80 FR 41104 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Market Data Section of Its Fee Schedule

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 134 (July 14, 2015)

Page Range		41104-41109
FR Document		2015-17175
Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 134 (Tuesday, July 14, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 134 (Tuesday, July 14, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41104-41109]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17175]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-75397; File No. SR-EDGX-2015-28]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend 
the Market Data Section of Its Fee Schedule

July 8, 2015.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on July 1, 2015, EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or 
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as one establishing or 
changing a member due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange 
under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) 
thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposed rule change effective upon 
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to 
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the 
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange filed a proposal to amend the Market Data section of 
its fee schedule to: (i) Adopt User fees, an Enterprise fee, and a 
Digital Media Enterprise fee for the EDGX Top and EDGX Last Sale feeds; 
and (ii) make a non-substantive change to the description of the BATS 
One Feed Enterprise Fee as well as correct a cross-reference within the 
definition of ``Non-Professional User''.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's 
Web site at www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the 
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the Market Data section of its fee 
schedule to: (i) Adopt User fees, an Enterprise fee, and a Digital 
Media Enterprise fee for the EDGX Top and EDGX Last Sale feeds; and 
(ii) make a non-substantive change to the description of the BATS One 
Feed Enterprise Fee as well as correct a cross-reference within the 
definition of ``Non-Professional User''.
EDGX Top and Last Sale Fees
    EDGX Top is a market data feed that includes top of book quotations 
and execution information for all equity securities traded on the 
Exchange.\5\ EDGX Last Sale is a market data feed that includes last 
sale information for all equity securities traded on Exchange.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Exchange Rule 13.8(c).
    \6\ See Exchange Rule 13.8(d).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 41105]]

    Currently, the Exchange only charges fees for both internal and 
external distribution of the EDGX Last Sale and EDGX Top feeds. The 
cost of EDGX Last Sale for an Internal Distributor \7\ is $500 per 
month. Likewise, the cost of EDGX Top for an Internal Distributor is 
also $500 per month. The Exchange currently does not charge per User 
\8\ fees for either EDGX Last Sale or EDGX Top. Therefore, the Exchange 
does not currently require an External Distributor \9\ of EDGX Last 
Sale or EDGX Top to count, classify (e.g., professional or non-
professional), or report to the Exchange information regarding the 
customers to which they provide the data. Instead, the Exchange charges 
an External Distributor of EDGX Last Sale a flat fee of $1,250 per 
month. The Exchange also separately charges an External Distributor of 
EDGX Top a flat fee of $1,250 per month. End Users currently do not pay 
the Exchange for EDGX Last Sale or EDGX Top, nor are End Users required 
to enter into contracts with the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ An ``Internal Distributor'' is defined as ``a Distributor 
that receives the Exchange Market Data product and then distributes 
that data to one or more Users within the Distributor's own 
entity.'' See the Exchange Fee Schedule available at http://batstrading.com/support/fee_schedule/edgx/. A ``Distributor'' is 
defined as ``any entity that receives the Exchange Market Data 
product directly from the Exchange or indirectly through another 
entity and then distributes it internally or externally to a third 
party.'' Id.
    \8\ A ``User'' is defined as ``a natural person, a 
proprietorship, corporation, partnership, or entity, or device 
(computer or other automated service), that is entitled to receive 
Exchange data.'' Id.
    \9\ An ``External Distributor'' is defined as ``a Distributor 
that receives the Exchange Market Data product and then distributes 
that data to a third party or one or more Users outside the 
Distributor's own entity.'' Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Subscribers to either EDGX Top or EDGX Last Sale are able to 
receive, upon request and at no additional cost, EDGX Last Sale or EDGX 
Top, as applicable. The Exchange also offers a New External Distributor 
Credit under which new External Distributors of EDGX Top or EDGX Last 
Sale will not be charged a Distributor Fee for their first three (3) 
months.
    The Exchange now proposes to amend its fee schedule to incorporate 
additional fees related to the EDGX Top or EDGX Last Sale feeds.\10\ 
These fees include the following, each of which are described in detail 
below: (i) Usage Fees for both Professional \11\ and Non-Professional 
\12\ Users; \13\ (ii) Enterprise Fees; \14\ and (iii) a Digital Media 
Enterprise Fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The Exchange notes that EDGA Exchange, Inc. (``EDGA''), 
BATS Y-Exchange, Inc. (``BYX'') and BATS Exchange, Inc. (``BZX'', 
together with the Exchange, EDGA and BYX, the ``BATS Exchanges'') 
also filed proposed rule changes with Commission to adopt similar 
fees for their respective Top and Last Sale market data product. See 
File Nos. SR-EDGA-2015-25, SR-BYX-2015-30, and SR-BATS-2015-48. The 
Exchange represents that the proposed fees will not cause the 
combined cost of subscribing to each of the BATS Exchanges' 
individual Top and Last Sale feeds to be greater than those 
currently charged to subscribe to the BATS One Feed. See Securities 
Exchange Act Release Nos. 74285 (February 18, 2015), 80 FR 9828 
(February 24, 2015) (SR-BATS-2015-11); 74283 (February 18, 2015), 80 
FR 9809 (February 24, 2015) (SR-EDGA-2015-09); 74282 (February 17, 
2015), 80 FR 9487 (February 23, 2015) (SR-EDGX-2015-09); and 74284 
(February 18, 2015), 80 FR 9792 (February 24, 2015) (SR-BYX-2015-09) 
(``Initial BATS One Feed Fee Filings''). In these filings, the 
Exchange represented that the cost of subscribing to each of the 
underlying individual feeds necessary to create the BATS One Feed 
would not be greater than the cost of subscribing to the BATS One 
Feed. Id.
    \11\ A ``Professional User'' is defined as ``any User other than 
a Non-Professional User.'' See the Exchange Fee Schedule available 
at http://batstrading.com/support/fee_schedule/edgx/.
    \12\ A ``Non-Professional User'' is defined as ``a natural 
person who is not: (i) Registered or qualified in any capacity with 
the Commission, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, any state 
securities agency, any securities exchange or association, or any 
commodities or futures contract market or association; (ii) engaged 
as an ``investment adviser'' as that term is defined in Section 
[202(a)(11)] of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (whether or not 
registered or qualified under that Act); or (iii) employed by a bank 
or other organization exempt from registration under federal or 
state securities laws to perform functions that would require 
registration or qualification if such functions were performed for 
an organization not so exempt.'' Id.
    \13\ The Exchange notes that User fees as well as the 
distinctions based on professional and non-professional users have 
been previously filed with or approved by the Commission by the BATS 
Exchanges and the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq''). See 
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59582 (March 16, 2009), 74 FR 
12423 (March 24, 2009) (Order approving SR-Nasdaq-2008-102). See 
also the Initial BATS One Feed Fee Filings, supra note 10.
    \14\ The Exchange notes that Enterprise fees have been 
previously filed with or approved by the Commission by the Exchange, 
EDGA, BYX, BZX, Nasdaq, NYSE, and the CTA/CQ Plans. See Nasdaq Rule 
7047. Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 71507 (February 7, 2014), 
79 FR 8763 (February 13, 2014) (SR-NASDAQ-2014-011); 70211 (August 
15, 2013), 78 FR 51781 (August 21, 2013) (SR-NYSE-2013-58); and 
70010 (July 19, 2013) (File No. SR-CTA/CQ-2013-04). See also the 
Initial BATS One Feed Fee Filings, supra note 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    User Fees. The Exchange proposes to charge those who receive either 
EDGX Top or EDGX Last Sale from External Distributors different fees 
for both their Professional Users and Non-Professional Users. The 
Exchange will assess a monthly fee for Professional Users of $2.00 per 
User. Non-Professional Users will be assessed a monthly fee of $0.05 
per User.\15\ The Exchange does not propose to charge per User fees to 
Internal Distributors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ The Exchange notes that EDGA, BYX and BZX also filed 
proposed rule changes with Commission to adopt User fees for their 
respective Top and Last Sale market data product. See File Nos. SR-
EDGA-2015-25, SR-BYX-2015-30, and SR-BATS-2015-48 (proposing a 
monthly fee of $2.00 per Professional User and of $0.05 per Non-
Professional User for EDGA and BYX and a monthly fee of $4.00 per 
Professional User and of $0.10 per Non-Professional User for BZX). A 
vendor that wishes to create a product like the BATS One Summary 
Feed could subscribe to each of the BATS Exchanges' Top and Last 
Sale feeds. See the Initial BATS One Feed Fee Filings, supra note 
10. Should a vendor subscribe to each of the BATS Exchanges' Top and 
Last Sale feeds, it would be charged a total of $10.00 per month per 
Professional User and $0.25 per month per Non-Professional User. 
This amount is equal to, and not greater than the User Fees charged 
for the BATS One Summary Feed. Id. (adopting fees of $10.00 per 
month per Professional User and $0.25 per month per Non-Professional 
User as well as a separate $1,000 per month Data Consolidation Fee 
for the BATS One Summary Feed).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    External Distributors would be required to count every Professional 
User and Non-Professional User to which they provide EDGX Top and/or 
EDGX Last Sale, the requirements for which are identical to that 
currently in place for the BATS One Feed.\16\ Thus, the External 
Distributor's count will include every person and device that accesses 
the data regardless of the purpose for which the individual or device 
uses the data. External Distributors must report all Professional and 
Non-Professional Users in accordance with the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See the Initial BATS One Feed Fee Filings, supra note 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     In connection with an External Distributor's distribution 
of EDGX Top or EDGX Last Sale, the Distributor should count as one User 
each unique User that the Distributor has entitled to have access to 
EDGX Top or EDGX Last Sale. However, where a device is dedicated 
specifically to a single individual, the Distributor should count only 
the individual and need not count the device.
     The External Distributor should identify and report each 
unique User. If a User uses the same unique method to gain access to 
EDGX Top or EDGX Last Sale, the Distributor should count that as one 
User. However, if a unique User uses multiple methods to gain access to 
EDGX Top or EDGX Last Sale (e.g., a single User has multiple passwords 
and user identifications), the External Distributor should report all 
of those methods as an individual User.
     External Distributors should report each unique individual 
person who receives access through multiple devices as one User so long 
as each device is dedicated specifically to that individual.
     If an External Distributor entitles one or more 
individuals to use the same device, the External Distributor should 
include only the individuals, and not the device, in the count.
    Each External Distributor will receive a credit against its monthly 
Distributor

[[Page 41106]]

Fee for EDGX Top or EDGX Last Sale equal to the amount of its monthly 
Usage Fees up to a maximum of the Distributor Fee for EDGX Top or EDGX 
Last Sale. For example, an External Distributor will be subject to a 
$1,250 monthly Distributor Fee where they elect to receive EDGX Top. If 
that External Distributor reports User quantities totaling $1,250 or 
more of monthly usage of EDGX Top, it will pay no net Distributor Fee, 
whereas if that same External Distributor were to report User 
quantities totaling $1,000 of monthly usage, it will pay a net of $250 
for the Distributor Fee. External Distributors will remain subject to 
the per User fees discussed above. The same would apply to receipt of 
EDGX Last Sale.
    Enterprise Fee. The Exchange also proposes to establish a $15,000 
per month Enterprise Fee that will permit a recipient firm who receives 
EDGX Top or EDGX Last Sale from an External Distributor to receive the 
data for an unlimited number of Professional and Non-Professional 
Users.\17\ For example, if a recipient firm had 15,000 Professional 
Users who each receive EDGX Top or EDGX Last Sale at $2.00 per month, 
then that recipient firm will pay $30,000 per month in Professional 
Users fees. Under the proposed Enterprise Fee, the recipient firm will 
pay a flat fee of $15,000 for an unlimited number of Professional and 
Non-Professional Users for EDGX Top or EDGX Last Sale. A recipient firm 
must pay a separate Enterprise Fee for each External Distributor that 
controls display of EDGX Top or EDGX Last Sale if it wishes such User 
to be covered by an Enterprise Fee rather than by per User fees. A 
recipient firm that pays the Enterprise Fee will not have to report its 
number of such Users on a monthly basis. However, every six months, a 
recipient firm must provide the Exchange with a count of the total 
number of natural person users of each product, including both 
Professional and Non-Professional Users. Lastly, the proposed 
Enterprise Fee would be counted towards the Distributor Fee credit 
described above, under which an External Distributor receives a credit 
towards its Distributor Fee equal to the amount of its monthly EDGX Top 
or EDGX Last Sale usage fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ The Exchange notes that EDGA, BYX and BZX also filed 
proposed rule changes with Commission to adopt Enterprise Fees for 
their respective Top and Last Sale market data product. File Nos. 
SR-EDGA-2015-25, SR-BYX-2015-30, and SR-BATS-2015-48 (proposing a 
monthly Enterprise Fee of $15,000 for BZX Top and BZX Last Sale and 
$10,000 for EDGA Top and Last Sale as well as BYX Top and Last 
Sale). A vendor that wishes to create a product like the BATS One 
Summary Feed could subscribe to each of the BATS Exchanges' Top and 
Last Sale feeds. See the Initial BATS One Feed Fee Filings, supra 
note 10. Should a vendor subscribe to each of the BATS Exchanges' 
Top and Last Sale feeds, it would be charged a total monthly 
Enterprise Fee of $50,000. This amount is equal to, and not greater 
than the Enterprise Fee charged for the BATS One Summary Feed. Id. 
(adopting a monthly Enterprise Fee of $50,000 as well as a separate 
$1,000 per month Data Consolidation Fee for the BATS One Summary 
Feed).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Digital Media Enterprise Fee. The Exchange proposes to adopt a 
Digital Media Enterprise Fee of $2,500 per month for EDGX Top and EDGX 
Last Sale.\18\ As an alternative to proposed User fees discussed above, 
a recipient firm may purchase a monthly Digital Media Enterprise 
license to receive EDGX Top and EDGX Last Sale from an External 
Distributor to distribute to an unlimited number of Professional and 
Non-Professional Users for viewing via television, Web sites, and 
mobile devices for informational and non-trading purposes only without 
having to account for the extent of access to the data or the report 
the number of Users to the Exchange. Lastly, the proposed Digital Media 
Enterprise Fee would be counted towards the Distributor Fee credit 
described above, under which an External Distributor receives a credit 
towards its Distributor Fee equal to the amount of its monthly EDGX Top 
and/or EDGX Last Sale usage fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ The Exchange notes that EDGA, BYX and BZX also filed 
proposed rule changes with Commission to adopt a Digital Media 
Enterprise Fee for their respective Top and Last Sale market data 
product. See File Nos. SR-EDGA-2015-25, SR-BYX-2015-30, and SR-BATS-
2015-48 (proposing a monthly Digital Media Enterprise Fee of $2,500 
for their respective Top and Last Sale feeds). A vendor that wishes 
to create a product like the BATS One Summary Feed could subscribe 
to each of the BATS Exchanges' Top and Last Sale feeds. See the 
Initial BATS One Feed Fee Filings, supra note 10. Should a vendor 
subscribe to each of the BATS Exchanges' Top and Last Sale feeds, it 
would be charged a total monthly Digital Media Enterprise Fee of 
$10,000. This amount is less than the Digital Media Enterprise Fee 
charged for the BATS One Summary Feed. See Securities Exchange Act 
Release Nos. 74598 (March 27, 2015), 80 FR 17791 (April 2, 2015) 
(SR-BATS-2015-24); 74599 (March 27, 2015), 80 FR 17812 (April 2, 
2015) (SR-BYX-2015-19); 74600 (March 27, 2014), 80 FR 17797 (April 
2, 2015) (SR-EDGA-2015-14); and 74601 (March 27, 2015), 80 FR 17804 
(April 2, 2015) (SR-EDGX-2015-14) (adopting a monthly Digital Media 
Enterprise Fee of $15,000 for the BATS One Summary Feed).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Non-Substantive, Corrective Changes
    The Exchange proposes to make a non-substantive change to the 
description of the BATS One Feed Enterprise Fee as well as correct a 
cross-reference within the definition of ``Non-Professional User''.
    First, the proposed change to the description of the BATS One Feed 
\19\ Enterprise Fee is intended to align with the descriptions of the 
Enterprise Fees for EDGX Top and EDGX Last Sale proposed above. The fee 
schedule currently states that:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ In sum, the BATS One Feed is a data feed that disseminates, 
on a real-time basis, the aggregate best bid and offer (``BBO'') of 
all displayed orders for securities traded on EDGX and its 
affiliated exchanges and for which the BATS Exchanges report quotes 
under the Consolidated Tape Association (``CTA'') Plan or the 
Nasdaq/UTP Plan. The BATS One Feed also contains the individual last 
sale information for the BATS Exchanges (collectively with the 
aggregate BBO, the ``BATS One Summary Feed''). In addition, the BATS 
One Feed contains optional functionality which enables recipients to 
receive aggregated two-sided quotations from the BATS Exchanges for 
up to five (5) price levels (``BATS One Premium Feed''). See 
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73918 (December 23, 2014), 79 FR 
78920 (December 31, 2014) (File Nos. SR-EDGX-2014-25; SR-EDGA-2014-
25; SR-BATS-2014-055; SR-BYX-2014-030) (Notice of Amendments No. 2 
and Order Granting Accelerated Approval to Proposed Rule Changes, as 
Modified by Amendments Nos. 1 and 2, to Establish a New Market Data 
Product called the BATS One Feed) (``BATS One Approval Order'').

[a]s an alternative to User fees, a recipient firm may purchase a 
monthly Enterprise license to receive the BATS One Feed from an 
External Distributor to an unlimited number of Professional and Non-
Professional Users. A recipient firm must pay a separate Enterprise 
Fee for each External Distributor that controls the display of the 
BATS One Feed if it wishes such User to be covered by the Enterprise 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee. The Enterprise Fee is in addition to the Distributor Fee.

The Exchange proposes to delete the last sentence of the above 
description stating that the Enterprise Fee is in addition to the 
Distributor Fee. The original purpose of this sentence was to clarify 
that the Distributor Fee and Enterprise Fee were separate fees. 
However, the Exchange understands that this sentence has led to 
confusion for the following reason. As is the case for the proposed 
Enterprise Fees for EDGX Top and EDGX Last Sale described above, the 
BATS One Feed Enterprise Fee is counted towards the Distributor Fee 
credit, under which an External Distributor receives a credit towards 
its Distributor Fee equal to the amount of its monthly BATS One Feed 
Usage Fees. Stating that the Enterprise and Distributor fees were 
separate fees has caused confusion regarding the application of the 
Distributor Fee Usage Fee credit. Therefore, the Exchange proposes to 
delete the last sentence stating that the Enterprise Fee is in addition 
to the Distributor Fee. Deleting this sentence does not alter the 
manner in which the Enterprise Fee is charged. Rather, it is intended 
to avoid confusion and align the description with that of the proposed 
Enterprise Fees for EDGX Top and EDGX Last Sale described above.
    Second, the Exchange proposes to correct a cross-reference within 
the

[[Page 41107]]

definition of ``Non-Professional User''. In part, a ``Non-Professional 
User'' is currently defined as ``a natural person who is not: . . . 
engaged as an ``investment adviser'' as that term is defined in Section 
201(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (whether or not 
registered or qualified under that Act) . . .'' The definition 
incorrectly states that the term ``investment adviser is defined under 
Section 201(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, when it is, in 
fact, defined under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act 
of 1940. Therefore, the Exchange proposes to replace the reference to 
Section 201(11) with Section 202(a)(11) within the definition of Non-
Professional User.
Implementation Date
    The Exchange proposes to implement the proposed changes to its fee 
schedule on July 1, 2015.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\20\ in general, and 
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\21\ in particular, as it is 
designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, 
fees and other charges among its members and other recipients of 
Exchange data. The Exchange believes that the proposed rates are 
equitable and non-discriminatory in that they apply uniformly to all 
recipients of Exchange data. The Exchange believes the proposed fees 
are competitive with those charged by other venues and, therefore, 
reasonable and equitably allocated to recipients. Lastly, the Exchange 
also believes that the proposed fees are reasonable and non-
discriminatory because they will apply uniformly to all recipients of 
Exchange data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change is 
consistent with Section 11(A) of the Act \22\ in that it supports (i) 
fair competition among brokers and dealers, among exchange markets, and 
between exchange markets and markets other than exchange markets and 
(ii) the availability to brokers, dealers, and investors of information 
with respect to quotations for and transactions in securities. 
Furthermore, the proposed rule change is consistent with Rule 603 of 
Regulation NMS,\23\ which provides that any national securities 
exchange that distributes information with respect to quotations for or 
transactions in an NMS stock do so on terms that are not unreasonably 
discriminatory. In adopting Regulation NMS, the Commission granted 
self-regulatory organizations and broker-dealers increased authority 
and flexibility to offer new and unique market data to the public. It 
was believed that this authority would expand the amount of data 
available to consumers, and also spur innovation and competition for 
the provision of market data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1.
    \23\ See 17 CFR 242.603.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the proposed fees would not permit unfair 
discrimination because all of the Exchange's customers and market data 
vendors will be subject to the proposed fees on an equivalent basis. 
EDGX Last Sale and EDGX Top are distributed and purchased on a 
voluntary basis, in that neither the Exchange nor market data 
distributors are required by any rule or regulation to make this data 
available. Accordingly, Distributors and Users can discontinue use at 
any time and for any reason, including due to an assessment of the 
reasonableness of fees charged. Firms have a wide variety of 
alternative market data products from which to choose, such as similar 
proprietary data products offered by other exchanges and consolidated 
data. Moreover, the Exchange is not required to make any proprietary 
data products available or to offer any specific pricing alternatives 
to any customers.
    In addition, the fees that are the subject of this rule filing are 
constrained by competition. As explained below in the Exchange's 
Statement on Burden on Competition, the existence of alternatives to 
EDGX Top and EDGX Last Sale further ensures that the Exchange cannot 
set unreasonable fees, or fees that are unreasonably discriminatory, 
when vendors and subscribers can elect such alternatives. That is, the 
Exchange competes with other exchanges (and their affiliates) that 
provide similar market data products. If another exchange (or its 
affiliate) were to charge less to consolidate and distribute its 
similar product than the Exchange charges to consolidate and distribute 
EDGX Top or EDGX Last Sale, prospective Users likely would not 
subscribe to, or would cease subscribing to, the EDGX Top or EDGX Last 
Sale.
    The Exchange notes that the Commission is not required to undertake 
a cost-of-service or rate-making approach. The Exchange believes that, 
even if it were possible as a matter of economic theory, cost-based 
pricing for non-core market data would be so complicated that it could 
not be done practically.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ The Exchange believes that cost-based pricing would be 
impractical because it would create enormous administrative burdens 
for all parties, including the Commission, to cost-regulate a large 
number of participants and standardize and analyze extraordinary 
amounts of information, accounts, and reports. In addition, it is 
impossible to regulate market data prices in isolation from prices 
charged by markets for other services that are joint products. Cost-
based rate regulation would also lead to litigation and may distort 
incentives, including those to minimize costs and to innovate, 
leading to further waste. Under cost-based pricing, the Commission 
would be burdened with determining a fair rate of return, and the 
industry could experience frequent rate increases based on 
escalating expense levels. Even in industries historically subject 
to utility regulation, cost-based ratemaking has been discredited. 
As such, the Exchange believes that cost-based ratemaking would be 
inappropriate for proprietary market data and inconsistent with 
Congress's direction that the Commission use its authority to foster 
the development of the national market system, and that market 
forces will continue to provide appropriate pricing discipline. See 
Appendix C to NYSE's comments to the Commission's 2000 Concept 
Release on the Regulation of Market Information Fees and Revenues, 
which can be found on the Commission's Web site at http://www.sec.gov/rules/concept/s72899/buck1.htm. See also Securities 
Exchange Act Release No. 73816 (December 11, 2014), 79 FR 75200 
(December 17, 2014) (SR-NYSE-2014-64) (Notice of Filing and 
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Establish an 
Access Fee for the NYSE Best Quote and Trades Data Feed, Operative 
December 1, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    User Fees. The Exchange believes that implementing the Professional 
and Non-Professional User fees for EDGX Top and EDGX Last Sale is 
equitable and reasonable because it will result in greater availability 
to Professional and Non-Professional Users. Moreover, introducing a 
modest Non-Professional User fee for EDGX Top and EDGX Last Sale is 
reasonable because it provides an additional method for retail 
investors to access EDGX Top and EDGX Last Sale data by providing the 
same data that is available to Professional Users. The Exchange 
believes that the proposed fees are equitable and not unfairly 
discriminatory because they will be charged uniformly to recipient 
firms and Users. The fee structure of differentiated Professional and 
Non-Professional fees is utilized by the Exchange for the BATS One Feed 
and has long been used by other exchanges for their proprietary data 
products, and by the Nasdaq UTP and the CTA and CQ Plans in order to 
reduce the price of data to retail investors and make it more broadly 
available.\25\ Offering EDGX Top and EDGX Last Sale to Non-Professional 
Users with the same data available to

[[Page 41108]]

Professional Users results in greater equity among data recipients.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See the Initial BATS One Feed Fee Filings, supra note 10. 
See also, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 20002, File No. 
S7-433 (July 22, 1983) (establishing nonprofessional fees for CTA 
data); Nasdaq Rules 7023(b), 7047.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the proposed fees are reasonable when compared to 
similar fees for comparable products offered by the NYSE. Specifically, 
NYSE offers NYSE BBO, which includes best bid and offer for NYSE traded 
securities, for a monthly fee of $4.00 per professional subscriber and 
$0.20 per non-professional subscriber.\26\ NYSE also offers NYSE 
Trades, which is a data feed that provides the last sale information 
for NYSE traded securities, for the same price as NYSE BBO. The 
Exchange's proposed per User Fees for EDGX Top and EDGX Last Sale are 
less than the NYSE's fees for NYSE Trades and NYSE BBO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ See NYSE Market Data Pricing dated May 2015 available at 
http://www.nyxdata.com/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Enterprise Fee. The proposed Enterprise Fee for EDGX Top and EDGX 
Last Sale are equitable and reasonable as the fees proposed are less 
than the enterprise fees currently charged for NYSE Trades and NYSE 
BBO. The NYSE charges a separate enterprise fee of $190,000 per month 
for NYSE Trades and NYSE BBO.\27\ In addition, the Enterprise Fee 
proposed by the Exchange could result in a fee reduction for recipient 
firms with a large number of Professional and Non-Professional Users. 
If a recipient firm has a smaller number of Professional Users of EDGX 
Top or EDGX Last Sale, then it may continue using the per User 
structure and benefit from the per User Fee reductions. By reducing 
prices for recipient firms with a large number of Professional and Non-
Professional Users, the Exchange believes that more firms may choose to 
receive and to distribute the EDGX Top or EDGX Last Sale, thereby 
expanding the distribution of this market data for the benefit of 
investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange further believes that the proposed Enterprise Fee is 
reasonable because it will simplify reporting for certain recipients 
that have large numbers of Professional and Non-Professional Users. 
Firms that pay the proposed Enterprise Fee will not have to report the 
number of Users on a monthly basis as they currently do, but rather 
will only have to count natural person users every six months, which is 
a significant reduction in administrative burden. Finally, the Exchange 
believes that it is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to 
establish an Enterprise Fee because it reduces the Exchange's costs and 
the Distributor's administrative burdens in tracking and auditing large 
numbers of Users.
    Digital Media Enterprise Fee. The Exchange believes that the 
proposed Digital Media Enterprise Fee for EDGX Top and EDGX Last Sale 
provides for an equitable allocation of reasonable fees among 
recipients of the data and is not designed to permit unfair 
discrimination among customers, brokers, or dealers. In establishing 
the Digital Media Enterprise Fee, the Exchange recognizes that there is 
demand for a more seamless and easier-to-administer data distribution 
model that takes into account the expanded variety of media and 
communication devices that investors utilize today. The Exchange 
believes the Digital Media Enterprise Fee will be easy to administer 
because data recipients that purchase it would not be required to 
differentiate between Professional and Non-Professional Users, account 
for the extent of access to the data, or report the number of Users. 
This is a significant reduction on a recipient firm's administrative 
burdens and is a significant value to investors. For example, a 
television broadcaster could display EDGX Top and/or EDGX Last Sale 
data during market-related programming and on its Web site or allow 
viewers to view the data via their mobile devices, creating a more 
seamless distribution model that will allow investors more choice in 
how they receive and view market data, all without having to account 
for and/or measure who accesses the data and how often they do so.
    The proposed Digital Media Enterprise Fee is equitable and 
reasonable because it will also enable recipient firms to more widely 
distribute data from EDGX Top and EDGX Last Sale to investors for 
informational purposes at a lower cost than is available today. For 
example, a recipient firm may purchase an Enterprise license in the 
amount of $15,000 per month for to receive EDGX Top and/or EDGX Last 
Sale from an External Distributor for an unlimited number of 
Professional and Non-Professional Users, which is greater than the 
proposed Digital Media Enterprise Fee. The Exchange also believes the 
amount of the Digital Media Enterprise Fee is reasonable as compared to 
the existing enterprise fees discussed above because the distribution 
of EDGX Top and EDGX Last Sale data is limited to television, Web 
sites, and mobile devices for informational purposes only, while 
distribution of EDGX Top and EDGX Last Sale data pursuant to an 
Enterprise license contains no such limitation. The Exchange also 
believes that the proposed Digital Media Enterprise Fee is equitable 
and reasonable because it is less than similar fees charged by other 
exchanges.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ The Nasdaq Stock Market offers proprietary data products 
for distribution over the internet and television under alternative 
fee schedules that are subject to maximum fee of $50,000 per month. 
See Nasdaq Rule 7039(b). The NYSE charges a Digit Media Enterprise 
fee of $40,000 per month for the NYSE Trade Digital Media product. 
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69272 (April 2, 2013), 78 FR 
20983 (April 8, 2013) (SR-NYSE-2013-23).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Non-Substantive, Corrective Changes. The Exchange believes that the 
proposed non-substantive, corrective changes are consistent with 
Section 6(b) of the Act,\29\ in general, and Section 6(b)(4) of the 
Act,\30\ in particular, in that they provide for an equitable 
allocation of reasonable fees among recipients of the data and is not 
designed to permit unfair discrimination among customers, brokers, or 
dealers. These proposed changes are equitable and reasonable because 
the changes are designed to clarify the fee schedule and avoid 
potential investor confusion. The amendment to the BATS One Enterprise 
Fee is also intended to align the description with that of the proposed 
Enterprise Fees for EDGX Top and EDGX Last Sale described above. The 
proposed changes are also non-discriminatory as they would apply to all 
recipient firms uniformly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \30\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
EDGX Top and EDGX Last Sale
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. The 
Exchange's ability to price EDGX Last Sale and EDGX Top are constrained 
by: (i) Competition among exchanges, other trading platforms, and Trade 
Reporting Facilities (``TRF'') that compete with each other in a 
variety of dimensions; (ii) the existence of inexpensive real-time 
consolidated data and market-specific data and free delayed data; and 
(iii) the inherent contestability of the market for proprietary data.
    The Exchange and its market data products are subject to 
significant competitive forces and the proposed fees represent 
responses to that competition. To start, the Exchange competes 
intensely for order flow. It

[[Page 41109]]

competes with the other national securities exchanges that currently 
trade equities, with electronic communication networks, with quotes 
posted in FINRA's Alternative Display Facility, with alternative 
trading systems, and with securities firms that primarily trade as 
principal with their customer order flow.
    In addition, EDGX Last Sale and EDGX Top compete with a number of 
alternative products. For instance, EDGX Last Sale and EDGX Top do not 
provide a complete picture of all trading activity in a security. 
Rather, the other national securities exchanges, the several TRFs of 
FINRA, and Electronic Communication Networks (``ECN'') that produce 
proprietary data all produce trades and trade reports. Each is 
currently permitted to produce last sale information products, and many 
currently do, including Nasdaq and NYSE. In addition, market 
participants can gain access to EDGX last sale prices and top-of-book 
quotations, though integrated with the prices of other markets, on 
feeds made available through the SIPs.
    In sum, the availability of a variety of alternative sources of 
information imposes significant competitive pressures on Exchange data 
products and the Exchange's compelling need to attract order flow 
imposes significant competitive pressure on the Exchange to act 
equitably, fairly, and reasonably in setting the proposed data product 
fees. The proposed data product fees are, in part, responses to that 
pressure. The Exchange believes that the proposed fees would reflect an 
equitable allocation of its overall costs to users of its facilities.
    In addition, when establishing the proposed fees, the Exchange 
considered the competitiveness of the market for proprietary data and 
all of the implications of that competition. The Exchange believes that 
it has considered all relevant factors and has not considered 
irrelevant factors in order to establish fair, reasonable, and not 
unreasonably discriminatory fees and an equitable allocation of fees 
among all Users. The existence of alternatives to EDGX Last Sale and 
EDGX Top, including existing similar feeds by other exchanges, 
consolidated data, and proprietary data from other sources, ensures 
that the Exchange cannot set unreasonable fees, or fees that are 
unreasonably discriminatory, when vendors and subscribers can elect 
these alternatives or choose not to purchase a specific proprietary 
data product if its cost to purchase is not justified by the returns 
any particular vendor or subscriber would achieve through the purchase.
Non-Substantive, Corrective Changes
    The proposed non-substantive, corrective changes to the fee 
schedule will not have any impact on completion. The proposed changes 
are designed to clarify the fee schedule and avoid potential investor 
confusion.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on 
the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \31\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 
thereunder.\32\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the 
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend 
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is 
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of 
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \32\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-EDGX-2015-28 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2015-28. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2015-28, and should be 
submitted on or before August 4, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-17175 Filed 7-13-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 134 / Tuesday, July 14, 2015 / Notices 41109

competes with the other national subscriber would achieve through the rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
securities exchanges that currently trade purchase. submission, all subsequent
equities, with electronic communication amendments, all written statements
Non-Substantive, Corrective Changes
networks, with quotes posted in with respect to the proposed rule
FINRA’s Alternative Display Facility, The proposed non-substantive, change that are filed with the
with alternative trading systems, and corrective changes to the fee schedule Commission, and all written
with securities firms that primarily will not have any impact on completion. communications relating to the
trade as principal with their customer The proposed changes are designed to proposed rule change between the
order flow. clarify the fee schedule and avoid Commission and any person, other than
In addition, EDGX Last Sale and potential investor confusion. those that may be withheld from the
EDGX Top compete with a number of public in accordance with the
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
alternative products. For instance, provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
Statement on Comments on the
EDGX Last Sale and EDGX Top do not available for Web site viewing and
Proposed Rule Change Received From
provide a complete picture of all trading printing in the Commission’s Public
Members, Participants, or Others
activity in a security. Rather, the other Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
national securities exchanges, the The Exchange has neither solicited Washington, DC 20549 on official
several TRFs of FINRA, and Electronic nor received written comments on the business days between the hours of
Communication Networks (‘‘ECN’’) that proposed rule change. 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
produce proprietary data all produce III. Date of Effectiveness of the filing also will be available for
trades and trade reports. Each is Proposed Rule Change and Timing for inspection and copying at the principal
currently permitted to produce last sale Commission Action office of the Exchange. All comments
information products, and many received will be posted without change;
The foregoing rule change has become the Commission does not edit personal
currently do, including Nasdaq and
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) identifying information from
NYSE. In addition, market participants
of the Act 31 and paragraph (f) of Rule submissions. You should submit only
can gain access to EDGX last sale prices
19b–4 thereunder.32 At any time within information that you wish to make
and top-of-book quotations, though
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule available publicly. All submissions
integrated with the prices of other
change, the Commission summarily may should refer to File Number SR–EDGX–
markets, on feeds made available
temporarily suspend such rule change if 2015–28, and should be submitted on or
through the SIPs.
it appears to the Commission that such before August 4, 2015.
In sum, the availability of a variety of
action is necessary or appropriate in the For the Commission, by the Division of
alternative sources of information
public interest, for the protection of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
imposes significant competitive
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of authority.33
pressures on Exchange data products
the purposes of the Act. Brent J. Fields,
and the Exchange’s compelling need to
attract order flow imposes significant IV. Solicitation of Comments Secretary.
competitive pressure on the Exchange to Interested persons are invited to
[FR Doc. 2015–17175 Filed 7–13–15; 8:45 am]
act equitably, fairly, and reasonably in submit written data, views, and BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
setting the proposed data product fees. arguments concerning the foregoing,
The proposed data product fees are, in including whether the proposed rule
part, responses to that pressure. The SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
change is consistent with the Act. COMMISSION
Exchange believes that the proposed Comments may be submitted by any of
fees would reflect an equitable the following methods: [Release No. 34–75390; File No. SR–EDGA–
allocation of its overall costs to users of 2015–26]
its facilities. Electronic Comments
In addition, when establishing the • Use the Commission’s Internet Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGA
proposed fees, the Exchange considered comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
the competitiveness of the market for rules/sro.shtml); or Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
proprietary data and all of the • Send an email to rule-comments@ Rule Change Related to Fees for Use
implications of that competition. The sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– of EDGA Exchange, Inc.
Exchange believes that it has considered EDGX–2015–28 on the subject line. July 8, 2015.
all relevant factors and has not Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
considered irrelevant factors in order to Paper Comments
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
establish fair, reasonable, and not • Send paper comments in triplicate ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
unreasonably discriminatory fees and an to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities notice is hereby given that on June 26,
equitable allocation of fees among all and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street 2015, EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the
Users. The existence of alternatives to NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGA’’) filed with the
EDGX Last Sale and EDGX Top, All submissions should refer to File Securities and Exchange Commission
including existing similar feeds by other Number SR–EDGX–2015–28. This file (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
exchanges, consolidated data, and number should be included on the change as described in Items I, II and III
proprietary data from other sources,
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

subject line if email is used. To help the below, which Items have been prepared
ensures that the Exchange cannot set Commission process and review your by the Exchange. The Exchange has
unreasonable fees, or fees that are comments more efficiently, please use designated the proposed rule change as
unreasonably discriminatory, when only one method. The Commission will one establishing or changing a member
vendors and subscribers can elect these post all comments on the Commission’s due, fee, or other charge imposed by the
alternatives or choose not to purchase a Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
specific proprietary data product if its 33 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
cost to purchase is not justified by the 31 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
returns any particular vendor or 32 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:09 Jul 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00119 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM 14JYN1
Document Created: 2018-02-23 09:19:47
Document Modified: 2018-02-23 09:19:47
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
FR Citation		80 FR 41104