80 FR 42459 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Adoption of Control Techniques Guidelines for Metal Furniture Coatings and Miscellaneous Metal Parts Coatings
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 137 (July 17, 2015)
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 137 (July 17, 2015)
| Page Range | 42459-42462 | |
| FR Document | 2015-17470 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 137 (Friday, July 17, 2015)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 42459-42462] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-17470] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R03-OAR-2015-0404; FRL-9930-61-Region 3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Adoption of Control Techniques Guidelines for Metal Furniture Coatings and Miscellaneous Metal Parts Coatings AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Maryland (Maryland). This revision includes amendments to Maryland's regulation for the control of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and meets the requirement to adopt reasonably available control technology (RACT) for sources covered by EPA's Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) standards for coatings for metal furniture and miscellaneous metal parts. These amendments will reduce emissions of VOC from these source categories and help Maryland attain and maintain the national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for ozone. This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 17, 2015. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA- R03-OAR-2015-0404 by one of the following methods: A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. B. Email: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov. C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2015-0404, Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director, Office of Air Program Planning, Mailcode 3AP30, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address. Such [[Page 42460]] deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR- 2015-0404. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change, and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI, or otherwise protected, through www.regulations.gov or email. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal are available at the Maryland Department of the Environment, 1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore, Maryland 21230. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Schmitt, (215) 814-5787, or by email at schmitt.ellen@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 28, 2014, the State of Maryland through the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) submitted a revision to its SIP concerning the adoption of the coating standards located in the Metal Furniture Coatings and the Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings CTGs. I. Background Section 172(c)(1) of the CAA provides that SIPs for nonattainment areas must include reasonably available control measures (RACM), including RACT for sources of emissions. Section 182(b)(2)(A) provides that for certain nonattainment areas, states must revise their SIPs to include RACT for sources of VOC emissions covered by a CTG document issued after November 15, 1990 and prior to the area's date of attainment. In developing these CTGs, EPA, among other things, evaluates the sources of VOC emissions from these categories, and the available control approaches for addressing these categories, including the cost of such approaches. Based on available information and data, EPA provides recommendations for RACT for VOC from these categories. States can follow the CTGs and adopt state regulations to implement the recommendations contained therein, or they can adopt alternative approaches. In either case, states must submit their RACT rules to EPA for review and approval as part of the SIP process. EPA will evaluate the rules and determine, through notice and comment rulemaking in the SIP approval process, whether the submitted rules meet the RACT requirements of the CAA and EPA's regulations. In September 2007, EPA published a new CTG for Metal Furniture Coatings (EPA-453/R-07-005), and in September 2008, EPA published a new CTG for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings (EPA-453/R-08- 003). These CTGs discuss the nature of VOC emissions from these industries, the available control technologies for addressing such emissions, the cost of available control options, and other information. EPA developed new CTGs for these industries after reviewing existing state and local VOC emission reduction approaches, new source performance standards (NSPS), previously issued CTGs, and national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for these source categories. A. Metal Furniture Coatings Metal furniture coatings include the coatings that are applied to the surfaces of metal furniture. A metal furniture substrate is the furniture or components of furniture constructed either entirely or partially from metal. Metal furniture includes, but is not limited to, the following types of products: Household, office, institutional, laboratory, hospital, public building, restaurant, barber and beauty shop, and dental furniture, as well as components of these products. Metal furniture also includes office and store fixtures, partitions, shelving, lockers, lamps and lighting fixtures, and wastebaskets. Metal furniture coatings include paints and adhesives and are typically applied without a primer. Higher solids and powder coatings are used extensively in the metal furniture surface coating industry. Metal furniture coatings provide a covering, finish, or functional or protective layer, and can also provide a decorative finish to metal furniture. B. Miscellaneous Metal Parts Coatings Miscellaneous metal parts surface coating categories include the coatings that are applied to the surfaces of a varied range of metal parts and products. These parts or products are constructed either entirely or partially from metal. They include, but are not limited to, metal components of the following types of products as well as the products themselves: Fabricated metal products, small and large farm machinery, commercial and industrial machinery and equipment, automotive or transportation equipment, interior or exterior automotive parts, construction equipment, motor vehicle accessories, bicycles and sporting goods, toys, recreational vehicles, pleasure craft (recreational boats), extruded aluminum structural components, railroad cars, heavier vehicles,\1\ lawn and garden equipment, business machines, laboratory and medical equipment, electronic equipment, steel drums, metal pipes, and numerous other industrial and household products (hereinafter collectively referred to as ``miscellaneous metal parts.'') The CTG applies to manufacturers of miscellaneous metal parts that surface-coat the parts they produce. Miscellaneous metal parts coatings do not include coatings that are a part of other product categories listed under section 183(e) of the CAA for which [[Page 42461]] CTGs have been published or coatings addressed by other CTGs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Heavier vehicles includes all vehicles that meet the definition of the term ``other motor vehicles,'' as defined in the National Emission Standards for Surface Coating of Automobile and Light-Duty Trucks at 40 CFR 63.3176. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Summary of SIP Revision On July 28, 2014, MDE submitted to EPA a SIP revision (#14-02) concerning the adoption of the emission limits for metal furniture coatings found in the Metal Furniture Coatings CTG and miscellaneous metal parts coatings found in the Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings CTG.\2\ Maryland has adopted EPA's CTG standards for metal furniture and miscellaneous metal parts coating processes by amending Regulation .08 under COMAR 26.11.19, Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Sources. Specifically, this revision amends the existing regulation in section 26.11.19.08 by adding coating standards for both metal furniture and miscellaneous metal parts that are either equal to or more stringent than the coating standards found in EPA's CTGs. Additionally, new definitions and application methods were added to COMAR section 26.11.19.08. Tables 1 and 2 outline the emissions standards adopted by Maryland for metal furniture coatings and miscellaneous metal parts coatings. A detailed summary of EPA's review of and rationale for proposing to approve this SIP revision may be found in the Technical Support Document (TSD) for this action which is available online at regulations.gov, Docket number EPA-R03-OAR-2015- 0404. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ Maryland previously submitted, and EPA subsequently approved, a SIP revision to meet the requirements to adopt RACT for plastic part coatings covered by the CTG for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings. See 76 FR 64020 (October 17, 2011). Table 1--Metal Furniture Coating VOC Content Limits--VOC Content Limits are Expressed as Mass (Kilogram (kg) or Pound (lb)) Per Volume (Liter (l)) of Coating Less Water and Exempt Compounds, as Applied ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Air-dried Baked --------------------------------------------------------------- Coating kg VOC/l lb VOC/l kg VOC/l lb VOC/l coating coating coating coating ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Extreme high gloss.............................. 0.340 2.8 0.360 3.0 Extreme performance............................. 0.420 3.5 0.360 3.0 General, multi-component........................ 0.340 2.8 0.275 2.3 General, one-component.......................... 0.275 2.3 0.275 2.3 Metallic........................................ 0.420 3.5 0.420 3.5 Pretreatment.................................... 0.420 3.5 0.420 3.5 Solar absorbent................................. 0.420 3.5 0.360 3.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table 2--Miscellaneous Metal Parts Coating VOC Content Limits--VOC Content Limits are Expressed as Mass (Kilogram (kg) or Pound (lb)) Per Volume (Liter (l)) of Coating Less Water and Exempt Compounds, as Applied ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Air-dried Baked --------------------------------------------------------------- Coating kg VOC/l lb VOC/l kg VOC/l lb VOC/l coating coating coating coating ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adhesion promoter............................... 0.479 4.0 0.479 4.0 Camouflage...................................... 0.340 2.8 0.420 3.5 Electric insulating varnish..................... 0.340 2.8 0.420 3.5 Etching filler.................................. 0.340 2.8 0.420 3.5 Extreme high-gloss.............................. 0.420 3.5 0.360 3.0 Extreme performance............................. 0.420 3.5 0.360 3.0 General, multi-component........................ 0.340 2.8 0.275 2.3 General, one-component.......................... 0.340 2.8 0.275 2.3 Heat-resistant.................................. 0.420 3.5 0.360 3.0 High performance architectural.................. 0.420 3.5 0.360 3.0 High temperature................................ 0.340 2.8 0.420 3.5 Military specification.......................... 0.340 2.8 0.280 2.3 Metallic........................................ 0.340 2.8 0.420 3.5 Mold-seal....................................... 0.340 2.8 0.420 3.5 Pan backing..................................... 0.340 2.8 0.420 3.5 Prefabricated architectural multi-component..... 0.420 3.5 0.280 2.3 Prefabricated architectural one-component....... 0.420 3.5 0.280 2.3 Pretreatment.................................... 0.340 2.8 0.420 3.5 Repair coating.................................. 0.420 3.5 0.360 3.0 Silicone release................................ 0.340 2.8 0.420 3.5 Solar absorbent................................. 0.420 3.5 0.360 3.0 Touch up coating................................ 0.420 3.5 0.360 3.0 Vacuum-metalizing............................... 0.340 2.8 0.420 3.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. Proposed Action EPA is proposing to approve the State of Maryland's SIP revision submitted on July 28, 2014, adopting the requirements of EPA's CTGs for the coating of metal furniture and miscellaneous metal parts, as RACT for these source categories. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this document. These comments will be considered before taking final action. [[Page 42462]] IV. Incorporation by Reference In this proposed rulemaking action, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule, regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the MDE rules regarding control of VOC emissions from metal furniture and miscellaneous metal parts coatings as described as section II of this proposed action. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available electronically through www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information). V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4); does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this proposed rule, pertaining to Maryland's adoption of CTG recommendations for metal furniture and miscellaneous metal parts coatings does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: July 7, 2015. William C. Early, Acting, Regional Administrator, Region III. [FR Doc. 2015-17470 Filed 7-16-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules 42459
date of final approval. EPA will notify provided that they meet the criteria of Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
the State by letter that this action has the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this Particulate matter, Sulfur Oxides,
occurred. At that time, this commitment proposed action merely approves state Reporting and recordkeeping
will no longer be a part of the approved law as meeting Federal requirements requirements.
New Hampshire SIP. EPA subsequently and does not impose additional Dated: July 1, 2015.
will publish a document in the Federal requirements beyond those imposed by H. Curtis Spalding,
Register notifying the public that the state law. For that reason, this proposed
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
conditional approval automatically action:
converted to a disapproval. If the State • Is not a significant regulatory action [FR Doc. 2015–17475 Filed 7–16–15; 8:45 am]
meets its commitment, within the subject to review by the Office of BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
applicable time frame, the conditionally Management and Budget under
approved submission will remain a part Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
of the SIP until EPA takes final action October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
approving or disapproving the new January 21, 2011); AGENCY
submittal. If EPA disapproves the new • Does not impose an information
40 CFR Part 52
submittal, the conditionally approved collection burden under the provisions
infrastructure SIP elements will also be of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 [EPA–R03–OAR–2015–0404; FRL–9930–61–
disapproved at that time. In addition, a U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Region 3]
final disapproval would trigger the • Is certified as not having a
Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) significant economic impact on a Approval and Promulgation of Air
requirement under section 110(c). If substantial number of small entities Quality Implementation Plans;
EPA approves the new submittal, the under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 Maryland; Adoption of Control
PSD program and relevant infrastructure U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Techniques Guidelines for Metal
SIP elements will be fully approved and • Does not contain any unfunded Furniture Coatings and Miscellaneous
replace the conditionally approved mandate or significantly or uniquely Metal Parts Coatings
program in the SIP. affect small governments, as described AGENCY: Environmental Protection
EPA is soliciting public comments on in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Agency (EPA).
the issues discussed in this proposal or of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
ACTION: Proposed rule.
on other relevant matters. These • Does not have Federalism
comments will be considered before implications as specified in Executive SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
EPA takes final action. Interested parties Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
may participate in the Federal 1999); State Implementation Plan (SIP)
rulemaking procedure by submitting • Is not an economically significant revision submitted by the State of
written comments to the EPA New regulatory action based on health or Maryland (Maryland). This revision
England Regional Office listed in the safety risks subject to Executive Order includes amendments to Maryland’s
ADDRESSES section of this Federal 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); regulation for the control of volatile
Register, or by submitting comments • Is not a significant regulatory action organic compounds (VOC) and meets
electronically, by mail, or through hand subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR the requirement to adopt reasonably
delivery/courier following the 28355, May 22, 2001); available control technology (RACT) for
directions in the ADDRESSES section of • Is not subject to requirements of sources covered by EPA’s Control
this Federal Register. Section 12(d) of the National Techniques Guidelines (CTG) standards
Technology Transfer and Advancement for coatings for metal furniture and
VI. Incorporation by Reference Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because miscellaneous metal parts. These
In this rulemaking, the EPA is application of those requirements would amendments will reduce emissions of
proposing to include in a final EPA rule be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; VOC from these source categories and
regulatory text that includes and help Maryland attain and maintain the
incorporation by reference. In • Does not provide EPA with the
national ambient air quality standard
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR discretionary authority to address, as
(NAAQS) for ozone. This action is being
51.5, the EPA is proposing to appropriate, disproportionate human
taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
incorporate by reference into the New health or environmental effects, using
Hampshire SIP the statutes identified practicable and legally permissible DATES: Written comments must be
within Table 1 of this proposal. The methods, under Executive Order 12898 received on or before August 17, 2015.
EPA has made, and will continue to (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
make, these documents generally In addition, the SIP is not approved identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
available electronically through to apply on any Indian reservation land R03–OAR–2015–0404 by one of the
www.regulations.gov and/or in hard or in any other area where EPA or an following methods:
copy at the appropriate EPA office (see Indian tribe has demonstrated that a A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of on-line instructions for submitting
for more information). Indian country, the rule does not have comments.
tribal implications and will not impose B. Email: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2015–0404,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
substantial direct costs on tribal
Reviews Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director,
governments or preempt tribal law as
Under the CAA, the Administrator is specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 Office of Air Program Planning,
required to approve a SIP submission FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Mailcode 3AP30, U.S. Environmental
that complies with the provisions of the Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Act and applicable Federal regulations. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Environmental protection, Air 19103.
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, pollution control, Incorporation by D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-
EPA’s role is to approve state choices, reference, Intergovernmental relations, listed EPA Region III address. Such
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:50 Jul 16, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\17JYP1.SGM 17JYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_42596/page/1.svg)
![42462 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules
IV. Incorporation by Reference Technology Transfer and Advancement • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
In this proposed rulemaking action, Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
the EPA is proposing to include in a application of those requirements would instructions for submitting comments.
final EPA rule, regulatory text that be inconsistent with the CAA; and Do not submit electronically any
• does not provide EPA with the information you consider to be
includes incorporation by reference. In
discretionary authority to address, as Confidential Business Information (CBI)
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
appropriate, disproportionate human or other information whose disclosure is
51.5, the EPA is proposing to
health or environmental effects, using restricted by statute.
incorporate by reference the MDE rules
regarding control of VOC emissions
practicable and legally permissible • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
methods, under Executive Order 12898 Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
from metal furniture and miscellaneous
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
metal parts coatings as described as
In addition, this proposed rule, NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
section II of this proposed action. The
EPA has made, and will continue to
pertaining to Maryland’s adoption of • Hand Delivery: To make special
CTG recommendations for metal arrangements for hand delivery or
make, these documents generally
furniture and miscellaneous metal parts delivery of boxed information, please
available electronically through
coatings does not have tribal follow the instructions at http://
www.regulations.gov and/or in hard
implications as specified by Executive www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
copy at the appropriate EPA office (see
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, Additional instructions on
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble
2000), because the SIP is not approved commenting or visiting the docket,
for more information).
to apply in Indian country located in the along with more information about
V. Statutory and Executive Order state, and EPA notes that it will not dockets generally, is available at
Reviews impose substantial direct costs on tribal http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
Under the CAA, the Administrator is governments or preempt tribal law.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
required to approve a SIP submission List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Susan Lewis, Director, Registration
that complies with the provisions of the Environmental protection, Air Division (RD) (7505P), main telephone
CAA and applicable Federal regulations. pollution control, Incorporation by number: (703) 305–7090; email address:
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). reference, Ozone, Reporting and RDFRNotices@epa.gov, Robert McNally,
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, recordkeeping requirements, Volatile Director, Biopesticide and Pollution
EPA’s role is to approve state choices, organic compounds. Prevention Division (BPPD), main
provided that they meet the criteria of telephone number: (703) 305–7090;
the CAA. Accordingly, this action Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. email address: BPPDFRNotices@
merely approves state law as meeting Dated: July 7, 2015. epa.gov. The mailing address for each
Federal requirements and does not William C. Early, contact person is: Office of Pesticide
impose additional requirements beyond Acting, Regional Administrator, Region III. Programs, Environmental Protection
those imposed by state law. For that [FR Doc. 2015–17470 Filed 7–16–15; 8:45 am] Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
reason, this proposed action: BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Washington, DC 20460–0001. As part of
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory the mailing address, include the contact
action’’ subject to review by the Office person’s name, division, and mail code.
of Management and Budget under ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION The division to contact is listed at the
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, AGENCY end of each pesticide petition summary.
October 4, 1993); SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
• does not impose an information 40 CFR Part 174
collection burden under the provisions I. General Information
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0032; FRL–9929–13]
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 A. Does this Action apply to me?
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions
• is certified as not having a Filed for Residues of Pesticide
You may be potentially affected by
significant economic impact on a this action if you are an agricultural
Chemicals in or on Various
substantial number of small entities producer, food manufacturer, or
Commodities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 pesticide manufacturer. The following
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); AGENCY: Environmental Protection list of North American Industrial
• does not contain any unfunded Agency (EPA). Classification System (NAICS) codes is
mandate or significantly or uniquely ACTION: Notice of filing of petitions and not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
affect small governments, as described request for comment. provides a guide to help readers
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act determine whether this document
of 1995 (Public Law 104–4); SUMMARY: This document announces the applies to them. Potentially affected
• does not have Federalism Agency’s receipt of several initial filings entities may include:
implications as specified in Executive of pesticide petitions requesting the • Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, establishment or modification of • Animal production (NAICS code
1999); regulations for residues of pesticide 112).
• is not an economically significant chemicals in or on various commodities. • Food manufacturing (NAICS code
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
regulatory action based on health or DATES: Comments must be received on 311).
safety risks subject to Executive Order or before August 17, 2015. • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, code 32532).
• is not a significant regulatory action identified by docket identification (ID) If you have any questions regarding
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR number and the pesticide petition the applicability of this action to a
28355, May 22, 2001); number (PP) of interest as shown in the particular entity, consult the person
• is not subject to requirements of body of this document, by one of the listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
Section 12(d) of the National following methods: CONTACT for the division listed at the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:50 Jul 16, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\17JYP1.SGM 17JYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_42596/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-23 09:21:19
Document Modified: 2018-02-23 09:21:19
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Written comments must be received on or before August 17, 2015. | |
| Contact | Ellen Schmitt, (215) 814-5787, or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 42459 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Ozone; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR