80_FR_42174 80 FR 42038 - Safety Zone; Town of Olcott Fireworks Display; Lake Ontario, Olcott, NY

80 FR 42038 - Safety Zone; Town of Olcott Fireworks Display; Lake Ontario, Olcott, NY

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 136 (July 16, 2015)

Page Range42038-42040
FR Document2015-17483

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on Lake Ontario, Olcott, NY. This safety zone is intended to restrict vessels from a portion of Lake Ontario during the Town of Olcott fireworks display. This temporary safety zone is necessary to protect mariners and vessels from the navigational hazards associated with a fireworks display.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 136 (Thursday, July 16, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 136 (Thursday, July 16, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42038-42040]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17483]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2015-0595]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Town of Olcott Fireworks Display; Lake Ontario, 
Olcott, NY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on 
Lake Ontario, Olcott, NY. This safety zone is intended to restrict 
vessels from a portion of Lake Ontario during the Town of Olcott 
fireworks display. This temporary safety zone is necessary to protect 
mariners and vessels from the navigational hazards associated with a 
fireworks display.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from July 16, 2015 
until September 6, 2015. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice 
will be used from June 25, 2015 until July 16, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket 
[USCG-2015-0595]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the 
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also 
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground 
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email LTJG Amanda Garcia, Chief of Waterways Management, U.S. 
Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716-843-9343, email 
[email protected]. If you have questions on viewing 
the docket, call Ms. Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket 
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826 or 1-800-647-5527.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule

A. Regulatory History and Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior 
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable and 
contrary to the public interest. The final details for this event were 
not known to the Coast Guard until there was insufficient time 
remaining before the event to publish an NPRM. Thus, delaying the 
effective date of this rule to wait for a comment period to run would 
be impracticable and contrary to the public interest because it would 
inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to protect spectators and vessels 
from the hazards associated with a maritime fireworks display. 
Therefore, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for making this temporary rule effective less than 30 days 
after publication in the Federal Register. For the same reasons 
discussed in the preceding paragraph, waiting for a 30 day notice 
period to run would be impracticable.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis and authorities for this rule are found in 33 
U.S.C. 1231, 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 
CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; 
and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which 
collectively authorize the Coast Guard to establish and define 
regulatory safety zones.
    Between 9:30 p.m. and 11 p.m. on July 10, 2015; July 23, 2015; 
August 13, 2015; August 27, 2015; and September 6, 2015, a fireworks 
display will be held on the shoreline of Lake Ontario in Olcott, NY. It 
is anticipated that numerous vessels will be in the immediate vicinity 
of the launch point. The Captain of the Port Buffalo has determined 
that such a launch proximate to a gathering of watercraft pose a 
significant risk to public safety and property. Such hazards include 
premature and accidental detonations, dangerous projectiles, and 
falling or burning debris.

C. Discussion of the Final Rule

    With the aforementioned hazards in mind, the Captain of the Port 
Buffalo has determined that this temporary safety zone is necessary to 
ensure the safety of spectators and vessels during the Town of Olcott 
fireworks display. This zone will be enforced from 9:30 p.m. until 11 
p.m. on July 10, 2015; July 23, 2015; August 13, 2015; August 27, 2015; 
and September 6, 2015. This zone will encompass all waters of Lake 
Ontario; Olcott, NY within a 1,050-foot radius of position 
43[deg]20'23.6'' N. and 078[deg]43'09.5'' W. (NAD 83).
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is 
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his 
designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or his 
designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on these statutes and executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as 
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and 
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential 
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or 
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and 
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.

[[Page 42039]]

    We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action 
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy, 
will not interfere with other agencies, will not adversely alter the 
budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel 
legal or policy issues. The safety zone created by this rule will be 
relatively small and enforced for a relatively short time. Also, the 
safety zone is designed to minimize its impact on navigable waters. 
Furthermore, the safety zone has been designed to allow vessels to 
transit around it. Thus, restrictions on vessel movement within that 
particular area are expected to be minimal. Under certain conditions, 
moreover, vessels may still transit through the safety zone when 
permitted by the Captain of the Port.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered the impact of this rule on small entities. The Coast Guard 
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which 
might be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending 
to transit or anchor in a portion of Lake Ontario on the evening of 
July 10, 2015; July 23, 2015; August 13, 2015; August 27, 2015; and 
September 6, 2015.
    This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This 
safety zone would be effective, and thus subject to enforcement, for 
only 90 minutes late in the day. Traffic may be allowed to pass through 
the zone with the permission of the Captain of the Port. The Captain of 
the Port can be reached via VHF channel 16. Before the enforcement of 
the zone, we would issue local Broadcast Notice to Mariners.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined 
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive 
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect 
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined 
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not 
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human 
environment. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone and, 
therefore it is categorically excluded from further review under 
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An 
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a 
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where 
indicated under

[[Page 42040]]

ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the 
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0595 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T09-0595  Safety Zone; Town of Olcott Fireworks Display; Lake 
Ontario, Olcott, NY.

    (a) Location. This zone will encompass all waters of Lake Ontario; 
Olcott, NY within a 1,050-foot radius of position 43[deg]20'23.6'' N. 
and 078[deg]43'09.5'' W. (NAD 83).
    (b) Enforcement period. This regulation will be enforced on July 
10, 2015; July 23, 2015; August 13, 2015; August 27, 2015; and 
September 6, 2015 from 9:30 p.m. until 11 p.m.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety 
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo 
or his designated on-scene representative.
    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may 
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-
scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port 
Buffalo is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who 
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act on his 
behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety 
zone must contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene 
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port 
Buffalo or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 
16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety 
zone must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of 
the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene representative.

    Dated: June 25, 2015.
B.W. Roche,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2015-17483 Filed 7-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P



                                            42038              Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 136 / Thursday, July 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

                                            via U.S. Coast Guard Sector Lake                         Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,                 Stat. 2064; and Department of
                                            Michigan on VHF channel 16.                              Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.                  Homeland Security Delegation No.
                                              This document is issued under                          and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,                    0170.1, which collectively authorize the
                                            authority of 33 CFR 165.930 and 5                        except Federal holidays.                              Coast Guard to establish and define
                                            U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this                       FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If                   regulatory safety zones.
                                            publication in the Federal Register, the                 you have questions on this rule, call or                 Between 9:30 p.m. and 11 p.m. on
                                            Captain of the Port Lake Michigan will                   email LTJG Amanda Garcia, Chief of                    July 10, 2015; July 23, 2015; August 13,
                                            also provide notice through other                        Waterways Management, U.S. Coast                      2015; August 27, 2015; and September
                                            means, which may include Broadcast                       Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716–                  6, 2015, a fireworks display will be held
                                            Notice to Mariners, Local Notice to                      843–9343, email                                       on the shoreline of Lake Ontario in
                                            Mariners, local news media, distribution                 SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil. If                Olcott, NY. It is anticipated that
                                            in leaflet form, and on-scene oral notice.               you have questions on viewing the                     numerous vessels will be in the
                                            Additionally, the Captain of the Port                    docket, call Ms. Cheryl Collins, Program              immediate vicinity of the launch point.
                                            Lake Michigan may notify                                 Manager, Docket Operations, telephone                 The Captain of the Port Buffalo has
                                            representatives from the maritime                        202–366–9826 or 1–800–647–5527.                       determined that such a launch
                                            industry through telephonic and email                    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                            proximate to a gathering of watercraft
                                            notifications.                                                                                                 pose a significant risk to public safety
                                                                                                     Table of Acronyms
                                              Dated: June 30, 2015.                                                                                        and property. Such hazards include
                                            A.B. Cocanour,                                           DHS Department of Homeland Security                   premature and accidental detonations,
                                                                                                     FR Federal Register                                   dangerous projectiles, and falling or
                                            Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the                NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
                                            Port, Lake Michigan.                                                                                           burning debris.
                                                                                                     TFR Temporary Final Rule
                                            [FR Doc. 2015–17459 Filed 7–15–15; 8:45 am]                                                                    C. Discussion of the Final Rule
                                            BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
                                                                                                     A. Regulatory History and Information
                                                                                                        The Coast Guard is issuing this                      With the aforementioned hazards in
                                                                                                     temporary final rule without prior                    mind, the Captain of the Port Buffalo
                                            DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND                                   notice and opportunity to comment                     has determined that this temporary
                                            SECURITY                                                 pursuant to authority under section 4(a)              safety zone is necessary to ensure the
                                                                                                     of the Administrative Procedure Act                   safety of spectators and vessels during
                                            Coast Guard                                              (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision               the Town of Olcott fireworks display.
                                                                                                     authorizes an agency to issue a rule                  This zone will be enforced from 9:30
                                            33 CFR Part 165                                          without prior notice and opportunity to               p.m. until 11 p.m. on July 10, 2015; July
                                            [Docket Number USCG–2015–0595]                           comment when the agency for good                      23, 2015; August 13, 2015; August 27,
                                                                                                     cause finds that those procedures are                 2015; and September 6, 2015. This zone
                                            RIN 1625–AA00                                                                                                  will encompass all waters of Lake
                                                                                                     ‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
                                                                                                     to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.              Ontario; Olcott, NY within a 1,050-foot
                                            Safety Zone; Town of Olcott Fireworks                                                                          radius of position 43°20′23.6″ N. and
                                            Display; Lake Ontario, Olcott, NY                        553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
                                                                                                     good cause exists for not publishing a                078°43′09.5″ W. (NAD 83).
                                            AGENCY:    Coast Guard, DHS.                             notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)                    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
                                            ACTION:   Temporary final rule.                          with respect to this rule because doing               within the safety zone is prohibited
                                                                                                     so would be impracticable and contrary                unless authorized by the Captain of the
                                            SUMMARY:   The Coast Guard is                            to the public interest. The final details             Port Buffalo or his designated on-scene
                                            establishing a temporary safety zone on                  for this event were not known to the                  representative. The Captain of the Port
                                            Lake Ontario, Olcott, NY. This safety                    Coast Guard until there was insufficient              or his designated on-scene
                                            zone is intended to restrict vessels from                time remaining before the event to                    representative may be contacted via
                                            a portion of Lake Ontario during the                     publish an NPRM. Thus, delaying the                   VHF Channel 16.
                                            Town of Olcott fireworks display. This                   effective date of this rule to wait for a
                                            temporary safety zone is necessary to                                                                          D. Regulatory Analyses
                                                                                                     comment period to run would be
                                            protect mariners and vessels from the                    impracticable and contrary to the public                We developed this rule after
                                            navigational hazards associated with a                   interest because it would inhibit the                 considering numerous statutes and
                                            fireworks display.                                       Coast Guard’s ability to protect                      executive orders related to rulemaking.
                                            DATES: This rule is effective without                    spectators and vessels from the hazards               Below we summarize our analyses
                                            actual notice from July 16, 2015 until                   associated with a maritime fireworks                  based on these statutes and executive
                                            September 6, 2015. For the purposes of                   display. Therefore, under 5 U.S.C.                    orders.
                                            enforcement, actual notice will be used                  553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that
                                            from June 25, 2015 until July 16, 2015.                                                                        1. Regulatory Planning and Review
                                                                                                     good cause exists for making this
                                            ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in                        temporary rule effective less than 30                   This rule is not a significant
                                            this preamble are part of docket [USCG–                  days after publication in the Federal                 regulatory action under section 3(f) of
                                            2015–0595]. To view documents                            Register. For the same reasons                        Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
                                            mentioned in this preamble as being                      discussed in the preceding paragraph,                 Planning and Review, as supplemented
                                            available in the docket, go to http://                   waiting for a 30 day notice period to run             by Executive Order 13563, Improving
                                            www.regulations.gov, type the docket                     would be impracticable.                               Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
                                            number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click                                                                         does not require an assessment of
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                            ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket                         B. Basis and Purpose                                  potential costs and benefits under
                                            Folder on the line associated with this                    The legal basis and authorities for this            section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
                                            rulemaking. You may also visit the                       rule are found in 33 U.S.C. 1231, 46                  or under section 1 of Executive Order
                                            Docket Management Facility in Room                       U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50                    13563. The Office of Management and
                                            W12–140 on the ground floor of the                       U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1,               Budget has not reviewed it under those
                                            Department of Transportation West                        6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107–295, 116               Orders.


                                       VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:14 Jul 15, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00052   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM   16JYR1


                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 136 / Thursday, July 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations                                         42039

                                              We conclude that this rule is not a                      Small businesses may send comments                  Interference with Constitutionally
                                            significant regulatory action because we                 on the actions of Federal employees                   Protected Property Rights.
                                            anticipate that it will have minimal                     who enforce, or otherwise determine
                                                                                                                                                           9. Civil Justice Reform
                                            impact on the economy, will not                          compliance with, Federal regulations to
                                            interfere with other agencies, will not                  the Small Business and Agriculture                      This rule meets applicable standards
                                            adversely alter the budget of any grant                  Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman                      in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
                                            or loan recipients, and will not raise any               and the Regional Small Business                       Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
                                            novel legal or policy issues. The safety                 Regulatory Fairness Boards. The                       minimize litigation, eliminate
                                            zone created by this rule will be                        Ombudsman evaluates these actions                     ambiguity, and reduce burden.
                                            relatively small and enforced for a                      annually and rates each agency’s                      10. Protection of Children
                                            relatively short time. Also, the safety                  responsiveness to small business. If you
                                            zone is designed to minimize its impact                  wish to comment on actions by                           We have analyzed this rule under
                                            on navigable waters. Furthermore, the                    employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–                 Executive Order 13045, Protection of
                                            safety zone has been designed to allow                   888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The                    Children from Environmental Health
                                            vessels to transit around it. Thus,                      Coast Guard will not retaliate against                Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
                                            restrictions on vessel movement within                   small entities that question or complain              an economically significant rule and
                                            that particular area are expected to be                  about this rule or any policy or action               does not create an environmental risk to
                                            minimal. Under certain conditions,                       of the Coast Guard.                                   health or risk to safety that may
                                            moreover, vessels may still transit                                                                            disproportionately affect children.
                                            through the safety zone when permitted                   4. Collection of Information
                                                                                                                                                           11. Indian Tribal Governments
                                            by the Captain of the Port.                                 This rule will not call for a new
                                                                                                     collection of information under the                      This rule does not have tribal
                                            2. Impact on Small Entities                                                                                    implications under Executive Order
                                                                                                     Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
                                               Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act                  U.S.C. 3501–3520).                                    13175, Consultation and Coordination
                                            (5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered                                                                         with Indian Tribal Governments,
                                            the impact of this rule on small entities.               5. Federalism                                         because it does not have a substantial
                                            The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.                    A rule has implications for federalism             direct effect on one or more Indian
                                            605(b) that this rule will not have a                    under Executive Order 13132,                          tribes, on the relationship between the
                                            significant economic impact on a                         Federalism, if it has a substantial direct            Federal Government and Indian tribes,
                                            substantial number of small entities.                    effect on the States, on the relationship             or on the distribution of power and
                                            The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.                 between the national government and                   responsibilities between the Federal
                                            605(b) that this rule will not have a                    the States, or on the distribution of                 Government and Indian tribes.
                                            significant economic impact on a                         power and responsibilities among the
                                            substantial number of small entities.                                                                          12. Energy Effects
                                                                                                     various levels of government. We have
                                            This rule will affect the following                      analyzed this rule under that Order and                 This action is not a ‘‘significant
                                            entities, some of which might be small                   determined that this rule does not have               energy action’’ under Executive Order
                                            entities: The owners or operators of                     implications for federalism.                          13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
                                            vessels intending to transit or anchor in                                                                      That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
                                            a portion of Lake Ontario on the evening                 6. Protest Activities                                 Distribution, or Use.
                                            of July 10, 2015; July 23, 2015; August                     The Coast Guard respects the First                 13. Technical Standards
                                            13, 2015; August 27, 2015; and                           Amendment rights of protesters.
                                            September 6, 2015.                                       Protesters are asked to contact the                     This rule does not use technical
                                               This safety zone will not have a                      person listed in the FOR FURTHER                      standards. Therefore, we did not
                                            significant economic impact on a                         INFORMATION CONTACT section to                        consider the use of voluntary consensus
                                            substantial number of small entities for                 coordinate protest activities so that your            standards.
                                            the following reasons: This safety zone                  message can be received without                       14. Environment
                                            would be effective, and thus subject to                  jeopardizing the safety or security of
                                            enforcement, for only 90 minutes late in                 people, places, or vessels.                              We have analyzed this rule under
                                            the day. Traffic may be allowed to pass                                                                        Department of Homeland Security
                                            through the zone with the permission of                  7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act                       Management Directive 023–01 and
                                            the Captain of the Port. The Captain of                     The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act                   Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
                                            the Port can be reached via VHF                          of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires                 which guide the Coast Guard in
                                            channel 16. Before the enforcement of                    Federal agencies to assess the effects of             complying with the National
                                            the zone, we would issue local                           their discretionary regulatory actions. In            Environmental Policy Act of 1969
                                            Broadcast Notice to Mariners.                            particular, the Act addresses actions                 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
                                                                                                     that may result in the expenditure by a               have determined that this action is one
                                            3. Assistance for Small Entities                                                                               of a category of actions that do not
                                                                                                     State, local, or tribal government, in the
                                               Under section 213(a) of the Small                     aggregate, or by the private sector of                individually or cumulatively have a
                                            Business Regulatory Enforcement                          $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or              significant effect on the human
                                            Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–                    more in any one year. Though this rule                environment. This rule involves the
                                            121), we want to assist small entities in                will not result in such an expenditure,               establishment of a safety zone and,
                                            understanding this rule. If the rule                     we do discuss the effects of this rule                therefore it is categorically excluded
                                            would affect your small business,                        elsewhere in this preamble.                           from further review under paragraph
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                            organization, or governmental                                                                                  34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
                                            jurisdiction and you have questions                      8. Taking of Private Property                         Instruction. An environmental analysis
                                            concerning its provisions or options for                    This rule will not cause a taking of               checklist supporting this determination
                                            compliance, please contact the person                    private property or otherwise have                    and a Categorical Exclusion
                                            listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION                    taking implications under Executive                   Determination are available in the
                                            CONTACT section above.                                   Order 12630, Governmental Actions and                 docket where indicated under


                                       VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:14 Jul 15, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00053   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM   16JYR1


                                            42040              Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 136 / Thursday, July 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

                                            ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or                       of the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene                     The field of orthopedic medicine has
                                            information that may lead to the                         representative.                                       progressed to such a degree that total
                                            discovery of a significant environmental                   Dated: June 25, 2015.                               prosthetic replacement of a joint is not
                                            impact from this rule.                                   B.W. Roche,                                           always necessary. Surgical procedures,
                                                                                                                                                           sometimes referred to generally as ‘‘joint
                                            List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165                      Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
                                                                                                                                                           replacements,’’ may only require partial
                                                                                                     Port Buffalo.
                                              Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation                                                                           replacement of the disabled joint.1
                                                                                                     [FR Doc. 2015–17483 Filed 7–15–15; 8:45 am]
                                            (water), Reporting and recordkeeping                                                                           Partial replacement has the benefit of
                                                                                                     BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
                                            requirements, Security measures,                                                                               not requiring the same length of time for
                                            Waterways.                                                                                                     convalescence.2 The progression of this
                                              For the reasons discussed in the                                                                             area of medical science has raised an
                                                                                                     DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS                                issue as to whether a veteran who
                                            preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33                      AFFAIRS
                                            CFR part 165 as follows:                                                                                       undergoes a partial replacement of a
                                                                                                     38 CFR Part 4                                         joint is entitled to the 100-percent rating
                                            PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION                                                                                  evaluation during the convalescent
                                            AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS                           RIN 2900–AP38                                         period under DCs 5051 through 5056.
                                                                                                                                                              VA has long interpreted ‘‘joint
                                            ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165                 Agency Interpretation of Prosthetic                   replacement,’’ as used in § 4.71a, to
                                            continues to read as follows:                            Replacement of a Joint                                mean total joint replacement. Recently,
                                              Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;              AGENCY:    Department of Veterans Affairs.            the United States Court of Appeals for
                                            33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;                ACTION:   Final rule.                                 Veterans Claims (Veterans Court) issued
                                            Department of Homeland Security Delegation                                                                     a precedential panel decision upholding
                                            No. 0170.1.                                              SUMMARY:    The Department of Veterans                VA’s interpretation of § 4.71a. In
                                                                                                     Affairs is publishing interpretive                    Hudgens v. Gibson, 26 Vet. App. 558
                                            ■ 2. Add § 165.T09–0595 to read as                       guidance for diagnostic codes (DC) 5051               (2014), the Veterans Court upheld the
                                            follows:                                                 through 5056, which establish rating                  Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision
                                            § 165.T09–0595 Safety Zone; Town of                      criteria for prosthetic implant                       that DC 5055 applies only to total knee
                                            Olcott Fireworks Display; Lake Ontario,                  replacements of joints of the                         prosthetic replacements. The Veterans
                                            Olcott, NY.                                              musculoskeletal system. The Schedule                  Court determined that the plain
                                              (a) Location. This zone will                           for Rating Disabilities under these DCs               language of DC 5055 was unambiguous.
                                            encompass all waters of Lake Ontario;                    allows for a 1-year, 100-percent                      Id. at 561. The Veterans Court found
                                            Olcott, NY within a 1,050-foot radius of                 disability evaluation upon prosthetic                 that the medical definition of ‘‘knee
                                            position 43°20′23.6″ N. and 078°43′09.5″                 replacement of a joint. This final rule               joint’’ encompassed three distinct
                                            W. (NAD 83).                                             clarifies that VA’s longstanding                      compartments of the knee and that
                                              (b) Enforcement period. This                           interpretation of DCs 5051 through 5056               ‘‘[n]othing in the plain language of the
                                            regulation will be enforced on July 10,                  is that a 100-percent evaluation will be              regulation indicates that it applies to
                                            2015; July 23, 2015; August 13, 2015;                    in place for a period of one year when                replacements of less than a complete
                                            August 27, 2015; and September 6, 2015                   the total joint, rather than the partial              knee joint . . .’’. Id. In addition, the
                                            from 9:30 p.m. until 11 p.m.                             joint, has been replaced by a prosthetic              Veterans Court cited DC 5054, for hip
                                               (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with               implant.                                              joint prosthesis, as an example of when
                                            the general regulations in § 165.23, entry               DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is             VA intends to evaluate partial joint
                                            into, transiting, or anchoring within this               effective July 16, 2015.                              replacement. Diagnostic Code 5054, also
                                            safety zone is prohibited unless                         FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                      under § 4.71a, provides evaluation
                                            authorized by the Captain of the Port                    Stephanie Li, Chief, Regulations Staff                criteria for ‘‘[p]rosthetic replacement of
                                            Buffalo or his designated on-scene                       (211D), Compensation Service,                         the head of the femur or of the
                                            representative.                                          Department of Veterans Affairs, 810                   acetabulum’’ (italics added), which
                                               (2) This safety zone is closed to all                 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC                    together make up the hip joint. Id. The
                                            vessel traffic, except as may be                         20420, (202) 461–9700. (This is not a                 Veterans Court concluded that ‘‘DC
                                            permitted by the Captain of the Port                     toll-free telephone number.)                          5055 applies only to total knee
                                            Buffalo or his designated on-scene                       SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Diagnostic
                                                                                                                                                           replacements, as the Secretary has
                                            representative.                                          codes (DCs) 5051 through 5056, under                  demonstrated in other parts of § 4.71(a)
                                               (3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of                38 CFR 4.71a, govern the Schedule for                 [sic] that he is aware of how to include
                                            the Captain of the Port Buffalo is any                   Rating Disabilities (Rating Schedule) for             partial joint replacements as part of
                                            Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or                     prosthetic replacement of joints under                disability rating criteria in other parts of
                                            petty officer who has been designated                    the musculoskeletal system. These DCs                 § 4.71(a) [sic].’’ Id. at 562.
                                            by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act                                                                         In view of the above court decision,
                                                                                                     state that a 100-percent evaluation will
                                            on his behalf.                                                                                                 and VA’s longstanding interpretation,
                                                                                                     be sustained for 1 year following the
                                                                                                                                                           VA is amending its regulations to clarify
                                               (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter                prosthetic replacement of the named
                                                                                                                                                           that the language of § 4.71a, Prosthetic
                                            or operate within the safety zone must                   joint. This period of total disability
                                                                                                                                                           Implants, which refers to replacement of
                                            contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo                  evaluation is designed to provide
                                            or his on-scene representative to obtain                 temporary convalescence for major                        1 ‘‘Patients with osteoarthritis that is limited to
                                            permission to do so. The Captain of the                  surgery, such as total joint replacement.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                                                                                                                           just one part of the knee may be candidates for
                                            Port Buffalo or his on-scene                             Following the convalescent period, a                  unicompartmental knee replacement (also called a
                                            representative may be contacted via                      Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) or                ‘partial’ knee replacement).’’ ‘‘Unicompartmental
                                            VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given                   VA-approved examination is conducted                  Knee Replacement,’’ American Academy of
                                                                                                                                                           Orthopedic Surgeons, Ortho Info, 1 (June 2010),
                                            permission to enter or operate in the                    to determine any residual disability, and             http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/topic.cfm?topic=A00585
                                            safety zone must comply with all                         a new rating evaluation is assigned                   (last visited Mar. 19, 2014).
                                            directions given to them by the Captain                  based on such residuals.                                 2 Id.




                                       VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:14 Jul 15, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00054   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM   16JYR1



Document Created: 2015-12-15 13:13:37
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 13:13:37
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionTemporary final rule.
DatesThis rule is effective without actual notice from July 16, 2015 until September 6, 2015. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from June 25, 2015 until July 16, 2015.
ContactIf you have questions on this rule, call or email LTJG Amanda Garcia, Chief of Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716-843-9343, email [email protected] If you have questions on viewing the docket, call Ms. Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826 or 1-800-647-5527.
FR Citation80 FR 42038 
RIN Number1625-AA00
CFR AssociatedHarbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR