80_FR_37097 80 FR 36973 - Barium Chloride From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order

80 FR 36973 - Barium Chloride From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 124 (June 29, 2015)

Page Range36973-36974
FR Document2015-15903

On May 1, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the ``Department'') initiated the fourth five-year (``sunset'') review of the antidumping duty order on barium chloride from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ``Act'').\1\ As a result of this sunset review, the Department finds that revocation of the antidumping duty order on barium chloride from the PRC would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 124 (Monday, June 29, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36973-36974]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15903]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-007]


Barium Chloride From the People's Republic of China: Final 
Results of Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On May 1, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the 
``Department'') initiated the fourth five-year (``sunset'') review of 
the antidumping duty order on barium chloride from the People's 
Republic of China (``PRC'') pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 
Act of 1930, as amended (the ``Act'').\1\ As a result of this sunset 
review, the Department finds that revocation of the antidumping duty 
order on barium chloride from the PRC would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the 
``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 80 FR 24900 
(May 1, 2015).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: June 29, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, 
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6905.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On June 1, 2015, the Department received an adequate substantive 
response from domestic interested party Chemical Products Corporation 
(``Petitioner'') within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 
351.218(d)(3)(i).\2\ We received no responses from respondent 
interested parties. As a result, the Department conducted an expedited 
(120-day) sunset review of the order, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) 
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Petitioner's June 1, 2015, submission, re; ``Substantive 
Response to the Notice of Initiation of Five-Year Review of Chemical 
Products Corporation.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in the 
``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Fourth Sunset Review 
of the Antidumping Duty Order on Barium Chloride from the People's 
Republic of China'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary 
for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently 
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (``Decision Memorandum''). The 
issues discussed in the Decision Memorandum include the likelihood of 
continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins 
likely to prevail if the order were to be revoked. Parties may find a 
complete discussion of all issues raised in the review and the 
corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum which is on 
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System 
(``ACCESS''). Access to ACCESS is available to registered users at 
http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central 
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. 
In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum is available 
directly on the Web at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The 
signed Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Decision 
Memorandum are identical in content.

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the order is barium chloride, a chemical 
compound having the formulas BaCl2 or BaCl2-2H2O, currently 
classifiable under item number 2827.39.45.00 of the

[[Page 36974]]

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'').\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The scope reflects the HTSUS item number currently in 
effect. The full scope of the order is provided in the Decision 
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Review

    Pursuant to section 752(c) of the Act, we determine that revocation 
of the antidumping duty order on barium chloride from the PRC would be 
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at weighted 
average margins up to 155.50 percent.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely 
notification of the return of destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is 
subject to sanction.
    This sunset review and notice are in accordance with sections 
751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: June 23, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-15903 Filed 6-26-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                                                                 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 124 / Monday, June 29, 2015 / Notices                                                          36973

                                                  publicly or under an administrative                     HTSUS subheadings are provided for                        Background
                                                  protective order, without the written                   convenience and customs purposes, the
                                                  consent of the Assistant Secretary for                  written description of the scope of the                      On June 1, 2015, the Department
                                                  Enforcement and Compliance.                             investigation is dispositive.                             received an adequate substantive
                                                     In accordance with section 705(b)(2)                                                                           response from domestic interested party
                                                                                                          Appendix 2—List of Topics Discussed
                                                  of the Act, if our final determination is                                                                         Chemical Products Corporation
                                                                                                          in the Preliminary Decision
                                                  affirmative, the ITC will make its final                                                                          (‘‘Petitioner’’) within the deadline
                                                                                                          Memorandum
                                                  determination within 45 days after the                                                                            specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).2
                                                  Department makes its final                              1. Summary                                                We received no responses from
                                                                                                          2. Background                                             respondent interested parties. As a
                                                  determination.                                          3. Alignment
                                                     This determination is issued and                                                                               result, the Department conducted an
                                                                                                          4. Scope Comments                                         expedited (120-day) sunset review of the
                                                  published pursuant to sections 703(f)                   5. Scope of the Investigation
                                                  and 777(i) of the Act.                                  6. Injury Test
                                                                                                                                                                    order, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of
                                                                                                          7. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and                   the Act and 19 CFR
                                                    Dated: June 22, 2015.
                                                                                                               Adverse Inference                                    351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2).
                                                  Paul Piquado,
                                                                                                          8. Subsidies Valuation                                    Analysis of Comments Received
                                                  Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and                 9. Analysis of Programs
                                                  Compliance.                                             10. ITC Notification                                        All issues raised in this sunset review
                                                  Appendix 1—Scope of the Investigation                   11. Disclosure and Public Comment                         are addressed in the ‘‘Issues and
                                                                                                          12. Verification                                          Decision Memorandum for the
                                                     The merchandise covered by this                      13. Conclusion
                                                  investigation includes uncoated paper in                                                                          Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the
                                                                                                          [FR Doc. 2015–15901 Filed 6–26–15; 8:45 am]               Antidumping Duty Order on Barium
                                                  sheet form; weighing at least 40 grams per
                                                  square meter but not more than 150 grams                BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P                                    Chloride from the People’s Republic of
                                                  per square meter; that either is a white paper                                                                    China’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy
                                                  with a GE brightness level 1 of 85 or higher                                                                      Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
                                                  or is a colored paper; whether or not surface-          DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                    and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
                                                  decorated, printed (except as described                                                                           Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
                                                  below), embossed, perforated, or punched;               International Trade Administration
                                                                                                                                                                    Enforcement and Compliance, dated
                                                  irrespective of the smoothness of the surface;
                                                  and irrespective of dimensions (Certain                                                                           concurrently with, and hereby adopted
                                                                                                          [A–570–007]                                               by, this notice (‘‘Decision
                                                  Uncoated Paper).
                                                     Certain Uncoated Paper includes (a)                                                                            Memorandum’’). The issues discussed
                                                                                                          Barium Chloride From the People’s
                                                  uncoated free sheet paper that meets this                                                                         in the Decision Memorandum include
                                                  scope definition; (b) uncoated groundwood               Republic of China: Final Results of
                                                                                                                                                                    the likelihood of continuation or
                                                  paper produced from bleached chemi-                     Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the
                                                                                                                                                                    recurrence of dumping and the
                                                  thermo-mechanical pulp (BCTMP) that meets               Antidumping Duty Order
                                                                                                                                                                    magnitude of the margins likely to
                                                  this scope definition; and (c) any other
                                                                                                          AGENCY:  Enforcement and Compliance,                      prevail if the order were to be revoked.
                                                  uncoated paper that meets this scope
                                                  definition regardless of the type of pulp used          International Trade Administration,                       Parties may find a complete discussion
                                                  to produce the paper.                                   Department of Commerce.                                   of all issues raised in the review and the
                                                     Specifically excluded from the scope are                                                                       corresponding recommendations in this
                                                  (1) paper printed with final content of                 SUMMARY:   On May 1, 2015, the                            public memorandum which is on file
                                                  printed text or graphics and (2) lined paper            Department of Commerce (the                               electronically via Enforcement and
                                                  products, typically school supplies,                    ‘‘Department’’) initiated the fourth five-                Compliance’s Antidumping and
                                                  composed of paper that incorporates straight            year (‘‘sunset’’) review of the                           Countervailing Duty Centralized
                                                  horizontal and/or vertical lines that would             antidumping duty order on barium                          Electronic Services System (‘‘ACCESS’’).
                                                  make the paper unsuitable for copying or                chloride from the People’s Republic of
                                                  printing purposes.                                                                                                Access to ACCESS is available to
                                                                                                          China (‘‘PRC’’) pursuant to section                       registered users at http://
                                                     Imports of the subject merchandise are               751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
                                                  provided for under Harmonized Tariff                                                                              access.trade.gov and is available to all
                                                  Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
                                                                                                          amended (the ‘‘Act’’).1 As a result of this               parties in the Central Records Unit,
                                                  categories 4802.56.1000, 4802.56.2000,                  sunset review, the Department finds that                  Room B8024 of the main Department of
                                                  4802.56.3000, 4802.56.4000, 4802.56.6000,               revocation of the antidumping duty                        Commerce building. In addition, a
                                                  4802.56.7020, 4802.56.7040, 4802.57.1000,               order on barium chloride from the PRC                     complete version of the Decision
                                                  4802.57.2000, 4802.57.3000, and                         would be likely to lead to continuation                   Memorandum is available directly on
                                                  4802.57.4000. Some imports of subject                   or recurrence of dumping at the levels
                                                  merchandise may also be classified under
                                                                                                                                                                    the Web at http://
                                                                                                          indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of                       enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
                                                  4802.62.1000, 4802.62.2000, 4802.62.3000,               Review’’ section of this notice.
                                                  4802.62.5000, 4802.62.6020, 4802.62.6040,                                                                         The signed Decision Memorandum and
                                                  4802.69.1000, 4802.69.2000, 4802.69.3000,               DATES:   Effective Date: June 29, 2015.                   the electronic versions of the Decision
                                                  4811.90.8050 and 4811.90.9080. While                    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                          Memorandum are identical in content.
                                                     1 One of the key measurements of any grade of
                                                                                                          Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations,                         Scope of the Order
                                                  paper is brightness. Generally speaking, the brighter
                                                                                                          Enforcement and Compliance,
                                                                                                          International Trade Administration,                          The merchandise covered by the order
                                                  the paper the better the contrast between the paper
                                                  and the ink. Brightness is measured using a GE          U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th                         is barium chloride, a chemical
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                  Reflectance Scale, which measures the reflection of     Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,                       compound having the formulas BaCl2 or
                                                  light off a grade of paper. One is the lowest
                                                                                                          Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)                    BaCl2–2H2O, currently classifiable
                                                  reflection, or what would be given to a totally black                                                             under item number 2827.39.45.00 of the
                                                  grade, and 100 is the brightest measured grade.         482–6905.
                                                  ‘‘Colored paper’’ as used in this scope definition      SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                  means a paper with a hue other than white that                                                                       2 See Petitioner’s June 1, 2015, submission, re;

                                                  reflects one of the primary colors of magenta,                                                                    ‘‘Substantive Response to the Notice of Initiation of
                                                  yellow, and cyan (red, yellow, and blue) or a             1 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 80   Five-Year Review of Chemical Products
                                                  combination of such primary colors.                     FR 24900 (May 1, 2015).                                   Corporation.’’



                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:13 Jun 26, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00013   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM      29JNN1


                                                  36974                            Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 124 / Monday, June 29, 2015 / Notices

                                                  Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the                          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                       selectivity patterns using the same
                                                  United States (‘‘HTSUS’’).3                                Andrew Rubin or Karyl Brewster-Geisz                   methods as in previous HMS shark
                                                                                                             by phone at 301–427–8503.                              assessment.
                                                  Final Results of Review                                                                                              Two selectivity patterns were
                                                                                                             SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                    Pursuant to section 752(c) of the Act,                                                                          explored for the main targeted gillnet
                                                  we determine that revocation of the                        Background                                             fishery (dome-shaped and asymptotic).
                                                  antidumping duty order on barium                              Atlantic smooth dogfish, Florida                    The use of these two selectivity patterns
                                                  chloride from the PRC would be likely                      smoothhound, and Gulf smoothhound                      resulted in two alternative base model
                                                  to lead to continuation or recurrence of                   sharks are managed under the authority                 configurations being evaluated. Based
                                                  dumping at weighted average margins                        of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery                        on diagnostic results, the scientists
                                                  up to 155.50 percent.                                      Conservation and Management Act.                       recommended that the dome-shaped
                                                  Administrative Protective Order                            NMFS manages all shark species, except                 functional form be selected as the base
                                                                                                             for spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias),                 model. The peer reviewers found this
                                                    This notice also serves as the only                      under the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic                   base model to be an appropriate
                                                  reminder to parties subject to                             Highly Migratory Species (HMS) Fishery                 methodology.
                                                  administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’)                  Management Plan (FMP) and its                             For this base model, the stock
                                                  of their responsibility concerning the                     amendments.                                            assessment scientists explored seven
                                                  return or destruction of proprietary                          NMFS recently assessed the status of                sensitivity scenarios. All seven model
                                                  information disclosed under APO in                         these species for the first time using the             runs found that SSF in 2012 (SSF2012),
                                                  accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.                            Southeast Data, Assessment, and                        was greater than SSFMSY (SSF2012/
                                                  Timely notification of the return of                       Review (SEDAR) process. The final                      SSFMSY ranged from 1.96 to 2.81 vs.
                                                  destruction of APO materials or                            stock assessment (SEDAR 39) was                        2.29 in the base model) and that F2012
                                                  conversion to judicial protective order is                 finalized and peer reviewed in March                   was less than FMSY (F2012/FMSY ranged
                                                  hereby requested. Failure to comply                        2015.                                                  from 0.61 to 0.99 vs. 0.79 in the base
                                                  with the regulations and terms of an                          Data from tagging and genetic                       model). Projection results for the base
                                                  APO is a violation which is subject to                     research in SEDAR 39 support the                       model configuration indicated that
                                                  sanction.                                                  existence of two distinct Atlantic and                 levels of fixed removals less than or
                                                    This sunset review and notice are in                     Gulf of Mexico stocks of smooth dogfish                equal to 550 (1000s of sharks) resulted
                                                  accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c),                   separated by peninsular Florida.                       in at least a 70 percent probability of
                                                  and 777(i)(1) of the Act.                                  Therefore, smooth dogfish was treated                  maintaining SSF above SSFMSY during
                                                    Dated: June 23, 2015.                                    as two separate stocks, one in the                     the years 2013–2022. Projections for the
                                                  Paul Piquado,                                              Atlantic region and one in the Gulf of                 seven sensitivity scenarios resulted in a
                                                  Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and                    Mexico region.                                         range of fixed removals from 350 to 850
                                                  Compliance.                                                   Additionally, because smooth dogfish                (1000s of sharks) with at least a 70
                                                  [FR Doc. 2015–15903 Filed 6–26–15; 8:45 am]                are the only species of smoothhound                    percent probability of maintaining SSF
                                                  BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
                                                                                                             sharks occurring in the Atlantic region,               above SSFMSY during the years 2013–
                                                                                                             the scientists conducted a stock                       2022.
                                                                                                             assessment for only this species in the                   The peer reviewers found it is likely
                                                  DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                     Atlantic region. However, because all                  that the Atlantic smooth dogfish stock is
                                                                                                             three species occur in the Gulf of                     not overfished, and overfishing is not
                                                  National Oceanic and Atmospheric                           Mexico, and given the difficulty with                  occurring based on the base model and
                                                  Administration                                             distinguishing among and identifying                   range of associated sensitivities. The
                                                  RIN 0648–XD969                                             the individual species of smoothhound                  peer reviewers indicated that the range
                                                                                                             sharks occurring in the Gulf of Mexico                 of sensitivities appropriately captured
                                                  Stock Status Determination for Atlantic                    region, the scientists treated all three               the uncertainty regarding the states of
                                                  Highly Migratory Atlantic Smooth                           smoothhound species (smooth dogfish,                   nature and the potential implications for
                                                  Dogfish Shark and the Gulf of Mexico                       Florida smoothhound, and Gulf                          the reference points. However they
                                                  Smoothhound Sharks Complex                                 smoothhound) as a single smoothhound                   cautioned about inferences drawn about
                                                                                                             shark complex within the Gulf of                       stock status because of the level of
                                                  AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries                         Mexico region.                                         uncertainty associated with the stock-
                                                  Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and                          All documents and information                       recruitment relationship and
                                                  Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),                         regarding SEDAR 39 can be found on                     uncertainty in the catches, and noted
                                                  Commerce.                                                  the SEDAR Web page at http://                          that the fishing level for the most recent
                                                  ACTION: Notice.                                            sedarweb.org/sedar-39.                                 year is close to FMSY for some
                                                  SUMMARY:   This action serves as a notice                                                                         sensitivity runs. Overall, the peer
                                                                                                             Atlantic Region
                                                  that NMFS, on behalf of the Secretary of                                                                          reviewers determined the stock
                                                                                                                For Atlantic smooth dogfish, the                    assessment to be based on the best
                                                  Commerce (Secretary), has determined                       scientists used a length-based age-
                                                  that the Atlantic smooth dogfish shark                                                                            scientific information available. Based
                                                                                                             structured stock assessment model. This                on these results, NMFS determined that
                                                  (Mustelus canis) and the Gulf of Mexico                    was the first HMS shark stock
                                                  smoothhound shark complex, which is                                                                               the status of smooth dogfish is not
                                                                                                             assessment conducted within the                        overfished and overfishing is not
                                                  comprised of Atlantic smooth dogfish,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                             SEDAR process to utilize this type of                  occurring.
                                                  Florida smoothhound (M. norrisi), and                      modeling framework. The Atlantic
                                                  Gulf smoothhound (M.                                                                                              Gulf of Mexico Region
                                                                                                             smooth dogfish assessment
                                                  sinusmexicanus), are not overfished and
                                                                                                             implemented spawning stock fecundity                     The model structure for the Gulf of
                                                  overfishing is not occurring.
                                                                                                             (SSF), which was used as a proxy for                   Mexico smoothhound shark complex
                                                    3 The scope reflects the HTSUS item number
                                                                                                             biomass, natural mortality (M),                        was different than the Atlantic stock of
                                                  currently in effect. The full scope of the order is        steepness of the Beverton-Holt stock-                  smooth dogfish because of the need to
                                                  provided in the Decision Memorandum.                       recruitment relationship, and the                      combine life history data for all three


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014    17:13 Jun 26, 2015   Jkt 235001     PO 00000   Frm 00014   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM   29JNN1



Document Created: 2015-12-15 14:24:31
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 14:24:31
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ContactIrene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6905.
FR Citation80 FR 36973 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR