safety zone will only be in effect from 8:30 p.m. through 10 p.m. on 
July 4, 2015, and if necessary due to inclement weather, from 8:30 p.m. 
through 10 p.m. on July 5, 2015, (ii) the Coast Guard will give advance 
notification via maritime advisories so mariners can adjust their plans 
accordingly, and (iii) although the safety zone will apply to certain 
portions of the Inner Harbor, smaller vessel traffic will be able to 
transit safely around the safety zone.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business 
Administration on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 
605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.
    This rule may affect the following entities, some of which may be 
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to operate 
or transit through or within, or anchor in, the safety zone during the 
enforcement period.
    This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities for

[[Page 36923]]

the reasons stated under paragraph D.1., Regulatory Planning and 
Review.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule affects your small 
business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, 
above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined 
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive 
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect 
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined 
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not 
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human 
environment. This rule involves establishing a temporary safety zone 
for a fireworks display. The fireworks are launched from navigable 
waters of the United States and may negatively impact the safety or 
other interests of waterway users and near shore activities in the 
event area. The activity includes fireworks launched from barges near 
the shoreline that generally rely on the use of navigable waters as a 
safety buffer to protect the public from fireworks fallouts and 
premature detonations. This action is necessary to protect persons and 
property during the project. This rule is categorically excluded from 
further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant 
Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist supporting this 
determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are available 
in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T05-0279 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.0279  Safety Zone for Fireworks Display, Chesapeake Bay, 
Prospect Bay; Queen Anne's County, MD.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: (1) All waters 
of Prospect Bay, within a 1,000 feet radius of a fireworks discharge 
barge in approximate position latitude 39[deg]57'49.8'' N., longitude 
076[deg]14'58.5'' W., located between Hog Island and Kent Island in 
Queen Anne's County, MD. All coordinates refer to datum NAD 1983.
    (b) Regulations. The general safety zone regulations found in 33 
CFR 165.23 apply to the safety zone created

[[Page 36924]]

by this temporary section, Sec.  165.T05.0279.
    (1) All persons are required to comply with the general regulations 
governing safety zones found in 33 CFR 165.23.
    (2) Entry into or remaining in this zone is prohibited unless 
authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Baltimore. All 
vessels underway within this safety zone at the time it is implemented 
are to depart the zone.
    (3) Persons desiring to transit the area of the safety zone must 
first obtain authorization from the Captain of the Port Baltimore or 
his designated representative. To seek permission to transit the area, 
the Captain of the Port Baltimore and his designated representatives 
can be contacted at telephone number 410-576-2693 or on Marine Band 
Radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard vessels enforcing 
this section can be contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF-FM channel 16 
(156.8 MHz). Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel, or other 
Federal, State, or local agency vessel, by siren, radio, flashing 
light, or other means, the operator of a vessel shall proceed as 
directed. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply 
with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Baltimore or his 
designated representative and proceed as directed while within the 
zone.
    (4) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol 
and enforcement of the zone by Federal, State, and local agencies.
    (c) Definitions. As used in this section:
    Captain of the Port Baltimore means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard 
Sector Baltimore, Maryland.
    Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned, 
warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the 
Port Baltimore to assist in enforcing the safety zone described in 
paragraph (a) of this section.
    (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 8:30 
p.m. through 10 p.m. on July 4, 2015, and if necessary due to inclement 
weather, from 8:30 p.m. through 10 p.m. on July 5, 2015.

    Dated: June 12, 2015.
Kevin C. Kiefer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2015-15759 Filed 6-26-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 124 / Monday, June 29, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 36923

the reasons stated under paragraph D.1., their discretionary regulatory actions. In Environmental Policy Act of 1969
Regulatory Planning and Review. particular, the Act addresses actions (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
that may result in the expenditure by a have determined that this action is one
3. Assistance for Small Entities
State, local, or tribal government, in the of a category of actions that do not
Under section 213(a) of the Small aggregate, or by the private sector of individually or cumulatively have a
Business Regulatory Enforcement $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or significant effect on the human
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), more in any one year. Though this rule environment. This rule involves
we want to assist small entities in will not result in such an expenditure, establishing a temporary safety zone for
understanding this rule. If the rule we do discuss the effects of this rule a fireworks display. The fireworks are
affects your small business, elsewhere in this preamble. launched from navigable waters of the
organization, or governmental United States and may negatively
jurisdiction and you have questions 8. Taking of Private Property
impact the safety or other interests of
concerning its provisions or options for This rule will not cause a taking of waterway users and near shore activities
compliance, please contact the person private property or otherwise have in the event area. The activity includes
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION taking implications under Executive fireworks launched from barges near the
CONTACT, above. Order 12630, Governmental Actions and shoreline that generally rely on the use
Small businesses may send comments Interference with Constitutionally of navigable waters as a safety buffer to
on the actions of Federal employees Protected Property Rights. protect the public from fireworks
who enforce, or otherwise determine fallouts and premature detonations.
compliance with, Federal regulations to 9. Civil Justice Reform
This action is necessary to protect
the Small Business and Agriculture This rule meets applicable standards persons and property during the project.
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive This rule is categorically excluded from
and the Regional Small Business Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The minimize litigation, eliminate Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Ombudsman evaluates these actions ambiguity, and reduce burden. Instruction. An environmental analysis
annually and rates each agency’s checklist supporting this determination
10. Protection of Children
responsiveness to small business. If you and a Categorical Exclusion
wish to comment on actions by We have analyzed this rule under Determination are available in the
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– Executive Order 13045, Protection of docket where indicated under
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Children from Environmental Health ADDRESSES.
Coast Guard will not retaliate against Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
small entities that question or complain an economically significant rule and List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
about this rule or any policy or action does not create an environmental risk to Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
of the Coast Guard. health or risk to safety that may (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
disproportionately affect children. requirements, Security measures,
4. Collection of Information
11. Indian Tribal Governments Waterways.
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the This rule does not have tribal For the reasons discussed in the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 implications under Executive Order preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
U.S.C. 3501–3520). 13175, Consultation and Coordination CFR part 165 as follows:
with Indian Tribal Governments,
5. Federalism PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
because it does not have a substantial
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
A rule has implications for federalism direct effect on one or more Indian
under Executive Order 13132, tribes, on the relationship between the ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct Federal Government and Indian tribes, continues to read as follows:
effect on the States, on the relationship or on the distribution of power and
between the national government and responsibilities between the Federal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
the States, or on the distribution of Government and Indian tribes. Department of Homeland Security Delegation
power and responsibilities among the No. 0170.1.
12. Energy Effects
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and This action is not a ‘‘significant ■ 2. Add § 165.T05–0279 to read as
determined that this rule does not have energy action’’ under Executive Order follows:
implications for federalism. 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, § 165.0279 Safety Zone for Fireworks
6. Protest Activities Distribution, or Use. Display, Chesapeake Bay, Prospect Bay;
Queen Anne’s County, MD.
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters. 13. Technical Standards (a) Location. The following area is a
Protesters are asked to contact the This rule does not use technical safety zone: (1) All waters of Prospect
person listed in the FOR FURTHER standards. Therefore, we did not Bay, within a 1,000 feet radius of a
INFORMATION CONTACT section to consider the use of voluntary consensus fireworks discharge barge in
coordinate protest activities so that your standards. approximate position latitude
message can be received without 39°57′49.8″ N., longitude 076°14′58.5″
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

14. Environment W., located between Hog Island and
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels. We have analyzed this rule under Kent Island in Queen Anne’s County,
Department of Homeland Security MD. All coordinates refer to datum NAD
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Management Directive 023–01 and 1983.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, (b) Regulations. The general safety
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires which guide the Coast Guard in zone regulations found in 33 CFR
Federal agencies to assess the effects of complying with the National 165.23 apply to the safety zone created

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:11 Jun 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\29JNR1.SGM 29JNR1

Document Created: 2015-12-15 14:24:45
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 14:24:45

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective from 8:30 p.m. on July 4, 2015 through 10 p.m. on July 5, 2015.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Mr. Ronald Houck, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, MD; telephone 410-576-2674, email [email protected] If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
FR Citation		80 FR 36922
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

80 FR 36922 - Safety Zone for Fireworks Display, Chesapeake Bay, Prospect Bay; Queen Anne's County, MD

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 124 (June 29, 2015)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard