80 FR 36971 - Certain Uncoated Paper From Indonesia: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Determination
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 124 (June 29, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 124 (June 29, 2015)
| Page Range | 36971-36973 | |
| FR Document | 2015-15901 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 36971-36973] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-15901] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C-560-829] Certain Uncoated Paper From Indonesia: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Determination AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and/or exporters of certain uncoated paper from Indonesia. The period of investigation is January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. DATES: Effective Date: June 29, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Goldberger or Kate Johnson, Office II, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 4136 and (202) 482-4929, respectively. Alignment of Final Countervailing Duty (CVD) Determination With Final Antidumping Duty (AD) Determination On the same day that the Department initiated this CVD investigation, the Department also initiated a CVD investigation of certain uncoated paper from the People's Republic of China (PRC) and AD investigations of certain uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil, the PRC, Indonesia, and Portugal.\1\ The AD and CVD investigations cover the same merchandise. On June 17, 2015, in accordance with section 705(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(4)(i), the petitioners \2\ requested alignment of the final CVD determination with the final AD determination of certain uncoated [[Page 36972]] paper from Indonesia.\3\ Therefore, in accordance with section 705(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(4)(i), we are aligning the final CVD determination with the final AD determination. Consequently, the final CVD determination will be issued on the same date as the final AD determination, which is currently scheduled to be issued no later than November 2, 2015, unless postponed. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Certain Uncoated Paper From the People's Republic of China and Indonesia: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations, 80 FR 8598 (February 18, 2015); and Certain Uncoated Paper From Australia, Brazil, the People's Republic of China, Indonesia, and Portugal: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 80 FR 8608 (February 18, 2015). \2\ The petitioners are United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union; Domtar Corporation; Finch Paper LLC; P.H. Glatfelter Company; and Packaging Corporation of America. \3\ See Letter from the petitioners regarding ``Petitioners' Request for Alignment of Countervailing Duty Investigation Final Determination Deadline with Antidumping Investigation Final Determination Deadline'' (June 17, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Investigation The product covered by this investigation is certain uncoated paper from Indonesia. For a complete description of the scope of the investigation, see Appendix 1 to this notice. Methodology The Department is conducting this CVD investigation in accordance with section 701 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our preliminary conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\4\ A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix 2 to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance regarding ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain Uncoated Paper from Indonesia,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For this preliminary determination, we relied on facts available pursuant to section 776(a) of the Act because certain companies selected for individual examination--Great Champ Trading Limited (Great Champ), Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper TBK (IK), and Pabrik Kertas Tjiwi Kimia (TK)--failed to provide information requested by the Department within the deadlines established and, by refusing to participate as respondents, significantly impeded the investigation.5 In addition, the Government of Indonesia (GOI) did not provide requested information with respect to certain programs upon which we initiated an investigation, thereby also resulting in the Department's reliance on facts otherwise available, pursuant to section 776(a). Because the GOI did not provide the information requested for certain programs, with respect to those programs, we drew an adverse inference that these programs provide a financial contribution and are specific, pursuant to sections 771(5)(D) and 771(5A) of the Act. Because Great Champ, IK, and TK failed to cooperate by not acting to the best of their ability to respond to the Department's requests for necessary information, pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act, in selecting from among the facts otherwise available, we drew an adverse inference that these programs confer a benefit. Therefore, the Department applied an adverse inference in its calculation of the ad valorem estimated countervailable subsidy rate for Great Champ, IK, and TK. For further information, see ``Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences'' section in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Preliminary Determination and Suspension of Liquidation In accordance with section 703(d)(1)(A)(i) of the Act, we calculated a CVD rate for each individually investigated producer/ exporter of the subject merchandise. In accordance with sections 703(d) and 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, for companies not individually investigated, we apply an ``all-others'' rate equal to the weighted- average countervailable subsidy rates established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero and de minimis countervailable subsidy rates, and any rates determined entirely under section 776 of the Act. Therefore, we used the rate calculated for our sole cooperating respondent as the all-others rate. We preliminarily determine the countervailable subsidy rates to be: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subsidy rate Company (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ APRIL Fine Paper Macao Commercial Offshore Limited, PT 43.19 Anugrah Kertas Utama, PT Riau Andalan Kertas, PT Intiguna Primatama, PT Riau Andalan Pulp & Paper, PT Esensindo Cipta Cemerlang.............................. Great Champ Trading Limited............................. 125.97 Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper TBK, Pabrik Kertas Tjiwi Kimia.. \6\ 131.12 All Others.............................................. 43.19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ In accordance with sections 703(d)(1)(B) and (d)(2) of the Act, we are directing U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of all entries of certain uncoated paper from Indonesia that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of the publication of this notice in the Federal Register, and to require a cash deposit for such entries of merchandise in the amounts indicated above. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See sections 776(a)(2)(A)(B), and (C) of the Act. \6\ We are also assigning to PT Pindo Deli Pulp and Paper Mills the rate assigned to IK and TK. For further discussion, see the Memorandum to the File, ``Cross-Ownership: Countervailing Duty Investigation of Uncoated Paper from Indonesia,'' dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Verification As provided in section 782(i)(1) of the Act, we intend to verify the information submitted by the respondent prior to making our final determination. Disclosure and Public Comment The Department intends to disclose to interested parties the calculations performed in connection with this preliminary determination within five days of its public announcement.\7\ Interested parties may submit case and rebuttal briefs. For a schedule of the deadlines for filing case briefs, rebuttal briefs, and hearing requests, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) Notification In accordance with section 703(f) of the Act, we will notify the ITC of our determination. In addition, we are making available to the ITC all non-privileged and non-proprietary information relating to this investigation. We will allow the ITC access to all privileged and business proprietary information in our files, provided the ITC confirms that it will not disclose such information, either [[Page 36973]] publicly or under an administrative protective order, without the written consent of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. In accordance with section 705(b)(2) of the Act, if our final determination is affirmative, the ITC will make its final determination within 45 days after the Department makes its final determination. This determination is issued and published pursuant to sections 703(f) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: June 22, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix 1--Scope of the Investigation The merchandise covered by this investigation includes uncoated paper in sheet form; weighing at least 40 grams per square meter but not more than 150 grams per square meter; that either is a white paper with a GE brightness level \1\ of 85 or higher or is a colored paper; whether or not surface-decorated, printed (except as described below), embossed, perforated, or punched; irrespective of the smoothness of the surface; and irrespective of dimensions (Certain Uncoated Paper). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ One of the key measurements of any grade of paper is brightness. Generally speaking, the brighter the paper the better the contrast between the paper and the ink. Brightness is measured using a GE Reflectance Scale, which measures the reflection of light off a grade of paper. One is the lowest reflection, or what would be given to a totally black grade, and 100 is the brightest measured grade. ``Colored paper'' as used in this scope definition means a paper with a hue other than white that reflects one of the primary colors of magenta, yellow, and cyan (red, yellow, and blue) or a combination of such primary colors. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Certain Uncoated Paper includes (a) uncoated free sheet paper that meets this scope definition; (b) uncoated groundwood paper produced from bleached chemi-thermo-mechanical pulp (BCTMP) that meets this scope definition; and (c) any other uncoated paper that meets this scope definition regardless of the type of pulp used to produce the paper. Specifically excluded from the scope are (1) paper printed with final content of printed text or graphics and (2) lined paper products, typically school supplies, composed of paper that incorporates straight horizontal and/or vertical lines that would make the paper unsuitable for copying or printing purposes. Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) categories 4802.56.1000, 4802.56.2000, 4802.56.3000, 4802.56.4000, 4802.56.6000, 4802.56.7020, 4802.56.7040, 4802.57.1000, 4802.57.2000, 4802.57.3000, and 4802.57.4000. Some imports of subject merchandise may also be classified under 4802.62.1000, 4802.62.2000, 4802.62.3000, 4802.62.5000, 4802.62.6020, 4802.62.6040, 4802.69.1000, 4802.69.2000, 4802.69.3000, 4811.90.8050 and 4811.90.9080. While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the investigation is dispositive. Appendix 2--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Alignment 4. Scope Comments 5. Scope of the Investigation 6. Injury Test 7. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inference 8. Subsidies Valuation 9. Analysis of Programs 10. ITC Notification 11. Disclosure and Public Comment 12. Verification 13. Conclusion [FR Doc. 2015-15901 Filed 6-26-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 124 / Monday, June 29, 2015 / Notices 36971
Nam Phuong’s and NTACO’s sales and the Vietnam-wide rate (i.e., 2.39 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
preliminarily found them to be non- Dollars/kg); (2) for subject merchandise
bona fide.5 Based on the Department’s exported by Nam Phuong or NTACO but International Trade Administration
complete analysis of all the information not manufactured by Nam Phuong or [C–560–829]
and comments on the record of this NTACO, the cash deposit rate will
review, the Department continues to continue to be the Vietnam-wide rate Certain Uncoated Paper From
find their sales to be non-bona fide. (i.e., 2.39 U.S. Dollars/kg); and (3) for Indonesia: Preliminary Affirmative
With respect to both Nam Phuong and subject merchandise manufactured by Countervailing Duty Determination and
NTACO, the Department reached this Nam Phuong or NTACO, but exported Alignment of Final Determination With
conclusion based on the totality of Final Antidumping Determination
by any other party, the cash deposit rate
circumstances, namely: (a) The atypical
will be the rate applicable to the AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
nature of their prices; (b) the atypical
involvement of other entities in the sale; exporter. These cash deposit International Trade Administration,
(c) atypical circumstances surrounding requirements shall remain in effect until Department of Commerce.
production; (d) late payment; and (e) further notice. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
lack of profit on the resale of subject Administrative Protective Order (the Department) preliminarily
merchandise.6 For a complete determines that countervailable
discussion, see the I&D Memo and each This notice also serves as a reminder subsidies are being provided to
company’s Final Bona Fide to parties subject to Administrative producers and/or exporters of certain
Memorandum.7 Protective Order (‘‘APO’’) of their uncoated paper from Indonesia. The
responsibility concerning the return or period of investigation is January 1,
Rescission of New Shipper Review 2014, through December 31, 2014.
destruction of proprietary information
For the foregoing reasons, the disclosed under APO in accordance Interested parties are invited to
Department finds that Nam Phuong’s comment on this preliminary
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
and NTACO’s sales are non-bona fide determination.
to govern business proprietary
and that these sales do not provide a DATES: Effective Date: June 29, 2015.
reasonable or reliable basis for information in these segments of the
proceeding. Timely written notification FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
calculating a dumping margin. Because
of the return or destruction of APO David Goldberger or Kate Johnson,
these non-bona fide sales were the only
materials, or conversion to judicial Office II, AD/CVD Operations,
sales of subject merchandise during the
protective order, is hereby requested. Enforcement and Compliance,
POR, the Department is rescinding this
Failure to comply with the regulations International Trade Administration,
NSR pursuant to section 19 CFR
and terms of an APO is a violation U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
351.214(f).
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
which is subject to sanction.
Cash Deposit Rates Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
We are issuing and publishing this 482–4136 and (202) 482–4929,
The following cash deposit
notice in accordance with sections respectively.
requirements continue to apply for all
751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act
shipment of subject merchandise from Alignment of Final Countervailing Duty
Nam Phuong and NTACO entered, or of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR
(CVD) Determination With Final
withdrawn from warehouse: (1) For 351.214.
Antidumping Duty (AD) Determination
subject merchandise produced and Dated: June 18, 2015.
On the same day that the Department
exported by Nam Phuong or NTACO, Paul Piquado, initiated this CVD investigation, the
the cash deposit rate will continue to be Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Department also initiated a CVD
Compliance. investigation of certain uncoated paper
5 See ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review: Appendix—Issues and Decision from the People’s Republic of China
Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist (PRC) and AD investigations of certain
Republic of Vietnam’’ from Gary Taverman,
Memorandum
uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations
Summary the PRC, Indonesia, and Portugal.1 The
to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Background AD and CVD investigations cover the
Enforcement and Compliance, dated January 20, Scope of the Order same merchandise. On June 17, 2015, in
2015 (‘‘Preliminary Decision Memorandum’’), and Discussion of the Issues accordance with section 705(a)(1) of the
hereby adopted by this notice. Comment 1: Commerce’s Bona Fide Analysis
6 See I&D Memo.
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act)
7 See Memorandum to James Doyle, Director,
for Nam Phuong and NTACO and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(4)(i), the
Office V, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Comment 2: Surrogate Country Selection petitioners 2 requested alignment of the
Operations, through Scot T. Fullerton, Program Recommendation final CVD determination with the final
Manager, Office V, Antidumping and [FR Doc. 2015–15894 Filed 6–26–15; 8:45 am] AD determination of certain uncoated
Countervailing Duty Operations, from Matthew
Renkey, Senior International Trade Analyst ‘‘New BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
1 See Certain Uncoated Paper From the People’s
Shipper Review of Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from
the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Analysis Republic of China and Indonesia: Initiation of
for the Bona Fide Nature of Nam Phuong Seafood Countervailing Duty Investigations, 80 FR 8598
Co., Ltd.’s Sale,’’ dated June 19, 2015; see also (February 18, 2015); and Certain Uncoated Paper
Memorandum to James Doyle, Director, Office V, From Australia, Brazil, the People’s Republic of
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, China, Indonesia, and Portugal: Initiation of Less-
through Scot T. Fullerton, Program Manager, Office Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 80 FR 8608
V, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty (February 18, 2015).
Operations, from Susan Pulongbarit, Senior 2 The petitioners are United Steel, Paper and
International Trade Analyst ‘‘New Shipper Review Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied
of Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Industrial and Service Workers International Union;
Republic of Vietnam: Final Analysis for the Bona Domtar Corporation; Finch Paper LLC; P.H.
Fide Nature of NTACO Corporations’s Sale,’’ dated Glatfelter Company; and Packaging Corporation of
June 19, 2015. America.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:13 Jun 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM 29JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_37095/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 124 / Monday, June 29, 2015 / Notices 36973
publicly or under an administrative HTSUS subheadings are provided for Background
protective order, without the written convenience and customs purposes, the
consent of the Assistant Secretary for written description of the scope of the On June 1, 2015, the Department
Enforcement and Compliance. investigation is dispositive. received an adequate substantive
In accordance with section 705(b)(2) response from domestic interested party
Appendix 2—List of Topics Discussed
of the Act, if our final determination is Chemical Products Corporation
in the Preliminary Decision
affirmative, the ITC will make its final (‘‘Petitioner’’) within the deadline
Memorandum
determination within 45 days after the specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).2
Department makes its final 1. Summary We received no responses from
2. Background respondent interested parties. As a
determination. 3. Alignment
This determination is issued and result, the Department conducted an
4. Scope Comments expedited (120-day) sunset review of the
published pursuant to sections 703(f) 5. Scope of the Investigation
and 777(i) of the Act. 6. Injury Test
order, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of
7. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and the Act and 19 CFR
Dated: June 22, 2015.
Adverse Inference 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2).
Paul Piquado,
8. Subsidies Valuation Analysis of Comments Received
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 9. Analysis of Programs
Compliance. 10. ITC Notification All issues raised in this sunset review
Appendix 1—Scope of the Investigation 11. Disclosure and Public Comment are addressed in the ‘‘Issues and
12. Verification Decision Memorandum for the
The merchandise covered by this 13. Conclusion
investigation includes uncoated paper in Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the
[FR Doc. 2015–15901 Filed 6–26–15; 8:45 am] Antidumping Duty Order on Barium
sheet form; weighing at least 40 grams per
square meter but not more than 150 grams BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Chloride from the People’s Republic of
per square meter; that either is a white paper China’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy
with a GE brightness level 1 of 85 or higher Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
or is a colored paper; whether or not surface- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
decorated, printed (except as described Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
below), embossed, perforated, or punched; International Trade Administration
Enforcement and Compliance, dated
irrespective of the smoothness of the surface;
and irrespective of dimensions (Certain concurrently with, and hereby adopted
[A–570–007] by, this notice (‘‘Decision
Uncoated Paper).
Certain Uncoated Paper includes (a) Memorandum’’). The issues discussed
Barium Chloride From the People’s
uncoated free sheet paper that meets this in the Decision Memorandum include
scope definition; (b) uncoated groundwood Republic of China: Final Results of
the likelihood of continuation or
paper produced from bleached chemi- Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the
recurrence of dumping and the
thermo-mechanical pulp (BCTMP) that meets Antidumping Duty Order
magnitude of the margins likely to
this scope definition; and (c) any other
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, prevail if the order were to be revoked.
uncoated paper that meets this scope
definition regardless of the type of pulp used International Trade Administration, Parties may find a complete discussion
to produce the paper. Department of Commerce. of all issues raised in the review and the
Specifically excluded from the scope are corresponding recommendations in this
(1) paper printed with final content of SUMMARY: On May 1, 2015, the public memorandum which is on file
printed text or graphics and (2) lined paper Department of Commerce (the electronically via Enforcement and
products, typically school supplies, ‘‘Department’’) initiated the fourth five- Compliance’s Antidumping and
composed of paper that incorporates straight year (‘‘sunset’’) review of the Countervailing Duty Centralized
horizontal and/or vertical lines that would antidumping duty order on barium Electronic Services System (‘‘ACCESS’’).
make the paper unsuitable for copying or chloride from the People’s Republic of
printing purposes. Access to ACCESS is available to
China (‘‘PRC’’) pursuant to section registered users at http://
Imports of the subject merchandise are 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
provided for under Harmonized Tariff access.trade.gov and is available to all
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
amended (the ‘‘Act’’).1 As a result of this parties in the Central Records Unit,
categories 4802.56.1000, 4802.56.2000, sunset review, the Department finds that Room B8024 of the main Department of
4802.56.3000, 4802.56.4000, 4802.56.6000, revocation of the antidumping duty Commerce building. In addition, a
4802.56.7020, 4802.56.7040, 4802.57.1000, order on barium chloride from the PRC complete version of the Decision
4802.57.2000, 4802.57.3000, and would be likely to lead to continuation Memorandum is available directly on
4802.57.4000. Some imports of subject or recurrence of dumping at the levels
merchandise may also be classified under
the Web at http://
indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
4802.62.1000, 4802.62.2000, 4802.62.3000, Review’’ section of this notice.
4802.62.5000, 4802.62.6020, 4802.62.6040, The signed Decision Memorandum and
4802.69.1000, 4802.69.2000, 4802.69.3000, DATES: Effective Date: June 29, 2015. the electronic versions of the Decision
4811.90.8050 and 4811.90.9080. While FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Memorandum are identical in content.
1 One of the key measurements of any grade of
Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, Scope of the Order
paper is brightness. Generally speaking, the brighter
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, The merchandise covered by the order
the paper the better the contrast between the paper
and the ink. Brightness is measured using a GE U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th is barium chloride, a chemical
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Reflectance Scale, which measures the reflection of Street and Constitution Avenue NW., compound having the formulas BaCl2 or
light off a grade of paper. One is the lowest
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) BaCl2–2H2O, currently classifiable
reflection, or what would be given to a totally black under item number 2827.39.45.00 of the
grade, and 100 is the brightest measured grade. 482–6905.
‘‘Colored paper’’ as used in this scope definition SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
means a paper with a hue other than white that 2 See Petitioner’s June 1, 2015, submission, re;
reflects one of the primary colors of magenta, ‘‘Substantive Response to the Notice of Initiation of
yellow, and cyan (red, yellow, and blue) or a 1 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 80 Five-Year Review of Chemical Products
combination of such primary colors. FR 24900 (May 1, 2015). Corporation.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:13 Jun 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM 29JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_37095/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 14:25:09
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 14:25:09
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | David Goldberger or Kate Johnson, Office II, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 4136 and (202) 482-4929, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 36971 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR