80 FR 37299 - Certain Toner Cartridges and Components; Commission Determination To Review in Part an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion for Summary Determination of Violation of Section 337 and, on Review, To Modify Certain Portions of the Initial Determination; Request for Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 125 (June 30, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 125 (June 30, 2015)
| Page Range | 37299-37301 | |
| FR Document | 2015-15970 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 125 (Tuesday, June 30, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 37299-37301] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-15970] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337-TA-918] Certain Toner Cartridges and Components; Commission Determination To Review in Part an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion for Summary Determination of Violation of Section 337 and, on Review, To Modify Certain Portions of the Initial Determination; Request for Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review in part an initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 34) of the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') granting complainants' motion for summary determination of violation of section 337 and, on review, to modify certain portions of the ID. The Commission also requests written submissions on remedy, public interest, [[Page 37300]] and bonding in accordance with the schedule provided below. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3115. Copies of non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov . The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (``Section 337''), on June 12, 2014, based on a complaint filed by Canon Inc. of Tokyo, Japan; Canon U.S.A., Inc. of Melville, New York; and Canon Virginia, Inc. of Newport News, Virginia (collectively, ``Canon''). 79 FR 33777-78 (Jun. 12, 2014). The complaint alleges a violation of section 337 by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,280,278 (``the `278 patent''); 8,630,564 (``the `564 patent''); 8,682,215 (``the `215 patent''); 8,676,090 (``the `090 patent''); 8,369,744 (``the `744 patent''); 8,565,640 (``the `640 patent''); 8,676,085 (``the `085 patent''); 8,135,304 (``the `304 patent''); and 8,688,008 (``the `008 patent''). Id. The notice of investigation named thirty-three companies as respondents. Id. The Commission's Office of Unfair Import Investigations was also named as a party. Subsequently, the investigation was partially terminated based on withdrawal of the complaint as to all asserted claims of four patents, specifically: (1) Claim 1 of the `744 patent; (2) claim 1 of the `640 patent; (3) claims 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the `085 patent; and (4) claim 1 of the `304 patent. The ALJ issued initial determinations terminating the investigation based on consent orders as to fifteen respondents: Print-Rite Holdings Ltd.; Print-Rite N.A., Inc.; Union Technology Int'I (M.C.O.) Co. Ltd.; Print-Rite Unicorn Image Products Co. Ltd.; Innotex Precision Ltd.; Ninestar Image Tech Limited; Zhuhai Seine Technology Co., Ltd.; Ninestar Technology Company, Ltd.; Seine Tech (USA) Co., Ltd.; Nano Pacific Corporation; International Laser Group, Inc.; Ink Technologies Printer Supplies, LLC; LD Products, Inc.; Linkyo Corporation; and Katun Corporation. See ALJ Order Nos. 13 (not reviewed Nov. 4, 2014), 16 (not reviewed Nov. 24, 2014), 28 (not reviewed Apr. 3, 2015), 29 (not reviewed Apr. 3, 2015), 30 (not reviewed Apr. 3, 2015), 31 (not reviewed Apr. 3, 2015), and 32 (not reviewed Apr. 3, 2015). The ALJ also issued an ID terminating the investigation based on Canon's withdrawal of allegations as to two respondents, Seine Image Int'l Co., Ltd. and Ninestar Image Tech, Ltd. See ALJ Order No. 4 (not reviewed Aug. 1, 2014). Likewise, the ALJ issued an ID terminating the investigation as to respondent Seine Image (USA) Co., Ltd. due to the corporate dissolution of the respondent. See ALJ Order No. 27 (not reviewed Apr. 1, 2015). These eighteen respondents are collectively referred to as the ``Terminated Respondents.'' The ALJ also issued IDs finding the following ten respondents in default: Acecom, Inc.-San Antonio; ACM Technologies, Inc.; Shenzhen ASTA Official Consumable Co., Ltd.; Do It Wiser LLC; Grand Image Inc.; Green Project, Inc.; Nectron International, Inc.; Online Tech Stores, LLC; Printronic Corporation; and Zinyaw LLC. See Order Nos. 6 (not reviewed Aug. 25, 2014), 12 (not reviewed Oct. 1, 2014), 15 (not reviewed Nov. 17, 2014). These ten respondents are collectively referred to as the ``Defaulting Respondents.'' The remaining five named respondents are Aster Graphics, Inc.; Jiangxi Yibo E-Tech Co., Ltd.; Aster Graphics Co., Ltd.; The Supplies Guys, LLC; and American Internet Holdings, LLC. These respondents are no longer actively participating in the investigation, but have neither been terminated from the investigation nor found to be in default. Each of them has acknowledged and stipulated that it has failed to act within the meaning of Commission Rule 210.17, at least because it failed to file a prehearing statement and brief in accordance with the Procedural Schedule (Order No. 9), and that it therefore has no standing to contest Canon's evidence and arguments that it has violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337. See Stipulation Regarding the Status of the Aster and Supplies Guys Respondents (Feb. 26, 2015). These five respondents are collectively referred to as the ``Non-Participating Respondents.'' On March 10, 2015, Canon filed a Motion for Summary Determination of Violations by the Defaulting Respondents and Non-Participating Respondents and Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bonding. The Commission investigative attorney filed a response in support of the motion. The Non-Participating Respondents filed a response (``Aster Resp.'') to the motion in which they state, inter alia, that they ``do not oppose the motion for summary determination.'' Aster Resp. at 1. On May 12, 2015, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 34) granting Canon's motion for summary determination of violation and recommending the issuance of a general exclusion order and several cease and desist orders. No party petitioned for review of the ID. The Commission has determined to review the portion of the ID titled ``Establishing Violations Of Section 337 Through Uncontested Allegations'' on pages 46-50 of the ID and, on review, to strike the above-referenced portion of the ID, as well as any language referring to that stricken portion (e.g., ``The uncontested allegations and adverse inferences aside,'' in the first sentence of the last paragraph on page 50), as irrelevant in reaching the ALJ's violation determination. See ID at 46-50. The Commission has also determined to strike any references to uncontested allegations as submitted evidence on violation (e.g., ``; see also Complaint ]] 160-161 (uncontested allegations)'' in the third line of page 56). The finding of violation as to these respondents is based on substantial, reliable, and probative evidence. See 19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(2). The Commission has also determined to correct a typographical error in the second sentence on page 33 of the ID by substituting ``four'' instead of ``three'' in the above-referenced sentence. The Commission has further determined to modify the citation in the first full paragraph on page 42 of the ID by striking an incorrect citation to Certain Flooring Products, Inv. No. 337-TA-443, Comm'n Notice of Final Determination of No Violation of Section 337, 2002 WL 448690, at*59, (Mar. 22, 2002). This document has only three pages. The Commission has also determined to supplement an incomplete citation to Enercon GmbH v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 151 F.3d 1376 (Fed. Cir. 1998) with the relevant page number, i.e., Enercon GmbH v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 151 F.3d 1376, 1384 (Fed. Cir. 1998). The Commission has determined not to review the remainder of the ID. [[Page 37301]] In connection with the final disposition of this investigation, the Commission may (1) issue an order that could result in the exclusion of the subject articles from entry into the United States, and/or (2) issue one or more cease and desist orders that could result in the respondent being required to cease and desist from engaging in unfair acts in the importation and sale of such articles. Accordingly, the Commission is interested in receiving written submissions that address the form of remedy, if any, that should be ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an article from entry into the United States for purposes other than entry for consumption, the party should so indicate and provide information establishing that activities involving other types of entry either are adversely affecting it or are likely to do so. For background, see Certain Devices for Connecting Computers via Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337-TA-360, USITC Pub. No. 2843 (Dec. 1994) (Commission Opinion). If the Commission contemplates some form of remedy, it must consider the effects of that remedy upon the public interest. The factors the Commission will consider include the effect that an exclusion order and/or cease and desist orders would have on (1) the public health and welfare, (2) competitive conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S. production of articles that are like or directly competitive with those that are subject to investigation, and (4) U.S. consumers. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving written submissions that address the aforementioned public interest factors in the context of this investigation. If the Commission orders some form of remedy, the U.S. Trade Representative, as delegated by the President, has 60 days to approve or disapprove the Commission's action. During this period, the subject articles would be entitled to enter the United States under bond, in an amount determined by the Commission and prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving submissions concerning the amount of the bond that should be imposed if a remedy is ordered. Written Submissions: Parties to the investigation, interested government agencies, and any other interested parties are encouraged to file written submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. Canon and the IA are also requested to submit proposed remedial orders for the Commission's consideration. Canon is further requested to provide the expiration dates of the `278 patent, the `564 patent, the `215 patent, the `090 patent, and the `008 patent, and state the HTSUS subheadings under which the accused articles are imported. Canon is also requested to supply the names of known importers. The written submissions and proposed remedial orders must be filed no later than the close of business on July 13, 2015. Reply submissions must be filed no later than the close of business on July 20, 2015. Such submissions should address the ALJ's recommended determinations on remedy and bonding which were made in Order No. 34. No further submissions on these issues will be permitted unless otherwise ordered by the Commission. Persons filing written submissions must file the original document electronically on or before the deadlines stated above and submit 8 true paper copies to the Office of the Secretary by noon the next day pursuant to section 210.4(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to the investigation number (``Inv. No. 337-TA-918'') in a prominent place on the cover page and/or the first page. (See Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). Persons with questions regarding filing should contact the Secretary (202-205-2000). Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. A redacted non-confidential version of the document must also be filed simultaneously with any confidential filing. All non-confidential written submissions will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary and on EDIS. The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: June 24, 2015. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2015-15970 Filed 6-29-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 125 / Tuesday, June 30, 2015 / Notices 37299
with the local governing entities’ balance due must be made a minimum nearby properties. When conveyed out
transportation plans; and of two weeks prior to the payment date. of Federal ownership, the lands will be
5. An appropriate indemnification Failure to pay the full bid price prior to subject to any applicable laws,
clause protecting the United States from the expiration of the 180th day will regulations, and policies of the
claims arising out of the lessees/ disqualify the high bidder and cause the applicable local government for
patentee’s use, occupancy, or entire 20 percent bid deposit to be proposed future uses. It is the
occupations on the leased/patented forfeited to the BLM. Forfeiture of the 20 responsibility of the purchaser to be
lands. percent bid deposit is in accordance aware through due diligence of those
Pursuant to the requirements with 43 CFR 2711.3–1(d). No exceptions laws, regulations, and policies, and to
established by Section 120(h) of the will be made. The BLM cannot accept seek any required local approvals for
Comprehensive Environmental the remainder of the bid price after the future uses. Buyers should make
Response, Compensation and Liability 180th day of the sale date. themselves aware of any Federal or
Act, 42 U.S.C. 9620(h) (CERCLA), as The BLM will not sign any documents State law or regulation that may affect
amended, notice is hereby given that the related to 1031 Exchange transactions. the future use of the property. Any land
lands have been examined and no The timing for completion of such an lacking access from a public road or
evidence was found to indicate that any exchange is the bidder’s responsibility. highway will be conveyed as such, and
hazardous substances have been stored The BLM cannot be a party to any 1031 future access acquisition will be the
for one year or more, nor had any Exchange. responsibility of the buyer.
hazardous substances been disposed of In accordance with 43 CFR 2711.3– Any comments regarding the
or released on the subject property. 1(f), within 30 days the BLM may accept proposed sale will be reviewed by the
No warranty of any kind, express or or reject any or all offers to purchase, or BLM Nevada State Director or other
implied, is given by the United States as withdraw any parcel of land or interest authorized official of the Department of
to the title, whether or to what extent therein from sale if the BLM authorized the Interior, who may sustain, vacate, or
the land may be developed, its physical officer determines consummation of the modify this realty action in response to
condition, future uses, or any other sale would be inconsistent with any such comments. In the absence of any
circumstance or condition. The law, or for other reasons as may be comments, this realty action will
conveyance of a parcel will not be on a provided by applicable law or become the final determination of the
contingency basis. However, to the regulations. No contractual or other Department of the Interior.
extent required by law, the parcel is rights against the United States may
subject to the requirements of section accrue until the BLM officially accepts Authority: 43 CFR 2711.1–2.
120(h) of the CERCLA. the offer to purchase and the full bid Vanessa L. Hice,
Unless the BLM authorized officer price is paid. Assistant Field Manager, Division of Lands.
approved other satisfactory The parcel may be subject to land use
[FR Doc. 2015–16068 Filed 6–29–15; 8:45 am]
arrangements in advance, conveyance of applications received prior to
BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P
title will be through escrow. Designation publication of this Notice if processing
of the escrow agent will be through the application would have no adverse
mutual agreement between the BLM and effect on the marketability of title, or the
the prospective patentee, and costs of FMV of the parcel. Information INTERNATIONAL TRADE
escrow will be borne by the prospective concerning the sale, encumbrances of COMMISSION
patentee. record, appraisals, reservations,
[Investigation No. 337–TA–918]
The BLM–LVFO must receive the procedures and conditions, CERCLA,
request for escrow instructions prior to and other environmental documents Certain Toner Cartridges and
30 days before the prospective patentee that may appear in the BLM public files Components; Commission
has scheduled a closing date. There are for the proposed sale parcels are Determination To Review in Part an
no exceptions. available for review during business Initial Determination Granting
All name changes and supporting hours, 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Pacific Complainant’s Motion for Summary
documentation must be received at the Time, Monday through Friday, at the Determination of Violation of Section
BLM–LVFO 30 days from the date on BLM–LVFO, except during Federal 337 and, on Review, To Modify Certain
the high-bidder letter by 4:30 p.m. holidays. Portions of the Initial Determination;
Pacific Time. There are no exceptions. In order to determine the FMV Request for Written Submissions on
To submit a name change, the apparent through appraisal, certain extraordinary Remedy, the Public Interest, and
high bidder must submit the name assumptions and hypothetical Bonding
change in writing on the Certificate of conditions may have been made
Eligibility form to the BLM–LVFO. concerning the attributes and AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
The remainder of the full bid price for limitations of the lands and potential Commission.
the parcel must be received no later effects of local regulations and policies ACTION: Notice.
than 4:30 p.m. Pacific Time, within 180 on potential future land uses. Through
days following the day of the sale. publication of this Notice, the BLM SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
Payment must be submitted in the form advises that these assumptions may not the U.S. International Trade
of a certified check, postal money order, be endorsed or approved by units of Commission has determined to review
bank draft, cashier’s check, or made local government. in part an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
available by electronic fund transfer It is the buyer’s responsibility to be (Order No. 34) of the presiding
made payable in U.S. dollars to the aware of all applicable Federal, State, administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’)
‘‘Department of the Interior—Bureau of and local government laws, regulations granting complainants’ motion for
Land Management’’ to the BLM–LVFO. and policies that may affect the subject summary determination of violation of
The BLM will not accept personal or lands, including any required section 337 and, on review, to modify
company checks. dedication of lands for public uses. It is certain portions of the ID. The
Arrangements for electronic fund also the buyer’s responsibility to be Commission also requests written
transfer to the BLM for payment of the aware of existing or prospective uses of submissions on remedy, public interest,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Jun 29, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM 30JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_37424/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 125 / Tuesday, June 30, 2015 / Notices 37301
In connection with the final expiration dates of the ‘278 patent, the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
disposition of this investigation, the ‘564 patent, the ‘215 patent, the ‘090
Commission may (1) issue an order that patent, and the ‘008 patent, and state the Antitrust Division
could result in the exclusion of the HTSUS subheadings under which the
subject articles from entry into the accused articles are imported. Canon is Notice Pursuant to the National
United States, and/or (2) issue one or also requested to supply the names of Cooperative Research and Production
more cease and desist orders that could known importers. The written Act of 1993—Trustworthy
result in the respondent being required submissions and proposed remedial Accountability Group, Inc.
to cease and desist from engaging in orders must be filed no later than the Notice is hereby given that, on May
unfair acts in the importation and sale close of business on July 13, 2015. Reply 29, 2015, pursuant to section 6(a) of the
of such articles. Accordingly, the submissions must be filed no later than National Cooperative Research and
Commission is interested in receiving the close of business on July 20, 2015. Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
written submissions that address the Such submissions should address the et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Trustworthy
form of remedy, if any, that should be ALJ’s recommended determinations on Accountability Group, Inc. (‘‘TAG’’) has
ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an remedy and bonding which were made filed written notifications
article from entry into the United States in Order No. 34. No further submissions simultaneously with the Attorney
for purposes other than entry for on these issues will be permitted unless General and the Federal Trade
consumption, the party should so otherwise ordered by the Commission. Commission disclosing (1) the name and
indicate and provide information Persons filing written submissions
principal place of business of the
establishing that activities involving must file the original document
standards development organization
other types of entry either are adversely electronically on or before the deadlines
and (2) the nature and scope of its
affecting it or are likely to do so. For stated above and submit 8 true paper
standards development activities. The
background, see Certain Devices for copies to the Office of the Secretary by
noon the next day pursuant to section notifications were filed for the purpose
Connecting Computers via Telephone
210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of of invoking the Act’s provisions limiting
Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360, USITC
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to
Pub. No. 2843 (Dec. 1994) (Commission
210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to actual damages under specified
Opinion).
If the Commission contemplates some the investigation number (‘‘Inv. No. circumstances.
Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the
form of remedy, it must consider the 337–TA–918’’) in a prominent place on
effects of that remedy upon the public name and principal place of business of
the cover page and/or the first page. (See
interest. The factors the Commission the standards development organization
Handbook for Electronic Filing
will consider include the effect that an is: Trustworthy Accountability Group,
Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/
exclusion order and/or cease and desist Inc., New York, NY. The nature and
secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/
orders would have on (1) the public scope of TAG’s standards development
handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf).
health and welfare, (2) competitive activities are: to address systemic
Persons with questions regarding filing
conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S. market issues in four core areas:
should contact the Secretary (202–205–
production of articles that are like or fraudulent digital advertising traffic, ad-
2000).
directly competitive with those that are Any person desiring to submit a supported Internet piracy, business
subject to investigation, and (4) U.S. document to the Commission in transparency and malware. TAG will
consumers. The Commission is confidence must request confidential establish standards to address
therefore interested in receiving written treatment. All such requests should be fraudulent digital advertising in the
submissions that address the directed to the Secretary to the supply chain and will connect those
aforementioned public interest factors Commission and must include a full standards to tools for identifying
in the context of this investigation. statement of the reasons why the legitimate companies (i.e., those
If the Commission orders some form Commission should grant such companies not associated with
of remedy, the U.S. Trade treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents fraudulent conduct) and fraudulent
Representative, as delegated by the for which confidential treatment by the activity, including but not limited to,
President, has 60 days to approve or Commission is properly sought will be market participant submissions to TAG
disapprove the Commission’s action. treated accordingly. A redacted non- of domain names involved with known
During this period, the subject articles confidential version of the document fraudulent conduct which will be
would be entitled to enter the United must also be filed simultaneously with curated into a frequently updated list.
States under bond, in an amount any confidential filing. All non- TAG’s anti-piracy standards will
determined by the Commission and confidential written submissions will be involve the validation of digital
prescribed by the Secretary of the available for public inspection at the advertising assurance providers (and
Treasury. The Commission is therefore Office of the Secretary and on EDIS. others who enter the market) to ensure
interested in receiving submissions The authority for the Commission’s they effectively provide the services
concerning the amount of the bond that determination is contained in section they purport to offer. TAG will also
should be imposed if a remedy is 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as develop standards to increase
ordered. amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part transparency in the digital advertising
Written Submissions: Parties to the 210 of the Commission’s Rules of supply chain through guidelines
investigation, interested government concerning programmatic selling, as
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
agencies, and any other interested 210). well as the disclosure of information
parties are encouraged to file written between buyers and sellers. TAG’s
By order of the Commission.
submissions on the issues of remedy, standards development activity will also
Issued: June 24, 2015.
the public interest, and bonding. Canon include guidance for market
Lisa R. Barton,
and the IA are also requested to submit participants to address the problem of
proposed remedial orders for the Secretary to the Commission. malware by setting best practices and
Commission’s consideration. Canon is [FR Doc. 2015–15970 Filed 6–29–15; 8:45 am] sharing malware data for curation by
further requested to provide the BILLING CODE 7020–02–P TAG, as well as identification and
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:34 Jun 29, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM 30JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_37424/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-22 11:16:40
Document Modified: 2018-02-22 11:16:40
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice. | |
| Contact | Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3115. Copies of non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov . The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 37299 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR