80 FR 37237 - Request for Information Regarding the Consumer Complaint Database: Data Normalization

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 125 (June 30, 2015)

Page Range		37237-37239
FR Document		2015-16096

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (``Bureau'') established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (``Dodd-Frank Act''), maintains the Consumer Complaint Database (``Database'') as a part of its efforts to provide consumers with timely and understandable information to help enable them to make responsible financial decisions and to enhance market efficiency and transparency. The purpose of this request for information is to solicit and collect input from the public on how data are presented in the Database. The Bureau is requesting feedback on best practices for ``normalizing'' the raw complaint data it makes available via the Database so they are easier for the public to use and understand. To normalize data is to transform ``raw'' data so that they may be compared in meaningful ways. This transformation increases the interoperability of ``raw'' data--that is, the extent to which different users can share and make use of the data because they have a common understanding of its meaning. Commenters offered various suggestions on how to approach normalization during the public comment period leading up to the establishment of the Database; the comments' variety highlighted differing and sometimes conflicting perspectives and concerns. In an effort to continue dialogue on easier ways to compare complaint handling performance, the Bureau requests specific suggestions from market participants, consumers, and other stakeholders on data normalization and its proper implementation within the Database.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 125 (Tuesday, June 30, 2015)

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 125 (Tuesday, June 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37237-37239]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16096]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION

[Docket No.: CFPB-2015-0030]


Request for Information Regarding the Consumer Complaint 
Database: Data Normalization

AGENCY: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

ACTION: Notice and request for information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (``Bureau'') 
established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 
Protection Act of 2010 (``Dodd-Frank Act''), maintains the Consumer 
Complaint Database (``Database'') as a part of its efforts to provide 
consumers with timely and understandable information to help enable 
them to make responsible financial decisions and to enhance market 
efficiency and transparency.
    The purpose of this request for information is to solicit and 
collect input from the public on how data are presented in the 
Database.
    The Bureau is requesting feedback on best practices for 
``normalizing'' the raw complaint data it makes available via the 
Database so they are easier for the public to use and understand. To 
normalize data is to transform ``raw'' data so that they may be 
compared in meaningful ways. This transformation increases the 
interoperability of ``raw'' data--that is, the extent to which 
different users can share and make use of the data because they have a 
common understanding of its meaning. Commenters offered various 
suggestions on how to approach normalization during the public comment 
period leading up to the establishment of the Database; the comments' 
variety highlighted differing and sometimes conflicting perspectives 
and concerns. In an effort to continue dialogue on easier ways to 
compare complaint handling performance, the Bureau requests specific 
suggestions from market participants, consumers, and other stakeholders 
on data normalization and its proper implementation within the 
Database.

DATES: Written comments are encouraged and must be received on or 
before August 31, 2015 to be assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: You may submit responsive information and other comments, 
identified by Docket No. CFPB-2015-0030, by any of the following 
methods:
     Electronic: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Monica Jackson, Office of the Executive Secretary, 
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 1700 G Street NW., Washington, DC 
20006.
     Hand Delivery/Courier: Monica Jackson, Office of the 
Executive Secretary, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 1275 First 
Street NE., Washington, DC 20002.
    Instructions: The Bureau encourages the early submission of 
comments. All submissions must include the document title and docket 
number. Because paper mail in the Washington, DC area and at the Bureau 
is subject to delay, commenters are encouraged to submit comments 
electronically. Please note the number associated with any question to 
which you are responding at the top of each response (you are not 
required to answer all questions to receive consideration of your 
comments). In general, all comments received will be posted without 
change to http://www.regulations.gov. In addition, comments will be 
available for public inspection and copying at 1275 First Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20002, on official business days between the hours of 10 
a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time. You can make an appointment to inspect 
the documents by telephoning 202-435-7275.
    All submissions, including attachments and other supporting 
materials, will become part of the public record and subject to public 
disclosure. Sensitive personal information, such as account numbers or 
Social Security numbers, should not be included. Submissions will not 
be edited to remove any identifying or contact information.

[[Page 37238]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For submission process questions 
please contact Monica Jackson, Office of Executive Secretary, at 202-
435-7275. For inquires related to the substance of this request, please 
contact Christopher Johnson, Acting Assistant Director of the Office of 
Consumer Response at 202-435-7455 or [email protected].

    Authority: 12 U.S.C. 5511(c).


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Bureau hears directly from the American 
public about their experiences with the nation's consumer financial 
marketplace. An important aspect of the Bureau's mission is the 
handling of individual consumer complaints about financial products and 
services. Indeed, ``collecting, investigating, and responding to 
consumer complaints,'' is one of six statutory ``primary functions'' of 
the Bureau as prescribed in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 
Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (``Dodd-Frank Act'').\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 12 U.S.C. 5511(c)(2). The Dodd-Frank Act additionally 
instructs the Bureau to create a ``Specific Functional Unit'' whose 
function is ``Collecting and Tracking Complaints.'' 12 U.S.C. 
5493(b)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Bureau considers consumer complaints and gathers information as 
it monitors markets for risks to consumers and, subject to certain 
legal constraints, may publish information of which it is made 
aware.\2\ In June 2012, the Bureau began making individual-level 
complaint data available on its Web site.\3\ Since then, the Database 
has been expanded multiple times to include additional financial 
products and data fields.\4\ Most recently, the Bureau published a 
final policy statement on disclosure of consumer complaint narrative 
data.\5\ The Bureau is committed to the continued improvement of the 
Database in terms of both the fields of data made publicly available as 
well as the usefulness of, and appropriate formats for, that data. 
Consistent with these goals, the Bureau is seeking best practices for 
normalizing relevant data in the Database.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 12 U.S.C. 5511(c) and 5512(c).
    \3\ Disclosure of Certain Credit Card Complaint Data (Final 
policy statement), 77 FR 37558 (June 22, 2012).
    \4\ See, e.g., Disclosure of Consumer Complaint Data (Final 
policy statement), 78 FR 21218 (Apr. 10, 2013).
    \5\ Disclosure of Consumer Complaint Narrative Data (Final 
policy statement), 80 FR 15572 (Mar. 24, 2015). The final policy 
statement on consumer complaint narratives is separate and distinct 
from this request for information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Data Normalization. Throughout the Database's launch and expansion, 
the Bureau has solicited feedback on ways to make raw complaint data 
more meaningful by supplementing that data with a context more useful 
for consumers and other market participants. For example, providing the 
total number of complaints against an issuer of credit cards may offer 
limited opportunities to analyze that company against other credit card 
issuers. However, additional information on the size of the issuer's 
credit card business as compared to others provides another aspect from 
which consumers may make better informed decisions. This process of 
giving context to data is commonly referred to as ``normalization'' in 
statistical applications. (``Normalization'' as discussed here should 
not be confused with the term ``database normalization,'' which refers 
to the technical process of designing an efficient way to store data in 
a computerized database.)
    In its initial proposed policy statement to launch the Database 
with credit card complaint data, the Bureau expressed the benefits of 
normalization for both consumers and other stakeholders.\6\ Several 
commenters responding to the proposal echoed the need for normalized 
values in the credit card complaint data. One commenter noted the need 
to distinguish between consumers complaining about open, as opposed to 
closed, accounts in weighing credit card complaints against an issuer's 
overall credit card business. Other commenters suggested that 
normalized values could be achieved by providing an issuer's complaint 
rate according to their market share. Notably, the comments provided 
did not coalesce around a single appropriate normalization metric.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Disclosure of Certain Credit Card Complaint Data (Notice of 
proposed policy statement), 76 FR 76628, 76631 (Dec. 8, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the same issue of the Federal Register containing the finalized 
credit card disclosure policy statement, the Bureau proposed expanding 
the Database beyond credit card complaint information.\7\ Commenters 
provided additional feedback on normalization in response to the 
proposal.\8\ For example, one trade association representing debt 
collectors suggested the Database include the number of accounts held 
by the company, annual number of contacts made by the company, and the 
annual number of complaints made against the company. Additional 
commenters suggested that the database include information on numbers 
of transactions or accounts, information on closed or unopened 
accounts, and portfolio size. One trade association recommended that 
the normalizing metric be provided by independently verified data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Disclosure of Consumer Complaint Data (Notice of proposed 
policy statement), 77 FR 37616 (June 22, 2012).
    \8\ Disclosure of Consumer Complaint Data (Final policy 
statement), 78 FR 21218, 21222 (Apr. 10, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the proposed policy statement regarding the expansion of the 
Database to include consumer narratives, the Bureau again received 
feedback on the issue of normalization. Several companies, trade 
associations, and consumer groups submitted comments that reiterated 
the request for normalization to provide context to the available data. 
Both large and small institutions expressed concern that failure to 
indicate the relative share of complaints would cause confusion for 
consumers, resulting in unfair reputational harm. Commenters requested 
that complaint data and narratives be normalized to reflect institution 
size as measured by volume of customers or total transactions.
    The Bureau now requests specific suggestions for metrics it might 
implement in the Database to assist in normalizing the complaint data. 
Specifically, the Bureau is interested in responses to the general 
questions below:
    1. Is data normalization worthwhile, if so, how should the Bureau 
normalize data?
    2. How should ``categories'' be defined for the purpose of 
normalizing consumer complaint data? Should we normalize by product, 
sub-product, issue, geography, or another category?
    3. How should a ``market'' be defined for the purpose of 
normalizing consumer complaint data? How can ``market share'' be 
adequately evaluated and framed? What metrics should be used to 
evaluate market share? What factors within those metrics are we trying 
to normalize for, e.g., industry size, company market share, and 
population?
    4. Would normalized data allow for meaningful company-to-company 
comparisons within a market?
    5. Do the answers to the questions above differ based on the 
various categories reflected in the Database?
    6. What metrics would be required to normalize the data, e.g., 
number of accounts per financial institution, population by ZIP code or 
other geographic area, etc.? Can these metrics be reliably obtained? 
Should the Bureau seek to independently verify any normalizing metric 
that it might use? How could it most reliably and effectively do so?
    The Bureau does not anticipate publishing a proposed policy 
statement

[[Page 37239]]

on the subject of this request. The Bureau is committed to the 
continued improvement of the Database to help consumers make informed 
decisions about the financial marketplace. Consistent with these goals, 
the Bureau is seeking best practices for normalizing relevant data in 
the Database.

    Dated: June 24, 2015.
Richard Cordray,
Director, Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
[FR Doc. 2015-16096 Filed 6-29-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4810-25-P

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 125 / Tuesday, June 30, 2015 / Notices 37239

on the subject of this request. The BoV. Members of the Board will be Federal Officer, via electronic mail, the
Bureau is committed to the continued provided updates on Academy issues. preferred mode of submission, at the
improvement of the Database to help Proposed Agenda: The Board Chair address listed in the FOR FURTHER
consumers make informed decisions will discuss the following Topics: The INFORMATION CONTACT section. Each page
about the financial marketplace. next meeting date: November 16, 2015, of the comment or statement must
Consistent with these goals, the Bureau Washington, DC and give a summary of include the author’s name, title or
is seeking best practices for normalizing discussion topics; the Superintendent affiliation, address, and daytime phone
relevant data in the Database. will then give the following updates: number. Written comments or
Class of 2019 Admissions Update, statements being submitted in response
Dated: June 24, 2015.
Sexual Assault/Harassment Statistics, to the agenda set forth in this notice
Richard Cordray,
Sexual Assault and Prevention must be received by the Designated
Director, Bureau of Consumer Financial Response Office (SAPRO) Visit, Faculty Federal Official at least seven business
Protection.
Demographic Statistics, Faculty days prior to the meeting to be
[FR Doc. 2015–16096 Filed 6–29–15; 8:45 am] Operational Experience Update, Cadet considered by the committee. The
BILLING CODE 4810–25–P Summer Training Highlights (Academic Designated Federal Official will review
Individual Advanced Development/ all timely submitted written comments
Military Individual Advanced or statements with the committee
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Development (AIAD/MIAD) Maps), Chairperson, and ensure the comments
Construction Update. are provided to all members of the
Department of the Army Public’s Accessibility to the Meeting: committee before the meeting. Written
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b and 41 CFR comments or statements received after
Board of Visitors, United States 102–3.140 through 102–3.165 and this date may not be provided to the
Military Academy (USMA) subject to the availability of space, this committee until its next meeting.
AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD. meeting is open to the public. Seating is The committee Designated Federal
ACTION:Notice of open committee on a first to arrive basis. Attendees are Official and Chairperson may choose to
meeting. requested to submit their name, invite certain submitters to present their
affiliation, and daytime phone number comments verbally during the open
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army seven business days prior to the meeting portion of this meeting or at a future
is publishing this notice to announce to Mrs. Ghostlaw, via electronic mail, meeting. The Designated Federal
the following Federal advisory the preferred mode of submission, at the Officer, in consultation with the
committee meeting of the USMA Board address listed in the FOR FURTHER committee Chairperson, may allot a
of Visitors (BoV). This meeting is open INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members specific amount of time for submitters to
to the public. For more information of the public attending the committee present their comments verbally.
about the BoV, its membership and its meeting will not be permitted to present
activities, please visit the BoV Web site questions from the floor or speak to any Brenda S. Bowen,
at http://www.usma.edu/bov/SitePages/ issue under consideration by the Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
Home.aspx. committee. Because the meeting of the [FR Doc. 2015–15955 Filed 6–29–15; 8:45 am]

DATES: The USMA BoV will meet from
committee will be held in a Federal BILLING CODE 3710–08–P

2:00 p.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday, Government facility on a military post,
July 20, 2015. Members of the public security screening is required. A
government photo ID is required to DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
wishing to attend the meeting will be
required to show a government photo ID enter post. Please note that security and
gate guards have the right to inspect Department of the Army
upon entering West Point in order to
vehicles and persons seeking to enter Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive
gain access to the meeting location. All
and exit the installation. The United Patent License to Nano-C, Inc.;
members of the public are subject to
States Military Academy, West Point Westwood, MA
security screening.
Club is fully handicap accessible.
ADDRESSES: West Point Club, 603 Wheelchair access is available at the AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.
Cullum Road, Hudson Room, West front of the building south side (right ACTION: Notice of intent.
Point, NY 10996. side facing the building) and leads up to
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. the main entrance. For additional SUMMARY: In compliance with 35 U.S.C.
Deadra K. Ghostlaw, the Designated information about public access 209(e) and 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i), the
Federal Officer for the committee, in procedures, contact Mrs. Ghostlaw, the Department of the Army hereby gives
writing to: Secretary of the General committee’s Designated Federal Officer, notice of its intent to grant to Nano-C,
Staff, ATTN: Deadra K. Ghostlaw, 646 at the email address or telephone Inc.; a corporation having its principle
Swift Road, West Point, NY 10996, by number listed in the FOR FURTHER place of business at 33 Southwest Park,
email at deadra.ghostlaw@usma.edu or INFORMATION CONTACT section. Westwood, MA 02090, exclusive license
BoV@usma.edu or by telephone at (845) Written Comments or Statements: relative to the following U.S. Patent
938–4200. Pursuant to 41 CFR 102–3.105(j) and Application Titled ’’ Optically
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 102–3.140 and section 10(a)(3) of the Transparent, Radio Frequency, Planar
committee meeting is being held under Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Transmission Lines’’: United States
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

the provisions of the Federal Advisory public or interested organizations may Utility Patent Application Serial No. US
Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C., submit written comments or statements 14/247,380.
Appendix, as amended), the to the committee, in response to the DATES: The prospective exclusive
Government in the Sunshine Act of stated agenda of the open meeting or in license may be granted unless within
1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and regard to the committee’s mission in fifteen (15) days from the date of this
41 CFR 102–3.150. general. Written comments or published notice, the U.S. Army
Purpose of the Meeting: This is the statements should be submitted to Mrs. Research Laboratory receives written
2015 Summer Meeting of the USMA Ghostlaw, the committee Designated objections including evidence and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Jun 29, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM 30JNN1

Document Created: 2018-02-22 11:16:51
Document Modified: 2018-02-22 11:16:51

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Notice and request for information.
Dates		Written comments are encouraged and must be received on or before August 31, 2015 to be assured of consideration.
Contact		For submission process questions please contact Monica Jackson, Office of Executive Secretary, at 202- 435-7275. For inquires related to the substance of this request, please contact Christopher Johnson, Acting Assistant Director of the Office of Consumer Response at 202-435-7455 or [email protected]
FR Citation		80 FR 37237