80_FR_42861 80 FR 42723 - Regulatory Hearing Before the Food and Drug Administration; Technical Amendment

80 FR 42723 - Regulatory Hearing Before the Food and Drug Administration; Technical Amendment

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration

Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 138 (July 20, 2015)

Page Range42723-42723
FR Document2015-17714

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is updating an authority citation for the Code of Federal Regulations. This action is technical in nature and is intended to provide accuracy of the Agency's regulations.

Federal Register, Volume 80 Issue 138 (Monday, July 20, 2015)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 138 (Monday, July 20, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 42723]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17714]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 16

[Docket No. FDA-2015-N-0011]


Regulatory Hearing Before the Food and Drug Administration; 
Technical Amendment

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is updating an 
authority citation for the Code of Federal Regulations. This action is 
technical in nature and is intended to provide accuracy of the Agency's 
regulations.

DATES: This rule is effective July 20, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary E. Kennelly, Office of Regulatory 
Affairs, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 
32, Rm. 4338, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-402-9577, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a previous rulemaking, the authority 
citation for 21 CFR part 16 was inadvertently altered to omit 28 U.S.C. 
2112 and changed 21 U.S.C. 467f to 21 U.S.C. 467F. FDA is reversing 
those changes such that 28 U.S.C. 2112 and 21 U.S.C. 467f are included 
in the list of authority citations for 21 CFR part 16.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part16

    Administrative practice and procedure.

    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 
16 is amended as follows:

PART 16--REGULATORY HEARING BEFORE THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION

0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 16 is revised to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1451-1461; 21 U.S.C. 141-149, 321-394, 
467f, 679, 821, 1034; 28 U.S.C. 2112; 42 U.S.C. 201-262, 263b, 364.

    Dated: July 15, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-17714 Filed 7-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P



                                                                     Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 138 / Monday, July 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations                                         42723

                                                  By direction of the Commission,                         DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND                              POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
                                                Commissioner Ohlhausen dissenting.                        HUMAN SERVICES
                                                Donald S. Clark,                                                                                                39 CFR Part 3020
                                                Secretary.                                                Food and Drug Administration                          [Docket Nos. MC2010–21 and CP2010–36]
                                                  Note: The following dissent will not appear             21 CFR Part 16
                                                in the Code of Federal Regulations.                                                                             Update to Product Lists
                                                                                                          [Docket No. FDA–2015–N–0011]                          AGENCY:    Postal Regulatory Commission.
                                                Dissenting Statement of Commissioner                                                                            ACTION:   Final rule.
                                                Maureen K. Ohlhausen                                      Regulatory Hearing Before the Food
                                                                                                          and Drug Administration; Technical                    SUMMARY:   The Commission is updating
                                                   I voted against the Commission’s
                                                                                                          Amendment                                             the product lists. This action reflects a
                                                Final Revised Interpretations of the
                                                Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (MMWA)                         AGENCY:    Food and Drug Administration,              publication policy adopted by
                                                Rule because it retains Rule 703.5(j)’s                   HHS.                                                  Commission order. The referenced
                                                prohibition on pre-dispute mandatory                                                                            policy assumes periodic updates. The
                                                                                                                Final rule; technical
                                                                                                          ACTION:
                                                                                                                                                                updates are identified in the body of
                                                binding arbitration.1                                     amendment.
                                                   Since the last Rule review in 1997,                                                                          this document. The product lists, which
                                                two federal appellate courts have held                    SUMMARY:   The Food and Drug                          is re-published in its entirety, includes
                                                that the MMWA does not prohibit                           Administration (FDA) is updating an                   these updates.
                                                binding arbitration.2 Noting the federal                  authority citation for the Code of                    DATES: Effective date: July 20, 2015.
                                                policy favoring arbitration expressed in                  Federal Regulations. This action is                      Applicability dates: March 31, 2015,
                                                the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA),3                       technical in nature and is intended to                Parcel Return Service Contract 6
                                                these courts concluded that the                           provide accuracy of the Agency’s                      (MC2015–41 and CP2015–53); April 8,
                                                MMWA’s statutory language and                             regulations.                                          2015, Priority Mail Contract 121
                                                legislative history did not overcome the                                                                        (MC2015–43 and CP2015–54); April 8,
                                                                                                          DATES:   This rule is effective July 20,              2015, Parcel Select Contract 9 (MC2015–
                                                presumption in favor of arbitration and                   2015.
                                                that the purposes of the MMWA and the                                                                           44 and CP2015–55); April 8, 2015,
                                                FAA were not in inherent conflict. The                    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                      Priority Mail & First-Class Package
                                                courts also declined to give the                          Mary E. Kennelly, Office of Regulatory                Service Contract 3 (MC2015–45 and
                                                Commission’s contrary interpretation                      Affairs, Food and Drug Administration,                CP2015–56); April 21, 2015, Priority
                                                Chevron deference.4 Although some                         10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32,                   Mail Express & Priority Mail Contract 17
                                                lower courts have reached a different                     Rm. 4338, Silver Spring, MD 20993–                    (MC2015–47 and CP2015–58); April 21,
                                                conclusion, there is no circuit court                     0002, 240–402–9577,                                   2015, Priority Mail Contract 122
                                                precedent upholding the Commission’s                      FDASIAImplementationORA@                              (MC2015–46 and CP2015–57); May 1,
                                                interpretation of the MMWA in Rule                        fda.hhs.gov.                                          2015, Priority Mail & First-Class Package
                                                703.5(j). Additionally, in several recent                                                                       Service Contract 4 (MC2015–48 and
                                                                                                          SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:    In a                    CP2015–60); May 12, 2015, Priority Mail
                                                cases, the Supreme Court has indicated                    previous rulemaking, the authority
                                                a strong preference for arbitration.5                                                                           Express & Priority Mail Contract 18
                                                                                                          citation for 21 CFR part 16 was                       (MC2015–49 and CP2015–61); May 27,
                                                   The courts have sent a clear signal                    inadvertently altered to omit 28 U.S.C.
                                                that the Commission’s position that                                                                             2015, Global Expedited Package
                                                                                                          2112 and changed 21 U.S.C. 467f to 21                 Services Contracts Non-Published Rates
                                                MMWA prohibits binding arbitration is                     U.S.C. 467F. FDA is reversing those
                                                no longer supportable.6 When faced                                                                              6 (MC2015–23 and CP2015–65); May 28,
                                                                                                          changes such that 28 U.S.C. 2112 and 21               2015, Parcel Return Service Contract 7
                                                with such a signal, the Commission                        U.S.C. 467f are included in the list of
                                                should not reaffirm the rule in question.                                                                       (MC2015–50 and CP2015–72); May 28,
                                                                                                          authority citations for 21 CFR part 16.               2015, Parcel Return Service Contract 8
                                                I therefore respectfully dissent.
                                                [FR Doc. 2015–14065 Filed 7–17–15; 8:45 am]               List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part16                     (MC2015–51 and CP2015–73); June 9,
                                                                                                                                                                2015, Priority Mail Contract 124
                                                BILLING CODE 6750–01–P                                      Administrative practice and                         (MC2015–53 and CP2015–81); June 9,
                                                                                                          procedure.                                            2015, Priority Mail Contract 123
                                                  1 I do not object to the other final actions taken
                                                                                                            Therefore, under the Federal Food,                  (MC2015–52 and CP2015–80); June 16,
                                                in this review.
                                                  2 See Walton v. Rose Mobile Homes, LLC, 298             Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under                      2015, Priority Mail Contract 125
                                                F.3d 470 (5th Cir. 2002); Davis v. Southern Energy        authority delegated to the Commissioner               (MC2015–54 and CP2015–82).
                                                Homes, Inc., 305 F.3d 1268 (11th Cir. 2002).              of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 16 is                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                  3 9 U.S.C. 1. See Shearson/Am. Express Inc. v.
                                                                                                          amended as follows:                                   David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
                                                McMahon, 482 U.S. 220 (1987) (noting that the
                                                presumption of the FAA is that arbitration is             PART 16—REGULATORY HEARING                            202–789–6800.
                                                preferable and Congress must clearly override that                                                              SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
                                                presumption if it is to be disregarded).                  BEFORE THE FOOD AND DRUG
                                                  4 Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources             ADMINISTRATION                                        document identifies updates to the
                                                Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984) (holding                                                             product lists, which appear as 39 CFR
                                                that courts defer to an agency’s interpretation of a      ■ 1. The authority citation for 21 CFR                Appendix A to Subpart A of Part 3020—
                                                statute if ‘‘(1) Congress has not spoken directly to      part 16 is revised to read as follows:                Mail Classification Schedule.
                                                the issue; and (2) the agency’s interpretation ‘is                                                              Publication of the updated product lists
                                                based on a permissible construction of the                  Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1451–1461; 21 U.S.C.
                                                                                                          141–149, 321–394, 467f, 679, 821, 1034; 28            in the Federal Register is addressed in
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                statute’ ’’).
                                                  5 See, e.g,. Am. Express Co. v. Italian Colors Rest.,   U.S.C. 2112; 42 U.S.C. 201–262, 263b, 364.            the Postal Accountability and
                                                133 S. Ct. 2304 (2013), AT&T Mobility LLC v.                                                                    Enhancement Act (PAEA) of 2006.
                                                Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740 (2011).                         Dated: July 15, 2015.                                  Authorization. The Commission
                                                  6 See Davis, 305 F.3d at 1280 (‘‘[T]he FTC’s            Leslie Kux,                                           process for periodic publication of
                                                interpretation of the MMWA is unreasonable, and           Associate Commissioner for Policy.
                                                we decline to defer to the FTC regulations of the
                                                                                                                                                                updates was established in Docket Nos.
                                                MMWA regarding binding arbitration in written             [FR Doc. 2015–17714 Filed 7–17–15; 8:45 am]           MC2010–21 and CP2010–36, Order No.
                                                warranties.’’).                                           BILLING CODE 4164–01–P                                445, April 22, 2010, at 8.


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014    16:02 Jul 17, 2015   Jkt 235001   PO 00000   Frm 00017   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM   20JYR1



Document Created: 2015-12-15 12:58:28
Document Modified: 2015-12-15 12:58:28
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal rule; technical amendment.
DatesThis rule is effective July 20, 2015.
ContactMary E. Kennelly, Office of Regulatory Affairs, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, Rm. 4338, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-402-9577, [email protected]
FR Citation80 FR 42723 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR