80 FR 37223 - Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the People's Republic of China, India, Italy, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 125 (June 30, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 125 (June 30, 2015)
| Page Range | 37223-37228 | |
| FR Document | 2015-16067 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 125 (Tuesday, June 30, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 37223-37228] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-16067] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C-570-027, C-533-864, C-475-833, C-580-879, C-583-857] Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the People's Republic of China, India, Italy, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective Date: June 30, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Myrna Lobo at (202) 482-2371 (the People's Republic of China, and the Republic of Korea); Matt Renkey or Jerry Huang at (202) 482-2312 and (202) 482-4047, respectively (India); Robert Palmer at (202) 482-9068 (Italy); Kristen Johnson at (202) 482- 4793 (Taiwan), AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Petitions On June 3, 2015, the Department of Commerce (Department) received countervailing duty (CVD) petitions concerning imports of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (corrosion-resistant steel) from the People's Republic of China (PRC), India, Italy, the Republic of Korea (Korea), and Taiwan, filed in proper form on behalf of United States Steel Corporation, Nucor Corporation, Steel Dynamics, Inc., ArcelorMittal USA, LLC, AK Steel Corporation, and California Steel Industries, (collectively, Petitioners). The CVD petitions were accompanied by antidumping duty (AD) petitions also concerning imports of corrosion-resistant steel from all of the above countries.\1\ Petitioners are domestic producers of corrosion-resistant steel.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See ``Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing Duties on Imports: Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the People's Republic of China, India Italy, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan,'' dated June 3, 2015 (Petitions). \2\ See Volume I of the Petitions, at I-2 and Exhibit I-1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On June 9 and 10, 2015, the Department requested information and clarification for certain areas of the Petitions.\3\ Petitioners filed responses to [[Page 37224]] these requests on June 12, 2015.\4\ In addition, Petitioners filed a new subsidy allegation with respect to Korea as an Amendment to Volume V of the petition.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Letter from the Department to Petitioners entitled ``Petition for the Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Imports of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the People's Republic of China (PRC): Supplemental Questions,'' dated June 9, 2015 (PRC Questionnaire); Letter from the Department to Petitioners entitled ``Petition for the Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Imports of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India: Supplemental Questions,'' dated June 9, 2015 (India Questionnaire); Letter from the Department to Petitioners entitled ``Petition for the Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Imports of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Italy: Supplemental Questions,'' dated June 9, 2015 (Italy Questionnaire); Letter from the Department to Petitioners entitled ``Petition for the Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Imports of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the Republic of Korea: Supplemental Questions,'' dated June 9, 2015 (Korea Questionnaire); Letter from the Department to Petitioners entitled ``Petition for the Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Imports of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan: Supplemental Questions,'' dated June 10, 2015 (Taiwan Questionnaire); Letter from the Department to Petitioners entitled ``Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing Duties on Imports of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the People's Republic of China, India, Italy, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Supplemental Questions,'' dated June 9, 2015 (General Issues Questionnaire). \4\ See Letter from Petitioners entitled ``Certain Corrosion- Resistant Steel Products from the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, India, Italy, and Taiwan: Response to the Department's June 9, 2015 Questionnaire Regarding Volume I of the Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing Duties,'' dated June 12, 2015 (General Issues Supplement); Letter from Petitioners entitled ``Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, India, Italy, and Taiwan: Response to the Department's June 9, 2015 Questionnaire Regarding Volume III of the Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing Duties,'' dated June 12, 2015 (PRC Supplement); Letter from Petitioners entitled ``Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, India, Italy, and Taiwan: Response to the Department's June 9, 2015 Questionnaire Regarding Volume VII of the Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing Duties,'' dated June 12, 2015 (India Supplement); Letter from Petitioners entitled ``Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, India, Italy, and Taiwan: Response to the Department's June 9, 2015 Questionnaire Regarding Volume IX of the Petitions for the Imposition of Countervailing Duties,'' dated June 12, 2015 (Italy Supplement); Letter from Petitioners entitled ``Certain Corrosion- Resistant Steel Products from the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, India, Italy, and Taiwan: Response to the Department's June 9, 2015 Questionnaire Regarding Volume V of the Petitions for the Imposition of Countervailing Duties,'' dated June 12, 2015 (Korea Supplement); Letter from Petitioners entitled ``Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, India, Italy, and Taiwan: Response to the Department's June 10, 2015 Questionnaire Regarding Volume XI of the Petitions for the Imposition of Countervailing Duties,'' dated June 12, 2015 (Taiwan Supplement). \5\ See Letter from Petitioners entitled ``Certain Corrosion- Resistant Steel Products from the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, India, Italy, and Taiwan: New Subsidy Allegation Amendment to Volume V of the Petitions for the Imposition of Countervailing Duties,'' dated June 12, 2015 (Korea NSA). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In accordance with section 702(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Petitioners allege that the Governments of the PRC (GOC), India (GOIn), Italy (GOIt), and Korea (GOK) and the Taiwan Authorities (TA) are providing countervailable subsidies (within the meaning of sections 701 and 771(5) of the Act) to imports of corrosion- resistant steel from the PRC, India, Italy, Korea and Taiwan, respectively, and that such imports are materially injuring, or threatening material injury to, an industry in the United States. Also, consistent with section 702(b)(1) of the Act, the Petitions are accompanied by information reasonably available to Petitioners supporting their allegations. The Department finds that Petitioners filed the Petitions on behalf of the domestic industry because Petitioners are interested parties as defined in section 771(9)(C) of the Act. The Department also finds that Petitioners demonstrated sufficient industry support with respect to the initiation of the CVD investigations that Petitioners are requesting.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See the ``Determination of Industry Support for the Petitions'' section below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Period of Investigations The period of investigations is January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ 19 CFR 351.204(b)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Investigations The product covered by these investigations is corrosion-resistant steel from the PRC, India, Italy, Korea and Taiwan. For a full description of the scope of these investigations, see the ``Scope of the Investigations'' in Appendix I of this notice. Comments on Scope of the Investigations During our review of the Petitions, the Department issued questions to, and received responses from, Petitioners pertaining to the proposed scope to ensure that the scope language in the Petitions would be an accurate reflection of the products for which the domestic industry is seeking relief.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See General Issues Questionnaire; see also General Issues Supplement. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As discussed in the preamble to the Department's regulations,\9\ we are setting aside a period for interested parties to raise issues regarding product coverage (scope). The period for scope comments is intended to provide the Department with ample opportunity to consider all comments and to consult with parties prior to the issuance of the preliminary determinations. If scope comments include factual information (see 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21)), all such factual information should be limited to public information. All such comments must be filed by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on July 13, 2015, which is 20 calendar days from the signature date of this notice. Any rebuttal comments, which may include factual information, must be filed by 5:00 p.m. ET on July 23, 2015, which is 10 calendar days after the initial comments deadline. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties; Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department requests that any factual information the parties consider relevant to the scope of the investigations be submitted during this time period. However, if a party subsequently finds that additional factual information pertaining to the scope of the investigations may be relevant, the party may contact the Department and request permission to submit the additional information. All such comments must be filed on the records of the PRC, India, Italy, Korea, and Taiwan CVD investigations, as well as the concurrent PRC, India, Italy Korea, and Taiwan AD investigations. Filing Requirements All submissions to the Department must be filed electronically using Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). An electronically-filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the time and date it is due. Documents excepted from the electronic submission requirements must be filed manually (i.e., in paper form) with Enforcement and Compliance's APO/Dockets Unit, Room 18022, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, and stamped with the date and time of receipt by the applicable deadlines. Consultations Pursuant to section 702(b)(4)(A)(i) of the Act, the Department notified representatives of the GOC, GOIn, GOIt, GOK, and TA of the receipt of the Petitions. Also, in accordance with section 702(b)(4)(A)(ii) of the Act, the Department provided representatives of the GOC, GOIn, GOIt, GOK, and TA the opportunity for consultations with respect to the Petitions.\10\ Consultations were held with the TA on June 17, 2015, [[Page 37225]] with the GOIt on June 19, 2015, and with the GOK and the GOC on June 22, 2015. All memoranda regarding these consultations are on file electronically via ACCESS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See Letters of Invitation from the Department to the GOC (dated June 9, 2015), GOIn (dated June 5, 2015), GOIt (dated June 5, 2015), GOK (dated June 9, 2015), and the TA (dated June 4, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Determination of Industry Support for the Petitions Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires that a petition be filed on behalf of the domestic industry. Section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act provides that a petition meets this requirement if the domestic producers or workers who support the petition account for: (i) At least 25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and (ii) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support for, or opposition to, the petition. Moreover, section 702(c)(4)(D) of the Act provides that, if the petition does not establish support of domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of the total production of the domestic like product, the Department shall: (i) poll the industry or rely on other information in order to determine if there is support for the petition, as required by subparagraph (A); or (ii) determine industry support using a statistically valid sampling method to poll the ``industry.'' Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines the ``industry'' as the producers as a whole of a domestic like product. Thus, to determine whether a petition has the requisite industry support, the statute directs the Department to look to producers and workers who produce the domestic like product. The International Trade Commission (ITC), which is responsible for determining whether ``the domestic industry'' has been injured, must also determine what constitutes a domestic like product in order to define the industry. While both the Department and the ITC must apply the same statutory definition regarding the domestic like product,\11\ they do so for different purposes and pursuant to a separate and distinct authority. In addition, the Department's determination is subject to limitations of time and information. Although this may result in different definitions of the like product, such differences do not render the decision of either agency contrary to law.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See section 771(10) of the Act. \12\ See USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F. Supp. 2d 1, 8 (CIT 2001) (citing Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United States, 688 F. Supp. 639, 644 (CIT 1988), aff'd 865 F.2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989)). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 771(10) of the Act defines the domestic like product as ``a product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation under this title.'' Thus, the reference point from which the domestic like product analysis begins is ``the article subject to an investigation'' (i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to be investigated, which normally will be the scope as defined in the Petitions). With regard to the domestic like product, Petitioners do not offer a definition of the domestic like product distinct from the scope of the investigations. Based on our analysis of the information submitted on the record, we have determined that corrosion-resistant steel constitutes a single domestic like product and we have analyzed industry support in terms of that domestic like product.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ For a discussion of the domestic like product analysis in this case, see Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation Checklist: Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the People's Republic of China (PRC CVD Initiation Checklist), at Attachment II, Analysis of Industry Support for the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions Covering Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the People's Republic of China, India, Italy, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan (Attachment II); Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation Checklist: Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India (India CVD Initiation Checklist), at Attachment II; Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation Checklist: Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Italy (Italy CVD Initiation Checklist), at Attachment II; Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation Checklist: Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the Republic of Korea (Korea CVD Initiation Checklist), at Attachment II; and Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation Checklist: Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan (Taiwan CVD Initiation Checklist). These checklists are dated concurrently with this notice and on file electronically via ACCESS. Access to documents filed via ACCESS is also available in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In determining whether Petitioners have standing under section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act, we considered the industry support data contained in the Petitions with reference to the domestic like product as defined in the ``Scope of the Investigations,'' in Appendix I of this notice. Petitioners provided their shipments of the domestic like product in 2014, and estimated total shipments of the domestic like product for the entire domestic industry using data from the American Iron and Steel Institute and the ITC.\14\ To establish industry support, Petitioners compared their own shipments to estimated total shipments of the domestic like product for the entire domestic industry.\15\ Because data regarding total production of the domestic like product are not reasonably available to Petitioners and Petitioners have established that shipments are a reasonable proxy for production, we have relied on the shipment data provided by Petitioners for purposes of measuring industry support.\16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See Volume I of the Petitions, at 2-3 and Exhibits I-3 to I-5; see also General Issues Supplement, at 12-14 and Exhibits Supp. I-3, Supp. I-40 to Supp. I-42, and Supp. I-45. \15\ Id. \16\ For further discussion, see PRC CVD Initiation Checklist, India CVD Initiation Checklist, Italy CVD Initiation Checklist, Korea CVD Initiation Checklist, and Taiwan CVD Initiation Checklist, at Attachment II. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On June 12, 2015, we received a submission from Thomas Steel Strip Corporation (Thomas) and Apollo Metals, Ltd. (Apollo), domestic producers of corrosion-resistant steel. In the submission, Thomas and Apollo state that they support the Petitions for the imposition of antidumping and countervailing duties on corrosion-resistant steel from the PRC, Korea, Italy and Taiwan. Thomas and Apollo do not express a view with respect to the Petitions for the imposition of antidumping and countervailing duties on corrosion-resistant steel from India. In addition, Thomas and Apollo provide their 2014 production of the domestic like product.\17\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ See Letter to the Department from Thomas Steel Strip Corporation and Apollo Metals, Ltd., entitled ``Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, Italy, and Taiwan: Statement of Support for the Petitions and Comments Concerning Nickel-Plated Steel Products,'' dated June 12, 2015. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We have relied on the data provided by Petitioners, Thomas, and Apollo for purposes of measuring industry support.\18\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ See PRC CVD Initiation Checklist, India CVD Initiation Checklist, Italy CVD Initiation Checklist, Korea CVD Initiation Checklist, and Taiwan CVD Initiation Checklist, at Attachment II. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Our review of the data provided in the Petitions, General Issues supplement, the submission from Thomas and Apollo, and other information readily available to the Department indicates that Petitioners have established industry support for all of the Petitions.\19\ First, the Petitions established support from domestic producers (or workers) accounting for more than 50 percent of the total production of the domestic like product and, as such, the Department is not required to take further action in order to evaluate industry support (e.g., polling).\20\ Second, the domestic [[Page 37226]] producers (or workers) have met the statutory criteria for industry support under section 702(c)(4)(A)(i) of the Act for all of the Petitions because the domestic producers (or workers) who support each of the Petitions account for at least 25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product.\21\ Finally, the domestic producers (or workers) have met the statutory criteria for industry support under section 702(c)(4)(A)(ii) of the Act for all of the Petitions because the domestic producers (or workers) who support each of the Petitions account for more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support for, or opposition to, the Petitions.\22\ Accordingly, the Department determines that the Petitions were filed on behalf of the domestic industry within the meaning of section 702(b)(1) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ See PRC CVD Initiation Checklist, India CVD Initiation Checklist, Italy CVD Initiation Checklist, Korea CVD Initiation Checklist, and Taiwan CVD Initiation Checklist, at Attachment II. \20\ See section 702(c)(4)(D) of the Act; see also PRC CVD Initiation Checklist, India CVD Initiation Checklist, Italy CVD Initiation Checklist, Korea CVD Initiation Checklist, and Taiwan CVD Initiation Checklist, at Attachment II. \21\ See PRC CVD Initiation Checklist, India CVD Initiation Checklist, Italy CVD Initiation Checklist, Korea CVD Initiation Checklist, and Taiwan CVD Initiation Checklist, at Attachment II. \22\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department finds that Petitioners filed the Petitions on behalf of the domestic industry because they are interested parties as defined in section 771(9)(C) of the Act and they have demonstrated sufficient industry support with respect to the CVD investigations that they are requesting the Department initiate.\23\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \23\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Injury Test Because the PRC, India, Italy, Korea, and Taiwan are ``Subsidies Agreement Countries'' within the meaning of section 701(b) of the Act, section 701(a)(2) of the Act applies to these investigations. Accordingly, the ITC must determine whether imports of the subject merchandise from the PRC, India, Italy, Korea, and/or Taiwan materially injure, or threaten material injury to, a U.S. industry. Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation Petitioners allege that imports of the subject merchandise are benefitting from countervailable subsidies and that such imports are causing, or threaten to cause, material injury to the U.S. industry producing the domestic like product. Petitioners allege that subject imports exceed the negligibility threshold of three percent provided for under section 771(24)(A) of the Act.\24\ In CVD petitions, section 771(24)(B) of the Act provides that imports of subject merchandise from least developed countries must exceed the negligibility threshold of four percent. Petitioners also demonstrate that subject imports from India, which has been designated as a least developed country under section 771(36)(B) of the Act, exceed the negligibility threshold provided for under section 771(24)(B) of the Act.\25\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \24\ See Volume I of the Petitions, at 24 (footnote 87) and Exhibit I-27. \25\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Petitioners contend that the industry's injured condition is illustrated by reduced market share; underselling and price suppression or depression; lost sales and revenues; oversupply and inventory overhang in the U.S. market; and adverse impact on domestic industry performance.\26\ We have assessed the allegations and supporting evidence regarding material injury, threat of material injury, and causation, and we have determined that these allegations are properly supported by adequate evidence and meet the statutory requirements for initiation.\27\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \26\ See Volume I of the Petitions, at 17-19, 24-43 and Exhibits I-5, I-12 and I-18 through I-27; see also General Issues Supplement, at 1 and Exhibits Supp. I-18, Supp. I-25, Supp. I-26, and Supp. I- 28. \27\ See PRC CVD Initiation Checklist, India CVD Initiation Checklist, Italy CVD Initiation Checklist, Korea CVD Initiation Checklist, and Taiwan CVD Initiation Checklist at Attachment III, Analysis of Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation for the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions Covering Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the People's Republic of China, India, Italy, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires the Department to initiate a CVD investigation whenever an interested party files a CVD petition on behalf of an industry that: (1) Alleges the elements necessary for an imposition of a duty under section 701(a) of the Act; and (2) is accompanied by information reasonably available to Petitioners supporting the allegations. Petitioners allege that producers/exporters of corrosion-resistant steel in the PRC, India, Italy, Korea, and Taiwan benefited from countervailable subsidies bestowed by the governments/authorities of these countries, respectively. The Department examined the Petitions and finds that they comply with the requirements of section 702(b)(1) of the Act. Therefore, in accordance with section 702(b)(1) of the Act, we are initiating CVD investigations to determine whether manufacturers, producers, or exporters of corrosion-resistant steel from the PRC, India, Italy, Korea, and Taiwan receive countervailable subsidies from the governments/authorities of these countries, respectively. The PRC Based on our review of the petition, we find that there is sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 47 of the 48 alleged programs. For a full discussion of the basis for our decision to initiate or not initiate on each program, see the PRC CVD Initiation Checklist. India Based on our review of the petition, we find that there is sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 52 of the 53 alleged programs. For a full discussion of the basis for our decision to initiate or not initiate on each program, see the India CVD Initiation Checklist. Italy Based on our review of the petition, we find that there is sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 12 of the 14 alleged programs. For a full discussion of the basis for our decision to initiate or not initiate on each program, see the Italy CVD Initiation Checklist. Korea Based on our review of the petition, we find that there is sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 39 of the 41 alleged programs. For a full discussion of the basis for our decision to initiate or not initiate on each program, see the Korea CVD Initiation Checklist. Taiwan Based on our review of the petition, we find that there is sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 20 of the 22 alleged programs. For a full discussion of the basis for our decision to initiate or not initiate on each program, see the Taiwan CVD Initiation Checklist. A public version of the initiation checklist for each investigation is available on ACCESS. In accordance with section 703(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(1), unless postponed, we will make our preliminary determinations no later than 65 days after the date of this initiation. Respondent Selection Petitioners named 146 companies as producers/exporters of corrosion-resistant steel from the PRC, 26 from India, 7 from Italy, 11 from Korea, and 35 from Taiwan.\28\ Following standard [[Page 37227]] practice in CVD investigations, the Department will, where appropriate, select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data for U.S. imports of corrosion-resistant steel during the periods of investigation under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) numbers: 7210.30.0030, 7210.30.0060, 7210.41.0000, 7210.49.0030, 7210.49.0091, 7210.49.0095, 7210.61.0000, 7210.69.0000, 7210.70.6030, 7210.70.6060, 7210.70.6090, 7210.90.6000, 7210.90.9000, 7212.20.0000, 7212.30.1030, 7212.30.1090, 7212.30.3000, 7212.30.5000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, and 7212.60.0000. We intend to release CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (APO) to all parties with access to information protected by APO within five-business days of publication of this Federal Register notice. The Department invites comments regarding respondent selection within seven days of publication of this Federal Register notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \28\ See Volume I of the Petitions, at Exhibits I-7 to I-11. For Taiwan, see also Volume XI at Exhibit XI-1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comments must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically-filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by ACCESS, by 5 p.m. ET by the date noted above. We intend to make our decision regarding respondent selection within 20 days of publication of this notice. Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(b). Instructions for filing such applications may be found on the Department's Web site at http://enforcement.trade.gov/apo. Distribution of Copies of the Petitions In accordance with section 702(b)(4)(A)(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.202(f), copies of the public version of the Petitions have been provided to the GOC, GOIn, GOIt, GOK and TA via ACCESS. To the extent practicable, we will attempt to provide a copy of the public version of the Petitions to each known exporter (as named in the Petitions), consistent with 19 CFR 351.203(c)(2). ITC Notification We will notify the ITC of our initiation, as required by section 702(d) of the Act. Preliminary Determinations by the ITC The ITC will preliminarily determine, within 45 days after the date on which the Petitions were filed, whether there is a reasonable indication that imports of corrosion-resistant steel from the PRC, India, Italy, Korea, and Taiwan are materially injuring, or threatening material injury to, a U.S. industry.\29\ A negative ITC determination for any country will result in the investigation being terminated with respect to that country; \30\ otherwise, these investigations will proceed according to statutory and regulatory time limits. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \29\ See section 703(a) of the Act. \30\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Submission of Factual Information Factual information is defined in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) as: (i) Evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available information to value factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed on the record by the Department; and (v) evidence other than factual information described in (i)-(iv). The regulation requires any party, when submitting factual information, to specify under which subsection of 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) the information is being submitted and, if the information is submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct factual information already on the record, to provide an explanation identifying the information already on the record that the factual information seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. Time limits for the submission of factual information are addressed in 19 CFR 351.301, which provides specific time limits based on the type of factual information being submitted. Parties should review the regulations prior to submitting factual information in these investigations. Extension of Time Limits Regulation Parties may request an extension of time limits before the expiration of a time limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as otherwise specified by the Secretary. In general, an extension request will be considered untimely if it is filed after the expiration of the time limit established under 19 CFR 351.301 expires. For submissions that are due from multiple parties simultaneously, an extension request will be considered untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on the due date. Under certain circumstances, we may elect to specify a different time limit by which extension requests will be considered untimely for submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such a case, we will inform parties in the letter or memorandum setting forth the deadline (including a specified time) by which extension requests must be filed to be considered timely. An extension request must be made in a separate, stand-alone submission; under limited circumstances we will grant untimely-filed requests for the extension of time limits. Review Extension of Time Limits; Final Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013), available at http://www.thefederalregister.org/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm, prior to submitting factual information in these investigations. Certification Requirements Any party submitting factual information in an AD or CVD proceeding must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.\31\ Parties are hereby reminded that revised certification requirements are in effect for company/government officials, as well as their representatives. Investigations initiated on the basis of petitions filed on or after August 16, 2013, and other segments of any AD or CVD proceedings initiated on or after August 16, 2013, should use the formats for the revised certifications provided at the end of the Final Rule.\32\ The Department intends to reject factual submissions if the submitting party does not comply with the applicable revised certification requirements. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \31\ See section 782(b) of the Act. \32\ See Certification of Factual Information To Import Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Interested Parties Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On January 22, 2008, the Department published Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Documents Submission Procedures; APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January 22, 2008). Parties wishing to participate in these investigations should ensure that they meet the requirements of these procedures (e.g., the filing of letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). This notice is issued and published pursuant to sections 702 and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: June 23, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Attachment I Scope of the Investigation The products covered by this investigation are certain flat- rolled steel products, either [[Page 37228]] clad, plated, or coated with corrosion-resistant metals such as zinc, aluminum, or zinc-, aluminum-, nickel- or iron-based alloys, whether or not corrugated or painted, varnished, laminated, or coated with plastics or other non-metallic substances in addition to the metallic coating. The products covered include coils that have a width of 12.7 mm or greater, regardless of form of coil (e.g., in successively superimposed layers, spirally oscillating, etc.). The products covered also include products not in coils (e.g., in straight lengths) of a thickness less than 4.75 mm and a width that is 12.7 mm or greater and that measures at least 10 times the thickness. The products covered also include products not in coils (e.g., in straight lengths) of a thickness of 4.75 mm or more and a width exceeding 150 mm and measuring at least twice the thickness. The products described above may be rectangular, square, circular, or other shape and include products of either rectangular or non- rectangular cross-section where such cross-section is achieved subsequent to the rolling process, i.e., products which have been ``worked after rolling'' (e.g., products which have been beveled or rounded at the edges). For purposes of the width and thickness requirements referenced above: (1) Where the nominal and actual measurements vary, a product is within the scope if application of either the nominal or actual measurement would place it within the scope based on the definitions set forth above, and (2) where the width and thickness vary for a specific product (e.g., the thickness of certain products with non-rectangular cross- section, the width of certain products with non-rectangular shape, etc.), the measurement at its greatest width or thickness applies. Steel products included in the scope of this investigation are products in which: (1) Iron predominates, by weight, over each of the other contained elements; (2) the carbon content is 2 percent or less, by weight; and (3) none of the elements listed below exceeds the quantity, by weight, respectively indicated:2.50 percent of manganese, or 3.30 percent of silicon, or 1.50 percent of copper, or 1.50 percent of aluminum, or 1.25 percent of chromium, or 0.30 percent of cobalt, or 0.40 percent of lead, or 2.00 percent of nickel, or 0.30 percent of tungsten (also called wolfram), or 0.80 percent of molybdenum, or 0.10 percent of niobium (also called columbium), or 0.30 percent of vanadium, or 0.30 percent of zirconium Unless specifically excluded, products are included in this scope regardless of levels of boron and titanium. For example, specifically included in this scope are vacuum degassed, fully stabilized (commonly referred to as interstitial- free (IF)) steels and high strength low alloy (HSLA) steels. IF steels are recognized as low carbon steels with micro-alloying levels of elements such as titanium and/or niobium added to stabilize carbon and nitrogen elements. HSLA steels are recognized as steels with micro-alloying levels of elements such as chromium, copper, niobium, titanium, vanadium, and molybdenum. Furthermore, this scope also includes Advanced High Strength Steels (AHSS) and Ultra High Strength Steels (UHSS), both of which are considered high tensile strength and high elongation steels. All products that meet the written physical description, and in which the chemistry quantities do not exceed any one of the noted element levels listed above, are within the scope of this investigation unless specifically excluded. The following products are outside of and/or specifically excluded from the scope of this investigation: Flat-rolled steel products either plated or coated with tin, lead, chromium, chromium oxides, both tin and lead (``terne plate''), or both chromium and chromium oxides (``tin free steel''), whether or not painted, varnished or coated with plastics or other non-metallic substances in addition to the metallic coating; Clad products in straight lengths of 4.7625 mm or more in composite thickness and of a width which exceeds 150 mm and measures at least twice the thickness; and Certain clad stainless flat-rolled products, which are three-layered corrosion-resistant flat-rolled steel products less than 4.75 mm in composite thickness that consist of a flat-rolled steel product clad on both sides with stainless steel in a 20%-60%- 20% ratio. The products subject to the investigation are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under item numbers: 7210.30.0030, 7210.30.0060, 7210.41.0000, 7210.49.0030, 7210.49.0091, 7210.49.0095, 7210.61.0000, 7210.69.0000, 7210.70.6030, 7210.70.6060, 7210.70.6090, 7210.90.6000, 7210.90.9000, 7212.20.0000, 7212.30.1030, 7212.30.1090, 7212.30.3000, 7212.30.5000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, and 7212.60.0000. The products subject to the investigation may also enter under the following HTSUS item numbers: 7210.90.1000, 7215.90.1000, 7215.90.3000, 7215.90.5000, 7217.20.1500, 7217.30.1530, 7217.30.1560, 7217.90.1000, 7217.90.5030, 7217.90.5060, 7217.90.5090, 7225.91.0000, 7225.92.0000, 7225.99.0090, 7226.99.0110, 7226.99.0130, 7226.99.0180, 7228.60.6000, 7228.60.8000, and 7229.90.1000. The HTSUS subheadings above are provided for convenience and customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of the investigation is dispositive. [FR Doc. 2015-16067 Filed 6-29-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 125 / Tuesday, June 30, 2015 / Notices 37223
Preliminary Results of the Changed ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Circumstances Review the day on which it is due.22
International Trade Administration
Based on the evidence reviewed, we Any interested party may submit a
preliminarily determine that Shanfu II is request for a hearing to the Assistant [C–570–027, C–533–864, C–475–833, C–580–
Secretary of Enforcement and 879, C–583–857]
not the successor-in-interest to Shanfu I.
Specifically, we find that material Compliance using ACCESS within 30
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel
changes occurred after Shanfu I days of publication of this notice in the
Products From the People’s Republic
dissolved and Shanfu II was registered. Federal Register.23 Hearing requests
of China, India, Italy, the Republic of
These were changes in management, should contain the following Korea, and Taiwan: Initiation of
business scope, production facilities, information: (1) The party’s name, Countervailing Duty Investigations
supplier relationships, and ownership/ address, and telephone number; (2) the
legal structure with respect to the number of participants; and (3) a list of AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
production and sale of the subject the issues to be discussed.24 Oral International Trade Administration,
merchandise.16 Thus, we preliminarily presentations will be limited to issues Department of Commerce.
determine that Shanfu II does not raised in the briefs. If a request for a DATES: Effective Date: June 30, 2015.
operate as the same business entity as hearing is made, parties will be notified FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shanfu I with respect to the subject of the time and date for the hearing to Myrna Lobo at (202) 482–2371 (the
merchandise. A list of topics discussed be held at the U.S. Department of People’s Republic of China, and the
in the Preliminary Decision Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue Republic of Korea); Matt Renkey or Jerry
Memorandum appears in the Appendix NW., Washington, DC 20230.25 Huang at (202) 482–2312 and (202) 482–
to this notice. 4047, respectively (India); Robert
If the Department upholds these Final Results of the Review Palmer at (202) 482–9068 (Italy); Kristen
preliminary results in the final results, Johnson at (202) 482–4793 (Taiwan),
In accordance with 19 CFR
Yongjia and Shanfu will be assigned the AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and
351.216(e), the Department intends to Compliance, International Trade
cash deposit rate currently assigned to issue the final results of this changed
the PRC-wide entity with respect to the Administration, U.S. Department of
circumstances review not later than 270 Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
subject merchandise (i.e., the $4.71 per
days after the date on which the review Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
kilogram cash deposit rate currently
is initiated. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
assigned to the PRC-wide entity).17 If
these preliminary results are adopted in Notification to Parties The Petitions
the final results of this changed
circumstances review, we will instruct The Department issues and publishes On June 3, 2015, the Department of
U.S. Customs and Border Protection to these results in accordance with Commerce (Department) received
suspend liquidation of entries of fresh sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i) of the Act countervailing duty (CVD) petitions
garlic made by Shanfu II and exported and 19 CFR 351.216 and 351.221. concerning imports of certain corrosion-
by Yongjia, effective on the publication resistant steel products (corrosion-
Dated: June 23, 2015.
date of the final results, at the cash resistant steel) from the People’s
Paul Piquado, Republic of China (PRC), India, Italy,
deposit rate assigned to the PRC-wide
entity. Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and the Republic of Korea (Korea), and
Compliance. Taiwan, filed in proper form on behalf
Public Comment of United States Steel Corporation,
Appendix
Interested parties may submit written Nucor Corporation, Steel Dynamics,
comments by no later than 30 days after
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Inc., ArcelorMittal USA, LLC, AK Steel
Decision Memorandum Corporation, and California Steel
the date of publication of these
preliminary results of review in the I. Summary Industries, (collectively, Petitioners).
Federal Register.18 Rebuttals, limited to II. Background The CVD petitions were accompanied
issues raised in the written comments, III. Scope of the Order by antidumping duty (AD) petitions also
may be filed by no later than five days IV. Preliminary Results of Changed concerning imports of corrosion-
after the written comments are filed.19 Circumstances Review Successor-in- resistant steel from all of the above
Parties that submit written comments or Interest countries.1 Petitioners are domestic
rebuttals are encouraged to submit with 1. Changes in Ownership And Management producers of corrosion-resistant steel.2
2. Production Facilities and Equipment On June 9 and 10, 2015, the
each argument: (1) A statement of the
3. Supplier Relationships Department requested information and
issue; (2) a brief summary of the
4. Customer Base clarification for certain areas of the
argument; and (3) a table of
5. Other Material Considerations Petitions.3 Petitioners filed responses to
authorities.20 All briefs are to be filed
a. Dissolution
electronically using ACCESS.21 An 1 See ‘‘Petitions for the Imposition of
b. Change in Corporate Form
electronically filed document must be Antidumping and Countervailing Duties on
V. Summary of Preliminary Findings
received successfully in its entirety by VI. Recommendation
Imports: Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products
from the People’s Republic of China, India Italy, the
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
16 See
[FR Doc. 2015–16082 Filed 6–29–15; 8:45 am] Republic of Korea, and Taiwan,’’ dated June 3, 2015
Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4. (Petitions).
17 See Fresh Garlic from the People’s Republic of BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 2 See Volume I of the Petitions, at I–2 and Exhibit
China: Final Results and Rescission, In Part, of I–1.
Twelfth New Shipper Reviews, 73 FR 56550 3 See Letter from the Department to Petitioners
(September 29, 2008).
18 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
22 See 19 CFR 351.303(b) entitled ‘‘Petition for the Imposition of
23 See
Countervailing Duties on Imports of Certain
19 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1). 19 CFR 351.310(c).
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the
20 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) & (d)(2). 24 Id.
People’s Republic of China (PRC): Supplemental
21 See 19 CFR 351.303(b) and (f). 25 See 19 CFR 351.310(d). Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Jun 29, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM 30JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_37348/page/1.svg)
![37228 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 125 / Tuesday, June 30, 2015 / Notices
clad, plated, or coated with corrosion- stabilize carbon and nitrogen elements. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
resistant metals such as zinc, aluminum, or HSLA steels are recognized as steels with
zinc-, aluminum-, nickel- or iron-based micro-alloying levels of elements such as International Trade Administration
alloys, whether or not corrugated or painted, chromium, copper, niobium, titanium,
varnished, laminated, or coated with plastics vanadium, and molybdenum. [A–475–832, A–533–863, A–570–026, A–580–
or other non-metallic substances in addition 878, A–583–856]
Furthermore, this scope also includes
to the metallic coating. The products covered
include coils that have a width of 12.7 mm Advanced High Strength Steels (AHSS) and Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel
or greater, regardless of form of coil (e.g., in Ultra High Strength Steels (UHSS), both of Products From Italy, India, the
successively superimposed layers, spirally which are considered high tensile strength People’s Republic of China, the
oscillating, etc.). The products covered also and high elongation steels.
Republic of Korea, and Taiwan:
include products not in coils (e.g., in straight All products that meet the written physical
Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value
lengths) of a thickness less than 4.75 mm and description, and in which the chemistry
a width that is 12.7 mm or greater and that Investigations
quantities do not exceed any one of the noted
measures at least 10 times the thickness. The element levels listed above, are within the AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
products covered also include products not scope of this investigation unless specifically
in coils (e.g., in straight lengths) of a
International Trade Administration,
excluded. The following products are outside Department of Commerce.
thickness of 4.75 mm or more and a width
exceeding 150 mm and measuring at least of and/or specifically excluded from the DATES: Effective Date: June 30, 2015.
twice the thickness. The products described scope of this investigation:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia
above may be rectangular, square, circular, or • Flat-rolled steel products either plated or Hancock or Susan Pulongbarit at (202)
other shape and include products of either coated with tin, lead, chromium,
rectangular or non-rectangular cross-section 482–1394 and (202) 482–4031,
chromium oxides, both tin and lead (‘‘terne
where such cross-section is achieved respectively (Italy), Alexis Polovina at
plate’’), or both chromium and chromium
subsequent to the rolling process, i.e., (202) 482–3927 (India); David Lindgren
oxides (‘‘tin free steel’’), whether or not
products which have been ‘‘worked after at (202) 482–3870 (the People’s
painted, varnished or coated with plastics
rolling’’ (e.g., products which have been Republic of China (PRC)); David
beveled or rounded at the edges). For or other non-metallic substances in
Lindgren at (202) 482–3870 (the
purposes of the width and thickness addition to the metallic coating;
Republic of Korea (Korea)); or Brendan
requirements referenced above: • Clad products in straight lengths of 4.7625
mm or more in composite thickness and of
Quinn or Paul Stolz at (202) 482–5848
(1) Where the nominal and actual
measurements vary, a product is within the a width which exceeds 150 mm and
and (202) 482–4474, respectively
scope if application of either the nominal or measures at least twice the thickness; and (Taiwan), AD/CVD Operations,
actual measurement would place it within • Certain clad stainless flat-rolled products, Enforcement and Compliance, U.S.
the scope based on the definitions set forth which are three-layered corrosion-resistant Department of Commerce, 14th Street
above, and
flat-rolled steel products less than 4.75 mm and Constitution Avenue NW.,
(2) where the width and thickness vary for Washington, DC 20230.
a specific product (e.g., the thickness of in composite thickness that consist of a
flat-rolled steel product clad on both sides SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
certain products with non-rectangular cross-
section, the width of certain products with with stainless steel in a 20%–60%–20%
The Petitions
non-rectangular shape, etc.), the ratio.
measurement at its greatest width or The products subject to the investigation On June 3, 2015, the Department of
thickness applies. are currently classified in the Harmonized Commerce (the Department) received
Steel products included in the scope of this Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) antidumping duty (AD) petitions
investigation are products in which: (1) Iron concerning imports of certain corrosion-
under item numbers: 7210.30.0030,
predominates, by weight, over each of the resistant steel products (corrosion-
other contained elements; (2) the carbon 7210.30.0060, 7210.41.0000, 7210.49.0030,
7210.49.0091, 7210.49.0095, 7210.61.0000, resistant steel) from Italy, India, the
content is 2 percent or less, by weight; and
(3) none of the elements listed below exceeds 7210.69.0000, 7210.70.6030, 7210.70.6060, PRC, Korea, and Taiwan, filed in proper
the quantity, by weight, respectively 7210.70.6090, 7210.90.6000, 7210.90.9000, form on behalf of United States Steel
indicated: 7212.20.0000, 7212.30.1030, 7212.30.1090, Corporation, Nucor Corporation,
• 2.50 percent of manganese, or 7212.30.3000, 7212.30.5000, 7212.40.1000, ArcelorMittal USA, AK Steel
• 3.30 percent of silicon, or 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, and Corporation, Steel Dynamics, Inc., and
• 1.50 percent of copper, or 7212.60.0000. California Steel Industries, Inc.,
• 1.50 percent of aluminum, or The products subject to the investigation (Petitioners).1 The AD petitions were
• 1.25 percent of chromium, or may also enter under the following HTSUS accompanied by five countervailing
• 0.30 percent of cobalt, or item numbers: 7210.90.1000, 7215.90.1000, duty (CVD) petitions.2 Petitioners are
• 0.40 percent of lead, or domestic producers of corrosion-
7215.90.3000, 7215.90.5000, 7217.20.1500,
• 2.00 percent of nickel, or
• 0.30 percent of tungsten (also called 7217.30.1530, 7217.30.1560, 7217.90.1000, resistant steel.3
wolfram), or 7217.90.5030, 7217.90.5060, 7217.90.5090, On June 9, 2015, and June 10, 2015,
• 0.80 percent of molybdenum, or 7225.91.0000, 7225.92.0000, 7225.99.0090, the Department requested additional
• 0.10 percent of niobium (also called 7226.99.0110, 7226.99.0130, 7226.99.0180, information and clarification of certain
columbium), or 7228.60.6000, 7228.60.8000, and areas of the Petitions.4 Petitioners filed
• 0.30 percent of vanadium, or 7229.90.1000.
• 0.30 percent of zirconium The HTSUS subheadings above are 1 See Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping
Unless specifically excluded, products are provided for convenience and customs Duties on Imports of Certain Corrosion-Resistant
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
included in this scope regardless of levels of Steel Products from Italy, India, the PRC, Korea,
purposes only. The written description of the
and Taiwan, dated June 3, 2015 (the Petitions).
boron and titanium. scope of the investigation is dispositive. 2 See the Petitions for the Imposition of
For example, specifically included in this
[FR Doc. 2015–16067 Filed 6–29–15; 8:45 am] Countervailing Duties on Imports of Certain
scope are vacuum degassed, fully stabilized Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Italy, India,
(commonly referred to as interstitial-free (IF)) BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
the PRC, Korea, and Taiwan, dated June 3, 2015.
steels and high strength low alloy (HSLA) 3 See Volume I of the Petitions, at 2, and Exhibit
steels. IF steels are recognized as low carbon I–1.
steels with micro-alloying levels of elements 4 See Letter from the Department to Petitioners
such as titanium and/or niobium added to entitled ‘‘Re: Petitions for the Imposition of
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Jun 29, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM 30JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_37348/page/6.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-22 11:16:39
Document Modified: 2018-02-22 11:16:39
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective Date: June 30, 2015. | |
| Contact | Myrna Lobo at (202) 482-2371 (the People's Republic of China, and the Republic of Korea); Matt Renkey or Jerry Huang at (202) 482-2312 and (202) 482-4047, respectively (India); Robert Palmer at (202) 482-9068 (Italy); Kristen Johnson at (202) 482- 4793 (Taiwan), AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 37223 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR