80 FR 37583 - Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 126 (July 1, 2015)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 126 (July 1, 2015)
| Page Range | 37583-37586 | |
| FR Document | 2015-16203 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 126 (Wednesday, July 1, 2015)] [Notices] [Pages 37583-37586] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-16203] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735. Background Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), may request, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213, that the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') conduct an administrative review of that antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation. All deadlines for the submission of comments or actions by the Department discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from the applicable starting date. Respondent Selection In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for individual [[Page 37584]] examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to requests made for the orders identified below, the Department intends to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') data for U.S. imports during the period of review. We intend to release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (``APO'') to all parties having an APO within five days of publication of the initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent selection within 21 days of publication of the initiation Federal Register notice. Therefore, we encourage all parties interested in commenting on respondent selection to submit their APO applications on the date of publication of the initiation notice, or as soon thereafter as possible. The Department invites comments regarding the CBP data and respondent selection within five days of placement of the CBP data on the record of the review. In the event the Department decides it is necessary to limit individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: In general, the Department finds that determinations concerning whether particular companies should be ``collapsed'' (i.e., treated as a single entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates) require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis, which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, the Department will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent selection phase of this review and will not collapse companies at the respondent selection phase unless there has been a determination to collapse certain companies in a previous segment of this antidumping proceeding (i.e., investigation, administrative review, new shipper review or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to this review, if the Department determined, or continued to treat, that company as collapsed with others, the Department will assume that such companies continue to operate in the same manner and will collapse them for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, the Department will not collapse companies for purposes of respondent selection. Parties are requested to (a) identify which companies subject to review previously were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation to the proceeding in which they were collapsed. Further, if companies are requested to complete the Quantity and Value Questionnaire for purposes of respondent selection, in general each company must report volume and value data separately for itself. Parties should not include data for any other party, even if they believe they should be treated as a single entity with that other party. If a company was collapsed with another company or companies in the most recently completed segment of this proceeding where the Department considered collapsing that entity, complete quantity and value data for that collapsed entity must be submitted. Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that requests a review may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The regulation provides that the Department may extend this time if it is reasonable to do so. In order to provide parties additional certainty with respect to when the Department will exercise its discretion to extend this 90- day deadline, interested parties are advised that, with regard to reviews requested on the basis of anniversary months on or after July 2015, the Department does not intend to extend the 90-day deadline unless the requestor demonstrates that an extraordinary circumstance prevented it from submitting a timely withdrawal request. Determinations by the Department to extend the 90-day deadline will be made on a case-by-case basis. The Department is providing this notice on its Web site, as well as in its ``Opportunity to Request Administrative Review'' notices, so that interested parties will be aware of the manner in which the Department intends to exercise its discretion in the future. Opportunity to Request a Review: Not later than the last day of July 2015,\1\ interested parties may request administrative review of the following orders, findings, or suspended investigations, with anniversary dates in July for the following periods: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Or the next business day, if the deadline falls on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day when the Department is closed. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Period of review ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Antidumping Duty Proceedings FINLAND: Carboxymethylcellulose, A-405-803........... 7/1/14-6/30/15 INDIA: Polyethylene Terephthalate (Pet) Film, A-533- 7/1/14-6/30/15 824................................................. IRAN: In-Shell Pistachios, A-507-502................. 7/1/14-6/30/15 ITALY: Certain Pasta, A-475-818...................... 7/1/14-6/30/15 JAPAN: Clad Steel Plate, A-588-838...................... 7/1/14-6/30/15 Polyvinyl Alcohol, A-588-861..................... 7/1/14-6/30/15 Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils, A-588- 7/1/14-6/30/15 845............................................. MALAYSIA: Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe, A-557-815.. 1/7/14-6/30/15 NETHERLANDS: Carboxymethylcellulose, A-421-811....... 7/1/14-6/30/15 REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in 7/1/14-6/30/15 Coils, A-580-834.................................... RUSSIA: Solid Urea, A-821-801........................ 7/1/14-6/30/15 SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM: Welded Stainless 1/7/14-6/30/15 Pressure Pipe, A-552-816............................ TAIWAN: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, A-583-837....... 7/1/14-6/30/15 Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils, A-583- 7/1/14-6/30/15 831............................................. THAILAND: Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings, A-549-807.. 7/1/14-6/30/15 Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe, A-549-830........ 1/7/14-6/30/15 THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings, A-570-814.. 7/1/14-6/30/15 Certain Potassium Phosphate Salts, A-570-962..... 7/1/14-6/30/15 Certain Steel Grating, A-570-947................. 7/1/14-6/30/15 [[Page 37585]] Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe, A-570- 7/1/14-6/30/15 910............................................. Persulfates, A-570-847........................... 7/1/14-6/30/15 Xanthan Gum, A-570-985........................... 7/1/14-6/30/15 TURKEY: Certain Pasta, A-489-805..................... 7/1/14-6/30/15 UKRAINE: Solid Urea, A-823-801....................... 7/1/14-6/30/15 Countervailing Duty Proceedings INDIA: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, C-533-825.... 1/1/14-12/31/14 ITALY: Certain Pasta, C-475-819...................... 1/1/14-12/31/14 THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Certain Potassium Phosphate Salts, C-570-963..... 1/1/14-12/31/14 Certain Steel Grating, C-570-948................. 1/1/14-12/31/14 Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe, C-570- 1/1/14-12/31/14 911............................................. Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand, C-570-946 1/1/14-12/31/14 TURKEY: Certain Pasta, C-489-806..................... 1/1/14-12/31/14 Suspension Agreements UKRAINE: Oil Country Tubular Goods, A-823-815........ 7/1/14-6/30/15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), an interested party as defined by section 771(9) of the Act may request in writing that the Secretary conduct an administrative review. For both antidumping and countervailing duty reviews, the interested party must specify the individual producers or exporters covered by an antidumping finding or an antidumping or countervailing duty order or suspension agreement for which it is requesting a review. In addition, a domestic interested party or an interested party described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act must state why it desires the Secretary to review those particular producers or exporters. If the interested party intends for the Secretary to review sales of merchandise by an exporter (or a producer if that producer also exports merchandise from other suppliers) which was produced in more than one country of origin and each country of origin is subject to a separate order, then the interested party must state specifically, on an order-by-order basis, which exporter(s) the request is intended to cover. Note that, for any party the Department was unable to locate in prior segments, the Department will not accept a request for an administrative review of that party absent new information as to the party's location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to determine if the interested party's attempts were reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii). As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non- Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) the Department clarified its practice with respect to the collection of final antidumping duties on imports of merchandise where intermediate firms are involved. The public should be aware of this clarification in determining whether to request an administrative review of merchandise subject to antidumping findings and orders.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Further, as explained in Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013), the Department clarified its practice with regard to the conditional review of the non-market economy (NME) entity in administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders. The Department will no longer consider the NME entity as an exporter conditionally subject to administrative reviews. Accordingly, the NME entity will not be under review unless the Department specifically receives a request for, or self-initiates, a review of the NME entity.\3\ In administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders on merchandise from NME countries where a review of the NME entity has not been initiated, but where an individual exporter for which a review was initiated does not qualify for a separate rate, the Department will issue a final decision indicating that the company in question is part of the NME entity. However, in that situation, because no review of the NME entity was conducted, the NME entity's entries were not subject to the review and the rate for the NME entity is not subject to change as a result of that review (although the rate for the individual exporter may change as a function of the finding that the exporter is part of the NME entity). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties should specify that they are requesting a review of entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to the extent possible, include the names of such exporters in their request. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Following initiation of an antidumping administrative review when there is no review requested of the NME entity, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all exporters not named in the initiation notice, including those that were suspended at the NME entity rate. All requests must be filed electronically in Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS'') on Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS Web site at http://access.trade.gov.\4\ Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request must be served on the petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department will publish in the Federal Register a notice of ``Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation'' for requests received by the last day of July 2015. If the Department does not receive, by the last day of July 2015, a request for review of entries covered by an order, finding, or [[Page 37586]] suspended investigation listed in this notice and for the period identified above, the Department will instruct CBP to assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or bond for) estimated antidumping or countervailing duties required on those entries at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to continue to collect the cash deposit previously ordered. For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ``gap'' period of the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the period of review. This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: June 25, 2015. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2015-16203 Filed 6-30-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 126 / Wednesday, July 1, 2015 / Notices 37583
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Census covering the manufacturing (including hours and cost) of the
sector and the Annual Survey of proposed collection of information; (c)
Census Bureau Manufactures (ASM) provide annual ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
benchmarks for the shipments and clarity of the information to be
Proposed Information Collection; inventory data in this monthly survey. collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
Comment Request; Manufacturers’ The Manufacturers’ Unfilled Orders burden of the collection of information
Unfilled Orders Survey Survey, the subject of this notice, on respondents, including through the
AGENCY: U.S. Census Bureau, provides an annual benchmark for use of automated collection techniques
Commerce. unfilled orders. or other forms of information
ACTION: Notice. The Census Bureau uses this data to technology.
develop universe estimates of unfilled Comments submitted in response to
SUMMARY: The Department of orders as of the end of the calendar year this notice will be summarized and/or
Commerce, as part of its continuing and to adjust the monthly M3 data on included in the request for OMB
effort to reduce paperwork and unfilled orders to these levels on the approval of this information collection;
respondent burden, invites the general North American Industrial they also will become a matter of public
public and other Federal agencies to Classification System (NAICS) basis. record.
take this opportunity to comment on The benchmarked unfilled orders levels
Sheleen Dumas,
proposed and/or continuing information are used to derive estimates of new
collections, as required by the Departmental PRA Lead, Office of the Chief
orders received by manufacturers. The Information Officer.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. survey data are also used to determine
[FR Doc. 2015–16158 Filed 6–30–15; 8:45 am]
DATES: To ensure consideration, written whether it is necessary to collect
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
comments must be submitted on or unfilled orders data for specific
before August 31, 2015. industries on a monthly basis; some
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments industries are not requested to provide
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental unfilled orders data on the M3 Survey.
Paperwork Clearance Officer, There are no changes to the MA–3000 International Trade Administration
Department of Commerce, Room 6616, form.
14th and Constitution Avenue NW., II. Method of Collection Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Order, Finding, or Suspended
Internet at jjessup@doc.gov). The Census Bureau will use mail out/ Investigation; Opportunity To Request
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
mail back survey forms to collect the Administrative Review
Requests for additional information or data with online reporting encouraged.
Online response for the survey is AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
copies of the information collection International Trade Administration,
instrument(s) and instructions should typically just under 60 percent.
Companies are asked to respond to the Department of Commerce.
be directed to Mary Catherine Potter,
survey within 30 days of receipt. Letters FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
U.S. Census Bureau, Economic
encouraging participation are mailed to Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD
Indicators Division, 4600 Silver Hill
companies that have not responded by Operations, Customs Liaison Unit,
Road, Room 7K157, Washington, DC
the designated time. Telephone follow- Enforcement and Compliance,
20233–6913, (301) 763–4207, or
up is conducted to obtain response from International Trade Administration,
(via the internet at
delinquent companies. U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
mary.catherine.potter@census.gov.)
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: III. Data Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202)
I. Abstract OMB Control Number: 0607–0561. 482–4735.
Form Number(s): MA–3000.
The Manufacturers’ Shipments, Type of Review: Regular submission. Background
Inventories, and Orders (M3) survey Affected Public: Manufacturing Each year during the anniversary
collects monthly data on the value of Businesses, large and small, or other for- month of the publication of an
shipments, inventories, and new and profit organizations. antidumping or countervailing duty
unfilled orders from manufacturing Estimated Number of Respondents: order, finding, or suspended
companies. The orders, as well as the 6,000. investigation, an interested party, as
shipments and inventory data, are Estimated Time per Response: .50 defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff
valuable tools for analysts of business hour. Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
cycle conditions. The Bureau of Estimated Total Annual Burden may request, in accordance with 19 CFR
Economic Analysis, the Counsel of Hours: 3,000. 351.213, that the Department of
Economic Advisors, the Federal Reserve Estimated Total Annual Cost to Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) conduct
Board, the Conference Board, and Public: $0. an administrative review of that
members of the business community Respondents Obligation: Mandatory. antidumping or countervailing duty
such as the National Association of Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C., order, finding, or suspended
Manufacturers, Wall Street Journal, Sections 131, 182, 224 and 225. investigation.
Market Watch, and Bloomberg business All deadlines for the submission of
IV. Request for Comments
analysts, use the data. comments or actions by the Department
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The monthly M3 Survey estimates are Comments are invited on: (a) Whether discussed below refer to the number of
based on a relatively small sample that the proposed collection of information calendar days from the applicable
primarily reflects the month-to-month is necessary for the proper performance starting date.
changes of large companies. There is a of the functions of the agency, including
clear need for periodic benchmarking of whether the information shall have Respondent Selection
the M3 estimates to reflect the practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the In the event the Department limits the
manufacturing universe. The Economic agency’s estimate of the burden number of respondents for individual
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Jun 30, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_37709/page/1.svg)
![37586 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 126 / Wednesday, July 1, 2015 / Notices
suspended investigation listed in this DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE For information from the Commission
notice and for the period identified contact Mary Messer, Office of
above, the Department will instruct CBP International Trade Administration Investigations, U.S. International Trade
to assess antidumping or countervailing Commission at (202) 205–3193.
duties on those entries at a rate equal to Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’)
Review SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
the cash deposit of (or bond for)
estimated antidumping or AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Background
countervailing duties required on those International Trade Administration,
entries at the time of entry, or Department of Commerce. The Department’s procedures for the
withdrawal from warehouse, for SUMMARY: In accordance with section conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth
consumption and to continue to collect 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as in its Procedures for Conducting Five-
the cash deposit previously ordered. amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of
For the first administrative review of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
any order, there will be no assessment automatically initiating the five-year Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998)
of antidumping or countervailing duties review (‘‘Sunset Review’’) of the and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005).
on entries of subject merchandise antidumping and countervailing duty Guidance on methodological or
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, (‘‘AD/CVD’’) orders listed below. The analytical issues relevant to the
for consumption during the relevant International Trade Commission (‘‘the Department’s conduct of Sunset
provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of Commission’’) is publishing Reviews is set forth in Antidumping
the order, if such a gap period is concurrently with this notice its notice Proceedings: Calculation of the
applicable to the period of review. of Institution of Five-Year Review which Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
covers the same orders. Assessment Rate in Certain
This notice is not required by statute Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final
DATES: Effective Date: July 1, 2015.
but is published as a service to the Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
international trading community. 2012).
Department official identified in the
Dated: June 25, 2015. Initiation of Review section below at Initiation of Review
Christian Marsh, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping Compliance, International Trade In accordance with 19 CFR
and Countervailing Duty Operations. Administration, U.S. Department of 351.218(c), we are initiating Sunset
[FR Doc. 2015–16203 Filed 6–30–15; 8:45 am] Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Reviews of the following antidumping
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. and countervailing duty orders:
DOC case No. ITC case No. Country Product Department contact
A–570–951 ................... 731–TA–1163 .............. PRC .................. Woven Electric Blankets (1st Re- Matthew Renkey (202) 482–2312.
view).
Filing Information Revised Factual Information 2013), which modified two regulations
Requirements related to antidumping and
As a courtesy, we are making countervailing duty proceedings: The
This notice serves as a reminder that
information related to sunset definition of factual information (19
any party submitting factual information
proceedings, including copies of the CFR 351.102(b)(21), and the time limits
in an AD/CVD proceeding must certify
pertinent statute and Department’s to the accuracy and completeness of that for the submission of factual
regulations, the Department’s schedule information.2 Parties are hereby information (19 CFR 351.301). The final
for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past reminded that revised certification rule identifies five categories of factual
revocations and continuations, and requirements are in effect for company/ information in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21),
current service lists, available to the government officials as well as their which are summarized as follows: (i)
public on the Department’s Web site at representatives in all AD/CVD Evidence submitted in response to
the following address: ‘‘http:// investigations or proceedings initiated questionnaires; (ii) evidence submitted
enforcement.trade.gov/sunset/.’’ All on or after August 16, 2013.3 The in support of allegations; (iii) publicly
submissions in these Sunset Reviews formats for the revised certifications are available information to value factors
must be filed in accordance with the provided at the end of the Final Rule. under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure
Department’s regulations regarding The Department intends to reject factual the adequacy of remuneration under 19
format, translation, and service of submissions if the submitting party does CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed
documents. These rules, including not comply with the revised on the record by the Department; and (v)
electronic filing requirements via certification requirements. evidence other than factual information
Enforcement and Compliance’s On April 10, 2013, the Department described in (i)–(iv). The final rule
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty published Definition of Factual requires any party, when submitting
Centralized Electronic Service System Information and Time Limits for factual information, to specify under
(‘‘ACCESS’’), can be found at 19 CFR Submission of Factual Information: which subsection of 19 CFR
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
351.303.1 Final Rule, 78 FR 21246 (April 10, 351.102(b)(21) the information is being
submitted and, if the information is
2 See
section 782(b) of the Act. submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct
3 See
Certification of Factual Information To
1 Seealso Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
factual information already on the
Import Administration During Antidumping and
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July
record, to provide an explanation
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 17, 2013) (‘‘Final Rule’’) (amending 19 CFR identifying the information already on
76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). 351.303(g)). the record that the factual information
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Jun 30, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_37709/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2015-12-15 13:19:49
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 13:19:49
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735. | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 37583 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR