80 FR 43921 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 142 (July 24, 2015)
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Register Volume 80, Issue 142 (July 24, 2015)
| Page Range | 43921-43925 | |
| FR Document | 2015-17977 |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 2015)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 43921-43925] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2015-17977] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2014-0572; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-027-AD; Amendment 39-18214; AD 2015-15-05] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 98-22-10 for certain The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -200C, and -300 series airplanes. AD 98-22-10 required repetitive inspections for cracking of the aft frame and frame support structure of the forward service doorway, and repair if necessary. AD 98-22-10 also provided an optional terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirements of that AD. This new AD requires new inspections and adds airplanes to the applicability; for certain airplanes, this new AD provides an optional preventive modification, which terminates the repetitive inspections. This AD was prompted by reports of fatigue cracking of the aft frame and frame support structure of the forward service doorway around the six doorstop fittings, and a determination that inspections are needed in additional locations and that additional airplanes might be subject to the identified unsafe condition. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the aft frame and frame support structure of the forward service doorway around the six [[Page 43922]] doorstop fittings, which could result in door deflection and loss of pressurization. DATES: This AD is effective August 28, 2015. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of August 28, 2015. ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; phone: 206-544-5000, extension 1; fax: 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-0572. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014- 0572; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647- 5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nenita Odesa, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5234; fax: 562-627-5210; email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to supersede AD 98-22-10, Amendment 39-10858 (63 FR 57240, October 27, 1998). AD 98-22-10 applied to certain The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -200C, and -300 series airplanes. The NPRM was published in the Federal Register on August 26, 2014 (79 FR 50867). The NPRM was prompted by reports of cracking in the surround structure of the forward galley service doorway between body station (STA) 332.1 and STA 344, which are outside the inspection area of AD 98-22-10, and by reports that cracking has been discovered on airplanes outside the applicability of AD 98-22-10. We have determined that inspections are needed in additional locations, and that additional airplanes are subject to the identified unsafe condition. The NPRM (79 FR 50867, August 26, 2014) proposed to continue to require repetitive inspections for cracking of the aft frame and frame support structure of the forward service doorway, and repair if necessary. The NPRM also proposed to add inspections, add airplanes to the applicability, and for certain airplanes, provide an optional preventive modification, which would terminate the repetitive inspections. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the aft frame and frame support structure of the forward service doorway around the six doorstop fittings, which could result in door deflection and loss of pressurization. Comments We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM (79 FR 50867, August 26, 2014) and the FAA's response to each comment. Request To Clarify Wording in NPRM (79 FR 50867, August 6, 2014) Boeing stated paragraph 1.E, ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014, provides actions for airplanes repaired or modified previously where the preventive modifications have been accomplished. Boeing stated that paragraph (l)(4) of the proposed AD reads: ``AMOCs approved for AD 98-22-10, Amendment 39-10858 (63 FR 57240, October 27, 1998), are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of this AD.'' Boeing interpreted the latter statement to mean that AMOCs approved for AD 98-22-10 do not supersede (or negate) the additional inspection requirements provided in Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014, and requested concurrence with its interpretation of this language. We agree with Boeing's interpretation. Paragraph (m)(4) of this AD (paragraph (l)(4) of the proposed AD) establishes that an AMOC issued for actions performed in accordance with AD 98-22-10, Amendment 39- 10858 (63 FR 57240, October 27, 1998), satisfies the corresponding provisions, and only those corresponding provisions, of the this AD. All requirements of this AD must be satisfied, whether by previous AMOC, accomplishment of the specified AD actions, or a new AMOC. We have not changed this AD in this regard. Request To Clarify Actions That Are Not Required Southwest Airlines (Southwest) noted that paragraph (h) of the proposed AD (79 FR 50867, August 26, 2014) would provide terminating action for the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD. Southwest requested that we revise the NPRM to state that the post preventive modification inspections specified in tables 9, 10, 11, and 12 in paragraph 1.E, ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014, would not be required. Southwest also requested that this provision apply to paragraph (k) of the proposed AD (paragraph (l) of this AD), which specifies credit for actions done previously using Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737- 53A1108, Revision 6, dated January 9, 2014. We agree with the requests. While the post-preventive modification inspections specified by tables 9 through 12 in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014, may be used in support of compliance with section 121.1109(c)(2) or 129.109(b)(2) of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 121.1109(c)(2) or 14 CFR 129.109(b)(2)), those actions are not required by this AD. We have revised paragraph (g) of this AD by specifying the required parts of the service information: Parts 2 and 4. We have also added new paragraph (j) in this final rule to specify that post-preventive modification inspections (Part 6) are not required by this AD. We have redesignated subsequent paragraphs of this AD accordingly. Effect of Winglets on This AD Aviation Partners Boeing stated that accomplishing the supplemental type certificate (STC) ST01219SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/ Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/ ebd1cec7b301293e86257cb30045557a/$FILE/ST01219SE.pdf) does not affect accomplishment of the actions specified in the NPRM (79 FR 50867, August 26, 2014). We concur with the commenter. We have redesignated paragraph (c) of the proposed AD (79 FR 50867, August 26, 2014) as (c)(1) and added new paragraph (c)(2) to this AD to state that installation of STC ST01219SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/ [[Page 43923]] Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/ ebd1cec7b301293e86257cb30045557a/$FILE/ST01219SE.pdf) does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by this final rule. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST01219SE is installed, a ``change in product''' alternative method of compliance (AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 39.17. Explanation of Additional Changes Made to This AD We have updated the Costs of Compliance section to add existing inspection and repair costs from AD 98-22-10, Amendment 39-10858 (63 FR 57240, October 27, 1998). We have changed paragraph (b) of this AD to add AD 90-06-02, Amendment 39-6489, (55 FR 8372, March 7, 1990), as an affected AD since accomplishment of the preventative modification required by paragraph (h) of this AD is an alternative method of compliance for paragraph A. of AD 90-06-02. In various locations, Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014, cites Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 6, dated January 9, 2014, instead of Revision 7 of the service information. We have added a new paragraph (k)(3) in this AD to clarify that, where Revision 7 of the service information specifies accomplishment of a preventative modification be done using Revision 6 of the service information, this AD requires accomplishment of that preventative modification with Revision 7 of this service information. We also noted a discrepancy in table 4 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014. Although the fourth action is an inspection of the intercostals ``and attaching stringers,'' the corresponding corrective action specified in table 4 is for only a crack in ``an intercostal.'' We have confirmed with Boeing that the ``attaching stringers'' were inadvertently omitted from this condition in table 4. Repair of a cracked attaching stringer, however, is described in PART 4, paragraph 7, of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014. We have added a new paragraph (k)(4) in this AD to specify that cracking in the attaching stringers also requires repair. Conclusion We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 50867, August 26, 2014) for correcting the unsafe condition; and Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 50867, August 26, 2014). We also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD. Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014. The service information describes procedures for inspections for cracking of the aft frame and frame support structure of the forward service doorway, and repair if necessary. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section of this AD. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this AD affects 419 airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD: Estimated Costs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cost on U.S. Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Inspection [retained actions 7 work-hours x $85 $0................ $595 per $249,305 per from AD 98-22-10, Amendment 39- per hour = $595 inspection cycle. inspection cycle. 10858 (63 FR 57240, October 27, per inspection 1998)]. cycle. Inspection [new AD action]...... 28 work-hours x None.............. $2,380 per $997,220 per $85 per hour = inspection cycle. inspection cycle. $2,380 per inspection cycle. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Estimated Costs for On-Condition Actions ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cost per Action Labor cost Parts cost product ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Repair [retained actions from AD 98-22-10, 42 work-hours x $85 per hour = $913 $4,483 Amendment 39-10858 (63 FR 57240, October 27, $3,570. 1998)]. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Estimated Costs for Optional Modification ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Repair/preventive modification [new Between 12 and 17 work- Between $90 and $913... Between $1,110 and AD action]. hours x $85 per hour = $2,358. between $1,020 and $1,445. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with [[Page 43924]] promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings We have determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 0 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Sec. 39.13 [Amended] 0 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 98-22-10, Amendment 39-10858 (63 FR 57240, October 27, 1998), and adding the following new AD: 2015-15-05 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18214; Docket No. FAA- 2014-0572; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-027-AD. (a) Effective Date This AD is effective August 28, 2015. (b) Affected ADs (1) This AD replaces AD 98-22-10, Amendment 39-10858 (63 FR 57240, October 27, 1998). (2) This AD affects AD 90-06-02, Amendment 39-6489 (55 FR 8372, March 7, 1990). (c) Applicability (1) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, - 200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737- 53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014. (2) Installation of Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) ST01219SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/ rgstc.nsf/0/ebd1cec7b301293e86257cb30045557a/$FILE/ST01219SE.pdf) does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST01219SE is installed, a ``change in product'' alternative method of compliance (AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 39.17. (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage. (e) Unsafe Condition This AD was prompted by reports of fatigue cracking of the aft frame and frame support structure of the forward service doorway around the six doorstop fittings, and a determination that inspections are needed in additional locations and that additional airplanes might be subject to the identified unsafe condition. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the aft frame and frame support structure of the forward service doorway around the six doorstop fittings, which could result in door deflection and loss of pressurization. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. (g) Inspections and Corrective Actions At the applicable times specified in tables 1 through 6 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014, except as required by paragraph (k)(1) of this AD: Do detailed inspections of the frame web between body station (STA) 332.1 and STA 344, intercostal T- brackets, intercostal T-chords, intercostals, and stringers, as applicable; do high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections for cracking of door stop intercostal T-brackets, intercostal web, door stop intercostal T-chords, intercostals, and stringers, as applicable; and do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions; in accordance with Parts 2 and 4 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737- 53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014, except as required by paragraphs (k)(2) through (k)(4) of this AD. Do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions before further flight. Repeat the inspections at the applicable times specified in tables 1 through 6 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014, until the terminating action specified in paragraph (h) of this AD is done. (h) Optional Terminating Action For Group 1, Configuration 1; Group 1, Configuration 2; Group 2; Group 3; Group 4, Configuration 1; and Group 4, Configuration 2 airplanes identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014: Accomplishment of a preventive modification in accordance with Part 5 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014, terminates the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD. (i) Inspections and Corrective Actions for Group 5 Airplanes For Group 5 airplanes identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014: Within 120 days after the effective date of this AD, inspect and repair any cracking using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (m) of this AD. Repair any cracking, before further flight. (j) Post Preventive Modification Inspections Not Required The post preventive modification inspections specified in tables 9 through 12 in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 6, dated January 9, 2014; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014; are not required by this AD. Note 1 to paragraph (j) of this AD: Tables 9 through 12 in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 6, dated January 9, 2014; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014; specify that post preventive modification inspections may be used in support of compliance with section 121.1109(c)(2) or 129.109(b)(2) of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 121.1109(c)(2) or 14 CFR 129.109(b)(2)). The corresponding actions specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737- 53A1108, Revision 6, dated January 9, 2014; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014; are not required by this AD. (k) Exceptions to the Service Information (1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014, specifies a compliance time ``after the issue date of Revision 6 of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance within the specified time after the effective date of this AD. (2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014, specifies to contact Boeing for repair instructions: Before further flight, repair the cracking using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (m) of this AD. [[Page 43925]] (3) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014, specifies accomplishment of a preventative modification in accordance with ``Revision 6 of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires accomplishment of those actions to be done in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014. (4) Where table 4 in paragraph 1.E, ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014, specifies repairing a condition identified as any crack found in ``an intercostal,'' this AD requires repairing a condition identified as any crack found in ``an intercostal or attaching stringers.'' (l) Credit for Previous Actions This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD using Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 6, dated January 9, 2014. This service information is not incorporated by reference in this AD. (m) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (n)(1) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected]. (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD. (4) AMOCs approved previously for AD 98-22-10, Amendment 39- 10858 (63 FR 57240, October 27, 1998), are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of this AD. (5) Accomplishment of the preventive modification in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014, as required by paragraph (h) of this AD, is an AMOC for the structural modification specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108 that is required by paragraph A. of AD 90-06- 02, Amendment 39-6489, (55 FR 8372, March 7, 1990), for the airplanes identified in paragraph (h) of this AD. (n) Related Information (1) For more information about this AD, contact Nenita Odesa, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles ACO, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627- 5234; fax: 562-627-5210; email: [email protected]. (2) Service information identified in this AD that is not incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in paragraph (o)(3) of this AD. (o) Material Incorporated by Reference (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. (i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014. (ii) Reserved. (3) For Boeing service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; phone: 206-544-5000, extension 1; fax: 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html. Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 10, 2015. Jeffrey E. Duven, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2015-17977 Filed 7-23-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 43921
specific to a consumer, and Procedures Act, respectively. The and Closing Disclosure under
§ 1026.19(e)(2)(iii), which prohibits requirement to provide the special §§ 1026.37 and 1026.38, for applications
creditors from requiring the submission information booklet under § 1026.19(g) that are received on or after October 3,
of documents verifying information of the TILA–RESPA Final Rule would 2015, a creditor may change the title
related to the consumer’s application. also not apply to the transaction. But the appearing on the cover of the version of
Accordingly, the provisions under creditor would provide the special the special information booklet in use
§ 1026.19(e)(2) are effective on October information booklet under § 1024.6, as before October 3, 2015, provided the
3, 2015, without respect to whether an applicable. words ‘‘settlement costs’’ are used in the
application has been received on that ii. Predisclosure written estimates. title. See comment 1(d)(5)–1 for
date. In addition, the amendments to Assume a creditor receives a request guidance regarding compliance with
§ 1026.28 and the commentary to from a consumer for a written estimate § 1026.19(g) for applications received on
§ 1026.29 govern the preemption of of terms or costs specific to the or after October 3, 2015.
State laws and thus, the amendments to consumer on October 3, 2015, before the * * * * *
those provisions and associated consumer submits an application to the
Dated: July 20, 2015.
commentary made by the TILA–RESPA creditor, and thus before the consumer
has received the disclosures required Richard Cordray,
Final Rule are effective on October 3,
2015, without respect to whether an under § 1026.19(e)(1)(i). The creditor, if Director, Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection.
application has been received on that it provides such written estimate to the
consumer, must comply with the [FR Doc. 2015–18239 Filed 7–22–15; 11:15 am]
date. The following examples illustrate
the application of the effective date for requirements of § 1026.19(e)(2)(ii) and BILLING CODE 4810–AM–P
the TILA–RESPA Final Rule. provide the required statement on the
i. General. Assume a creditor receives written estimate, even though the
an application, as defined under creditor has not received an application DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
§ 1026.2(a)(3) of the TILA–RESPA Final for a transaction subject to § 1026.19(e)
and (f) on that date. Federal Aviation Administration
Rule, for a transaction subject to
§ 1026.19(e) and (f) on October 3, 2015, iii. Request for preemption
determination. Assume a creditor 14 CFR Part 39
and that consummation of the
transaction occurs on October 31, 2015. submits a request to the Bureau under [Docket No. FAA–2014–0572; Directorate
The amendments of the TILA–RESPA § 1026.28(a)(1) for a determination of Identifier 2014–NM–027–AD; Amendment
whether a State law is inconsistent with 39–18214; AD 2015–15–05]
Final Rule, including the requirements
to provide the Loan Estimate and the disclosure requirements of the RIN 2120–AA64
Closing Disclosure under § 1026.19(e) TILA–RESPA Final Rule on October 3,
and (f), apply to the transaction. The 2015. Because the amendments to Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
creditor would also be required to § 1026.28(a)(1) are effective on that date Company Airplanes
provide the special information booklet and do not depend on whether the
creditor has received an application as AGENCY: Federal Aviation
under § 1026.19(g) of the TILA–RESPA Administration (FAA), DOT.
Final Rule, as applicable. Assume a defined under § 1026.2(a)(3) of the
TILA–RESPA Final Rule, ACTION: Final rule.
creditor receives an application, as
defined under § 1026.2(a)(3) of the § 1026.28(a)(1), as amended by the SUMMARY: We are superseding
TILA–RESPA Final Rule, for a TILA–RESPA Final Rule, is applicable Airworthiness Directive (AD) 98–22–10
transaction subject to § 1026.19(e) and to the request on that date and the for certain The Boeing Company Model
(f) on September 30, 2015, and that Bureau would make a determination 737–100, –200, –200C, and –300 series
consummation of the transaction occurs based on the amendments of the TILA– airplanes. AD 98–22–10 required
on October 30, 2015. The amendments RESPA Final Rule, including, for repetitive inspections for cracking of the
of the TILA–RESPA Final Rule, example, the requirements of § 1026.37. aft frame and frame support structure of
including the requirements to provide Subpart C—Closed End Credit the forward service doorway, and repair
the Loan Estimate and Closing if necessary. AD 98–22–10 also
Disclosure under § 1026.19(e) and (f), do * * * * * provided an optional terminating action
not apply to the transaction, except that for the repetitive inspection
Section 1026.19—Certain Mortgage and
the provisions of § 1026.19(e)(2), requirements of that AD. This new AD
Variable-Rate Transactions
specifically § 1026.19(e)(2)(i), (e)(2)(ii), requires new inspections and adds
and (e)(2)(iii), do apply to the * * * * * airplanes to the applicability; for certain
transaction beginning on October 3, 19(g)(2) Permissible changes. airplanes, this new AD provides an
2015, because they become effective on * * * * * optional preventive modification, which
October 3, 2015, without respect to 3. Permissible changes to title of terminates the repetitive inspections.
whether an application, as defined booklets in use before October 3, 2015. This AD was prompted by reports of
under § 1026.2(a)(3) of the TILA–RESPA Section 1026.19(g)(2)(iv) provides that fatigue cracking of the aft frame and
Final Rule, has been received by the the title appearing on the cover of the frame support structure of the forward
creditor or mortgage broker on that date. booklet shall not be changed. Comment service doorway around the six
The creditor does not provide the 19(g)(1)–1 states that the Bureau may, doorstop fittings, and a determination
Closing Disclosure so that it is received from time to time, issue revised or that inspections are needed in
by the consumer at least three business alternative versions of the special additional locations and that additional
rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
days before consummation; instead, the information booklet that address airplanes might be subject to the
creditor and the settlement agent transactions subject to § 1026.19(g) by identified unsafe condition. We are
provide the disclosures under publishing a notice in the Federal issuing this AD to detect and correct
§ 1026.19(a)(2)(ii) and § 1024.8, as Register. Until the Bureau issues a fatigue cracking of the aft frame and
applicable, under the Truth in Lending version of the special information frame support structure of the forward
Act and the Real Estate Settlement booklet relating to the Loan Estimate service doorway around the six
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:07 Jul 23, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24JYR1.SGM 24JYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_44063/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 43923
Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/ Revision 7 of the service information and minor editorial changes. We have
rgstc.nsf/0/ specifies accomplishment of a determined that these minor changes:
ebd1cec7b301293e86257cb30045557a/ preventative modification be done using • Are consistent with the intent that
$FILE/ST01219SE.pdf) does not affect Revision 6 of the service information, was proposed in the NPRM (79 FR
the ability to accomplish the actions this AD requires accomplishment of that 50867, August 26, 2014) for correcting
required by this final rule. Therefore, for preventative modification with Revision the unsafe condition; and
airplanes on which STC ST01219SE is 7 of this service information. • Do not add any additional burden
installed, a ‘‘change in product’’’ We also noted a discrepancy in table upon the public than was already
alternative method of compliance 4 of paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ in proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 50867,
(AMOC) approval request is not Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737– August 26, 2014).
necessary to comply with the 53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014. We also determined that these
requirements of 14 CFR 39.17. Although the fourth action is an changes will not increase the economic
inspection of the intercostals ‘‘and burden on any operator or increase the
Explanation of Additional Changes
attaching stringers,’’ the corresponding scope of this AD.
Made to This AD
We have updated the Costs of corrective action specified in table 4 is Related Service Information Under 1
Compliance section to add existing for only a crack in ‘‘an intercostal.’’ We CFR Part 51
inspection and repair costs from AD 98– have confirmed with Boeing that the
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service
22–10, Amendment 39–10858 (63 FR ‘‘attaching stringers’’ were inadvertently
Bulletin 737–53A1108, Revision 7,
57240, October 27, 1998). omitted from this condition in table 4. dated July 7, 2014. The service
We have changed paragraph (b) of this Repair of a cracked attaching stringer, information describes procedures for
AD to add AD 90–06–02, Amendment however, is described in PART 4, inspections for cracking of the aft frame
39–6489, (55 FR 8372, March 7, 1990), paragraph 7, of the Accomplishment and frame support structure of the
as an affected AD since accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service forward service doorway, and repair if
of the preventative modification Bulletin 737–53A1108, Revision 7, necessary. This service information is
required by paragraph (h) of this AD is dated July 7, 2014. We have added a reasonably available because the
an alternative method of compliance for new paragraph (k)(4) in this AD to interested parties have access to it
paragraph A. of AD 90–06–02. specify that cracking in the attaching through their normal course of business
In various locations, Boeing Alert stringers also requires repair. or by the means identified in the
Service Bulletin 737–53A1108, Revision Conclusion ADDRESSES section of this AD.
7, dated July 7, 2014, cites Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737–53A1108, Revision We reviewed the relevant data, Costs of Compliance
6, dated January 9, 2014, instead of considered the comments received, and We estimate that this AD affects 419
Revision 7 of the service information. determined that air safety and the airplanes of U.S. registry.
We have added a new paragraph (k)(3) public interest require adopting this AD We estimate the following costs to
in this AD to clarify that, where with the changes described previously comply with this AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost on U.S. operators
product
Inspection [retained actions from AD 7 work-hours × $85 per hour = $595 $0 ........... $595 per inspection $249,305 per inspec-
98–22–10, Amendment 39–10858 per inspection cycle. cycle. tion cycle.
(63 FR 57240, October 27, 1998)].
Inspection [new AD action] ................... 28 work-hours × $85 per hour = None ...... $2,380 per inspection $997,220 per inspec-
$2,380 per inspection cycle. cycle. tion cycle.
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR ON-CONDITION ACTIONS
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
Repair [retained actions from AD 98–22–10, Amendment 42 work-hours × $85 per hour = $3,570 .......................... $913 $4,483
39–10858 (63 FR 57240, October 27, 1998)].
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR OPTIONAL MODIFICATION
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product
Repair/preventive modification [new AD ac- Between 12 and 17 work-hours × $85 per Between $90 and $913 .. Between $1,110 and
tion]. hour = between $1,020 and $1,445. $2,358.
rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Authority for This Rulemaking Section 106, describes the authority of We are issuing this rulemaking under
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Title 49 of the United States Code Aviation Programs, describes in more Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue detail the scope of the Agency’s ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, authority. section, Congress charges the FAA with
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:07 Jul 23, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24JYR1.SGM 24JYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_44063/page/3.svg)
![43924 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in (b) Affected ADs Repeat the inspections at the applicable
air commerce by prescribing regulations (1) This AD replaces AD 98–22–10, times specified in tables 1 through 6 of
for practices, methods, and procedures Amendment 39–10858 (63 FR 57240, October paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
27, 1998). Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1108,
the Administrator finds necessary for
(2) This AD affects AD 90–06–02, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014, until the
safety in air commerce. This regulation terminating action specified in paragraph (h)
is within the scope of that authority Amendment 39–6489 (55 FR 8372, March 7,
1990). of this AD is done.
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on (c) Applicability (h) Optional Terminating Action
products identified in this rulemaking (1) This AD applies to The Boeing For Group 1, Configuration 1; Group 1,
action. Company Model 737–100, –200, –200C, Configuration 2; Group 2; Group 3; Group 4,
Configuration 1; and Group 4, Configuration
–300, –400, and –500 series airplanes,
Regulatory Findings certificated in any category, as identified in
2 airplanes identified in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737–53A1108, Revision 7, dated July
We have determined that this AD will Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1108,
7, 2014: Accomplishment of a preventive
not have federalism implications under Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014.
modification in accordance with Part 5 of
(2) Installation of Supplemental Type
Executive Order 13132. This AD will Certificate (STC) ST01219SE (http://
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1108,
not have a substantial direct effect on Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014, terminates the
rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_
the States, on the relationship between repetitive inspections required by paragraph
Library/rgstc.nsf/0/
the national government and the States, (g) of this AD.
ebd1cec7b301293e86257cb30045557a/$FILE/
or on the distribution of power and ST01219SE.pdf) does not affect the ability to (i) Inspections and Corrective Actions for
responsibilities among the various accomplish the actions required by this AD. Group 5 Airplanes
levels of government. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC For Group 5 airplanes identified in Boeing
ST01219SE is installed, a ‘‘change in Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1108,
For the reasons discussed above, I product’’ alternative method of compliance
certify that this AD: Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014: Within 120
(AMOC) approval request is not necessary to days after the effective date of this AD,
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory comply with the requirements of 14 CFR inspect and repair any cracking using a
action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 39.17. method approved in accordance with the
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under (d) Subject procedures specified in paragraph (m) of this
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures AD. Repair any cracking, before further flight.
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), America Code 53, Fuselage. (j) Post Preventive Modification Inspections
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation Not Required
(e) Unsafe Condition
in Alaska, and The post preventive modification
This AD was prompted by reports of inspections specified in tables 9 through 12
(4) Will not have a significant fatigue cracking of the aft frame and frame
economic impact, positive or negative, in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
support structure of the forward service Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1108,
on a substantial number of small entities doorway around the six doorstop fittings, and Revision 6, dated January 9, 2014; and
under the criteria of the Regulatory a determination that inspections are needed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1108,
Flexibility Act. in additional locations and that additional Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014; are not
airplanes might be subject to the identified required by this AD.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 unsafe condition. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct fatigue cracking of the aft Note 1 to paragraph (j) of this AD: Tables
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation frame and frame support structure of the 9 through 12 in paragraph 1.E.,
safety, Incorporation by reference, forward service doorway around the six ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service
Safety. doorstop fittings, which could result in door Bulletin 737–53A1108, Revision 6, dated
deflection and loss of pressurization. January 9, 2014; and Boeing Alert Service
Adoption of the Amendment Bulletin 737–53A1108, Revision 7, dated July
(f) Compliance 7, 2014; specify that post preventive
Accordingly, under the authority modification inspections may be used in
delegated to me by the Administrator, Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already support of compliance with section
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as done. 121.1109(c)(2) or 129.109(b)(2) of the Federal
follows: Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 121.1109(c)(2)
(g) Inspections and Corrective Actions or 14 CFR 129.109(b)(2)). The corresponding
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS At the applicable times specified in tables actions specified in the Accomplishment
DIRECTIVES 1 through 6 of paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737– 737–53A1108, Revision 6, dated January 9,
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014, 2014; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–
continues to read as follows: except as required by paragraph (k)(1) of this 53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014; are
AD: Do detailed inspections of the frame web not required by this AD.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. between body station (STA) 332.1 and STA
344, intercostal T-brackets, intercostal T- (k) Exceptions to the Service Information
§ 39.13 [Amended]
chords, intercostals, and stringers, as (1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by applicable; do high frequency eddy current 737–53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014,
removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) (HFEC) inspections for cracking of door stop specifies a compliance time ‘‘after the issue
intercostal T-brackets, intercostal web, door date of Revision 6 of this service bulletin,’’
98–22–10, Amendment 39–10858 (63
stop intercostal T-chords, intercostals, and this AD requires compliance within the
FR 57240, October 27, 1998), and stringers, as applicable; and do all applicable specified time after the effective date of this
adding the following new AD: related investigative and corrective actions; AD.
rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
2015–15–05 The Boeing Company: in accordance with Parts 2 and 4 of the (2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
Amendment 39–18214; Docket No. FAA– Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert 737–53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014,
2014–0572; Directorate Identifier 2014– Service Bulletin 737–53A1108, Revision 7, specifies to contact Boeing for repair
NM–027–AD. dated July 7, 2014, except as required by instructions: Before further flight, repair the
paragraphs (k)(2) through (k)(4) of this AD. cracking using a method approved in
(a) Effective Date Do all applicable related investigative and accordance with the procedures specified in
This AD is effective August 28, 2015. corrective actions before further flight. paragraph (m) of this AD.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:07 Jul 23, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24JYR1.SGM 24JYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_44063/page/4.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 142 / Friday, July 24, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 43925
(3) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin (n) Related Information SUMMARY: We are superseding
737–53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014, (1) For more information about this AD, Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2012–13–
specifies accomplishment of a preventative contact Nenita Odesa, Aerospace Engineer, 06, for all Airbus Model A300 series
modification in accordance with ‘‘Revision 6 Airframe Branch, ANM–120L, FAA, Los airplanes and all Model A300 B4–600,
of this service bulletin,’’ this AD requires Angeles ACO, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, B4–600R, and F4–600R series airplanes,
accomplishment of those actions to be done Lakewood, CA 90712–4137; phone: 562–627– and Model A300 C4–605R Variant F
in accordance with Boeing Alert Service 5234; fax: 562–627–5210; email: airplanes (collectively called Model
Bulletin 737–53A1108, Revision 7, dated July nenita.odesa@faa.gov.
7, 2014. (2) Service information identified in this
A300–600 series airplanes). AD 2012–
(4) Where table 4 in paragraph 1.E, AD that is not incorporated by reference is 13–06 required a one-time detailed
‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service available at the addresses specified in inspection to determine the length of
Bulletin 737–53A1108, Revision 7, dated July paragraph (o)(3) of this AD. the fire shut-off valve (FSOV) bonding
7, 2014, specifies repairing a condition leads and for contact or chafing of the
(o) Material Incorporated by Reference
identified as any crack found in ‘‘an wires, and corrective actions if
intercostal,’’ this AD requires repairing a (1) The Director of the Federal Register necessary. This new AD requires a new
condition identified as any crack found in approved the incorporation by reference one-time detailed inspection of the
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
‘‘an intercostal or attaching stringers.’’
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR FSOV bonding leads to ensure that the
(l) Credit for Previous Actions part 51. correct bonding leads are inspected, and
(2) You must use this service information corrective action if necessary. This AD
This paragraph provides credit for the was prompted by a determination that
as applicable to do the actions required by
actions required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. the description of the inspection area
this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737– specified in the service information was
53A1108, Revision 7, dated July 7, 2014. (ii) misleading; therefore, some operators
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1108, Reserved.
Revision 6, dated January 9, 2014. This might have inspected incorrect bonding
(3) For Boeing service information leads. We are issuing this AD to detect
service information is not incorporated by identified in this AD, contact Boeing
reference in this AD. Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data &
and correct contact or chafing of wires
Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC and the bonding leads, which, if not
(m) Alternative Methods of Compliance
2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; phone: detected, could be a source of sparks in
(AMOCs)
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax: 206–766– the wing trailing edge, and could lead
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft 5680; Internet https:// to an uncontrolled engine fire.
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the www.myboeingfleet.com. DATES: This AD becomes effective
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if (4) You may view this service information
requested using the procedures found in 14 August 28, 2015.
at FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 The Director of the Federal Register
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
send your request to your principal inspector approved the incorporation by reference
information on the availability of this
or local Flight Standards District Office, as material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. of certain publications listed in this AD
appropriate. If sending information directly (5) You may view this service information as of August 28, 2015.
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the that is incorporated by reference at the ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
attention of the person identified in National Archives and Records docket on the Internet at http://
paragraph (n)(1) of this AD. Information may Administration (NARA). For information on www.regulations.gov/
be emailed to: 9-ANM-LAACO-ACO-AMOC- the availability of this material at NARA, call #!docketDetail;D=FAA-2015-0679; or in
Requests@faa.gov. 202–741–6030, or go to: http:// person at the Docket Management
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-
Facility, U.S. Department of
notify your appropriate principal inspector, locations.html.
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 10,
of the local flight standards district office/
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
2015. W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
certificate holding district office.
Jeffrey E. Duven, Washington, DC.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, For service information identified in
required by this AD if it is approved by the Aircraft Certification Service. this AD, contact Airbus SAS,
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization [FR Doc. 2015–17977 Filed 7–23–15; 8:45 am] Airworthiness Office—EAW, 1 Rond
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email
method to be approved, the repair must meet DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
the certification basis of the airplane, and the Internet http://www.airbus.com. You
approval must specifically refer to this AD. Federal Aviation Administration may view this referenced service
(4) AMOCs approved previously for AD
information at the FAA, Transport
98–22–10, Amendment 39–10858 (63 FR 14 CFR Part 39
57240, October 27, 1998), are approved as Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of [Docket No. FAA–2015–0679; Directorate SW., Renton, WA. For information on
this AD. Identifier 2013–NM–182–AD; Amendment the availability of this material at the
(5) Accomplishment of the preventive 39–18211; AD 2015–15–02] FAA, call 425–227–1221. It is also
modification in accordance with Boeing Alert RIN 2120–AA64 available on the Internet at http://
Service Bulletin 737–53A1108, Revision 7, www.regulations.gov by searching for
dated July 7, 2014, as required by paragraph Airworthiness Directives; Airbus and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(h) of this AD, is an AMOC for the structural Airplanes 0679.
modification specified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737–53A1108 that is AGENCY: Federal Aviation FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
required by paragraph A. of AD 90–06–02, Administration (FAA), Department of Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
Amendment 39–6489, (55 FR 8372, March 7, Transportation (DOT). International Branch, ANM–116,
1990), for the airplanes identified in Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
ACTION: Final rule.
paragraph (h) of this AD. 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:07 Jul 23, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24JYR1.SGM 24JYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/80_FR_44063/page/5.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-23 09:25:25
Document Modified: 2018-02-23 09:25:25
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This AD is effective August 28, 2015. | |
| Contact | Nenita Odesa, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5234; fax: 562-627-5210; email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 80 FR 43921 | |
| RIN Number | 2120-AA64 | |
| CFR Associated | Air Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR