80_FR_42537 80 FR 42400 - Distillates, (Fischer-Tropsch), Heavy, C18

80 FR 42400 - Distillates, (Fischer-Tropsch), Heavy, C18

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 137 (July 17, 2015)

Page Range42400-42404
FR Document2015-17630

This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of distillates, (Fischer-Tropsch), heavy, C<INF>18</INF>-C<INF>50</INF>, branched, cyclic and linear when used as an inert ingredient (solvent, diluent and/or dust suppressant) in pesticide formulations applied to growing crops and raw agricultural commodities after harvest. On behalf of Pennzoil-Quaker State Company, Wagner Regulatory Associates, submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting establishment of an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level for residues of distillates, (Fischer-Tropsch), heavy, C<INF>18</INF>- C<INF>50</INF>, branched, cyclic and linear.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 137 (Friday, July 17, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 137 (Friday, July 17, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42400-42404]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17630]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0585; FRL-9929-27]


Distillates, (Fischer-Tropsch), Heavy, C18-
C50, Branched, Cyclic and Linear; Exemption From the 
Requirement of a Tolerance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement 
of a tolerance for residues of distillates, (Fischer-Tropsch), heavy, 
C18-C50, branched, cyclic and linear when used as 
an inert ingredient (solvent, diluent and/or dust suppressant) in 
pesticide formulations applied to growing crops and raw agricultural 
commodities after harvest. On behalf of Pennzoil-Quaker State Company, 
Wagner Regulatory Associates, submitted a petition to EPA under the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting establishment 
of an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation 
eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level for 
residues of distillates, (Fischer-Tropsch), heavy, C18-
C50, branched, cyclic and linear.

DATES: This regulation is effective July 17, 2015. Objections and 
requests for hearings must be received on or before September 15, 2015, 
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0585, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory 
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency 
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public 
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public 
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP 
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and 
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Lewis, Director, Registration 
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address: 
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an 
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. 
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System 
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. 
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR 
part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a 
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a 
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided 
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify 
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0585 in the subject line on the first 
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must 
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before 
September 15, 2015. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections 
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the 
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of 
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for 
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential 
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without 
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing 
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0585, by one of 
the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket 
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please

[[Page 42401]]

follow the instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along 
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Petition for Exemption

    In the Federal Register of February 27, 2013 (78 FR 13295) (FRL-
9380-2), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C. 
346a, announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP 2E8049) by 
Wagner Regulatory Associates, P.O. Box 640, 7217 Lancaster Pike, Suite 
A, Hockessin, DE 19707 on behalf of Pennzoil-Quaker State Company, 700 
Milam Street, Houston, TX 77002. The petition requested that 40 CFR 
180.910 be amended by establishing an exemption from the requirement of 
a tolerance for residues of distillates, (Fischer-Tropsch), heavy, 
C18-C50, branched, cyclic and linear (CAS Reg. 
No. 848301-69-9) when used as an inert ingredient as a solvent, diluent 
and/or dust suppressant in pesticide formulations applied to growing 
crops and raw agricultural commodities after harvest. That document 
referenced a summary of the petition prepared by Wagner Regulatory 
Associates on behalf of the Pennzoil-Quaker State Company, the 
petitioner, which is available in the docket, http://www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response to the 
notice of filing.

III. Inert Ingredient Definition

    Inert ingredients are all ingredients that are not active 
ingredients as defined in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are not 
limited to, the following types of ingredients (except when they have a 
pesticidal efficacy of their own): Solvents such as alcohols and 
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty 
acids; carriers such as clay and diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as 
carrageenan and modified cellulose; wetting, spreading, and dispersing 
agents; propellants in aerosol dispensers; microencapsulating agents; 
and emulsifiers. The term ``inert'' is not intended to imply 
nontoxicity; the ingredient may or may not be chemically active. 
Generally, EPA has exempted inert ingredients from the requirement of a 
tolerance based on the low toxicity of the individual inert 
ingredients.

IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety

    Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an 
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a 
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that 
the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines 
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm 
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, 
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for 
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through 
drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include 
occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to 
give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the 
pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure 
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to 
infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical 
residue. . . .''
    EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only 
in those cases where it can be clearly demonstrated that the risks from 
aggregate exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably 
foreseeable circumstances will pose no appreciable risks to human 
health. In order to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to 
pesticide inert ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the 
inert in conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert 
ingredient through food, drinking water, and through other exposures 
that occur as a result of pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA 
is able to determine that a finite tolerance is not necessary to ensure 
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from 
aggregate exposure to the inert ingredient, an exemption from the 
requirement of a tolerance may be established.
    Consistent with FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(A), and the factors 
specified in FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), EPA has reviewed the available 
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this 
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a 
determination on aggregate exposure for distillates, (Fischer-Tropsch), 
heavy, C18-C50, branched, cyclic and linear 
including exposure resulting from the exemption established by this 
action. EPA's assessment of exposures and risks associated with 
distillates, (Fischer-Tropsch), heavy, C18-C50, 
branched, cyclic and linear follows.

A. Toxicological Profile

    EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered their 
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of 
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered 
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities 
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and 
children. Specific information on the studies received and the nature 
of the adverse effects caused by distillates, (Fischer-Tropsch), heavy, 
C18-C50, branched, cyclic and linear (also known 
as GTL petroleum distillates) as well as the no-observed-adverse-
effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level 
(LOAEL) from the toxicity studies are discussed in this unit.
    The acute oral lethal dose (LD)50 is 5,000 milligrams/
kilograms (mg/kg) in rats. An acute dermal toxicity study was not 
conducted. There were no available dermal irritation data. It is not 
irritating to the rabbit eye. It is not a skin sensitizer in the guinea 
pig.
    In a 90-day oral toxicity study, GTL petroleum distillates 
administered by gavage resulted in a statistically significant increase 
in the incidence and severity of alveolar macrophage accumulations and 
increased vacuolation of alveolar macrophages in the lung in rats at 
the lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) 200 mg/kg/day. The No 
Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was 50 mg/kg/day.
    In a 2-generation reproductive toxicity study via gavage in rats, 
GTL petroleum distillates caused maternal and offspring toxicity at 
1,000 mg/kg/day. Toxicity was manifested as chronic interstitial/
alveolus inflammation in the lungs. The NOAEL for parental toxicity was 
50 mg/kg/day since animals in the mid dose (250 mg/kg/day) group were 
not analyzed. The reproduction NOAEL was 1,000 mg/kg/day, the highest 
dose tested.
    Based upon subsequent studies conducted to evaluate the lung 
effects, the Agency determined that the effects observed in the 90-day 
oral toxicity study and 2-generation reproductive toxicity study were 
caused by gavage administration error and were not test material (dose) 
related. In a 28-day oral feeding study in rats at doses up to 1,256 
mg/kg/day, no adverse effects were observed. In a prenatal 
developmental toxicity study in the rat (by oral gavage) at doses up to 
1,000 mg/kg/day, no adverse toxicological effects were seen. The 
results of these two more recent studies alleviated the Agency's 
concern for the lung effects seen in the 90-day oral toxicity study and 
the 2-generation reproduction study.
    GTL petroleum distillates were evaluated for mutagenic potential 
using

[[Page 42402]]

the Ames test, micronucleus assay, and gene mutation in mammalian 
cells. These studies were negative for the induction of mutations and 
aberrations. Therefore, GTL petroleum distillates are considered non-
mutagenic.
    A neurotoxicity study was not conducted with GTL petroleum 
distillates. However, signs of neurotoxicity were not observed in acute 
toxicity tests at doses up to 5,000 mg/kg body weight (bw)/day. 
Evidence of neurotoxicity was not observed in the 90-day oral toxicity 
study in rats and in the 28-day oral feeding study in rats.
    An immunotoxicity study was not conducted with GTL petroleum 
distillates. However, alveolar macrophage accumulations and increased 
vacuolation of alveolar macrophages in the lung was observed in rats at 
>200 mg/kg/day in both the 90-day oral and 2-generation reproduction 
toxicity studies. However, these effects were determined to be caused 
by gavage technique error rather than effects attributable to the test 
substance.
    There are no data specific to the absorption, metabolism, 
distribution and elimination of GTL petroleum distillates, however, the 
absorption of other mixtures of normal, branched and cyclic petroleum 
derived hydrocarbons is inversely related to carbon chain length and is 
independent of isomeric form, preparation process or type of product. 
Consequently, when administered orally, Fischer-Tropsch derived 
hydrocarbons in the range of C18-C50 are likely 
to be unabsorbed and excreted in the feces.
    Carcinogenicity studies with GTL petroleum distillates are not 
available for review. However, based on the lack of carcinogenicity of 
related linear, branched, and cyclic alkanes and the negligible 
absorption of GTL petroleum distillates, lack of systemic toxicity at 
the limit dose, lack of mutagenic concerns, GTL petroleum distillates 
are not expected to be carcinogenic.

B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern

    There were no adverse effects in repeat dose toxicity, 
reproductive, and developmental studies with GTL petroleum distillates 
at or above limit dose levels to either parental animals or their 
offspring. Thus, due to the low potential hazard and lack of hazard 
endpoint, the Agency has determined that a quantitative risk assessment 
using safety factors applied to a point of departure protective of an 
identified hazard endpoint is not appropriate for GTL petroleum 
distillates.

C. Exposure Assessment

    1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses and drinking water. In 
evaluating dietary exposure to GTL petroleum distillates, EPA 
considered exposure under the proposed exemption from the requirement 
of a tolerance. Dietary exposure to GTL petroleum distillates can occur 
when eating food treated with pesticide formulation containing this 
inert ingredient. Since an endpoint for risk assessment was not 
identified, a quantitative dietary exposure assessment for GTL 
petroleum distillates was not conducted.
    2. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is 
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary 
exposure (e.g., textiles (clothing and diapers), carpets, swimming 
pools, and hard surface disinfection on walls, floors, tables).
    GTL petroleum distillates may be used as an inert ingredient in 
agricultural pesticide products that could result in short- and 
intermediate-term residential exposure. Residential exposure can occur 
via dermal and inhalation routes of exposure to residential applicator. 
Dermal and inhalation exposure can occur from the use of consumer 
products and foods/food additives containing GTL petroleum distillates. 
Since an endpoint for risk assessment was not identified, a 
quantitative residential exposure assessment for GTL petroleum 
distillates was not conducted.
    3. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of 
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when 
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the 
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative 
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances 
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
    EPA has not found distillates, (Fischer-Tropsch), heavy, 
C18-C50, branched, cyclic and linear to share a 
common mechanism of toxicity with any other substances, and the 
category does not appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by 
other substances. For the purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, 
EPA has assumed that distillates, (Fischer-Tropsch), heavy, 
C18-C50, branched, cyclic and linear do not have 
a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. For information 
regarding EPA's efforts to determine which chemicals have a common 
mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of such 
chemicals, see EPA's Web site at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.

D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children

    1. In general. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA 
shall apply an additional tenfold (10x) margin of safety for infants 
and children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal 
and postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity 
and exposure unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a 
different margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. This 
additional margin of safety is commonly referred to as the Food Quality 
Protection Act Safety Factor (FQPA SF). In applying this provision, EPA 
either retains the default value of 10x, or uses a different additional 
safety factor when reliable data available to EPA support the choice of 
a different factor.
    At this time, there is no concern for potential sensitivity to 
infants and children resulting from exposures to GTL petroleum 
distillates. There is no reported quantitative or qualitative evidence 
of increased susceptibility of rat fetuses to in utero exposure to GTL 
petroleum distillates in developmental toxicity studies in rats. No 
quantitative or qualitative evidence of increased susceptibility has 
been reported following the pre/postnatal exposure to rats in 2-
generation reproduction toxicity studies in rats. Given the lack of 
adverse toxicological effects at limit dose levels, a safety factor 
analysis has not been used to assess the risk. For these reasons the 
additional tenfold safety factor is unnecessary.

E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety

    In examining aggregate exposure, EPA takes into account the 
available and reliable information concerning exposures to pesticide 
residues in food and drinking water, and non-occupational pesticide 
exposures. Dietary (food and drinking water) and non-dietary 
(residential) exposures of concern are not anticipated for GTL 
petroleum distillates because of its low toxicity based on animal 
studies showing toxicity at or above the limit dose of 1,000 mg/kg/day. 
Taking into consideration all available information on GTL petroleum 
distillates, EPA has determined that there is a reasonable certainty 
that no harm to any population subgroup, including infants and 
children, will result from aggregate exposure to GTL petroleum 
distillates under reasonably foreseeable circumstances. Therefore, the 
establishment of an exemption from

[[Page 42403]]

tolerance under 40 CFR 180.910 for residues of GTL petroleum 
distillates when used as an inert ingredient (solvent, diluent and/or 
dust suppressant) in pesticide formulations applied to growing crops 
and raw agricultural commodities after harvest is safe under FFDCA 
section 408.

V. Other Considerations

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since 
the Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a 
tolerance without any numerical limitation.

B. International Residue Limits

    In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S. 
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent 
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA 
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established 
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA 
section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations 
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food 
standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety 
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United 
States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from 
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain 
the reasons for departing from the Codex level.
    The Codex has not established a MRL for distillates, (Fischer-
Tropsch), heavy, C18-C50, branched, cyclic and 
linear.

VI. Conclusions

    Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is 
established under 40 CFR 180. 910 for distillates, (Fischer-Tropsch), 
heavy, C18-C50, branched, cyclic and linear (CAS 
Reg. No. 848301-69-9) when used as an inert ingredient (solvent, 
diluent and/or dust suppressant) in pesticide formulations applied to 
growing crops or raw agricultural commodities after harvest.

VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action establishes a tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in 
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from 
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and 
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been 
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not 
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning 
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or 
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled 
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any 
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any 
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal 
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and 
Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis 
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this 
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the 
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 
seq.), do not apply.
    This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food 
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this 
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and 
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions 
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that 
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or 
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government 
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between 
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has 
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled 
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this 
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded 
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would 
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant 
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

VIII. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), 
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required 
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and 
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of 
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' 
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: July 2, 2015.
Susan Lewis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.


0
2. In Sec.  180.910, add alphabetically the inert ingredient 
``Distillates, (Fishcher-Tropsch), heavy, C18-
C50, branched, cyclic and linear (CAS Reg. No. 848301-69-
9)'' to the table to read as follows:


Sec.  180.910  Inert ingredients used pre- and post-harvest; exemptions 
from the requirement of a tolerance.

* * * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Inert ingredients             Limits               Uses
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                              * * * * * * *
Distillates, (Fishcher-Tropsch),  .............  Solvent, diluent and/or
 heavy, C18-C50, branched,                        dust suppressant.
 cyclic and linear (CAS Reg. No.
 848301-69-9).
 
                              * * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 42404]]

[FR Doc. 2015-17630 Filed 7-16-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P



                                                  42400                       Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

                                                  § 180.242         Thiabendazole; tolerances for                         its metabolites and degradates, in or on                                only the sum of thiabendazole (2-(4-
                                                  residues.                                                               the specified agricultural commodities,                                 thiazolyl)benzimidazole) and its
                                                  *     *     *    *     *                                                resulting from use of the pesticide                                     metabolite benzimidazole (free and
                                                    (b) Section 18 emergency exemptions.                                  pursuant to FIFRA section 18                                            conjugated), calculated as the
                                                  Time-limited tolerances specified in the                                emergency exemptions. Compliance                                        stoichiometric equivalent of
                                                  following table are established for                                     with the tolerance levels specified                                     thiabendazole. The tolerances expire on
                                                  residues of the thiabendazole, including                                below is to be determined by measuring                                  the date specified in the table.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Parts per
                                                                                                                       Commodity                                                                                                 Expiration date
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  million

                                                  Pea, succulent shelled ....................................................................................................................................           0.02   December 31,
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                2018.



                                                  *        *        *        *         *                                  Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory                                 www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-
                                                  [FR Doc. 2015–17681 Filed 7–16–15; 8:45 am]                             Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the                                       idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
                                                  BILLING CODE 6560–50–P                                                  Environmental Protection Agency                                         40tab_02.tpl.
                                                                                                                          Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
                                                                                                                                                                                                  C. How can I file an objection or hearing
                                                                                                                          Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
                                                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION                                                                                                                        request?
                                                                                                                          Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
                                                  AGENCY                                                                  20460–0001. The Public Reading Room                                       Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
                                                                                                                          is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,                                    U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
                                                  40 CFR Part 180                                                         Monday through Friday, excluding legal                                  objection to any aspect of this regulation
                                                  [EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0585; FRL–9929–27]                                     holidays. The telephone number for the                                  and may also request a hearing on those
                                                                                                                          Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,                                  objections. You must file your objection
                                                  Distillates, (Fischer-Tropsch), Heavy,                                  and the telephone number for the OPP                                    or request a hearing on this regulation
                                                  C18-C50, Branched, Cyclic and Linear;                                   Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review                                 in accordance with the instructions
                                                  Exemption From the Requirement of a                                     the visitor instructions and additional                                 provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
                                                  Tolerance                                                               information about the docket available                                  proper receipt by EPA, you must
                                                  AGENCY:  Environmental Protection                                       at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.                                          identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
                                                  Agency (EPA).                                                           FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                                        OPP–2012–0585 in the subject line on
                                                                                                                          Susan Lewis, Director, Registration                                     the first page of your submission. All
                                                  ACTION: Final rule.
                                                                                                                          Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide                                   objections and requests for a hearing
                                                  SUMMARY:   This regulation establishes an                               Programs, Environmental Protection                                      must be in writing, and must be
                                                  exemption from the requirement of a                                     Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,                                     received by the Hearing Clerk on or
                                                  tolerance for residues of distillates,                                  Washington, DC 20460–0001; main                                         before September 15, 2015. Addresses
                                                  (Fischer-Tropsch), heavy, C18-C50,                                      telephone number: (703) 305–7090;                                       for mail and hand delivery of objections
                                                  branched, cyclic and linear when used                                   email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov.                                     and hearing requests are provided in 40
                                                  as an inert ingredient (solvent, diluent                                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                                              CFR 178.25(b).
                                                  and/or dust suppressant) in pesticide                                                                                                             In addition to filing an objection or
                                                  formulations applied to growing crops                                   I. General Information                                                  hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
                                                  and raw agricultural commodities after                                  A. Does this action apply to me?                                        as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
                                                  harvest. On behalf of Pennzoil-Quaker                                                                                                           submit a copy of the filing (excluding
                                                  State Company, Wagner Regulatory                                           You may be potentially affected by                                   any Confidential Business Information
                                                  Associates, submitted a petition to EPA                                 this action if you are an agricultural                                  (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
                                                  under the Federal Food, Drug, and                                       producer, food manufacturer, or                                         Information not marked confidential
                                                  Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting                                        pesticide manufacturer. The following                                   pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
                                                  establishment of an exemption from the                                  list of North American Industrial                                       disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
                                                  requirement of a tolerance. This                                        Classification System (NAICS) codes is                                  notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
                                                  regulation eliminates the need to                                       not intended to be exhaustive, but rather                               objection or hearing request, identified
                                                  establish a maximum permissible level                                   provides a guide to help readers                                        by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
                                                  for residues of distillates, (Fischer-                                  determine whether this document                                         2012–0585, by one of the following
                                                  Tropsch), heavy, C18-C50, branched,                                     applies to them. Potentially affected                                   methods:
                                                                                                                          entities may include:
                                                  cyclic and linear.
                                                                                                                             • Crop production (NAICS code 111).                                    • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
                                                  DATES: This regulation is effective July                                                                                                        www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
                                                                                                                             • Animal production (NAICS code
                                                  17, 2015. Objections and requests for                                   112).                                                                   instructions for submitting comments.
                                                  hearings must be received on or before                                     • Food manufacturing (NAICS code                                     Do not submit electronically any
                                                  September 15, 2015, and must be filed                                   311).                                                                   information you consider to be CBI or
                                                  in accordance with the instructions                                        • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS                                     other information whose disclosure is
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                  provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also                                   code 32532).                                                            restricted by statute.
                                                  Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY                                                                                                                    • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
                                                  INFORMATION).                                                           B. How can I get electronic access to                                   Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
                                                  ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
                                                                                                                          other related information?                                              DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
                                                  identified by docket identification (ID)                                  You may access a frequently updated                                   NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
                                                  number EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0585, is                                         electronic version of 40 CFR part 180                                     • Hand Delivery: To make special
                                                  available at                                                            through the Government Printing                                         arrangements for hand delivery or
                                                  http://www.regulations.gov or at the                                    Office’s e-CFR site at http://                                          delivery of boxed information, please


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014        17:58 Jul 16, 2015       Jkt 235001      PO 00000      Frm 00028       Fmt 4700      Sfmt 4700      E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM             17JYR1


                                                                       Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations                                           42401

                                                  follow the instructions at http://                       from the requirement for a tolerance (the             validity, completeness, and reliability as
                                                  www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.                       legal limit for a pesticide chemical                  well as the relationship of the results of
                                                    Additional instructions on                             residue in or on a food) only if EPA                  the studies to human risk. EPA has also
                                                  commenting or visiting the docket,                       determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’            considered available information
                                                  along with more information about                        Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA                     concerning the variability of the
                                                  dockets generally, is available at http://               defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a            sensitivities of major identifiable
                                                  www.epa.gov/dockets.                                     reasonable certainty that no harm will                subgroups of consumers, including
                                                  II. Petition for Exemption                               result from aggregate exposure to the                 infants and children. Specific
                                                                                                           pesticide chemical residue, including                 information on the studies received and
                                                     In the Federal Register of February                   all anticipated dietary exposures and all             the nature of the adverse effects caused
                                                  27, 2013 (78 FR 13295) (FRL–9380–2),                     other exposures for which there is                    by distillates, (Fischer-Tropsch), heavy,
                                                  EPA issued a document pursuant to                        reliable information.’’ This includes                 C18-C50, branched, cyclic and linear
                                                  FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C. 346a,                       exposure through drinking water and in                (also known as GTL petroleum
                                                  announcing the filing of a pesticide                     residential settings, but does not include            distillates) as well as the no-observed-
                                                  petition (PP 2E8049) by Wagner                           occupational exposure. Section                        adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) and the
                                                  Regulatory Associates, P.O. Box 640,                     408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to                 lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level
                                                  7217 Lancaster Pike, Suite A,                            give special consideration to exposure                (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies are
                                                  Hockessin, DE 19707 on behalf of                         of infants and children to the pesticide              discussed in this unit.
                                                  Pennzoil-Quaker State Company, 700                       chemical residue in establishing a                       The acute oral lethal dose (LD)50 is
                                                  Milam Street, Houston, TX 77002. The                     tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a             5,000 milligrams/kilograms (mg/kg) in
                                                  petition requested that 40 CFR 180.910                   reasonable certainty that no harm will                rats. An acute dermal toxicity study was
                                                  be amended by establishing an                            result to infants and children from                   not conducted. There were no available
                                                  exemption from the requirement of a                      aggregate exposure to the pesticide                   dermal irritation data. It is not irritating
                                                  tolerance for residues of distillates,                   chemical residue. . . .’’                             to the rabbit eye. It is not a skin
                                                  (Fischer-Tropsch), heavy, C18-C50,                          EPA establishes exemptions from the                sensitizer in the guinea pig.
                                                  branched, cyclic and linear (CAS Reg.                    requirement of a tolerance only in those                 In a 90-day oral toxicity study, GTL
                                                  No. 848301–69–9) when used as an inert                   cases where it can be clearly                         petroleum distillates administered by
                                                  ingredient as a solvent, diluent and/or                  demonstrated that the risks from                      gavage resulted in a statistically
                                                  dust suppressant in pesticide                            aggregate exposure to pesticide                       significant increase in the incidence and
                                                  formulations applied to growing crops                    chemical residues under reasonably                    severity of alveolar macrophage
                                                  and raw agricultural commodities after                   foreseeable circumstances will pose no                accumulations and increased
                                                  harvest. That document referenced a                      appreciable risks to human health. In                 vacuolation of alveolar macrophages in
                                                  summary of the petition prepared by                      order to determine the risks from                     the lung in rats at the lowest observed
                                                  Wagner Regulatory Associates on behalf                   aggregate exposure to pesticide inert                 adverse effect level (LOAEL) 200 mg/kg/
                                                  of the Pennzoil-Quaker State Company,                    ingredients, the Agency considers the                 day. The No Observed Adverse Effect
                                                  the petitioner, which is available in the                toxicity of the inert in conjunction with             Level (NOAEL) was 50 mg/kg/day.
                                                  docket, http://www.regulations.gov.                      possible exposure to residues of the                     In a 2-generation reproductive toxicity
                                                  There were no comments received in                       inert ingredient through food, drinking               study via gavage in rats, GTL petroleum
                                                  response to the notice of filing.                        water, and through other exposures that               distillates caused maternal and offspring
                                                                                                           occur as a result of pesticide use in                 toxicity at 1,000 mg/kg/day. Toxicity
                                                  III. Inert Ingredient Definition                         residential settings. If EPA is able to               was manifested as chronic interstitial/
                                                     Inert ingredients are all ingredients                 determine that a finite tolerance is not              alveolus inflammation in the lungs. The
                                                  that are not active ingredients as defined               necessary to ensure that there is a                   NOAEL for parental toxicity was 50 mg/
                                                  in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are                   reasonable certainty that no harm will                kg/day since animals in the mid dose
                                                  not limited to, the following types of                   result from aggregate exposure to the                 (250 mg/kg/day) group were not
                                                  ingredients (except when they have a                     inert ingredient, an exemption from the               analyzed. The reproduction NOAEL was
                                                  pesticidal efficacy of their own):                       requirement of a tolerance may be                     1,000 mg/kg/day, the highest dose
                                                  Solvents such as alcohols and                            established.                                          tested.
                                                  hydrocarbons; surfactants such as                           Consistent with FFDCA section                         Based upon subsequent studies
                                                  polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty                       408(c)(2)(A), and the factors specified in            conducted to evaluate the lung effects,
                                                  acids; carriers such as clay and                         FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), EPA has                   the Agency determined that the effects
                                                  diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as                   reviewed the available scientific data                observed in the 90-day oral toxicity
                                                  carrageenan and modified cellulose;                      and other relevant information in                     study and 2-generation reproductive
                                                  wetting, spreading, and dispersing                       support of this action. EPA has                       toxicity study were caused by gavage
                                                  agents; propellants in aerosol                           sufficient data to assess the hazards of              administration error and were not test
                                                  dispensers; microencapsulating agents;                   and to make a determination on                        material (dose) related. In a 28-day oral
                                                  and emulsifiers. The term ‘‘inert’’ is not               aggregate exposure for distillates,                   feeding study in rats at doses up to
                                                  intended to imply nontoxicity; the                       (Fischer-Tropsch), heavy, C18-C50,                    1,256 mg/kg/day, no adverse effects
                                                  ingredient may or may not be                             branched, cyclic and linear including                 were observed. In a prenatal
                                                  chemically active. Generally, EPA has                    exposure resulting from the exemption                 developmental toxicity study in the rat
                                                  exempted inert ingredients from the                      established by this action. EPA’s                     (by oral gavage) at doses up to 1,000 mg/
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                  requirement of a tolerance based on the                  assessment of exposures and risks                     kg/day, no adverse toxicological effects
                                                  low toxicity of the individual inert                     associated with distillates, (Fischer-                were seen. The results of these two more
                                                  ingredients.                                             Tropsch), heavy, C18-C50, branched,                   recent studies alleviated the Agency’s
                                                                                                           cyclic and linear follows.                            concern for the lung effects seen in the
                                                  IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and                                                                              90-day oral toxicity study and the 2-
                                                  Determination of Safety                                  A. Toxicological Profile                              generation reproduction study.
                                                     Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA                        EPA has evaluated the available                        GTL petroleum distillates were
                                                  allows EPA to establish an exemption                     toxicity data and considered their                    evaluated for mutagenic potential using


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:58 Jul 16, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00029   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM   17JYR1


                                                  42402                Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

                                                  the Ames test, micronucleus assay, and                   C. Exposure Assessment                                see EPA’s Web site at http://
                                                  gene mutation in mammalian cells.                           1. Dietary exposure from food and                  www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
                                                  These studies were negative for the                      feed uses and drinking water. In                      D. Safety Factor for Infants and
                                                  induction of mutations and aberrations.                  evaluating dietary exposure to GTL                    Children
                                                  Therefore, GTL petroleum distillates are                 petroleum distillates, EPA considered
                                                  considered non-mutagenic.                                                                                        1. In general. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of
                                                                                                           exposure under the proposed exemption                 FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply
                                                     A neurotoxicity study was not                         from the requirement of a tolerance.
                                                  conducted with GTL petroleum                                                                                   an additional tenfold (10×) margin of
                                                                                                           Dietary exposure to GTL petroleum                     safety for infants and children in the
                                                  distillates. However, signs of                           distillates can occur when eating food
                                                  neurotoxicity were not observed in                                                                             case of threshold effects to account for
                                                                                                           treated with pesticide formulation                    prenatal and postnatal toxicity and the
                                                  acute toxicity tests at doses up to 5,000                containing this inert ingredient. Since
                                                  mg/kg body weight (bw)/day. Evidence                                                                           completeness of the database on toxicity
                                                                                                           an endpoint for risk assessment was not               and exposure unless EPA determines
                                                  of neurotoxicity was not observed in the                 identified, a quantitative dietary
                                                  90-day oral toxicity study in rats and in                                                                      based on reliable data that a different
                                                                                                           exposure assessment for GTL petroleum                 margin of safety will be safe for infants
                                                  the 28-day oral feeding study in rats.                   distillates was not conducted.
                                                     An immunotoxicity study was not                                                                             and children. This additional margin of
                                                                                                              2. From non-dietary exposure. The                  safety is commonly referred to as the
                                                  conducted with GTL petroleum                             term ‘‘residential exposure’’ is used in              Food Quality Protection Act Safety
                                                  distillates. However, alveolar                           this document to refer to non-                        Factor (FQPA SF). In applying this
                                                  macrophage accumulations and                             occupational, non-dietary exposure                    provision, EPA either retains the default
                                                  increased vacuolation of alveolar                        (e.g., textiles (clothing and diapers),               value of 10×, or uses a different
                                                  macrophages in the lung was observed                     carpets, swimming pools, and hard                     additional safety factor when reliable
                                                  in rats at >200 mg/kg/day in both the                    surface disinfection on walls, floors,                data available to EPA support the choice
                                                  90-day oral and 2-generation                             tables).                                              of a different factor.
                                                  reproduction toxicity studies. However,                     GTL petroleum distillates may be                     At this time, there is no concern for
                                                  these effects were determined to be                      used as an inert ingredient in                        potential sensitivity to infants and
                                                  caused by gavage technique error rather                  agricultural pesticide products that                  children resulting from exposures to
                                                  than effects attributable to the test                    could result in short- and intermediate-              GTL petroleum distillates. There is no
                                                  substance.                                               term residential exposure. Residential                reported quantitative or qualitative
                                                     There are no data specific to the                     exposure can occur via dermal and                     evidence of increased susceptibility of
                                                  absorption, metabolism, distribution                     inhalation routes of exposure to                      rat fetuses to in utero exposure to GTL
                                                  and elimination of GTL petroleum                         residential applicator. Dermal and                    petroleum distillates in developmental
                                                  distillates, however, the absorption of                  inhalation exposure can occur from the                toxicity studies in rats. No quantitative
                                                  other mixtures of normal, branched and                   use of consumer products and foods/                   or qualitative evidence of increased
                                                  cyclic petroleum derived hydrocarbons                    food additives containing GTL                         susceptibility has been reported
                                                  is inversely related to carbon chain                     petroleum distillates. Since an endpoint              following the pre/postnatal exposure to
                                                  length and is independent of isomeric                    for risk assessment was not identified, a             rats in 2-generation reproduction
                                                  form, preparation process or type of                     quantitative residential exposure                     toxicity studies in rats. Given the lack
                                                  product. Consequently, when                              assessment for GTL petroleum                          of adverse toxicological effects at limit
                                                  administered orally, Fischer-Tropsch                     distillates was not conducted.                        dose levels, a safety factor analysis has
                                                  derived hydrocarbons in the range of                        3. Cumulative effects from substances              not been used to assess the risk. For
                                                  C18-C50 are likely to be unabsorbed and                  with a common mechanism of toxicity.                  these reasons the additional tenfold
                                                  excreted in the feces.                                   Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA                      safety factor is unnecessary.
                                                     Carcinogenicity studies with GTL                      requires that, when considering whether
                                                  petroleum distillates are not available                  to establish, modify, or revoke a                     E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of
                                                  for review. However, based on the lack                   tolerance, the Agency consider                        Safety
                                                  of carcinogenicity of related linear,                    ‘‘available information’’ concerning the                In examining aggregate exposure, EPA
                                                  branched, and cyclic alkanes and the                     cumulative effects of a particular                    takes into account the available and
                                                  negligible absorption of GTL petroleum                   pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other                      reliable information concerning
                                                  distillates, lack of systemic toxicity at                substances that have a common                         exposures to pesticide residues in food
                                                  the limit dose, lack of mutagenic                        mechanism of toxicity.’’                              and drinking water, and non-
                                                  concerns, GTL petroleum distillates are                     EPA has not found distillates,                     occupational pesticide exposures.
                                                  not expected to be carcinogenic.                         (Fischer-Tropsch), heavy, C18-C50,                    Dietary (food and drinking water) and
                                                                                                           branched, cyclic and linear to share a                non-dietary (residential) exposures of
                                                  B. Toxicological Points of Departure/
                                                                                                           common mechanism of toxicity with                     concern are not anticipated for GTL
                                                  Levels of Concern
                                                                                                           any other substances, and the category                petroleum distillates because of its low
                                                    There were no adverse effects in                       does not appear to produce a toxic                    toxicity based on animal studies
                                                  repeat dose toxicity, reproductive, and                  metabolite produced by other                          showing toxicity at or above the limit
                                                  developmental studies with GTL                           substances. For the purposes of this                  dose of 1,000 mg/kg/day. Taking into
                                                  petroleum distillates at or above limit                  tolerance action, therefore, EPA has                  consideration all available information
                                                  dose levels to either parental animals or                assumed that distillates, (Fischer-                   on GTL petroleum distillates, EPA has
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                  their offspring. Thus, due to the low                    Tropsch), heavy, C18-C50, branched,                   determined that there is a reasonable
                                                  potential hazard and lack of hazard                      cyclic and linear do not have a common                certainty that no harm to any population
                                                  endpoint, the Agency has determined                      mechanism of toxicity with other                      subgroup, including infants and
                                                  that a quantitative risk assessment using                substances. For information regarding                 children, will result from aggregate
                                                  safety factors applied to a point of                     EPA’s efforts to determine which                      exposure to GTL petroleum distillates
                                                  departure protective of an identified                    chemicals have a common mechanism                     under reasonably foreseeable
                                                  hazard endpoint is not appropriate for                   of toxicity and to evaluate the                       circumstances. Therefore, the
                                                  GTL petroleum distillates.                               cumulative effects of such chemicals,                 establishment of an exemption from


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:58 Jul 16, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00030   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM   17JYR1


                                                                       Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations                                                            42403

                                                  tolerance under 40 CFR 180.910 for                           VII. Statutory and Executive Order                            ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
                                                  residues of GTL petroleum distillates                        Reviews                                                       1999) and Executive Order 13175,
                                                  when used as an inert ingredient                                This action establishes a tolerance                        entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
                                                  (solvent, diluent and/or dust                                under FFDCA section 408(d) in                                 with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
                                                  suppressant) in pesticide formulations                       response to a petition submitted to the                       67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
                                                  applied to growing crops and raw                             Agency. The Office of Management and                          to this action. In addition, this action
                                                  agricultural commodities after harvest is                    Budget (OMB) has exempted these types                         does not impose any enforceable duty or
                                                  safe under FFDCA section 408.                                of actions from review under Executive                        contain any unfunded mandate as
                                                                                                               Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory                            described under Title II of the Unfunded
                                                  V. Other Considerations                                      Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,                           Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
                                                  A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology                        October 4, 1993). Because this action                         1501 et seq.).
                                                                                                               has been exempted from review under                              This action does not involve any
                                                     An analytical method is not required                      Executive Order 12866, this action is                         technical standards that would require
                                                  for enforcement purposes since the                           not subject to Executive Order 13211,                         Agency consideration of voluntary
                                                  Agency is establishing an exemption                          entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning                                 consensus standards pursuant to section
                                                  from the requirement of a tolerance                          Regulations That Significantly Affect                         12(d) of the National Technology
                                                  without any numerical limitation.                            Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66                     Transfer and Advancement Act
                                                                                                               FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive                          (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
                                                  B. International Residue Limits                              Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of                         VIII. Congressional Review Act
                                                                                                               Children from Environmental Health
                                                     In making its tolerance decisions, EPA                                                                                    Pursuant to the Congressional Review
                                                                                                               Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
                                                  seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with                                                                                    Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
                                                                                                               April 23, 1997). This action does not
                                                  international standards whenever                             contain any information collections                           submit a report containing this rule and
                                                  possible, consistent with U.S. food                          subject to OMB approval under the                             other required information to the U.S.
                                                  safety standards and agricultural                            Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44                             Senate, the U.S. House of
                                                  practices. EPA considers the                                 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require                     Representatives, and the Comptroller
                                                  international maximum residue limits                         any special considerations under                              General of the United States prior to
                                                  (MRLs) established by the Codex                              Executive Order 12898, entitled                               publication of the rule in the Federal
                                                  Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as                          ‘‘Federal Actions to Address                                  Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
                                                  required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4).                         Environmental Justice in Minority                             rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
                                                  The Codex Alimentarius is a joint                            Populations and Low-Income                                    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
                                                  United Nations Food and Agriculture                          Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
                                                  Organization/World Health                                    1994).                                                          Environmental protection,
                                                  Organization food standards program,                            Since tolerances and exemptions that                       Administrative practice and procedure,
                                                  and it is recognized as an international                     are established on the basis of a petition                    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
                                                  food safety standards-setting                                under FFDCA section 408(d), such as                           and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
                                                  organization in trade agreements to                          the tolerance in this final rule, do not                      requirements.
                                                  which the United States is a party. EPA                      require the issuance of a proposed rule,                        Dated: July 2, 2015.
                                                                                                               the requirements of the Regulatory                            Susan Lewis,
                                                  may establish a tolerance that is
                                                                                                               Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
                                                  different from a Codex MRL; however,                                                                                       Director, Registration Division, Office of
                                                                                                               seq.), do not apply.                                          Pesticide Programs.
                                                  FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that                           This action directly regulates growers,
                                                  EPA explain the reasons for departing                        food processors, food handlers, and food                        Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
                                                  from the Codex level.                                        retailers, not States or tribes, nor does                     amended as follows:
                                                     The Codex has not established a MRL                       this action alter the relationships or
                                                  for distillates, (Fischer-Tropsch), heavy,                   distribution of power and                                     PART 180—[AMENDED]
                                                  C18-C50, branched, cyclic and linear.                        responsibilities established by Congress
                                                                                                                                                                             ■ 1. The authority citation for part 180
                                                                                                               in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
                                                  VI. Conclusions                                                                                                            continues to read as follows:
                                                                                                               section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
                                                                                                               has determined that this action will not                          Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
                                                    Therefore, an exemption from the
                                                                                                               have a substantial direct effect on States                      2. In § 180.910, add alphabetically the
                                                  requirement of a tolerance is established                                                                                  ■
                                                                                                               or tribal governments, on the                                 inert ingredient ‘‘Distillates, (Fishcher-
                                                  under 40 CFR 180. 910 for distillates,
                                                                                                               relationship between the national                             Tropsch), heavy, C18-C50, branched,
                                                  (Fischer-Tropsch), heavy, C18-C50,                           government and the States or tribal
                                                  branched, cyclic and linear (CAS Reg.                                                                                      cyclic and linear (CAS Reg. No. 848301–
                                                                                                               governments, or on the distribution of                        69–9)’’ to the table to read as follows:
                                                  No. 848301–69–9) when used as an inert                       power and responsibilities among the
                                                  ingredient (solvent, diluent and/or dust                     various levels of government or between                       § 180.910 Inert ingredients used pre- and
                                                  suppressant) in pesticide formulations                       the Federal Government and Indian                             post-harvest; exemptions from the
                                                  applied to growing crops or raw                              tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined                       requirement of a tolerance.
                                                  agricultural commodities after harvest.                      that Executive Order 13132, entitled                          *       *     *       *   *
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                                              Inert ingredients                                           Limits                                         Uses


                                                             *                   *                   *                                        *                        *                    *                     *
                                                  Distillates, (Fishcher-Tropsch), heavy, C18-C50, branched, cyclic                     ..............   Solvent, diluent and/or dust suppressant.
                                                    and linear (CAS Reg. No. 848301–69–9).

                                                            *                           *                           *                          *                        *                      *                  *



                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:58 Jul 16, 2015       Jkt 235001   PO 00000       Frm 00031   Fmt 4700       Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM   17JYR1


                                                  42404                Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

                                                  [FR Doc. 2015–17630 Filed 7–16–15; 8:45 am]              at protecting lives and new construction              met prior to the effective suspension
                                                  BILLING CODE 6560–50–P                                   from future flooding. Section 1315 of                 date. Since these notifications were
                                                                                                           the National Flood Insurance Act of                   made, this final rule may take effect
                                                                                                           1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4022,                     within less than 30 days.
                                                  DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND                                   prohibits the sale of NFIP flood                         National Environmental Policy Act.
                                                  SECURITY                                                 insurance unless an appropriate public                This rule is categorically excluded from
                                                                                                           body adopts adequate floodplain                       the requirements of 44 CFR part 10,
                                                  Federal Emergency Management                             management measures with effective                    Environmental Considerations. No
                                                  Agency                                                   enforcement measures. The                             environmental impact assessment has
                                                                                                           communities listed in this document no                been prepared.
                                                  44 CFR Part 64                                           longer meet that statutory requirement                   Regulatory Flexibility Act. The
                                                                                                           for compliance with program                           Administrator has determined that this
                                                  [Docket ID FEMA– 2015–0001; Internal                     regulations, 44 CFR part 59.
                                                  Agency Docket No. FEMA–8387]                                                                                   rule is exempt from the requirements of
                                                                                                           Accordingly, the communities will be                  the Regulatory Flexibility Act because
                                                  Suspension of Community Eligibility                      suspended on the effective date in the                the National Flood Insurance Act of
                                                                                                           third column. As of that date, flood                  1968, as amended, Section 1315, 42
                                                  AGENCY:  Federal Emergency                               insurance will no longer be available in              U.S.C. 4022, prohibits flood insurance
                                                  Management Agency, DHS.                                  the community. We recognize that some                 coverage unless an appropriate public
                                                  ACTION: Final rule.                                      of these communities may adopt and                    body adopts adequate floodplain
                                                                                                           submit the required documentation of                  management measures with effective
                                                  SUMMARY:    This rule identifies                         legally enforceable floodplain                        enforcement measures. The
                                                  communities where the sale of flood                      management measures after this rule is                communities listed no longer comply
                                                  insurance has been authorized under                      published but prior to the actual                     with the statutory requirements, and
                                                  the National Flood Insurance Program                     suspension date. These communities                    after the effective date, flood insurance
                                                  (NFIP) that are scheduled for                            will not be suspended and will continue               will no longer be available in the
                                                  suspension on the effective dates listed                 to be eligible for the sale of NFIP flood             communities unless remedial action
                                                  within this rule because of                              insurance. A notice withdrawing the                   takes place.
                                                  noncompliance with the floodplain                        suspension of such communities will be
                                                                                                                                                                    Regulatory Classification. This final
                                                  management requirements of the                           published in the Federal Register.
                                                                                                              In addition, FEMA publishes a Flood                rule is not a significant regulatory action
                                                  program. If the Federal Emergency                                                                              under the criteria of section 3(f) of
                                                  Management Agency (FEMA) receives                        Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) that
                                                                                                           identifies the Special Flood Hazard                   Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
                                                  documentation that the community has                                                                           1993, Regulatory Planning and Review,
                                                  adopted the required floodplain                          Areas (SFHAs) in these communities.
                                                                                                           The date of the FIRM, if one has been                 58 FR 51735.
                                                  management measures prior to the
                                                                                                           published, is indicated in the fourth                    Executive Order 13132, Federalism.
                                                  effective suspension date given in this
                                                                                                           column of the table. No direct Federal                This rule involves no policies that have
                                                  rule, the suspension will not occur and
                                                                                                           financial assistance (except assistance               federalism implications under Executive
                                                  a notice of this will be provided by
                                                                                                           pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford                    Order 13132.
                                                  publication in the Federal Register on a
                                                                                                           Disaster Relief and Emergency                            Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
                                                  subsequent date. Also, information
                                                                                                           Assistance Act not in connection with a               Reform. This rule meets the applicable
                                                  identifying the current participation
                                                                                                           flood) may be provided for construction               standards of Executive Order 12988.
                                                  status of a community can be obtained
                                                  from FEMA’s Community Status Book                        or acquisition of buildings in identified                Paperwork Reduction Act. This rule
                                                  (CSB). The CSB is available at http://                   SFHAs for communities not                             does not involve any collection of
                                                  www.fema.gov/fema/csb.shtm.                              participating in the NFIP and identified              information for purposes of the
                                                                                                           for more than a year on FEMA’s initial                Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
                                                  DATES: The effective date of each
                                                                                                           FIRM for the community as having                      3501 et seq.
                                                  community’s scheduled suspension is
                                                                                                           flood-prone areas (section 202(a) of the              List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 64
                                                  the third date (‘‘Susp.’’) listed in the
                                                                                                           Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973,
                                                  third column of the following tables.                                                                            Flood insurance, Floodplains.
                                                                                                           42 U.S.C. 4106(a), as amended). This
                                                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If                      prohibition against certain types of                    Accordingly, 44 CFR part 64 is
                                                  you want to determine whether a                          Federal assistance becomes effective for              amended as follows:
                                                  particular community was suspended                       the communities listed on the date
                                                  on the suspension date or for further                    shown in the last column. The                         PART 64—[AMENDED]
                                                  information, contact Bret Gates, Federal                 Administrator finds that notice and
                                                  Insurance and Mitigation                                 public comment procedures under 5                     ■ 1. The authority citation for Part 64
                                                  Administration, Federal Emergency                        U.S.C. 553(b), are impracticable and                  continues to read as follows:
                                                  Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,                     unnecessary because communities listed                  Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.;
                                                  Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4133.                    in this final rule have been adequately               Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR,
                                                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NFIP                      notified.                                             1978 Comp.; p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367,
                                                  enables property owners to purchase                         Each community receives 6-month,                   3 CFR, 1979 Comp.; p. 376.
                                                  Federal flood insurance that is not                      90-day, and 30-day notification letters
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                                                                                                                                 § 64.6    [Amended]
                                                  otherwise generally available from                       addressed to the Chief Executive Officer
                                                  private insurers. In return, communities                 stating that the community will be                    ■ 2. The tables published under the
                                                  agree to adopt and administer local                      suspended unless the required                         authority of § 64.6 are amended as
                                                  floodplain management measures aimed                     floodplain management measures are                    follows:




                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:58 Jul 16, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00032   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\17JYR1.SGM    17JYR1



Document Created: 2018-02-23 09:21:03
Document Modified: 2018-02-23 09:21:03
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal rule.
DatesThis regulation is effective July 17, 2015. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before September 15, 2015, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ContactSusan Lewis, Director, Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-
FR Citation80 FR 42400 
CFR AssociatedEnvironmental Protection; Administrative Practice and Procedure; Agricultural Commodities; Pesticides and Pests and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR